Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The Galaxy Z Fold 8 has a serious performance problem The Galaxy Z Fold 8 uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy. On the S26 Ultra, this chip scores around 3,102 single-core and 10,405 multi-core in Geekbench 7. On my Fold 8, with no apps running in...

UniverseIce's profile picture

Ice Universe

595,588 subscribers

138,615 просмотров • 13 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 25

Фото профиля Joe
Joe13 дней назад

You loose your s..t, when it's the month of September, and then change your stance in the month of January! Think about the insane amount of people you misguided in the past few years into buying phones!

Фото профиля Al3xis
Al3xis13 дней назад

I just tested my z fold 8

Фото профиля Sam
Sam13 дней назад

My Fold 8 got this score.

Фото профиля kritika
kritika13 дней назад

Looks like the reason of all the problems in your life is Samsung!!

Фото профиля Macstappen
Macstappen13 дней назад

What? Ur faking. Check attached screen record video i took just now. Max battery temp 35, room temp 27. No heating. Apps constant refresh in background..constant using 5 apps together. I feel its the most optimized samsung phone..i have s24ultra too and its too bad wrt heat/batt.

Фото профиля T3CHGY007
T3CHGY00713 дней назад

Here is the score from my fold 8! Looks like you might have a major issue with yours!

Фото профиля Momo Valverde 7️⃣4️⃣
Momo Valverde 7️⃣4️⃣13 дней назад

The lack of vapor chamber means faster thermal throttling. The longer-term usage will be under concerned. This heat will cause several issues to the device's components display, green line, motherboard, deteriorate both PMIC & battery health after extensive usage.

Фото профиля T. Shopov
T. Shopov13 дней назад

One of the extremely useless things these days is the benchmark scores.

Фото профиля Tony
Tony13 дней назад

Did they reduce it because of thinness and heating problems?

Фото профиля Wallace Moté
Wallace Moté13 дней назад

This is Fold8 in Roblox. 100% of GPU usage, ~70% RAM and CPU. Cooked.

Фото профиля Dan
Dan13 дней назад

Result on my Fold 8, pretty disappointing :/

Фото профиля WuM
WuM13 дней назад

mine's 3077 / 10431 folded. 3058 / 10123 unfolded. 16gb/1tb version. what version is yours?

Фото профиля dpr_hood
dpr_hood13 дней назад

Bro, don't be so rigid about using a phone. I don't see any big problem with it

Фото профиля Freddy Fresh
Freddy Fresh13 дней назад

So make the phone a bit thicker and add a bigger vapor chamber. Adding 10g-15g more of weight?

Фото профиля Sin Sor
Sin Sor13 дней назад

Same

Фото профиля MobileJack
MobileJack13 дней назад

That doesn't explain the stuttering. 50% of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5's performance is actually more than enough to run the system completely smoothly. It really has to be down to the software.

Фото профиля WordsFromTheDevil
WordsFromTheDevil13 дней назад

My fold 8 works just fine.

Фото профиля Shah
Shah13 дней назад

snapdragon 8 elite gen 5 is a beast but samsung software optimizations are always absolute trash for the fold line

Фото профиля Marius
Marius13 дней назад

Welcome to ScamDroid

Фото профиля سعيد
سعيد13 дней назад

احذف التطبيق هذا وبيرجع يشتغل معك طبيعي وقلل من الانميشن

Фото профиля Marcos🤘🏼
Marcos🤘🏼13 дней назад

How much is Apple paying you?

Фото профиля Rafael Arias
Rafael Arias13 дней назад

Ya sabemos que Apple te pagó para que subieras esta mierda de Post

Фото профиля itsmenotyou
itsmenotyou13 дней назад

Bro, your posts are sounding dumb and more dumb by the day.

Фото профиля Munkhjin
Munkhjin13 дней назад

What about fold 7?

Фото профиля Buckiee
Buckiee13 дней назад

Fold 6 probably sustains performance better than this

Похожие видео

As one of the most notorious rumor spreaders on X, he's back at it again. He has built a reputation for spreading false information, and this time is no different. The so called "Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra" photo he posted is actually just Samsung China's exclusive W25. It's obvious he has never even seen the W25. He simply took advantage of the fact that most people outside China aren't familiar with the device and tried to pass it off as an exclusive Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra leak. It's honestly ridiculous.😂
0:37

As one of the most notorious rumor spreaders on X, he's back at it again. He has built a reputation for spreading false information, and this time is no different. The so called "Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra" photo he posted is actually just Samsung China's exclusive W25. It's obvious he has never even seen the W25. He simply took advantage of the fact that most people outside China aren't familiar with the device and tried to pass it off as an exclusive Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra leak. It's honestly ridiculous.😂

Ice Universe

93,089 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Xiaomi announces the Xring O3. The Xiaomi 18 Fold wide foldable and Xiaomi Mi Pad 9 Pro Max are launching with this chip next month, i.e., September 2026. Xring O3: - 10 cores CPU 2 x 4.35 GHz C1-Ultra 4 x 3.68 GHz C1-Premium 4 x 3.15 GHz C1-Pro - 16-core G2-Ultra NX GPU - 4-core low power NPU with 200 TOPS - TSMC 3nm node - Scores 5.22 million on AnTuTu - LPDDR6 RAM support - Geekbench score 3,945 single-core and 15,221 multi-core Xring O100: - 6nm wafer-level vertical stacking (wafer on wafer) - AI accelerator chip for large-scale edge computing - Ultra-high bandwidth of 1.22 TB/s - Edge inference speed up to 330 TPS Xring D100: - 3nm AI chip for intelligent autonomous driving with high computing power - 20-core high-performance CPU - 16-core high-performance NPU - 160GB unified memory that can deploy ultra-large models with up to 200B parameters
0:56

Xiaomi announces the Xring O3. The Xiaomi 18 Fold wide foldable and Xiaomi Mi Pad 9 Pro Max are launching with this chip next month, i.e., September 2026. Xring O3: - 10 cores CPU 2 x 4.35 GHz C1-Ultra 4 x 3.68 GHz C1-Premium 4 x 3.15 GHz C1-Pro - 16-core G2-Ultra NX GPU - 4-core low power NPU with 200 TOPS - TSMC 3nm node - Scores 5.22 million on AnTuTu - LPDDR6 RAM support - Geekbench score 3,945 single-core and 15,221 multi-core Xring O100: - 6nm wafer-level vertical stacking (wafer on wafer) - AI accelerator chip for large-scale edge computing - Ultra-high bandwidth of 1.22 TB/s - Edge inference speed up to 330 TPS Xring D100: - 3nm AI chip for intelligent autonomous driving with high computing power - 20-core high-performance CPU - 16-core high-performance NPU - 160GB unified memory that can deploy ultra-large models with up to 200B parameters

Abhishek Yadav

22,049 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has been all over my feeds -- probably because having a big screen whenever you want it is great. And with Android 16 and OneUI 8, there's just a ton of stuff you can do to take advantage of all that extra space.
1:25

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has been all over my feeds -- probably because having a big screen whenever you want it is great. And with Android 16 and OneUI 8, there's just a ton of stuff you can do to take advantage of all that extra space.

Dieter Bohn

33,922 просмотров • 1 год назад

Pixel exists so Google can demonstrate its own services under conditions it controls, and in 2026 that service is Gemini. Anyone can run Gemini on a Galaxy or an iPhone. Only on Pixel does Google set the silicon, the integration, and the ship date together. The foldable comparisons for Pixel Fold might be unflattering today because of the excitement around Galaxy Fold 8 and the upcoming iPhone but Google has a full updated portfolio. Plus, Google can afford to be second on foldable geometry. It cannot afford to be second on how Gemini feels day to day.
1:14

Pixel exists so Google can demonstrate its own services under conditions it controls, and in 2026 that service is Gemini. Anyone can run Gemini on a Galaxy or an iPhone. Only on Pixel does Google set the silicon, the integration, and the ship date together. The foldable comparisons for Pixel Fold might be unflattering today because of the excitement around Galaxy Fold 8 and the upcoming iPhone but Google has a full updated portfolio. Plus, Google can afford to be second on foldable geometry. It cannot afford to be second on how Gemini feels day to day.

Carolina Milanesi

19,100 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The perfect combo: Galaxy Z Fold8 + Home Up Multi-Finger Gestures Remember the new multi-finger gestures added to Home Up a few days ago? I actually think they're even more useful on the Galaxy Z Fold8 than on the Galaxy S26. Here's a simple example. When using the Fold8 in portrait mode, the volume buttons sit near the top of the phone, making them a bit awkward to reach. That's where multi-finger gestures shine. I mapped three-finger swipe up and down to volume control, so I can adjust the volume instantly without touching the physical buttons. I also assigned four different actions to two-finger swipes in each direction, with each gesture launching a different app. Once you get used to it, it makes navigating the Fold8 incredibly fast and convenient. If you own a Galaxy Z Fold8, give Home Up's multi-finger gestures a try. It's one of those features that genuinely improves the experience.
0:34

The perfect combo: Galaxy Z Fold8 + Home Up Multi-Finger Gestures Remember the new multi-finger gestures added to Home Up a few days ago? I actually think they're even more useful on the Galaxy Z Fold8 than on the Galaxy S26. Here's a simple example. When using the Fold8 in portrait mode, the volume buttons sit near the top of the phone, making them a bit awkward to reach. That's where multi-finger gestures shine. I mapped three-finger swipe up and down to volume control, so I can adjust the volume instantly without touching the physical buttons. I also assigned four different actions to two-finger swipes in each direction, with each gesture launching a different app. Once you get used to it, it makes navigating the Fold8 incredibly fast and convenient. If you own a Galaxy Z Fold8, give Home Up's multi-finger gestures a try. It's one of those features that genuinely improves the experience.

Ice Universe

65,007 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

iPhone Duo just made 5 years of Samsung crease excuses look like a joke Samsung fans spent half a decade saying "you stop noticing the crease after a week." Galaxy Fold 1 had it. Fold 2 had it. Fold 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Eight generations and you can still see the crease in any lighting from any angle Apple showed up with generation one and the crease is invisible. Not reduced. Not minimized. Invisible. Different angles, different lighting, it does not matter. The matte nano-texture display eliminates it completely Samsung had 8 attempts and $4 billion in foldable R&D. Apple needed one. The same company that told you creases were "normal in foldable technology" just got exposed for accepting a problem they could not solve This is not about the phone anymore. This is about Samsung selling you a compromise for $1,799 every year and calling it premium while the actual solution existed and they just could not figure it out Every new hands-on is confirming the crease is gone. I am collecting every angle comparison between Duo and Fold 8 side by side as they come in. Follow if you want to see what Samsung does not want next to their phone
0:23

iPhone Duo just made 5 years of Samsung crease excuses look like a joke Samsung fans spent half a decade saying "you stop noticing the crease after a week." Galaxy Fold 1 had it. Fold 2 had it. Fold 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Eight generations and you can still see the crease in any lighting from any angle Apple showed up with generation one and the crease is invisible. Not reduced. Not minimized. Invisible. Different angles, different lighting, it does not matter. The matte nano-texture display eliminates it completely Samsung had 8 attempts and $4 billion in foldable R&D. Apple needed one. The same company that told you creases were "normal in foldable technology" just got exposed for accepting a problem they could not solve This is not about the phone anymore. This is about Samsung selling you a compromise for $1,799 every year and calling it premium while the actual solution existed and they just could not figure it out Every new hands-on is confirming the crease is gone. I am collecting every angle comparison between Duo and Fold 8 side by side as they come in. Follow if you want to see what Samsung does not want next to their phone

Cip⚡️

1,131,810 просмотров • 11 дней назад

I think a video tells the story much better. Here's a crease comparison between four foldable phones: Galaxy Z Fold7, Galaxy Z Fold8, OPPO Find N6, and vivo X Fold6. What impressed me most about the Galaxy Z Fold8 isn't just how shallow the crease is, but how well it holds up over time. Thanks to its redesigned main hinge structure and improved stress distribution, the Z Fold8 appears to maintain its shallow crease for a longer period and even shows a degree of self-recovery. For example, when I unfolded the phone this morning, the crease was slightly more noticeable than it had been the night before. After leaving the device fully open for about 10 minutes, the crease gradually became less visible and returned to almost the same condition I had seen the previous evening. Of course, this is based on my observations of a single retail unit during everyday use, so it doesn't necessarily represent every device. If it continues to maintain this level of crease performance after long-term, repeated folding, then the Galaxy Z Fold8 could set a new benchmark for crease durability among foldable smartphones.
0:44

I think a video tells the story much better. Here's a crease comparison between four foldable phones: Galaxy Z Fold7, Galaxy Z Fold8, OPPO Find N6, and vivo X Fold6. What impressed me most about the Galaxy Z Fold8 isn't just how shallow the crease is, but how well it holds up over time. Thanks to its redesigned main hinge structure and improved stress distribution, the Z Fold8 appears to maintain its shallow crease for a longer period and even shows a degree of self-recovery. For example, when I unfolded the phone this morning, the crease was slightly more noticeable than it had been the night before. After leaving the device fully open for about 10 minutes, the crease gradually became less visible and returned to almost the same condition I had seen the previous evening. Of course, this is based on my observations of a single retail unit during everyday use, so it doesn't necessarily represent every device. If it continues to maintain this level of crease performance after long-term, repeated folding, then the Galaxy Z Fold8 could set a new benchmark for crease durability among foldable smartphones.

Ice Universe

162,497 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

TM Roh, please take some time and actually use a Galaxy Z Fold 8. Let me explain why I’m saying this. This may seem like a tiny issue. It’s just an animation when opening and closing an album in Gallery. But what bothers me is what this tiny detail reveals: just how little Samsung’s software team seems to care about these parts of the user experience. I seriously wonder whether some of the executives responsible for this product, including TM Roh, have ever actually used the Galaxy Z Fold 8 as their primary phone. Because this problem is ridiculously easy to notice. You don’t need days of testing. Use the Z Fold 8 on its inner display for half an hour, open Gallery, tap an album cover, then go back. You’ll immediately see it: there is basically no proper transition animation. The interface simply switches from one screen to another. I have three levels of expectations for system animations: 1. Does an animation exist? 2. Does it look good? 3. Does it have originality and its own visual identity? If the animation looks bad, I can criticize the aesthetics. If it looks ordinary, I can say it lacks polish. But Samsung hasn’t even passed Level 1. And that becomes even more ridiculous when you compare it with other Android foldables. Galaxy Z Fold 8, Galaxy Z TriFold, OPPO Find N6, Xiaomi 18 Fold. They are all Android foldables dealing with the same basic challenges of large screens, multitasking and UI transitions. So why can OPPO do it? Why can Xiaomi do it? Why does Samsung continue to ignore something this basic, even on a foldable costing thousands of dollars? Is Samsung incapable of making these animations? Of course they can. They simply don’t seem to consider them important enough. Leave it unfinished and someone will defend Samsung anyway. Make the experience crude and someone will say, “It doesn’t affect functionality.” Sell the phone for $2,000 and people will still buy it. Over time, why would Samsung feel any urgency to polish these details? The feature works. Good enough. Animations? Whatever. Details? Whatever. Aesthetics? Whatever. Those little things users see, touch and feel hundreds of times every day? Apparently, whatever. But this is 2026. OPPO and Xiaomi are already putting serious effort into animation logic, visual continuity, interaction feedback and their own software aesthetics. If Samsung continues treating “the feature works” as the finish line, the gap in software experience will only become more obvious. And now the iPhone Duo has arrived. Samsung no longer gets to assume that people looking for a premium foldable will eventually come back to Galaxy because there is no serious alternative. That advantage cannot last forever. What makes this even more unfortunate is Samsung’s enormous influence on the Android market outside China. For many people, Galaxy is their primary window into high-end Android. When crude interactions like this remain unchanged for years, people gradually get used to them. They start thinking this is simply what Android is supposed to feel like, and that animation, visual continuity and software aesthetics don’t really matter. And many of the people who couldn’t tolerate it may have already moved to the iPhone. That is exactly why I keep talking about these seemingly “tiny” problems. User experience is built from hundreds of tiny details like these. So if you own a Galaxy Z Fold 8, try this right now. Unfold it. Open Gallery on the inner display. Tap an album cover. Then go back. Look at it yourself. Is this really the software experience you expect from a nearly $2,000 flagship foldable in 2026? Stop rationalizing every problem Samsung leaves unfinished. The more users defend every missing detail, the less reason Samsung has to improve it. It’s your money. You bought a flagship. You have every right to expect Samsung to get the basics right.
0:27

TM Roh, please take some time and actually use a Galaxy Z Fold 8. Let me explain why I’m saying this. This may seem like a tiny issue. It’s just an animation when opening and closing an album in Gallery. But what bothers me is what this tiny detail reveals: just how little Samsung’s software team seems to care about these parts of the user experience. I seriously wonder whether some of the executives responsible for this product, including TM Roh, have ever actually used the Galaxy Z Fold 8 as their primary phone. Because this problem is ridiculously easy to notice. You don’t need days of testing. Use the Z Fold 8 on its inner display for half an hour, open Gallery, tap an album cover, then go back. You’ll immediately see it: there is basically no proper transition animation. The interface simply switches from one screen to another. I have three levels of expectations for system animations: 1. Does an animation exist? 2. Does it look good? 3. Does it have originality and its own visual identity? If the animation looks bad, I can criticize the aesthetics. If it looks ordinary, I can say it lacks polish. But Samsung hasn’t even passed Level 1. And that becomes even more ridiculous when you compare it with other Android foldables. Galaxy Z Fold 8, Galaxy Z TriFold, OPPO Find N6, Xiaomi 18 Fold. They are all Android foldables dealing with the same basic challenges of large screens, multitasking and UI transitions. So why can OPPO do it? Why can Xiaomi do it? Why does Samsung continue to ignore something this basic, even on a foldable costing thousands of dollars? Is Samsung incapable of making these animations? Of course they can. They simply don’t seem to consider them important enough. Leave it unfinished and someone will defend Samsung anyway. Make the experience crude and someone will say, “It doesn’t affect functionality.” Sell the phone for $2,000 and people will still buy it. Over time, why would Samsung feel any urgency to polish these details? The feature works. Good enough. Animations? Whatever. Details? Whatever. Aesthetics? Whatever. Those little things users see, touch and feel hundreds of times every day? Apparently, whatever. But this is 2026. OPPO and Xiaomi are already putting serious effort into animation logic, visual continuity, interaction feedback and their own software aesthetics. If Samsung continues treating “the feature works” as the finish line, the gap in software experience will only become more obvious. And now the iPhone Duo has arrived. Samsung no longer gets to assume that people looking for a premium foldable will eventually come back to Galaxy because there is no serious alternative. That advantage cannot last forever. What makes this even more unfortunate is Samsung’s enormous influence on the Android market outside China. For many people, Galaxy is their primary window into high-end Android. When crude interactions like this remain unchanged for years, people gradually get used to them. They start thinking this is simply what Android is supposed to feel like, and that animation, visual continuity and software aesthetics don’t really matter. And many of the people who couldn’t tolerate it may have already moved to the iPhone. That is exactly why I keep talking about these seemingly “tiny” problems. User experience is built from hundreds of tiny details like these. So if you own a Galaxy Z Fold 8, try this right now. Unfold it. Open Gallery on the inner display. Tap an album cover. Then go back. Look at it yourself. Is this really the software experience you expect from a nearly $2,000 flagship foldable in 2026? Stop rationalizing every problem Samsung leaves unfinished. The more users defend every missing detail, the less reason Samsung has to improve it. It’s your money. You bought a flagship. You have every right to expect Samsung to get the basics right.

Ice Universe

101,989 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Hands On! This new smartphone is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, and it is an absolute beast. The 3rd Gen Qualcomm Oryon CPU supercharges performance by 20% while bringing 35% better efficiency for longer battery life. The 200MP camera and 5X telephoto lenses get upgraded, and the Spectra ISP enables improved nightography and videography in low-light conditions, which is something I am really looking forward to. Samsung is leveraging the power of the improved Snapdragon NPU for Agentic Al. Now Nudge and faster Photo Assist really impressed me, and I can't wait to start testing this phone. Do you want to see a Galaxy S26 Ultra Cinematic 8K video shot with APV codec? Let me know! #samsung #samsunggalaxy #galaxys26ultra #s26ultra #sponsoredbySnapdragon
1:17

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Hands On! This new smartphone is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, and it is an absolute beast. The 3rd Gen Qualcomm Oryon CPU supercharges performance by 20% while bringing 35% better efficiency for longer battery life. The 200MP camera and 5X telephoto lenses get upgraded, and the Spectra ISP enables improved nightography and videography in low-light conditions, which is something I am really looking forward to. Samsung is leveraging the power of the improved Snapdragon NPU for Agentic Al. Now Nudge and faster Photo Assist really impressed me, and I can't wait to start testing this phone. Do you want to see a Galaxy S26 Ultra Cinematic 8K video shot with APV codec? Let me know! #samsung #samsunggalaxy #galaxys26ultra #s26ultra #sponsoredbySnapdragon

Danny Winget

11,095 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Max your view with the next generation of Fold. Meet the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra—unfold to double the screen for two full windows side-by-side. No switching windows. Just getting things done with ease, all at once. And now, introducing the all-new Galaxy Z Fold8—the all-new shape frames your feed, then opens for a wide aspect ratio that you can immerse in. No awkward cropping. Just viewing the way it was meant to be. Two distinct shapes, for max power and max joy. Which Fold fits you? Know more: | #GalaxyAI #GalaxyZFold8Ultra #GalaxyZFold8 #SidebysideMultiWindows #ContentNative #Samsung
0:30

Max your view with the next generation of Fold. Meet the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra—unfold to double the screen for two full windows side-by-side. No switching windows. Just getting things done with ease, all at once. And now, introducing the all-new Galaxy Z Fold8—the all-new shape frames your feed, then opens for a wide aspect ratio that you can immerse in. No awkward cropping. Just viewing the way it was meant to be. Two distinct shapes, for max power and max joy. Which Fold fits you? Know more: | #GalaxyAI #GalaxyZFold8Ultra #GalaxyZFold8 #SidebysideMultiWindows #ContentNative #Samsung

Samsung India

16,675 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

First, the conclusion: the so called Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leak from last night turned out to be a false alarm. After watching the original video over and over again, I'm convinced it isn't a Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra. It's actually the blue version of the Galaxy Z Fold7. Because of the lighting and color temperature, the blue frame appeared black on camera, which led to the confusion. Here are the three biggest clues: 1. The inner display camera cutout is too large. Compared with the official Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra renders, the inner camera hole on the Fold8 Ultra is noticeably smaller. The one in the leaked video is still the larger Fold7-style cutout. 2. The rear camera housing doesn't match. The cylindrical camera housing reflects light with a bright metallic sheen, which is much more consistent with the blue Galaxy Z Fold7 than the black Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra. Some of the hardware details also don't line up. 3. The inner display is still highly reflective. The device in the video shows obvious screen reflections. However, the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is the first Fold to feature an anti reflective inner display film. Anyone familiar with Samsung foldables should immediately notice that the reflections don't look like this. Based on these three points, I'm confident the device in the video is a blue Galaxy Z Fold7, not the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra. The confusion is understandable because the two generations are incredibly similar. They share the same overall dimensions and aspect ratio, making them very easy to mix up. The good news is that the real Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra will be even better. It will have an even less visible crease than the Fold7, along with the new anti reflective inner display film.
2:02

First, the conclusion: the so called Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leak from last night turned out to be a false alarm. After watching the original video over and over again, I'm convinced it isn't a Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra. It's actually the blue version of the Galaxy Z Fold7. Because of the lighting and color temperature, the blue frame appeared black on camera, which led to the confusion. Here are the three biggest clues: 1. The inner display camera cutout is too large. Compared with the official Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra renders, the inner camera hole on the Fold8 Ultra is noticeably smaller. The one in the leaked video is still the larger Fold7-style cutout. 2. The rear camera housing doesn't match. The cylindrical camera housing reflects light with a bright metallic sheen, which is much more consistent with the blue Galaxy Z Fold7 than the black Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra. Some of the hardware details also don't line up. 3. The inner display is still highly reflective. The device in the video shows obvious screen reflections. However, the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is the first Fold to feature an anti reflective inner display film. Anyone familiar with Samsung foldables should immediately notice that the reflections don't look like this. Based on these three points, I'm confident the device in the video is a blue Galaxy Z Fold7, not the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra. The confusion is understandable because the two generations are incredibly similar. They share the same overall dimensions and aspect ratio, making them very easy to mix up. The good news is that the real Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra will be even better. It will have an even less visible crease than the Fold7, along with the new anti reflective inner display film.

Ice Universe

127,679 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

How will Polkadot unlock the DOT tokenomics by creating more demand for the DOT token? With the next evolution of Polkadot parachains - multi-core elastic scaling. Here is what it enables: Make your chain run faster, do more transactions and just pay for the extra cores (in DOT) when you need them! Gavin Wood says that multi-core elastic scaling will unlock DOT tokenomics by increasing the DOT demand from parachains that want to pay more for better performance Currently, the main issue is that there are only 45 parachains, and only one core per parachain. "But there are chains out that would love to pay more money - more DOT - and have more cores to make their chain run faster. We know this because we are talking to them"
1:23

How will Polkadot unlock the DOT tokenomics by creating more demand for the DOT token? With the next evolution of Polkadot parachains - multi-core elastic scaling. Here is what it enables: Make your chain run faster, do more transactions and just pay for the extra cores (in DOT) when you need them! Gavin Wood says that multi-core elastic scaling will unlock DOT tokenomics by increasing the DOT demand from parachains that want to pay more for better performance Currently, the main issue is that there are only 45 parachains, and only one core per parachain. "But there are chains out that would love to pay more money - more DOT - and have more cores to make their chain run faster. We know this because we are talking to them"

MR SHIFT 🦁

20,813 просмотров • 1 год назад

First hands-on look at the new Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 ✨ • Much thinner at 8.9mm folded and just 4.2mm unfolded • Noticeably lighter at 215g, even lighter than Galaxy S25 Ultra without tablet inside 👀 • 6.5-inch Dynamic AMOLED cover display, a wider screen with a new 21:9 aspect ratio. • 8-inch Dynamic AMOLED main display • Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy • 200MP main camera, 12MP Ultra-Wide, 10MP 3x telephoto • 4400mAh battery, 25W charging, 30 min to 50% • One UI 8 on Android 16 • IP48 $1999. Pre-order starting July 9, with general availability beginning July 25. Available in Blue Shadow, Silver Shadow, Jetblack and Mint (online exclusive) color options. Pre-order here:
0:46

First hands-on look at the new Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 ✨ • Much thinner at 8.9mm folded and just 4.2mm unfolded • Noticeably lighter at 215g, even lighter than Galaxy S25 Ultra without tablet inside 👀 • 6.5-inch Dynamic AMOLED cover display, a wider screen with a new 21:9 aspect ratio. • 8-inch Dynamic AMOLED main display • Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy • 200MP main camera, 12MP Ultra-Wide, 10MP 3x telephoto • 4400mAh battery, 25W charging, 30 min to 50% • One UI 8 on Android 16 • IP48 $1999. Pre-order starting July 9, with general availability beginning July 25. Available in Blue Shadow, Silver Shadow, Jetblack and Mint (online exclusive) color options. Pre-order here:

Ben Geskin

51,537 просмотров • 1 год назад

Create a Game. Zero Code🪄 Bullet Core - Demonstration of Game Development with Alchemist AI V2. (Best played in maximized mode) This fully functional shooter features customizable mechanics like leveling, dynamic damage formulas, critical hit rates, damage indicators and boss battles - all generated without a single line of code. With V2's Multi-AI system, each aspect of the game - logic, rendering, and mechanics - is handled by specialized AI agents, delivering superior game logic, smoother performance, and faster iterations. Bullet Core exemplifies what’s possible with Alchemist AI V2 - enabling anyone to bring complex games to life with just a simple description.
0:23

Create a Game. Zero Code🪄 Bullet Core - Demonstration of Game Development with Alchemist AI V2. (Best played in maximized mode) This fully functional shooter features customizable mechanics like leveling, dynamic damage formulas, critical hit rates, damage indicators and boss battles - all generated without a single line of code. With V2's Multi-AI system, each aspect of the game - logic, rendering, and mechanics - is handled by specialized AI agents, delivering superior game logic, smoother performance, and faster iterations. Bullet Core exemplifies what’s possible with Alchemist AI V2 - enabling anyone to bring complex games to life with just a simple description.

