Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

The government has NO intention of undermining the vaccine program — EVER. It’s official policy, written into the Federal Register: "The science of vaccine safety — whatever its merits — if there is doubt about a vaccine, that science cannot be allowed to exist." ~Dr. Andrew Wakefield They don’t... show more

Valerie Anne Smith

259,616 subscribers

15,478 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Dr. Andy Wakefield shares with Alex Jones that a previous head of the FDA openly stated that information questioning vaccine safety cannot be allowed to circulate. “Let me read you this… this is a government document by the head of the FDA in the Federal Register.” “‘Any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives.’” “In other words, it doesn’t matter how good the science is questioning vaccine safety.” “It doesn’t matter how many children are injured or how seriously they’re injured.” “It cannot be allowed to exist because it’s not consistent with the government’s vaccine objectives.” Dr. Andy Wakefield Alex Jones

Dr. Andy Wakefield shares with Alex Jones that a previous head of the FDA openly stated that information questioning vaccine safety cannot be allowed to circulate. “Let me read you this… this is a government document by the head of the FDA in the Federal Register.” “‘Any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives.’” “In other words, it doesn’t matter how good the science is questioning vaccine safety.” “It doesn’t matter how many children are injured or how seriously they’re injured.” “It cannot be allowed to exist because it’s not consistent with the government’s vaccine objectives.” Dr. Andy Wakefield Alex Jones

Children’s Health Defense

41,473 views • 8 months ago

Dr. Andy Wakefield: A U.S. Government Document Once Declared That “Criticism of the Vaccine Cannot Be Allowed to Exist.” That line, buried deep in the Federal Register years ago, stopped Dr. Andy Wakefield cold. It was about the polio vaccine—but it revealed something much darker. The U.S. government had written, in plain language, that any evidence—no matter how rigorous, honest, or true—must not be allowed to exist if it questions the vaccine. For Wakefield, that was the moment the illusion shattered. The moment he saw that the battle wasn’t scientific—it was political, ideological, total. “That is the matrix,” he said. “The world they allow you to see. Anything that challenges it must be erased.” That realization chilled him. As a scientist, he realized it meant the end of open inquiry. The death of debate. The rise of control disguised as consensus. A system that forbids questions isn’t defending public health—it’s defending power.

Dr. Andy Wakefield: A U.S. Government Document Once Declared That “Criticism of the Vaccine Cannot Be Allowed to Exist.” That line, buried deep in the Federal Register years ago, stopped Dr. Andy Wakefield cold. It was about the polio vaccine—but it revealed something much darker. The U.S. government had written, in plain language, that any evidence—no matter how rigorous, honest, or true—must not be allowed to exist if it questions the vaccine. For Wakefield, that was the moment the illusion shattered. The moment he saw that the battle wasn’t scientific—it was political, ideological, total. “That is the matrix,” he said. “The world they allow you to see. Anything that challenges it must be erased.” That realization chilled him. As a scientist, he realized it meant the end of open inquiry. The death of debate. The rise of control disguised as consensus. A system that forbids questions isn’t defending public health—it’s defending power.

Camus

95,031 views • 9 months ago

Dr. Suzanne: “The [Hep B] vaccine is given in infancy and there has been no evaluation of its effect on mortality on young children.” “Once a vaccine is licensed, you’re not allowed to do trials … because it’s considered unethical.” 🚩 Then why was the Hep B vaccine ever put on the childhood schedule? Dr Suzanne Humphries

Dr. Suzanne: “The [Hep B] vaccine is given in infancy and there has been no evaluation of its effect on mortality on young children.” “Once a vaccine is licensed, you’re not allowed to do trials … because it’s considered unethical.” 🚩 Then why was the Hep B vaccine ever put on the childhood schedule? Dr Suzanne Humphries

Children’s Health Defense

26,426 views • 2 months ago

Dr. Andrew Wakefield exposes the Simpsonwood scandal, "a highly secret meeting between representatives of federal agencies and vaccine experts to cover up the fact that they had discovered a highly significant link between... the hepatitis B vaccine and autism". "It was not only a threat to the vaccine, but of more concern to the authorities—to the vaccine manufacturers, to the regulators. It was a threat to them. It was a threat to their credibility." "And what they did then was to fudge the data, to take out the comparison unvaccinated group, and to present the data as saying that there is no link between thimerosal and autism." "Then they went on, obviously, to remove [the hepatitis B vaccine] slowly... It should have come out immediately from that point. But thousands, millions more children were put at risk of serious permanent neurological injury in the form of autism and related disorders." "And it was all done not to protect the children... It was done to protect the reputations and the credibility of the vaccine regulators. And that is utterly appalling." Credit: Dr. Andy Wakefield Children’s Health Defense

Dr. Andrew Wakefield exposes the Simpsonwood scandal, "a highly secret meeting between representatives of federal agencies and vaccine experts to cover up the fact that they had discovered a highly significant link between... the hepatitis B vaccine and autism". "It was not only a threat to the vaccine, but of more concern to the authorities—to the vaccine manufacturers, to the regulators. It was a threat to them. It was a threat to their credibility." "And what they did then was to fudge the data, to take out the comparison unvaccinated group, and to present the data as saying that there is no link between thimerosal and autism." "Then they went on, obviously, to remove [the hepatitis B vaccine] slowly... It should have come out immediately from that point. But thousands, millions more children were put at risk of serious permanent neurological injury in the form of autism and related disorders." "And it was all done not to protect the children... It was done to protect the reputations and the credibility of the vaccine regulators. And that is utterly appalling." Credit: Dr. Andy Wakefield Children’s Health Defense

Wide Awake Media

155,621 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Brian Hooker says mainstream outlets refuse to criticize the MMR vaccine because doing so would mean admitting Andy Wakefield was right. “They don’t want to know.” “They do not want to say anything incriminating about the MMR vaccine because then they will be Andy Wakefield and that is a fate worse than death.” Brian Hooker, PhD Steve Kirsch Vaccine Safety Research Foundation

Dr. Brian Hooker says mainstream outlets refuse to criticize the MMR vaccine because doing so would mean admitting Andy Wakefield was right. “They don’t want to know.” “They do not want to say anything incriminating about the MMR vaccine because then they will be Andy Wakefield and that is a fate worse than death.” Brian Hooker, PhD Steve Kirsch Vaccine Safety Research Foundation

Children’s Health Defense

23,151 views • 8 months ago

Russell Brand says much of science has become illegitimate because it is driven by profit. “All of us have been now recently exposed to the total illegitimacy of science.” “We all know that only profitable experimentation is being undertaken.” “Who’s doing and conducting the experiments to demonstrate absolutely that there is no causal link between the childhood vaccine program and the rise in autism?” “Who’s going to pay for that?” “Vaccine manufacturers… The government… and then that’s the end of the list.” “No one else can afford to.” Russell Brand Tucker Carlson

End Tribalism in Politics

28,608 views • 4 months ago

Del Bigtree EXPOSED a study that found children who received the DTP vaccine had up to 5x higher all-cause mortality than children without it. "A very pro-vaccine scientist... looked after 30 years at the health outcomes from his study." "Lo and behold, the kids who got his DTP vaccine program died at 2.5-5 times the rate as those that didn't receive it." "They didn't die of pertussis. They didn't die of tetanus. The vaccine did its job." "But it obviously did something to the immune system that made them more vulnerable to other issues in their environment." "No one ever looked at all-cause mortality." "No one would ever know if he hadn't done that study.”

Del Bigtree EXPOSED a study that found children who received the DTP vaccine had up to 5x higher all-cause mortality than children without it. "A very pro-vaccine scientist... looked after 30 years at the health outcomes from his study." "Lo and behold, the kids who got his DTP vaccine program died at 2.5-5 times the rate as those that didn't receive it." "They didn't die of pertussis. They didn't die of tetanus. The vaccine did its job." "But it obviously did something to the immune system that made them more vulnerable to other issues in their environment." "No one ever looked at all-cause mortality." "No one would ever know if he hadn't done that study.”

Children’s Health Defense

23,695 views • 7 months ago

Dr. Andrew Wakefield exposes critical flaws in vaccine safety assumptions in a riveting discussion with Dr. Paul Marik. "The cumulative toxic load from multiple vaccines is very important," Wakefield asserts, pointing to the staggering 70+ vaccines, many with adjuvants, that children receive today. He emphasizes the need to listen to parents who report their children regressing shortly after receiving the MMR vaccine. "Is MMR the straw that breaks the camel’s back?" Wakefield asks, stressing that the science to investigate this should have been done long ago. He proposes a robust study comparing single vaccines, spaced adequately apart, against the combined MMR, including an unvaccinated control group—a study that should have been conducted from the start. Shockingly, Wakefield recounts a conversation with Dr. David Salisbury, then-UK Director of Vaccination Policy, who admitted no safety comparison between single and triple vaccines was ever done because "we had no reason to assume it would be a problem." Wakefield’s response is scathing: "You do NOT assume. You do not make assumptions on behalf of every child in the UK and, by proxy, the world, because it’s inconvenient to find an association." This "kindergarten thinking" in public health, Wakefield warns, mirrors the reckless assumption that the COVID vaccine would remain at the injection site—only to later discover it spreads throughout the body after targeting billions. The failure to rigorously test vaccine safety has led us to an "unhappy pass," he laments. It’s time to demand accountability and proper science. Listen to parents. Stop assuming. Start studying. The health of our children depends on it.

Dr. Andrew Wakefield exposes critical flaws in vaccine safety assumptions in a riveting discussion with Dr. Paul Marik. "The cumulative toxic load from multiple vaccines is very important," Wakefield asserts, pointing to the staggering 70+ vaccines, many with adjuvants, that children receive today. He emphasizes the need to listen to parents who report their children regressing shortly after receiving the MMR vaccine. "Is MMR the straw that breaks the camel’s back?" Wakefield asks, stressing that the science to investigate this should have been done long ago. He proposes a robust study comparing single vaccines, spaced adequately apart, against the combined MMR, including an unvaccinated control group—a study that should have been conducted from the start. Shockingly, Wakefield recounts a conversation with Dr. David Salisbury, then-UK Director of Vaccination Policy, who admitted no safety comparison between single and triple vaccines was ever done because "we had no reason to assume it would be a problem." Wakefield’s response is scathing: "You do NOT assume. You do not make assumptions on behalf of every child in the UK and, by proxy, the world, because it’s inconvenient to find an association." This "kindergarten thinking" in public health, Wakefield warns, mirrors the reckless assumption that the COVID vaccine would remain at the injection site—only to later discover it spreads throughout the body after targeting billions. The failure to rigorously test vaccine safety has led us to an "unhappy pass," he laments. It’s time to demand accountability and proper science. Listen to parents. Stop assuming. Start studying. The health of our children depends on it.

Camus

49,483 views • 1 year ago

Rand Paul just laid out the facts about Covid and Hepatitis B shots for children. “There is no indication for your child to take a Covid vaccine.” “There’s no indication for your newborn to take a Hepatitis B vaccine if the mom doesn’t have Hepatitis.” “These are facts that are absolute — the science is so solid that we should make it the forefront of what we talk about.”

Rand Paul just laid out the facts about Covid and Hepatitis B shots for children. “There is no indication for your child to take a Covid vaccine.” “There’s no indication for your newborn to take a Hepatitis B vaccine if the mom doesn’t have Hepatitis.” “These are facts that are absolute — the science is so solid that we should make it the forefront of what we talk about.”

Children’s Health Defense

54,132 views • 10 months ago

Cheryl Hines broke down to Tim Dillon why talking about vaccine safety isn’t anti-vaccine — it’s about accountability and honesty. “There is a vaccine injury compensation program that has paid out $5.4 billion to vaccine injuries, but people probably haven’t heard about it.” “Maybe that’s a problem.” “Maybe we could do better with the vaccines.” “Maybe they could be safer.” “Bobby is saying that, but some people don’t even want to hear that or agree with it.” “But those are just facts.”

Cheryl Hines broke down to Tim Dillon why talking about vaccine safety isn’t anti-vaccine — it’s about accountability and honesty. “There is a vaccine injury compensation program that has paid out $5.4 billion to vaccine injuries, but people probably haven’t heard about it.” “Maybe that’s a problem.” “Maybe we could do better with the vaccines.” “Maybe they could be safer.” “Bobby is saying that, but some people don’t even want to hear that or agree with it.” “But those are just facts.”

MAHA Action

12,859 views • 9 months ago

COVID Vaccine Myocarditis: What You Aren’t Being Told Dr. McCullough breaks down new mortality data tied to vaccine-induced myocarditis — showing that the condition isn’t “mild.” The science speaks clearly: the risk is real, and lives have been lost. 👉 Help us bring transparency and protect patients. Donate: Credit: Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF) with Vaccine Safety Research Foundation #MedicalFreedom

COVID Vaccine Myocarditis: What You Aren’t Being Told Dr. McCullough breaks down new mortality data tied to vaccine-induced myocarditis — showing that the condition isn’t “mild.” The science speaks clearly: the risk is real, and lives have been lost. 👉 Help us bring transparency and protect patients. Donate: Credit: Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF) with Vaccine Safety Research Foundation #MedicalFreedom

McCullough Foundation

26,079 views • 10 months ago

The Unethical Circle of Vaccine Science, Exposed by Its Own Architects. A stunning admission is playing out in plain sight. Former FDA Chief and Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb is making his second media tour, laser-focused on one thing: stopping RFK Jr. from linking the aluminum adjuvant in vaccines to autism. Why such intense, specific concern from a man at the very heart of the pharmaceutical industry? The reason reveals an unforgivable flaw at the foundation of modern vaccine science. As highlighted in recent hearings, there has never been a placebo-controlled safety study on injected aluminum adjuvants. You will not find a study where one group gets aluminum and another gets saline. The official reason? It would be "unethical." Think about that. It's "unethical" to test the safety of a substance they have been injecting into billions of people, including children, for decades. Why is it unethical? Because aluminum is not a vitamin. It's a neurotoxicant with no beneficial role in the human body. Injecting it purely for a safety trial would offer the subject no benefit, only potential harm. Therefore, it's illegal. So let's state this clearly: 1. They admit it's unethical to inject aluminum to study its harm. 2. Yet, they have no ethical problem making it a "core ingredient" in almost every childhood vaccine. This is the indefensible circle: They never did the safety trial to establish a baseline of harm. They can't do it now because it would be unethical. But they continue to mandate the product. And Gottlieb’s own quote says it all: "If you take out aluminum, you'll destroy the whole vaccine program." That is the entire problem in one sentence. The program depends on an ingredient whose standalone safety has never been—and can ethically never be—established. This isn't conspiracy. This is the admission of a former FDA chief. The conversation has moved from "safe and effective" to "too big to fail." Where is the transparent science?

The Unethical Circle of Vaccine Science, Exposed by Its Own Architects. A stunning admission is playing out in plain sight. Former FDA Chief and Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb is making his second media tour, laser-focused on one thing: stopping RFK Jr. from linking the aluminum adjuvant in vaccines to autism. Why such intense, specific concern from a man at the very heart of the pharmaceutical industry? The reason reveals an unforgivable flaw at the foundation of modern vaccine science. As highlighted in recent hearings, there has never been a placebo-controlled safety study on injected aluminum adjuvants. You will not find a study where one group gets aluminum and another gets saline. The official reason? It would be "unethical." Think about that. It's "unethical" to test the safety of a substance they have been injecting into billions of people, including children, for decades. Why is it unethical? Because aluminum is not a vitamin. It's a neurotoxicant with no beneficial role in the human body. Injecting it purely for a safety trial would offer the subject no benefit, only potential harm. Therefore, it's illegal. So let's state this clearly: 1. They admit it's unethical to inject aluminum to study its harm. 2. Yet, they have no ethical problem making it a "core ingredient" in almost every childhood vaccine. This is the indefensible circle: They never did the safety trial to establish a baseline of harm. They can't do it now because it would be unethical. But they continue to mandate the product. And Gottlieb’s own quote says it all: "If you take out aluminum, you'll destroy the whole vaccine program." That is the entire problem in one sentence. The program depends on an ingredient whose standalone safety has never been—and can ethically never be—established. This isn't conspiracy. This is the admission of a former FDA chief. The conversation has moved from "safe and effective" to "too big to fail." Where is the transparent science?

Camus

33,188 views • 11 months ago

"No Vaccine Is Safe, Never Has There Been a Safe Vaccine And Never Will There Be One" - Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "The process of vaccination defies the natural function of the immune system; Vaccinated people are among the sickest They think a baby’s immune system is flawed, their answer is to inject 24 different diseases into a baby by 24 weeks, multiple times Our children are suffering from more allergies, illness and diseases than ever before due to their barbaric vaccine agenda"

"No Vaccine Is Safe, Never Has There Been a Safe Vaccine And Never Will There Be One" - Dr. Suzanne Humphries: "The process of vaccination defies the natural function of the immune system; Vaccinated people are among the sickest They think a baby’s immune system is flawed, their answer is to inject 24 different diseases into a baby by 24 weeks, multiple times Our children are suffering from more allergies, illness and diseases than ever before due to their barbaric vaccine agenda"

Robin Monotti

466,403 views • 1 year ago

“Unless you're comparing a vaccine against saline, how can you say it’s safe?” Dr. Sherri Tenpenny just exposed Pharma’s “safe and effective” narrative as a complete sham. “There has never been—on any one of the vaccines that are currently given—a truly placebo-controlled trial where in one set of children they were given the new vaccine, and then the other set of children it was a true saline placebo.” “All of the vaccine trials are a vaccine compared to another vaccine,” Alex Clark: “How long were the majority of the safety trials done on the vaccines on the childhood schedule?” Dr. Tenpenny: “The average length of time is probably somewhere between 15 and 30 days.” “It’s been as short as 4 days.” “When they brought the first hepatitis B vaccine to market, they followed to see if there were any side effects for 5 days.” “The second hepatitis B vaccine that came to market, they followed side effects for 4 days.” “That is not a safety trial.” “It can take months to years to develop autoimmune diseases, neurological complications, other types of things like [gastrointestinal] disorders.” “Encephalitis can start right away, but it can be slow brewing for a long period of time.” Dr Sherri Tenpenny

“Unless you're comparing a vaccine against saline, how can you say it’s safe?” Dr. Sherri Tenpenny just exposed Pharma’s “safe and effective” narrative as a complete sham. “There has never been—on any one of the vaccines that are currently given—a truly placebo-controlled trial where in one set of children they were given the new vaccine, and then the other set of children it was a true saline placebo.” “All of the vaccine trials are a vaccine compared to another vaccine,” Alex Clark: “How long were the majority of the safety trials done on the vaccines on the childhood schedule?” Dr. Tenpenny: “The average length of time is probably somewhere between 15 and 30 days.” “It’s been as short as 4 days.” “When they brought the first hepatitis B vaccine to market, they followed to see if there were any side effects for 5 days.” “The second hepatitis B vaccine that came to market, they followed side effects for 4 days.” “That is not a safety trial.” “It can take months to years to develop autoimmune diseases, neurological complications, other types of things like [gastrointestinal] disorders.” “Encephalitis can start right away, but it can be slow brewing for a long period of time.” Dr Sherri Tenpenny

Children’s Health Defense

49,833 views • 8 months ago