Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

The bulk/cut thing is literally so simple: Spend as much time as you need getting to 10-12% body-fat one single time Baseline established! After that, simply oscillate between 10-12% body-fat and 15-17% body-fat Never go above the high end Only go below the low end if doing a show/just... show more

Dean Turner

124,626 subscribers

140,857 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Bildung Gesundheit & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

In 2020 I entered a summer shredding contest. This was my gameplan to go from 18% body fat to 10% or less body fat in 12 weeks: (Applicable no matter where you’re starting, bookmark this) 1. Eat bodyweight (in lbs) x 10-12 calories daily (more on higher activity days, less on lower) 2. Eat 1g of protein per pound of bodyweight (if you’re starting more overweight you can aim for goal bodyweight) 3. 10K+ steps daily and progressively more cardio sessions (0 - month 1, 2-3x45 minutes/wk month 2, 5-6x45 minutes month 3) 4. Lifted 5x/week on a push, pull, legs, rest, upper, lower, rest split with a focus on: - every set ending near failure - fighting to get stronger week by week - managing volume (less volume towards end of the cut for recovery) 5. Limited alcohol to only a few drinks/month 6. Slept 7 hours/night minimum 7. 5g creatine daily 8. Drank around a .75-1 gallon of water + electrolytes daily 9. Refeed days (bodyweight x 15 calorie goal), 1x/wk in month 3 The framework is really this simple to drop body fat. Adjustments will need to be made based on biofeedback & weight data. If you aren’t losing at a rate of 0.5-1% bodyweight per week, you must: - increase your average weekly movement (steps or cardio minutes) - and/or decrease your average weekly calorie intake. Hope this helps guide you to a leaner version of yourself. 🤝

In 2020 I entered a summer shredding contest. This was my gameplan to go from 18% body fat to 10% or less body fat in 12 weeks: (Applicable no matter where you’re starting, bookmark this) 1. Eat bodyweight (in lbs) x 10-12 calories daily (more on higher activity days, less on lower) 2. Eat 1g of protein per pound of bodyweight (if you’re starting more overweight you can aim for goal bodyweight) 3. 10K+ steps daily and progressively more cardio sessions (0 - month 1, 2-3x45 minutes/wk month 2, 5-6x45 minutes month 3) 4. Lifted 5x/week on a push, pull, legs, rest, upper, lower, rest split with a focus on: - every set ending near failure - fighting to get stronger week by week - managing volume (less volume towards end of the cut for recovery) 5. Limited alcohol to only a few drinks/month 6. Slept 7 hours/night minimum 7. 5g creatine daily 8. Drank around a .75-1 gallon of water + electrolytes daily 9. Refeed days (bodyweight x 15 calorie goal), 1x/wk in month 3 The framework is really this simple to drop body fat. Adjustments will need to be made based on biofeedback & weight data. If you aren’t losing at a rate of 0.5-1% bodyweight per week, you must: - increase your average weekly movement (steps or cardio minutes) - and/or decrease your average weekly calorie intake. Hope this helps guide you to a leaner version of yourself. 🤝

Chace Chambers

210,104 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

CBum did have to get as low as 1500 calories on his off days 1800 calories on training days So we can assume an average of around 1700 This is not depletion either This was in the thick of his prep At 250 lbs!!! (he said his weight in the same video) using TONS of drugs Granted he was lean as fuck & attempting to get even leaner but again 2 5 0 POUNDS WITH DRUGS and he was doing HOURS of cardio per day (he also said this in the same video) So, yes…your average Joe that weighs 180 trying to get that last bit of fat off to get to a pretty lean 175 might need to drop as low as 1700, 1600, 1500 calories per day!

CBum did have to get as low as 1500 calories on his off days 1800 calories on training days So we can assume an average of around 1700 This is not depletion either This was in the thick of his prep At 250 lbs!!! (he said his weight in the same video) using TONS of drugs Granted he was lean as fuck & attempting to get even leaner but again 2 5 0 POUNDS WITH DRUGS and he was doing HOURS of cardio per day (he also said this in the same video) So, yes…your average Joe that weighs 180 trying to get that last bit of fat off to get to a pretty lean 175 might need to drop as low as 1700, 1600, 1500 calories per day!

Dean Turner

595,926 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

You don't need a caloric surplus to maximise muscle gain.⠀ ⠀ An intermediate natural lifter gains around half a kilogram of muscle a month. That's 15 grams a day.⠀ ⠀ Muscle is roughly 75% water. The dry tissue you're depositing daily is around 4 grams of actual protein and minerals.⠀ ⠀ Caloric cost of laying that down: about 6 calories.⠀ ⠀ Six. The amount in a single grape.⠀ ⠀ Now look at the bulking advice:⠀ ⠀ - 300 calorie surplus⠀ - 500 calorie surplus⠀ - "Eat big to get big"⠀ - "You have to be in a surplus"⠀ - 3,500 calories minimum⠀ ⠀ You're being told to eat hundreds of calories above maintenance to fund a process that costs the energy of a small piece of fruit.⠀ ⠀ Where do those extra calories go?⠀ ⠀ - Glycogen (with water bound to it)⠀ - Subcutaneous fat⠀ - Visceral fat⠀ - The toilet, eventually⠀ ⠀ The scale moves. The mirror moves. The waistband moves. The actual muscle deposition does not move any faster than it was already going to.⠀ ⠀ You cannot force-feed your way to faster hypertrophy. You can only feed enough, then wait.⠀ ⠀ The body grows muscle on a schedule. Your job is to show up, not to overpay.

You don't need a caloric surplus to maximise muscle gain.⠀ ⠀ An intermediate natural lifter gains around half a kilogram of muscle a month. That's 15 grams a day.⠀ ⠀ Muscle is roughly 75% water. The dry tissue you're depositing daily is around 4 grams of actual protein and minerals.⠀ ⠀ Caloric cost of laying that down: about 6 calories.⠀ ⠀ Six. The amount in a single grape.⠀ ⠀ Now look at the bulking advice:⠀ ⠀ - 300 calorie surplus⠀ - 500 calorie surplus⠀ - "Eat big to get big"⠀ - "You have to be in a surplus"⠀ - 3,500 calories minimum⠀ ⠀ You're being told to eat hundreds of calories above maintenance to fund a process that costs the energy of a small piece of fruit.⠀ ⠀ Where do those extra calories go?⠀ ⠀ - Glycogen (with water bound to it)⠀ - Subcutaneous fat⠀ - Visceral fat⠀ - The toilet, eventually⠀ ⠀ The scale moves. The mirror moves. The waistband moves. The actual muscle deposition does not move any faster than it was already going to.⠀ ⠀ You cannot force-feed your way to faster hypertrophy. You can only feed enough, then wait.⠀ ⠀ The body grows muscle on a schedule. Your job is to show up, not to overpay.

Sama Hoole

47,002 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Bot turned $100 to $6,973 on weather on Polymarket He did it only thanks to this simple strategy: He makes 5–10 predictions per day, with prices no higher than 10 cents And he always risks no more than $3 per bet examples of its wins: - $352 on will the highest temperature in NYC be between 46–47°F on December 17 at 0.5 cents - $148 on will the highest temperature in Seoul be 2°C on January 17 at 0.2 cents - $129 on will the highest temperature in NYC be between 40–41°F on January 17 at 0.4 cents His strategy literally lets him buy bets at very low prices with less than $2, and make +1000% from a single prediction profile: if you want alerts and to copy-trade his actions:

Paone

12,036 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

If you’re not musclemaxxing, now is the time to start. Sarcopenia starts around 40. You lose roughly 8% of your muscle per decade until about 70, and around 15% per decade after that. (In the video I’m doing a pull down with my actual body weight) Before perimenopause, muscle holds steady in most cases. Through the transition it flips, and after menopause it falls about 0.6% a year while fat gain nearly doubles. We also start 30 to 35% behind men in absolute muscle mass. The transition widens a gap that was already there. So the stake is whether you can get off the floor unaided at eighty, whether your blood sugar stays in range, and whether your bones become brittle.

If you’re not musclemaxxing, now is the time to start. Sarcopenia starts around 40. You lose roughly 8% of your muscle per decade until about 70, and around 15% per decade after that. (In the video I’m doing a pull down with my actual body weight) Before perimenopause, muscle holds steady in most cases. Through the transition it flips, and after menopause it falls about 0.6% a year while fat gain nearly doubles. We also start 30 to 35% behind men in absolute muscle mass. The transition widens a gap that was already there. So the stake is whether you can get off the floor unaided at eighty, whether your blood sugar stays in range, and whether your bones become brittle.

Kayla Barnes-Lentz

15,729 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

Big Protein has convinced an entire generation they need a gram per pound of bodyweight. They don't. They're being sold way more protein than they can actually use, and a tub to mix it in. The ceiling for muscle protein synthesis sits closer to 0.7g per pound of bodyweight. Above that, the magic stops. You're not building extra muscle. You're deaminating the surplus, dumping nitrogen as urea, and lazily converting the rest into glucose. Premium steak, burnt as second-rate fuel. Congratulations. And here's the bit the protein bar adverts somehow forget to mention. Excess protein becomes weak, glucose-adjacent energy that taxes the liver and the kidneys, when the body would have vastly preferred to be running on fat. Dense. Stable. Clean. The fuel big animals are actually built for. But no, by all means, choke down your fourth chicken breast of the day. Hit that arbitrary number some bloke on a podcast invented in 2008. Your kidneys will write you a lovely thank-you note. Eat enough protein to build. Get the rest of your energy from fat. Everything past that point is just expensive urine.

Big Protein has convinced an entire generation they need a gram per pound of bodyweight. They don't. They're being sold way more protein than they can actually use, and a tub to mix it in. The ceiling for muscle protein synthesis sits closer to 0.7g per pound of bodyweight. Above that, the magic stops. You're not building extra muscle. You're deaminating the surplus, dumping nitrogen as urea, and lazily converting the rest into glucose. Premium steak, burnt as second-rate fuel. Congratulations. And here's the bit the protein bar adverts somehow forget to mention. Excess protein becomes weak, glucose-adjacent energy that taxes the liver and the kidneys, when the body would have vastly preferred to be running on fat. Dense. Stable. Clean. The fuel big animals are actually built for. But no, by all means, choke down your fourth chicken breast of the day. Hit that arbitrary number some bloke on a podcast invented in 2008. Your kidneys will write you a lovely thank-you note. Eat enough protein to build. Get the rest of your energy from fat. Everything past that point is just expensive urine.

Sama Hoole

122,677 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Been using the past 5 days as a test. I have been VERY inaccessible to my employees. The goal is to: 1. Enjoy vacation 2. See what “breaks” when I’m not working 12 hours per day To my surprise, nothing has broken so far. Not one thing. The business has continued to drive value for clients without my direct involvement. This leaves me with three responsibilities: 1. Lead gen 2. Recruiting 3. Innovation It’s been a fantastic exercise so far (plus I shot -1 par for the first time ever).

Been using the past 5 days as a test. I have been VERY inaccessible to my employees. The goal is to: 1. Enjoy vacation 2. See what “breaks” when I’m not working 12 hours per day To my surprise, nothing has broken so far. Not one thing. The business has continued to drive value for clients without my direct involvement. This leaves me with three responsibilities: 1. Lead gen 2. Recruiting 3. Innovation It’s been a fantastic exercise so far (plus I shot -1 par for the first time ever).

Collin Rutherford

34,009 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

IF I WAS FORCED to build a $20K/month AI creative agency using nothing but Photoshop, starting from 0, here's exactly what I would do in steps: The production setup (Days 1–3) 1. Download the Higgsfield plugin inside Photoshop — takes 5 minutes 2. You now have: sketch-to-image, layer decomposer, mockup studio, relight, upscale, face swap, character swap, background removal, AI stylist — all in 1 tool 3. Old creative agency workflow: designer + photographer + editor + 3–5 day turnaround 4. New workflow: 1 person, Photoshop, 30 minutes per deliverable The offer (Days 3–7) 5. Pick 1 niche — ecom brands, real estate agents, or course creators all need visuals constantly 6. Build a simple offer: "10 ad creatives delivered in 24 hours — $500" 7. Old agencies charge $2,000–$5,000/month for the same output 8. Your cost to deliver: $0 beyond the plugin. Pure margin. 9. Create 3 sample mockups using the tool — drop a product image in, generate 9 variations, pick the best 3 10. That's your portfolio. Built in under 1 hour. Cost: $0. The client machine (Days 7–20) 11. Go on X and search "[niche] + need a designer" or "[niche] + creatives" 12. DM 50 people per day — "I'll make you 3 free ad creatives in 24 hours, no catch" 13. Deliver them in 30 minutes using the plugin 14. 50 DMs/day × 14 days = 700 outreach messages 15. Conservative 3% conversion = 21 people see the free work 16. Close 5 of them at $500 = $2,500 in week 3 The scale (Days 20–30) 17. Upsell every client to a $1,500/month retainer — 10 creatives/week, unlimited revisions 18. 1 client per day in Photoshop takes 45 minutes max 19. 10 retainer clients × $1,500 = $15,000/month 20. Add 3 one-off clients at $500/month = $1,500 21. Add a $997 "AI creative system" course teaching other people this exact workflow = $3,000+/month from 3 sales The math: 50 DMs/day × 30 days = 1,500 outreach messages 3% book a call = 45 calls 40% close at $1,500/month retainer = 18 clients 18 × $1,500 = $27,000/month recurring Time per client per day: 45 minutes Total daily work: 4–5 hours Every mockup — AI. Every restyle — AI. Every layer rebuild — AI. Every variation — AI. No photographer. No designer and no reshoot. Start it here. 👇

IF I WAS FORCED to build a $20K/month AI creative agency using nothing but Photoshop, starting from 0, here's exactly what I would do in steps: The production setup (Days 1–3) 1. Download the Higgsfield plugin inside Photoshop — takes 5 minutes 2. You now have: sketch-to-image, layer decomposer, mockup studio, relight, upscale, face swap, character swap, background removal, AI stylist — all in 1 tool 3. Old creative agency workflow: designer + photographer + editor + 3–5 day turnaround 4. New workflow: 1 person, Photoshop, 30 minutes per deliverable The offer (Days 3–7) 5. Pick 1 niche — ecom brands, real estate agents, or course creators all need visuals constantly 6. Build a simple offer: "10 ad creatives delivered in 24 hours — $500" 7. Old agencies charge $2,000–$5,000/month for the same output 8. Your cost to deliver: $0 beyond the plugin. Pure margin. 9. Create 3 sample mockups using the tool — drop a product image in, generate 9 variations, pick the best 3 10. That's your portfolio. Built in under 1 hour. Cost: $0. The client machine (Days 7–20) 11. Go on X and search "[niche] + need a designer" or "[niche] + creatives" 12. DM 50 people per day — "I'll make you 3 free ad creatives in 24 hours, no catch" 13. Deliver them in 30 minutes using the plugin 14. 50 DMs/day × 14 days = 700 outreach messages 15. Conservative 3% conversion = 21 people see the free work 16. Close 5 of them at $500 = $2,500 in week 3 The scale (Days 20–30) 17. Upsell every client to a $1,500/month retainer — 10 creatives/week, unlimited revisions 18. 1 client per day in Photoshop takes 45 minutes max 19. 10 retainer clients × $1,500 = $15,000/month 20. Add 3 one-off clients at $500/month = $1,500 21. Add a $997 "AI creative system" course teaching other people this exact workflow = $3,000+/month from 3 sales The math: 50 DMs/day × 30 days = 1,500 outreach messages 3% book a call = 45 calls 40% close at $1,500/month retainer = 18 clients 18 × $1,500 = $27,000/month recurring Time per client per day: 45 minutes Total daily work: 4–5 hours Every mockup — AI. Every restyle — AI. Every layer rebuild — AI. Every variation — AI. No photographer. No designer and no reshoot. Start it here. 👇

ALEX SUZUKI

20,557 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

5.5 months left in 2025. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Make the most of it. You can lose 20+ lbs of fat. You can build pounds of muscle. You can establish healthy habits. You can get yourself in routine. You can stop living in regret. One day or day 1. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ My current shit: - 2400 cals / 150 gr protein - Lifting 4x/week - Walking 12,000+ steps - 90% Whole Foods - 10% Oreo sandwiches - Basketball once a week - Interval running training once a week - One short/hard HIIT a week - 7-8 hrs of sleep - 5 liters of water - Sauna 6 days a week ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ For you? - Learn how to track calories for a period of time - Eat mainly unprocessed foods - Drink more water - Go for 1-3 walks a day - Get more sleep - Lift 2-4x/week - Hire a coach if necessary

5.5 months left in 2025. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Make the most of it. You can lose 20+ lbs of fat. You can build pounds of muscle. You can establish healthy habits. You can get yourself in routine. You can stop living in regret. One day or day 1. ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ My current shit: - 2400 cals / 150 gr protein - Lifting 4x/week - Walking 12,000+ steps - 90% Whole Foods - 10% Oreo sandwiches - Basketball once a week - Interval running training once a week - One short/hard HIIT a week - 7-8 hrs of sleep - 5 liters of water - Sauna 6 days a week ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ For you? - Learn how to track calories for a period of time - Eat mainly unprocessed foods - Drink more water - Go for 1-3 walks a day - Get more sleep - Lift 2-4x/week - Hire a coach if necessary

Darren Liu

45,238 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

TikTok Phone Farms are the new Gold Rush…. (Apparently) i’m posting over 2500+ TikTok’s this month Here’s the 4 rules I follow whenever I create a fresh TikTok account to guarantee success on day 1. 1. Create the account inside the USA, using a USA based wifi/VPN. 2. Only use 3 TikTok accounts per phone. Any more & TT can flag it as farming. 3. Don’t post on day 1. Warm up the account for 3-7 days. 4. Build an inspo list for your warmup process. Either you, or your team member should engage on the fresh account 2x per day for 5-10 mins. Follow 10-15 accounts from your inspiration list. Like, save, comment and share. Don’t start posting content until your TikTok FYP is only showing content from within your niche. So that you know your account is ‘warm’ and optimized to go viral.

TikTok Phone Farms are the new Gold Rush…. (Apparently) i’m posting over 2500+ TikTok’s this month Here’s the 4 rules I follow whenever I create a fresh TikTok account to guarantee success on day 1. 1. Create the account inside the USA, using a USA based wifi/VPN. 2. Only use 3 TikTok accounts per phone. Any more & TT can flag it as farming. 3. Don’t post on day 1. Warm up the account for 3-7 days. 4. Build an inspo list for your warmup process. Either you, or your team member should engage on the fresh account 2x per day for 5-10 mins. Follow 10-15 accounts from your inspiration list. Like, save, comment and share. Don’t start posting content until your TikTok FYP is only showing content from within your niche. So that you know your account is ‘warm’ and optimized to go viral.

Lachy_eddy

185,994 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Bro Split that every young lad gets sold on looks like this.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Chest⠀ Tuesday: Back⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Legs⠀ Friday: Shoulders⠀ Saturday: Arms⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ And yes, Arnold did it. Arnold also took enough drugs to sedate a medium-sized country, so perhaps not the most transferable template.⠀ ⠀ The problem is simple. Each muscle here gets hit once a week. Train hard enough and you'll trigger a window of muscle protein synthesis that runs for roughly 2-3 days. After that the window closes, and the muscle fibres begin to catabolise slowly. The back half of the week isn't neutral. It's quietly eroding the growth stimulus you picked up on Monday.⠀ ⠀ Once a week is not a holding pattern. It's a losing one.⠀ ⠀ The fix is training each muscle at least twice. An upper/lower split does this cleanly.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Upper⠀ Tuesday: Lower⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Upper⠀ Friday: Rest⠀ Saturday: Lower⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ Same days in the gym. Every muscle getting two shots at the growth window per week instead of one.⠀ ⠀ If there's a specific muscle you want to bring up faster, glutes being the obvious example, you can push that to three times a week with a full body approach, hitting the priority muscle first in every session when you're freshest.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Wednesday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Friday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ ⠀ More frequent stimulus. More growth windows captured. Less of the week spent sliding backwards.⠀ ⠀ The Bro Split isn't useless. It just isn't optimal. And if you're going to spend the time, you may as well spend it on something that actually works.⠀ ⠀ Minimum twice a week per muscle. Three if you're serious about a lagging group. The rest is just detail.

The Bro Split that every young lad gets sold on looks like this.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Chest⠀ Tuesday: Back⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Legs⠀ Friday: Shoulders⠀ Saturday: Arms⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ And yes, Arnold did it. Arnold also took enough drugs to sedate a medium-sized country, so perhaps not the most transferable template.⠀ ⠀ The problem is simple. Each muscle here gets hit once a week. Train hard enough and you'll trigger a window of muscle protein synthesis that runs for roughly 2-3 days. After that the window closes, and the muscle fibres begin to catabolise slowly. The back half of the week isn't neutral. It's quietly eroding the growth stimulus you picked up on Monday.⠀ ⠀ Once a week is not a holding pattern. It's a losing one.⠀ ⠀ The fix is training each muscle at least twice. An upper/lower split does this cleanly.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Upper⠀ Tuesday: Lower⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Upper⠀ Friday: Rest⠀ Saturday: Lower⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ Same days in the gym. Every muscle getting two shots at the growth window per week instead of one.⠀ ⠀ If there's a specific muscle you want to bring up faster, glutes being the obvious example, you can push that to three times a week with a full body approach, hitting the priority muscle first in every session when you're freshest.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Wednesday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Friday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ ⠀ More frequent stimulus. More growth windows captured. Less of the week spent sliding backwards.⠀ ⠀ The Bro Split isn't useless. It just isn't optimal. And if you're going to spend the time, you may as well spend it on something that actually works.⠀ ⠀ Minimum twice a week per muscle. Three if you're serious about a lagging group. The rest is just detail.

Sama Hoole

24,136 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Costco gas is cheaper because they run on super slim profit margins compared to regular gas stations. They make just a few cents per gallon on fuel, versus the typical 25- to 35-cent markup at most stations. Today, the national average for regular gas is around $4.40 per gallon, while Costco often sells it 10–30 cents cheaper per gallon — and sometimes more depending on the location. They actually sell way more gas overall by keeping prices low, which drives massive volume — especially when prices are high. Costco doesn’t make much profit from groceries either, selling most items at or just above cost. But the real money comes from membership fees, which account for roughly two-thirds of the company’s profit. This model lets them use gas as a customer magnet while traditional stations have to make thicker profits per gallon to stay in business. Smart strategy that saves members big at the pump. Do you buy gas at Costco? (Video: AI)

Costco gas is cheaper because they run on super slim profit margins compared to regular gas stations. They make just a few cents per gallon on fuel, versus the typical 25- to 35-cent markup at most stations. Today, the national average for regular gas is around $4.40 per gallon, while Costco often sells it 10–30 cents cheaper per gallon — and sometimes more depending on the location. They actually sell way more gas overall by keeping prices low, which drives massive volume — especially when prices are high. Costco doesn’t make much profit from groceries either, selling most items at or just above cost. But the real money comes from membership fees, which account for roughly two-thirds of the company’s profit. This model lets them use gas as a customer magnet while traditional stations have to make thicker profits per gallon to stay in business. Smart strategy that saves members big at the pump. Do you buy gas at Costco? (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

17,243 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Distinctive Yield Mechanics 1/2 I hold 1,000,000 $XPR at $7 each. That gives me $7,000,000 in collateral value. If I borrow against 25% of that position, my loan amount is: $7,000,000 × 25% = $1,750,000 My current LTV is 25%. At $1,750,000 borrowed against $7,000,000 in collateral, I am sitting at 25% LTV, which leaves a large buffer. Now the interest. A 12% annual borrow rate on $1,750,000 equals: $1,750,000 × 0.12 = $210,000 per year That breaks down to: $210,000 ÷ 12 = $17,500 per month So the debt cost is: $17,500 a month $210,000 a year Now look at the remaining capital. The other 75% of the position represents $5,250,000 in value. If that $5,250,000 is put to work at a conservative 4% annual return, the yield becomes: $5,250,000 × 0.04 = $210,000 per year Monthly, that becomes: $210,000 ÷ 12 = $17,500 per month So the mechanics line up cleanly: Borrow 25% at 12% APR Earn 4% on the remaining 75% Debt cost = $210,000/year Yield generated = $210,000/year Same result from another angle: 25% × 12% = 3% 75% × 4% = 3% So the 4% earned on the 75% can fully service the 12% interest owed on the 25% borrowed. That creates a break-even carry structure before fees, token price changes, liquidation mechanics, reward changes, or compounding differences enter the picture. The hard mechanics are simple: XPR is posted as collateral A smaller amount is borrowed against it Interest accrues on the borrowed amount Yield accrues on the larger remaining portion As long as the yield earned covers the interest owed, the debt can be serviced from the productive side of the position The clean takeaway: A 25% borrow at 12% costs the same annually as a 4% return on the remaining 75%. $1,750,000 borrowed at 12% = $210,000/year owed. $5,250,000 deployed at 4% = $210,000/year earned. That is the hard math.

Distinctive Yield Mechanics 1/2 I hold 1,000,000 $XPR at $7 each. That gives me $7,000,000 in collateral value. If I borrow against 25% of that position, my loan amount is: $7,000,000 × 25% = $1,750,000 My current LTV is 25%. At $1,750,000 borrowed against $7,000,000 in collateral, I am sitting at 25% LTV, which leaves a large buffer. Now the interest. A 12% annual borrow rate on $1,750,000 equals: $1,750,000 × 0.12 = $210,000 per year That breaks down to: $210,000 ÷ 12 = $17,500 per month So the debt cost is: $17,500 a month $210,000 a year Now look at the remaining capital. The other 75% of the position represents $5,250,000 in value. If that $5,250,000 is put to work at a conservative 4% annual return, the yield becomes: $5,250,000 × 0.04 = $210,000 per year Monthly, that becomes: $210,000 ÷ 12 = $17,500 per month So the mechanics line up cleanly: Borrow 25% at 12% APR Earn 4% on the remaining 75% Debt cost = $210,000/year Yield generated = $210,000/year Same result from another angle: 25% × 12% = 3% 75% × 4% = 3% So the 4% earned on the 75% can fully service the 12% interest owed on the 25% borrowed. That creates a break-even carry structure before fees, token price changes, liquidation mechanics, reward changes, or compounding differences enter the picture. The hard mechanics are simple: XPR is posted as collateral A smaller amount is borrowed against it Interest accrues on the borrowed amount Yield accrues on the larger remaining portion As long as the yield earned covers the interest owed, the debt can be serviced from the productive side of the position The clean takeaway: A 25% borrow at 12% costs the same annually as a 4% return on the remaining 75%. $1,750,000 borrowed at 12% = $210,000/year owed. $5,250,000 deployed at 4% = $210,000/year earned. That is the hard math.

X-juPiteR-X

60,474 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

CAPITAL HAS NEVER BEEN THE ISSUE WHEN IT COMES TO MAKING MONEY IN SYNTHETIC INDICES. DO YOU KNOW YOU CAN OPEN A POSITION ON MOST PAIRS WITH LESS AN $1 ? Here's a thread on how to; Read to the end.👇 I executed VIX 10s on a $7 account, and it's currently sitting at $140. Growing small accounts on synthetics is quite different from growing big accounts, because small retracements can lead to liquidation before reaching your stoploss point especially when you stack randomly. 4 major steps to take: 1. High probability setups only: The easiest way to flip an account is a zero drawdown setup. A small account cannot accommodate massive retracements and so only high probability setups must be taken. 2. Choose a pair with low margin requirement and stable volatility: Here’s a list of pairs and their margin requirements to choose from; • Volatility 100 index -Minimum lotsize: 0.50 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.6 per position • Volatility 75 index -Minimum lotsize: 0.001 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.08 per position • Volatility 50(1s) index -Minimum lotsize : 0.005 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.36 per position • Volatility 25(1s) index -Minimum lotsize: 0.005 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.62 per position • Volatility 250(1s) index -Minimum lotzise: 0.005 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.21 per position • Volatility 25 index -Minimum lotsize: 0.50 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.27 per position • Volatility 50 index -Minimum lotsize: 4.00 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.49 per position • Volatility 100(1s) index -Minimum lotsize: 0.20 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.09 per position • Volatility 150(1s) index -Minimum lotsize: 0.01 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.03 per position • Volatility 10(1s) index -Minimum lotsize: 0.50 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.91 per position • Volatility 10 index -Minimum lotsize: 0.50 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.63 per position • Volatility 75(1s) index -Minimum lotsize: 0.05 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.27 per position. 3. Leverage on stacking at SPECIFIC points: You can make only $10 from a $5 account and another person makes $100 from same account, difference is the leveraging and stacking points. If you can stack, utilize the skill and exit when you should. 4. Position sizing and risk management: When you’re buying , you’ll start making up bullish reasons for your setup. It won’t let you see the big picture. Make sure the reason why you’re pressing buy is not just because you want to flip but because you infact believe in your analysis. It’s easier to make money when you’re buying when the market is buying and selling when the market is selling. That’ll be the end for today’s post. Goodluck. 🍷 Retweet the post to enlighten struggling traders. Follow me, Starr🌟, and turn on post notifications to stay updated and be the first to see whenever I make a post. Check my highlights for more trading tips to help you as a trader. You’ll find trade documentaries, breakdowns, insights, results and my personal thoughts on my WhatsApp. Click the link below to connect.👇

CAPITAL HAS NEVER BEEN THE ISSUE WHEN IT COMES TO MAKING MONEY IN SYNTHETIC INDICES. DO YOU KNOW YOU CAN OPEN A POSITION ON MOST PAIRS WITH LESS AN $1 ? Here's a thread on how to; Read to the end.👇 I executed VIX 10s on a $7 account, and it's currently sitting at $140. Growing small accounts on synthetics is quite different from growing big accounts, because small retracements can lead to liquidation before reaching your stoploss point especially when you stack randomly. 4 major steps to take: 1. High probability setups only: The easiest way to flip an account is a zero drawdown setup. A small account cannot accommodate massive retracements and so only high probability setups must be taken. 2. Choose a pair with low margin requirement and stable volatility: Here’s a list of pairs and their margin requirements to choose from; • Volatility 100 index -Minimum lotsize: 0.50 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.6 per position • Volatility 75 index -Minimum lotsize: 0.001 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.08 per position • Volatility 50(1s) index -Minimum lotsize : 0.005 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.36 per position • Volatility 25(1s) index -Minimum lotsize: 0.005 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.62 per position • Volatility 250(1s) index -Minimum lotzise: 0.005 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.21 per position • Volatility 25 index -Minimum lotsize: 0.50 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.27 per position • Volatility 50 index -Minimum lotsize: 4.00 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.49 per position • Volatility 100(1s) index -Minimum lotsize: 0.20 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.09 per position • Volatility 150(1s) index -Minimum lotsize: 0.01 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.03 per position • Volatility 10(1s) index -Minimum lotsize: 0.50 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.91 per position • Volatility 10 index -Minimum lotsize: 0.50 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.63 per position • Volatility 75(1s) index -Minimum lotsize: 0.05 -Margin cost on minimum lotsize: $0.27 per position. 3. Leverage on stacking at SPECIFIC points: You can make only $10 from a $5 account and another person makes $100 from same account, difference is the leveraging and stacking points. If you can stack, utilize the skill and exit when you should. 4. Position sizing and risk management: When you’re buying , you’ll start making up bullish reasons for your setup. It won’t let you see the big picture. Make sure the reason why you’re pressing buy is not just because you want to flip but because you infact believe in your analysis. It’s easier to make money when you’re buying when the market is buying and selling when the market is selling. That’ll be the end for today’s post. Goodluck. 🍷 Retweet the post to enlighten struggling traders. Follow me, Starr🌟, and turn on post notifications to stay updated and be the first to see whenever I make a post. Check my highlights for more trading tips to help you as a trader. You’ll find trade documentaries, breakdowns, insights, results and my personal thoughts on my WhatsApp. Click the link below to connect.👇

Starr🌟

118,536 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I sacrificed this body for $200k/mrr this video is from 3 years ago → 210 pounds → 6'3 → 19 yo This was just as my entrepreneurship journey was beginning 3 years later I gained 40 pounds But made millions And it was not worth it... for years my routine was: → daily redbulls → Takeouts everyday → maybe 1,000 steps per day → 18 hour work days → 4 hours of sleep average I became obsessed with success But I was extremely unhealthy i left everything else to the side family functions the gym the sun Literally everything Looking back this was a huge mistake. I should have found a way to do both at once. But I can’t change the past.. so 3 weeks ago I made a decision And now I'm on my 3rd consecutive week back to the gym 10k steps daily High protein diet Down 5 pounds already and I'm starting to rebuild my body back to what it was. I feel 100000% better. I hope you take a lesson from this tweet no amount of financial success can match the feeling of having a strong and healthy body.

I sacrificed this body for $200k/mrr this video is from 3 years ago → 210 pounds → 6'3 → 19 yo This was just as my entrepreneurship journey was beginning 3 years later I gained 40 pounds But made millions And it was not worth it... for years my routine was: → daily redbulls → Takeouts everyday → maybe 1,000 steps per day → 18 hour work days → 4 hours of sleep average I became obsessed with success But I was extremely unhealthy i left everything else to the side family functions the gym the sun Literally everything Looking back this was a huge mistake. I should have found a way to do both at once. But I can’t change the past.. so 3 weeks ago I made a decision And now I'm on my 3rd consecutive week back to the gym 10k steps daily High protein diet Down 5 pounds already and I'm starting to rebuild my body back to what it was. I feel 100000% better. I hope you take a lesson from this tweet no amount of financial success can match the feeling of having a strong and healthy body.

Ernesto Lopez

19,314 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

$400K in under a month. This OpenClaw setup is averaging: • ~$5 per second • ~$300 per hour • ~$7K per day Proof → Copytrade → And here’s what surprised most people: It kept printing even after the 500ms delay was removed. So this isn’t just latency. It’s structure. What it actually does: • Trades only 5-minute BTC Up/Down markets • Focuses on the first ~4 minutes of the contract • Buys YES + NO repeatedly when combined price drops below $1 • Holds into expiry If YES = $0.49 And NO = $0.50 That’s $0.99 total. One side must settle at $1. The spread is locked in. 6,823 trades. No alpha. No macro view. No prediction on BTC direction. Just exploiting temporary mispricing inside short-duration markets. Small edges. Repeated thousands of times. Position size increases as balance grows. It’s not trying to be right. It’s trying to be structurally ahead of inefficient pricing. Not narratives. Not opinions. Math + automation.

$400K in under a month. This OpenClaw setup is averaging: • ~$5 per second • ~$300 per hour • ~$7K per day Proof → Copytrade → And here’s what surprised most people: It kept printing even after the 500ms delay was removed. So this isn’t just latency. It’s structure. What it actually does: • Trades only 5-minute BTC Up/Down markets • Focuses on the first ~4 minutes of the contract • Buys YES + NO repeatedly when combined price drops below $1 • Holds into expiry If YES = $0.49 And NO = $0.50 That’s $0.99 total. One side must settle at $1. The spread is locked in. 6,823 trades. No alpha. No macro view. No prediction on BTC direction. Just exploiting temporary mispricing inside short-duration markets. Small edges. Repeated thousands of times. Position size increases as balance grows. It’s not trying to be right. It’s trying to be structurally ahead of inefficient pricing. Not narratives. Not opinions. Math + automation.

Phantom_Defi

326,724 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This is one of the most powerful AI workflows I've ever built. It literally saves me 10+ hours/week and has replaced a full-time employee on my team. If you make content on X, you NEED to replicate this. I just automated 90% of my entire content research process using the new upgraded X API. This dashboard analyses hundreds of my viral tweets, extracts my exact tone/voice, and generates hundreds of new content ideas per day. It also includes a built-in heatmap that highlights when I'm outperforming. If you're looking to build a distribution moat with content/creative, this is a must.

This is one of the most powerful AI workflows I've ever built. It literally saves me 10+ hours/week and has replaced a full-time employee on my team. If you make content on X, you NEED to replicate this. I just automated 90% of my entire content research process using the new upgraded X API. This dashboard analyses hundreds of my viral tweets, extracts my exact tone/voice, and generates hundreds of new content ideas per day. It also includes a built-in heatmap that highlights when I'm outperforming. If you're looking to build a distribution moat with content/creative, this is a must.

Miles Deutscher

23,507 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Update on the water bottles left sitting in the sun before being sold to Americans 3 days ager they are still cooking in the summer sun. This is where they are stored Reminder: Just one day of sitting in the sun releases thousands, to tens of thousands of additional microplastic particles - A 2024 study found an average of 240,000 plastic particles per liter in bottled water, with 90% being nanoplastics (smaller than 1 micrometer) and 10% microplastics (1-5 mm) - Heat accelerates plastic degradation, increasing chemical and microplastic leaching. - Higher temperatures break down chemical bonds in plastics, causing more microplastics to shed - Based on studies, a 1-liter PET bottle left in a hot car (e.g., 120-150°F) for a day could release thousands to tens of thousands of additional microplastic particles beyond the baseline 240,000 per liter, especially if exposed to sunlight or mechanically stress

Update on the water bottles left sitting in the sun before being sold to Americans 3 days ager they are still cooking in the summer sun. This is where they are stored Reminder: Just one day of sitting in the sun releases thousands, to tens of thousands of additional microplastic particles - A 2024 study found an average of 240,000 plastic particles per liter in bottled water, with 90% being nanoplastics (smaller than 1 micrometer) and 10% microplastics (1-5 mm) - Heat accelerates plastic degradation, increasing chemical and microplastic leaching. - Higher temperatures break down chemical bonds in plastics, causing more microplastics to shed - Based on studies, a 1-liter PET bottle left in a hot car (e.g., 120-150°F) for a day could release thousands to tens of thousands of additional microplastic particles beyond the baseline 240,000 per liter, especially if exposed to sunlight or mechanically stress

Wall Street Apes

205,697 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 Weigh in 22 🚨 LOWEST WEIGH IN: 297.8 LBS Frank has lost 225+ pounds Frank was 520+ pounds in 2016 (scale couldn’t go higher). Here is his monthly progress since we started Frank Walks (679 days in a row and counting): 383 pounds before walking daily Weigh in 1: 373 pounds Weigh in 2: 352 pounds Weigh in 3: 343 pounds Weigh in 4: 340 pounds Weigh in 5: 339 pounds Weigh in 6: 333.8 pounds Weigh in 7: 331 pounds Weigh in 8: 323.8 pounds Weigh in 9: 319.8 pounds Weigh in 10: 324 pounds Weigh in 11: 330 pounds Weigh in 12: 327.8 pounds Weigh in 13: 318.5 pounds Weigh in 14: 321.8 pounds Weigh in 15: 326 pounds Weigh in 16: 314 pounds Weigh in 17: 316 pounds Weigh in 18: 312.5 pounds Weigh in 19: 315 pounds Weigh in 20: 307.5 pounds Weigh in 21: 306 A couple of weeks ago, Frank hit 299.5, dipping below 300 for the first time since Bill Clinton was the President. Here are the results from weigh in 22: ◦297.8 pounds - Frank has lost 225+ pounds since his all time high ◦Blood sugar: A1C is 5.7% down from 11.1% (years of life expectancy 12+ 📈) Accepting the fact that “stress eating” is not a valid excuse for undermining hard work is critical. Frank easily gets stressed and he has to stop turning to food in those moments, especially when he’s alone. He’s been crushing his walks and exercise. He’s the lightest he’s been since the 1990’s and he is capable of doing things he never thought was possible. For example, catching a pass from Eli Manning last week and running down a football field. Best of all, it is inspiring others. Now, it’s time to hit the weights more and continue to improve diet across the board. No excuses. One day at a time. Congrats, Frank! Thank you Tank’s Army! Anudder weigh in in the books

🚨 Weigh in 22 🚨 LOWEST WEIGH IN: 297.8 LBS Frank has lost 225+ pounds Frank was 520+ pounds in 2016 (scale couldn’t go higher). Here is his monthly progress since we started Frank Walks (679 days in a row and counting): 383 pounds before walking daily Weigh in 1: 373 pounds Weigh in 2: 352 pounds Weigh in 3: 343 pounds Weigh in 4: 340 pounds Weigh in 5: 339 pounds Weigh in 6: 333.8 pounds Weigh in 7: 331 pounds Weigh in 8: 323.8 pounds Weigh in 9: 319.8 pounds Weigh in 10: 324 pounds Weigh in 11: 330 pounds Weigh in 12: 327.8 pounds Weigh in 13: 318.5 pounds Weigh in 14: 321.8 pounds Weigh in 15: 326 pounds Weigh in 16: 314 pounds Weigh in 17: 316 pounds Weigh in 18: 312.5 pounds Weigh in 19: 315 pounds Weigh in 20: 307.5 pounds Weigh in 21: 306 A couple of weeks ago, Frank hit 299.5, dipping below 300 for the first time since Bill Clinton was the President. Here are the results from weigh in 22: ◦297.8 pounds - Frank has lost 225+ pounds since his all time high ◦Blood sugar: A1C is 5.7% down from 11.1% (years of life expectancy 12+ 📈) Accepting the fact that “stress eating” is not a valid excuse for undermining hard work is critical. Frank easily gets stressed and he has to stop turning to food in those moments, especially when he’s alone. He’s been crushing his walks and exercise. He’s the lightest he’s been since the 1990’s and he is capable of doing things he never thought was possible. For example, catching a pass from Eli Manning last week and running down a football field. Best of all, it is inspiring others. Now, it’s time to hit the weights more and continue to improve diet across the board. No excuses. One day at a time. Congrats, Frank! Thank you Tank’s Army! Anudder weigh in in the books

Matthew Piper Jenks 🧲

1,163,324 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr