Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The foundational science we're told to "trust" is built on a semantic shell game. A deep dive into vaccine trial methodology reveals a disturbing pattern of linguistic trickery that protects a status quo at the expense of public health. As researcher Toby Rogers points out, the core of the...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

462,593 subscribers

143,906 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessScience & TechnologyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The Unethical Circle of Vaccine Science, Exposed by Its Own Architects. A stunning admission is playing out in plain sight. Former FDA Chief and Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb is making his second media tour, laser-focused on one thing: stopping RFK Jr. from linking the aluminum adjuvant in vaccines to autism. Why such intense, specific concern from a man at the very heart of the pharmaceutical industry? The reason reveals an unforgivable flaw at the foundation of modern vaccine science. As highlighted in recent hearings, there has never been a placebo-controlled safety study on injected aluminum adjuvants. You will not find a study where one group gets aluminum and another gets saline. The official reason? It would be "unethical." Think about that. It's "unethical" to test the safety of a substance they have been injecting into billions of people, including children, for decades. Why is it unethical? Because aluminum is not a vitamin. It's a neurotoxicant with no beneficial role in the human body. Injecting it purely for a safety trial would offer the subject no benefit, only potential harm. Therefore, it's illegal. So let's state this clearly: 1. They admit it's unethical to inject aluminum to study its harm. 2. Yet, they have no ethical problem making it a "core ingredient" in almost every childhood vaccine. This is the indefensible circle: They never did the safety trial to establish a baseline of harm. They can't do it now because it would be unethical. But they continue to mandate the product. And Gottlieb’s own quote says it all: "If you take out aluminum, you'll destroy the whole vaccine program." That is the entire problem in one sentence. The program depends on an ingredient whose standalone safety has never been—and can ethically never be—established. This isn't conspiracy. This is the admission of a former FDA chief. The conversation has moved from "safe and effective" to "too big to fail." Where is the transparent science?
2:04

The Unethical Circle of Vaccine Science, Exposed by Its Own Architects. A stunning admission is playing out in plain sight. Former FDA Chief and Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb is making his second media tour, laser-focused on one thing: stopping RFK Jr. from linking the aluminum adjuvant in vaccines to autism. Why such intense, specific concern from a man at the very heart of the pharmaceutical industry? The reason reveals an unforgivable flaw at the foundation of modern vaccine science. As highlighted in recent hearings, there has never been a placebo-controlled safety study on injected aluminum adjuvants. You will not find a study where one group gets aluminum and another gets saline. The official reason? It would be "unethical." Think about that. It's "unethical" to test the safety of a substance they have been injecting into billions of people, including children, for decades. Why is it unethical? Because aluminum is not a vitamin. It's a neurotoxicant with no beneficial role in the human body. Injecting it purely for a safety trial would offer the subject no benefit, only potential harm. Therefore, it's illegal. So let's state this clearly: 1. They admit it's unethical to inject aluminum to study its harm. 2. Yet, they have no ethical problem making it a "core ingredient" in almost every childhood vaccine. This is the indefensible circle: They never did the safety trial to establish a baseline of harm. They can't do it now because it would be unethical. But they continue to mandate the product. And Gottlieb’s own quote says it all: "If you take out aluminum, you'll destroy the whole vaccine program." That is the entire problem in one sentence. The program depends on an ingredient whose standalone safety has never been—and can ethically never be—established. This isn't conspiracy. This is the admission of a former FDA chief. The conversation has moved from "safe and effective" to "too big to fail." Where is the transparent science?

Camus

33,249 views • 1 year ago

Dr Fauci Admits, "We Don't Do True Placebo Trials On Vaccines." Del Bigtree, CEO, I.C.A.N. 'True Placebo' Is Saline As The Comparative In A Vaccine Control Trial. That's Not What The Gov't Uses. Shocking List Of 'Placebos' Used In Vaccine Clinical Trials. FDA, WHO & CDC Approved Vaccine Trial "Placebo": Thimerosal Mercury & Aluminum Oxide Other Already Approved Vaccines Clinical Trial Vaccines & What Placebo Was Used: HPV Gardasil Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Aluminum Adjuvant & Hep-A Vaccine. Hepatitis A Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Hep-B Vaccine. Influenza A Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Influenza B Vaccine. Meningitis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was DTaP Vaccine. Pertussis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diphtheria & Tetanus Vaccine Prevnar-13 Pneumonia Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Prevnar-7 Vaccine. Hepatitis A Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Aluminum Adjuvant. Prevnar-9 Pneumonia Clinical Trial...Placebo Was DTP-Hib Vaccine. Cholera Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was K-12 E.Coli Vaccine. Prevnar-23 Pneumonia Vaccine...Placebo Was Hep A & Hep-B Vaccine. Polio Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Polio Vaccine. Chicken Pox Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Chicken Pox Vaccine. Shingles Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Shingles Vaccine. Some COVID-19 Vaccine Clinical Trials...Placebo Was Meningitis Vaccine. The Government believes, "Testing a new vaccine against a saline injection is considered unethical." The Government believes, "Depriving half of the trial participants of an older vaccine(which is approved to use as placebo) & giving them a true saline placebo instead would not be fair: it would actually be unethical." The Government believes, "Saline injections don’t cause a sore arm, which might unwittingly reveal to the 'double blind volunteers' that they are in the placebo group. Those who get the experimental vaccine & those who get placebo must be kept secret." This is the most flagrant violation of human rights. causing harm to both children & adults. Crimes against humanity with no informed consent & no true placebo skews all results & makes all vaccines appear "safe & effective" because the adverse events & side effects in both groups are similar. 👇Pediatric Vaccine Clinical Trial Placebos👇 👇Vaccine Trial Placebo Development👇 Speaker: Del Bigtree ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network @MAHAalliance
1:42

Dr Fauci Admits, "We Don't Do True Placebo Trials On Vaccines." Del Bigtree, CEO, I.C.A.N. 'True Placebo' Is Saline As The Comparative In A Vaccine Control Trial. That's Not What The Gov't Uses. Shocking List Of 'Placebos' Used In Vaccine Clinical Trials. FDA, WHO & CDC Approved Vaccine Trial "Placebo": Thimerosal Mercury & Aluminum Oxide Other Already Approved Vaccines Clinical Trial Vaccines & What Placebo Was Used: HPV Gardasil Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Aluminum Adjuvant & Hep-A Vaccine. Hepatitis A Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Hep-B Vaccine. Influenza A Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Influenza B Vaccine. Meningitis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was DTaP Vaccine. Pertussis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diphtheria & Tetanus Vaccine Prevnar-13 Pneumonia Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Prevnar-7 Vaccine. Hepatitis A Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Aluminum Adjuvant. Prevnar-9 Pneumonia Clinical Trial...Placebo Was DTP-Hib Vaccine. Cholera Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was K-12 E.Coli Vaccine. Prevnar-23 Pneumonia Vaccine...Placebo Was Hep A & Hep-B Vaccine. Polio Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Polio Vaccine. Chicken Pox Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Chicken Pox Vaccine. Shingles Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Shingles Vaccine. Some COVID-19 Vaccine Clinical Trials...Placebo Was Meningitis Vaccine. The Government believes, "Testing a new vaccine against a saline injection is considered unethical." The Government believes, "Depriving half of the trial participants of an older vaccine(which is approved to use as placebo) & giving them a true saline placebo instead would not be fair: it would actually be unethical." The Government believes, "Saline injections don’t cause a sore arm, which might unwittingly reveal to the 'double blind volunteers' that they are in the placebo group. Those who get the experimental vaccine & those who get placebo must be kept secret." This is the most flagrant violation of human rights. causing harm to both children & adults. Crimes against humanity with no informed consent & no true placebo skews all results & makes all vaccines appear "safe & effective" because the adverse events & side effects in both groups are similar. 👇Pediatric Vaccine Clinical Trial Placebos👇 👇Vaccine Trial Placebo Development👇 Speaker: Del Bigtree ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network @MAHAalliance

Valerie Anne Smith

1,083,170 views • 1 year ago

There are no double-blind, placebo-based randomized controlled trials for the safety of childhood vaccines. They don't exist because the people responsible for them decided not to do them. I know this because in 2017 Robert F. Kennedy Jr and I sat down at the NIH with Francis Collins and Tony Fauci and asked them. We said, we can't find a single placebo-based safety trial for any vaccine on the childhood schedule. Are you doing them, or are we just not seeing them? They told us they don't do those trials because they believe it is unethical to withhold what they consider a beneficial product from a control group. That is the logic. The faith that the product is so valuable that studying it rigorously would be unfair to the people in the trial not getting it. So they never study it. Every vaccine given to every child in America rests on an assumption of safety and nothing more. Marcello Foa
2:32

There are no double-blind, placebo-based randomized controlled trials for the safety of childhood vaccines. They don't exist because the people responsible for them decided not to do them. I know this because in 2017 Robert F. Kennedy Jr and I sat down at the NIH with Francis Collins and Tony Fauci and asked them. We said, we can't find a single placebo-based safety trial for any vaccine on the childhood schedule. Are you doing them, or are we just not seeing them? They told us they don't do those trials because they believe it is unethical to withhold what they consider a beneficial product from a control group. That is the logic. The faith that the product is so valuable that studying it rigorously would be unfair to the people in the trial not getting it. So they never study it. Every vaccine given to every child in America rests on an assumption of safety and nothing more. Marcello Foa

Del Bigtree

117,747 views • 3 months ago

This isn't a debate. This is a confession. Australian Senator Alex Antic just asked a regulator a simple question: How many gold-standard, placebo-controlled trials are behind the childhood vaccine schedule? The answer will leave you speechless. They admitted they can't provide a number. The justification? It's "ethically questionable" to test vaccines against a true placebo once a treatment is "established." Let's be clear: They are injecting millions of our children with products that have never been tested against an inert saline placebo in long-term trials. Their defense is that the science is "contextual" and the "real-world" evidence is enough. But without that gold-standard comparison, how can we ever truly know the long-term safety profile? How can we quantify the risk vs. benefit without the most basic scientific benchmark? They've replaced the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine—the placebo-controlled trial—with an appeal to authority and decades of "we just know it works." This is a staggering admission that the entire foundation of childhood vaccination relies on a different, lower standard of proof than what is demanded for every other medicine. This isn't conspiracy. This is what they said, under oath. Demand better science.
2:23

This isn't a debate. This is a confession. Australian Senator Alex Antic just asked a regulator a simple question: How many gold-standard, placebo-controlled trials are behind the childhood vaccine schedule? The answer will leave you speechless. They admitted they can't provide a number. The justification? It's "ethically questionable" to test vaccines against a true placebo once a treatment is "established." Let's be clear: They are injecting millions of our children with products that have never been tested against an inert saline placebo in long-term trials. Their defense is that the science is "contextual" and the "real-world" evidence is enough. But without that gold-standard comparison, how can we ever truly know the long-term safety profile? How can we quantify the risk vs. benefit without the most basic scientific benchmark? They've replaced the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine—the placebo-controlled trial—with an appeal to authority and decades of "we just know it works." This is a staggering admission that the entire foundation of childhood vaccination relies on a different, lower standard of proof than what is demanded for every other medicine. This isn't conspiracy. This is what they said, under oath. Demand better science.

Camus

223,624 views • 10 months ago

Big Pharma made a monumental error in their HPV (Gardasil) vaccine trial when they included a proper saline group. This part of an eye opening deposition, shows how adjuvants and vaccines compare to REAL saline/placebo. They try to infer that even inert substances will cause the same rate of adverse events as vaccines and injected adjuvants. But this trial exposes the truth. Dr. Stanley Plotkin exposed by Aaron Siri. After first laying the ground work and getting Dr. Plotkin to answer YES to that systemic belief that adverse events are an "Always on" mechanism built into all clinical trials, Aaron Siri presents him with a paper containing the evidence, with a Gardasil vaccine that had 3 groups, Vaccine, Aluminum Adjuvant and Saline. The Aluminum Adjuvant arm and the vaccine arm had well over 2% auto-immune adverse events. The Saline/Inert group had a 0% Which means - "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction" - NEWTON. When presented with the evidence, watch Dr. Plotkin continue along his path of cognitive dissonance.
3:59

Big Pharma made a monumental error in their HPV (Gardasil) vaccine trial when they included a proper saline group. This part of an eye opening deposition, shows how adjuvants and vaccines compare to REAL saline/placebo. They try to infer that even inert substances will cause the same rate of adverse events as vaccines and injected adjuvants. But this trial exposes the truth. Dr. Stanley Plotkin exposed by Aaron Siri. After first laying the ground work and getting Dr. Plotkin to answer YES to that systemic belief that adverse events are an "Always on" mechanism built into all clinical trials, Aaron Siri presents him with a paper containing the evidence, with a Gardasil vaccine that had 3 groups, Vaccine, Aluminum Adjuvant and Saline. The Aluminum Adjuvant arm and the vaccine arm had well over 2% auto-immune adverse events. The Saline/Inert group had a 0% Which means - "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction" - NEWTON. When presented with the evidence, watch Dr. Plotkin continue along his path of cognitive dissonance.

Humanspective

67,946 views • 10 months ago

🚨 Debunking Grok: Did you know the "gold standard" placebo-controlled trial for Merck's Varivax chickenpox vaccine wasn't a real placebo at all? The package insert calls it a "placebo,” but digging into the actual study documents (linked on the FDA site) reveals that the control group received an injection with ~45mg/mL of neomycin, a potent antibiotic that can cause severe reactions even when applied topically, let alone when injected intramuscularly. Only 956 kids total (465 "placebo") were monitored just weeks for safety. That is too short to detect rare events, and they rigged the control to hide reactions by not using a true placebo and instead using an antibiotic. This is how they "prove" safety. True inert saline placebo? Never done. Full clip from Del Bigtree & Aaron Siri breaking it down 👇 What do YOU think? Is this real science? ⬇️
1:19

🚨 Debunking Grok: Did you know the "gold standard" placebo-controlled trial for Merck's Varivax chickenpox vaccine wasn't a real placebo at all? The package insert calls it a "placebo,” but digging into the actual study documents (linked on the FDA site) reveals that the control group received an injection with ~45mg/mL of neomycin, a potent antibiotic that can cause severe reactions even when applied topically, let alone when injected intramuscularly. Only 956 kids total (465 "placebo") were monitored just weeks for safety. That is too short to detect rare events, and they rigged the control to hide reactions by not using a true placebo and instead using an antibiotic. This is how they "prove" safety. True inert saline placebo? Never done. Full clip from Del Bigtree & Aaron Siri breaking it down 👇 What do YOU think? Is this real science? ⬇️

The HighWire

14,425 views • 10 months ago

Of the 661 studies often cited as proof that childhood vaccines are tested against inert placebos, a detailed breakdown reveals a shocking truth: not a single one was used to license a routine injected vaccine on the CDC schedule with a true saline placebo. Here’s the breakdown by Aaron Siri: ➡️ 567 studies were for non-routine vaccines (e.g., HIV vaccines). Irrelevant. ➡️ Of the remaining 94, 70 did not involve healthy children (e.g., HIV+ adults). Irrelevant. ➡️ Of the remaining 24, 21 did not involve a US-licensed vaccine or a control used to license one. Irrelevant. That leaves just 3 studies. But do they hold up? 1. Varicella (chickenpox) vaccine: Control group was injected with neomycin (an antibiotic), NOT an inert placebo. 2. Gardasil-4: The “inert” control group received everything in the vial except antigens and alum—including L-histidine, sodium borate, and yeast protein. NOT inert. 3. Gardasil-9: A small group received saline, BUT only after first receiving three doses of Gardasil-4. Not a true inert control. The result? ZERO trials with a true inert placebo were used to license any routine childhood vaccine. This isn’t just a statistical oversight—it’s a fundamental flaw in how we assess vaccine safety. Proper safety trials require: ✅ A true inert control (e.g., saline) ✅ Long-term safety review ✅ Sufficient power (large sample size) Not a single routine childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule meets all three criteria. When RFK Jr. highlighted this lack of placebo-controlled data, fact-checkers pointed to the same flawed list of 661 studies. After his analysis debunked them, the list was mysteriously expanded—perhaps hoping a larger number would obscure the truth. The truth remains: without proper controls, we cannot robustly quantify the risks of vaccines. Parents and physicians deserve transparent, high-quality data to make informed decisions.
6:09

Of the 661 studies often cited as proof that childhood vaccines are tested against inert placebos, a detailed breakdown reveals a shocking truth: not a single one was used to license a routine injected vaccine on the CDC schedule with a true saline placebo. Here’s the breakdown by Aaron Siri: ➡️ 567 studies were for non-routine vaccines (e.g., HIV vaccines). Irrelevant. ➡️ Of the remaining 94, 70 did not involve healthy children (e.g., HIV+ adults). Irrelevant. ➡️ Of the remaining 24, 21 did not involve a US-licensed vaccine or a control used to license one. Irrelevant. That leaves just 3 studies. But do they hold up? 1. Varicella (chickenpox) vaccine: Control group was injected with neomycin (an antibiotic), NOT an inert placebo. 2. Gardasil-4: The “inert” control group received everything in the vial except antigens and alum—including L-histidine, sodium borate, and yeast protein. NOT inert. 3. Gardasil-9: A small group received saline, BUT only after first receiving three doses of Gardasil-4. Not a true inert control. The result? ZERO trials with a true inert placebo were used to license any routine childhood vaccine. This isn’t just a statistical oversight—it’s a fundamental flaw in how we assess vaccine safety. Proper safety trials require: ✅ A true inert control (e.g., saline) ✅ Long-term safety review ✅ Sufficient power (large sample size) Not a single routine childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule meets all three criteria. When RFK Jr. highlighted this lack of placebo-controlled data, fact-checkers pointed to the same flawed list of 661 studies. After his analysis debunked them, the list was mysteriously expanded—perhaps hoping a larger number would obscure the truth. The truth remains: without proper controls, we cannot robustly quantify the risks of vaccines. Parents and physicians deserve transparent, high-quality data to make informed decisions.

Camus

59,416 views • 1 year ago

"The FDA & CDC Approved Aluminum As 'Safe & Effective' In Vaccines, Based On A Study Of Only 4 Rabbits." Dr Toby Rogers, PhD "Every Single Shot On The CDC's Childhood Schedule, According To The Best Vaccine Data Set In The World, Causes More Harm Than Benefit." "Aluminum Adjuvants are in more than half of today's vaccines. In the 1990s, protests prompted the FDA & CDC to replace some of the Mercury Adjuvants & began using Aluminum Adjuvants." "As They're taking some Mercury out, they're adding more Aluminum back in." "I actually believe they did that to keep the Autism rates rising, so that they wouldn't be blamed for rising Autism cases in the early 2000s." "The Aluminum safety study used to allow Aluminum into vaccines in the U.S. was based on a study of 4 New Zealand white rabbits." "Anyone who's taken statistics knows that you cannot get statistical significance unless you have a sample size of at least 30." "This is the study the FDA & CDC rely on. In this study, they promptly lost the results from one of the rabbits. So we're down to just 3 rabbits. The results in the rabbits were horrifying." "The rabbits are killed after 28 days & the Aluminum Adjuvants are still there. At the endpoint, Aluminum retention in the body & organs was 94% for Aluminum Hydroxide & 78% for Aluminum Phosphate." "The theory & narrative told by the FDA & CDC has always been that the body excretes the Aluminum thru the urine & is therefore harmless." "Nothing could be further from the truth. Injected heavy metals stay in the places in the body you would expect, but they're horrifying. It's in the kidneys, the liver, the heart, the lymph nodes, the bone marrow & the brain." "The study was terrible to begin with & even with that, the results were horrifying & even with that, then the FDA & CDC declared this must be safe & effective." "It's beyond Kafkaesque in its absurdity because the science is so terribly bad that anybody who reads that study would not want to inject their children with Aluminum Adjuvanted vaccines. And that's just one ingredient amongst hundreds in these vaccines." 👇Aluminum Toxicokinetics Study 👇 👇214 Vaccine Harm Research Studies👇 Video: Toby Rogers Bret Weinstein The DarkHorse Podcast
2:39

"The FDA & CDC Approved Aluminum As 'Safe & Effective' In Vaccines, Based On A Study Of Only 4 Rabbits." Dr Toby Rogers, PhD "Every Single Shot On The CDC's Childhood Schedule, According To The Best Vaccine Data Set In The World, Causes More Harm Than Benefit." "Aluminum Adjuvants are in more than half of today's vaccines. In the 1990s, protests prompted the FDA & CDC to replace some of the Mercury Adjuvants & began using Aluminum Adjuvants." "As They're taking some Mercury out, they're adding more Aluminum back in." "I actually believe they did that to keep the Autism rates rising, so that they wouldn't be blamed for rising Autism cases in the early 2000s." "The Aluminum safety study used to allow Aluminum into vaccines in the U.S. was based on a study of 4 New Zealand white rabbits." "Anyone who's taken statistics knows that you cannot get statistical significance unless you have a sample size of at least 30." "This is the study the FDA & CDC rely on. In this study, they promptly lost the results from one of the rabbits. So we're down to just 3 rabbits. The results in the rabbits were horrifying." "The rabbits are killed after 28 days & the Aluminum Adjuvants are still there. At the endpoint, Aluminum retention in the body & organs was 94% for Aluminum Hydroxide & 78% for Aluminum Phosphate." "The theory & narrative told by the FDA & CDC has always been that the body excretes the Aluminum thru the urine & is therefore harmless." "Nothing could be further from the truth. Injected heavy metals stay in the places in the body you would expect, but they're horrifying. It's in the kidneys, the liver, the heart, the lymph nodes, the bone marrow & the brain." "The study was terrible to begin with & even with that, the results were horrifying & even with that, then the FDA & CDC declared this must be safe & effective." "It's beyond Kafkaesque in its absurdity because the science is so terribly bad that anybody who reads that study would not want to inject their children with Aluminum Adjuvanted vaccines. And that's just one ingredient amongst hundreds in these vaccines." 👇Aluminum Toxicokinetics Study 👇 👇214 Vaccine Harm Research Studies👇 Video: Toby Rogers Bret Weinstein The DarkHorse Podcast

Valerie Anne Smith

117,903 views • 1 year ago

I caught influencer doctor, Dr. Rubin, lying to the public. Shocker. First lie: Jim O’Neill wasn’t confirmed by the senate. The Truth: He was confirmed on 6/5/2025 by the senate. Second lie: Every vaccine has been tested in randomized placebo controlled trials. The Truth: No, they haven’t. Dr. Rubin even explains this in his video. They are often tested against other vaccines because it would be “unethical” to not give a child a vaccine. A true placebo would be a saline solution. What these “experts” need to ask themselves is why is it ethical to vaccinate an entire population without knowing the full safety profiles of these products? I learned how important placebo trials are in seventh grade. Do they not teach that anymore?
2:34

I caught influencer doctor, Dr. Rubin, lying to the public. Shocker. First lie: Jim O’Neill wasn’t confirmed by the senate. The Truth: He was confirmed on 6/5/2025 by the senate. Second lie: Every vaccine has been tested in randomized placebo controlled trials. The Truth: No, they haven’t. Dr. Rubin even explains this in his video. They are often tested against other vaccines because it would be “unethical” to not give a child a vaccine. A true placebo would be a saline solution. What these “experts” need to ask themselves is why is it ethical to vaccinate an entire population without knowing the full safety profiles of these products? I learned how important placebo trials are in seventh grade. Do they not teach that anymore?

Anna Matson

17,906 views • 8 months ago

The Unsettling Truth: Not One Childhood Vaccine Was Tested Against a True Placebo In a Senate hearing, attorney Aaron Siri was asked by Sen. Ron Johnson to clarify the research behind childhood vaccines. His answer was staggering. Siri submitted a 66-page document to the Senate citing FDA clinical trial data. His finding? NOT A SINGLE routine childhood vaccine on the current CDC schedule was licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial where the control group received an inert saline placebo. The "control" groups were given another vaccine—which itself was not tested against a true placebo. This circular referencing means the entire schedule lacks a foundational gold-standard safety benchmark. Why does this matter? Because we are in the midst of a silent pandemic. A pandemic of chronic disease. Since the early 1980s, chronic illness in American children has skyrocketed from under 13% to over 50%. Most of these diseases—asthma, allergies, autoimmune disorders—are forms of immune system dysregulation. What has changed in that same timeframe? The childhood vaccine schedule. In 1986, when vaccine manufacturers were granted legal immunity, the schedule was 3 injections. Today, a child following the full CDC schedule receives 29 injections by their first birthday, including in utero. Every one of those vaccines was licensed by a company that knew it would not be liable for any injuries. In the face of a catastrophic rise in childhood chronic illness, is it not the most basic duty of public health to honestly and transparently investigate all environmental insults, including the exponential increase in vaccines? This isn't anti-vax. It's pro-science. It's a demand for the rigorous safety science our children deserve.
3:03

The Unsettling Truth: Not One Childhood Vaccine Was Tested Against a True Placebo In a Senate hearing, attorney Aaron Siri was asked by Sen. Ron Johnson to clarify the research behind childhood vaccines. His answer was staggering. Siri submitted a 66-page document to the Senate citing FDA clinical trial data. His finding? NOT A SINGLE routine childhood vaccine on the current CDC schedule was licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial where the control group received an inert saline placebo. The "control" groups were given another vaccine—which itself was not tested against a true placebo. This circular referencing means the entire schedule lacks a foundational gold-standard safety benchmark. Why does this matter? Because we are in the midst of a silent pandemic. A pandemic of chronic disease. Since the early 1980s, chronic illness in American children has skyrocketed from under 13% to over 50%. Most of these diseases—asthma, allergies, autoimmune disorders—are forms of immune system dysregulation. What has changed in that same timeframe? The childhood vaccine schedule. In 1986, when vaccine manufacturers were granted legal immunity, the schedule was 3 injections. Today, a child following the full CDC schedule receives 29 injections by their first birthday, including in utero. Every one of those vaccines was licensed by a company that knew it would not be liable for any injuries. In the face of a catastrophic rise in childhood chronic illness, is it not the most basic duty of public health to honestly and transparently investigate all environmental insults, including the exponential increase in vaccines? This isn't anti-vax. It's pro-science. It's a demand for the rigorous safety science our children deserve.

Camus

96,137 views • 1 year ago

"It Is A Myth That Vaccines Are Safe & Necessary...If I Had My Young Children Today, They Would Not Get A Single Vaccine." Dr Pierre Kory, MD "SIDS Occurs At 2, 4 & 6 Months Of Age...Right After Vaccination." "The Gov't Refuses To Do A True Placebo Safety Trial On Any Vaccine." Vaccines have not gone thru a long robust safety trial to prove they are 'safe & effective.' All other pharmaceuticals are safety trialed for 2-6yrs before approval by the CDC & FDA, but vaccines are not safety monitored this way. Hep-B Vaccine: Tested on only 147 infants & children, then monitored for 5 days & granted CDC approval. Hep-A Vaccine: Subjects were monitored for safety, 14 days. Meningitis Vaccine: Local & systemic adverse reactions were monitored for 7 days. Prevnar Pneumonia Vaccine: Study volunteers were monitored for 7 days. MMR Vaccine: Subjects were followed for 42 days. RSV Vaccine: Participants were monitored for 30 days. DTaP & TDaP Vaccines: Subjects were monitored for 14 days. Gardasil HPV Vaccine: Trial participants were surveilled for 14 days. Vaccines have not been safety trialed against a saline placebo. They have all used Aluminum adjuvant or another vaccine as the placebo in clinical trials. Gardasil HPV Clinical Trial: placebo was the Hep-A Vaccine & Aluminum Adjuvant. Hepatitis A Clinical Trial: placebo was the Hep-B Vaccine. Influenza A Clinical Trial: placebo was the Influenza B Vaccine. Meningitis Vaccine Clinical Trial: placebo was the DTaP Vaccine. Pertussis Vaccine Clinical Trial: placebo was the Tetanus & Diphtheria Vaccine. Polio Vaccine Clinical Trial: placebo was Diluted Polio Vaccine. Vaxelis 6 in 1 Vaccine Trial: placebo was the DTaP, Polio, HIB & Hep-B Vaccines. Hepatitis B Clinical Trial: placebo was Aluminum Adjuvant. The countries that have the most infant vaccines on their childhood schedules, have the highest infant mortality. The United States is #1 in infant vaccines & #1 in infant mortality, of all industrialized nations. 97% of infants who die of SIDS, do so within 7 days being vaccinated. 👇Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated Study👇 👇Vaccine Induced Neurodevelopment Disorders👇 👇Health Outcomes: Vaxxed Versus UnVaxxed👇 Speaker: Dr Pierre Kory, MD Video: @that_barefootgirlv
2:03

"It Is A Myth That Vaccines Are Safe & Necessary...If I Had My Young Children Today, They Would Not Get A Single Vaccine." Dr Pierre Kory, MD "SIDS Occurs At 2, 4 & 6 Months Of Age...Right After Vaccination." "The Gov't Refuses To Do A True Placebo Safety Trial On Any Vaccine." Vaccines have not gone thru a long robust safety trial to prove they are 'safe & effective.' All other pharmaceuticals are safety trialed for 2-6yrs before approval by the CDC & FDA, but vaccines are not safety monitored this way. Hep-B Vaccine: Tested on only 147 infants & children, then monitored for 5 days & granted CDC approval. Hep-A Vaccine: Subjects were monitored for safety, 14 days. Meningitis Vaccine: Local & systemic adverse reactions were monitored for 7 days. Prevnar Pneumonia Vaccine: Study volunteers were monitored for 7 days. MMR Vaccine: Subjects were followed for 42 days. RSV Vaccine: Participants were monitored for 30 days. DTaP & TDaP Vaccines: Subjects were monitored for 14 days. Gardasil HPV Vaccine: Trial participants were surveilled for 14 days. Vaccines have not been safety trialed against a saline placebo. They have all used Aluminum adjuvant or another vaccine as the placebo in clinical trials. Gardasil HPV Clinical Trial: placebo was the Hep-A Vaccine & Aluminum Adjuvant. Hepatitis A Clinical Trial: placebo was the Hep-B Vaccine. Influenza A Clinical Trial: placebo was the Influenza B Vaccine. Meningitis Vaccine Clinical Trial: placebo was the DTaP Vaccine. Pertussis Vaccine Clinical Trial: placebo was the Tetanus & Diphtheria Vaccine. Polio Vaccine Clinical Trial: placebo was Diluted Polio Vaccine. Vaxelis 6 in 1 Vaccine Trial: placebo was the DTaP, Polio, HIB & Hep-B Vaccines. Hepatitis B Clinical Trial: placebo was Aluminum Adjuvant. The countries that have the most infant vaccines on their childhood schedules, have the highest infant mortality. The United States is #1 in infant vaccines & #1 in infant mortality, of all industrialized nations. 97% of infants who die of SIDS, do so within 7 days being vaccinated. 👇Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated Study👇 👇Vaccine Induced Neurodevelopment Disorders👇 👇Health Outcomes: Vaxxed Versus UnVaxxed👇 Speaker: Dr Pierre Kory, MD Video: @that_barefootgirlv

Valerie Anne Smith

262,818 views • 1 year ago

Had another interview with a reporter the other day and they asked me about the studies the government has done on the shots collectively given to infants in the first year of life, and whether they used a proper control group of children who didn't receive those shots. These studies are such a joke. What they end up doing with MMR, for instance, is saying they took children who got all the vaccines except MMR, then all the vaccines plus MMR, and didn't see a statistically significant uptick in autism, and therefore MMR doesn't cause autism. And that study is fine, if all the other vaccines have already been proven not to cause autism. Then you have a proper control group. But the Institute of Medicine states clearly there is no study that isolates the DTaP vaccine. And the CDC has suspected DTaP since the 1986 Act, which literally listed diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis as being associated with autism and as the first thing that should be investigated once they took on the liability. That investigation has never happened. I think we should ask ourselves why. Because if DTaP causes autism, it erases the validity of the MMR study entirely. Your control group had a product in it that can cause autism. That is the problem with the science that has been done so far. I have had both Dr. Stanley Plotkin and Kathryn Edwards on the stand in front of Aaron Siri, two of the most iconic figures in the vaccine space. When asked, listing every vaccine one by one, "Do you have a study showing it doesn't cause autism?" Kathryn Edwards had none. Stanley Plotkin stated the same thing under oath. What they both explained is that they made an assumption that vaccines don't cause autism. I have that on video on my website. These are the authors of Plotkin's Vaccines, considered the bible on vaccinations. So if your top vaccine scientists cannot provide a single study under oath, why are newspapers reporting there are mountains of evidence? I sued the CDC. I said show me the trials you relied upon for the first six vaccines in the first six months of life to conclude they don't cause autism. They had zero. Not for Hepatitis B. Not for polio. Not for DTaP. Zero. There is no two or three year placebo trial for these products like you would see with every other drug. And that is not an accident. Causation is established in a placebo trial. If you skip that trial, you remove your ability to ever get to causation. You are permanently stuck in the land of "associated with." And the agency that is required to do the safety studies is the same agency defending itself in court against me. They are not doing the science, so you cannot win. That is where we are.
4:12

Had another interview with a reporter the other day and they asked me about the studies the government has done on the shots collectively given to infants in the first year of life, and whether they used a proper control group of children who didn't receive those shots. These studies are such a joke. What they end up doing with MMR, for instance, is saying they took children who got all the vaccines except MMR, then all the vaccines plus MMR, and didn't see a statistically significant uptick in autism, and therefore MMR doesn't cause autism. And that study is fine, if all the other vaccines have already been proven not to cause autism. Then you have a proper control group. But the Institute of Medicine states clearly there is no study that isolates the DTaP vaccine. And the CDC has suspected DTaP since the 1986 Act, which literally listed diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis as being associated with autism and as the first thing that should be investigated once they took on the liability. That investigation has never happened. I think we should ask ourselves why. Because if DTaP causes autism, it erases the validity of the MMR study entirely. Your control group had a product in it that can cause autism. That is the problem with the science that has been done so far. I have had both Dr. Stanley Plotkin and Kathryn Edwards on the stand in front of Aaron Siri, two of the most iconic figures in the vaccine space. When asked, listing every vaccine one by one, "Do you have a study showing it doesn't cause autism?" Kathryn Edwards had none. Stanley Plotkin stated the same thing under oath. What they both explained is that they made an assumption that vaccines don't cause autism. I have that on video on my website. These are the authors of Plotkin's Vaccines, considered the bible on vaccinations. So if your top vaccine scientists cannot provide a single study under oath, why are newspapers reporting there are mountains of evidence? I sued the CDC. I said show me the trials you relied upon for the first six vaccines in the first six months of life to conclude they don't cause autism. They had zero. Not for Hepatitis B. Not for polio. Not for DTaP. Zero. There is no two or three year placebo trial for these products like you would see with every other drug. And that is not an accident. Causation is established in a placebo trial. If you skip that trial, you remove your ability to ever get to causation. You are permanently stuck in the land of "associated with." And the agency that is required to do the safety studies is the same agency defending itself in court against me. They are not doing the science, so you cannot win. That is where we are.

Del Bigtree

30,011 views • 5 months ago

Jenny McCarthy claims that when she investigated her son Evan's body, he was "filled with heavy metals," and that there is "tons of aluminum" in shots, with mercury still present in some of them. Alex Clark notes that mercury was removed from the flu shot. McCarthy responds that aluminum "does just as bad damage," and that these ingredients are "still in there" and "still causing damage" because "they never did the proper safety testing." McCarthy further claims that the CDC previously said there was no correlation between vaccines and autism, but that "now they had to eat their own words", claiming the CDC now admits "we never did the research to prove that." She also claims that childhood vaccines were never tested against a true saline placebo, only against other aluminum-containing vaccines, because giving children a placebo was deemed "not ethical." In her words: "We never got a true study." Regardless of where you stand on the vaccine debate, rigorous safety testing is a must - we're giving these vaccines to healthy babies and children. Not to mention, the fastest way to shut "anti-vaxxers down" is to do the safety studies and prove vaccines are safe. In this case, it's better to do more tests than less.
1:37

Jenny McCarthy claims that when she investigated her son Evan's body, he was "filled with heavy metals," and that there is "tons of aluminum" in shots, with mercury still present in some of them. Alex Clark notes that mercury was removed from the flu shot. McCarthy responds that aluminum "does just as bad damage," and that these ingredients are "still in there" and "still causing damage" because "they never did the proper safety testing." McCarthy further claims that the CDC previously said there was no correlation between vaccines and autism, but that "now they had to eat their own words", claiming the CDC now admits "we never did the research to prove that." She also claims that childhood vaccines were never tested against a true saline placebo, only against other aluminum-containing vaccines, because giving children a placebo was deemed "not ethical." In her words: "We never got a true study." Regardless of where you stand on the vaccine debate, rigorous safety testing is a must - we're giving these vaccines to healthy babies and children. Not to mention, the fastest way to shut "anti-vaxxers down" is to do the safety studies and prove vaccines are safe. In this case, it's better to do more tests than less.

Camus

157,263 views • 3 days ago

“Unless you're comparing a vaccine against saline, how can you say it’s safe?” Dr. Sherri Tenpenny just exposed Pharma’s “safe and effective” narrative as a complete sham. “There has never been—on any one of the vaccines that are currently given—a truly placebo-controlled trial where in one set of children they were given the new vaccine, and then the other set of children it was a true saline placebo.” “All of the vaccine trials are a vaccine compared to another vaccine,” Alex Clark: “How long were the majority of the safety trials done on the vaccines on the childhood schedule?” Dr. Tenpenny: “The average length of time is probably somewhere between 15 and 30 days.” “It’s been as short as 4 days.” “When they brought the first hepatitis B vaccine to market, they followed to see if there were any side effects for 5 days.” “The second hepatitis B vaccine that came to market, they followed side effects for 4 days.” “That is not a safety trial.” “It can take months to years to develop autoimmune diseases, neurological complications, other types of things like [gastrointestinal] disorders.” “Encephalitis can start right away, but it can be slow brewing for a long period of time.” Dr Sherri Tenpenny
2:37

“Unless you're comparing a vaccine against saline, how can you say it’s safe?” Dr. Sherri Tenpenny just exposed Pharma’s “safe and effective” narrative as a complete sham. “There has never been—on any one of the vaccines that are currently given—a truly placebo-controlled trial where in one set of children they were given the new vaccine, and then the other set of children it was a true saline placebo.” “All of the vaccine trials are a vaccine compared to another vaccine,” Alex Clark: “How long were the majority of the safety trials done on the vaccines on the childhood schedule?” Dr. Tenpenny: “The average length of time is probably somewhere between 15 and 30 days.” “It’s been as short as 4 days.” “When they brought the first hepatitis B vaccine to market, they followed to see if there were any side effects for 5 days.” “The second hepatitis B vaccine that came to market, they followed side effects for 4 days.” “That is not a safety trial.” “It can take months to years to develop autoimmune diseases, neurological complications, other types of things like [gastrointestinal] disorders.” “Encephalitis can start right away, but it can be slow brewing for a long period of time.” Dr Sherri Tenpenny

Children’s Health Defense

49,833 views • 9 months ago