Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The Dreadnought Class submarines are the largest, most complex and capable submarines ever built in the UK. ⚓ They will start to replace the current Vanguard Class from the early 2030s and keep the UK safe with our continuous at sea nuclear deterrent – 365 days a year.

257,620 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von xxxxxxx xxxxxxx
xxxxxxx xxxxxxxvor 1 Jahr

We need our deterrent now more than ever, if anything we should build more of them.

Profilbild von Maroonmafia67@Dougiemcfc🇺🇦🇬🇧
Maroonmafia67@Dougiemcfc🇺🇦🇬🇧vor 1 Jahr

We could do with getting rid. I'm sure producing a missile with warhead is cheaper and non reliant on other nations.

Profilbild von 🇵🇱Ralfie Czech🇵🇱
🇵🇱Ralfie Czech🇵🇱vor 1 Jahr

You forgot to mention how much iron takes to built one and its carbon footprint.

Profilbild von Rarely Tolerable.
Rarely Tolerable.vor 1 Jahr

Zelensky says he needs nuclear weapons or Nato membership to keep Russia from attacking the west. Would you support giving nuclear weapons back to Ukraine?

Profilbild von K1W1 fella
K1W1 fellavor 1 Jahr

Royal navy have always had the best names. Dreadnought, vanguard, Ajax , victory, repulse....

Profilbild von Wolfy9435
Wolfy9435vor 1 Jahr

🤔 We also need to have a fully independent nuclear missile by the time they come into operation

Profilbild von Crusoe
Crusoevor 1 Jahr

@LordWalney And as an aside: Train and give a trade to 00's of school leavers (and others), valuable transferable skills used not just building subs.

Profilbild von Priesy
Priesyvor 1 Jahr

Meanwhile down in Dover 🙄

Profilbild von Gareth Hynes
Gareth Hynesvor 1 Jahr

Goodness this was surprisingly dull. Who cares how many cables it has or whether it has a gym. We want to know about its offensive and defensive capabilities. It weapons, its stealth tech, all that

Profilbild von Amnesic 🕊️
Amnesic 🕊️vor 1 Jahr

Can the Vanguard class last 10 more years?

Profilbild von Steve Bishop
Steve Bishopvor 1 Jahr

And should only be used to defend the UK not the EU

Ähnliche Videos

Why I say Japanese submarines are so dangerous and quieter than many nuclear submarines Conventional diesel-electric submarines are normally quieter than nuclear ones only at very low speeds, typically up to around 2-7 knots. Above that speed they quickly become noisy, while modern nuclear submarines can maintain excellent stealth up to about 20 knots. The British Astute-class, the Virginia Class and probably the French Suffren-class are said to remain among the quietest submarines in the world even at speeds close to 22-25 knots, behind only of the super quieter SeaWolf. So what does this have to do with Japanese submarines? The latest Japanese Subs represent such a leap in technology that they can stay extremely quiet up to 15 knots or more, a figure that gets remarkably close to modern nuclear submarines and is clearly superior to older nuclear classes. On top of that, these Japanese submarines are equipped with AIP and advanced lithium-ion batteries in the Taigei-class, allowing them to remain submerged for 15–20 days at low speed. When solid-state batteries enter service in the next generation, that endurance will practically double and this is scheduled to happen before 2030. Imagine how many daily patrols an adversary would need to track something that can disappear for weeks and need only few hours to recharge on surface. In regional scenarios (Indo-Pacific, East China Sea, Taiwan Strait), the Japanese strategy is perfectly suited, and maintenance costs are far lower than those of nuclear submarines. It is no coincidence that Israel has become a customer and ordered several of these boats. Submarines are a state of art for Japanese.

Patricia Marins

1,449,473 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

JUST IN: 🇬🇧🇷🇺 Russian Think Tank RISS Warns Putin, Britain Is Far More Powerful Than Moscow Thinks Britain may be smaller than Russia, but underestimating the UK would be a serious strategic mistake. 🇬🇧 4 Vanguard class nuclear submarines form the backbone of Britain’s deterrent, armed with Trident II D5 SLBMs. Each has 16 missile tubes, while Britain’s nuclear stockpile is estimated at around 225 warheads. The biggest advantage is survivability. A British SSBN operating covertly at sea is extremely difficult to locate and destroy, giving London a credible second strike capability. And Britain is adding another layer: ✈️ 12 F-35A Lightning II stealth fighters are being acquired for NATO’s nuclear mission, with a long term ambition of 138 F-35s across the programme. Meanwhile, Britain is replacing the Vanguard fleet with 4 Dreadnought class SSBNs, ensuring its nuclear deterrent continues for decades. Beyond nuclear weapons, Britain fields F-35B, Typhoon, Astute class attack submarines, aircraft carriers, advanced destroyers and frigates, alongside world class intelligence and surveillance capabilities. 🇬🇧 Britain doesn't need Russia’s enormous arsenal. It needs enough survivable capability to guarantee one thing: A first strike against Britain could never prevent devastating retaliation. Russia may have far greater military mass, but Britain still packs a nuclear punch Moscow cannot afford to underestimate. 👀

War Radar

119,720 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen