Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The foundational science we're told to "trust" is built on a semantic shell game. A deep dive into vaccine trial methodology reveals a disturbing pattern of linguistic trickery that protects a status quo at the expense of public health. As researcher Toby Rogers points out, the core of the...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

452,549 subscribers

143,760 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнесНаука и технологииНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The Unethical Circle of Vaccine Science, Exposed by Its Own Architects. A stunning admission is playing out in plain sight. Former FDA Chief and Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb is making his second media tour, laser-focused on one thing: stopping RFK Jr. from linking the aluminum adjuvant in vaccines to autism. Why such intense, specific concern from a man at the very heart of the pharmaceutical industry? The reason reveals an unforgivable flaw at the foundation of modern vaccine science. As highlighted in recent hearings, there has never been a placebo-controlled safety study on injected aluminum adjuvants. You will not find a study where one group gets aluminum and another gets saline. The official reason? It would be "unethical." Think about that. It's "unethical" to test the safety of a substance they have been injecting into billions of people, including children, for decades. Why is it unethical? Because aluminum is not a vitamin. It's a neurotoxicant with no beneficial role in the human body. Injecting it purely for a safety trial would offer the subject no benefit, only potential harm. Therefore, it's illegal. So let's state this clearly: 1. They admit it's unethical to inject aluminum to study its harm. 2. Yet, they have no ethical problem making it a "core ingredient" in almost every childhood vaccine. This is the indefensible circle: They never did the safety trial to establish a baseline of harm. They can't do it now because it would be unethical. But they continue to mandate the product. And Gottlieb’s own quote says it all: "If you take out aluminum, you'll destroy the whole vaccine program." That is the entire problem in one sentence. The program depends on an ingredient whose standalone safety has never been—and can ethically never be—established. This isn't conspiracy. This is the admission of a former FDA chief. The conversation has moved from "safe and effective" to "too big to fail." Where is the transparent science?
2:04

The Unethical Circle of Vaccine Science, Exposed by Its Own Architects. A stunning admission is playing out in plain sight. Former FDA Chief and Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb is making his second media tour, laser-focused on one thing: stopping RFK Jr. from linking the aluminum adjuvant in vaccines to autism. Why such intense, specific concern from a man at the very heart of the pharmaceutical industry? The reason reveals an unforgivable flaw at the foundation of modern vaccine science. As highlighted in recent hearings, there has never been a placebo-controlled safety study on injected aluminum adjuvants. You will not find a study where one group gets aluminum and another gets saline. The official reason? It would be "unethical." Think about that. It's "unethical" to test the safety of a substance they have been injecting into billions of people, including children, for decades. Why is it unethical? Because aluminum is not a vitamin. It's a neurotoxicant with no beneficial role in the human body. Injecting it purely for a safety trial would offer the subject no benefit, only potential harm. Therefore, it's illegal. So let's state this clearly: 1. They admit it's unethical to inject aluminum to study its harm. 2. Yet, they have no ethical problem making it a "core ingredient" in almost every childhood vaccine. This is the indefensible circle: They never did the safety trial to establish a baseline of harm. They can't do it now because it would be unethical. But they continue to mandate the product. And Gottlieb’s own quote says it all: "If you take out aluminum, you'll destroy the whole vaccine program." That is the entire problem in one sentence. The program depends on an ingredient whose standalone safety has never been—and can ethically never be—established. This isn't conspiracy. This is the admission of a former FDA chief. The conversation has moved from "safe and effective" to "too big to fail." Where is the transparent science?

Camus

33,188 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Dr Fauci Admits, "We Don't Do True Placebo Trials On Vaccines." Del Bigtree, CEO, I.C.A.N. 'True Placebo' Is Saline As The Comparative In A Vaccine Control Trial. That's Not What The Gov't Uses. Shocking List Of 'Placebos' Used In Vaccine Clinical Trials. FDA, WHO & CDC Approved Vaccine Trial "Placebo": Thimerosal Mercury & Aluminum Oxide Other Already Approved Vaccines Clinical Trial Vaccines & What Placebo Was Used: HPV Gardasil Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Aluminum Adjuvant & Hep-A Vaccine. Hepatitis A Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Hep-B Vaccine. Influenza A Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Influenza B Vaccine. Meningitis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was DTaP Vaccine. Pertussis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diphtheria & Tetanus Vaccine Prevnar-13 Pneumonia Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Prevnar-7 Vaccine. Hepatitis A Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Aluminum Adjuvant. Prevnar-9 Pneumonia Clinical Trial...Placebo Was DTP-Hib Vaccine. Cholera Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was K-12 E.Coli Vaccine. Prevnar-23 Pneumonia Vaccine...Placebo Was Hep A & Hep-B Vaccine. Polio Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Polio Vaccine. Chicken Pox Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Chicken Pox Vaccine. Shingles Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Shingles Vaccine. Some COVID-19 Vaccine Clinical Trials...Placebo Was Meningitis Vaccine. The Government believes, "Testing a new vaccine against a saline injection is considered unethical." The Government believes, "Depriving half of the trial participants of an older vaccine(which is approved to use as placebo) & giving them a true saline placebo instead would not be fair: it would actually be unethical." The Government believes, "Saline injections don’t cause a sore arm, which might unwittingly reveal to the 'double blind volunteers' that they are in the placebo group. Those who get the experimental vaccine & those who get placebo must be kept secret." This is the most flagrant violation of human rights. causing harm to both children & adults. Crimes against humanity with no informed consent & no true placebo skews all results & makes all vaccines appear "safe & effective" because the adverse events & side effects in both groups are similar. 👇Pediatric Vaccine Clinical Trial Placebos👇 👇Vaccine Trial Placebo Development👇 Speaker: Del Bigtree ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network @MAHAalliance
1:42

Dr Fauci Admits, "We Don't Do True Placebo Trials On Vaccines." Del Bigtree, CEO, I.C.A.N. 'True Placebo' Is Saline As The Comparative In A Vaccine Control Trial. That's Not What The Gov't Uses. Shocking List Of 'Placebos' Used In Vaccine Clinical Trials. FDA, WHO & CDC Approved Vaccine Trial "Placebo": Thimerosal Mercury & Aluminum Oxide Other Already Approved Vaccines Clinical Trial Vaccines & What Placebo Was Used: HPV Gardasil Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Aluminum Adjuvant & Hep-A Vaccine. Hepatitis A Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Hep-B Vaccine. Influenza A Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Influenza B Vaccine. Meningitis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was DTaP Vaccine. Pertussis Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diphtheria & Tetanus Vaccine Prevnar-13 Pneumonia Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Prevnar-7 Vaccine. Hepatitis A Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Aluminum Adjuvant. Prevnar-9 Pneumonia Clinical Trial...Placebo Was DTP-Hib Vaccine. Cholera Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was K-12 E.Coli Vaccine. Prevnar-23 Pneumonia Vaccine...Placebo Was Hep A & Hep-B Vaccine. Polio Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Polio Vaccine. Chicken Pox Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Chicken Pox Vaccine. Shingles Vaccine Clinical Trial...Placebo Was Diluted Shingles Vaccine. Some COVID-19 Vaccine Clinical Trials...Placebo Was Meningitis Vaccine. The Government believes, "Testing a new vaccine against a saline injection is considered unethical." The Government believes, "Depriving half of the trial participants of an older vaccine(which is approved to use as placebo) & giving them a true saline placebo instead would not be fair: it would actually be unethical." The Government believes, "Saline injections don’t cause a sore arm, which might unwittingly reveal to the 'double blind volunteers' that they are in the placebo group. Those who get the experimental vaccine & those who get placebo must be kept secret." This is the most flagrant violation of human rights. causing harm to both children & adults. Crimes against humanity with no informed consent & no true placebo skews all results & makes all vaccines appear "safe & effective" because the adverse events & side effects in both groups are similar. 👇Pediatric Vaccine Clinical Trial Placebos👇 👇Vaccine Trial Placebo Development👇 Speaker: Del Bigtree ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network @MAHAalliance

Valerie Anne Smith

1,082,365 просмотров • 1 год назад

There are no double-blind, placebo-based randomized controlled trials for the safety of childhood vaccines. They don't exist because the people responsible for them decided not to do them. I know this because in 2017 Robert F. Kennedy Jr and I sat down at the NIH with Francis Collins and Tony Fauci and asked them. We said, we can't find a single placebo-based safety trial for any vaccine on the childhood schedule. Are you doing them, or are we just not seeing them? They told us they don't do those trials because they believe it is unethical to withhold what they consider a beneficial product from a control group. That is the logic. The faith that the product is so valuable that studying it rigorously would be unfair to the people in the trial not getting it. So they never study it. Every vaccine given to every child in America rests on an assumption of safety and nothing more. Marcello Foa
2:32

There are no double-blind, placebo-based randomized controlled trials for the safety of childhood vaccines. They don't exist because the people responsible for them decided not to do them. I know this because in 2017 Robert F. Kennedy Jr and I sat down at the NIH with Francis Collins and Tony Fauci and asked them. We said, we can't find a single placebo-based safety trial for any vaccine on the childhood schedule. Are you doing them, or are we just not seeing them? They told us they don't do those trials because they believe it is unethical to withhold what they consider a beneficial product from a control group. That is the logic. The faith that the product is so valuable that studying it rigorously would be unfair to the people in the trial not getting it. So they never study it. Every vaccine given to every child in America rests on an assumption of safety and nothing more. Marcello Foa

Del Bigtree

117,444 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This isn't a debate. This is a confession. Australian Senator Alex Antic just asked a regulator a simple question: How many gold-standard, placebo-controlled trials are behind the childhood vaccine schedule? The answer will leave you speechless. They admitted they can't provide a number. The justification? It's "ethically questionable" to test vaccines against a true placebo once a treatment is "established." Let's be clear: They are injecting millions of our children with products that have never been tested against an inert saline placebo in long-term trials. Their defense is that the science is "contextual" and the "real-world" evidence is enough. But without that gold-standard comparison, how can we ever truly know the long-term safety profile? How can we quantify the risk vs. benefit without the most basic scientific benchmark? They've replaced the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine—the placebo-controlled trial—with an appeal to authority and decades of "we just know it works." This is a staggering admission that the entire foundation of childhood vaccination relies on a different, lower standard of proof than what is demanded for every other medicine. This isn't conspiracy. This is what they said, under oath. Demand better science.
2:23

This isn't a debate. This is a confession. Australian Senator Alex Antic just asked a regulator a simple question: How many gold-standard, placebo-controlled trials are behind the childhood vaccine schedule? The answer will leave you speechless. They admitted they can't provide a number. The justification? It's "ethically questionable" to test vaccines against a true placebo once a treatment is "established." Let's be clear: They are injecting millions of our children with products that have never been tested against an inert saline placebo in long-term trials. Their defense is that the science is "contextual" and the "real-world" evidence is enough. But without that gold-standard comparison, how can we ever truly know the long-term safety profile? How can we quantify the risk vs. benefit without the most basic scientific benchmark? They've replaced the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine—the placebo-controlled trial—with an appeal to authority and decades of "we just know it works." This is a staggering admission that the entire foundation of childhood vaccination relies on a different, lower standard of proof than what is demanded for every other medicine. This isn't conspiracy. This is what they said, under oath. Demand better science.

Camus

223,624 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Big Pharma made a monumental error in their HPV (Gardasil) vaccine trial when they included a proper saline group. This part of an eye opening deposition, shows how adjuvants and vaccines compare to REAL saline/placebo. They try to infer that even inert substances will cause the same rate of adverse events as vaccines and injected adjuvants. But this trial exposes the truth. Dr. Stanley Plotkin exposed by Aaron Siri. After first laying the ground work and getting Dr. Plotkin to answer YES to that systemic belief that adverse events are an "Always on" mechanism built into all clinical trials, Aaron Siri presents him with a paper containing the evidence, with a Gardasil vaccine that had 3 groups, Vaccine, Aluminum Adjuvant and Saline. The Aluminum Adjuvant arm and the vaccine arm had well over 2% auto-immune adverse events. The Saline/Inert group had a 0% Which means - "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction" - NEWTON. When presented with the evidence, watch Dr. Plotkin continue along his path of cognitive dissonance.
3:59

Big Pharma made a monumental error in their HPV (Gardasil) vaccine trial when they included a proper saline group. This part of an eye opening deposition, shows how adjuvants and vaccines compare to REAL saline/placebo. They try to infer that even inert substances will cause the same rate of adverse events as vaccines and injected adjuvants. But this trial exposes the truth. Dr. Stanley Plotkin exposed by Aaron Siri. After first laying the ground work and getting Dr. Plotkin to answer YES to that systemic belief that adverse events are an "Always on" mechanism built into all clinical trials, Aaron Siri presents him with a paper containing the evidence, with a Gardasil vaccine that had 3 groups, Vaccine, Aluminum Adjuvant and Saline. The Aluminum Adjuvant arm and the vaccine arm had well over 2% auto-immune adverse events. The Saline/Inert group had a 0% Which means - "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction" - NEWTON. When presented with the evidence, watch Dr. Plotkin continue along his path of cognitive dissonance.

Humanspective

67,860 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The foundational narrative of vaccine safety is crumbling under the weight of a single, inconvenient question: "Where are the placebo-controlled trials?" A recent Australian Senate hearing exposed the shocking truth that the public health establishment has worked tirelessly to conceal. When asked how many placebo-controlled studies support the childhood vaccine schedule, regulators were left stammering, unable to provide a single example. Their defense? A convoluted, ethically-based excuse: once a vaccine is on the market, it is considered "unethical" to test new ones against a true saline placebo. Why? Because you would be "denying" children an "established" effective product. But this is a circular logic trap of the highest order. As revealed in the powerful new documentary An Inconvenient Study, this creates a perpetual "bait-and-switch." New vaccines are only tested against older vaccines, which themselves were never tested against a true placebo. The entire schedule is built upon a house of cards, with each new product leaning on the safety assumption of a prior, equally un-validated one. The film brilliantly illustrates this with the "Whiskey Study" analogy: - To test if whiskey causes car accidents, the gold standard is a trial against water. - The vaccine industry's method? Test whiskey against vodka, and when both groups crash, declare whiskey "safe" because it was no worse than vodka. They have never done the water test. This is the "gold standard" that isn't. This is the "mountain of science" with a gaping, placebo-shaped hole at its core. For decades, the public has been told a story of absolute safety and rigorous testing. Now, as officials struggle to answer basic scientific questions, that story is being exposed as a carefully constructed myth. The questions are finally being asked. The answers, or the stunning lack thereof, are changing everything.
9:50

The foundational narrative of vaccine safety is crumbling under the weight of a single, inconvenient question: "Where are the placebo-controlled trials?" A recent Australian Senate hearing exposed the shocking truth that the public health establishment has worked tirelessly to conceal. When asked how many placebo-controlled studies support the childhood vaccine schedule, regulators were left stammering, unable to provide a single example. Their defense? A convoluted, ethically-based excuse: once a vaccine is on the market, it is considered "unethical" to test new ones against a true saline placebo. Why? Because you would be "denying" children an "established" effective product. But this is a circular logic trap of the highest order. As revealed in the powerful new documentary An Inconvenient Study, this creates a perpetual "bait-and-switch." New vaccines are only tested against older vaccines, which themselves were never tested against a true placebo. The entire schedule is built upon a house of cards, with each new product leaning on the safety assumption of a prior, equally un-validated one. The film brilliantly illustrates this with the "Whiskey Study" analogy: - To test if whiskey causes car accidents, the gold standard is a trial against water. - The vaccine industry's method? Test whiskey against vodka, and when both groups crash, declare whiskey "safe" because it was no worse than vodka. They have never done the water test. This is the "gold standard" that isn't. This is the "mountain of science" with a gaping, placebo-shaped hole at its core. For decades, the public has been told a story of absolute safety and rigorous testing. Now, as officials struggle to answer basic scientific questions, that story is being exposed as a carefully constructed myth. The questions are finally being asked. The answers, or the stunning lack thereof, are changing everything.

Camus

14,485 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨 Debunking Grok: Did you know the "gold standard" placebo-controlled trial for Merck's Varivax chickenpox vaccine wasn't a real placebo at all? The package insert calls it a "placebo,” but digging into the actual study documents (linked on the FDA site) reveals that the control group received an injection with ~45mg/mL of neomycin, a potent antibiotic that can cause severe reactions even when applied topically, let alone when injected intramuscularly. Only 956 kids total (465 "placebo") were monitored just weeks for safety. That is too short to detect rare events, and they rigged the control to hide reactions by not using a true placebo and instead using an antibiotic. This is how they "prove" safety. True inert saline placebo? Never done. Full clip from Del Bigtree & Aaron Siri breaking it down 👇 What do YOU think? Is this real science? ⬇️
1:19

🚨 Debunking Grok: Did you know the "gold standard" placebo-controlled trial for Merck's Varivax chickenpox vaccine wasn't a real placebo at all? The package insert calls it a "placebo,” but digging into the actual study documents (linked on the FDA site) reveals that the control group received an injection with ~45mg/mL of neomycin, a potent antibiotic that can cause severe reactions even when applied topically, let alone when injected intramuscularly. Only 956 kids total (465 "placebo") were monitored just weeks for safety. That is too short to detect rare events, and they rigged the control to hide reactions by not using a true placebo and instead using an antibiotic. This is how they "prove" safety. True inert saline placebo? Never done. Full clip from Del Bigtree & Aaron Siri breaking it down 👇 What do YOU think? Is this real science? ⬇️

The HighWire

14,363 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Of the 661 studies often cited as proof that childhood vaccines are tested against inert placebos, a detailed breakdown reveals a shocking truth: not a single one was used to license a routine injected vaccine on the CDC schedule with a true saline placebo. Here’s the breakdown by Aaron Siri: ➡️ 567 studies were for non-routine vaccines (e.g., HIV vaccines). Irrelevant. ➡️ Of the remaining 94, 70 did not involve healthy children (e.g., HIV+ adults). Irrelevant. ➡️ Of the remaining 24, 21 did not involve a US-licensed vaccine or a control used to license one. Irrelevant. That leaves just 3 studies. But do they hold up? 1. Varicella (chickenpox) vaccine: Control group was injected with neomycin (an antibiotic), NOT an inert placebo. 2. Gardasil-4: The “inert” control group received everything in the vial except antigens and alum—including L-histidine, sodium borate, and yeast protein. NOT inert. 3. Gardasil-9: A small group received saline, BUT only after first receiving three doses of Gardasil-4. Not a true inert control. The result? ZERO trials with a true inert placebo were used to license any routine childhood vaccine. This isn’t just a statistical oversight—it’s a fundamental flaw in how we assess vaccine safety. Proper safety trials require: ✅ A true inert control (e.g., saline) ✅ Long-term safety review ✅ Sufficient power (large sample size) Not a single routine childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule meets all three criteria. When RFK Jr. highlighted this lack of placebo-controlled data, fact-checkers pointed to the same flawed list of 661 studies. After his analysis debunked them, the list was mysteriously expanded—perhaps hoping a larger number would obscure the truth. The truth remains: without proper controls, we cannot robustly quantify the risks of vaccines. Parents and physicians deserve transparent, high-quality data to make informed decisions.
6:09

Of the 661 studies often cited as proof that childhood vaccines are tested against inert placebos, a detailed breakdown reveals a shocking truth: not a single one was used to license a routine injected vaccine on the CDC schedule with a true saline placebo. Here’s the breakdown by Aaron Siri: ➡️ 567 studies were for non-routine vaccines (e.g., HIV vaccines). Irrelevant. ➡️ Of the remaining 94, 70 did not involve healthy children (e.g., HIV+ adults). Irrelevant. ➡️ Of the remaining 24, 21 did not involve a US-licensed vaccine or a control used to license one. Irrelevant. That leaves just 3 studies. But do they hold up? 1. Varicella (chickenpox) vaccine: Control group was injected with neomycin (an antibiotic), NOT an inert placebo. 2. Gardasil-4: The “inert” control group received everything in the vial except antigens and alum—including L-histidine, sodium borate, and yeast protein. NOT inert. 3. Gardasil-9: A small group received saline, BUT only after first receiving three doses of Gardasil-4. Not a true inert control. The result? ZERO trials with a true inert placebo were used to license any routine childhood vaccine. This isn’t just a statistical oversight—it’s a fundamental flaw in how we assess vaccine safety. Proper safety trials require: ✅ A true inert control (e.g., saline) ✅ Long-term safety review ✅ Sufficient power (large sample size) Not a single routine childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule meets all three criteria. When RFK Jr. highlighted this lack of placebo-controlled data, fact-checkers pointed to the same flawed list of 661 studies. After his analysis debunked them, the list was mysteriously expanded—perhaps hoping a larger number would obscure the truth. The truth remains: without proper controls, we cannot robustly quantify the risks of vaccines. Parents and physicians deserve transparent, high-quality data to make informed decisions.

Camus

59,416 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

"The FDA & CDC Approved Aluminum As 'Safe & Effective' In Vaccines, Based On A Study Of Only 4 Rabbits." Dr Toby Rogers, PhD "Every Single Shot On The CDC's Childhood Schedule, According To The Best Vaccine Data Set In The World, Causes More Harm Than Benefit." "Aluminum Adjuvants are in more than half of today's vaccines. In the 1990s, protests prompted the FDA & CDC to replace some of the Mercury Adjuvants & began using Aluminum Adjuvants." "As They're taking some Mercury out, they're adding more Aluminum back in." "I actually believe they did that to keep the Autism rates rising, so that they wouldn't be blamed for rising Autism cases in the early 2000s." "The Aluminum safety study used to allow Aluminum into vaccines in the U.S. was based on a study of 4 New Zealand white rabbits." "Anyone who's taken statistics knows that you cannot get statistical significance unless you have a sample size of at least 30." "This is the study the FDA & CDC rely on. In this study, they promptly lost the results from one of the rabbits. So we're down to just 3 rabbits. The results in the rabbits were horrifying." "The rabbits are killed after 28 days & the Aluminum Adjuvants are still there. At the endpoint, Aluminum retention in the body & organs was 94% for Aluminum Hydroxide & 78% for Aluminum Phosphate." "The theory & narrative told by the FDA & CDC has always been that the body excretes the Aluminum thru the urine & is therefore harmless." "Nothing could be further from the truth. Injected heavy metals stay in the places in the body you would expect, but they're horrifying. It's in the kidneys, the liver, the heart, the lymph nodes, the bone marrow & the brain." "The study was terrible to begin with & even with that, the results were horrifying & even with that, then the FDA & CDC declared this must be safe & effective." "It's beyond Kafkaesque in its absurdity because the science is so terribly bad that anybody who reads that study would not want to inject their children with Aluminum Adjuvanted vaccines. And that's just one ingredient amongst hundreds in these vaccines." 👇Aluminum Toxicokinetics Study 👇 👇214 Vaccine Harm Research Studies👇 Video: Toby Rogers Bret Weinstein The DarkHorse Podcast
2:39

"The FDA & CDC Approved Aluminum As 'Safe & Effective' In Vaccines, Based On A Study Of Only 4 Rabbits." Dr Toby Rogers, PhD "Every Single Shot On The CDC's Childhood Schedule, According To The Best Vaccine Data Set In The World, Causes More Harm Than Benefit." "Aluminum Adjuvants are in more than half of today's vaccines. In the 1990s, protests prompted the FDA & CDC to replace some of the Mercury Adjuvants & began using Aluminum Adjuvants." "As They're taking some Mercury out, they're adding more Aluminum back in." "I actually believe they did that to keep the Autism rates rising, so that they wouldn't be blamed for rising Autism cases in the early 2000s." "The Aluminum safety study used to allow Aluminum into vaccines in the U.S. was based on a study of 4 New Zealand white rabbits." "Anyone who's taken statistics knows that you cannot get statistical significance unless you have a sample size of at least 30." "This is the study the FDA & CDC rely on. In this study, they promptly lost the results from one of the rabbits. So we're down to just 3 rabbits. The results in the rabbits were horrifying." "The rabbits are killed after 28 days & the Aluminum Adjuvants are still there. At the endpoint, Aluminum retention in the body & organs was 94% for Aluminum Hydroxide & 78% for Aluminum Phosphate." "The theory & narrative told by the FDA & CDC has always been that the body excretes the Aluminum thru the urine & is therefore harmless." "Nothing could be further from the truth. Injected heavy metals stay in the places in the body you would expect, but they're horrifying. It's in the kidneys, the liver, the heart, the lymph nodes, the bone marrow & the brain." "The study was terrible to begin with & even with that, the results were horrifying & even with that, then the FDA & CDC declared this must be safe & effective." "It's beyond Kafkaesque in its absurdity because the science is so terribly bad that anybody who reads that study would not want to inject their children with Aluminum Adjuvanted vaccines. And that's just one ingredient amongst hundreds in these vaccines." 👇Aluminum Toxicokinetics Study 👇 👇214 Vaccine Harm Research Studies👇 Video: Toby Rogers Bret Weinstein The DarkHorse Podcast

