Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Dr. Andy Wakefield: A U.S. Government Document Once Declared That “Criticism of the Vaccine Cannot Be Allowed to Exist.” That line, buried deep in the Federal Register years ago, stopped Dr. Andy Wakefield cold. It was about the polio vaccine—but it revealed something much darker. The U.S. government had...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

449,984 subscribers

95,031 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Dr. Andy Wakefield shares with Alex Jones that a previous head of the FDA openly stated that information questioning vaccine safety cannot be allowed to circulate. “Let me read you this… this is a government document by the head of the FDA in the Federal Register.” “‘Any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives.’” “In other words, it doesn’t matter how good the science is questioning vaccine safety.” “It doesn’t matter how many children are injured or how seriously they’re injured.” “It cannot be allowed to exist because it’s not consistent with the government’s vaccine objectives.” Dr. Andy Wakefield Alex Jones
1:16

Dr. Andy Wakefield shares with Alex Jones that a previous head of the FDA openly stated that information questioning vaccine safety cannot be allowed to circulate. “Let me read you this… this is a government document by the head of the FDA in the Federal Register.” “‘Any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives.’” “In other words, it doesn’t matter how good the science is questioning vaccine safety.” “It doesn’t matter how many children are injured or how seriously they’re injured.” “It cannot be allowed to exist because it’s not consistent with the government’s vaccine objectives.” Dr. Andy Wakefield Alex Jones

Children’s Health Defense

41,473 views • 9 months ago

The government has NO intention of undermining the vaccine program — EVER. It’s official policy, written into the Federal Register: "The science of vaccine safety — whatever its merits — if there is doubt about a vaccine, that science cannot be allowed to exist." ~Dr. Andrew Wakefield They don’t study the risks. They bury them. Your children are being sacrificed to protect the program.
1:25

The government has NO intention of undermining the vaccine program — EVER. It’s official policy, written into the Federal Register: "The science of vaccine safety — whatever its merits — if there is doubt about a vaccine, that science cannot be allowed to exist." ~Dr. Andrew Wakefield They don’t study the risks. They bury them. Your children are being sacrificed to protect the program.

Valerie Anne Smith

15,478 views • 3 months ago

Dr. Andrew Wakefield exposes the Simpsonwood scandal, "a highly secret meeting between representatives of federal agencies and vaccine experts to cover up the fact that they had discovered a highly significant link between... the hepatitis B vaccine and autism". "It was not only a threat to the vaccine, but of more concern to the authorities—to the vaccine manufacturers, to the regulators. It was a threat to them. It was a threat to their credibility." "And what they did then was to fudge the data, to take out the comparison unvaccinated group, and to present the data as saying that there is no link between thimerosal and autism." "Then they went on, obviously, to remove [the hepatitis B vaccine] slowly... It should have come out immediately from that point. But thousands, millions more children were put at risk of serious permanent neurological injury in the form of autism and related disorders." "And it was all done not to protect the children... It was done to protect the reputations and the credibility of the vaccine regulators. And that is utterly appalling." Credit: Dr. Andy Wakefield Children’s Health Defense
2:06

Dr. Andrew Wakefield exposes the Simpsonwood scandal, "a highly secret meeting between representatives of federal agencies and vaccine experts to cover up the fact that they had discovered a highly significant link between... the hepatitis B vaccine and autism". "It was not only a threat to the vaccine, but of more concern to the authorities—to the vaccine manufacturers, to the regulators. It was a threat to them. It was a threat to their credibility." "And what they did then was to fudge the data, to take out the comparison unvaccinated group, and to present the data as saying that there is no link between thimerosal and autism." "Then they went on, obviously, to remove [the hepatitis B vaccine] slowly... It should have come out immediately from that point. But thousands, millions more children were put at risk of serious permanent neurological injury in the form of autism and related disorders." "And it was all done not to protect the children... It was done to protect the reputations and the credibility of the vaccine regulators. And that is utterly appalling." Credit: Dr. Andy Wakefield Children’s Health Defense

Wide Awake Media

155,621 views • 1 year ago

The troubling history of the MMR vaccine ⬇️ We’ve been told to “trust the science,” but the vaccine industry’s fair share of troubling incidents surrounding vaccines doesn’t instill much faith in the public. For decades, manufacturers of the MMR vaccine continued giving versions of their vaccine they knew were injuring people, as Dr Suzanne Humphries points out. “The vaccine that came in 1963 was a formalin-inactivated vaccine and it caused such horrible, disastrous problems that it was often injected alongside of immune serum globulin. And then they made a vaccine after that that was a live viral vaccine, but it wasn't attenuated, it wasn't dampened down. And so it was causing basically measles in people.”
1:31

The troubling history of the MMR vaccine ⬇️ We’ve been told to “trust the science,” but the vaccine industry’s fair share of troubling incidents surrounding vaccines doesn’t instill much faith in the public. For decades, manufacturers of the MMR vaccine continued giving versions of their vaccine they knew were injuring people, as Dr Suzanne Humphries points out. “The vaccine that came in 1963 was a formalin-inactivated vaccine and it caused such horrible, disastrous problems that it was often injected alongside of immune serum globulin. And then they made a vaccine after that that was a live viral vaccine, but it wasn't attenuated, it wasn't dampened down. And so it was causing basically measles in people.”

Children’s Health Defense

13,035 views • 1 year ago

The lawyer targeted by the New York Times debunks false claims about RFK Jr. and the polio vaccine. “It's totally false to say that the petition sought to revoke the polio vaccine as if the petition intended to make it so that Americans couldn't get the polio vaccine. It was for only one of 6 licensed polio vaccines.” “It was filed on behalf of a client of our firm, not on behalf of RFK Jr. It had nothing to do with him. Never spoke to him about it. It was for a new polio vaccine, not the polio vaccines of old.” “The clinical trial relied upon to license that vaccine reviewed safety for only 3 days after licensure. That's what the FDA documents say before it was licensed.” “They are insinuating that RFK Jr. wants to get rid of the polio vaccine altogether. He doesn't wanna get rid of any vaccines. Mr. Kennedy has made very clear. He just wants to make sure that there's transparency and that there's proper science.” “Any American, even if the petition was granted, that wanted to get a vaccine and an adult could get it, children would have been able to get vaccinated. The idea that it was going to deprive the children or adults from vaccination is just untrue.” “The New York Times has yet to issue a correction, though I gotta tell you I'm not surprised.”
2:47

The lawyer targeted by the New York Times debunks false claims about RFK Jr. and the polio vaccine. “It's totally false to say that the petition sought to revoke the polio vaccine as if the petition intended to make it so that Americans couldn't get the polio vaccine. It was for only one of 6 licensed polio vaccines.” “It was filed on behalf of a client of our firm, not on behalf of RFK Jr. It had nothing to do with him. Never spoke to him about it. It was for a new polio vaccine, not the polio vaccines of old.” “The clinical trial relied upon to license that vaccine reviewed safety for only 3 days after licensure. That's what the FDA documents say before it was licensed.” “They are insinuating that RFK Jr. wants to get rid of the polio vaccine altogether. He doesn't wanna get rid of any vaccines. Mr. Kennedy has made very clear. He just wants to make sure that there's transparency and that there's proper science.” “Any American, even if the petition was granted, that wanted to get a vaccine and an adult could get it, children would have been able to get vaccinated. The idea that it was going to deprive the children or adults from vaccination is just untrue.” “The New York Times has yet to issue a correction, though I gotta tell you I'm not surprised.”

End Tribalism in Politics

26,414 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Andy Wakefield was attacked like no other scientist in history for questioning vaccines. Now, President Trump and RFK Jr. have shown he was right — and Wakefield says the fight for children’s health must continue. “For three decades, I’ve stood by the principle that we must protect our children by questioning a vaccine schedule that has grown unchecked and untested.” “President Trump announced a sweeping plan to reform the childhood vaccine schedule. And he did it by adopting the very recommendation I made back in 1998.” “That includes splitting the MMR vaccine into individual measles, mumps, and rubella shots… delaying the hepatitis B vaccine until age 12… removing mercury and aluminum… spacing out vaccines… and eliminating Tylenol use around vaccination.” “For the millions of parents whose children were injured, ignored, gaslit, and shamed — this is vindication. But more importantly, it’s hope.” “This is about being pro-safety, pro-transparency, and pro-child — and particularly pro the right of parents to choose on behalf of their children.” “The autism epidemic is real — and it’s time we confronted it with honesty.” Dr. Andy Wakefield
1:56

Dr. Andy Wakefield was attacked like no other scientist in history for questioning vaccines. Now, President Trump and RFK Jr. have shown he was right — and Wakefield says the fight for children’s health must continue. “For three decades, I’ve stood by the principle that we must protect our children by questioning a vaccine schedule that has grown unchecked and untested.” “President Trump announced a sweeping plan to reform the childhood vaccine schedule. And he did it by adopting the very recommendation I made back in 1998.” “That includes splitting the MMR vaccine into individual measles, mumps, and rubella shots… delaying the hepatitis B vaccine until age 12… removing mercury and aluminum… spacing out vaccines… and eliminating Tylenol use around vaccination.” “For the millions of parents whose children were injured, ignored, gaslit, and shamed — this is vindication. But more importantly, it’s hope.” “This is about being pro-safety, pro-transparency, and pro-child — and particularly pro the right of parents to choose on behalf of their children.” “The autism epidemic is real — and it’s time we confronted it with honesty.” Dr. Andy Wakefield

Children’s Health Defense

189,567 views • 1 year ago

In a revealing exchange, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dismantles the core argument of the pro-vaccine establishment, exposing a critical logical fallacy they rely on: the appeal to authority. He challenges any official from the CDC, FDA, or doctors like Paul Offit to produce a single scientific study that proves the flu vaccine saves more lives than it costs. He states unequivocally, "You cannot show me that study." While conceding that not every CDC study should be discarded and that vaccines have helped eradicate certain diseases, Kennedy's central demand remains: For each vaccine, the public must be shown independent, peer-reviewed studies that conclusively prove the intervention averts more harm than it causes. He argues that the authorities simply assert "no linkage" to harms like autism without providing the rigorous science to back it up. This is not an argument to be dismissed as "anti-vax." It is a call for the transparency and rigorous science that the public deserves but is consistently denied. The burden of proof lies with those mandating the products.
3:03

In a revealing exchange, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dismantles the core argument of the pro-vaccine establishment, exposing a critical logical fallacy they rely on: the appeal to authority. He challenges any official from the CDC, FDA, or doctors like Paul Offit to produce a single scientific study that proves the flu vaccine saves more lives than it costs. He states unequivocally, "You cannot show me that study." While conceding that not every CDC study should be discarded and that vaccines have helped eradicate certain diseases, Kennedy's central demand remains: For each vaccine, the public must be shown independent, peer-reviewed studies that conclusively prove the intervention averts more harm than it causes. He argues that the authorities simply assert "no linkage" to harms like autism without providing the rigorous science to back it up. This is not an argument to be dismissed as "anti-vax." It is a call for the transparency and rigorous science that the public deserves but is consistently denied. The burden of proof lies with those mandating the products.

Camus

115,524 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Brian Hooker says mainstream outlets refuse to criticize the MMR vaccine because doing so would mean admitting Andy Wakefield was right. “They don’t want to know.” “They do not want to say anything incriminating about the MMR vaccine because then they will be Andy Wakefield and that is a fate worse than death.” Brian Hooker, PhD Steve Kirsch Vaccine Safety Research Foundation
0:42

Dr. Brian Hooker says mainstream outlets refuse to criticize the MMR vaccine because doing so would mean admitting Andy Wakefield was right. “They don’t want to know.” “They do not want to say anything incriminating about the MMR vaccine because then they will be Andy Wakefield and that is a fate worse than death.” Brian Hooker, PhD Steve Kirsch Vaccine Safety Research Foundation

Children’s Health Defense

23,151 views • 9 months ago

Dr. Wakefield reveals evidence that combination vaccines are the “most significant modifiable risk factor for autism.” And he commended RFK Jr’s changes to the CDC vaccine schedule—but called for an END to ALL mandates. “Years ago, all I recommended … was that further research should be done.” “The further research has now been done.” “Here’s a paper by Nic Hulscher and Peter McCullough’s group.” “This is the latest findings, 136 papers that purport to look at this issue, and here’s the conclusion of the paper: combination and early-time routine childhood vaccination constitutes the most significant modifiable risk factor for autism.” “In other words, it’s preventable, a modifiable risk factor—combination vaccines.” “I commend Bobby’s team for making much needed adjustments to the schedule.” “But in the end, it must be voluntary. It must be based on fully informed parental consent to vaccination, knowing all of the risks and all of the benefits that are available to us.” “It cannot be through coercion, bribery, bullying, or diktat by public health authorities.” Nicolas Hulscher, MPH Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® Dr. Andy Wakefield
1:48

Dr. Wakefield reveals evidence that combination vaccines are the “most significant modifiable risk factor for autism.” And he commended RFK Jr’s changes to the CDC vaccine schedule—but called for an END to ALL mandates. “Years ago, all I recommended … was that further research should be done.” “The further research has now been done.” “Here’s a paper by Nic Hulscher and Peter McCullough’s group.” “This is the latest findings, 136 papers that purport to look at this issue, and here’s the conclusion of the paper: combination and early-time routine childhood vaccination constitutes the most significant modifiable risk factor for autism.” “In other words, it’s preventable, a modifiable risk factor—combination vaccines.” “I commend Bobby’s team for making much needed adjustments to the schedule.” “But in the end, it must be voluntary. It must be based on fully informed parental consent to vaccination, knowing all of the risks and all of the benefits that are available to us.” “It cannot be through coercion, bribery, bullying, or diktat by public health authorities.” Nicolas Hulscher, MPH Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® Dr. Andy Wakefield

Children’s Health Defense

41,369 views • 8 months ago

Dr. Andy Wakefield says he’s deeply concerned about what we’ve done by inoculating the entire population with imperfect vaccines. He warns it could drive new viral mutations — and that we’ve lost faith in nature’s ability to protect us. “We saw this with COVID, when you introduce a vaccine that’s imperfect, you put a genetic selection pressure on the virus to mutate and adapt — and you’ll get the emergence of new strains.” “Pfizer saw that as a tremendous market potential, generating new vaccine after new vaccine, chasing the virus to cover the strains they helped create.” “So are we now going to see the emergence of more dangerous strains of measles precisely as a consequence of vaccination policy?” “My personal opinion is that we need to invest our trust in nature and allow that decline in mortality and seriousness of disease to play out naturally.” Dr. Andy Wakefield
1:56

Dr. Andy Wakefield says he’s deeply concerned about what we’ve done by inoculating the entire population with imperfect vaccines. He warns it could drive new viral mutations — and that we’ve lost faith in nature’s ability to protect us. “We saw this with COVID, when you introduce a vaccine that’s imperfect, you put a genetic selection pressure on the virus to mutate and adapt — and you’ll get the emergence of new strains.” “Pfizer saw that as a tremendous market potential, generating new vaccine after new vaccine, chasing the virus to cover the strains they helped create.” “So are we now going to see the emergence of more dangerous strains of measles precisely as a consequence of vaccination policy?” “My personal opinion is that we need to invest our trust in nature and allow that decline in mortality and seriousness of disease to play out naturally.” Dr. Andy Wakefield

Children’s Health Defense

88,063 views • 11 months ago

Dr. Andrew Wakefield exposes critical flaws in vaccine safety assumptions in a riveting discussion with Dr. Paul Marik. "The cumulative toxic load from multiple vaccines is very important," Wakefield asserts, pointing to the staggering 70+ vaccines, many with adjuvants, that children receive today. He emphasizes the need to listen to parents who report their children regressing shortly after receiving the MMR vaccine. "Is MMR the straw that breaks the camel’s back?" Wakefield asks, stressing that the science to investigate this should have been done long ago. He proposes a robust study comparing single vaccines, spaced adequately apart, against the combined MMR, including an unvaccinated control group—a study that should have been conducted from the start. Shockingly, Wakefield recounts a conversation with Dr. David Salisbury, then-UK Director of Vaccination Policy, who admitted no safety comparison between single and triple vaccines was ever done because "we had no reason to assume it would be a problem." Wakefield’s response is scathing: "You do NOT assume. You do not make assumptions on behalf of every child in the UK and, by proxy, the world, because it’s inconvenient to find an association." This "kindergarten thinking" in public health, Wakefield warns, mirrors the reckless assumption that the COVID vaccine would remain at the injection site—only to later discover it spreads throughout the body after targeting billions. The failure to rigorously test vaccine safety has led us to an "unhappy pass," he laments. It’s time to demand accountability and proper science. Listen to parents. Stop assuming. Start studying. The health of our children depends on it.
3:17

Dr. Andrew Wakefield exposes critical flaws in vaccine safety assumptions in a riveting discussion with Dr. Paul Marik. "The cumulative toxic load from multiple vaccines is very important," Wakefield asserts, pointing to the staggering 70+ vaccines, many with adjuvants, that children receive today. He emphasizes the need to listen to parents who report their children regressing shortly after receiving the MMR vaccine. "Is MMR the straw that breaks the camel’s back?" Wakefield asks, stressing that the science to investigate this should have been done long ago. He proposes a robust study comparing single vaccines, spaced adequately apart, against the combined MMR, including an unvaccinated control group—a study that should have been conducted from the start. Shockingly, Wakefield recounts a conversation with Dr. David Salisbury, then-UK Director of Vaccination Policy, who admitted no safety comparison between single and triple vaccines was ever done because "we had no reason to assume it would be a problem." Wakefield’s response is scathing: "You do NOT assume. You do not make assumptions on behalf of every child in the UK and, by proxy, the world, because it’s inconvenient to find an association." This "kindergarten thinking" in public health, Wakefield warns, mirrors the reckless assumption that the COVID vaccine would remain at the injection site—only to later discover it spreads throughout the body after targeting billions. The failure to rigorously test vaccine safety has led us to an "unhappy pass," he laments. It’s time to demand accountability and proper science. Listen to parents. Stop assuming. Start studying. The health of our children depends on it.

Camus

49,536 views • 1 year ago

Real Journalism. This was recorded in 2019 and is a must watch! For years, the government, medical establishment and vaccine industry have insisted that any science linking vaccines to autism is not to be believed. But what if the government's own pro-vaccine medical expert, who helped defend vaccines in federal vaccine court, privately told the government that vaccines can cause autism, after all? And what if the government not only covered that up but went on to misrepresent his opinion to debunk vaccine-autism lawsuits? Now—we have remarkable new information: a respected pro-vaccine medical expert used by the federal government to debunk the vaccine-autism link, says vaccines can cause autism after all. He claims he told that to government officials long ago, but they kept it secret.
10:28

Real Journalism. This was recorded in 2019 and is a must watch! For years, the government, medical establishment and vaccine industry have insisted that any science linking vaccines to autism is not to be believed. But what if the government's own pro-vaccine medical expert, who helped defend vaccines in federal vaccine court, privately told the government that vaccines can cause autism, after all? And what if the government not only covered that up but went on to misrepresent his opinion to debunk vaccine-autism lawsuits? Now—we have remarkable new information: a respected pro-vaccine medical expert used by the federal government to debunk the vaccine-autism link, says vaccines can cause autism after all. He claims he told that to government officials long ago, but they kept it secret.

Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

471,355 views • 2 years ago

Did you know that the death rate from measles declined by 98% BEFORE the measles vaccine was introduced? “This is all on the CDC website… That decline had nothing to do with vaccines.” So, if vaccines didn’t do it, what caused that decline from 1900 to 1963? The answer is better nutrition, better sanitation, clean water, etc., according to Attorney Aaron Siri. He explains, “That declining rate of mortality—it was a trajectory that was ongoing even when the measles vaccine was introduced in ’63. So those 400 [measles] deaths [per year], which have now gone down, how much of that is attributable to the measles vaccine? How much of it is to the continued efforts of public health agencies? “That could be debated forever. We don’t need to. But the important point is… when you listen to public health authorities today, they will say to you, ‘Measles is what caused the decline.’ ‘Measles vaccine is what caused the decline in mortality.’ They never talk about those other things that they did.”
2:40

Did you know that the death rate from measles declined by 98% BEFORE the measles vaccine was introduced? “This is all on the CDC website… That decline had nothing to do with vaccines.” So, if vaccines didn’t do it, what caused that decline from 1900 to 1963? The answer is better nutrition, better sanitation, clean water, etc., according to Attorney Aaron Siri. He explains, “That declining rate of mortality—it was a trajectory that was ongoing even when the measles vaccine was introduced in ’63. So those 400 [measles] deaths [per year], which have now gone down, how much of that is attributable to the measles vaccine? How much of it is to the continued efforts of public health agencies? “That could be debated forever. We don’t need to. But the important point is… when you listen to public health authorities today, they will say to you, ‘Measles is what caused the decline.’ ‘Measles vaccine is what caused the decline in mortality.’ They never talk about those other things that they did.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

627,782 views • 1 year ago