Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

The Einstein Test for AGI. Vishal Misra: “You take an LLM and train it on pre-1916 physics and see if it can come up with the theory of relativity.” “If it does, then we have AGI.” “It’s a high bar, but we should have high bars.” “At the time... show more

a16z

1,036,266 subscribers

80,968 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Demis Hassabis proposed a benchmark for scientific AGI: the "Einstein test" Train a system with a knowledge cutoff at 1901, then test whether it can independently rediscover what Einstein did in 1905, including special relativity Once it can, we're on the verge of genuinely novel invention

Demis Hassabis proposed a benchmark for scientific AGI: the "Einstein test" Train a system with a knowledge cutoff at 1901, then test whether it can independently rediscover what Einstein did in 1905, including special relativity Once it can, we're on the verge of genuinely novel invention

Haider.

35,615 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind and Nobel laureate, says the AGI definition the industry uses is too low a bar. His Einstein test: train a system on a 1901 knowledge cutoff and ask it to invent special relativity. "The human brain is the only existence proof we have that general intelligence is even possible." "That's a pretty high bar, and it means that it's probably higher bar than just being able to do some useful economic work." "The type of test I would have is like an Einstein test of, you know, let's train one of these systems with a 1901 knowledge cutoff. Can it invent special relativity like Einstein did in 1905?" "What you'd actually want is something a future version of AlphaGo to be able to invent Go, right? Invent a game as deep and as complex and elegant and as beautiful as Go, not just come up with a strategy within the game." "I don't think today's systems are yet capable of doing that, but I think they will be able to in the future." - Demis Hassabis (Demis Hassabis), CEO of Google DeepMind, on The Next Big Thing.

Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind and Nobel laureate, says the AGI definition the industry uses is too low a bar. His Einstein test: train a system on a 1901 knowledge cutoff and ask it to invent special relativity. "The human brain is the only existence proof we have that general intelligence is even possible." "That's a pretty high bar, and it means that it's probably higher bar than just being able to do some useful economic work." "The type of test I would have is like an Einstein test of, you know, let's train one of these systems with a 1901 knowledge cutoff. Can it invent special relativity like Einstein did in 1905?" "What you'd actually want is something a future version of AlphaGo to be able to invent Go, right? Invent a game as deep and as complex and elegant and as beautiful as Go, not just come up with a strategy within the game." "I don't think today's systems are yet capable of doing that, but I think they will be able to in the future." - Demis Hassabis (Demis Hassabis), CEO of Google DeepMind, on The Next Big Thing.

Karl Mehta

73,148 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Trump, when asked if he still does not have a healthcare plan: "I have concepts of a plan. I'm not president right now, but if we come up with something, I would only change it if we come up with something...You'll be hearing about it in the not-so-distant future."

Trump, when asked if he still does not have a healthcare plan: "I have concepts of a plan. I'm not president right now, but if we come up with something, I would only change it if we come up with something...You'll be hearing about it in the not-so-distant future."

Republican Accountability

103,617 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

.Patrick Collison on how Stripe got its name: "We just couldn't come up with a good name... We were literally reduced to picking random words late at night." "One of the folks at Stripe had the bright idea of, 'Why don't we just assemble a big list of words and email all of the owners of the dot com domains?'" "And then we also continued our own creative process. We came up with memorable names like PayDemon... We thought it was super clever because we could have this awesome mascot." "The owner of generously responded to us and had an offer that was at least within our plausible budgetary range." "But we couldn't decide between PayDemon and Stripe. I swear I'm not making this up... If we could not settle on a name by December 20th, 2010, we would just default to Stripe. And we couldn't think of a more compelling name, and so Stripe it became." Patrick Collison w/ John Lilly at Stanford University (2015)

.Patrick Collison on how Stripe got its name: "We just couldn't come up with a good name... We were literally reduced to picking random words late at night." "One of the folks at Stripe had the bright idea of, 'Why don't we just assemble a big list of words and email all of the owners of the dot com domains?'" "And then we also continued our own creative process. We came up with memorable names like PayDemon... We thought it was super clever because we could have this awesome mascot." "The owner of generously responded to us and had an offer that was at least within our plausible budgetary range." "But we couldn't decide between PayDemon and Stripe. I swear I'm not making this up... If we could not settle on a name by December 20th, 2010, we would just default to Stripe. And we couldn't think of a more compelling name, and so Stripe it became." Patrick Collison w/ John Lilly at Stanford University (2015)

a16z

112,787 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Patients with low vitamin D were ending up on ventilators and dying. The ones with normal levels were mostly fine. The fix looked obvious: give everyone vitamin D. Dr. Roger Seheult did exactly that. It didn't work. "We just didn't see the real benefits that we thought we would see." But what if vitamin D was never doing the heavy lifting? What if the blood test was pointing at something else, something we have quietly engineered out of our lives? Something like... the sun. Vitamin D wasn't the cause. It was a marker for sunlight, and almost no one gets enough anymore.

Patients with low vitamin D were ending up on ventilators and dying. The ones with normal levels were mostly fine. The fix looked obvious: give everyone vitamin D. Dr. Roger Seheult did exactly that. It didn't work. "We just didn't see the real benefits that we thought we would see." But what if vitamin D was never doing the heavy lifting? What if the blood test was pointing at something else, something we have quietly engineered out of our lives? Something like... the sun. Vitamin D wasn't the cause. It was a marker for sunlight, and almost no one gets enough anymore.

Epoch Health

42,077 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The Non-Traversable Bridge Einstein Found Inside Gravity Einstein’s equations not only describe gravity as a force but as the shape of Spacetime as well. In 1935, Einstein and Rosen found that the Schwarzschild solution could be written in a way that reveals something astonishing: Two separate exterior regions of Spacetime joined by a bridge-like throat Rᵤᵥ = 0 This became known as the Einstein-Rosen Bridge. It is often called a Wormhole, but the classical Einstein-Rosen bridge is not a science-fiction tunnel. In the standard Schwarzschild geometry, it is non-traversable. The throat does not remain open long enough for ordinary travel from one region to the other. Its real power is mathematical. It shows that General Relativity is not merely about objects moving through space. The theory allows Spacetime to have global structure such as different regions, horizons, extensions, and hidden connections that are not visible from one local patch alone. The Einstein-Rosen bridge is one of the earliest glimpses of that deeper idea. Gravity is geometry. And sometimes, geometry has two worlds joined by a throat. #Astrophysics #GeneralRelativity #Einstein #BlackHole #Spacetime #Cosmology #Gravity #Wormhole #Mathematics #Physics

The Non-Traversable Bridge Einstein Found Inside Gravity Einstein’s equations not only describe gravity as a force but as the shape of Spacetime as well. In 1935, Einstein and Rosen found that the Schwarzschild solution could be written in a way that reveals something astonishing: Two separate exterior regions of Spacetime joined by a bridge-like throat Rᵤᵥ = 0 This became known as the Einstein-Rosen Bridge. It is often called a Wormhole, but the classical Einstein-Rosen bridge is not a science-fiction tunnel. In the standard Schwarzschild geometry, it is non-traversable. The throat does not remain open long enough for ordinary travel from one region to the other. Its real power is mathematical. It shows that General Relativity is not merely about objects moving through space. The theory allows Spacetime to have global structure such as different regions, horizons, extensions, and hidden connections that are not visible from one local patch alone. The Einstein-Rosen bridge is one of the earliest glimpses of that deeper idea. Gravity is geometry. And sometimes, geometry has two worlds joined by a throat. #Astrophysics #GeneralRelativity #Einstein #BlackHole #Spacetime #Cosmology #Gravity #Wormhole #Mathematics #Physics

Mathelirium

92,000 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This first episode# of Costco Clueless… The “abandoned” trolley! I had a conversation with the guy and told him that if I were shooting an episode of People Behaving Badly right now, he would be the star. It started out with an abandoned trolley at the refrigeration section. It was there for a bit then when I started to record but he showed up. Then the second time, watch and listen at the end. When he did it a third time I had the off camera chat with him. There was a customer who have me a thumbs up and a thank you.

This first episode# of Costco Clueless… The “abandoned” trolley! I had a conversation with the guy and told him that if I were shooting an episode of People Behaving Badly right now, he would be the star. It started out with an abandoned trolley at the refrigeration section. It was there for a bit then when I started to record but he showed up. Then the second time, watch and listen at the end. When he did it a third time I had the off camera chat with him. There was a customer who have me a thumbs up and a thank you.

Stanley Roberts 📺🎥

21,665 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Astranis CEO John Gedmark calls space elevators the ultimate civilizational flex: if aliens come and find us and we don't have our space elevator up and running yet, that's embarrassing "I like space elevators. This is the idea that originally came from Arthur C. Clarke, who also was the person who came up with the idea of geosynchronous orbit." "He came up with this idea of once you build out infrastructure in that orbit, you could build this thing called a space elevator. It sounds a little crazy. Hundreds of years away, could be thousands. It does not actually violate any laws of physics. It's arguably doable with technology we have today." "The best way to think of it is you have this orbiting platform in geo, and you have a very long cable that hangs down and comes down to the surface of the earth. You anchor it, and then you could have essentially elevator cars running up and down this cable." "It completely eliminates the need for rockets at all. The cost is just the cost of the electricity to run these cable cars." "It's actually an inevitable thing. It just may be on the multi-thousand-year timescale. But we gotta do it. A space elevator is the ultimate civilizational flex. Aliens come and find us, and we don't have our space elevator up and running yet? What are we doing? We can't allow that." Christian Keil Astranis Space Technologies

Astranis CEO John Gedmark calls space elevators the ultimate civilizational flex: if aliens come and find us and we don't have our space elevator up and running yet, that's embarrassing "I like space elevators. This is the idea that originally came from Arthur C. Clarke, who also was the person who came up with the idea of geosynchronous orbit." "He came up with this idea of once you build out infrastructure in that orbit, you could build this thing called a space elevator. It sounds a little crazy. Hundreds of years away, could be thousands. It does not actually violate any laws of physics. It's arguably doable with technology we have today." "The best way to think of it is you have this orbiting platform in geo, and you have a very long cable that hangs down and comes down to the surface of the earth. You anchor it, and then you could have essentially elevator cars running up and down this cable." "It completely eliminates the need for rockets at all. The cost is just the cost of the electricity to run these cable cars." "It's actually an inevitable thing. It just may be on the multi-thousand-year timescale. But we gotta do it. A space elevator is the ultimate civilizational flex. Aliens come and find us, and we don't have our space elevator up and running yet? What are we doing? We can't allow that." Christian Keil Astranis Space Technologies

MTS

28,910 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

.Naval: Every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species. One of the things that you really learn when you read David Deutsch’s theories and you authenticate them for yourself is you realize humans are universal explainers. That means everything that we know in the universe follows the laws of physics, and there’s no reason to believe otherwise. If you think otherwise, then please present your better theory that explains the world. If you can’t do that, then you have to go with the laws of physics. Well, the laws of physics are completely computable. They can fit inside a Turing machine or computer, and a computer can simulate the laws of physics with arbitrary accuracy, limited only by the specific power of that computer. If you increase the power of that computer, you can simulate them more accurately. So humans already simulate—in our minds we simulate—and through our computers we simulate the weather, we simulate quasars, we even simulate human systems. We simulate the economy. We simulate all kinds of things. So anything that can be understood, we can understand in our minds. This is something the AGI people get wrong when they talk about superintelligence. There is nothing out there that can understand something fundamentally that we can’t understand. It might be faster at it, it might have more compute, it might have more memory, but there’s no concept that it can understand that we can’t ourselves understand. So we are maximal universal explainers. That means every human is capable of unbounded creativity. Anyone could be the next Einstein or Fermi or Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos or Jonas Salk or whatever. So we can create anything. And if we can create anything, every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species.

