Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

The Empire State Building proposal is a cool and romantic stunt. The problem is not the act itself, but the unrealistic expectations it creates in women. When social media and culture push grand romantic gestures as the bare minimum, many women begin to believe that if a man does... show more

Kangmin Lee | 이강민

252,775 subscribers

11,282 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Nadia Whittome MP The bare minimum that women are asking is not to have to share a women-only space with men like this. And yet you still fight for him and not them. Why?

Nadia Whittome MP The bare minimum that women are asking is not to have to share a women-only space with men like this. And yet you still fight for him and not them. Why?

Jill Foster

43,904 views • 2 months ago

Removing Israel from FIFA is not a punishment. It is the bare minimum. A state that bombs stadiums, kills players, and turns Lebanon’s children into names on empty shirts should not enter the pitch as if it were a normal country. Sport does not cleanse occupation.

Removing Israel from FIFA is not a punishment. It is the bare minimum. A state that bombs stadiums, kills players, and turns Lebanon’s children into names on empty shirts should not enter the pitch as if it were a normal country. Sport does not cleanse occupation.

SilencedSirs◼️

12,726 views • 3 months ago

Ben Carson is so wise,.. I absolutely love his take here re: Gay Sex “I believe God loves everybody, but I don’t believe that it was intended that men have sex with men and women have sex with women For those who want to do it are free to do it, but trying to say that’s the Norm and everyone should conform to that, does not make any sense What we should be doing is making sure the Norm recognizes there are things that are not consistent with the Norm and that we need to learn how to tolerate those things…”

Sensitive content

Ben Carson is so wise,.. I absolutely love his take here re: Gay Sex “I believe God loves everybody, but I don’t believe that it was intended that men have sex with men and women have sex with women For those who want to do it are free to do it, but trying to say that’s the Norm and everyone should conform to that, does not make any sense What we should be doing is making sure the Norm recognizes there are things that are not consistent with the Norm and that we need to learn how to tolerate those things…”

MJTruthUltra

3,874,149 views • 2 years ago

Men should NOT be in women's restrooms. See? It's not that hard to say. But it seems the modern state of the democratic party won't let you say that if you want to get elected to be the governor of California. Eric DID NOT want to say men should not be in women's restrooms. This is the modern state of the democratic party. Believing a man should be able to put a wig on, say he's a woman and start going into women's restrooms as if he is actually a woman..

Men should NOT be in women's restrooms. See? It's not that hard to say. But it seems the modern state of the democratic party won't let you say that if you want to get elected to be the governor of California. Eric DID NOT want to say men should not be in women's restrooms. This is the modern state of the democratic party. Believing a man should be able to put a wig on, say he's a woman and start going into women's restrooms as if he is actually a woman..

Jeffery Mead

35,508 views • 9 months ago

This man, I don’t even call him a sheikh. He’s promoting honor killings as a form of discipline. He’s saying Somali men are like Afghan men. Does he not know that Afghan men sleep with young boys? Does he not know that Afghan men are terrorists? Does he not know that Afghan men torture their own women? Yet he wants to compare Somali men to them, indirectly or directly telling Somali men to follow in the footsteps of Afghan men. This is the same man who is married to a non-Somali woman and has mixed children, yet he wants to give advice to Somali men on how to deal with Somali women. This isn’t the first time he’s said things like this. He needs to be stopped and reported He is promoting extremist ideas and inciting hatred and violence against women, and that is completely unacceptable. someone married to non Somali woman, he doesn’t have any saying regarding any Somali women’s affairs.

This man, I don’t even call him a sheikh. He’s promoting honor killings as a form of discipline. He’s saying Somali men are like Afghan men. Does he not know that Afghan men sleep with young boys? Does he not know that Afghan men are terrorists? Does he not know that Afghan men torture their own women? Yet he wants to compare Somali men to them, indirectly or directly telling Somali men to follow in the footsteps of Afghan men. This is the same man who is married to a non-Somali woman and has mixed children, yet he wants to give advice to Somali men on how to deal with Somali women. This isn’t the first time he’s said things like this. He needs to be stopped and reported He is promoting extremist ideas and inciting hatred and violence against women, and that is completely unacceptable. someone married to non Somali woman, he doesn’t have any saying regarding any Somali women’s affairs.

Maryan

110,711 views • 2 months ago

Nobody is actually gay. There are men who want other men. There are acts. There is appetite. There is no inner species, no genetic cause, no finished type of human who is thereby excused from women, children, status, or the rest of male life. “Gay” is the name of the conversion process, not the name of a discovery. It takes a want and turns it into an identity, then treats the identity as a life sentence. That is why I say gay rights are a men’s-rights issue. A man who accepts the label is taught that he has taken himself out of the ordinary market with fewer claims on women, less expected competition. Women benefit when high-agency men are recoded as non-competitors. Institutions that live off female preference, safety narratives, and identity management amplify the recoding. The man finishes the job on himself. That is the psyop: not that male-male sex was invented last week, but that a behavior was moralized into a total category whose social function is removal. This is just not the case. Sex with men does not sterilize you. It does not cancel your capacity to have children. It does not rewrite your future unless you agree to the rewrite. Men have done both in every century that left records. The rule that one appetite closes the other is a recent administrative fiction. Reproduction is an act and a decision, not a sacrament you forfeit by touching another man. Trust. You can just do things. Want men. Have sex with men. Do not become the product. Do not accept exile. Do not treat a preference as a veto on women, children, or agency. The appetite can exist without the off-ramp. The off-ramp is the part that was sold to you... or whatever, it doesn’t really matter to be honest—artificial wombs and IVG will be here soon and women will no longer control access to reproduction.

Nobody is actually gay. There are men who want other men. There are acts. There is appetite. There is no inner species, no genetic cause, no finished type of human who is thereby excused from women, children, status, or the rest of male life. “Gay” is the name of the conversion process, not the name of a discovery. It takes a want and turns it into an identity, then treats the identity as a life sentence. That is why I say gay rights are a men’s-rights issue. A man who accepts the label is taught that he has taken himself out of the ordinary market with fewer claims on women, less expected competition. Women benefit when high-agency men are recoded as non-competitors. Institutions that live off female preference, safety narratives, and identity management amplify the recoding. The man finishes the job on himself. That is the psyop: not that male-male sex was invented last week, but that a behavior was moralized into a total category whose social function is removal. This is just not the case. Sex with men does not sterilize you. It does not cancel your capacity to have children. It does not rewrite your future unless you agree to the rewrite. Men have done both in every century that left records. The rule that one appetite closes the other is a recent administrative fiction. Reproduction is an act and a decision, not a sacrament you forfeit by touching another man. Trust. You can just do things. Want men. Have sex with men. Do not become the product. Do not accept exile. Do not treat a preference as a veto on women, children, or agency. The appetite can exist without the off-ramp. The off-ramp is the part that was sold to you... or whatever, it doesn’t really matter to be honest—artificial wombs and IVG will be here soon and women will no longer control access to reproduction.

Francesco 🇺🇸

28,401 views • 18 days ago

SNEAKO pushes back on Andrew Tate’s views on women, saying Islam teaches men to protect and value women, not treat them as inferior or "programmable objects." ☪️ "But the misconception is that there's hatred of women, But in Islam, we're supposed to protect women. We need to understand how important they are. Women are not objects that are programmable. Women are not beneath us. Women are not inferior." "And these people really believe that they're better than women, that they're supposed to be exalted above them. And that's false, and the Redpill goes in that direction, and that's wrong."

SNEAKO pushes back on Andrew Tate’s views on women, saying Islam teaches men to protect and value women, not treat them as inferior or "programmable objects." ☪️ "But the misconception is that there's hatred of women, But in Islam, we're supposed to protect women. We need to understand how important they are. Women are not objects that are programmable. Women are not beneath us. Women are not inferior." "And these people really believe that they're better than women, that they're supposed to be exalted above them. And that's false, and the Redpill goes in that direction, and that's wrong."

SNEAKO UPDATES

19,760 views • 3 months ago

Nawaz Muthu T has renovated a15 yera old Gym and turned it into an "Islam-Friendly" Gym in Palakkad, Kerala. The rules of the Gym: - Women and men should not work out together. Women and Men should have a separate time and separate space. - There should be no loud music. - Women should wear Islamic clothes. The video below is not from that Gym but you can expect such scenes from that gym, ofcourse without men and music.

Nawaz Muthu T has renovated a15 yera old Gym and turned it into an "Islam-Friendly" Gym in Palakkad, Kerala. The rules of the Gym: - Women and men should not work out together. Women and Men should have a separate time and separate space. - There should be no loud music. - Women should wear Islamic clothes. The video below is not from that Gym but you can expect such scenes from that gym, ofcourse without men and music.

Incognito

22,308 views • 3 months ago

52 push ups in 1 minute puts me in the excellent class on the mens 30-39 age group in the Secret Service Fitness Test. As women looking to fill roles typically held by men such as Special Forces, Infantry, SWAT, EP and LEO, we need to demand the standards are the same. If the Govt wants to break down stereotypes, build stronger teams, and attract the best talent, we as women should demand equal standards not only in pay as many do already, but also in performance. The last thing I want is men to worry about their lives because I am on the clock. Women will never be as strong as men, not even a question, but there are a ton of tasks that I am more than capable of doing. If my partner weighs #245 I need them to know I can fireman carry them to safety! The point is we will never know our true potential if we are constantly coddled with some unrealistic barrier that the fog of chaos will not respect in the climax of disorder. Hollywood is to blame primarily, as they continue to make unrealistic action heroes where the frail bodies of women are somehow equivalent to the super jacked bodies of the men. Chaos does not care what you look like, only if you can get the job done and the closest thing to knowing, is constantly testing the ability. Not every man can be a Navy Seal and not every woman should be able to hold highly physical roles, that is totally normal. To be the best of anything you have to dig deep in the soul and train far past what you think you are capable of doing.

52 push ups in 1 minute puts me in the excellent class on the mens 30-39 age group in the Secret Service Fitness Test. As women looking to fill roles typically held by men such as Special Forces, Infantry, SWAT, EP and LEO, we need to demand the standards are the same. If the Govt wants to break down stereotypes, build stronger teams, and attract the best talent, we as women should demand equal standards not only in pay as many do already, but also in performance. The last thing I want is men to worry about their lives because I am on the clock. Women will never be as strong as men, not even a question, but there are a ton of tasks that I am more than capable of doing. If my partner weighs #245 I need them to know I can fireman carry them to safety! The point is we will never know our true potential if we are constantly coddled with some unrealistic barrier that the fog of chaos will not respect in the climax of disorder. Hollywood is to blame primarily, as they continue to make unrealistic action heroes where the frail bodies of women are somehow equivalent to the super jacked bodies of the men. Chaos does not care what you look like, only if you can get the job done and the closest thing to knowing, is constantly testing the ability. Not every man can be a Navy Seal and not every woman should be able to hold highly physical roles, that is totally normal. To be the best of anything you have to dig deep in the soul and train far past what you think you are capable of doing.

Margaux Alvarez

186,053 views • 2 years ago

$Feminism treats men as a problem, family as an obstacle, and motherhood as a prison. It hollowed out marriage, destabilized identity, fractured communities, and created a culture where men are either infantilized or demonized. It produced a generation that has no model for the complementary dance between men and women, no respect for the natural order, and no vocabulary for discussing virtues like sacrifice, leadership, or family loyalty without being accused of oppression. But it is a catastrophic mistake to romanticize Islam as the answer. Islam appears to offer clarity, structure, and order: defined gender roles, strong masculinity, modesty, family cohesion, and a rejection of the nihilistic confusion that dominates liberal culture. For people who feel betrayed by radical feminism, Islam looks like the promise of a world where men can be men, women can be women, and families regain their dignity. But this is an illusion. Islam is not the cure for Western decay. Islam is the opposite extreme, a system built on hierarchy enforced by fear, legalism, and theological supremacy. It is a rigid structure that suppresses women’s agency, inhibits intellectual growth, and governs relationships through coercion rather than maturity. Both, feminism and Islam, are driven by fear. Both fail to produce healthy, flourishing partnerships between men and women. Christian complementarity holds that men and women are equal in dignity, different in nature, and designed for a cooperative relationship that reflects balance, not rivalry. It does not erase the differences nor weaponize them. It does not make men tyrants nor women adversaries. It builds a moral ecology in which love, sacrifice, responsibility, and authority coexist without canceling one another. Christianity rejects the radical feminist myth that liberation requires abolishing the family, and it rejects the Islamic myth that stability requires suppressing women. It recognizes that order comes from harmony, not domination; from virtue, not coercion; from internal formation, not legal surveillance. This is why Western families, for centuries, produced stable societies. This is why Western institutions respected women without needing to imprison them behind veils or exclude them from public life. Christian complementarity treats men and women as partners in a shared moral project. Islam treats them as participants in a chain of command. Radical feminism sees them as enemies locked in perpetual conflict. Only Christianity offers the adult understanding: the sexes are interdependent, not interchangeable; equal, not identical; complementary, not competitive.$

Feminism treats men as a problem, family as an obstacle, and motherhood as a prison. It hollowed out marriage, destabilized identity, fractured communities, and created a culture where men are either infantilized or demonized. It produced a generation that has no model for the complementary dance between men and women, no respect for the natural order, and no vocabulary for discussing virtues like sacrifice, leadership, or family loyalty without being accused of oppression. But it is a catastrophic mistake to romanticize Islam as the answer. Islam appears to offer clarity, structure, and order: defined gender roles, strong masculinity, modesty, family cohesion, and a rejection of the nihilistic confusion that dominates liberal culture. For people who feel betrayed by radical feminism, Islam looks like the promise of a world where men can be men, women can be women, and families regain their dignity. But this is an illusion. Islam is not the cure for Western decay. Islam is the opposite extreme, a system built on hierarchy enforced by fear, legalism, and theological supremacy. It is a rigid structure that suppresses women’s agency, inhibits intellectual growth, and governs relationships through coercion rather than maturity. Both, feminism and Islam, are driven by fear. Both fail to produce healthy, flourishing partnerships between men and women. Christian complementarity holds that men and women are equal in dignity, different in nature, and designed for a cooperative relationship that reflects balance, not rivalry. It does not erase the differences nor weaponize them. It does not make men tyrants nor women adversaries. It builds a moral ecology in which love, sacrifice, responsibility, and authority coexist without canceling one another. Christianity rejects the radical feminist myth that liberation requires abolishing the family, and it rejects the Islamic myth that stability requires suppressing women. It recognizes that order comes from harmony, not domination; from virtue, not coercion; from internal formation, not legal surveillance. This is why Western families, for centuries, produced stable societies. This is why Western institutions respected women without needing to imprison them behind veils or exclude them from public life. Christian complementarity treats men and women as partners in a shared moral project. Islam treats them as participants in a chain of command. Radical feminism sees them as enemies locked in perpetual conflict. Only Christianity offers the adult understanding: the sexes are interdependent, not interchangeable; equal, not identical; complementary, not competitive.

Dan Burmawi

13,200 views • 9 months ago

Heated argument over the growing culture of begging in our society. The lady insisted that when a man calls a woman and asks if she has eaten, and she responds, “No,” it could simply mean that she has not eaten or that she is hinting at something she has been craving. According to her, this should not necessarily be seen as forcing the man to provide for her. However, the man insisted that many Nigerian women have a “collecting mentality” and expect men to provide for them.

Heated argument over the growing culture of begging in our society. The lady insisted that when a man calls a woman and asks if she has eaten, and she responds, “No,” it could simply mean that she has not eaten or that she is hinting at something she has been craving. According to her, this should not necessarily be seen as forcing the man to provide for her. However, the man insisted that many Nigerian women have a “collecting mentality” and expect men to provide for them.

CHUKS 🍥

720,082 views • 8 days ago

We are living in a time where more men are being more vocal about their feelings which many women have said they have wanted for a long time. However, some women are struggling with accepting what men have to say when it comes to them having to accept that all relationship problems are not caused by men. This is not meant to be an attack on women but many women take it as an attack and are way more interested in defending women than actually understanding what men are trying to say. It tends to be more challenging for women to emotionally regulate and to accept accountability, not because they are flawed, but because of the conditioning and training that has taught women that men are less intelligent and more than often the problem. Quality men, which there are plenty of but are often overlooked and not talked about, are tired of being blamed for everything and are no longer willing to tolerate it. They want to make it clear that most men are not like the stereotypical bs that our society teaches about men. It has been challenging because it's difficult for many women to accept because of their personal experiences from choosing and dealing with lesser quality men.

We are living in a time where more men are being more vocal about their feelings which many women have said they have wanted for a long time. However, some women are struggling with accepting what men have to say when it comes to them having to accept that all relationship problems are not caused by men. This is not meant to be an attack on women but many women take it as an attack and are way more interested in defending women than actually understanding what men are trying to say. It tends to be more challenging for women to emotionally regulate and to accept accountability, not because they are flawed, but because of the conditioning and training that has taught women that men are less intelligent and more than often the problem. Quality men, which there are plenty of but are often overlooked and not talked about, are tired of being blamed for everything and are no longer willing to tolerate it. They want to make it clear that most men are not like the stereotypical bs that our society teaches about men. It has been challenging because it's difficult for many women to accept because of their personal experiences from choosing and dealing with lesser quality men.

Tamorah Shareef Muhammad

12,431,216 views • 2 years ago

“ Both men and women ought to be called to a life of virtue. Both sexes need to hear the truth about sacrifice, commitment, and the selfless service that leads to fruitful relationships, whether that culminates in marriage or not. We’re here today to begin to lay out a better vision for women. One that while, unabashedly, is conservative, is not confined to the memes and caricatures that the left promotes of us.” - Jennifer Galardi

“ Both men and women ought to be called to a life of virtue. Both sexes need to hear the truth about sacrifice, commitment, and the selfless service that leads to fruitful relationships, whether that culminates in marriage or not. We’re here today to begin to lay out a better vision for women. One that while, unabashedly, is conservative, is not confined to the memes and caricatures that the left promotes of us.” - Jennifer Galardi

Heritage Foundation

21,127 views • 6 months ago

This man did not do a proper research here. The problem is not a black man but a White men and women in South Africa. Crime must not be black while the reason for it is from a White person

This man did not do a proper research here. The problem is not a black man but a White men and women in South Africa. Crime must not be black while the reason for it is from a White person

Stimela Ntshangase 🇿🇦🇶🇦🇲🇿🇰🇪🇷🇺

132,109 views • 2 years ago

“You’re not a lesbian,” says the man. This is what gender ideology does: it erases women, it spits on lesbians, and it calls that progress. The hatred is raw. The homophobia is vicious. And it always comes out when we say no to men.

“You’re not a lesbian,” says the man. This is what gender ideology does: it erases women, it spits on lesbians, and it calls that progress. The hatred is raw. The homophobia is vicious. And it always comes out when we say no to men.

WomenAreReal

430,229 views • 1 year ago