The Cornell case raises an uncomfortable question: If someone can be too intoxicated to consent, shouldn't that standard apply equally to men? I'm not declaring what happened here—that's for the legal system. But consent can't mean one thing for women and another for men.

Where did Jane Doe stick objects into these men's bodies and cause ohysical harm? I missed that part.

The men tagging themselves in after one of the other guys sent out a "Free Pussy" text aren't victims you fucking rape enabler. (BTW that guy that appointed himself consenter on her behalf -there's no such thing- that's coordinating a gang rape.) Do you fkn hear you? Out here going for gold in mental gymnastics to justify gang rape.

@BreitbartNews Without referencing this particular event, a woman cannot be inside a man, body to body to “take” from him.

Did she consent to an add for free pussy? That’s trafficking. Why defend a pos

It actually does apply...no where in the law does it specify men over women. The peoblem is men who are incapacitated generally wouldnt be able to get it up...dont act like yall dont get to messed up and go limp.....

@BreitbartNews Wrong, in the world of wokeness it’s good to discriminate against Men, particularly if they are White.

Oh my God, y’all are fucking exhausting. Shut the fuck up you rapist, loving douche bag keep slobbering the knob of those rapist and hey ladies this guy right here cover your drink when you’re around him because he probably assaulted some women too

Totally agree!!

@BreitbartNews One of the men had stated that he was too intoxicated to consent and she was all over him. It should be applied equally

She consented to the drug use and the sexual acts. She then gets dumped by one of the guys and she gets mad.

You really cannot be this stupid the non consensual part is penetration!

Not really...drunk women and men can both consent. When you become too incapacitated or unconscious, consent stops. The real question here is why Cornell police omitted and softened language in their report from the 2 day interview with the alleged victim that they gave to the DA

@BreitbartNews Of course it should apply to men. If a man is so intoxicated that he cannot defend himself, he should not be forced into sex that is unwanted.

Re-read what you posted here - have you ever had a wife or Girlfriend? This case will expedite the male college Exodus - major colleges are already 60/40 and NIL has created a new class of male millionaires being paid to play sports and fake being a student - the remainder of men at major colleges will be the low IQ inner city types getting grants and scholarships or worse. Women are breaking things they touch

Yes, if someone pushes an object into your ass during you are too drunk.

As in a DUI ticket ?

@BreitbartNews And why just sex? Contracts? Wedding vows? Non refundable purchases?

Logic and reasoning isn’t in play here. It’s all about emotion and politiking for the November elections.

#alcoholawareness Just another example of the most harmful and destructive drug on the planet, #alcohol

She could consent but was denied the right to make an informed consent. The boys communicated to 57 other boys, organised and coordinated to sexually assault her - marketing her as free pussy. She was not made aware of this so could not have made an informed consent.

What about dui vehicular homicide?

@grok are based on the laws in the US is the definition of rape significantly different for male v female victims?

She clearly enticed the drunken men.

Funny cause freedom of choice over one's body seems to mean different things to men versus women. Or so say the pro-life fucktards anyway.

That’s the dirty little secret in the law isn’t it? The law does not treat men equally despite being obligated to and feminists want to make sure it stays that way.

Men/women process alcohol differently. But both can be too drunk to consent to sex but be responsible for acts like driving or rape. But she couldn’t consent to sex if she’s barely conscious w/ a BAL at .3. Horrifying that no one in that frat house looked out for her .

It does under the "women are fair flowers who must be protected" doctrine. Which feminists hated. Call me perplexed.

Sure it can, when there is a pattern of getting high and participating in gang rapes of drugged women, which it clearly seems that can be established based on the leaked Snapchat history.

Since it only applies to women. Maybe make it illegal for a woman to engage in sex if she have been drinking. They can call it an SUI.

"Consent can't mean one thing for women and another for men." Feminists: Oh yeah? Watch us.