正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The deadly avalanche in Nepal was initially reported as a glacier collapse. Clearer satellite imagery now shows it was the mountain itself that broke off. Geomorphologist Kristen Cook says "the rock that the glacier was sitting on collapsed," carrying ice and boulders into the valley and triggering the destructive...

96,416 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

31 条评论

peasant trader 的头像
peasant trader1 个月前

You hear that? It’s the sound of a million X posts being deleted by the climate doomers that the flood happened bc we eat steak once a week.

IgnisNuntius 的头像
IgnisNuntius1 个月前

Science must look for direct physical reasons for a specific collapse but educated people understand that all mountains erode and collapse in the long run. Tectonically active uplifting ranges like the Himalayas and Andes experience more catastrophic events than ancient ones.

Tommy Lambert 的头像
Tommy Lambert1 个月前

In other words, climate change had zero to do with it.

Bryan Biggs 的头像
Bryan Biggs1 个月前

Sat imagery most certainly does not show that. Two things are clear. X and google are working to draw people to the collapsed bedrock theory, and AWAY from noticing straight lines. I notice the UNNATURAL straight line.

GreenGenieWales 🇬🇧🌍🌡️ 的头像
GreenGenieWales 🇬🇧🌍🌡️1 个月前

Celebrating "bedrock failure" like it’s a win for denialists, completely oblivious to the fact that high-alpine geomorphologists track these exact rock-ice avalanches as textbook indicators of CLIMATE destabilisation. Rock collapsed because thermal change of the glacier on top!

KahuMark 的头像
KahuMark1 个月前

And CLIMATE ALARMIST say; "Ooooops"

London Hebrew 的头像
London Hebrew1 个月前

Clever place to locate a settlement really.

Neill  Payne 的头像
Neill Payne1 个月前

Climate alarmism is an unfalsifiable religious non-theory. A scientific theory has to have some condition or circumstance that would prove it is false. For these cultists, every event proves climate change. There is nothing that would disprove it.

Arjun 的头像
Arjun1 个月前

Bedrock failure doesn't disprove climate change it's actually a sign of it. High altitude rock walls are bound together by permafrost. When temperatures rise that frozen glue thaws and melting glaciers remove physical support from the cliffside causing the rock itself to give way

Sharon Collins 的头像
Sharon Collins1 个月前

Hydroelectric dams cause flash flooding by diverting natural water courses. Xizang the highest altitude dam constructed 2025 with rapid expansion. Mudslides and landslides triggered by heavy Monsoon Rains.

Garrosh Hellscream 的头像
Garrosh Hellscream1 个月前

Your forgot one major fact... That China caused this disaster by boreing tunnels and blowing shit up.. that's why a large pop was heard before the glacier broke off..

Carlos Santos 的头像
Carlos Santos1 个月前

Check for detonation, and sharp, sudden seismic activity.

Ian McGhee BSc Hons 的头像
Ian McGhee BSc Hons1 个月前

Yep the extra weight of the Glacier broke the rock.

Say So 的头像
Say So1 个月前

It's because there was TOO MUCH ICE ON TOP.

SublimeFusion 的头像
SublimeFusion1 个月前

Can't ignore this part:

TianaTa 的头像
TianaTa1 个月前

Not a glacier collapse, the mountain bedrock failed first

A Soldier of FREEDOM 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 的头像
A Soldier of FREEDOM 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿1 个月前

@andyburnham Why are you doubling down on your climate lunacy again?

Womack 的头像
Womack1 个月前

Climate change freaks are in shambles.

keyboard warrior 的头像
keyboard warrior1 个月前

All those people in the video are dead. Buried under the mountain of mud. Sad.

The Omegaman 🇺🇸 的头像
The Omegaman 🇺🇸1 个月前

As the communists say Never let a good disaster go to waste

Chris White. 的头像
Chris White.1 个月前

That is misleading garbage from electroverse

Glenn Davis 的头像
Glenn Davis1 个月前

This exact thing happened in a (fortunately) sparsely populated area of Alaska. In the 60s or so, I think. A huge rockfall triggered an immense tsunami in the river valley below. Can’t remember exactly, but I think hundreds of feet of water were measured by the debris field.

Nic Uloth 的头像
Nic Uloth1 个月前

We will see more of these disasters as climate change melts mountain sides. Thats why American denial of climate change because of greed is so callous

Cancel some of the Government 的头像
Cancel some of the Government1 个月前

What held that rock in place?

Deep Anjum 的头像
Deep Anjum1 个月前

Nepal demands compensation

MachLab 的头像
MachLab1 个月前

山体本身是冻土,是由水冰和砂石混合在一起的物质,其中的水冰以胶体冰和层状冰形式存在,像胶水一样抓着砂石彼此,气温的升高会让其中的水冰融化,砂石间的握力越来越小。十年前的地震有可能让这里有些许松动,但这里的冰层逐年融化可能才是重要触发原因。

Jim D 的头像
Jim D1 个月前

Only the flooding part comes from the glacier. Got it.

Ricky 的头像
Ricky1 个月前

The death toll from devastating floods in Nepal has risen to 1,050, while around 4,000 people remain missing and a large-scale rescue operation involving teams from Nepal, China and India is continuing.

eggandbaconburgerstand 的头像
eggandbaconburgerstand1 个月前

Started posting last year, very close to what has been suggested by other posts in last week since satellite imagery became available. Missing retreat of glacial ice that used to block overhang from dropping. Always like the way these accounts take you to the edge without explaining why the edge.

Velvex Vancreed 的头像
Velvex Vancreed1 个月前

cuz they built a hydro plant on/next to the glacier

Hannu Luukkonen 的头像
Hannu Luukkonen1 个月前

Entä maanjäristys,miksi se salataan,muka ilmaston lämpeneminen aiheutti,glopojen valetta?

相关视频

What happened above❓ 🛘A Chinese photographer captured the mountain collapse that set off the Nepal–Tibet disaster.🇳🇵 👇New information The exact volume is still being calculated from satellite data. The strongest working estimate puts the combined rock, ice and debris at roughly 50–100 million m³. If most of that material were rock and soil at about 2.5–2.7 tonnes per m³: • 50 million m³ → about 125–135 million tonnes • 100 million m³ → about 250–270 million tonnes So a rock–ice–debris mass on the order of 125–270 million tonnes may have moved. If much of it was ice, the tonnage would be lower. What the USGS says This was not a tectonic magnitude 5.2 earthquake. A huge mass movement — rock and glacier collapse, then a debris flow — produced a seismic signal equivalent to M5.2. That signal was the collapse. The likely chain: rock/ice collapse → debris flow → temporary river blockage → sudden release → flood and debris surge The key correction from Adrien Gilbert (CNRS) The first movement may not have been the glacier snapping off on its own. Gilbert argues it began as a massive rock slide of several million m³ that dragged glacial ice with it. “The glacier collapsed” is therefore incomplete. The glacier was sitting on a mountainside that failed. The most striking figures so far • Mobilized volume: preliminary 50–100 million m³ • Mass equivalent: ~125–270 million tonnes if the density is mostly rock • Vertical drop: about 1.2–1.3 km • Seismic equivalent: M5.2 (not a fault-rupture quake) • Flow speed: about 50 m/s (~180 km/h) — Chinese geologist Guo Zhaocheng • Debris-flow length: more than 20 km • Downstream impact: up to about 100 km • Extra water reported at Devghat: an early technical estimate of ~20 million m³ (needs a cited source) This is not over Two landslide-dammed lakes have formed. The lake on the Chinese side is reported at about 2 million m³, with roughly 3 million m³ more water expected to enter the system in the coming days. Another surge remains possible. #Himalayas #Nepal #Tibet #FlashFlood #Earthquake #NaturalDisaster #flood #自然災害 #ネパール #बाढ़ #भूकंप #尼泊尔 #西

Jeo Albant

12,674 次观看 • 1 个月前