正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

The case for Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) is built on a simple, powerful premise: you are replacing what the body is naturally losing. Renowned medical expert and FDA commissioner Dr. Marty Makary highlights a pivotal observation from the 1950s Mayo Clinic: when young women had their ovaries removed, they...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

395,879 subscribers

65,488 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生科学技术教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Women have been misled by medical dogma for decades. It's time for the truth about Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT). As Dr. Marty Makary explains, the pervasive fear that HRT increases a woman's risk of dying from breast cancer is not supported by clinical trial data. This critical misunderstanding has robbed countless women of profound health benefits. The short-term relief from perimenopause symptoms—like hot flashes, night sweats, and mood swings—is well-known. But the long-term benefits are truly staggering and largely underappreciated: ✅ Cuts the risk of heart attacks by 25-50% (the #1 killer of women). ✅ Reduces the risk of cognitive decline & Alzheimer's by up to 64%. ✅ Slashes the risk of osteoporosis and debilitating bone fractures in half. When initiated within 10 years of perimenopause, HRT may be one of the most impactful preventive medications in modern history for improving women's long-term health outcomes on a population level. Yet, as Dr. Makary points out, it remains underrecognized, underappreciated, and underfunded. This is a pivotal issue in women's health that demands attention. Every woman deserves to know the real data, beyond the outdated dogma, to make an informed decision with her doctor.
2:39

Women have been misled by medical dogma for decades. It's time for the truth about Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT). As Dr. Marty Makary explains, the pervasive fear that HRT increases a woman's risk of dying from breast cancer is not supported by clinical trial data. This critical misunderstanding has robbed countless women of profound health benefits. The short-term relief from perimenopause symptoms—like hot flashes, night sweats, and mood swings—is well-known. But the long-term benefits are truly staggering and largely underappreciated: ✅ Cuts the risk of heart attacks by 25-50% (the #1 killer of women). ✅ Reduces the risk of cognitive decline & Alzheimer's by up to 64%. ✅ Slashes the risk of osteoporosis and debilitating bone fractures in half. When initiated within 10 years of perimenopause, HRT may be one of the most impactful preventive medications in modern history for improving women's long-term health outcomes on a population level. Yet, as Dr. Makary points out, it remains underrecognized, underappreciated, and underfunded. This is a pivotal issue in women's health that demands attention. Every woman deserves to know the real data, beyond the outdated dogma, to make an informed decision with her doctor.

Camus

83,549 次观看 • 11 个月前

I often have women messaging me to ask if there is a cut off age for taking HRT, or to ask what age they need to stop HRT. The answer is that there is usually no set length of time you should take HRT for - the menopause is a long-term hormone deficiency so women can usually take HRT forever to replace these missing hormones. However, after the Women’s Health Initiative Study was published in 2002, many women have resisted taking HRT, especially after age 65 years, because of fears of perceived risks. However, a new study has been published today showing that these fears are unfounded. The study also showed that women who took oestrogen only HRT beyond the age of 65 was associated with significant risk reductions in mortality, breast cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, congestive heart failure, venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, and dementia. There were also benefits to future health in women who took combination oestrogen and progesterone. The most benefit was with transdermal oestradiol and progesterone. If you haven’t yet read the study, I would really recommend you do. The link is here: It’s also worth listening to this podcast I recorded with Dr Anna Chiles who is a GP and works with us at Newson Health as a menopause specialist, as we talk more about continuing HRT for many years during that: This article we have on our @balancemenopause website is also worth a read:
0:48

I often have women messaging me to ask if there is a cut off age for taking HRT, or to ask what age they need to stop HRT. The answer is that there is usually no set length of time you should take HRT for - the menopause is a long-term hormone deficiency so women can usually take HRT forever to replace these missing hormones. However, after the Women’s Health Initiative Study was published in 2002, many women have resisted taking HRT, especially after age 65 years, because of fears of perceived risks. However, a new study has been published today showing that these fears are unfounded. The study also showed that women who took oestrogen only HRT beyond the age of 65 was associated with significant risk reductions in mortality, breast cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, congestive heart failure, venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, and dementia. There were also benefits to future health in women who took combination oestrogen and progesterone. The most benefit was with transdermal oestradiol and progesterone. If you haven’t yet read the study, I would really recommend you do. The link is here: It’s also worth listening to this podcast I recorded with Dr Anna Chiles who is a GP and works with us at Newson Health as a menopause specialist, as we talk more about continuing HRT for many years during that: This article we have on our @balancemenopause website is also worth a read:

Dr Louise Newson

95,490 次观看 • 2 年前

For most women, the benefits of taking body identical HRT far outweigh any risks. Yet many are reluctant to take it and many doctors are also reluctant to prescribe it. This is usually due to a false belief that HRT is too risky and causes breast cancer. I am sharing with you this paper that has recently been published looking at oestrogen-only HRT and breast cancer incidence. The paper is a meta-analysis, which is a type of statistical analysis where researchers review, combine, and analyse multiple studies together. In this paper, researchers have looked at randomised studies involving oestrogen and breast cancer incidence and put them together to see what the results show. The conclusion is clear: women who take oestrogen-only HRT have a LOWER future risk of developing breast cancer. We’ve known for several years that women who take oestrogen have a lower future incidence of breast cancer as well as other cancers and other conditions. This paper is very reassuring, and it’s worth remembering that any risk of breast cancer has been shown using oestrogen with a combination of a synthetic progestogen, not the body-identical type progesterone healthcare professionals usually prescribe.
1:31

For most women, the benefits of taking body identical HRT far outweigh any risks. Yet many are reluctant to take it and many doctors are also reluctant to prescribe it. This is usually due to a false belief that HRT is too risky and causes breast cancer. I am sharing with you this paper that has recently been published looking at oestrogen-only HRT and breast cancer incidence. The paper is a meta-analysis, which is a type of statistical analysis where researchers review, combine, and analyse multiple studies together. In this paper, researchers have looked at randomised studies involving oestrogen and breast cancer incidence and put them together to see what the results show. The conclusion is clear: women who take oestrogen-only HRT have a LOWER future risk of developing breast cancer. We’ve known for several years that women who take oestrogen have a lower future incidence of breast cancer as well as other cancers and other conditions. This paper is very reassuring, and it’s worth remembering that any risk of breast cancer has been shown using oestrogen with a combination of a synthetic progestogen, not the body-identical type progesterone healthcare professionals usually prescribe.

Dr Louise Newson

23,788 次观看 • 2 年前

In the UK, only around 14% of menopausal women take HRT and this number usually shocks people. But as you can hear Dr Mary Claire Haver talk about here - in the US it is only 4% now, when just over 20 years ago it was around 40%. Much of this reduction in HRT use and the negativity regarding HRT stems from the misinterpretation of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study which was published in 2002. For those of you who don’t know much about this, in 1993, the WHI began a clinical trial looking at the health effects of women taking oestrogen-only or combined HRT compared to a placebo. In 2002, researchers halted the part of the study looking at women taking both oestrogen and progesterone (two hormones that decline during the perimenopause onwards) early over concerns there were small increased risks of breast cancer, heart disease, strokes and blood clots. This led to confusion and concern from doctors and women worldwide, and in the UK women taking HRT fell sharply. But even with the older versions of HRT, the WHI researchers have subsequently acknowledged that HRT is the most effective treatment for managing menopausal symptoms like hot flushes and that taking oestrogen alone reduces the risk of breast cancer by 23% and death by breast cancer by 40%. It is time we move on from the misinterpretation of this study and allow more women to access hormone replacement if that is what they want.
1:19

In the UK, only around 14% of menopausal women take HRT and this number usually shocks people. But as you can hear Dr Mary Claire Haver talk about here - in the US it is only 4% now, when just over 20 years ago it was around 40%. Much of this reduction in HRT use and the negativity regarding HRT stems from the misinterpretation of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study which was published in 2002. For those of you who don’t know much about this, in 1993, the WHI began a clinical trial looking at the health effects of women taking oestrogen-only or combined HRT compared to a placebo. In 2002, researchers halted the part of the study looking at women taking both oestrogen and progesterone (two hormones that decline during the perimenopause onwards) early over concerns there were small increased risks of breast cancer, heart disease, strokes and blood clots. This led to confusion and concern from doctors and women worldwide, and in the UK women taking HRT fell sharply. But even with the older versions of HRT, the WHI researchers have subsequently acknowledged that HRT is the most effective treatment for managing menopausal symptoms like hot flushes and that taking oestrogen alone reduces the risk of breast cancer by 23% and death by breast cancer by 40%. It is time we move on from the misinterpretation of this study and allow more women to access hormone replacement if that is what they want.

Dr Louise Newson

39,122 次观看 • 2 年前

Penelope Cruz on perimenopause: “It can last 10, 12 years. It can start as early as 40.” Hormones spike wildly, estrogen from 30 to 500, causing cysts and crazy ups and downs. She was told at 41 and thought it was a bad joke. “People have to know because you have to prepare yourself. God bless bioidentical hormones.” Perimenopause is the transition to menopause, often starting in the 40s and lasting 4-10+ years, with fluctuating estrogen and progesterone causing symptoms like hot flashes, mood swings, and cysts. Bioidentical hormones are chemically identical to those the body produces, potentially offering a more natural option for symptom relief with fewer side effects than traditional HRT, though individual response varies and medical supervision is essential. A candid, important conversation about a stage many women face.
1:01

Penelope Cruz on perimenopause: “It can last 10, 12 years. It can start as early as 40.” Hormones spike wildly, estrogen from 30 to 500, causing cysts and crazy ups and downs. She was told at 41 and thought it was a bad joke. “People have to know because you have to prepare yourself. God bless bioidentical hormones.” Perimenopause is the transition to menopause, often starting in the 40s and lasting 4-10+ years, with fluctuating estrogen and progesterone causing symptoms like hot flashes, mood swings, and cysts. Bioidentical hormones are chemically identical to those the body produces, potentially offering a more natural option for symptom relief with fewer side effects than traditional HRT, though individual response varies and medical supervision is essential. A candid, important conversation about a stage many women face.

Camus

105,471 次观看 • 1 个月前

FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary calls the demonization of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for postmenopausal women “the biggest screw-up of modern medicine.” Key points from his explosive take: - A misinterpreted 2002 NIH study (led by a Fauci-like figure) claimed HRT causes breast cancer — but the increase was not statistically significant, and no subsequent study has shown increased breast cancer mortality. - Women were scared off a treatment that dramatically improves quality of life and extends life. - Benefits include: - 25–50% lower risk of fatal heart attacks (leading killer in women) - ~90% reduction in osteoporosis risk - Prevention of cognitive decline - Relief from severe symptoms lasting ~8 years on average (hot flashes, night sweats, mood swings, painful sex, weight gain) - Marriages have been saved, lives improved — yet doctors were trained to dismiss symptoms as “tough it out” or prescribe antidepressants instead. - Starting HRT within ~10 years of menopause (ideally ~50) maximizes benefits and safety; after ~60, the risk-benefit shifts. Makary: This was dogma, not data — and it cost women decades of health. The tide is turning. Are you (or someone you know) reconsidering HRT after this? Raw, no-filter truth about one of the largest medical reversals in history
5:46

FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary calls the demonization of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for postmenopausal women “the biggest screw-up of modern medicine.” Key points from his explosive take: - A misinterpreted 2002 NIH study (led by a Fauci-like figure) claimed HRT causes breast cancer — but the increase was not statistically significant, and no subsequent study has shown increased breast cancer mortality. - Women were scared off a treatment that dramatically improves quality of life and extends life. - Benefits include: - 25–50% lower risk of fatal heart attacks (leading killer in women) - ~90% reduction in osteoporosis risk - Prevention of cognitive decline - Relief from severe symptoms lasting ~8 years on average (hot flashes, night sweats, mood swings, painful sex, weight gain) - Marriages have been saved, lives improved — yet doctors were trained to dismiss symptoms as “tough it out” or prescribe antidepressants instead. - Starting HRT within ~10 years of menopause (ideally ~50) maximizes benefits and safety; after ~60, the risk-benefit shifts. Makary: This was dogma, not data — and it cost women decades of health. The tide is turning. Are you (or someone you know) reconsidering HRT after this? Raw, no-filter truth about one of the largest medical reversals in history

Camus

106,410 次观看 • 5 个月前

Only around 14% of menopausal women in the UK currently are prescribed HRT, which would be fine if only 14% of women wanted to take HRT but we know this isn’t the case. I constantly hear from so many women who aren’t being given a choice and are unable to have their HRT prescribed for them both in the UK and other countries. This is not right when we know HRT is safe and beneficial for the majority of menopausal women and the guidelines are clear it is a first line treatment to manage menopausal symptoms for most women. In areas of deprivation this number is much lower - in some areas only 2% of menopausal women are prescribed HRT and these women are more likely to be prescribed antidepressants, statins and blood pressure lowering treatments. Also they are more likely to have chronic diseases such as heart disease, type 2 diabetes, clinical depression and osteoporosis - taking HRT can reduce the incidence of these diseases as well as improving symptoms. A lot of the work I do is about giving women the confidence to be better advocates for themselves and I hope by keeping this conversation going we can help more women access the care and treatment they want and deserve.
0:41

Only around 14% of menopausal women in the UK currently are prescribed HRT, which would be fine if only 14% of women wanted to take HRT but we know this isn’t the case. I constantly hear from so many women who aren’t being given a choice and are unable to have their HRT prescribed for them both in the UK and other countries. This is not right when we know HRT is safe and beneficial for the majority of menopausal women and the guidelines are clear it is a first line treatment to manage menopausal symptoms for most women. In areas of deprivation this number is much lower - in some areas only 2% of menopausal women are prescribed HRT and these women are more likely to be prescribed antidepressants, statins and blood pressure lowering treatments. Also they are more likely to have chronic diseases such as heart disease, type 2 diabetes, clinical depression and osteoporosis - taking HRT can reduce the incidence of these diseases as well as improving symptoms. A lot of the work I do is about giving women the confidence to be better advocates for themselves and I hope by keeping this conversation going we can help more women access the care and treatment they want and deserve.

Dr Louise Newson

25,232 次观看 • 3 年前

If you’ve seen the headlines this morning debating whether menopause is a disease and being over-medicalised, this video explains my thoughts. Menopause is more than a collection of symptoms; it is a cardiometabolic and inflammatory condition which leads to an increased risk of numerous diseases. Menopause has been ‘medicalised’ for years – including with antidepressants, antipsychotics, painkillers, sleeping tablets, anticholinergics to treat bladder symptoms, and heart medications to lower cholesterol, reduce blood pressure and control palpitations. The first-line treatment for menopausal symptoms is body-identical HRT. Studies have shown that when women are given the right dose and type of hormones, their symptoms improve, and they have a lower future risk of numerous long-term inflammatory diseases associated with menopause including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, dementia, and depression as well as early death. Talking about menopause as being a ‘natural transition’ or part of ‘healthy ageing’ ignores the very real suffering of many women with menopausal symptoms.
1:37

If you’ve seen the headlines this morning debating whether menopause is a disease and being over-medicalised, this video explains my thoughts. Menopause is more than a collection of symptoms; it is a cardiometabolic and inflammatory condition which leads to an increased risk of numerous diseases. Menopause has been ‘medicalised’ for years – including with antidepressants, antipsychotics, painkillers, sleeping tablets, anticholinergics to treat bladder symptoms, and heart medications to lower cholesterol, reduce blood pressure and control palpitations. The first-line treatment for menopausal symptoms is body-identical HRT. Studies have shown that when women are given the right dose and type of hormones, their symptoms improve, and they have a lower future risk of numerous long-term inflammatory diseases associated with menopause including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, dementia, and depression as well as early death. Talking about menopause as being a ‘natural transition’ or part of ‘healthy ageing’ ignores the very real suffering of many women with menopausal symptoms.

Dr Louise Newson

59,409 次观看 • 2 年前

For anyone reading the headlines about HRT and dementia this morning, please watch this. The study referenced is an observational study so does not prove cause and effect. Also, it’s mainly looking at women who are taking older types of HRT which are very different to the types of HRT we prescribe now. Other studies have shown that people who take body identical HRT have a lower risk of dementia. What it does show is that we urgently need to do more research in this area.
0:50

For anyone reading the headlines about HRT and dementia this morning, please watch this. The study referenced is an observational study so does not prove cause and effect. Also, it’s mainly looking at women who are taking older types of HRT which are very different to the types of HRT we prescribe now. Other studies have shown that people who take body identical HRT have a lower risk of dementia. What it does show is that we urgently need to do more research in this area.

Dr Louise Newson

271,584 次观看 • 3 年前

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong: "The Disease of Cancer is a Symptom. The Root Cause is a Collapse of the Immune System." A startling discovery is changing everything we know about cancer and longevity. The key isn't found in a new drug, but in a simple, often-ignored number on your blood test: the Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC). As Dr. Soon-Shiong explains, if your ALC drops below 1000 cells/μL (a condition known as lymphopenia), the statistical risk of a shortened lifespan increases dramatically. This isn't a new theory; it's a clinical fact supported by hundreds of publications spanning decades. The data is undeniable: whether for breast, lung, pancreatic, or any other cancer, lymphopenia consistently predicts a significantly worse outcome. The reason is profound in its simplicity. Your ALC is your immune army. These lymphocytes and T-cells are your body's only dedicated soldiers to fight infection, prevent cancer, and stop metastasis. A low count means the front line is defenseless. We have been treating the symptom—the tumor—while ignoring the root cause. The disease is not the cancer; the cancer is a symptom of a failed immune system. This is a fundamental paradigm shift. The future of medicine lies in treating the host, not just the disease. By restoring immune competence, we don't just attack one illness; we empower the body to defend itself against many. It is a simple, yet profound, unlocking of a new era in healthcare.
1:56

Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong: "The Disease of Cancer is a Symptom. The Root Cause is a Collapse of the Immune System." A startling discovery is changing everything we know about cancer and longevity. The key isn't found in a new drug, but in a simple, often-ignored number on your blood test: the Absolute Lymphocyte Count (ALC). As Dr. Soon-Shiong explains, if your ALC drops below 1000 cells/μL (a condition known as lymphopenia), the statistical risk of a shortened lifespan increases dramatically. This isn't a new theory; it's a clinical fact supported by hundreds of publications spanning decades. The data is undeniable: whether for breast, lung, pancreatic, or any other cancer, lymphopenia consistently predicts a significantly worse outcome. The reason is profound in its simplicity. Your ALC is your immune army. These lymphocytes and T-cells are your body's only dedicated soldiers to fight infection, prevent cancer, and stop metastasis. A low count means the front line is defenseless. We have been treating the symptom—the tumor—while ignoring the root cause. The disease is not the cancer; the cancer is a symptom of a failed immune system. This is a fundamental paradigm shift. The future of medicine lies in treating the host, not just the disease. By restoring immune competence, we don't just attack one illness; we empower the body to defend itself against many. It is a simple, yet profound, unlocking of a new era in healthcare.

Camus

281,744 次观看 • 1 年前

The Pillars of Cancer Treatment Are a Lie. Chemo and Radiation Aren't Just Brutal—They're Actively Destroying Your Natural Killer Cells, the Very Thing Standing Between You and Cancer. A stunning revelation from Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong that reframes our entire battle against cancer. He shares a truth 460 million years in the making. Within every one of us is an ancient gift, a cell bestowed by the very process of creation: the Natural Killer (NK) cell. Dr. Soon-Shiong explains that this cell is our fundamental biological shield, the key reason humanity has survived infection, trauma, and cancer across millennia. Yet, for decades, modern medicine has waged a devastating war on this very protector. How? With the very pillars of our oncological arsenal: high-dose chemotherapy, radiation, steroid therapy, and even newer modalities. These treatments, while aimed at cancer, systematically destroy the NK cells designed to defend us. A single dose of radiation can obliterate this natural defense for a year, leaving patients vulnerable. Dr. Soon-Shiong presents a paradigm-shattering question: What if, instead of attacking the body’s innate protection, we learned to unlock and unleash it? The answer is here. After a lifetime of research, a method has been discovered and approved to activate the body as its own factory. A single intervention—a “bio-shield”—that proliferates these natural killer cells, empowering them to do what they were designed to do: protect you from cancer. The results? Real patients with bladder cancer, free of disease for a decade. This is not a future promise. This is a present reality, approved in 2024. Dr. Soon-Shiong credits the current administration for its role in moving this breakthrough forward for the entire nation. The era of destroying the body to save it is ending. The era of activating our 460-million-year-old innate defense has begun.
2:58

The Pillars of Cancer Treatment Are a Lie. Chemo and Radiation Aren't Just Brutal—They're Actively Destroying Your Natural Killer Cells, the Very Thing Standing Between You and Cancer. A stunning revelation from Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong that reframes our entire battle against cancer. He shares a truth 460 million years in the making. Within every one of us is an ancient gift, a cell bestowed by the very process of creation: the Natural Killer (NK) cell. Dr. Soon-Shiong explains that this cell is our fundamental biological shield, the key reason humanity has survived infection, trauma, and cancer across millennia. Yet, for decades, modern medicine has waged a devastating war on this very protector. How? With the very pillars of our oncological arsenal: high-dose chemotherapy, radiation, steroid therapy, and even newer modalities. These treatments, while aimed at cancer, systematically destroy the NK cells designed to defend us. A single dose of radiation can obliterate this natural defense for a year, leaving patients vulnerable. Dr. Soon-Shiong presents a paradigm-shattering question: What if, instead of attacking the body’s innate protection, we learned to unlock and unleash it? The answer is here. After a lifetime of research, a method has been discovered and approved to activate the body as its own factory. A single intervention—a “bio-shield”—that proliferates these natural killer cells, empowering them to do what they were designed to do: protect you from cancer. The results? Real patients with bladder cancer, free of disease for a decade. This is not a future promise. This is a present reality, approved in 2024. Dr. Soon-Shiong credits the current administration for its role in moving this breakthrough forward for the entire nation. The era of destroying the body to save it is ending. The era of activating our 460-million-year-old innate defense has begun.

Camus

150,992 次观看 • 10 个月前

FDA Commissioner Marty Makary: The American food system has failed our kids “ Look at the fact that 40% of American kids have a chronic disease.” “Between the lines in the medical textbooks and medical school was kind of a blaming of children for not having the discipline, and it's not a willpower problem.” “This is highly addictive, chemicalized foods that are ultra processed, that are put in front of kids and they want more. And you put these vibrant colors in them from the petroleum-based eyes.” “And so this is something adults have done to kids.” “I think that we have failed. We've given people the wrong information, that calories in equals calories out. This demonization of fat and all that stuff we talked about.” “GLP-1s are mimicking a natural hormone in the body, and so when you get a supplementation of that, it's doing the job of increasing satiety, slowing down GI motility, and it has a profound impact on a number of conditions because you are also reducing insulin resistance and general body inflammation.” “And so, that's why we're seeing so many other benefits.” “Plus, you feel better. When you feel better, you're gonna have benefits we haven't even appreciated yet, because there's an incredible value to positive thinking.” Marty Makary MD, MPH Dr. Marty Makary
1:20

FDA Commissioner Marty Makary: The American food system has failed our kids “ Look at the fact that 40% of American kids have a chronic disease.” “Between the lines in the medical textbooks and medical school was kind of a blaming of children for not having the discipline, and it's not a willpower problem.” “This is highly addictive, chemicalized foods that are ultra processed, that are put in front of kids and they want more. And you put these vibrant colors in them from the petroleum-based eyes.” “And so this is something adults have done to kids.” “I think that we have failed. We've given people the wrong information, that calories in equals calories out. This demonization of fat and all that stuff we talked about.” “GLP-1s are mimicking a natural hormone in the body, and so when you get a supplementation of that, it's doing the job of increasing satiety, slowing down GI motility, and it has a profound impact on a number of conditions because you are also reducing insulin resistance and general body inflammation.” “And so, that's why we're seeing so many other benefits.” “Plus, you feel better. When you feel better, you're gonna have benefits we haven't even appreciated yet, because there's an incredible value to positive thinking.” Marty Makary MD, MPH Dr. Marty Makary

The All-In Podcast

46,964 次观看 • 6 个月前

A New Dawn in the Cancer War: Pioneering "BioShield" Technology Achieves Long-Term Remission Where Others Failed A stunning revelation from Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong on the dawn of a new medical era. He details a breakthrough he calls "BioShield," a technology designed to prevent cancer by fundamentally educating the body's own immune system. Forget conventional vaccines. This isn't about antibodies. This is about creating a living, intelligent defense system within you. Here’s the concept: "BioShield" educates your T-cells to become elite "memory" cells. They then hide in your bone marrow, lying in wait. When a cancerous cell appears, they emerge to seek and destroy it—stopping cancer before it can ever gain a foothold. This isn't science fiction. It's peer-reviewed, published science with the National Cancer Institute (NCI). And the results are nothing short of remarkable: ➡️ Bladder Cancer: Patients who failed all other treatments and faced radical bladder removal have achieved complete remission for nine years after a simple injection. No surgery. Just a functional cure. ➡️ Pancreatic Cancer: A disease with a grim prognosis, now seeing patients disease-free for five years. The late Senator Harry Reid, after being told by others not to pursue it, saw his tumor markers normalize and lived two active, cancer-free years. ➡️ Merkel Cell Carcinoma & Head/Neck Cancer: Stories of complete responses in patients given weeks to live, with one living nine years and another saved from hospice when his ulcerating tumor melted away. Dr. Soon-Shiong is reframing the conversation. This isn't a "vaccine" in the traditional sense. It's Project BioShield—a proactive, cellular guardian for the body. The takeaway? We are transitioning from toxic, reactive cancer therapies to intelligent, preemptive protection. The age of the immune system as our most powerful shield against cancer has arrived. What are your thoughts on this "BioShield" approach to cancer?
5:12

A New Dawn in the Cancer War: Pioneering "BioShield" Technology Achieves Long-Term Remission Where Others Failed A stunning revelation from Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong on the dawn of a new medical era. He details a breakthrough he calls "BioShield," a technology designed to prevent cancer by fundamentally educating the body's own immune system. Forget conventional vaccines. This isn't about antibodies. This is about creating a living, intelligent defense system within you. Here’s the concept: "BioShield" educates your T-cells to become elite "memory" cells. They then hide in your bone marrow, lying in wait. When a cancerous cell appears, they emerge to seek and destroy it—stopping cancer before it can ever gain a foothold. This isn't science fiction. It's peer-reviewed, published science with the National Cancer Institute (NCI). And the results are nothing short of remarkable: ➡️ Bladder Cancer: Patients who failed all other treatments and faced radical bladder removal have achieved complete remission for nine years after a simple injection. No surgery. Just a functional cure. ➡️ Pancreatic Cancer: A disease with a grim prognosis, now seeing patients disease-free for five years. The late Senator Harry Reid, after being told by others not to pursue it, saw his tumor markers normalize and lived two active, cancer-free years. ➡️ Merkel Cell Carcinoma & Head/Neck Cancer: Stories of complete responses in patients given weeks to live, with one living nine years and another saved from hospice when his ulcerating tumor melted away. Dr. Soon-Shiong is reframing the conversation. This isn't a "vaccine" in the traditional sense. It's Project BioShield—a proactive, cellular guardian for the body. The takeaway? We are transitioning from toxic, reactive cancer therapies to intelligent, preemptive protection. The age of the immune system as our most powerful shield against cancer has arrived. What are your thoughts on this "BioShield" approach to cancer?

Camus

31,209 次观看 • 9 个月前

A catastrophic wave of iatrogenic illness is sweeping through the medical community itself. Thousands of doctors who complied with the COVID-19 vaccine mandates are now becoming patients, suffering from sudden heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, and aggressive "turbo cancers." As Dr. Makis states: "99% of doctors took the shots. They went all in on the COVID vaccine fraud, and now they are paying the price." The consequences are dire and already unfolding: - A Silent Plea for Help: Vaccine-injured physicians are now seeking help in secret, ashamed to admit their injuries. They are quietly asking for treatments like Ivermectin and Fenbendazole. - The Great Retirement: Instead of working into their 70s, doctors in their 40s are closing their practices and retiring early due to debilitating health issues. We are losing our most experienced caregivers at an alarming rate. This is not a simple staffing shortage. This is a systemic collapse of the human capital within medicine. So, what will fill this void? It won't be foreign doctors or new graduates. The system is breaking too fast. The replacement is already being prepared: Artificial Intelligence. Within the next five years, AI will begin its rapid integration into clinical practice, not as a tool for doctors, but as their replacement. The mass disabling of the medical profession is creating the vacuum that technology is poised to fill. The digital transformation of medicine is coming, and it is being accelerated by a tragic, man-made health crisis. The frontline has shifted from the ICU to the very integrity of the medical profession.
1:37

A catastrophic wave of iatrogenic illness is sweeping through the medical community itself. Thousands of doctors who complied with the COVID-19 vaccine mandates are now becoming patients, suffering from sudden heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, and aggressive "turbo cancers." As Dr. Makis states: "99% of doctors took the shots. They went all in on the COVID vaccine fraud, and now they are paying the price." The consequences are dire and already unfolding: - A Silent Plea for Help: Vaccine-injured physicians are now seeking help in secret, ashamed to admit their injuries. They are quietly asking for treatments like Ivermectin and Fenbendazole. - The Great Retirement: Instead of working into their 70s, doctors in their 40s are closing their practices and retiring early due to debilitating health issues. We are losing our most experienced caregivers at an alarming rate. This is not a simple staffing shortage. This is a systemic collapse of the human capital within medicine. So, what will fill this void? It won't be foreign doctors or new graduates. The system is breaking too fast. The replacement is already being prepared: Artificial Intelligence. Within the next five years, AI will begin its rapid integration into clinical practice, not as a tool for doctors, but as their replacement. The mass disabling of the medical profession is creating the vacuum that technology is poised to fill. The digital transformation of medicine is coming, and it is being accelerated by a tragic, man-made health crisis. The frontline has shifted from the ICU to the very integrity of the medical profession.

Camus

310,653 次观看 • 10 个月前

Has Modern Oncology Been Winning the Battle, Only to Lose the War on Cancer? The devastating trade-off where shrinking a tumor today can mean destroying the body's natural defenses against metastasis tomorrow. In a stunning and sobering exchange, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong delivered a paradigm-shattering critique of conventional cancer care to Megyn Kelly. For decades, the medical establishment has celebrated "response rates"—the initial shrinking of a tumor through chemotherapy and radiation. But Dr. Soon-Shiong reveals a devastating trade-off: these treatments annihilate the body's very own elite defense forces—the NK cells and T-cells. These are the same cells that provide long-term immunity and are critical for preventing metastasis. The result? A short-term victory that often paves the way for long-term defeat. The tumor may retreat, but the patient's primary defense against its return is wiped out. This revelation leads to a heartbreaking reality in Dr. Soon-Shiong's clinic. With a waiting list of over 10,000 patients and only capacity for 20-30 at a time, he is forced to say "no" to thousands. Each refusal, he admits, fills him with despair, as he knows the likely consequence for those denied his cell-based immunotherapy program. His conclusion is a powerful call to action: this life-saving technology shouldn't be locked away in a single clinic. As he states, it could be made available to the entire nation "by a stroke of a pen." This isn't just a medical interview; it's a profound challenge to a 40-year-old standard of care and a plea for a new approach that prioritizes the body's innate ability to heal and remember over short-term, often illusory, gains.
1:52

Has Modern Oncology Been Winning the Battle, Only to Lose the War on Cancer? The devastating trade-off where shrinking a tumor today can mean destroying the body's natural defenses against metastasis tomorrow. In a stunning and sobering exchange, Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong delivered a paradigm-shattering critique of conventional cancer care to Megyn Kelly. For decades, the medical establishment has celebrated "response rates"—the initial shrinking of a tumor through chemotherapy and radiation. But Dr. Soon-Shiong reveals a devastating trade-off: these treatments annihilate the body's very own elite defense forces—the NK cells and T-cells. These are the same cells that provide long-term immunity and are critical for preventing metastasis. The result? A short-term victory that often paves the way for long-term defeat. The tumor may retreat, but the patient's primary defense against its return is wiped out. This revelation leads to a heartbreaking reality in Dr. Soon-Shiong's clinic. With a waiting list of over 10,000 patients and only capacity for 20-30 at a time, he is forced to say "no" to thousands. Each refusal, he admits, fills him with despair, as he knows the likely consequence for those denied his cell-based immunotherapy program. His conclusion is a powerful call to action: this life-saving technology shouldn't be locked away in a single clinic. As he states, it could be made available to the entire nation "by a stroke of a pen." This isn't just a medical interview; it's a profound challenge to a 40-year-old standard of care and a plea for a new approach that prioritizes the body's innate ability to heal and remember over short-term, often illusory, gains.

Camus

122,381 次观看 • 9 个月前

The Taliban's treatment of Afghan women is not just a violation of human rights; it's a barbaric regression into a dark age where women are stripped of their humanity. The world has watched in horror as videos surfaced showing Taliban fighters publicly flogging a woman for the 'crime' of listening to music, all while chanting "Allahu Akbar" as if to sanctify their brutality. This act isn't just about enforcing a twisted interpretation of religious law; it's about dehumanizing and controlling women to the point where they are mere shadows in their own country. Contrast this with the treatment of foreign women in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. These women can drive, enjoy leisure activities, and even pose for photos with Taliban members, smiling and carefree. This stark disparity isn't just hypocrisy; it's a deliberate strategy to isolate Afghan women, making them invisible and voiceless in their own land. The Taliban's recent decree that even the sound of a woman's voice is haram (forbidden) when heard by men outside her family, and their ban on discussing women's issues in the media, underscores a chilling intent to erase women from public life entirely. They've gone so far as to declare that questioning their policies on women is off-limits until further notice. This isn't governance; it's gender apartheid. The Taliban's actions are a calculated war on half of Afghanistan's population, aimed at reducing women to non-entities. They've not only barred women from education, work, and public spaces but are now attempting to mute their very existence. The international community's response has been tepid at best, which is not only a betrayal of Afghan women but also a dangerous signal to other regimes contemplating similar oppression. The world must not remain silent or complacent. This isn't just an Afghan issue; it's a global human rights crisis. The Taliban's regime is not just oppressive; it's a vivid example of what happens when extremism is allowed to dictate policy without challenge. The global community, human rights organizations, and every individual with a voice must amplify the cries of Afghan women, not just in solidarity but in active resistance against this barbarity. Silence or diplomatic niceties in the face of such atrocities make us complicit. It's time for action, for sanctions, for a unified front against this gender persecution. The Taliban must face consequences for their crimes against humanity, and the world must ensure that Afghan women are not forgotten or forsaken.
0:22

The Taliban's treatment of Afghan women is not just a violation of human rights; it's a barbaric regression into a dark age where women are stripped of their humanity. The world has watched in horror as videos surfaced showing Taliban fighters publicly flogging a woman for the 'crime' of listening to music, all while chanting "Allahu Akbar" as if to sanctify their brutality. This act isn't just about enforcing a twisted interpretation of religious law; it's about dehumanizing and controlling women to the point where they are mere shadows in their own country. Contrast this with the treatment of foreign women in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. These women can drive, enjoy leisure activities, and even pose for photos with Taliban members, smiling and carefree. This stark disparity isn't just hypocrisy; it's a deliberate strategy to isolate Afghan women, making them invisible and voiceless in their own land. The Taliban's recent decree that even the sound of a woman's voice is haram (forbidden) when heard by men outside her family, and their ban on discussing women's issues in the media, underscores a chilling intent to erase women from public life entirely. They've gone so far as to declare that questioning their policies on women is off-limits until further notice. This isn't governance; it's gender apartheid. The Taliban's actions are a calculated war on half of Afghanistan's population, aimed at reducing women to non-entities. They've not only barred women from education, work, and public spaces but are now attempting to mute their very existence. The international community's response has been tepid at best, which is not only a betrayal of Afghan women but also a dangerous signal to other regimes contemplating similar oppression. The world must not remain silent or complacent. This isn't just an Afghan issue; it's a global human rights crisis. The Taliban's regime is not just oppressive; it's a vivid example of what happens when extremism is allowed to dictate policy without challenge. The global community, human rights organizations, and every individual with a voice must amplify the cries of Afghan women, not just in solidarity but in active resistance against this barbarity. Silence or diplomatic niceties in the face of such atrocities make us complicit. It's time for action, for sanctions, for a unified front against this gender persecution. The Taliban must face consequences for their crimes against humanity, and the world must ensure that Afghan women are not forgotten or forsaken.

Freshta Razbaan

91,543 次观看 • 2 年前

RFK Jr. is declaring an end to the FDA's "war on alternative medicine." He argues that the agency has overstepped its role, shifting from a body that provides scientific guidance to one that restricts medical freedom. Why is there a war on healing substances like stem cells, peptides, vitamins, and minerals? His solution? The FDA should do the science and inform the public, but stop acting as a gatekeeper that denies Americans and their doctors the right to choose these treatments. He points to a shocking statistic: pharmaceutical drugs are the third leading cause of death in the U.S. With this as the status quo, he questions why safe, natural alternatives are so heavily restricted. His powerful conclusion? It's time to trust the intelligence and intuition of the American people to make their own health choices, rather than leaving our well-being solely in the hands of Big Pharma.
2:28

RFK Jr. is declaring an end to the FDA's "war on alternative medicine." He argues that the agency has overstepped its role, shifting from a body that provides scientific guidance to one that restricts medical freedom. Why is there a war on healing substances like stem cells, peptides, vitamins, and minerals? His solution? The FDA should do the science and inform the public, but stop acting as a gatekeeper that denies Americans and their doctors the right to choose these treatments. He points to a shocking statistic: pharmaceutical drugs are the third leading cause of death in the U.S. With this as the status quo, he questions why safe, natural alternatives are so heavily restricted. His powerful conclusion? It's time to trust the intelligence and intuition of the American people to make their own health choices, rather than leaving our well-being solely in the hands of Big Pharma.

Camus

197,927 次观看 • 1 年前

A recent landmark case in New York awarded $2 million to a person who had her breast removed at 16. Jonathan Butcher says this case could have a ripple effect across the medical community. “According to the details of the case, the doctors involved pressured both the young lady and her parents to do this procedure without looking at what the underlying issues may be.” “And actually, this is quite common in the research that you find that those who say they were born in the wrong body often have underlying issues of anxiety and depression.” “And without dealing with those issues, you’re really not helping that young person.” “We don’t allow young people to diagnose themselves with a sprained ankle or with pneumonia or a strep throat.” “Medical associations are now saying that they opposed these surgeries to young people.” “I think that this particular case is going to have a ripple effect across the medical community.”
2:03

A recent landmark case in New York awarded $2 million to a person who had her breast removed at 16. Jonathan Butcher says this case could have a ripple effect across the medical community. “According to the details of the case, the doctors involved pressured both the young lady and her parents to do this procedure without looking at what the underlying issues may be.” “And actually, this is quite common in the research that you find that those who say they were born in the wrong body often have underlying issues of anxiety and depression.” “And without dealing with those issues, you’re really not helping that young person.” “We don’t allow young people to diagnose themselves with a sprained ankle or with pneumonia or a strep throat.” “Medical associations are now saying that they opposed these surgeries to young people.” “I think that this particular case is going to have a ripple effect across the medical community.”

Jan Jekielek

12,035 次观看 • 6 个月前