Simulation Theory: The Double Slit Experiment proves particles act like waves until observed then they snap into particles. What if our reality only "Renders" when we're looking, just like a video game optimizing resources? This could be the key to unlocking the true nature of reality.

Detection requires interaction with what the are detecting and that is what causes the different output, not the act of observation.

Source

Quantum Physics in a nutshell

The double slit experiment does not prove the observer changes it. They called the camera the observer but it's an interference device that collapses the wave. It's not a person causing the collapse of the wave.

Consciousness is fundamental to the existence of the universe. Pretty much proof of God.

My opinion: the double-slit experiment, called "The Thomas Young Experiment" shows particle interference. The structure having slits caused obstruction to the particles, where only some of the particles were able to pass through, however, they were still obstructed (interference) to a certain degree, causing the "wave" to occur. Detectors, measuring the particles did not "change" the behavior of the particles through "observation," but rather, the "detectors" had to have measured the particles as they existed under normal conditions, without interference. The Thomas Young experiment, supposedly, proved that energy is both particle and wave, which I believe was a misinterpretation; there is no wave occurring, naturally, in particulate matter, unless brought about by an interfering mechanism.

I’m not saying we live in a simulation, but experiments like this definitely make you think.

Çift yarık deneyi başlı başına gizemli ama simülasyon teorisini kanıtladığını söylemek için henüz erken gibi geliyor bana. Yine de oldukça düşündürücü.

@RyGuy75765 I’ve been wondering what happens if the observer is mistaken in what he thinks he sees? 🤔

“Love this clip, but the ‘observed’ part gets misunderstood a lot. It’s not your naked eye or consciousness doing it — it’s the measuring device itself that interacts with the particle and adds interference. That interaction is what kills the wave pattern, not some cosmic eyeball. Still mind-blowing though! The Why Files always delivers 🔥”

It can be simulation theory….but it can also be scientific proof of Gods existence. Won’t argue this as I’m not a scientist, but someone should look through that lens

Sit still. Close eyes and shut off mind. You’ll slowly realise that you’re the observer. The supreme consciousness. Get that?

How do they know there’s no extra electro interference by the camera apparatus that observes the electrons? I know you said it was unplugged but what is the apparatus made of how do we know that just having the apparatus they are unplugged doesn’t cause something?

I call this "The Lazy Universe Theory."

Now if you really want to blow your mind, isn’t the screen recording the pattern a form of observation!?

This is why our simulation has a hard cap on travel speed. Things in the universe that are light years away don’t need to render because we’ll never get there. It’s out of bounds

The universe does not function as an algorithm, nor can it be reduced to computation without committing a profound category error. The non-computability of reality is clearer than water; what we call “computation” is merely a projection, not the thing itself.

“What if our reality only "Renders" when we're looking, just like a video game optimizing resources?” That’s an unfalsifiable proposition. Therefore, I don’t think it’s likely to be anywhere near true.

Not a serious observation or conclusion.

I had this idea when I was 12, then I learned that you can't "observe" photons

"The Double Slit Experiment proves particles act like waves until observed then they snap into particles." It does nothing of the sort.

🤔

I wish I understood this clip

@CariOnAway It still begs the question of the observer. In games the creator is real and defines the parameters. An infinite creator cannot be fully known by the finite inside what was created. The difference is that our creator stepped into His creation with us and gave us a manual.

Congrats:

I love that the why files use the same video explaining the dbl slit experiment that I watched when I first found out about it years ago in order to understand it. Lmao it’s like baby Einstein, very easy to understand

Tom Campbell has been saying this for many years

This is the worst form of newspaper science. Nobody would even be thinking about simulations or we're in simulation if it weren't for the fact that we have video gaming simulations. The same phenomenon appears in almost every generation

As above so below

I actually suspected that during the COVID lockdowns that this might have been an artificially induced reduction in rendering requirements in order for whatever is running the simulation an opportunity to upgrade the upper level rendering system.

The assumption is that we are the observer.

It’s not just the double-slit experiment that tells us we’re in a simulation - professional James Gates has actually found computer code inside the equations that describe our lowest levels of reality

Aren’t you quantum entangling with the electrons

This is retardio