Valerie Anne Smith

117,903 просмотров • 1 год назад

I caught influencer doctor, Dr. Rubin, lying to the public. Shocker. First lie: Jim O’Neill wasn’t confirmed by the senate. The Truth: He was confirmed on 6/5/2025 by the senate. Second lie: Every vaccine has been tested in randomized placebo controlled trials. The Truth: No, they haven’t. Dr. Rubin even explains this in his video. They are often tested against other vaccines because it would be “unethical” to not give a child a vaccine. A true placebo would be a saline solution. What these “experts” need to ask themselves is why is it ethical to vaccinate an entire population without knowing the full safety profiles of these products? I learned how important placebo trials are in seventh grade. Do they not teach that anymore?
2:34

I caught influencer doctor, Dr. Rubin, lying to the public. Shocker. First lie: Jim O’Neill wasn’t confirmed by the senate. The Truth: He was confirmed on 6/5/2025 by the senate. Second lie: Every vaccine has been tested in randomized placebo controlled trials. The Truth: No, they haven’t. Dr. Rubin even explains this in his video. They are often tested against other vaccines because it would be “unethical” to not give a child a vaccine. A true placebo would be a saline solution. What these “experts” need to ask themselves is why is it ethical to vaccinate an entire population without knowing the full safety profiles of these products? I learned how important placebo trials are in seventh grade. Do they not teach that anymore?

Anna Matson

17,906 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

I don't know where to start with this. GROK is misleading the entire X ecosystem on the truth. The more disturbing part? Big Pharma is injecting healthy control groups with Aluminum and Mercury, but they are calling it "placebo". Aaron Siri walks everyone through the disturbing truth that GROK and Elon Musk should take note of: "The package insert uses the word placebo", but when go to the underlying documentation and look at "what was actually in the control, this one's incredible ... [it included] Aluminum adjuvant [which is Mercks] proprietary aluminium adjuvant that they will not give anybody a sample of to test, because it's 'so safe' ... and Thimerosol".
2:34

I don't know where to start with this. GROK is misleading the entire X ecosystem on the truth. The more disturbing part? Big Pharma is injecting healthy control groups with Aluminum and Mercury, but they are calling it "placebo". Aaron Siri walks everyone through the disturbing truth that GROK and Elon Musk should take note of: "The package insert uses the word placebo", but when go to the underlying documentation and look at "what was actually in the control, this one's incredible ... [it included] Aluminum adjuvant [which is Mercks] proprietary aluminium adjuvant that they will not give anybody a sample of to test, because it's 'so safe' ... and Thimerosol".

Humanspective

25,619 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

The Unsettling Truth: Not One Childhood Vaccine Was Tested Against a True Placebo In a Senate hearing, attorney Aaron Siri was asked by Sen. Ron Johnson to clarify the research behind childhood vaccines. His answer was staggering. Siri submitted a 66-page document to the Senate citing FDA clinical trial data. His finding? NOT A SINGLE routine childhood vaccine on the current CDC schedule was licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial where the control group received an inert saline placebo. The "control" groups were given another vaccine—which itself was not tested against a true placebo. This circular referencing means the entire schedule lacks a foundational gold-standard safety benchmark. Why does this matter? Because we are in the midst of a silent pandemic. A pandemic of chronic disease. Since the early 1980s, chronic illness in American children has skyrocketed from under 13% to over 50%. Most of these diseases—asthma, allergies, autoimmune disorders—are forms of immune system dysregulation. What has changed in that same timeframe? The childhood vaccine schedule. In 1986, when vaccine manufacturers were granted legal immunity, the schedule was 3 injections. Today, a child following the full CDC schedule receives 29 injections by their first birthday, including in utero. Every one of those vaccines was licensed by a company that knew it would not be liable for any injuries. In the face of a catastrophic rise in childhood chronic illness, is it not the most basic duty of public health to honestly and transparently investigate all environmental insults, including the exponential increase in vaccines? This isn't anti-vax. It's pro-science. It's a demand for the rigorous safety science our children deserve.
3:03

The Unsettling Truth: Not One Childhood Vaccine Was Tested Against a True Placebo In a Senate hearing, attorney Aaron Siri was asked by Sen. Ron Johnson to clarify the research behind childhood vaccines. His answer was staggering. Siri submitted a 66-page document to the Senate citing FDA clinical trial data. His finding? NOT A SINGLE routine childhood vaccine on the current CDC schedule was licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial where the control group received an inert saline placebo. The "control" groups were given another vaccine—which itself was not tested against a true placebo. This circular referencing means the entire schedule lacks a foundational gold-standard safety benchmark. Why does this matter? Because we are in the midst of a silent pandemic. A pandemic of chronic disease. Since the early 1980s, chronic illness in American children has skyrocketed from under 13% to over 50%. Most of these diseases—asthma, allergies, autoimmune disorders—are forms of immune system dysregulation. What has changed in that same timeframe? The childhood vaccine schedule. In 1986, when vaccine manufacturers were granted legal immunity, the schedule was 3 injections. Today, a child following the full CDC schedule receives 29 injections by their first birthday, including in utero. Every one of those vaccines was licensed by a company that knew it would not be liable for any injuries. In the face of a catastrophic rise in childhood chronic illness, is it not the most basic duty of public health to honestly and transparently investigate all environmental insults, including the exponential increase in vaccines? This isn't anti-vax. It's pro-science. It's a demand for the rigorous safety science our children deserve.

Camus

96,137 просмотров • 1 год назад

"It Is A Myth That Vaccines Are Safe & Necessary...If I Had My Young Children Today, They Would Not Get A Single Vaccine." Dr Pierre Kory, MD "SIDS Occurs At 2, 4 & 6 Months Of Age...Right After Vaccination." "The Gov't Refuses To Do A True Placebo Safety Trial On Any Vaccine." Vaccines have not gone thru a long robust safety trial to prove they are 'safe & effective.' All other pharmaceuticals are safety trialed for 2-6yrs before approval by the CDC & FDA, but vaccines are not safety monitored this way. Hep-B Vaccine: Tested on only 147 infants & children, then monitored for 5 days & granted CDC approval. Hep-A Vaccine: Subjects were monitored for safety, 14 days. Meningitis Vaccine: Local & systemic adverse reactions were monitored for 7 days. Prevnar Pneumonia Vaccine: Study volunteers were monitored for 7 days. MMR Vaccine: Subjects were followed for 42 days. RSV Vaccine: Participants were monitored for 30 days. DTaP & TDaP Vaccines: Subjects were monitored for 14 days. Gardasil HPV Vaccine: Trial participants were surveilled for 14 days. Vaccines have not been safety trialed against a saline placebo. They have all used Aluminum adjuvant or another vaccine as the placebo in clinical trials. Gardasil HPV Clinical Trial: placebo was the Hep-A Vaccine & Aluminum Adjuvant. Hepatitis A Clinical Trial: placebo was the Hep-B Vaccine. Influenza A Clinical Trial: placebo was the Influenza B Vaccine. Meningitis Vaccine Clinical Trial: placebo was the DTaP Vaccine. Pertussis Vaccine Clinical Trial: placebo was the Tetanus & Diphtheria Vaccine. Polio Vaccine Clinical Trial: placebo was Diluted Polio Vaccine. Vaxelis 6 in 1 Vaccine Trial: placebo was the DTaP, Polio, HIB & Hep-B Vaccines. Hepatitis B Clinical Trial: placebo was Aluminum Adjuvant. The countries that have the most infant vaccines on their childhood schedules, have the highest infant mortality. The United States is #1 in infant vaccines & #1 in infant mortality, of all industrialized nations. 97% of infants who die of SIDS, do so within 7 days being vaccinated. 👇Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated Study👇 👇Vaccine Induced Neurodevelopment Disorders👇 👇Health Outcomes: Vaxxed Versus UnVaxxed👇 Speaker: Dr Pierre Kory, MD Video: @that_barefootgirlv
2:03

"It Is A Myth That Vaccines Are Safe & Necessary...If I Had My Young Children Today, They Would Not Get A Single Vaccine." Dr Pierre Kory, MD "SIDS Occurs At 2, 4 & 6 Months Of Age...Right After Vaccination." "The Gov't Refuses To Do A True Placebo Safety Trial On Any Vaccine." Vaccines have not gone thru a long robust safety trial to prove they are 'safe & effective.' All other pharmaceuticals are safety trialed for 2-6yrs before approval by the CDC & FDA, but vaccines are not safety monitored this way. Hep-B Vaccine: Tested on only 147 infants & children, then monitored for 5 days & granted CDC approval. Hep-A Vaccine: Subjects were monitored for safety, 14 days. Meningitis Vaccine: Local & systemic adverse reactions were monitored for 7 days. Prevnar Pneumonia Vaccine: Study volunteers were monitored for 7 days. MMR Vaccine: Subjects were followed for 42 days. RSV Vaccine: Participants were monitored for 30 days. DTaP & TDaP Vaccines: Subjects were monitored for 14 days. Gardasil HPV Vaccine: Trial participants were surveilled for 14 days. Vaccines have not been safety trialed against a saline placebo. They have all used Aluminum adjuvant or another vaccine as the placebo in clinical trials. Gardasil HPV Clinical Trial: placebo was the Hep-A Vaccine & Aluminum Adjuvant. Hepatitis A Clinical Trial: placebo was the Hep-B Vaccine. Influenza A Clinical Trial: placebo was the Influenza B Vaccine. Meningitis Vaccine Clinical Trial: placebo was the DTaP Vaccine. Pertussis Vaccine Clinical Trial: placebo was the Tetanus & Diphtheria Vaccine. Polio Vaccine Clinical Trial: placebo was Diluted Polio Vaccine. Vaxelis 6 in 1 Vaccine Trial: placebo was the DTaP, Polio, HIB & Hep-B Vaccines. Hepatitis B Clinical Trial: placebo was Aluminum Adjuvant. The countries that have the most infant vaccines on their childhood schedules, have the highest infant mortality. The United States is #1 in infant vaccines & #1 in infant mortality, of all industrialized nations. 97% of infants who die of SIDS, do so within 7 days being vaccinated. 👇Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated Study👇 👇Vaccine Induced Neurodevelopment Disorders👇 👇Health Outcomes: Vaxxed Versus UnVaxxed👇 Speaker: Dr Pierre Kory, MD Video: @that_barefootgirlv

Valerie Anne Smith

261,486 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Had another interview with a reporter the other day and they asked me about the studies the government has done on the shots collectively given to infants in the first year of life, and whether they used a proper control group of children who didn't receive those shots. These studies are such a joke. What they end up doing with MMR, for instance, is saying they took children who got all the vaccines except MMR, then all the vaccines plus MMR, and didn't see a statistically significant uptick in autism, and therefore MMR doesn't cause autism. And that study is fine, if all the other vaccines have already been proven not to cause autism. Then you have a proper control group. But the Institute of Medicine states clearly there is no study that isolates the DTaP vaccine. And the CDC has suspected DTaP since the 1986 Act, which literally listed diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis as being associated with autism and as the first thing that should be investigated once they took on the liability. That investigation has never happened. I think we should ask ourselves why. Because if DTaP causes autism, it erases the validity of the MMR study entirely. Your control group had a product in it that can cause autism. That is the problem with the science that has been done so far. I have had both Dr. Stanley Plotkin and Kathryn Edwards on the stand in front of Aaron Siri, two of the most iconic figures in the vaccine space. When asked, listing every vaccine one by one, "Do you have a study showing it doesn't cause autism?" Kathryn Edwards had none. Stanley Plotkin stated the same thing under oath. What they both explained is that they made an assumption that vaccines don't cause autism. I have that on video on my website. These are the authors of Plotkin's Vaccines, considered the bible on vaccinations. So if your top vaccine scientists cannot provide a single study under oath, why are newspapers reporting there are mountains of evidence? I sued the CDC. I said show me the trials you relied upon for the first six vaccines in the first six months of life to conclude they don't cause autism. They had zero. Not for Hepatitis B. Not for polio. Not for DTaP. Zero. There is no two or three year placebo trial for these products like you would see with every other drug. And that is not an accident. Causation is established in a placebo trial. If you skip that trial, you remove your ability to ever get to causation. You are permanently stuck in the land of "associated with." And the agency that is required to do the safety studies is the same agency defending itself in court against me. They are not doing the science, so you cannot win. That is where we are.
4:12

Had another interview with a reporter the other day and they asked me about the studies the government has done on the shots collectively given to infants in the first year of life, and whether they used a proper control group of children who didn't receive those shots. These studies are such a joke. What they end up doing with MMR, for instance, is saying they took children who got all the vaccines except MMR, then all the vaccines plus MMR, and didn't see a statistically significant uptick in autism, and therefore MMR doesn't cause autism. And that study is fine, if all the other vaccines have already been proven not to cause autism. Then you have a proper control group. But the Institute of Medicine states clearly there is no study that isolates the DTaP vaccine. And the CDC has suspected DTaP since the 1986 Act, which literally listed diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis as being associated with autism and as the first thing that should be investigated once they took on the liability. That investigation has never happened. I think we should ask ourselves why. Because if DTaP causes autism, it erases the validity of the MMR study entirely. Your control group had a product in it that can cause autism. That is the problem with the science that has been done so far. I have had both Dr. Stanley Plotkin and Kathryn Edwards on the stand in front of Aaron Siri, two of the most iconic figures in the vaccine space. When asked, listing every vaccine one by one, "Do you have a study showing it doesn't cause autism?" Kathryn Edwards had none. Stanley Plotkin stated the same thing under oath. What they both explained is that they made an assumption that vaccines don't cause autism. I have that on video on my website. These are the authors of Plotkin's Vaccines, considered the bible on vaccinations. So if your top vaccine scientists cannot provide a single study under oath, why are newspapers reporting there are mountains of evidence? I sued the CDC. I said show me the trials you relied upon for the first six vaccines in the first six months of life to conclude they don't cause autism. They had zero. Not for Hepatitis B. Not for polio. Not for DTaP. Zero. There is no two or three year placebo trial for these products like you would see with every other drug. And that is not an accident. Causation is established in a placebo trial. If you skip that trial, you remove your ability to ever get to causation. You are permanently stuck in the land of "associated with." And the agency that is required to do the safety studies is the same agency defending itself in court against me. They are not doing the science, so you cannot win. That is where we are.

Del Bigtree

29,970 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"Never a Placebo-Controlled Group": How Our Children's Vaccines Were Licensed on a Foundation of Flimsy Science. We are told the vaccine schedule is the most tested and safest in medical history. But what if that claim collapses under the weight of the actual data? Attorney Aaron Siri delivers a stunning fact that should halt every parent and citizen in their tracks: "Almost all childhood vaccines were licensed based on trials in which safety was reviewed for days or weeks after injection, underpowered, not enough kids, and there was never a placebo-controlled group for a single of the routine childhood vaccines injected into children, not one of them." Let that sink in. Not one. The gold standard of scientific research—the placebo-controlled trial—was abandoned for the entire routine childhood vaccine schedule. Why the Double Standard? For prescription drugs, companies run years-long, placebo-controlled trials. Why? Not ethics—economics. They are liable for damages. A harmful drug means financial ruin. For vaccines, the incentive is perversely flipped. With liability removed, the corporate boardroom's bottom-line calculus is simple: do the absolute minimum required for licensure. The Hep B Example is Jaw-Dropping Proof. The Combovax HB vaccine, given to babies on their first day of life, was licensed based on a "trial" that: - Monitored safety for just FIVE DAYS. - Included only 147 children. - Had NO control group whatsoever. This isn't just inadequate; it's scientifically indefensible. The recent COVID vaccine trials, often criticized as rushed, were vastly more comprehensive than this. The Root Cause? The Liability Shield. There is no doubt: if vaccine manufacturers were financially liable for injuries, the safety science would be exhaustive. They would never risk their profits on such flimsy data. The absence of liability created an absence of scientific rigor. This isn't conspiracy. It's cold, hard corporate calculus, and our children are the ones living in the experiment. It's long past time to demand the same gold-standard safety proof for vaccines that we demand for every pill we swallow.
2:12

"Never a Placebo-Controlled Group": How Our Children's Vaccines Were Licensed on a Foundation of Flimsy Science. We are told the vaccine schedule is the most tested and safest in medical history. But what if that claim collapses under the weight of the actual data? Attorney Aaron Siri delivers a stunning fact that should halt every parent and citizen in their tracks: "Almost all childhood vaccines were licensed based on trials in which safety was reviewed for days or weeks after injection, underpowered, not enough kids, and there was never a placebo-controlled group for a single of the routine childhood vaccines injected into children, not one of them." Let that sink in. Not one. The gold standard of scientific research—the placebo-controlled trial—was abandoned for the entire routine childhood vaccine schedule. Why the Double Standard? For prescription drugs, companies run years-long, placebo-controlled trials. Why? Not ethics—economics. They are liable for damages. A harmful drug means financial ruin. For vaccines, the incentive is perversely flipped. With liability removed, the corporate boardroom's bottom-line calculus is simple: do the absolute minimum required for licensure. The Hep B Example is Jaw-Dropping Proof. The Combovax HB vaccine, given to babies on their first day of life, was licensed based on a "trial" that: - Monitored safety for just FIVE DAYS. - Included only 147 children. - Had NO control group whatsoever. This isn't just inadequate; it's scientifically indefensible. The recent COVID vaccine trials, often criticized as rushed, were vastly more comprehensive than this. The Root Cause? The Liability Shield. There is no doubt: if vaccine manufacturers were financially liable for injuries, the safety science would be exhaustive. They would never risk their profits on such flimsy data. The absence of liability created an absence of scientific rigor. This isn't conspiracy. It's cold, hard corporate calculus, and our children are the ones living in the experiment. It's long past time to demand the same gold-standard safety proof for vaccines that we demand for every pill we swallow.

Camus

38,809 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

“Unless you're comparing a vaccine against saline, how can you say it’s safe?” Dr. Sherri Tenpenny just exposed Pharma’s “safe and effective” narrative as a complete sham. “There has never been—on any one of the vaccines that are currently given—a truly placebo-controlled trial where in one set of children they were given the new vaccine, and then the other set of children it was a true saline placebo.” “All of the vaccine trials are a vaccine compared to another vaccine,” Alex Clark: “How long were the majority of the safety trials done on the vaccines on the childhood schedule?” Dr. Tenpenny: “The average length of time is probably somewhere between 15 and 30 days.” “It’s been as short as 4 days.” “When they brought the first hepatitis B vaccine to market, they followed to see if there were any side effects for 5 days.” “The second hepatitis B vaccine that came to market, they followed side effects for 4 days.” “That is not a safety trial.” “It can take months to years to develop autoimmune diseases, neurological complications, other types of things like [gastrointestinal] disorders.” “Encephalitis can start right away, but it can be slow brewing for a long period of time.” Dr Sherri Tenpenny
2:37

“Unless you're comparing a vaccine against saline, how can you say it’s safe?” Dr. Sherri Tenpenny just exposed Pharma’s “safe and effective” narrative as a complete sham. “There has never been—on any one of the vaccines that are currently given—a truly placebo-controlled trial where in one set of children they were given the new vaccine, and then the other set of children it was a true saline placebo.” “All of the vaccine trials are a vaccine compared to another vaccine,” Alex Clark: “How long were the majority of the safety trials done on the vaccines on the childhood schedule?” Dr. Tenpenny: “The average length of time is probably somewhere between 15 and 30 days.” “It’s been as short as 4 days.” “When they brought the first hepatitis B vaccine to market, they followed to see if there were any side effects for 5 days.” “The second hepatitis B vaccine that came to market, they followed side effects for 4 days.” “That is not a safety trial.” “It can take months to years to develop autoimmune diseases, neurological complications, other types of things like [gastrointestinal] disorders.” “Encephalitis can start right away, but it can be slow brewing for a long period of time.” Dr Sherri Tenpenny

Children’s Health Defense

49,833 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Vaccine Safety "Pyramid Scheme" Exposed: The Shocking Truth They Never Wanted You to See In an amazing presentation, attorney Aaron Siri drops a truth bomb that should be heard by every parent, doctor, and policymaker. He systematically dismantles the most common defense of the childhood vaccine schedule: the claim that they were tested against saline placebos. Siri reveals a chart, built from years of work and sourced directly from FDA documents, that tracks the clinical trials for every single routine injected childhood vaccine. The categorical finding? Not one. Not a single one. Here is the stunning reality: - No Saline Placebos: There has NEVER been a routine injected childhood vaccine licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial using an inert saline solution. - The "Pyramid Scheme" of Safety: Instead, new vaccines are tested against older vaccines, which were themselves tested against even older ones. This creates a "daisy chain" where safety is only ever compared to another product that also lacked a true safety baseline. - The Proof is in the FDA's Own Documents: The source for this chart is the FDA's website. As Siri states, "If you don't agree with this information... you're arguing with the FDA." Some of the most shocking examples: - Hepatitis B: The first vaccines for newborns were licensed with no control group at all. - PCV (Pneumococcal): The original Prevnar 7 was tested against another experimental vaccine—a practice Siri compares to testing a new cancer drug against another unproven cancer drug. - Polio (IPOL): The modern IPV vaccine, a completely different technology from the Salk vaccine, was licensed with a safety review of just three days and no control group. - MMR: The clinical trials for the current MMR II, which uses human fetal cell lines, used no control group. - HPV (Gardasil): The "placebo" used in trials for thousands of young girls was not saline. It often contained the aluminum adjuvant—a known neurotoxin with no therapeutic benefit—effectively rigging the trial to mask true adverse event rates. This rigged system allows serious adverse event rates in healthy children to creep into the 7%, 8%, and even 9% range in clinical trials. Because the control group gets a similarly reactive shot, the numbers appear "similar" and are deemed "safe," hiding the true risk. The bottom line: The entire childhood vaccine schedule rests on a foundation that has never been properly tested for safety against an inert placebo. The baseline safety profile for these products is, and has always been, unknown. This isn't an opinion. It's a fact documented by the FDA itself. If this doesn't make you question everything, what will?
39:36

Vaccine Safety "Pyramid Scheme" Exposed: The Shocking Truth They Never Wanted You to See In an amazing presentation, attorney Aaron Siri drops a truth bomb that should be heard by every parent, doctor, and policymaker. He systematically dismantles the most common defense of the childhood vaccine schedule: the claim that they were tested against saline placebos. Siri reveals a chart, built from years of work and sourced directly from FDA documents, that tracks the clinical trials for every single routine injected childhood vaccine. The categorical finding? Not one. Not a single one. Here is the stunning reality: - No Saline Placebos: There has NEVER been a routine injected childhood vaccine licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial using an inert saline solution. - The "Pyramid Scheme" of Safety: Instead, new vaccines are tested against older vaccines, which were themselves tested against even older ones. This creates a "daisy chain" where safety is only ever compared to another product that also lacked a true safety baseline. - The Proof is in the FDA's Own Documents: The source for this chart is the FDA's website. As Siri states, "If you don't agree with this information... you're arguing with the FDA." Some of the most shocking examples: - Hepatitis B: The first vaccines for newborns were licensed with no control group at all. - PCV (Pneumococcal): The original Prevnar 7 was tested against another experimental vaccine—a practice Siri compares to testing a new cancer drug against another unproven cancer drug. - Polio (IPOL): The modern IPV vaccine, a completely different technology from the Salk vaccine, was licensed with a safety review of just three days and no control group. - MMR: The clinical trials for the current MMR II, which uses human fetal cell lines, used no control group. - HPV (Gardasil): The "placebo" used in trials for thousands of young girls was not saline. It often contained the aluminum adjuvant—a known neurotoxin with no therapeutic benefit—effectively rigging the trial to mask true adverse event rates. This rigged system allows serious adverse event rates in healthy children to creep into the 7%, 8%, and even 9% range in clinical trials. Because the control group gets a similarly reactive shot, the numbers appear "similar" and are deemed "safe," hiding the true risk. The bottom line: The entire childhood vaccine schedule rests on a foundation that has never been properly tested for safety against an inert placebo. The baseline safety profile for these products is, and has always been, unknown. This isn't an opinion. It's a fact documented by the FDA itself. If this doesn't make you question everything, what will?

Camus

474,030 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад