Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

The double-slit experiment is a key demonstration in quantum physics that reveals the strange behavior of particles like electrons and photons. In the experiment, particles are fired at a barrier with two slits, and a screen records where they land. If both slits are open and no measurement is... made, the particles form an interference pattern, like waves overlapping, even when sent one at a time. This suggests that each particle passes through both slits at once in a state called superposition. However, if detectors are placed at the slits to observe which path the particle takes, the interference pattern disappears. The particles then behave like classical objects, going through one slit or the other. This change in behavior simply from observing the system is known as the observer effect, and it highlights a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics: measurement affects the outcome. The experiment challenges our understanding of reality, showing that at the quantum level, particles don't have definite states until they are observed 🤓show more

𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝚆𝙷𝙸𝚃𝙴 𝚁𝙰𝙱𝙱𝙸𝚃

112,840 subscribers

51,041 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Thomas Young's double-slit experiment, performed in 1801, is one of the most important demonstrations in physics. It provided strong evidence that light behaves as a wave by producing interference patterns. In the experiment, coherent light is directed at an opaque barrier with two closely spaced slits. The light waves passing through these slits interfere with one another, creating a pattern of bright and dark fringes on a screen positioned behind the slits. The spacing and location of these fringes depend on the light's wavelength, the distance between the two slits, and the distance to the screen. This experiment established the wave nature of light. The modern understanding of wave-particle duality, where light can also behave like particles (photons), developed in the early 20th century with quantum mechanics, and is beautifully illustrated by modern versions of the double-slit experiment performed with individual photons.

Thomas Young's double-slit experiment, performed in 1801, is one of the most important demonstrations in physics. It provided strong evidence that light behaves as a wave by producing interference patterns. In the experiment, coherent light is directed at an opaque barrier with two closely spaced slits. The light waves passing through these slits interfere with one another, creating a pattern of bright and dark fringes on a screen positioned behind the slits. The spacing and location of these fringes depend on the light's wavelength, the distance between the two slits, and the distance to the screen. This experiment established the wave nature of light. The modern understanding of wave-particle duality, where light can also behave like particles (photons), developed in the early 20th century with quantum mechanics, and is beautifully illustrated by modern versions of the double-slit experiment performed with individual photons.

The Math Flow

13,424 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Simulation Theory: The Double Slit Experiment proves particles act like waves until observed then they snap into particles. What if our reality only "Renders" when we're looking, just like a video game optimizing resources? This could be the key to unlocking the true nature of reality.

Simulation Theory: The Double Slit Experiment proves particles act like waves until observed then they snap into particles. What if our reality only "Renders" when we're looking, just like a video game optimizing resources? This could be the key to unlocking the true nature of reality.

Interstellar

59,078 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

Thomas young's double slit experiment proved light behaves like a wave by creating an interference pattern that only waves can produce. He shown light through two narrow slits cut into a barrier and recorded the pattern on a screen behind it.

Thomas young's double slit experiment proved light behaves like a wave by creating an interference pattern that only waves can produce. He shown light through two narrow slits cut into a barrier and recorded the pattern on a screen behind it.

Science Simplified

17,783 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

THE DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT Reality changes based on whether or not it's being viewed The double slit experiment shows photons (particles of light) behave differently when observed by human consciousness. This suggests that the human mind can fundamentally alter matter.

THE DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT Reality changes based on whether or not it's being viewed The double slit experiment shows photons (particles of light) behave differently when observed by human consciousness. This suggests that the human mind can fundamentally alter matter.

Redpill Drifter

21,840 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

2. The Observer Effect is real. In quantum physics, particles change behavior when they are observed. Which means: Reality isn’t fixed. It responds to attention. Your focus doesn’t just interpret the world—it alters it.

2. The Observer Effect is real. In quantum physics, particles change behavior when they are observed. Which means: Reality isn’t fixed. It responds to attention. Your focus doesn’t just interpret the world—it alters it.

Darshak Rana ⚡️

80,514 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The observer effect in quantum physics is the phenomenon where the act of measurement or observation alters the state of a quantum system, causing it to behave differently than it would if unobserved. This interaction often collapses a particle's wave-like potentiality into a definite, measurable state, challenging classical notions of objective reality.

The observer effect in quantum physics is the phenomenon where the act of measurement or observation alters the state of a quantum system, causing it to behave differently than it would if unobserved. This interaction often collapses a particle's wave-like potentiality into a definite, measurable state, challenging classical notions of objective reality.

Philosophy Of Physics

70,902 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 Simulation Theory: The Double Slit Experiment proves particles act like waves until observed then they snap into particles. What if our reality only "renders" when we're looking, just like a video game optimizing resources? Check out this episode from The Why Files breaking it down, tying it to Simulation Theory. Are we in a sim? This could be the key to unlocking the true nature of existence! The Why Files video did a great job on explaining the Double Slit Experiment & Simulation Theory What do YOU think—real or rendered? Drop your thoughts below!

🚨 Simulation Theory: The Double Slit Experiment proves particles act like waves until observed then they snap into particles. What if our reality only "renders" when we're looking, just like a video game optimizing resources? Check out this episode from The Why Files breaking it down, tying it to Simulation Theory. Are we in a sim? This could be the key to unlocking the true nature of existence! The Why Files video did a great job on explaining the Double Slit Experiment & Simulation Theory What do YOU think—real or rendered? Drop your thoughts below!

Interstellar

48,422,634 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 Mind-blowing stuff: The Double Slit Experiment proves particles act like waves until observed—then they snap into particles. 🤯 What if our reality only "renders" when we're looking, just like a video game optimizing resources? Check out this episode from The Why Files breaking it down, tying it to Simulation Theory. Are we in a sim? This could be the key to unlocking the true nature of existence! The Why Files video did a great job on explaining the Double Slit Experiment & Simulation Theory What do YOU think—real or rendered? Drop your thoughts below!

🚨 Mind-blowing stuff: The Double Slit Experiment proves particles act like waves until observed—then they snap into particles. 🤯 What if our reality only "renders" when we're looking, just like a video game optimizing resources? Check out this episode from The Why Files breaking it down, tying it to Simulation Theory. Are we in a sim? This could be the key to unlocking the true nature of existence! The Why Files video did a great job on explaining the Double Slit Experiment & Simulation Theory What do YOU think—real or rendered? Drop your thoughts below!

Interstellar

120,272 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Quantum field theory predicts that light can scatter off light, an effect beyond classical electrodynamics. Maxwells equations are linear such that two photons never interact with each other However, in reality, if you cross two light beams photons will scatter if they're energetic enough. Even in vacuum, the photons interact with the ever-present quantum fields of charged particles, like electrons, even when no actual charged particles are present But you need very high energies to see this. Thankfully we built a machine specifically to probe nature at very high energies. At the LHC, this rare process of light-by-light scattering has been observed Hidden among millions of photons lighting up the detector, physicists were able to identify 26 distinct light-by-light scattering events This CMS graphic shows how they found them:

Quantum field theory predicts that light can scatter off light, an effect beyond classical electrodynamics. Maxwells equations are linear such that two photons never interact with each other However, in reality, if you cross two light beams photons will scatter if they're energetic enough. Even in vacuum, the photons interact with the ever-present quantum fields of charged particles, like electrons, even when no actual charged particles are present But you need very high energies to see this. Thankfully we built a machine specifically to probe nature at very high energies. At the LHC, this rare process of light-by-light scattering has been observed Hidden among millions of photons lighting up the detector, physicists were able to identify 26 distinct light-by-light scattering events This CMS graphic shows how they found them:

Martin Bauer

60,227 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In particle accelerators, beams of particles are focused and fired forward at almost the speed of light. But how are those particles controlled? @suziesheehy explains.

In particle accelerators, beams of particles are focused and fired forward at almost the speed of light. But how are those particles controlled? @suziesheehy explains.

Royal Institution (now on Bluesky)

35,838 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

🚨 The double slit experiment keeps resurfacing for a reason particles behave like waves until they’re observed, then suddenly “choose” a state. Reality doesn’t just exist… it responds. If observation changes outcome, then consciousness isn’t just a passive observer ,it’s part of the system itself. That’s where simulation theory starts creeping in: a universe that only fully “renders” when measured. The deeper question isn’t whether this proves we’re in a simulation… it’s why reality behaves like it’s waiting to be seen.

