正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

“The case is not over.” Barbara McQuade explains how the Trump documents case being dismissed is actually a “blessing in disguise” for prosecutors. Trump could be re-indicted in a couple of weeks, with a different judge presiding. (Video: MSNBC)

Mike Sington

148,988 subscribers

1,984,393 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生教育新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

Mad Bull America 的头像

Mad Bull America2 年前

The administeratton illegally appointed a prosecutor. Cope harder.

AG 🔥 的头像

AG 🔥2 年前

God you guys are desperate.

Mike Ray 的头像

Mike Ray2 年前

This will get to the supreme court before that and we all know how that will go so cry harder libs

TJ - Voted For Kamala, Not the Convict 的头像

TJ - Voted For Kamala, Not the Convict2 年前

It's an ESPIONAGE case, not "documents" case.

MisterBobDobolina 的头像

MisterBobDobolina2 年前

Except…

Nuclear Herbs 的头像

Nuclear Herbs2 年前

What a great idea. Instead of having an independent special prosecutor do it, have the DOJ step in and do it. That way, nobody will think it's politically motivated at all. Genius.

MAGA Elvis 🇺🇸 的头像

MAGA Elvis 🇺🇸2 年前

Sounds like a bunch of cope

Trumpia MAGAmus Gloriosus 🇺🇸 的头像

Trumpia MAGAmus Gloriosus 🇺🇸2 年前

You can’t imprison Trump and you can’t kill Trump. All you can do at this point is take your loss with grace.

Matt Bowling 的头像

Matt Bowling2 年前

How much of our taxpayer money has been wasted trying to convict him of something?? Since day one.

Gypsy1776 的头像

Gypsy17762 年前

They just keep missing Trump!

相关视频

Judge Jeanine Pirro confuses bonds for criminal cases with a penalty in a civil case. Trump is not being criminally charged in the civil trial case. The amount he had to put up is not a bond to keep him out of prison. This is embarrassing for a lawyer and former judge.

Judge Jeanine Pirro confuses bonds for criminal cases with a penalty in a civil case. Trump is not being criminally charged in the civil trial case. The amount he had to put up is not a bond to keep him out of prison. This is embarrassing for a lawyer and former judge.

Decoding Fox News

688,788 次观看 • 2 年前

A federal judge on Monday dismissed in its entirety the classified documents case against Donald Trump, ruling that the appointment of Jack Smith as the special counsel had violated the Constitution. Our reporter explains the ruling.

A federal judge on Monday dismissed in its entirety the classified documents case against Donald Trump, ruling that the appointment of Jack Smith as the special counsel had violated the Constitution. Our reporter explains the ruling.

The New York Times

114,648 次观看 • 2 年前

.Alex Marlow explains why the handling of the Epstein case is "such a messaging failure" in contrast to Trump being a messaging "genius."

.Alex Marlow explains why the handling of the Epstein case is "such a messaging failure" in contrast to Trump being a messaging "genius."

Breitbart News

22,906 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨HUGE BREAKING: Judge Chutkan APPROVED a request by Special Counsel Jack Smith to file a 180-page brief for the election interference case that explains why Trump is NOT immune from prosecution. Trump is screwed.

🚨HUGE BREAKING: Judge Chutkan APPROVED a request by Special Counsel Jack Smith to file a 180-page brief for the election interference case that explains why Trump is NOT immune from prosecution. Trump is screwed.

Really American 🇺🇸

1,214,548 次观看 • 1 年前

Retribution is a synonym for justice in the case of President Trump. @debber66

Retribution is a synonym for justice in the case of President Trump. @debber66

Dinesh D'Souza

51,905 次观看 • 1 年前

in the latest example of how we're governed by the Make a Wish Administration, Melania Trump is presiding over a UN meeting

in the latest example of how we're governed by the Make a Wish Administration, Melania Trump is presiding over a UN meeting

Aaron Rupar

205,709 次观看 • 5 个月前

CNN Senior Legal Analyst Elie Honig explains what could happen to the Letitia James case now that a grand jury has declined to re-indict the New York Attorney General, just days after a judge dismissed the case. "They sent a message with this rejection," says Honig.

CNN Senior Legal Analyst Elie Honig explains what could happen to the Letitia James case now that a grand jury has declined to re-indict the New York Attorney General, just days after a judge dismissed the case. "They sent a message with this rejection," says Honig.

Anderson Cooper 360°

30,031 次观看 • 8 个月前

Jack Smith breaks silence, reveals he had "tons of evidence" in the criminal case against Trump that Aileen Cannon dismissed: “Both cases involved classified documents; the difference is the facts. In my particular case, we had tons of evidence of willfulness and obstructive evidence: publicly saying ‘these are my documents’ or things like that, and ‘I can keep them,’” Smith said. “The government even tried to get them back before there was a criminal investigation, and then after the investigation started, [Trump] still [refused] to give them back, and then [tried] to obstruct the investigation. That sort of evidence didn’t exist in the other case.” Smith did not investigate Biden’s classified documents case, but explained that there was no "willful retention of national defense information,” on Biden’s part or obstruction of the federal government’s attempts to retrieve documents for which Trump was indicted. “Both cases involved classified documents; the difference is the facts,” Smith said. “The rule of law allows for different outcomes when the facts are different. One of the major differences between the two cases is the obstructive conduct in the case that I investigated.”

Jack Smith breaks silence, reveals he had "tons of evidence" in the criminal case against Trump that Aileen Cannon dismissed: “Both cases involved classified documents; the difference is the facts. In my particular case, we had tons of evidence of willfulness and obstructive evidence: publicly saying ‘these are my documents’ or things like that, and ‘I can keep them,’” Smith said. “The government even tried to get them back before there was a criminal investigation, and then after the investigation started, [Trump] still [refused] to give them back, and then [tried] to obstruct the investigation. That sort of evidence didn’t exist in the other case.” Smith did not investigate Biden’s classified documents case, but explained that there was no "willful retention of national defense information,” on Biden’s part or obstruction of the federal government’s attempts to retrieve documents for which Trump was indicted. “Both cases involved classified documents; the difference is the facts,” Smith said. “The rule of law allows for different outcomes when the facts are different. One of the major differences between the two cases is the obstructive conduct in the case that I investigated.”

Bryan Dawson🇺🇸

621,662 次观看 • 9 个月前

#BREAKING:Psaki: “Tonight the judge who initially oversaw Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS, REOPENED the case, and this is a very significant development because remember, as part of his ‘settlement’, Trump voluntarily [withdrew] his case, he [withdrew] it just days before his personal lawyers and DOJ were going to be forced to explain to the judge how the heck they were actually oppositional parties, how Trump and the IRS that worked for HIS Treasury Department were on different sides…and if the judge didn’t buy their story, it could have been grounds for the judge to toss Trump’s case altogether. So instead of actually working through the court system, Trump settled out of court, again, with HIS OWN Justice Department.”🤦‍♀️

#BREAKING:Psaki: “Tonight the judge who initially oversaw Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS, REOPENED the case, and this is a very significant development because remember, as part of his ‘settlement’, Trump voluntarily [withdrew] his case, he [withdrew] it just days before his personal lawyers and DOJ were going to be forced to explain to the judge how the heck they were actually oppositional parties, how Trump and the IRS that worked for HIS Treasury Department were on different sides…and if the judge didn’t buy their story, it could have been grounds for the judge to toss Trump’s case altogether. So instead of actually working through the court system, Trump settled out of court, again, with HIS OWN Justice Department.”🤦‍♀️

Emoluments Clause

341,329 次观看 • 2 个月前

Rogue Judge Boasberg forced himself onto the AEA case while he was on vacation to stop Trump. The Supreme Court slapped him down. In a fit of rage, he is now trying to hold Trump admin officials in contempt for a case he had no jurisdiction over. The House must impeach.

Rogue Judge Boasberg forced himself onto the AEA case while he was on vacation to stop Trump. The Supreme Court slapped him down. In a fit of rage, he is now trying to hold Trump admin officials in contempt for a case he had no jurisdiction over. The House must impeach.

Eric Schmitt

666,501 次观看 • 7 个月前

JUST IN: James Comey issues statement after judge dismissed case against him "I'm grateful that the court ended the case against me, which was a prosecution based on malevolence and incompetence and a reflection of what the DOJ has become under Donald Trump, which is heartbreaking."

JUST IN: James Comey issues statement after judge dismissed case against him "I'm grateful that the court ended the case against me, which was a prosecution based on malevolence and incompetence and a reflection of what the DOJ has become under Donald Trump, which is heartbreaking."

Breaking911

231,942 次观看 • 8 个月前

🇻🇪 Maduro's in New York on his way to court The judge, is 92—year-old Alvin Hellerstein, a Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Alvin Hallerstein famously presided over the 9/11 victims litigation, the Trump case of falsification of documents and the Weinstein sexual assault cases.

🇻🇪 Maduro's in New York on his way to court The judge, is 92—year-old Alvin Hellerstein, a Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Alvin Hallerstein famously presided over the 9/11 victims litigation, the Trump case of falsification of documents and the Weinstein sexual assault cases.

Lord Bebo

41,288 次观看 • 7 个月前

Martyr Made explains why the Epstein case is a dealbreaker for many Trump supporters and may cripple the Trump administration

Martyr Made explains why the Epstein case is a dealbreaker for many Trump supporters and may cripple the Trump administration

Dr. J. Burden

46,747 次观看 • 1 年前

Statistically impossible… 🚨 Judge Merchan was “Randomly Selected” for Two of Donald Trumps Cases, from a List he Wasn’t even On • From a list of 24 sitting judges, one judge was supposed to be “randomly selected” to take this case — Judge Merchan was selected, but he wasn’t even on the List… —— “he’s an “acting judge” 🤔 • Judge Merchan is not only a Biden Donor, he donated to an organization called “Stop Trump” • Judge Merchan was “randomly selected” for the following cases — Trump Hush Money Hoax Case — Trump organization Fraud Case — Steve Bannon Case As Trump says, it’s rigged!

Statistically impossible… 🚨 Judge Merchan was “Randomly Selected” for Two of Donald Trumps Cases, from a List he Wasn’t even On • From a list of 24 sitting judges, one judge was supposed to be “randomly selected” to take this case — Judge Merchan was selected, but he wasn’t even on the List… —— “he’s an “acting judge” 🤔 • Judge Merchan is not only a Biden Donor, he donated to an organization called “Stop Trump” • Judge Merchan was “randomly selected” for the following cases — Trump Hush Money Hoax Case — Trump organization Fraud Case — Steve Bannon Case As Trump says, it’s rigged!

MJTruthUltra

1,148,965 次观看 • 2 年前

Judge Juan Merchan has ordered Donald Trump to be sentenced for 34 counts on January 10th ahead of inauguration Judge Merchan was never supposed to oversee Donald Trump’s case, he was specifically assigned the case to weaponize our legal system against Trump, here’s the proof “Understand there's absolutely no reason that Judge Merchan should have even had a chance to be assigned to this case? Now, I'm sure the left is just gonna call this a conspiracy theory. ‌ So I'll issue a challenge to them, and maybe they can tell me how he managed to be the judge. Because for these type of cases, the way it's supposed to work is that there is a panel of 24 judges, and they are all put in rotation and randomly assigned these types of cases. Judge Merchan is not on that panel. ‌ That's because he's not a judge. He's an acting judge. So even though they're trying to claim that they didn't pick the judge, that it was randomly assigned, that's not possible because judge Merchan isn't in the pool to be randomly assigned. So the only way he could have caught this case was to be specifically assigned to it. There was no chance of him being randomly selected. ‌ And the wild thing is that according to the left and the department of justice, judge Merchan was not only randomly selected to be the judge in this trial, but he was also randomly selected to be the judge in the Trump Organization case, and he was randomly selected to be the judge in the Steve Bannon case. ‌ So judge Merchan, a judge that is not in the pool of 24 judges that is supposed to catch these cases, a judge that is not an actual judge, but an acting judge caught all 3 Trump related cases randomly. This is a judge who gives heavily to an organization very plainly named Stop Trump, and a judge whose daughter makes tens of millions of dollars every year promoting Democrats. ‌ But, yeah, I'm sure this was just a coincidence. It was a coincidence that one of the most high profile cases ever, we didn't assign a judge, we assigned an acting judge. ‌ And that that judge somehow got selected even though he wasn't in the pool of judges available to be selected, and that that same judge that was selected also caught 2 other Trump related cases in the same year, and then that judge's daughter makes tens of millions of dollars a year promoting Democrats. Yeah. I'm sure that's all a coincidence.”

Wall Street Apes

514,459 次观看 • 1 年前