.Naval: Every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species. One of the things that you really learn when you read David Deutsch’s theories and you authenticate them for yourself is you realize humans are universal explainers. That means everything that we know in the universe follows the laws of physics, and there’s no reason to believe otherwise. If you think otherwise, then please present your better theory that explains the world. If you can’t do that, then you have to go with the laws of physics. Well, the laws of physics are completely computable. They can fit inside a Turing machine or computer, and a computer can simulate the laws of physics with arbitrary accuracy, limited only by the specific power of that computer. If you increase the power of that computer, you can simulate them more accurately. So humans already simulate—in our minds we simulate—and through our computers we simulate the weather, we simulate quasars, we even simulate human systems. We simulate the economy. We simulate all kinds of things. So anything that can be understood, we can understand in our minds. This is something the AGI people get wrong when they talk about superintelligence. There is nothing out there that can understand something fundamentally that we can’t understand. It might be faster at it, it might have more compute, it might have more memory, but there’s no concept that it can understand that we can’t ourselves understand. So we are maximal universal explainers. That means every human is capable of unbounded creativity. Anyone could be the next Einstein or Fermi or Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos or Jonas Salk or whatever. So we can create anything. And if we can create anything, every human is a lottery ticket bet on the future of the species.

Arjun Khemani

33,110 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“I think we have not given the fans a lot to love. I think that’s part of it and I think we take a lot of responsibility on that and having lost the fans a little bit. I think had we given them a lot more to cheer for and be up for in the 4th quarter and be into it and given them more wins; I think we would have looked at it a little differently. I think we can take a lot of responsibility for that; but I mean the fans have been there. They were up tonight. They were huge, they were loud, they were positive. I just want to move forward and just wanna try to continue to give them things to be positive for and show up and be happy that they support us. I’m just happy they show up for us.” Cooper Flagg speaks on the Mavericks fan base and the support he felt tonight in the AAC.

“I think we have not given the fans a lot to love. I think that’s part of it and I think we take a lot of responsibility on that and having lost the fans a little bit. I think had we given them a lot more to cheer for and be up for in the 4th quarter and be into it and given them more wins; I think we would have looked at it a little differently. I think we can take a lot of responsibility for that; but I mean the fans have been there. They were up tonight. They were huge, they were loud, they were positive. I just want to move forward and just wanna try to continue to give them things to be positive for and show up and be happy that they support us. I’m just happy they show up for us.” Cooper Flagg speaks on the Mavericks fan base and the support he felt tonight in the AAC.

Abby Jones

244,669 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Kevin McKernan - "We have a person who had 4 Pfizer [mRNA] 'vaccines' and then a year after that came down with a colon cancer [so there] were 3 biopsies taken [and then we looked to see] if there's any Pfizer sequence in there...and there is, and shockingly there's a lot of it"

Kevin McKernan - "We have a person who had 4 Pfizer [mRNA] 'vaccines' and then a year after that came down with a colon cancer [so there] were 3 biopsies taken [and then we looked to see] if there's any Pfizer sequence in there...and there is, and shockingly there's a lot of it"

Humanspective

348,597 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ilia Topuria opens up about the bullying he faced growing up "We were bullied at the school. There was constant confrontation with the kids at the school, and you have to stand up for yourself a lot of the time. I was always a kid who didn’t like confrontation in the street, but sometimes you have to face those kind of situations, and I felt afraid. It awakens a sadness; you start to feel less, you don’t have that courage until you speak up." (Via Charlas Adictivas )

Ilia Topuria opens up about the bullying he faced growing up "We were bullied at the school. There was constant confrontation with the kids at the school, and you have to stand up for yourself a lot of the time. I was always a kid who didn’t like confrontation in the street, but sometimes you have to face those kind of situations, and I felt afraid. It awakens a sadness; you start to feel less, you don’t have that courage until you speak up." (Via Charlas Adictivas )

Red Corner MMA

12,011 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

NEW: Trump suggests the NFL should come up with a new name because there is "no question" that soccer is actually football. "Soccer in the United States, we seem to never call it that because we have a little bit of a conflict with another thing that's called football." "But when you think about it ... I mean, this is football, there's no question about it. We have to come up with another name for the NFL. It really doesn't make sense when you think about it."

NEW: Trump suggests the NFL should come up with a new name because there is "no question" that soccer is actually football. "Soccer in the United States, we seem to never call it that because we have a little bit of a conflict with another thing that's called football." "But when you think about it ... I mean, this is football, there's no question about it. We have to come up with another name for the NFL. It really doesn't make sense when you think about it."

Collin Rugg

874,086 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Germany's Defence Minister Boris Pistorius on the collapse of FCAS with France: That the end for FCAS came was no longer surprising. It had been pointing that way for quite some time. It came down above all to tensions — let me put it that way — between the two major industries. With the knowledge of today, we would not set up this project the way it was set up back then. That is a lesson we must draw from this. It was an ambitious, large European project that has now shattered against reality. We have to live with that. There is absolutely no reason to assume that the German-French relationship is strained because of this. This changes nothing about the relationship with France. There are a multitude of smaller and larger projects on our agenda. As for the new jet — we will see which paths we take. We have already been in talks with various actors for months. You can imagine that I will not publicly speculate here about which project it could be.

Germany's Defence Minister Boris Pistorius on the collapse of FCAS with France: That the end for FCAS came was no longer surprising. It had been pointing that way for quite some time. It came down above all to tensions — let me put it that way — between the two major industries. With the knowledge of today, we would not set up this project the way it was set up back then. That is a lesson we must draw from this. It was an ambitious, large European project that has now shattered against reality. We have to live with that. There is absolutely no reason to assume that the German-French relationship is strained because of this. This changes nothing about the relationship with France. There are a multitude of smaller and larger projects on our agenda. As for the new jet — we will see which paths we take. We have already been in talks with various actors for months. You can imagine that I will not publicly speculate here about which project it could be.

Clash Report

17,587 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Demis Hassabis has a test for whether AI is actually creative. Give it only the data Einstein had in 1901 and see if it invents relativity. He thinks today's text models will never pass it. This is his bar for true creativity. Not extrapolating something already known. Generating a genuinely new hypothesis about reality that nobody has reached before. The thing Einstein did in 1905 with a handful of papers that rewrote physics. Hassabis wants to hand an AI the same starting data Einstein had and see if it gets there on its own. No peeking past the cutoff. Then he explained why he doubts text alone can do it. Einstein daydreamed his way to relativity. He was a patent clerk imagining what it would look like to ride alongside a beam of light. He ran the experiment in his head first, then proved it with math. Yann LeCun, who won the Turing Award and ran AI at Meta, says the same thing in blunter terms. He says today's models don't understand the physical world as well as a housecat, and that text alone is "complete BS" as a path to real intelligence. Two of the most decorated minds in AI agree the missing piece is the same. Hassabis thinks an AI needs to understand the world of atoms, not just the world of bits. Most of the industry is racing to scale text models. Hassabis just told them the most important kind of thinking might live somewhere text can't reach. --- Watch the full interview at Semafor on YouTube

Demis Hassabis has a test for whether AI is actually creative. Give it only the data Einstein had in 1901 and see if it invents relativity. He thinks today's text models will never pass it. This is his bar for true creativity. Not extrapolating something already known. Generating a genuinely new hypothesis about reality that nobody has reached before. The thing Einstein did in 1905 with a handful of papers that rewrote physics. Hassabis wants to hand an AI the same starting data Einstein had and see if it gets there on its own. No peeking past the cutoff. Then he explained why he doubts text alone can do it. Einstein daydreamed his way to relativity. He was a patent clerk imagining what it would look like to ride alongside a beam of light. He ran the experiment in his head first, then proved it with math. Yann LeCun, who won the Turing Award and ran AI at Meta, says the same thing in blunter terms. He says today's models don't understand the physical world as well as a housecat, and that text alone is "complete BS" as a path to real intelligence. Two of the most decorated minds in AI agree the missing piece is the same. Hassabis thinks an AI needs to understand the world of atoms, not just the world of bits. Most of the industry is racing to scale text models. Hassabis just told them the most important kind of thinking might live somewhere text can't reach. --- Watch the full interview at Semafor on YouTube

Ihtesham Ali

18,905 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Bob Lazar allegedly watched people fly a UFO at Area 51. “They knew how to fly it.” “The craft had a corona discharge glow on the bottom and lifted off silently up into the sky … ” And it had one shocking, anomalous effect that still perplexes him to this day: As Lazar watched, his supervisor Dennis Mariani told him to go stand directly underneath the craft. “I walked out underneath it and … I looked up, and I couldn’t see the craft.” “I thought it flew away.” “Then he said to come back, and I walked back.” “I see the edge of the craft.” “If you move, you can see it, and if you walk underneath it, you can’t.” “So you can clearly see it’s bending the light.” “You can see the sky above the craft, so you can see that it’s in its little envelope.” Lazar was also convinced that someone was actually inside the craft as it flew. “I did notice there was a … VHF radio.” “And they’re in communication.” “It made me almost positive that there was somebody in the craft.” He heard a voice coming “from the VHF radio, but presumably coming from the craft.” “They must have had some instrumentation set up in the craft, because he was monitoring something.” “I was stuck on the fact that, how is a radio wave of getting into the craft?” “This doesn’t even make any sense.” “It should be distorted by the gravity wave going around it.” “Clearly, they’ve had a lot of time with this craft already.” “It could have been decades for all I know.” “They knew how to fly it.” “These guys were somewhat proficient with it.” Jesse Michels asked Lazar if that means that we actually have “alien reproduction vehicles, or UFOs that humans can fly?” Lazar: “I do not think so, no.” Michels: “So you think we can test these things and use them in rudimentary ways, but we don’t understand how they work?” Lazar: “It’s like the analogy … you can go back to the 1800s and drop off a motorcycle with the keys in it.” “If you tinker with it long enough, someone’s gonna turn the key and it’s gonna start.” “Eventually … they’ll become proficient at driving it.” “But when it runs out of fuel, we’re done.” “And … they can’t even make that plastic fender.” “I think that’s where we are [with UFOs].” “We had some knowledge of that, but I think if we had developed that technology, we would’ve absolutely already seen it.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Bob Lazar allegedly watched people fly a UFO at Area 51. “They knew how to fly it.” “The craft had a corona discharge glow on the bottom and lifted off silently up into the sky … ” And it had one shocking, anomalous effect that still perplexes him to this day: As Lazar watched, his supervisor Dennis Mariani told him to go stand directly underneath the craft. “I walked out underneath it and … I looked up, and I couldn’t see the craft.” “I thought it flew away.” “Then he said to come back, and I walked back.” “I see the edge of the craft.” “If you move, you can see it, and if you walk underneath it, you can’t.” “So you can clearly see it’s bending the light.” “You can see the sky above the craft, so you can see that it’s in its little envelope.” Lazar was also convinced that someone was actually inside the craft as it flew. “I did notice there was a … VHF radio.” “And they’re in communication.” “It made me almost positive that there was somebody in the craft.” He heard a voice coming “from the VHF radio, but presumably coming from the craft.” “They must have had some instrumentation set up in the craft, because he was monitoring something.” “I was stuck on the fact that, how is a radio wave of getting into the craft?” “This doesn’t even make any sense.” “It should be distorted by the gravity wave going around it.” “Clearly, they’ve had a lot of time with this craft already.” “It could have been decades for all I know.” “They knew how to fly it.” “These guys were somewhat proficient with it.” Jesse Michels asked Lazar if that means that we actually have “alien reproduction vehicles, or UFOs that humans can fly?” Lazar: “I do not think so, no.” Michels: “So you think we can test these things and use them in rudimentary ways, but we don’t understand how they work?” Lazar: “It’s like the analogy … you can go back to the 1800s and drop off a motorcycle with the keys in it.” “If you tinker with it long enough, someone’s gonna turn the key and it’s gonna start.” “Eventually … they’ll become proficient at driving it.” “But when it runs out of fuel, we’re done.” “And … they can’t even make that plastic fender.” “I think that’s where we are [with UFOs].” “We had some knowledge of that, but I think if we had developed that technology, we would’ve absolutely already seen it.” Jesse Michels American Alchemy

Holden Culotta

174,546 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

"The Evidence is Disappearing" Kevin McKernan - "We have a person who had 4 Pfizer [mRNA] 'vaccines' [and a year later] came down with a colon cancer [and there] were 3 biopsies taken [then we looked to see] if there's any Pfizer sequence in there...and there is, and shockingly there's a lot of it"

"The Evidence is Disappearing" Kevin McKernan - "We have a person who had 4 Pfizer [mRNA] 'vaccines' [and a year later] came down with a colon cancer [and there] were 3 biopsies taken [then we looked to see] if there's any Pfizer sequence in there...and there is, and shockingly there's a lot of it"

Humanspective

1,349,217 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

The smartest man in AI just exposed the whole AGI narrative as a LIE. And he used a physics problem from 1905 to prove it. His name is Demis Hassabis. He runs Google DeepMind, and won the Nobel Prize for using AI to crack a problem in biology that had stumped scientists for 50 years. Almost nobody in this industry has a track record like his. He went on the NothingButTech podcast and called out the biggest lie in AI right now: Right now the loudest voices in AI are telling you that AGI is basically here. OpenAI has literally defined AGI as a system that can outperform humans at most "economically valuable work." In other words, if it replaces enough jobs, we have arrived. Hassabis thinks that bar is a joke. He said real general intelligence has to do what the human brain can do, because the brain is the only proof we have that this kind of intelligence is even possible. He called that "a higher bar than just being able to do some useful economic work," which is about as close as a polite British Nobel laureate gets to calling his rivals out. Then he gave the actual test: Today's AI has read everything humans have ever written, including the theory of relativity. So when it explains relativity back to you, it's repeating an answer that already exists. That's not intelligence. So Hassabis proposed a test that makes memorization impossible. Train an AI on only what humanity knew in 1901, four years BEFORE Einstein published relativity. Then ask it to come up with relativity on its own. It can't look up the answer, because in 1901 the answer doesn't exist yet. The only way to pass is to do what Einstein actually did: Take the same physics everyone else had and reason its way to an idea no human had ever had. Hassabis says not a single AI today can, no matter how much it has memorized. Which means what we keep calling "almost AGI" is really just the best librarian in history. It can find any answer that already exists but it cannot create one that doesn't. His second version is even sharper: AlphaGo, the system his own team built, famously invented a brand new move that no human had played in 2,000 years of the game. Everyone called it genius but Hassabis says that still is not the bar. The real test is not whether an AI can invent a new move inside Go, it is whether an AI could INVENT a game as deep and as beautiful as Go in the first place. No model that exists today can do it. The people telling you AGI has already arrived are the same people raising hundreds of billions of dollars on that exact promise. The valuations only work if the finish line is right in front of us. So the finish line keeps getting dragged closer, and AGI keeps getting quietly redefined down to "does useful work," until the products they already sell happen to qualify. Hassabis has nothing to prove and nothing to sell you. He already won the Nobel, and he is telling you the machines still cannot do the one thing that would make them genuinely intelligent, which is have a truly original idea. To be fair to him, he is not a pessimist about it. He believes real AGI IS coming, and he is spending his life building it. He just refuses to pretend it is already sitting in your phone. So the next time a founder tells you AGI is months away, remember that the one man in the room with a Nobel Prize built his test around Einstein, and admitted that nothing we have made can pass it. What do you think?

Ricardo

1,288,115 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten