Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The first nuclear use since 1945 could be sold as a harmless demonstration shot on an empty Iranian mountain... Pickaxe Mountain sits on the reported target list, buried too deep for conventional bombs, and a scenario circulating among military analysts goes like this: a nuclear bunker buster, framed...

319,460 просмотров • 3 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨🚨🚨 IRAN'S FOREIGN MINISTER JUST SAID THE MOST TERRIFYING 15 WORDS OF THIS ENTIRE WAR. READ EVERY SINGLE ONE. 🚨🚨🚨 "They struck our nuclear facilities, but they could not destroy Iran's nuclear program." That's Iran's FM Abbas Araghchi — CONFIRMING the strikes hit nuclear sites. And telling the world it didn't work. Let that sink in. 💀 The US used its most powerful bunker-buster bombs on Natanz 💀 Iran is publicly CONFIRMING the nuclear sites were hit 💀 And in the SAME sentence saying the program SURVIVED 💀 Iran isn't denying, hiding, or deflecting — they're TAUNTING 💀 "You hit us with everything you had. We're STILL here." ⚠️ The US spent $2,000,000,000,000+ developing the most advanced bunker-buster arsenal on Earth — specifically for this moment. Iran says it wasn't enough. ⚠️ Israel destroyed Iraq's Osirak reactor in 1981 with ONE strike and ended Iraq's nuclear program forever. Iran just took the same hit and said "try again." The media is showing you "US strikes Iran's nuclear facilities" like it's mission accomplished. They're NOT showing you that Iran just told the ENTIRE world: our nuclear program is deeper, more dispersed, and more protected than your best weapons can reach. Here's what that means → and what comes NEXT: → Iran built Natanz underground. The US bombed it. Iran says it survived. → Iran built Fordow INSIDE A MOUNTAIN. If Natanz survived, Fordow is untouchable. → Iran has spent 20 years building redundancy — multiple sites, multiple depths, multiple locations → The US just used its BEST shot. If it didn't work, there is no Plan B short of a nuclear weapon. Now here's the part nobody is saying out loud: Iran's nuclear program just went from "peaceful enrichment" to "existential survival." Before today, Iran could negotiate. They had leverage. They could trade their program for sanctions relief. After today? Their nuclear facilities have been BOMBED. The diplomatic path is DEAD. If you're Iran and your "peaceful" nuclear sites were just attacked — what's the argument for NOT building a weapon anymore? The US didn't destroy Iran's nuclear program. They just gave Iran the justification to FINISH it. Every nuclear expert on Earth is thinking the same thing right now: the clock to an Iranian bomb just got shorter, not longer. What happens next: → Iran accelerates enrichment at sites the US CAN'T reach → Iran withdraws from the NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) → The IAEA loses ALL access to Iranian nuclear sites → Within 12-18 months, Iran has enough material for a weapon → And the world has ZERO visibility into what's happening underground The most dangerous sentence in geopolitics isn't a threat. It's "you hit us and we're still standing." Iran just said it. To the entire world. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 They don't want you seeing this. Follow + RT to beat the algorithm. 🚨

🇨🇳 陈杰森 Jason Chen

813,482 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The cold is British. They just never told you. ❄️🇬🇧 Every air conditioner, every fridge, every freezer on earth, the cold inside all of it was first made by a Scotsman. In 1756. ❄️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 His name was William Cullen, a doctor in Edinburgh. In a warm room, with no ice and no winter, he drew the air from a glass of ether until it boiled cold and drank the heat from the water around it, until the water froze. No one had ever done it before. Then he wrote it down and walked away. No machine, no patent, no fortune. Just the proof, on a bench. It sat there the better part of a century. A British bench built the first machine that worked, and a Scot carried it across the world to Australia, where it froze meat and cooled beer. But cold was only half the story. ❄️📖 To master the air itself took another Scot. When the Houses of Parliament burned down in 1834, David Boswell Reid made the new building breathe, its gothic spires its lungs. At St George's Hall in Liverpool in 1851 he built what is often called the first air-conditioned building on earth. It should have made him. He died forgotten in America instead. 40 years on, Willis Carrier built the machine and earned his name as the father of modern air conditioning. He earned every bit of it. But he did not make the cold. The cold was British. America took that inheritance and cooled the world with it, and that is no theft. That is what an inheritance is for. We are the home of British heroes. Not built by ads, not by the government, built by us. There's a place for you with us. Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

56,179 просмотров • 25 дней назад

#WATCH | On being asked about the West Asia conflict and where the Islamabad MoU stands right now, Senior Journalist, Political Commentator & Author, Fareed Zakaria says, "It's completely dead. It was predictable that it would be dead... Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon that can be used as leverage, which is control over the Strait of Hormuz...What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" "It's completely dead. And it was predictable that it would be dead because it is a memorandum of misunderstanding...Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon, in other words, a weapon that is actually more powerful because it can be used as leverage. That leverage is control over the Strait of Hormuz, and they want to assert that power...To give you an understanding of how poorly this war has gone for the United States, remember President Trump's original goal, which was to destroy the Iranian regime, have the people of Iran launch an uprising, and bring democracy to Iran. That didn't work. The goal number two became the nuclear issue...The desire to get the Iranians to hand over their enriched uranium, swear that they would never use it again, and permanently end the program none of that has happened. The third goal then became control of the Strait of Hormuz, which, of course, was open before the war. What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" Watch full interview here:

ANI

48,501 просмотров • 6 дней назад

Arestovich on Ukraine's attack yesterday not just on Putin's residence, but on a "nuclear decision-making center": According to Western sources, there was a strike. I'm not saying this; they're saying this. Secondly, it wasn't just a residence. It was a special Russian facility designed to command and control the Russian armed forces in the event of a nuclear war. So, in terms of significance, it's like someone attacking Air Force One, the US presidential plane. It's a special facility, an entire city with outdoor structures, underground structures. And all sorts of communication hubs. According to Western sources, drones were flying. 90 or 91, no one knows. But they were most likely targeting the communication hubs. They're verifying this information. And frankly, they didn't reach their destination. But there was a strike. Why are Russians so outraged? Well, because it was a strike on the command center of the nuclear triad and the Russian armed forces in general during a special period, during a large-scale war. That is, this is an attack on the holy of holies, and according to Russian nuclear doctrine, and the nuclear doctrine of any state possessing nuclear weapons, this is grounds for a nuclear response. Russia will not strike Kyiv with tactical nuclear weapons. This would be a sharp escalation, a change in the entire international framework. They won't agree to that. But the "Oreshnik" missile could land. I think it's almost 100% certain that ballistic missiles will hit the decision-making center. "POOL N3"

Victor vicktop55 commentary

78,894 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Hamas is a terrorist organization. This is not something that I am saying. This is something that we all know. It is reality. A reality studied and legally confirmed by the European Union who clearly recognizes Hamas as it is. A dangerous Islamic terrorist organization. Dangerous to whom? To all of us. A threat to our security. This is why an organization is put on the list of terrorist organizations in the first place. So to my colleagues in the EU, my question is simple. How are we, the representatives of this parliament supposed to feel safe when a member of this house, elected to represent our countries, citizens and freedom goes to a demonstration in a foreign country, namely Jordan, and stands enthusiastically among protests who have slogans supporting Hamas, the terrorist organization that is recognize by us as such and that demonstrated its level of cruelty and bloodthirst? According to the French newspaper Le Point this member was left-wing MEP Rima Hassan. She participated to a pro-Hamas demonstration in Jordan where participants honored Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh with slogans glorifying jihad and threatening to remove Jews from Jerusalem. Rima Hassan enthusiastically attended the demonstration and published the videos on her social media. Again, Hamas is recognized by the EU as an Islamic terrorist organization and has killed, kidnapped and raped innocent people on October 7 and long before as we all know. It is a terrorist organization that means hell for Palestinians and Israelis and represents a serious danger to Europe, hence its presence on the EU list of terrorist organizations. So on the one hand, we have the hostages and the innocent victims.On the other hand, we have the Hamas terrorists and their friends from Iran and Hezbollah. On whose side do we want to stand as European Parliament? I may hope that all of us will stand on the side of the hostages, of the innocent, of our own citizens and societies. On the side of freedom and security. My point in plenary this week about European values and choices. Assita Kanko

Assita Kanko MEP

452,565 просмотров • 1 год назад

Dr. Edward Teller, the father of the hydrogen bomb, on what nuclear weapons can actually do to the planet, and what they can't: In a 1963 interview, Teller was asked whether the year's violent weather might be linked to nuclear test explosions. His response cuts through the panic of the era: "You know that there have been few things that have not been dragged in to explain the weather. And furthermore, there have been few disagreeable occurrences that have not been blamed on nuclear tests." But Teller doesn't dismiss the concern. He reframes it with scale: "In actual fact, nuclear explosions are far too small to change the weather. Much greater energy is involved in thunderstorms and in cyclones and in cold fronts than nuclear explosions could possibly produce." Then he pivots to where the connection is real: earthquakes. Underground nuclear tests, he explains, gave science something it had never had before: a known quantity of energy to compare against natural seismic events. "For the first time, we have a reliable figure for the actual amount of energy found in an earthquake." The interviewer pushes on the obvious worry. Could a test trigger a catastrophic quake? Teller is measured: "There is a chance that a nuclear explosion right on top of a fault that is ready to go off might trigger the motion of that fault… At any rate, nuclear explosions in areas which are relatively stable from the point of view of earthquakes will certainly not trigger them." Then comes the most striking idea in the interview. Teller floats a counterintuitive use of the technology: "Some people have even proposed that nuclear explosions at some time might be used to control earthquakes. Instead of getting tensions built up for 50 years and then making a big earthquake, a big slippage that destroyed San Francisco, one could have a little slippage, which is right harmless, once every year. Let us say on the 4th of July." He's quick to add a dose of realism: "But probably people won't consent, and furthermore, I doubt that it can be done." Teller closes with a vision that gives a name to an entire ambition of the era. Using nuclear power not as a weapon, but as a construction tool for reshaping the planet itself. "I am quite sure that large earth-moving, such as the building of canals, would be entirely possible. I like to call this kind of an approach geographical engineering."

History Nerd

38,262 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

An Ode to Babita Deokaran She began quietly 30 years ago as a clerk, in the service of the state and worked her way to chief director of financial accounting. Step by step, through dedication and honesty, she rose until she carried one of the heaviest burdens the finances of a hospital meant for the poorest among us. It was not ambition, not politics, but conscience that guided her. She saw the numbers, she saw the theft, and she refused to look away. R850 million flagged by her hand became the light that revealed the full rot: more than R2 billion looted from the sick, the dying, the desperate. Money meant for bandages, for medicine, for life itself stolen. Babita Deokaran paid the ultimate price for her honesty. We mourn her not only as a whistle-blower, not only as a martyr, but as a public servant who believed her duty was sacred. Her death will forever shame those who profit from the suffering of the poor. Let history record: if we know about this grand theft today, it is because she stood up when silence was safer. And let us also honour those who carried her torch journalists like Jeff Wicks 🇿🇦 of News24, who refused to let her story be buried, who insisted that South Africa look at the truth, no matter how ugly. Babita’s name must never fade. Her story is a prayer, a warning, and a promise: That one life of integrity can expose billions of rands in betrayal. That courage, even when it costs everything, can illuminate a nation’s conscience. May her sacrifice not be in vain.

Goolam

78,682 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад