正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

The confidence in this man is ridiculous What makes this clip work isn't even the threat itself it's how casually he delivers it. No shouting, no dramatic buildup, no attempt to make it sound intimidating. He says it with the energy of someone who's already decided how the story... ends. And the people around him somehow make it even funnier because you can see the room trying to process what they just heard. There’s something about a person being completely serious while everyone else is laughing that makes the whole thing ten times better. This is exactly why some actors become permanently associated with a character. You can put them on a talk show, take away the movie set, and one sentence later the character somehow comes straight back.show more

ADEX🕴️

10,775 subscribers

64,389 次观看 • 5 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Watching Tim Key slowly realize the story has completely turned against him is painfully funny. 😭 Who else The timing is what makes this work. One detail leads to another, everyone on the couch joins in, and Tim Key has no way of escaping where the conversation ends up. You can actually see the moment he knows the audience is fully on everyone else's side. That's when the laughter somehow gets even louder. This is why The Graham Norton Show is so entertaining. One innocent story can turn into complete chaos without anyone forcing it, and the reactions do all the work.

Watching Tim Key slowly realize the story has completely turned against him is painfully funny. 😭 Who else The timing is what makes this work. One detail leads to another, everyone on the couch joins in, and Tim Key has no way of escaping where the conversation ends up. You can actually see the moment he knows the audience is fully on everyone else's side. That's when the laughter somehow gets even louder. This is why The Graham Norton Show is so entertaining. One innocent story can turn into complete chaos without anyone forcing it, and the reactions do all the work.

ADEX🕴️

92,298 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 Watch this leftist TikToker calmly sit on his couch and rant about “the system” keeping people weak — while casually admitting he has a FULL MANIFESTO and plans to reveal it in some “dramatic fashion” when he heads to Washington DC. No yelling. No script. Just cold, collected talk with the hand-on-chest moment with dead, soulless eyes that makes it hit harder. This is exactly how these radicals sound right before things escalate. The quiet confidence is what should concern everyone. Leftists like this aren’t hiding their intentions anymore.

🚨 Watch this leftist TikToker calmly sit on his couch and rant about “the system” keeping people weak — while casually admitting he has a FULL MANIFESTO and plans to reveal it in some “dramatic fashion” when he heads to Washington DC. No yelling. No script. Just cold, collected talk with the hand-on-chest moment with dead, soulless eyes that makes it hit harder. This is exactly how these radicals sound right before things escalate. The quiet confidence is what should concern everyone. Leftists like this aren’t hiding their intentions anymore.

DocumentingLibs

38,653 次观看 • 4 个月前

Zac Efron pauses for a second, grabs the pole, and then casually recreates a photo that looks physically impossible. Did you catch that? The impressive part isn't just getting horizontal. Watch how controlled his first movement is he finds the position almost immediately instead of scrambling to hold himself up. And he does the whole thing in a suit. The contrast between how formal he looks and what he's actually doing on that pole makes the moment even better. What makes this clip work for me is the confidence. He doesn't need a second attempt to prove the photo was real—he just gets into position and holds it.

Zac Efron pauses for a second, grabs the pole, and then casually recreates a photo that looks physically impossible. Did you catch that? The impressive part isn't just getting horizontal. Watch how controlled his first movement is he finds the position almost immediately instead of scrambling to hold himself up. And he does the whole thing in a suit. The contrast between how formal he looks and what he's actually doing on that pole makes the moment even better. What makes this clip work for me is the confidence. He doesn't need a second attempt to prove the photo was real—he just gets into position and holds it.

ADEX🕴️

453,011 次观看 • 27 天前

The second Idris Elba admits this, everyone on the couch completely loses it. Charlize Theron's face says everything before she even says a word. That reaction somehow makes the whole story even funnier. I love that nobody rushes to change the subject. They just let the awkward silence and laughter do all the work. This is exactly why Graham Norton clips never get old. One unexpected confession turns into a conversation nobody on that couch is ready for.

The second Idris Elba admits this, everyone on the couch completely loses it. Charlize Theron's face says everything before she even says a word. That reaction somehow makes the whole story even funnier. I love that nobody rushes to change the subject. They just let the awkward silence and laughter do all the work. This is exactly why Graham Norton clips never get old. One unexpected confession turns into a conversation nobody on that couch is ready for.

ADEX🕴️

277,007 次观看 • 1 个月前

Charles Dance made Tywin Lannister so intimidating that it’s easy to forget how much of that presence came from the performance. Tywin barely needed to shout. A look, a pause, or the way he delivered a sentence could make an entire room feel uncomfortable. And hearing Dance talk about playing him makes you appreciate the character differently. He wasn’t just playing a powerful man—he understood that Tywin’s real weapon was the certainty that everyone around him already knew he was in control. That’s what made Tywin so memorable. The character didn’t need to demand respect. He walked into a scene and somehow already had it.

Charles Dance made Tywin Lannister so intimidating that it’s easy to forget how much of that presence came from the performance. Tywin barely needed to shout. A look, a pause, or the way he delivered a sentence could make an entire room feel uncomfortable. And hearing Dance talk about playing him makes you appreciate the character differently. He wasn’t just playing a powerful man—he understood that Tywin’s real weapon was the certainty that everyone around him already knew he was in control. That’s what made Tywin so memorable. The character didn’t need to demand respect. He walked into a scene and somehow already had it.

🎬 JoelthegreatHQ

61,337 次观看 • 23 天前

There’s a lesson everyone needs to learn from this, if you haven’t already. What gets me isn't just this horrific sign, it's how many people let it happen. Someone designed it. Someone watched their coworker assemble it. Someone walked it through a crowd that cheered, filmed, laughed, and posted it on social media. No one stopped it. I wonder if anyone - even a single person - was uncomfortable. Did an employee try to say something? Did it even occur to them that they should? The lesson is this: even if you're the only one who sees it for what it is, say something. Do something. Don't delude yourself into thinking someone else will.

There’s a lesson everyone needs to learn from this, if you haven’t already. What gets me isn't just this horrific sign, it's how many people let it happen. Someone designed it. Someone watched their coworker assemble it. Someone walked it through a crowd that cheered, filmed, laughed, and posted it on social media. No one stopped it. I wonder if anyone - even a single person - was uncomfortable. Did an employee try to say something? Did it even occur to them that they should? The lesson is this: even if you're the only one who sees it for what it is, say something. Do something. Don't delude yourself into thinking someone else will.

liv

457,359 次观看 • 1 年前

Rodney Dangerfield could make a room lose it before you even had time to process the last joke. The way he jumps from his family, his wife, his neighborhood, his looks and his terrible luck without ever slowing down is what makes this performance so good. And Johnny Carson laughing through half the set makes it even better. You can tell he knows Rodney is about to hit him with another one before he’s even finished the previous joke. This is peak Rodney Dangerfield. The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson, 1979. Which Rodney joke from this performance would you have remembered the longest?you

Rodney Dangerfield could make a room lose it before you even had time to process the last joke. The way he jumps from his family, his wife, his neighborhood, his looks and his terrible luck without ever slowing down is what makes this performance so good. And Johnny Carson laughing through half the set makes it even better. You can tell he knows Rodney is about to hit him with another one before he’s even finished the previous joke. This is peak Rodney Dangerfield. The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson, 1979. Which Rodney joke from this performance would you have remembered the longest?you

EddyFisher Studios

16,466 次观看 • 14 天前

This is the problem with having bossbabe characters. They're not even believable, they're ridiculous. I know what the writer is trying to do. He wants to show how skilled she is, better than the titular character even, who always happens to be a white man she can easily beat. But it robs her of her own hero's journey. There's nowhere to go. She's badass. She's capable. She's fearless. She doesn't need no man. Okay fine. That's not a character anyone wants to follow. Nobody wants to see this crap. Not even the feminists themselves. There's nothing to aspire to. The Arrow was beaten down numerous times and he still perseveres. That's why he's a hero. She is perfect, a little Green Arrow Princess. Heck even her hair is perfect. Okay. Then what? Is there a story left to say? No. Just the woke and retarded message to young girls around the world that you are perfect just the way you are. And then nothing.

This is the problem with having bossbabe characters. They're not even believable, they're ridiculous. I know what the writer is trying to do. He wants to show how skilled she is, better than the titular character even, who always happens to be a white man she can easily beat. But it robs her of her own hero's journey. There's nowhere to go. She's badass. She's capable. She's fearless. She doesn't need no man. Okay fine. That's not a character anyone wants to follow. Nobody wants to see this crap. Not even the feminists themselves. There's nothing to aspire to. The Arrow was beaten down numerous times and he still perseveres. That's why he's a hero. She is perfect, a little Green Arrow Princess. Heck even her hair is perfect. Okay. Then what? Is there a story left to say? No. Just the woke and retarded message to young girls around the world that you are perfect just the way you are. And then nothing.

George Saoulidis

62,844 次观看 • 2 个月前

Michael McIntyre realizing what Grindr actually is might be one of the funniest examples of someone asking a completely innocent question and immediately regretting it. The best detail is how genuinely confused Michael is. He keeps asking questions because he clearly hasn't connected what Graham is explaining with what the app is actually for. Simon Pegg and Kylie Minogue barely need to do anything. Their reactions from the couch make Michael's confusion even funnier because they already know exactly where Graham is taking this. What makes the moment work isn't the Tinder-versus-Grindr explanation by itself. It's watching Michael slowly realize what he's been asking about in front of everyone.

Michael McIntyre realizing what Grindr actually is might be one of the funniest examples of someone asking a completely innocent question and immediately regretting it. The best detail is how genuinely confused Michael is. He keeps asking questions because he clearly hasn't connected what Graham is explaining with what the app is actually for. Simon Pegg and Kylie Minogue barely need to do anything. Their reactions from the couch make Michael's confusion even funnier because they already know exactly where Graham is taking this. What makes the moment work isn't the Tinder-versus-Grindr explanation by itself. It's watching Michael slowly realize what he's been asking about in front of everyone.

peanut butter movies 🌹

276,407 次观看 • 26 天前

With The Fifth Column 🖐 talking about common knowledge: “Common knowledge can be generated at a stroke when something is witnessed in a forum where you can witness other people witnessing it. So if something just happens in public and you can see everyone else seeing it, that gives you an instant intuition that there’s common knowledge. Humor, I suggest in one of the chapters, is a common-knowledge generator, usually of some infirmity or indignity or weakness in someone or something. And the laughter, which is conspicuous—you can hear it when someone is laughing; it interrupts their speech and breathing—at the moment of laughter, suddenly becomes common knowledge. Everyone who gets the joke suddenly realizes that someone has been taken down, and they realize that everyone else realizes it. And that’s why freedom of speech and freedom of assembly are suppressed in autocracies. The joke from the Soviet era is about the man handing out leaflets in Red Square. Of course, the KGB arrest him, take him down to headquarters, only to discover that the leaflets are blank sheets of paper. They say, ‘What is the meaning of this?’ And he says, ‘What’s there to say? It’s so obvious.’ And the reason that it was subversive is that he was generating common knowledge. Just the mere fact of trying to make something public, even if you don’t have to stipulate what it is, can generate the coordination—everyone acting together to bring down a regime.”

With The Fifth Column 🖐 talking about common knowledge: “Common knowledge can be generated at a stroke when something is witnessed in a forum where you can witness other people witnessing it. So if something just happens in public and you can see everyone else seeing it, that gives you an instant intuition that there’s common knowledge. Humor, I suggest in one of the chapters, is a common-knowledge generator, usually of some infirmity or indignity or weakness in someone or something. And the laughter, which is conspicuous—you can hear it when someone is laughing; it interrupts their speech and breathing—at the moment of laughter, suddenly becomes common knowledge. Everyone who gets the joke suddenly realizes that someone has been taken down, and they realize that everyone else realizes it. And that’s why freedom of speech and freedom of assembly are suppressed in autocracies. The joke from the Soviet era is about the man handing out leaflets in Red Square. Of course, the KGB arrest him, take him down to headquarters, only to discover that the leaflets are blank sheets of paper. They say, ‘What is the meaning of this?’ And he says, ‘What’s there to say? It’s so obvious.’ And the reason that it was subversive is that he was generating common knowledge. Just the mere fact of trying to make something public, even if you don’t have to stipulate what it is, can generate the coordination—everyone acting together to bring down a regime.”

Steven Pinker

44,931 次观看 • 2 个月前

What you're looking at started as something that most people drive past without a second thought. - Industrial - boring - overlooked And someone looked at it and saw something no one else was seeing. That's the whole game here. You don't have to invent something brand new to make serious money. You just have to see potential where everyone else sees limitations. You have to look at what already exists and imagine it just a little differently. So when you turn something familiar into something unexpected, it becomes shareable and memorable. It becomes the thing that people can't stop talking about because it's different in a world where everything feels the same. People will literally travel hours just to stay somewhere like this because different is the experience now. Nobody cares about another cookie cutter hotel room that they've seen a thousand times, but this gets filmed and posted and sent to friends with the caption "you have to see this place" And suddenly you're booked out months in advance because you gave something people can't get anywhere else. I love that the raw materials here aren't special, it's just space that was sitting there unused and cheap to acquire The success of this is found in the willingness to look at what everyone else ignored and ask "what could this become?" Instead of just accepting what currently is. That's where the opportunity is. There are thousands of: - shipping containers rotting in fields - old grain silos sitting empty - warehouses no one's using - barns that haven't been touched in decades And every single one of them could become something people would pay to experience if someone just had the vision to see it through. You don't need to build it from scratch. You just need to reimagine what's already sitting in front of you. Because the world is full of overlooked things waiting for someone to look at them differently. And I don't care if AI generated the video because the inspiration you get from it is still the same.

Chris Koerner

18,278 次观看 • 6 个月前

Pride and Prejudice – The Lake Scene A person is truly seen only when they no longer try to be perfect Some moments in cinema do not become timeless because of what a character tries to show. They become unforgettable because, for a very brief moment, the character can no longer hide who they truly are. In the BBC adaptation of Pride and Prejudice, the scene of Darcy walking out of the lake is such a moment. At first glance, it is a simple situation: A wealthy gentleman has just finished swimming and unexpectedly encounters Elizabeth Bennet. There is no declaration of love. No grand conversation. No dramatic event. Yet it is precisely this simplicity that reveals the deepest truth about Darcy’s character. Because, for the first time in the story, Darcy does not appear as the perfect gentleman society expects him to be. He has no perfectly arranged formal attire. No safe distance between himself and others. No preparation to control how people perceive him. He is simply a human being suddenly placed in a moment where there is no time to rebuild all the outer layers he usually uses to present himself. And it is at that exact moment that Elizabeth sees the real Darcy for the first time. Throughout most of the story, Darcy exists as an image. He is: a wealthy man, a proud aristocrat, someone who always maintains his composure, a person who seems unwilling to let emotion overcome reason. But that perfection also creates distance. The more Darcy tries to preserve his calm and dignity, the harder it becomes for others to see the person inside him. He is like a statue carved too perfectly: beautiful, dignified, but cold. And then water appears. Water does not take away Darcy’s qualities. It simply removes the things that conceal him. The wet shirt does not make Darcy less noble. On the contrary, it creates the first moment when he does not need his social position, clothing, or manners to prove who he is. For the first time, Elizabeth does not see “Mr. Darcy.” She sees a person. A man who can feel awkward. A man who can feel embarrassed. A man whose emotions cannot be completely controlled. This is the most beautiful paradox of the scene: Darcy becomes most attractive at the moment when he is not trying to be attractive. He becomes closest to others when he no longer maintains his distance. He becomes most real when the perfect image he has built begins to break apart. Because sometimes, what separates people is not their imperfections. It is the excessive effort to hide those imperfections. This is also why the lake scene fits perfectly with the entire spirit of Pride and Prejudice. The story is not only about love. It is about the way human beings learn to see beyond outer appearances. Elizabeth must overcome her own prejudice toward Darcy. Darcy must overcome his own pride. Both of them must let go of part of the image they created to protect themselves. Only then can they truly see each other. A person is truly seen only when they no longer try to be perfect. And perhaps that is why a moment with almost no dialogue can remain so deeply alive in the memory of viewers. Because it touches something profoundly human: We often believe we are loved when we become the best version of ourselves. But sometimes, what allows others to recognize our true beauty is the moment when we no longer have to pretend to be someone else.

Pride and Prejudice – The Lake Scene A person is truly seen only when they no longer try to be perfect Some moments in cinema do not become timeless because of what a character tries to show. They become unforgettable because, for a very brief moment, the character can no longer hide who they truly are. In the BBC adaptation of Pride and Prejudice, the scene of Darcy walking out of the lake is such a moment. At first glance, it is a simple situation: A wealthy gentleman has just finished swimming and unexpectedly encounters Elizabeth Bennet. There is no declaration of love. No grand conversation. No dramatic event. Yet it is precisely this simplicity that reveals the deepest truth about Darcy’s character. Because, for the first time in the story, Darcy does not appear as the perfect gentleman society expects him to be. He has no perfectly arranged formal attire. No safe distance between himself and others. No preparation to control how people perceive him. He is simply a human being suddenly placed in a moment where there is no time to rebuild all the outer layers he usually uses to present himself. And it is at that exact moment that Elizabeth sees the real Darcy for the first time. Throughout most of the story, Darcy exists as an image. He is: a wealthy man, a proud aristocrat, someone who always maintains his composure, a person who seems unwilling to let emotion overcome reason. But that perfection also creates distance. The more Darcy tries to preserve his calm and dignity, the harder it becomes for others to see the person inside him. He is like a statue carved too perfectly: beautiful, dignified, but cold. And then water appears. Water does not take away Darcy’s qualities. It simply removes the things that conceal him. The wet shirt does not make Darcy less noble. On the contrary, it creates the first moment when he does not need his social position, clothing, or manners to prove who he is. For the first time, Elizabeth does not see “Mr. Darcy.” She sees a person. A man who can feel awkward. A man who can feel embarrassed. A man whose emotions cannot be completely controlled. This is the most beautiful paradox of the scene: Darcy becomes most attractive at the moment when he is not trying to be attractive. He becomes closest to others when he no longer maintains his distance. He becomes most real when the perfect image he has built begins to break apart. Because sometimes, what separates people is not their imperfections. It is the excessive effort to hide those imperfections. This is also why the lake scene fits perfectly with the entire spirit of Pride and Prejudice. The story is not only about love. It is about the way human beings learn to see beyond outer appearances. Elizabeth must overcome her own prejudice toward Darcy. Darcy must overcome his own pride. Both of them must let go of part of the image they created to protect themselves. Only then can they truly see each other. A person is truly seen only when they no longer try to be perfect. And perhaps that is why a moment with almost no dialogue can remain so deeply alive in the memory of viewers. Because it touches something profoundly human: We often believe we are loved when we become the best version of ourselves. But sometimes, what allows others to recognize our true beauty is the moment when we no longer have to pretend to be someone else.

🎼🌺Music Love♥️

15,891 次观看 • 1 个月前

This one is legendary. He gets hired to roast every country on the planet, follows the assignment to the letter, and still somehow ends up fired for doing exactly what they asked. The way he builds the whole thing is so clean it’s almost unfair. You can feel him getting more and more excited the closer he gets to the line, and the room is right there with him the entire time. Some comics tell stories. This one feels like watching a guy dig his own professional grave in real time… and loving every second of it.😅 Anyone else still thinking about this set?

This one is legendary. He gets hired to roast every country on the planet, follows the assignment to the letter, and still somehow ends up fired for doing exactly what they asked. The way he builds the whole thing is so clean it’s almost unfair. You can feel him getting more and more excited the closer he gets to the line, and the room is right there with him the entire time. Some comics tell stories. This one feels like watching a guy dig his own professional grave in real time… and loving every second of it.😅 Anyone else still thinking about this set?

FireMeme

20,094 次观看 • 15 天前

Rick Rubin: "Make what you love, not what you think people will like" "If you want to live in a creative way, which will benefit everything in your life, be a better person in your family, do a better job starting a new business, it's all the same. I don't really know anything about music. It's more a way of looking at the world and wanting it to be the best it could possibly be. And doing whatever it takes to be the best it could possibly be." Rubin shares how his career happened: "From the beginning, I never thought any of the things I'm doing were possible or realistic. I just did things out of the love of them, thinking I would have real jobs. That my passion would be my hobby, and I'd have a job to support my hobby. And it just magically turned out different than that without me knowing it was possible." On why some things connect and others don't: "The stars line up at certain times for certain things to happen. Sometimes you can make something great, and it doesn't connect for whatever reason. Sometimes you make two things you think are the two best things you've ever made. One of them connects with the world. One of them doesn't. And it might not have anything to do with what's in the art. It might be that it came out the same day as something else. Or there was a bigger story at the time. There's so much to it that we don't understand." He continues: "All we can do is make something good and put it out and hope for the best. That's all there is. We never know why things work. Even if you make a piece of art and it works, you may not know why." On talent versus work ethic: "There are a lot of talented people who never make it because they don't have the work ethic. It's not just talent, talent's a piece. And you could argue for some people, the work ethic trumps the talent." Rubin explains what real collaboration is: "Having worked with a lot of bands, I see there's often this friction where people are trying to get their idea in. That's not a collaboration. A real collaboration is when everyone who's there is working together towards whatever is the best thing for the whole. Whether it's your idea or someone else's idea, it doesn't matter. If you're invested in the collaboration, you want the best idea to win. You don't want your idea to win." On what makes art great: "What makes it great is the personal. With all of its imperfections. With all of its quirkiness. That's what makes it great. How you see the world that's different from how everyone else sees the world. That's why you're an artist. That's your purpose in sharing your work with the world." He warns against being derivative: "There are these derivative voices where they're finding what they think other people want to hear, and they start saying it because they've heard other people say similar things that are now successful. Even if they have some short-term success doing that, it's not revolutionary. It doesn't change the world. It doesn't last. The people who you first see and you might not like that you come to like because you don't understand them at first, those are the ones that change the world. Those are the ones you dedicate your fandom to for life." Rubin shares his philosophy on taste: "You can't second-guess your own taste for what someone else is going to like. We're not smart enough to know what someone else is going to like. To make something thinking, 'Well, I don't really like it, but I think this group of people will like it,' it's a bad way to play the game of music or art. You have to do what's personal to you. Take it as far as you can go. Really push the boundaries. And people will resonate with it if they're supposed to resonate with it." He describes creativity as catching waves: "We're really talking about magic. The universe conspiring on our behalf if we let it. Being in this flow of catching these waves that anyone can catch. If you're trying to catch it, you're open to it, you see it coming, you take off on every chance you get. And sometimes the ride happens. It's remarkable how it happens. It doesn't come from preconception. It's not an idea. It's through the doing." Rubin explains how ideas exist in the universe: "Have you ever had that experience where you have an idea for something, you don't do it, and then six months later you see someone else has done it? It's not because they took your idea. It's that it's time for that, and you can act on it or not. The best artists are the ones who have the best antenna for this material that's available. It's coming through. The best comedians see the best jokes. They see them coming. We all live in the same world; the way you see it, you have the best joke because you see it best." He closes with how to stay open: "If we listen to what's going on around us, you can overhear a conversation in a coffee shop, and it is the setup for an idea you're working on. You hear a phrase you don't commonly use. My experience is: when you are open and looking for these clues in the world, they're happening all the time. And they're happening often right when you need them."

Rick Rubin: "Make what you love, not what you think people will like" "If you want to live in a creative way, which will benefit everything in your life, be a better person in your family, do a better job starting a new business, it's all the same. I don't really know anything about music. It's more a way of looking at the world and wanting it to be the best it could possibly be. And doing whatever it takes to be the best it could possibly be." Rubin shares how his career happened: "From the beginning, I never thought any of the things I'm doing were possible or realistic. I just did things out of the love of them, thinking I would have real jobs. That my passion would be my hobby, and I'd have a job to support my hobby. And it just magically turned out different than that without me knowing it was possible." On why some things connect and others don't: "The stars line up at certain times for certain things to happen. Sometimes you can make something great, and it doesn't connect for whatever reason. Sometimes you make two things you think are the two best things you've ever made. One of them connects with the world. One of them doesn't. And it might not have anything to do with what's in the art. It might be that it came out the same day as something else. Or there was a bigger story at the time. There's so much to it that we don't understand." He continues: "All we can do is make something good and put it out and hope for the best. That's all there is. We never know why things work. Even if you make a piece of art and it works, you may not know why." On talent versus work ethic: "There are a lot of talented people who never make it because they don't have the work ethic. It's not just talent, talent's a piece. And you could argue for some people, the work ethic trumps the talent." Rubin explains what real collaboration is: "Having worked with a lot of bands, I see there's often this friction where people are trying to get their idea in. That's not a collaboration. A real collaboration is when everyone who's there is working together towards whatever is the best thing for the whole. Whether it's your idea or someone else's idea, it doesn't matter. If you're invested in the collaboration, you want the best idea to win. You don't want your idea to win." On what makes art great: "What makes it great is the personal. With all of its imperfections. With all of its quirkiness. That's what makes it great. How you see the world that's different from how everyone else sees the world. That's why you're an artist. That's your purpose in sharing your work with the world." He warns against being derivative: "There are these derivative voices where they're finding what they think other people want to hear, and they start saying it because they've heard other people say similar things that are now successful. Even if they have some short-term success doing that, it's not revolutionary. It doesn't change the world. It doesn't last. The people who you first see and you might not like that you come to like because you don't understand them at first, those are the ones that change the world. Those are the ones you dedicate your fandom to for life." Rubin shares his philosophy on taste: "You can't second-guess your own taste for what someone else is going to like. We're not smart enough to know what someone else is going to like. To make something thinking, 'Well, I don't really like it, but I think this group of people will like it,' it's a bad way to play the game of music or art. You have to do what's personal to you. Take it as far as you can go. Really push the boundaries. And people will resonate with it if they're supposed to resonate with it." He describes creativity as catching waves: "We're really talking about magic. The universe conspiring on our behalf if we let it. Being in this flow of catching these waves that anyone can catch. If you're trying to catch it, you're open to it, you see it coming, you take off on every chance you get. And sometimes the ride happens. It's remarkable how it happens. It doesn't come from preconception. It's not an idea. It's through the doing." Rubin explains how ideas exist in the universe: "Have you ever had that experience where you have an idea for something, you don't do it, and then six months later you see someone else has done it? It's not because they took your idea. It's that it's time for that, and you can act on it or not. The best artists are the ones who have the best antenna for this material that's available. It's coming through. The best comedians see the best jokes. They see them coming. We all live in the same world; the way you see it, you have the best joke because you see it best." He closes with how to stay open: "If we listen to what's going on around us, you can overhear a conversation in a coffee shop, and it is the setup for an idea you're working on. You hear a phrase you don't commonly use. My experience is: when you are open and looking for these clues in the world, they're happening all the time. And they're happening often right when you need them."

Jaynit

109,182 次观看 • 5 个月前

Idc if you like Donald J. Trump or not the man is a father, a husband, a human being. He’s never harmed you. If you’re one of the people who think what happened yesterday is okay or “he deserved it” you’re a sick person, and need help. How about you stop being a vile human being and start doing what you can to make this a better country instead of thinking it relies on who is/is not our President. Participate in American democracy or continue to be the reason it is no longer.

Sensitive content

Idc if you like Donald J. Trump or not the man is a father, a husband, a human being. He’s never harmed you. If you’re one of the people who think what happened yesterday is okay or “he deserved it” you’re a sick person, and need help. How about you stop being a vile human being and start doing what you can to make this a better country instead of thinking it relies on who is/is not our President. Participate in American democracy or continue to be the reason it is no longer.

ricky larkin

34,582 次观看 • 2 年前

A man who went to prison for talking people out of their money filmed himself doing it live, then sold the method as a course. 7 million people have watched him work. The man is Jordan Belfort. The film about him made him famous. What almost nobody has done is watch the real one, on camera, running the actual technique on a real prospect for 22 minutes with no script and no edit. And the way he does it is the reason to watch. He barely talks about the product. The first minutes are almost entirely questions, and every answer gets used against the person later in his own words. He is not persuading. He is collecting. Then the phrase the comments turned into a meme. He ends his key sentences with four words that make agreement feel like the neutral option and refusal feel like rudeness. Once you notice it, you cannot unhear it, and you will catch it in the next call you take. One viewer broke the whole method into 9 steps in a comment. It got 12 thousand likes, which tells you people are studying this video like a manual. Here is the uncomfortable part. Every technique in it is ordinary sales advice: listen, mirror, remove friction, set expectations. That is exactly what makes it worth studying. The tools were never the crime. The intent was. Learn what is being done to you and it stops working on you. That is the only defense there is. 22 minutes. No script. It is in the video.

A man who went to prison for talking people out of their money filmed himself doing it live, then sold the method as a course. 7 million people have watched him work. The man is Jordan Belfort. The film about him made him famous. What almost nobody has done is watch the real one, on camera, running the actual technique on a real prospect for 22 minutes with no script and no edit. And the way he does it is the reason to watch. He barely talks about the product. The first minutes are almost entirely questions, and every answer gets used against the person later in his own words. He is not persuading. He is collecting. Then the phrase the comments turned into a meme. He ends his key sentences with four words that make agreement feel like the neutral option and refusal feel like rudeness. Once you notice it, you cannot unhear it, and you will catch it in the next call you take. One viewer broke the whole method into 9 steps in a comment. It got 12 thousand likes, which tells you people are studying this video like a manual. Here is the uncomfortable part. Every technique in it is ordinary sales advice: listen, mirror, remove friction, set expectations. That is exactly what makes it worth studying. The tools were never the crime. The intent was. Learn what is being done to you and it stops working on you. That is the only defense there is. 22 minutes. No script. It is in the video.

Silverhand

1,511,465 次观看 • 1 个月前

You can struggle for years in trading and still have nothing to show for it… Then comes a month that completely changes the story. That’s the part of trading people rarely talk about the lifestyle, the opportunities, and what can happen when years of learning, losses, and experience finally come together. One successful month can make you look back and realize why you had to go through all those years of suffering. But there’s a reason that one successful month is possible… I explained it in this video Watch this video till the end and make sure you share it!

You can struggle for years in trading and still have nothing to show for it… Then comes a month that completely changes the story. That’s the part of trading people rarely talk about the lifestyle, the opportunities, and what can happen when years of learning, losses, and experience finally come together. One successful month can make you look back and realize why you had to go through all those years of suffering. But there’s a reason that one successful month is possible… I explained it in this video Watch this video till the end and make sure you share it!

InveStorTolu💥

50,608 次观看 • 26 天前

This is for the people who don’t listen! The craziest thing about Drake isn’t that he can rap, sing, write, or make hits. It’s that he turns the difficult into easy listening, and makes complexity sound effortless. This is why most people often miss how intricately he weaves words, until they hear someone else decipher it! Iceman - "MAKE THEM CRY" 👂🏽

This is for the people who don’t listen! The craziest thing about Drake isn’t that he can rap, sing, write, or make hits. It’s that he turns the difficult into easy listening, and makes complexity sound effortless. This is why most people often miss how intricately he weaves words, until they hear someone else decipher it! Iceman - "MAKE THEM CRY" 👂🏽

industrypolitics

38,866 次观看 • 3 个月前

Kim namgil talking about canvas of blood and Bogum : in Korea, when people talk about historical figures, those who are evil or who seize power are usually portrayed as sharp looking, while the people trying to protect something are often cast with actors who have gentle, deer like eyes so in canvas of blood, even though it wasn’t intentional, i naturally gave off more of the image of someone trying to take something away, while Bogum played the prince trying to protect it, even just standing side by side, anyone can immediately tell the difference between the one trying to take and the one trying to protect, but on set, it was actually a little unclear between us, It became fun because you actually wonder who’s the one taking and who’s the one protecting, I think that’ll make the movie more enjoyable to watch Bogum always has this bright energy about him, which is really nice and because of that, there’s this anticipation about what kind of charm he’d show if he played someone more evil or morally neutral, so when people see this side of him this time, I think they’ll be really surprised HELLO? drop the movie already I really can’t wait 😭😭😭 #CanvasOfBlood

Kim namgil talking about canvas of blood and Bogum : in Korea, when people talk about historical figures, those who are evil or who seize power are usually portrayed as sharp looking, while the people trying to protect something are often cast with actors who have gentle, deer like eyes so in canvas of blood, even though it wasn’t intentional, i naturally gave off more of the image of someone trying to take something away, while Bogum played the prince trying to protect it, even just standing side by side, anyone can immediately tell the difference between the one trying to take and the one trying to protect, but on set, it was actually a little unclear between us, It became fun because you actually wonder who’s the one taking and who’s the one protecting, I think that’ll make the movie more enjoyable to watch Bogum always has this bright energy about him, which is really nice and because of that, there’s this anticipation about what kind of charm he’d show if he played someone more evil or morally neutral, so when people see this side of him this time, I think they’ll be really surprised HELLO? drop the movie already I really can’t wait 😭😭😭 #CanvasOfBlood

gummy 🇵🇸

15,652 次观看 • 3 个月前

This painting shows a man suffering in silence for the sake of people who, in the end, would crucify him... It is called Christ in the Wilderness, painted by Ivan Kramskoi in 1872. It shows the forty days in the desert, but Kramskoi leaves out everything we expect: there is no devil, no dramatic temptation, no glow of holiness. There is only a man on a stone with his hands clenched together, having plainly sat there all night. Look at the feet. They are bare on the sharp rocks, and they are bleeding. He has walked a long way in the dark and has not slept, worn down by a decision only he can make... Kramskoi was clear about what he had painted. For him, he wrote, this was the image of a man with the highest sense of duty, caught in the moment he must choose. Tolstoy, who understood a great deal about the weight of a conscience, told the gallery's owner it was the best Christ he knew. Everyone comes, sooner or later, to some version of that stone: a morning when the right thing and the easy thing point in opposite directions, and no one else can make the choice for you. The painter never tells us what Christ decides. Instead, he paints the weight of the choice before it is made. For the measure of a person is not what they do when the world is watching, but what they resolve to do in the grey hour, alone, when walking away would cost them nothing at all...

This painting shows a man suffering in silence for the sake of people who, in the end, would crucify him... It is called Christ in the Wilderness, painted by Ivan Kramskoi in 1872. It shows the forty days in the desert, but Kramskoi leaves out everything we expect: there is no devil, no dramatic temptation, no glow of holiness. There is only a man on a stone with his hands clenched together, having plainly sat there all night. Look at the feet. They are bare on the sharp rocks, and they are bleeding. He has walked a long way in the dark and has not slept, worn down by a decision only he can make... Kramskoi was clear about what he had painted. For him, he wrote, this was the image of a man with the highest sense of duty, caught in the moment he must choose. Tolstoy, who understood a great deal about the weight of a conscience, told the gallery's owner it was the best Christ he knew. Everyone comes, sooner or later, to some version of that stone: a morning when the right thing and the easy thing point in opposite directions, and no one else can make the choice for you. The painter never tells us what Christ decides. Instead, he paints the weight of the choice before it is made. For the measure of a person is not what they do when the world is watching, but what they resolve to do in the grey hour, alone, when walking away would cost them nothing at all...

James Lucas

53,577 次观看 • 1 个月前