正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The debate about #IstanbulConvention is not just about combating violence against women (all sane people oppose violence against women), but redefining what a woman is. According to this Convention, "gender" is not related to a biological sex anymore, but "the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities and attributes that a...

49,060 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Lars Stenfeldt Hansen 的头像
Lars Stenfeldt Hansen3 年前

Christian Terhes nails it again! We need more of your type of politicians to go directly into these WOKE absurdities, it´s have gone too far...

MokumMama 的头像
MokumMama3 年前

Thank you Sir! 🎯

Daughters of Persia 的头像
Daughters of Persia1 年前

Today, we remember Reyhaneh Jabbari, a 26-year-old Iranian woman EXECUTED for defending herself against RAPE. Imagine facing death simply for saying "No"! Western women, stand with us in amplifying Reyhaneh’s voice and all women in Iran who risk everything for their dignity and rights. #ReyhanehJabbari #WomanLifeFreedom

George Sasu 的头像
George Sasu3 年前

Bravo to a sane and courageous EU parliamentarian!

WORIADS Europe 的头像
WORIADS Europe3 年前

Thank you for standing up for women on this issue. This shouldn't be a question of partisan politics but of simple common sense. It's unfortunate that many of your colleagues have lost sight of that or lack the courage to speak out because they fear being labelled "right wing"

veronika.nika 的头像
veronika.nika3 年前

Your are the best Romanian politian!! Thank you for fighting for people.

Jan 的头像
Jan3 年前

There are ONLY TWO GENDERS.

N.A.K 🇫🇮🇳🇱🇧🇪🇲🇫🇭🇺🇵🇱 的头像
N.A.K 🇫🇮🇳🇱🇧🇪🇲🇫🇭🇺🇵🇱3 年前

On behalf of my young daughter and all girls and women, thank you 🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

Donald 的头像
Donald3 年前

🤣🤣😅😅😂😄😜

Cristian Dragoi 的头像
Cristian Dragoi3 年前

🎯💯

相关视频

“I can define a woman… I just take an inclusive approach.” This means she includes men in her definition of women. Ffs. There is a lot to unpack in this snide & immature clip. First of all, Amanda Camm MP is correct: you cannot protect women if you can’t define them. Otherwise, who are you protecting? How are you catering to specific needs? How are you helping a woman whose protection involves single-sex care? Words only purpose is that they have objective meaning. Next, an inclusive approach to the definition of women is… only including women. That’s what inclusivity actually is. Allowing men to be classed as women simply turns the category of woman into a mixed sexed category. It dismantles the category. It’s not inclusive, it’s destructive. Then, she calls defining a woman as importing Trumpian-style politics to Australia. This is laughably stupid. Trump didn’t decide what a woman is, he acknowledged that accurately defining women in law & society was a no brainer political win & ceased upon the opportunity. If you do want to talk about importing American ideologies, that conversation will be about gender ideology. You don’t have an issue with importing problems, only the solution. Not wanting to stop with the stupidity, she then says that it’s all a distraction from the actual issue: men’s violence against women. Who and what are you talking about? If those words aren’t defined, the statement makes no sense. I’ll prove it: in the event there is male violence against men who claim to be women, that is going to be for a very different reason than men’s violence against women, requiring different plans & solutions. See, even to defend your stupid ideology it’s important to have correct definitions so everyone gets the correct help. Finally, she mocks being told it’s tokenistic to wear purple to support the “queer community”. It’s so pathetic, I’m not even going to bother commenting on it. When she was the Minister for Women, Shannon Fentiman blocked me because I said that a woman is an adult human female. She ignored pleas from me and many Queensland-based women to meet with her to discuss our opposition to self ID laws. She says she is not ashamed of her stance but she should be. She is ignoring women in favor of men, proving in actions instead of words that she knows *exactly* what a woman is.

Sall Grover

40,674 次观看 • 11 个月前

This video of a young male student beating up a female student because she said she does not want to be in a relationship with him is wrong on so many levels. I will start with the simplest issue. The person recording and just watching is as culpable as the idiot committing the violence. He should have intervened and stopped this coward from assaulting an innocent girl. The boy carrying out the violence is wicked and dangerous. This is the kind of behaviour that grows into a violent man, a violent partner, someone who cannot take no for an answer. That mindset is already visible here. Women and girls have agency and the absolute right to reject a proposal. When a woman says she does not want you, you respect that decision. You do not intimidate her. You do not force yourself on her. What we are seeing here is also a reflection of upbringing and socialisation. This kind of violence is learned. A boy who thinks this is acceptable behaviour has likely seen it normalised at home or in his community, perhaps watching a father abuse a mother and believing that it is acceptable. I never saw my father lift a hand or even raise his voice against my mother. That is why this is so disturbing. The Zimbabwean police must identify this young man and deal with him decisively. If such behaviour is ignored, these are the same young men who later become murderers because violence has been normalised in their minds. Beating a woman because she said no is not strength. It is weakness of character, weakness of mind, and moral failure. I also want to commend this young girl. She showed courage in the face of brutality. If anyone knows her, please identify her. I want to do something for her. She deserves recognition for standing up to a cowardly bully. And to the Zimbabwe Republic Police Zimbabwe Republic Police, this is what we have been saying for years, to you and to the political elites who routinely use violence against citizens. Violence has been normalised in our society. Children have grown up watching the police use force against civilians. They have seen soldiers brutalise and kill citizens, and they have learned from it. They now believe that violence is acceptable and that every dispute must be settled through force. This is not happening in a vacuum. This culture of violence has been taught, demonstrated, and tolerated from the top. What we are witnessing in our streets and schools is a mirror of what the state has normalised. This, too, is on your doorstep.

Hopewell Chin’ono

134,111 次观看 • 7 个月前

For the past few years, everyone has been asking one question - what is a woman? It's an important question. But it's not THE most important question. Instead, we should be asking: What is Gender? What is the purpose of gender? Besides its manipulative purpose, the Queer+ trans cult's idealistic reinterpretation of gender has nothing to do with man or woman. They are exploiting the fact that the labels of man and woman are social constructs and using the sex based norms, roles, and stereotypes that have formed as a result of societal conditioning for a specific transhumanist purpose. Gender cultists have used this fact in order to alchemically create an entirely different definition of gender and are using it to convince humanity that we have a gender identity that could possibly not align with our material body, and that it is possible that we can have elective surgical augmentation procedures to align our physical form with our gender (which is just a reinterpretation and inversion of the concept of the soul). What if I told you that the purpose of gender was to trick humanity into adopting the spiritual beliefs of a select few elite sociopathic billionaires? While at the same time creating a multibillion - if not multiTRILLION - dollar-a-year industry designed to specifically target children and use their sliced up bodies to affirm their apocalyptic cosmological view of reality. I am not the first person to tackle this topic. Others in the "gender space" have addressed this issue in various ways, and this is just another attempt to draw attention to what I believe is THE most tyrannical political and religious movement that has ever existed. The below video lays it out in the best, most concise possible way I could muster given the evidence that can be found on the hellscape that is the internet. I hope you enjoy it.

Patrick, Retard🎄

23,396 次观看 • 1 年前