🚨 The double slit experiment keeps resurfacing for a reason particles behave like waves until they’re observed, then suddenly “choose” a state. Reality doesn’t just exist… it responds. If observation changes outcome, then consciousness isn’t just a passive observer ,it’s part of the system itself. That’s where simulation theory starts creeping in: a universe that only fully “renders” when measured. The deeper question isn’t whether this proves we’re in a simulation… it’s why reality behaves like it’s waiting to be seen.

T R U T H P O L E

12,865 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 The Double Slit Experiment PROVES we are living in a Simulation? “This experiment is absolutely wild and may confirm that we’re living in a simulation.” “The electrons change their state by going back in time... the scientific definition of that is called retro causality.” “It’s exactly like how rendering works in a video game... things only get rendered if you’re observing them.” “If a tree falls in the woods and no one’s there to observe it… does it even exist?” This just broke my brain. Is reality only loading when we look? Are we the players... or the NPCs? What’s YOUR wildest theory? Simulation, glitch, or something even crazier? Drop it below 👇

🚨 The Double Slit Experiment PROVES we are living in a Simulation? “This experiment is absolutely wild and may confirm that we’re living in a simulation.” “The electrons change their state by going back in time... the scientific definition of that is called retro causality.” “It’s exactly like how rendering works in a video game... things only get rendered if you’re observing them.” “If a tree falls in the woods and no one’s there to observe it… does it even exist?” This just broke my brain. Is reality only loading when we look? Are we the players... or the NPCs? What’s YOUR wildest theory? Simulation, glitch, or something even crazier? Drop it below 👇

Interstellar

85,308 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

“Senator RENNICK: In TGA FOI 3390-11 there were 67 particles greater than 10 microns in a particular batch. That's about 1000 times greater than what the FDA recommended. Do you know what those 67 particles were? Dr Kerr: I have a bit to say to that. We have actually responded to that question before in SQ-24000188. The particles question we've also answered before. The particles in that particular document are not DNA, and we've responded to that question before. The particles. Senator RENNICK: So what are they? That's my question. Dr Kerr: They're normally particles in injectables. There are limits on them. Companies are supposed to check for those in their batch release process. But, ultimately, those particles are not DNA. Senator RENNICK: I'm not saying they are. I'm just asking: what are they? Dr Kerr: It's not related to the 10 nanograms per dose. Senator RENNICK: But is it a contaminant? If it's not DNA and it is not mRNA or a lipid, what is it? Dr Kerr: It's acceptable for pharmaceutical preparations to have a small number of particles present. Senator RENNICK: But my question is: what is the particle? That's a big particle, 10 microns. I mean, the lipids were like - Dr Kerr: I think l'd have to go back and have a look at that FOl to make sure it actually was 10 microns. Senator RENNICK: I can give it to you, if you like. Dr Kerr: Perhaps we could go back and have a look at it and take that on notice. Senator RENNICK: Okay. l'd like to know exactly what it was, if that's okay.” ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• And the answer is: “The specification for the particulates test in the European Pharmacopoeia is: The preparation complies with the test if the average number of particles present in the units tested does not exceed 6000 per container equal to or greater than 10 um and does not exceed 600 per container equal to or greater than 25 um. Therefore, the results for particulates shown in FOl 3390-11 are well within the pharmacopoeial requirements. The particles are not DNA. DNA is highly soluble in aqueous solution, so any DNA present in the vaccines would not appear as micron scale particles. Batch release testing includes residual DNA quantitation on every batch, and this ensures DNA (above trace amounts) would be detected. mRNA vaccines may contain trace amounts of residual DNA at no more than 10 nanograms (ng) of DNA per dose ( The limit of 10 ng per dose prevents the formation of particles large enough to be detected in the micron scale. All injectable or infusion products, including vaccines, are permitted to contain subvisible particles if they comply with the US FDA and European Pharmacopeia 2.9.19 specification for particulate matter. These limits were established after a long history of use of injectables without adverse events occurring in the presence of particulates within this specification. There is no requirement to identify subvisible particles counted in injectable or infusion products, however these particles are likely to consist of extraneous undissolved particulates from the manufacturing process (e.g. trace amounts of dust or fibres) and not DNA.” •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• And there you have it. The TGA don’t know what are they putting into your bodies. 10 microns is a big particle when you’re talking in biochemistry terms. It’s a third of a dose size of the lipids. Rather than actually answer my question as to what the particles are they skirt the answer by claiming they fall within European guidelines. The same as when they use the WHO guidelines to ignore autopsy reports about reported deaths. Furthermore, what does 6,000 per container mean? How big is the container? How many batches does a container hold? And does this apply to DNA? What this answer tells us is the TGA don’t know what is in the Covid-19 batches and they have misled the Senate by providing a misleading answer. #auspol

“Senator RENNICK: In TGA FOI 3390-11 there were 67 particles greater than 10 microns in a particular batch. That's about 1000 times greater than what the FDA recommended. Do you know what those 67 particles were? Dr Kerr: I have a bit to say to that. We have actually responded to that question before in SQ-24000188. The particles question we've also answered before. The particles in that particular document are not DNA, and we've responded to that question before. The particles. Senator RENNICK: So what are they? That's my question. Dr Kerr: They're normally particles in injectables. There are limits on them. Companies are supposed to check for those in their batch release process. But, ultimately, those particles are not DNA. Senator RENNICK: I'm not saying they are. I'm just asking: what are they? Dr Kerr: It's not related to the 10 nanograms per dose. Senator RENNICK: But is it a contaminant? If it's not DNA and it is not mRNA or a lipid, what is it? Dr Kerr: It's acceptable for pharmaceutical preparations to have a small number of particles present. Senator RENNICK: But my question is: what is the particle? That's a big particle, 10 microns. I mean, the lipids were like - Dr Kerr: I think l'd have to go back and have a look at that FOl to make sure it actually was 10 microns. Senator RENNICK: I can give it to you, if you like. Dr Kerr: Perhaps we could go back and have a look at it and take that on notice. Senator RENNICK: Okay. l'd like to know exactly what it was, if that's okay.” ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• And the answer is: “The specification for the particulates test in the European Pharmacopoeia is: The preparation complies with the test if the average number of particles present in the units tested does not exceed 6000 per container equal to or greater than 10 um and does not exceed 600 per container equal to or greater than 25 um. Therefore, the results for particulates shown in FOl 3390-11 are well within the pharmacopoeial requirements. The particles are not DNA. DNA is highly soluble in aqueous solution, so any DNA present in the vaccines would not appear as micron scale particles. Batch release testing includes residual DNA quantitation on every batch, and this ensures DNA (above trace amounts) would be detected. mRNA vaccines may contain trace amounts of residual DNA at no more than 10 nanograms (ng) of DNA per dose ( The limit of 10 ng per dose prevents the formation of particles large enough to be detected in the micron scale. All injectable or infusion products, including vaccines, are permitted to contain subvisible particles if they comply with the US FDA and European Pharmacopeia 2.9.19 specification for particulate matter. These limits were established after a long history of use of injectables without adverse events occurring in the presence of particulates within this specification. There is no requirement to identify subvisible particles counted in injectable or infusion products, however these particles are likely to consist of extraneous undissolved particulates from the manufacturing process (e.g. trace amounts of dust or fibres) and not DNA.” •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• And there you have it. The TGA don’t know what are they putting into your bodies. 10 microns is a big particle when you’re talking in biochemistry terms. It’s a third of a dose size of the lipids. Rather than actually answer my question as to what the particles are they skirt the answer by claiming they fall within European guidelines. The same as when they use the WHO guidelines to ignore autopsy reports about reported deaths. Furthermore, what does 6,000 per container mean? How big is the container? How many batches does a container hold? And does this apply to DNA? What this answer tells us is the TGA don’t know what is in the Covid-19 batches and they have misled the Senate by providing a misleading answer. #auspol

Senator Gerard Rennick

66,062 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

QUANTUM COMPUTERS DON’T THINK FASTER - THEY THINK EVERYTHING AT ONCE A classical computer tests each possibility one at a time. A quantum computer? It runs every possibility simultaneously. With 20 qubits, it can process a million outcomes at once. With 300 qubits, it could match the number of particles in the observable universe. Now that’s next-level computing. Source: Everysci24

QUANTUM COMPUTERS DON’T THINK FASTER - THEY THINK EVERYTHING AT ONCE A classical computer tests each possibility one at a time. A quantum computer? It runs every possibility simultaneously. With 20 qubits, it can process a million outcomes at once. With 300 qubits, it could match the number of particles in the observable universe. Now that’s next-level computing. Source: Everysci24

Mario Nawfal

154,890 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘁𝘂𝗯𝘂𝗹𝗲𝘀: 𝗔 𝗚𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗽𝘀𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗕𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆? Researchers may have just found quantum superpowers in microtubules. Yes, you read that right—quantum *superradiance* in the brain! Superradiance is a phenomenon where excited particles behave like a team, emitting photons collectively in a bright, ultra-fast burst. This is different from normal fluorescence, where photons are emitted slowly and individually. Imagine a synchronized light show on a quantum scale. The key ingredient? Quantum entanglement. If particles are spaced closer than the wavelength of incoming light, they form a collective quantum state. This allows them to act as one entity, amplifying energy release, just like a laser—but smaller in scale. The study zeroed in on tryptophan molecules inside microtubules. When hit with UV light, they emitted much more energy than regular fluorescence could explain—100 times more, to be exact. The researchers believe this can only happen through superradiance, implying large-scale quantum entanglement. If true, this discovery could be huge. It may hint that quantum effects play a bigger role in biology—and even in brain function—than we ever imagined. Could Penrose and the quantum brain theory be right after all? This clip is from "𝗪𝗮𝘀 𝗣𝗲𝗻𝗿𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁? 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗜𝗻 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻" (PBS Space Time, YouTube, Jul 25, 2024)

𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘁𝘂𝗯𝘂𝗹𝗲𝘀: 𝗔 𝗚𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗽𝘀𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗕𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝘆? Researchers may have just found quantum superpowers in microtubules. Yes, you read that right—quantum superradiance in the brain! Superradiance is a phenomenon where excited particles behave like a team, emitting photons collectively in a bright, ultra-fast burst. This is different from normal fluorescence, where photons are emitted slowly and individually. Imagine a synchronized light show on a quantum scale. The key ingredient? Quantum entanglement. If particles are spaced closer than the wavelength of incoming light, they form a collective quantum state. This allows them to act as one entity, amplifying energy release, just like a laser—but smaller in scale. The study zeroed in on tryptophan molecules inside microtubules. When hit with UV light, they emitted much more energy than regular fluorescence could explain—100 times more, to be exact. The researchers believe this can only happen through superradiance, implying large-scale quantum entanglement. If true, this discovery could be huge. It may hint that quantum effects play a bigger role in biology—and even in brain function—than we ever imagined. Could Penrose and the quantum brain theory be right after all? This clip is from "𝗪𝗮𝘀 𝗣𝗲𝗻𝗿𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁? 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗗𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗤𝘂𝗮𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀 𝗜𝗻 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻" (PBS Space Time, YouTube, Jul 25, 2024)

Ultra Skool 🧠

18,781 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 BREAKING: Quantum reality doesn’t choose a state. It holds all of them at once. This is called a Bloch Sphere and every possible state of a quantum system lives on its surface. Spin up. Spin down. Or anything in between. That “in between” is the wild part. It means quantum systems don’t just exist in one state… they exist as superpositions of possibilities. So instead of flipping between 0 and 1… They exist as both. At the same time. That means reality, at its core, isn’t definite it’s probabilistic. This is what quantum computing is built on. Not faster bits… but entirely different rules. Follow me this is where physics stops being intuitive.

🚨 BREAKING: Quantum reality doesn’t choose a state. It holds all of them at once. This is called a Bloch Sphere and every possible state of a quantum system lives on its surface. Spin up. Spin down. Or anything in between. That “in between” is the wild part. It means quantum systems don’t just exist in one state… they exist as superpositions of possibilities. So instead of flipping between 0 and 1… They exist as both. At the same time. That means reality, at its core, isn’t definite it’s probabilistic. This is what quantum computing is built on. Not faster bits… but entirely different rules. Follow me this is where physics stops being intuitive.

TheNewPhysics

160,250 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

MICROSOFT BUILT THE COLDEST PLACE IN THE UNIVERSE TO UNLEASH A QUANTUM MONSTER Colder than interstellar space - 40x colder, actually - and no, it’s not a freezer. It’s a launchpad for Microsoft’s 1 million-qubit quantum chip, powered by a particle that wasn’t even proven to exist until now. While everyone else is bragging about 1,000-qubit machines the size of a warehouse, Microsoft just said: “Cool story. We put a supercomputer in our hand.” Their latest chip uses Majorana particles to do the impossible: cram football-field-level quantum power into something palm-sized. Normal computers crawl through problems one bit at a time. Quantum? It takes every path at once. And this thing? It’s got millions of paths. The quantum arms race just got very real. Source: Rillo TV

MICROSOFT BUILT THE COLDEST PLACE IN THE UNIVERSE TO UNLEASH A QUANTUM MONSTER Colder than interstellar space - 40x colder, actually - and no, it’s not a freezer. It’s a launchpad for Microsoft’s 1 million-qubit quantum chip, powered by a particle that wasn’t even proven to exist until now. While everyone else is bragging about 1,000-qubit machines the size of a warehouse, Microsoft just said: “Cool story. We put a supercomputer in our hand.” Their latest chip uses Majorana particles to do the impossible: cram football-field-level quantum power into something palm-sized. Normal computers crawl through problems one bit at a time. Quantum? It takes every path at once. And this thing? It’s got millions of paths. The quantum arms race just got very real. Source: Rillo TV

Mario Nawfal

480,908 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Has anyone noticed the millions of particles floating around? Here is what the sky looks like at up to x125 optical zoom. What are all those particles? Is it Spring in the air? Or pollution?

Has anyone noticed the millions of particles floating around? Here is what the sky looks like at up to x125 optical zoom. What are all those particles? Is it Spring in the air? Or pollution?

Anti Lockdown Alliance(GLOBAL)

100,988 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

We definitely live in a simulation. PROOF the we only see code not solid objects with our eyes. The phrase "everything is energy and nothing is solid" reflects modern physics, especially quantum mechanics, showing that matter isn't solid but vibrating energy fields; atoms are mostly empty space with particles as energy waves, not tiny balls, creating the illusion of solidity through electromagnetic interactions that our brains interpret, revealing reality as a dance of frequencies and potentials, not fixed objects.

We definitely live in a simulation. PROOF the we only see code not solid objects with our eyes. The phrase "everything is energy and nothing is solid" reflects modern physics, especially quantum mechanics, showing that matter isn't solid but vibrating energy fields; atoms are mostly empty space with particles as energy waves, not tiny balls, creating the illusion of solidity through electromagnetic interactions that our brains interpret, revealing reality as a dance of frequencies and potentials, not fixed objects.

Diana ❤️🇺🇸🙏🐸

353,041 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Few realize how close we are to a complete Physics revolution. Particle physics is about to be replaced by quantum-wave theory. There is no inconsistency between quantum and macro. Mass is energy. Standing waves produce coherence. The double slit experiment is the gateway to our new understanding. Think about what the answer must be. The electron is traversing all possible paths. How? Space is not empty. All points in space and time are connected. We can travel faster than the speed of light.

Few realize how close we are to a complete Physics revolution. Particle physics is about to be replaced by quantum-wave theory. There is no inconsistency between quantum and macro. Mass is energy. Standing waves produce coherence. The double slit experiment is the gateway to our new understanding. Think about what the answer must be. The electron is traversing all possible paths. How? Space is not empty. All points in space and time are connected. We can travel faster than the speed of light.

Ashton Forbes

132,641 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr