Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The humongous Trait difference between Virtuous #Meiteis and the wicked #Kuki #Meiteis have a mesmerizing relationship with nature since time immemorial #Meitei considers forest and trees as their deity . Unlike kuki who destroys forest and nature just for their evil benefits

33,932 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Oshin Nongmaithem
Oshin Nongmaithem2 лет назад

@ramindesai @BDUTT @IndiaToday @ndtv @republic @RahulGandhi @cnnbrk @AJEnglish @ReutersWorld @Indigenous559 I feel pity for the forest We the meiteis worshipped Umang Lai (sacred groves) and is preserve for the local forest dieties. And what kuki community did to the forest is horrifying. They are destroying the environment and the future. #Manipur #SaveMeiteiFromKuki

Фото профиля Dollar Yumnam
Dollar Yumnam2 лет назад

@ramindesai @BDUTT @IndiaToday @ndtv @republic @RahulGandhi @cnnbrk @AJEnglish @ReutersWorld @Indigenous559 Kukis are the conclusive proof that evolution can go in reverse.

Фото профиля Wahengbam Angouba
Wahengbam Angouba2 лет назад

@ramindesai @BDUTT @IndiaToday @ndtv @republic @RahulGandhi @cnnbrk @AJEnglish @ReutersWorld @Indigenous559 Kukis are the biggest environment threats

Фото профиля NH
NH2 лет назад

@ramindesai @BDUTT @IndiaToday @ndtv @republic @RahulGandhi @cnnbrk @AJEnglish @ReutersWorld @Indigenous559 #SaveMeiteiSaveManipur

Фото профиля ꯁꯤ.ꯀꯦ ꯈꯕꯥꯉꯟꯕ
ꯁꯤ.ꯀꯦ ꯈꯕꯥꯉꯟꯕ2 лет назад

@ramindesai @BDUTT @IndiaToday @ndtv @republic @RahulGandhi @cnnbrk @AJEnglish @ReutersWorld @Indigenous559 They didn't know that they destroyed our deities. #kukifake #kukiliesExposed #kukinarcoterrorists #illegalimmigrant #Manipur #SaveManipurSaveIndia

Фото профиля Muonkimgangte
Muonkimgangte2 лет назад

@ramindesai @BDUTT @IndiaToday @ndtv @republic @RahulGandhi @cnnbrk @AJEnglish @ReutersWorld @Indigenous559 You worshipped and give regards even to a dead tree and this is how you behave inside a church?,, #MeiteiAtrocities #murderer #inhumanity

Фото профиля salam Cashew
salam Cashew2 лет назад

@ramindesai @BDUTT @IndiaToday @ndtv @republic @RahulGandhi @cnnbrk @AJEnglish @ReutersWorld @Indigenous559 #SaveManipurSaveIndia #KukiNarcoTerrorists

Фото профиля Sona Ayekpam
Sona Ayekpam2 лет назад

@ramindesai @BDUTT @IndiaToday @ndtv @republic @RahulGandhi @cnnbrk @AJEnglish @ReutersWorld @Indigenous559 I feel pity 😔 of the forest...

Фото профиля Sarang_@
Sarang_@2 лет назад

@ramindesai @BDUTT @IndiaToday @ndtv @republic @RahulGandhi @cnnbrk @AJEnglish @ReutersWorld @Indigenous559 Cutting down trees and natural resources for obvious regions, yet they have the audacity to blame #Meitei for their shameless illegal unlawful acts.

Фото профиля KangleipakNaYaiphare
KangleipakNaYaiphare2 лет назад

@ramindesai @BDUTT @IndiaToday @ndtv @republic @RahulGandhi @cnnbrk @AJEnglish @ReutersWorld @Indigenous559 Heart breaks seeing what these savages have done to our land. Beautifully edited to see how the Meiteis RESPECT and WORSHIP the forest while they destroy it for personal gain. #SaveManipurSaveMeitei #KukiNarcoTerrorists

Похожие видео

The heart of the Kuki Radicalisation Programme The Kuki Worship Service Guwahati congregation sang a highly political, violence-inciting and radical Kuki patriotic song at church on May 3, 2026, during the observance of Kuki Separation Day. The video has since gone viral on social media. The song’s central theme focused on Kuki unification and revenge against those perceived as enemies of Kuki. One particular line states, “Do you not feel pained by other people killing us like wild animals,” a message intended to incite violence and emotionally mobilise so-called Kukis against perceived adversaries. Rather than conveying the gospel of Jesus or biblical teachings, the song was filled with emotionally charged slogans promoting violence, ethnic nationalism, militant radicalism, and revenge-driven sentiments. Clearly Kuki churches have for decades been the centre and heart of Kuki radicalisation backed by Kuki militant and civil groups. They openly promote radical Kuki nationalism and supremacist rhetoric, and actively campaign against other Christian communities. For many years, wholly-radicalised Kuki society have annually observed September 13 as “Kuki Black Day” across churches, villages, and various political, social, and religious platforms. Such observances have contributed to the radicalisation of young minds within the Kuki society, drawing successive generations into violent ethnic and political movements directed against other communities. Just like the global jihadist movement, the Kuki radical movement has increasingly assumed an extremist character that justifies, promotes, and glorifies violence in pursuit of ethnic supremacy over other communities, particularly indigenous groups such as the Aimol, Kom, Thadou, Hmar, Mizo, Meitei, and tribes grouped and identified under the Zomi and Naga nomenclatures. Just as the annual observance of Kuki Black Day has sustained Kuki radicalisation since the 1990s through religious, church-based, and socio-political platforms, the annual observance of May 3 as “Kuki Separation Day” is sure to further entrench and advance Kuki extremist violent agendas in the years ahead. This is designed and bound to contribute to future large-scale ethnic violence involving Kuki and intensify recurring conflicts in Manipur and neighbouring regions in advancement of Kuki supremacy. Kuki radicalisation has expanded its influence into the state administration through political patronage and support networks involving politicians and government officials at various levels. Examples include former chief minister O. Ibobi, current chief minister Khemchand, a Meitei politician strongly aligned with Kuki political interests, and Alfred Arthur, a Tangkhul Naga leader who serves as a Kuki-backed Member of Parliament from Manipur. The truth about the impact of Kuki appeasement politics has to be told. Kuki influence has long been underestimated because many people accepted narratives portraying Kuki primarily as victims, despite open organised political and militant activity. This influence has been sustained with the support of certain Indian government agencies, sections of the military, influential political actors, and activist media groups for nefarious motives. Kuki has is now is an existential threat to the people of Manipur and India and the society. Kuki is not an ethnic group but a radical, violent movement, and it should be referred to exactly as it is, not otherwise. The evidence is ample. Lasting peace in Manipur will not be possible so long Kuki exists, and until and unless all forms of Kuki militancy, extremism, and Kuki radicalisation are addressed and ended collectively and impartially. The people of Manipur and India must unite against Kuki terrorism, militancy and extremism, and make the Government of India to stop Kuki appeassement and end state sponsorship and support for armed proxy groups, the Kuki militant groups, and instead uphold democracy, justice, and peace.

Michael Lamjathang Thadou

10,325 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

A press conference was held with the Meitei Supporters of Lucknow at Uttar Pradesh Press Club, Lucknow. Davnesh Dixit also took part in the press conference and spoke in support of the Meiteis. I exposed the truth regarding the current crisis in Manipur and showed the photos and videos of the current crisis. I also showed the video of how two Meiteis were brutally killed by the Kukis. When meiteis protested, it is truly a peace protest and we never include any weapon in our protest. But when Kukis protests or organise a rally or make any video, they always show lots of sophisticated weapon. The literal meaning can be that, they want to show that they have many weapons and they don’t care neither the State Government nor the Indian Government. Meiteis are a peace loving community and have been living with other communities under a Meitei King. But after merger with Bharat in 1949 and after the arrival of Indian Constitution in 1951, the Meiteis were not listed in Schedule Tribe list though we are Forest Hindu Tribe. In census of 1891, A general report, page 194, Manipuris were recorded as forest tribes. Census of 1901, Volume 1, page 121 documents Manipuri under the Province of Assam as the main tribe of Manipur. Census of 1931 volume 1, page 430, para 181 clarifies Manipuris as wholly as Hindu Tribe but retaining their distinctive language and culture. Imperial Gazatter of India Provincial Series-Eastern Bengal and Assam and Gazatter of Bengal and North East India 1909, records Manipuri(Meitei) as one of the Principal Tribe of North East India. In 1950 the Schedule Tribe list was prepared and the Meiteis was excluded from the list which came out in 1951 census. Furthermore, in 1960 with the coming of the MLR Act, the meiteis was allowed to live in just 8 percent of the total land of Manipur. It is indeed violation of the Right to Equality and Right to Live in our own state, which is our Fundamental Rights given by the Indian Constitution. The current Kukis’ act is not just against to the Meiteis or against Manipur Government but it is also against Indian Government. So, Chin Kuki Narco Terrorists and illegal immigrats should be removed from all over India.

Maheshwar Thounaojam

33,766 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Many of my fellow Indians struggle to grasp what happened in Manipur. To put it into perspective, imagine if illegal Bangladeshi immigrants, backed by unscrupulous politicians, laid claim to the sacred Ayodhya or Tirumala hills. How would the public, especially the devotees of Lord Rama and Lord Venkateswara, react? That is precisely what has transpired in Manipur. Koubru and Thangjing are sacred mountains for the Indigenous people of Manipur, particularly the Meiteis. They are revered as Lord Koubru and Lord Thangjing, with Koubru later becoming associated with Lord Shiva after the advent of Hinduism. For centuries, devotees have undertaken pilgrimages to these mountains, which hold deep religious and historical significance. Meiteis believe that human settlement in Manipur originated from Koubru Peak, gradually expanding to the foothills, valleys, and surrounding hill regions. Similarly, Thangjing is sacred to the people of Southern Manipur, cutting across community lines. Despite their importance, successive governments have failed to protect and develop these sites. In 2020, the government under N. Biren Singh took steps to safeguard these historic locations under the Manipur Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act of 1976. A notification issued on November 26, 2020, by the Commissioner of Arts and Culture proposed declaring 2 hectares atop Koubru and 4 hectares atop Thangjing as protected sites. These areas fall under the Kanglatongbi-Koubru Reserve Forest and the Churachandpur-Khoupum Protected Forest, making them government land. However, certain Kuki organizations and militants began claiming Koubru as their ancestral land, while villagers around Thangjing opposed the traditional pilgrimage. This has deeply hurt the sentiments of devotees, particularly the Meiteis. Many Kuki settlements in the Koubru range are of recent origin, and an inquiry by the Forest Department found that several villages around Thangjing Hill were illegally established through fraudulent manipulation of Forest Act and procedures. This aggression by Kuki groups has been ongoing for years, as seen in the 2015 attack on peaceful protestors advocating for the implementation of the Inner Line Permit (ILP) in Manipur at Moreh. The situation escalated dramatically on May 3, 2023, when Kuki militants and their supporters set fire to Meitei homes and properties in Churachandpur, Moreh, and other Kuki-dominated areas. The violence began with the burning of Meitei homes in Torbung, on the border between Churachandpur and Bishnupur districts. Shri Alfred Arthur, MP, is well aware of these facts but still chose to distort them in Parliament by blaming N. Biren Singh. While the Manipur government bears responsibility, particularly as the then-DGP (a Kuki officer) failed to contain the initial violence in Torbung area despite orders from the Chief Minister, the Government of India is also culpable. The Assam Rifles failed to prevent the burning of Meitei homes in Churachandpur, Moreh, and other Kuki-dominated areas, despite clear orders from Union Home Minister Amit Shah. This raises a crucial question: Why did the Manipur DGP ignore the Chief Minister’s orders while the Assam Rifles DG disregarded the Union Home Minister’s directive to protect civilians? This strongly suggests a long-planned and orchestrated attack. Shri Alfred may have his own agenda in advocating for separate budget allocations for the hills and valleys in Parliament. However, he should acknowledge that under N. Biren Singh’s leadership, infrastructure development in Manipur’s hill regions has been unparalleled in the state’s history.

Jagat Thoudam

12,282 просмотров • 1 год назад