ALCHEMIST AI 🔮

35,814 просмотров • 1 год назад

So let me get this straight… Julie says she showed up at 34 Fairview around 8:00–8:30 AM, hung around for 30–45 minutes, just sitting in the kitchen of the house where a man supposedly died in the yard during a blizzard.Meanwhile… Her husband Chris says he woke up around 8:00–8:30 AM, totally on his own, like a Disney prince stretching in the sunshine, in the middle of a nor’easter, mind you. Then Julie strolls in, breaks the news that John is dead, and the two of them head back over to 34 Fairview “just after 9.” And they only stay a half hour before heading home again. Is this more Chris Albert Math?
2:04

So let me get this straight… Julie says she showed up at 34 Fairview around 8:00–8:30 AM, hung around for 30–45 minutes, just sitting in the kitchen of the house where a man supposedly died in the yard during a blizzard.Meanwhile… Her husband Chris says he woke up around 8:00–8:30 AM, totally on his own, like a Disney prince stretching in the sunshine, in the middle of a nor’easter, mind you. Then Julie strolls in, breaks the news that John is dead, and the two of them head back over to 34 Fairview “just after 9.” And they only stay a half hour before heading home again. Is this more Chris Albert Math?

Dixie Normus

271,479 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

While I've been hard at work on new Taito and Toaplan games, Pramod Somashekar and spent the month of December working on #Midway's Z/Y/T-Unit core and another surprise core... This is NARC running off of RAW power straight from the FPGA without a pseudo framebuffer in memory. NARC is medium resolution game running at 512x400 24KHz with a TMS34010, two M6809's, OPM, CVSD, and two AD7224 DAC's and it's the most demanding arcade core currently implemented! Thanks to those who pushed us to make our own framework. Our K-3 framework and modules for the #Analogue Pocket and #MiSTerFPGA have opened a whole realm of possibilities for new cores! We're just "heating up!"... Expect to see an updated Z/Y Unit core for subscribers the beginning of January and a few other unannounced projects from us both. #CoinOpCollection #PocketFPGA
6:58

While I've been hard at work on new Taito and Toaplan games, Pramod Somashekar and spent the month of December working on #Midway's Z/Y/T-Unit core and another surprise core... This is NARC running off of RAW power straight from the FPGA without a pseudo framebuffer in memory. NARC is medium resolution game running at 512x400 24KHz with a TMS34010, two M6809's, OPM, CVSD, and two AD7224 DAC's and it's the most demanding arcade core currently implemented! Thanks to those who pushed us to make our own framework. Our K-3 framework and modules for the #Analogue Pocket and #MiSTerFPGA have opened a whole realm of possibilities for new cores! We're just "heating up!"... Expect to see an updated Z/Y Unit core for subscribers the beginning of January and a few other unannounced projects from us both. #CoinOpCollection #PocketFPGA

atrac17

19,212 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

I wonder how long the people are gonna shamelessly defend Samsung all over :] The Galaxy S26 Ultra, which costs about 1500$ for the 512GB variant, might probably be the MOST EXPENSIVE Android in the 2026 as well... yet it can't even run the well optimized mainstream games on 60FPS for just 01 MINUTE... like for real man!‽ 😂 In the recent post where I posted the poor performance of S26 Ultra foe Wuthering Waves, people blamed the game... so here some gameplay test results from your so-called "MOST PERFECT, MOST OPTIMIZED" Hoyo games 🙂‍↕️ The FPS drops to avg 44-47 while just walking around in Genshin Impact after just playing for 4 or 6 minutes. The device completely crashes while playing Zenless Zone Zero at max settings and the FPS even drops to 27 during heavy combat... not in a long gaming session but it was a result of a 15min gameplay test 🥀 Now as for Wuthering Waves, yet it is the most hungry game among the mainstreams, yet the game is also getting slightly better at performance with each new patch update (not major version updates) While devices like IQOO 15 and POCO F8 Ultra with the same Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 are able to run the game for locked 60FPS for atleast 6mins, at the same session the S26 Ultra can't even reach 53FPS and the minimum it reaches during overworld battles is just 11FPS... crazy isn't it? 😂 Having a 200mp ai assisted camera and a so-called privacy display doesn't mean it's the best and has to be 1800$ while it can't even compete with a 450$ Chinese midrange smartphone at performance. Therefore now I guess why the Americans glaze with their IPhones over Samsung... welp, I've been also a Samsung user for 5 years and I still use one, but I don't think there's any of the devices that are more worthless than the S26 Ultra at its price point 😅 The only thing where Samsung is unbeatable might probably the official ui design and the customization features... which their devices are never made for gaming, but still their older devices delivered way more balanced performance at release. #WutheringWaves #WuWa #鳴潮 #WuWaCollection #WuWaAnniversary #GenshinImpact #Genshin #原神 #ZenlessZoneZero #アリア #ZZZ #SamsungGalaxyS26Ultra #zzzero
2:01

I wonder how long the people are gonna shamelessly defend Samsung all over :] The Galaxy S26 Ultra, which costs about 1500$ for the 512GB variant, might probably be the MOST EXPENSIVE Android in the 2026 as well... yet it can't even run the well optimized mainstream games on 60FPS for just 01 MINUTE... like for real man!‽ 😂 In the recent post where I posted the poor performance of S26 Ultra foe Wuthering Waves, people blamed the game... so here some gameplay test results from your so-called "MOST PERFECT, MOST OPTIMIZED" Hoyo games 🙂‍↕️ The FPS drops to avg 44-47 while just walking around in Genshin Impact after just playing for 4 or 6 minutes. The device completely crashes while playing Zenless Zone Zero at max settings and the FPS even drops to 27 during heavy combat... not in a long gaming session but it was a result of a 15min gameplay test 🥀 Now as for Wuthering Waves, yet it is the most hungry game among the mainstreams, yet the game is also getting slightly better at performance with each new patch update (not major version updates) While devices like IQOO 15 and POCO F8 Ultra with the same Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 are able to run the game for locked 60FPS for atleast 6mins, at the same session the S26 Ultra can't even reach 53FPS and the minimum it reaches during overworld battles is just 11FPS... crazy isn't it? 😂 Having a 200mp ai assisted camera and a so-called privacy display doesn't mean it's the best and has to be 1800$ while it can't even compete with a 450$ Chinese midrange smartphone at performance. Therefore now I guess why the Americans glaze with their IPhones over Samsung... welp, I've been also a Samsung user for 5 years and I still use one, but I don't think there's any of the devices that are more worthless than the S26 Ultra at its price point 😅 The only thing where Samsung is unbeatable might probably the official ui design and the customization features... which their devices are never made for gaming, but still their older devices delivered way more balanced performance at release. #WutheringWaves #WuWa #鳴潮 #WuWaCollection #WuWaAnniversary #GenshinImpact #Genshin #原神 #ZenlessZoneZero #アリア #ZZZ #SamsungGalaxyS26Ultra #zzzero

WuWa Timeline

86,998 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Core, ‌the Bitcoin-first ‌chain, and how it’s trying to stretch BTC’s usefulness Core DAO (Core DAO 🔶) brands itself as “The Bitcoin Everything Chain.” The pitch is simple: take Bitcoin’s strengths and push them beyond the usual buy-and-hold story. The protocol centers on one main idea: BTC shouldn’t sit still. Core wants idle Bitcoin to earn, but without giving up the properties people care about most: safety, decentralization, and full self-custody. To get there, Core leans on a mix of Satoshi Plus, timelocks, and a quick Layer 1 EVM chain. Satoshi Plus folds in Delegated Proof of Work (so Bitcoin miners can participate), self-custodial Bitcoin staking, and staking of the $CORE token. Core frames the relationship with Bitcoin as mutualistic. It borrows security and incentive alignment from Bitcoin, then tries to send value back through extra miner rewards, trustless yield opportunities for BTC holders, and infrastructure that makes it easier for Bitcoin products to plug in and scale. Key ways Core aims to expand Bitcoin utility: 1.) Self-custodial Bitcoin staking Lock BTC with timelocks directly on the Bitcoin network (CLTV) and earn CORE yield, no wrapping, no bridges, and no handing custody to anyone else. 2.) Dual staking Stake $BTC and $CORE together to reach higher yield tiers. 3.) Tapping Bitcoin’s hash power Miners can delegate hash power to earn extra CORE rewards, while Core itself is secured using a majority share of Bitcoin’s hash rate. 4.) The “Bitcoin Power Grid” A set of rails Bitcoin products can connect to, built around yield, collateral, payments, and DeFi use cases. 5.) Scalable Bitcoin DeFi An EVM-compatible network designed for faster, cheaper BTCFi apps. 6.) Two-way value flow The goal is to strengthen Bitcoin’s security budget over time, while also turning dormant BTC into something that can actively do work. In plain terms, Core DAO’s broader mission is to make Bitcoin more productive without piling on trust assumptions, converting energy and capital tied up in Bitcoin into yield, DeFi activity, and scalable infrastructure.
0:30

Core, ‌the Bitcoin-first ‌chain, and how it’s trying to stretch BTC’s usefulness Core DAO (Core DAO 🔶) brands itself as “The Bitcoin Everything Chain.” The pitch is simple: take Bitcoin’s strengths and push them beyond the usual buy-and-hold story. The protocol centers on one main idea: BTC shouldn’t sit still. Core wants idle Bitcoin to earn, but without giving up the properties people care about most: safety, decentralization, and full self-custody. To get there, Core leans on a mix of Satoshi Plus, timelocks, and a quick Layer 1 EVM chain. Satoshi Plus folds in Delegated Proof of Work (so Bitcoin miners can participate), self-custodial Bitcoin staking, and staking of the $CORE token. Core frames the relationship with Bitcoin as mutualistic. It borrows security and incentive alignment from Bitcoin, then tries to send value back through extra miner rewards, trustless yield opportunities for BTC holders, and infrastructure that makes it easier for Bitcoin products to plug in and scale. Key ways Core aims to expand Bitcoin utility: 1.) Self-custodial Bitcoin staking Lock BTC with timelocks directly on the Bitcoin network (CLTV) and earn CORE yield, no wrapping, no bridges, and no handing custody to anyone else. 2.) Dual staking Stake $BTC and $CORE together to reach higher yield tiers. 3.) Tapping Bitcoin’s hash power Miners can delegate hash power to earn extra CORE rewards, while Core itself is secured using a majority share of Bitcoin’s hash rate. 4.) The “Bitcoin Power Grid” A set of rails Bitcoin products can connect to, built around yield, collateral, payments, and DeFi use cases. 5.) Scalable Bitcoin DeFi An EVM-compatible network designed for faster, cheaper BTCFi apps. 6.) Two-way value flow The goal is to strengthen Bitcoin’s security budget over time, while also turning dormant BTC into something that can actively do work. In plain terms, Core DAO’s broader mission is to make Bitcoin more productive without piling on trust assumptions, converting energy and capital tied up in Bitcoin into yield, DeFi activity, and scalable infrastructure.

BSCN

27,446 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I saw the Huawei Pura X Max in person, and I actually like this form factor. I usually use my foldable phones for productivity (typing, photo editing, etc.) more than content consumption. But with this form factor, it is more suitable for content consumption, like watching movies or YouTube videos, for example. And I also love how compact it is compared to other book-style foldable phones. Now I'm also excited about the upcoming iPhone Fold and Galaxy Z Fold8 Wide if they have a similar form factor as this Huawei phone. If it had already been available to buy before my flight home, I would've bought this phone already.
0:33

I saw the Huawei Pura X Max in person, and I actually like this form factor. I usually use my foldable phones for productivity (typing, photo editing, etc.) more than content consumption. But with this form factor, it is more suitable for content consumption, like watching movies or YouTube videos, for example. And I also love how compact it is compared to other book-style foldable phones. Now I'm also excited about the upcoming iPhone Fold and Galaxy Z Fold8 Wide if they have a similar form factor as this Huawei phone. If it had already been available to buy before my flight home, I would've bought this phone already.

Alvin

39,940 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The Galaxy S26 Ultra display looks like absolute garbage next to the iQOO 16. Honestly, it looks like shit. The S26 Ultra uses M14 OLED, while the iQOO 16 has moved on to the newer M16 OLED, so the latter already has an advantage at the panel level. But the real disaster is Samsung’s privacy display design. Look at this comparison. The moment you tilt the S26 Ultra, the woman’s skin tone starts turning yellow and green. At wider angles, she almost looks like a ghost. Meanwhile, the iQOO 16 keeps her skin tone remarkably accurate, with excellent clarity and color consistency even from extreme angles. And please pay attention to this: I did NOT enable Privacy Display. This is the S26 Ultra in its normal display mode. The privacy feature is completely off, yet the viewing angles are already this bad. That means even if you never use Privacy Display at all, you still have to live with the side effects of this optical structure every single day. Tilt the phone a little and colors shift. Skin tones collapse. A flagship display that cannot even maintain basic color consistency at normal viewing angles is simply unacceptable. The first thing I checked after getting the iQOO 16 was its viewing angle performance, because this issue matters a lot to me. And honestly, I was so happy. This finally feels like a proper flagship OLED again. Then I looked back at my S26 Ultra and almost wanted to cry. Samsung has some of the best OLED technology in the world, and M14 OLED itself is perfectly capable of looking excellent. Yet Samsung sacrificed viewing angles, transparency, and color consistency for a privacy feature that most people will only use occasionally. Ruining hours of daily viewing quality for a feature you may need for a few minutes is absurd. I really hope other smartphone brands do not blindly copy this trend. Privacy protection can be achieved with software, accessories, or other solutions. Do not destroy the fundamentals of a great display for it. And this is exactly why I am already worried about the S27 Ultra. Even if Samsung upgrades it to M16 OLED, if it keeps the same privacy display structure, I do not expect it to match the clean, transparent, and consistent color performance of the iQOO 16. A great display should first get the basics right: accurate color, clarity, and viewing angles. If a normal human face turns yellow green the moment you tilt the phone, no advanced OLED material can save it.
1:41

The Galaxy S26 Ultra display looks like absolute garbage next to the iQOO 16. Honestly, it looks like shit. The S26 Ultra uses M14 OLED, while the iQOO 16 has moved on to the newer M16 OLED, so the latter already has an advantage at the panel level. But the real disaster is Samsung’s privacy display design. Look at this comparison. The moment you tilt the S26 Ultra, the woman’s skin tone starts turning yellow and green. At wider angles, she almost looks like a ghost. Meanwhile, the iQOO 16 keeps her skin tone remarkably accurate, with excellent clarity and color consistency even from extreme angles. And please pay attention to this: I did NOT enable Privacy Display. This is the S26 Ultra in its normal display mode. The privacy feature is completely off, yet the viewing angles are already this bad. That means even if you never use Privacy Display at all, you still have to live with the side effects of this optical structure every single day. Tilt the phone a little and colors shift. Skin tones collapse. A flagship display that cannot even maintain basic color consistency at normal viewing angles is simply unacceptable. The first thing I checked after getting the iQOO 16 was its viewing angle performance, because this issue matters a lot to me. And honestly, I was so happy. This finally feels like a proper flagship OLED again. Then I looked back at my S26 Ultra and almost wanted to cry. Samsung has some of the best OLED technology in the world, and M14 OLED itself is perfectly capable of looking excellent. Yet Samsung sacrificed viewing angles, transparency, and color consistency for a privacy feature that most people will only use occasionally. Ruining hours of daily viewing quality for a feature you may need for a few minutes is absurd. I really hope other smartphone brands do not blindly copy this trend. Privacy protection can be achieved with software, accessories, or other solutions. Do not destroy the fundamentals of a great display for it. And this is exactly why I am already worried about the S27 Ultra. Even if Samsung upgrades it to M16 OLED, if it keeps the same privacy display structure, I do not expect it to match the clean, transparent, and consistent color performance of the iQOO 16. A great display should first get the basics right: accurate color, clarity, and viewing angles. If a normal human face turns yellow green the moment you tilt the phone, no advanced OLED material can save it.

Ice Universe

378,876 просмотров • 15 дней назад