Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

The DA is selling the Good Hope Centre plus 50 properties, aggregating 282,000 hectares. This is mass-scale privatization of state resources!! If the DA gets power, it will sell off all state resources to wealthy businessmen & create an irreversible oligarchy, as it is in the USA, where people... show more

Rahul SA 🇿🇦

6,988 subscribers

63,490 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Comedy Kunst Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

If you take the wealth of all the rich people in the world and give it to the poor, in two years the rich will get their money back, and many of the poor will return to poverty. Wealth is a system, and poverty is a mindset. Here’s how to break out of that mindset.

If you take the wealth of all the rich people in the world and give it to the poor, in two years the rich will get their money back, and many of the poor will return to poverty. Wealth is a system, and poverty is a mindset. Here’s how to break out of that mindset.

Wilberforce Theophilus

13,540 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Countries are not rich in proportion to their natural resources. If they were, Russia would now be the richest country in the world. Angola would be very rich, and there are many other countries which have a lot of natural resources but they have not had an enterprise economy to develop those resources. Russia has everything: oil, gas, diamonds, platinum, gold, silver, timber, marvellous soil, but has been poor. She's also got very bad environment. [...] It is the countries with the wrong system which have not created the wealth or cared about people. Look at the other side: Japan—no natural resources. Switzerland—no natural resources. Taiwan—no natural resources. Hong Kong—no natural resources.

Countries are not rich in proportion to their natural resources. If they were, Russia would now be the richest country in the world. Angola would be very rich, and there are many other countries which have a lot of natural resources but they have not had an enterprise economy to develop those resources. Russia has everything: oil, gas, diamonds, platinum, gold, silver, timber, marvellous soil, but has been poor. She's also got very bad environment. [...] It is the countries with the wrong system which have not created the wealth or cared about people. Look at the other side: Japan—no natural resources. Switzerland—no natural resources. Taiwan—no natural resources. Hong Kong—no natural resources.

Margaret Thatcher

30,325 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk laughs at and dismisses local residents in Brandenburg, Germany after they voiced concerns that his Tesla Gigafactory is stealing their water. Groundwater levels in the region have been dropping for the past three decades and the region is now experiencing droughts. This is the inherent flaw with capitalism. It is based on the ridiculous notion that you can have infinite growth on a planet with finite resources. In biology, such behavior of cells is called "cancer” and it ultimately kills the patient. The same thing is going to happen to humanity unless we stop the reckless greed of the billionaire class. Natural resources belong to our communities, not corporations, yet under capitalism the private sector is allowed to loot, plunder, and hoard resources in order to maximize profits for rich shareholders. It is time for the people to put an end to this barbaric capitalist system that will allow humanity to go extinct if it means generating more profit for the rich. It is time for the people to build a better world where workers own the means of production and resources are used for the benefit of our communities.

Elon Musk laughs at and dismisses local residents in Brandenburg, Germany after they voiced concerns that his Tesla Gigafactory is stealing their water. Groundwater levels in the region have been dropping for the past three decades and the region is now experiencing droughts. This is the inherent flaw with capitalism. It is based on the ridiculous notion that you can have infinite growth on a planet with finite resources. In biology, such behavior of cells is called "cancer” and it ultimately kills the patient. The same thing is going to happen to humanity unless we stop the reckless greed of the billionaire class. Natural resources belong to our communities, not corporations, yet under capitalism the private sector is allowed to loot, plunder, and hoard resources in order to maximize profits for rich shareholders. It is time for the people to put an end to this barbaric capitalist system that will allow humanity to go extinct if it means generating more profit for the rich. It is time for the people to build a better world where workers own the means of production and resources are used for the benefit of our communities.

Power to the People ☭🕊

95,768 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

Is America an oligarchy? Even a system that calls itself a democracy can become an oligarchy if power becomes concentrated in the hands of a few very wealthy people and corporations.

Is America an oligarchy? Even a system that calls itself a democracy can become an oligarchy if power becomes concentrated in the hands of a few very wealthy people and corporations.

Robert Reich

71,080 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#WATCH | Delhi: Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi says, "First of all, this is the victory of our students. This is the future of India. The education system which used to be our pride, the whole world acknowledged that the education system of India is very good. It has been under attack for years. It is being captured, it is being privatized. This was a reaction to that. Pradhan is a symbol. A symbol of corruption, a symbol of destruction of the education system, a symbol of incompetence. He had to go. And it is good that he went. But now the government will have to take concrete steps to change the education system. The RSS's capture of the education system of India is a big issue. If it is Modi ji's fault, then the RSS is equally at fault."

#WATCH | Delhi: Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi says, "First of all, this is the victory of our students. This is the future of India. The education system which used to be our pride, the whole world acknowledged that the education system of India is very good. It has been under attack for years. It is being captured, it is being privatized. This was a reaction to that. Pradhan is a symbol. A symbol of corruption, a symbol of destruction of the education system, a symbol of incompetence. He had to go. And it is good that he went. But now the government will have to take concrete steps to change the education system. The RSS's capture of the education system of India is a big issue. If it is Modi ji's fault, then the RSS is equally at fault."

ANI

80,419 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Psychologists define power as “control over access to resources.” A person has power if they can determine whether you get a paycheck, or whether you can move into a certain neighborhood, or a join a certain organization. It is about access to material resources rather than about esteem or regard that lives in the minds of people. Power is evolutionarily novel. In small-scale hunter-gatherer societies, no single human gets to control access to resources. But in the modern era, humans now have the ability to stockpile resources, command large militaries, win the favor of large numbers of allies, and use organized force. Power necessarily entails violence or the threat of violence. If someone tried to control access to critical resources without the backing of violence, others would simply take what they have. The communist dictator Mao Zedong famously said that “Power grows from the barrel of a gun.” Olympic athletes have high status; they are prestigious and generally well-regarded. But they don’t control access to resources. They don’t have power. Nightclub bouncers and doormen don't necessarily have high-status, but they do have power; they control access to who goes in and out of nightclubs.

Psychologists define power as “control over access to resources.” A person has power if they can determine whether you get a paycheck, or whether you can move into a certain neighborhood, or a join a certain organization. It is about access to material resources rather than about esteem or regard that lives in the minds of people. Power is evolutionarily novel. In small-scale hunter-gatherer societies, no single human gets to control access to resources. But in the modern era, humans now have the ability to stockpile resources, command large militaries, win the favor of large numbers of allies, and use organized force. Power necessarily entails violence or the threat of violence. If someone tried to control access to critical resources without the backing of violence, others would simply take what they have. The communist dictator Mao Zedong famously said that “Power grows from the barrel of a gun.” Olympic athletes have high status; they are prestigious and generally well-regarded. But they don’t control access to resources. They don’t have power. Nightclub bouncers and doormen don't necessarily have high-status, but they do have power; they control access to who goes in and out of nightclubs.

Rob Henderson

18,284 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

In the NREGA Act, the reason that it worked is because the Centre would give the full funding if the state implemented it, and if the state failed to implement it, then they would have to carry the cost of the unemployment allowance. Now they will have to carry the cost of implementation at a higher rate...In the end, there is no guarantee from the Centre; it is only putting legal obligations on the states. — Reetika Khera (Professor of Economics, IIT Delhi) #NewsToday Rajdeep Sardesai

In the NREGA Act, the reason that it worked is because the Centre would give the full funding if the state implemented it, and if the state failed to implement it, then they would have to carry the cost of the unemployment allowance. Now they will have to carry the cost of implementation at a higher rate...In the end, there is no guarantee from the Centre; it is only putting legal obligations on the states. — Reetika Khera (Professor of Economics, IIT Delhi) #NewsToday Rajdeep Sardesai

IndiaToday

46,535 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The truth about digital ID is that it is already here. The Brit Card is a distraction, a clever psyop to make people think they have stopped something, while the real system quietly embeds itself behind the scenes. When the time comes, will people stand up or bow down to the evil controllers? Because this is what it comes down to in the end. The system of total control is being built in plain sight, and many will take the mark willingly, believing it is for their safety or convenience. We all have to say no. No matter what the cost.

The truth about digital ID is that it is already here. The Brit Card is a distraction, a clever psyop to make people think they have stopped something, while the real system quietly embeds itself behind the scenes. When the time comes, will people stand up or bow down to the evil controllers? Because this is what it comes down to in the end. The system of total control is being built in plain sight, and many will take the mark willingly, believing it is for their safety or convenience. We all have to say no. No matter what the cost.

Doc Malik

72,310 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

I was asked by USA Today to respond to remarks made by Hasan Piker about Zionism. Piker claimed as follows: “Zionism is the ethnoreligious supremacist ideology that is exterminationist in principle, born out of the wrong assessment that this was a land without people for a people without land. It required the extermination of the indigenous population, and that's precisely what has happened since its inception. And its final iteration of that has been the Gaza genocide that we watched unfold.” You can call a blowtorch an avocado as many times as you want, but it still doesn’t have a seed, and it still isn’t green because it’s still just a blowtorch. The claim that Zionism is an exterminationist ideology is just as nonsensical as calling a blowtorch an avocado. The suggestion that Jews want to exterminate the Arabs who also live on the land is likewise, as it has always been, ludicrous and false. Zionism is a simple idea, which is that Jews have the same rights — not more rights, but also not fewer rights — than every other people on Earth have to sovereignty in their national homeland. So just as you might think that Bulgarians have the right to sovereignty in their homeland, Japanese people, Korean people, German people all have the right to sovereignty in their homeland, Zionism is just the idea that Jews should be treated the same. By the way, this is in the charter, the charter that is the foundation of the state of Israel. In that document, the word ‘extermination,’ of course, would never appear there, but anything that even remotely resembles that word or idea is foreign to any of the early laws or that document. In fact, the document says precisely the opposite. The document says that one of the purposes of the state of Israel is to allow Jews and Arabs alike to live in peace and to flourish together in the land of Israel. That's what the Declaration of Independence of the State of Israel says, and by the way, that's what the state of Israel has proven, more so than what it said in 1948, in the decades since.

I was asked by USA Today to respond to remarks made by Hasan Piker about Zionism. Piker claimed as follows: “Zionism is the ethnoreligious supremacist ideology that is exterminationist in principle, born out of the wrong assessment that this was a land without people for a people without land. It required the extermination of the indigenous population, and that's precisely what has happened since its inception. And its final iteration of that has been the Gaza genocide that we watched unfold.” You can call a blowtorch an avocado as many times as you want, but it still doesn’t have a seed, and it still isn’t green because it’s still just a blowtorch. The claim that Zionism is an exterminationist ideology is just as nonsensical as calling a blowtorch an avocado. The suggestion that Jews want to exterminate the Arabs who also live on the land is likewise, as it has always been, ludicrous and false. Zionism is a simple idea, which is that Jews have the same rights — not more rights, but also not fewer rights — than every other people on Earth have to sovereignty in their national homeland. So just as you might think that Bulgarians have the right to sovereignty in their homeland, Japanese people, Korean people, German people all have the right to sovereignty in their homeland, Zionism is just the idea that Jews should be treated the same. By the way, this is in the charter, the charter that is the foundation of the state of Israel. In that document, the word ‘extermination,’ of course, would never appear there, but anything that even remotely resembles that word or idea is foreign to any of the early laws or that document. In fact, the document says precisely the opposite. The document says that one of the purposes of the state of Israel is to allow Jews and Arabs alike to live in peace and to flourish together in the land of Israel. That's what the Declaration of Independence of the State of Israel says, and by the way, that's what the state of Israel has proven, more so than what it said in 1948, in the decades since.

Roy K. Altman

20,582 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Here’s Sizwe Mpofu and Lukhona Mnguni engaging in shebeen politics. Mnguni is furious at how “people are taking from a hospital in Tembisa” and making the rest of us “feel inadequate”. The shebeen part is where he insists that these people “must be dealt with by the arm of the law a brutal and bruising knockout punch”. Like taxi rank politics, this rhetoric is emotionally satisfying but ultimately goes nowhere. The problem is this mentality assumes that the problem is some “criminal” element, instead of a system that rewards that very behaviour. But more to the point, Mnguni demands that the same arm of the same system must deal itself a “knockout punch”. Shisanyama politics at its finest. The “arm of the law” is literally part of the same body doing the looting. How exactly are people still missing the fact that it’s all one system serving the same interests? That the state serves as a vehicle of accumulation regardless of who’s in power? Every institution is there for accumultion. Law enforcement included. Expecting the law to deliver a “knockout punch” to its own patronage networks is asking a hand to cut itself off. By framing the issue as “cruel criminals,” commentators like Mnguni individualise a structural problem. Their logic suggests that if we simply replace “bad” people with “virtuous” ones, the machinery will suddenly function for the poor. The reality is that in a system built on capital accumulation, the extraction of resources is the goal. Whether that extraction happens via a legal corporate contract or an illegal tender is just a matter of who wrote the rules. Of course, the issue is that poor people suffer the most from resource looting, in the same way poor people suffer the most from colds and flu. But the solution is not to get rid of the “flu virus”. You cannot “arrest” a virus. The best way to deal with it is to fight to get the most affected people into the same position as the least affected group. To do this, you have to accept that true justice is not a jail cell for a tenderpreneur, but the elevation of the Tembisa patient to a position where their life is not dependent on the whims of a state machinery designed for accumultion. The reason people commonly miss the fact that it’s all one system is because the alternative is terrifying. Admitting the system is designed this way implies that reform is impossible and only a radical transformation works. So, it’s much easier for media personalities like Lukhona Mnguni to call for better policing than to question the foundational interests of state-led accumulation. The “cruel criminals” framing is politically convenient because it preserves faith in institutions, avoids confronting how the state structurally functions as an accumulation vehicle, allows for moral grandstanding without demanding actual transformation and makes the problem seem solvable through existing mechanisms. In case it’s still not clear, you can’t arrest your way out of systemic extraction any more than you can arrest a virus. The conditions that produce the illness of inequality and state-dependent survival remain unchanged regardless of how many individuals you jail. Elections won’t fix it. They just rotate who gets access. “Good governance” won’t fix it either. The governance is working as designed, just not for the poor.

Here’s Sizwe Mpofu and Lukhona Mnguni engaging in shebeen politics. Mnguni is furious at how “people are taking from a hospital in Tembisa” and making the rest of us “feel inadequate”. The shebeen part is where he insists that these people “must be dealt with by the arm of the law a brutal and bruising knockout punch”. Like taxi rank politics, this rhetoric is emotionally satisfying but ultimately goes nowhere. The problem is this mentality assumes that the problem is some “criminal” element, instead of a system that rewards that very behaviour. But more to the point, Mnguni demands that the same arm of the same system must deal itself a “knockout punch”. Shisanyama politics at its finest. The “arm of the law” is literally part of the same body doing the looting. How exactly are people still missing the fact that it’s all one system serving the same interests? That the state serves as a vehicle of accumulation regardless of who’s in power? Every institution is there for accumultion. Law enforcement included. Expecting the law to deliver a “knockout punch” to its own patronage networks is asking a hand to cut itself off. By framing the issue as “cruel criminals,” commentators like Mnguni individualise a structural problem. Their logic suggests that if we simply replace “bad” people with “virtuous” ones, the machinery will suddenly function for the poor. The reality is that in a system built on capital accumulation, the extraction of resources is the goal. Whether that extraction happens via a legal corporate contract or an illegal tender is just a matter of who wrote the rules. Of course, the issue is that poor people suffer the most from resource looting, in the same way poor people suffer the most from colds and flu. But the solution is not to get rid of the “flu virus”. You cannot “arrest” a virus. The best way to deal with it is to fight to get the most affected people into the same position as the least affected group. To do this, you have to accept that true justice is not a jail cell for a tenderpreneur, but the elevation of the Tembisa patient to a position where their life is not dependent on the whims of a state machinery designed for accumultion. The reason people commonly miss the fact that it’s all one system is because the alternative is terrifying. Admitting the system is designed this way implies that reform is impossible and only a radical transformation works. So, it’s much easier for media personalities like Lukhona Mnguni to call for better policing than to question the foundational interests of state-led accumulation. The “cruel criminals” framing is politically convenient because it preserves faith in institutions, avoids confronting how the state structurally functions as an accumulation vehicle, allows for moral grandstanding without demanding actual transformation and makes the problem seem solvable through existing mechanisms. In case it’s still not clear, you can’t arrest your way out of systemic extraction any more than you can arrest a virus. The conditions that produce the illness of inequality and state-dependent survival remain unchanged regardless of how many individuals you jail. Elections won’t fix it. They just rotate who gets access. “Good governance” won’t fix it either. The governance is working as designed, just not for the poor.

Sizwe SikaMusi

56,304 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This isn't quite right. The reason women are so susceptible to Marxist propaganda is because it is women's nature as a political philosophy. Women redistribute. Women take care of the weak. It doesn't work as a primary political system because you cannot take care of the weak if you don't have a masculine system on top to create the productivity necessary to do it. If the men aren't hunting there isn't meat that can be redistributed to the weak that can't hunt. The men have to have a reason to create the abundance necessary to redistribute. This is why you can have an immensely prosperous society that is capitalist first with the feminine organizing principle below it and it's why the opposite is not true.

This isn't quite right. The reason women are so susceptible to Marxist propaganda is because it is women's nature as a political philosophy. Women redistribute. Women take care of the weak. It doesn't work as a primary political system because you cannot take care of the weak if you don't have a masculine system on top to create the productivity necessary to do it. If the men aren't hunting there isn't meat that can be redistributed to the weak that can't hunt. The men have to have a reason to create the abundance necessary to redistribute. This is why you can have an immensely prosperous society that is capitalist first with the feminine organizing principle below it and it's why the opposite is not true.

The Last Boy Scout

46,595 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

POWER TO THE PEOPLE We can get peace now if we want it now. Anybody knows that the people have the power. All we have to do is awaken the power in the people. #powertothepeople

POWER TO THE PEOPLE We can get peace now if we want it now. Anybody knows that the people have the power. All we have to do is awaken the power in the people. #powertothepeople

John Lennon

22,302 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The only project I have to deliver to the people of Delta state is how to deliver mr President in 2027. It is what I have that I can give and this is what I have. This is coming from an Elected Governor😭

The only project I have to deliver to the people of Delta state is how to deliver mr President in 2027. It is what I have that I can give and this is what I have. This is coming from an Elected Governor😭

EJIKEME🇳🇴🇳🇬

22,656 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

When your task is to build the #Reds, you have to be able to do it without a full compliment of resources. The State of the Franchise, on @700WLW and iHeartRadio.

When your task is to build the #Reds, you have to be able to do it without a full compliment of resources. The State of the Franchise, on @700WLW and iHeartRadio.

Austin Elmore

35,985 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr