Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

The ICT Exposed: When a Trial Becomes a Political Script What unfolded in the name of the International Crimes Tribunal was not justice—it was a political drama dressed as due process. From the moment this tribunal was announced, critics warned that the outcome felt pre-written. A process that should... have upheld the highest standards of law instead raised serious questions: restricted defence rights, questionable procedural decisions, selective prosecution, and a media narrative that seemed decided long before any verdict. The courtroom looked less like a place for evidence—and more like a stage where the conclusion had been rehearsed. Meanwhile, political actors with their own histories of violence faced no such scrutiny. All energy, it seemed, was directed at one target: Sheikh Hasina. This wasn’t just a trial. It was a message. A system calibrated for a single result. A verdict many say was built not on law, but on politics. Justice denied. Politics delivered. #Bangladesh #ICTBD #BangladeshCrisis #SheikhHasinashow more

Bangladesh Awami League

655,530 subscribers

15,646 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Bangladesh‘s former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s “genocide trial” in Bangladesh looks more like revenge than justice. A tribunal made for 1971 war crimes now fast‑tracking her death sentence under a redesigned law. Even the judges changed overnight, justice or political theatre? Is this trial delivering justice, or is it just a political drama playing out on the world stage? Let’s dive in through my #vlog :-

Bangladesh‘s former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s “genocide trial” in Bangladesh looks more like revenge than justice. A tribunal made for 1971 war crimes now fast‑tracking her death sentence under a redesigned law. Even the judges changed overnight, justice or political theatre? Is this trial delivering justice, or is it just a political drama playing out on the world stage? Let’s dive in through my #vlog :-

Ravinder Singh Robin ਰਵਿੰਦਰ ਸਿੰਘ ਰੌਬਿਨ

34,449 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

India was never a friend of Bangladesh as a nation, it was a friend of one individual, Sheikh Hasina. When relations with a stronger neighboring country depend not on the people but on a single leader who is also the prime minister, what should that be called if not slavery?

India was never a friend of Bangladesh as a nation, it was a friend of one individual, Sheikh Hasina. When relations with a stronger neighboring country depend not on the people but on a single leader who is also the prime minister, what should that be called if not slavery?

Defence research forum DRF

12,225 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Damiano Damiani's "A Bullet for the General" (1966) was the first Italian western to deal seriously with the Mexican revolution. It was very successful when it was released in Italy in December 1966 a week before "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly" (1966). In the USA it was distributed by Joseph E. Levine’s Avco Embassy and had an effective poster campaign: ‘Like the Bandit. . .Like the Gringo.. A bullet doesn’t care who it ki||s’ and ‘Nothing can stop the Bandit except the Gringo... Nothing can stop the Gringo except the General...Nothing can stop the General except a bullet!’ American critics noted that Damiani had made a rarity- a commercial art film- but opinion was divided; some claimed the film wasn’t incisive enough for a political film, nor exciting enough for a western. Damiani was indignant that just because Bullet looked like a western, many critics classed it as one. He claimed it was a political film about the Mexican revolution- just as "The Battle of Algiers" (1966) was not a war film, but a political film about the Algerian revolution. ("Once Upon a Time in the Italian West", Howard Hughes, 2004)

Damiano Damiani's "A Bullet for the General" (1966) was the first Italian western to deal seriously with the Mexican revolution. It was very successful when it was released in Italy in December 1966 a week before "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly" (1966). In the USA it was distributed by Joseph E. Levine’s Avco Embassy and had an effective poster campaign: ‘Like the Bandit. . .Like the Gringo.. A bullet doesn’t care who it ki||s’ and ‘Nothing can stop the Bandit except the Gringo... Nothing can stop the Gringo except the General...Nothing can stop the General except a bullet!’ American critics noted that Damiani had made a rarity- a commercial art film- but opinion was divided; some claimed the film wasn’t incisive enough for a political film, nor exciting enough for a western. Damiani was indignant that just because Bullet looked like a western, many critics classed it as one. He claimed it was a political film about the Mexican revolution- just as "The Battle of Algiers" (1966) was not a war film, but a political film about the Algerian revolution. ("Once Upon a Time in the Italian West", Howard Hughes, 2004)

DepressedBergman

23,422 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Justice Tariq Mahmood Jahangiri was removed not through accountability, but through manipulation. The Constitution of Pakistan is clear. Allegations against a sitting judge must be examined by the Supreme Judicial Council. That process exists to protect judicial independence, ensure due process, and prevent political interference. In this case, it was deliberately bypassed. Justice Jahangiri was denied a proper forum, the right to be heard, and a fair constitutional process. His removal was engineered through administrative pressure and procedural shortcuts, not through law. This was not oversight. It was an unlawful purge. To make this outcome possible, dissenting voices were silenced. On the day a key institutional review was scheduled, Dr. Riaz Ahmed was abducted to ensure he could not participate. His detention was not incidental. It was part of the same effort to control the process and force a predetermined result. He has since spoken publicly about his ordeal. The message is unmistakable. Judges who refuse to comply can be removed without the Supreme Judicial Council. Due process can be discarded. The Constitution can be treated as optional. This is not about one judge. This is about turning the judiciary into a controlled institution through fear and coercion. When judges are removed by unfair means, justice itself is on trial. This is undeclared martial law. #FascismUnderAsimLaw #FreeImranKhan

Justice Tariq Mahmood Jahangiri was removed not through accountability, but through manipulation. The Constitution of Pakistan is clear. Allegations against a sitting judge must be examined by the Supreme Judicial Council. That process exists to protect judicial independence, ensure due process, and prevent political interference. In this case, it was deliberately bypassed. Justice Jahangiri was denied a proper forum, the right to be heard, and a fair constitutional process. His removal was engineered through administrative pressure and procedural shortcuts, not through law. This was not oversight. It was an unlawful purge. To make this outcome possible, dissenting voices were silenced. On the day a key institutional review was scheduled, Dr. Riaz Ahmed was abducted to ensure he could not participate. His detention was not incidental. It was part of the same effort to control the process and force a predetermined result. He has since spoken publicly about his ordeal. The message is unmistakable. Judges who refuse to comply can be removed without the Supreme Judicial Council. Due process can be discarded. The Constitution can be treated as optional. This is not about one judge. This is about turning the judiciary into a controlled institution through fear and coercion. When judges are removed by unfair means, justice itself is on trial. This is undeclared martial law. #FascismUnderAsimLaw #FreeImranKhan

PTI

25,098 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Far too many people on “both sides” completely lost the plot when it came to this story. They didn’t want justice for Austin, they didn’t want compassion for Karmelo, they just wanted to use this story to attack their political opponents. This was a tragedy that ruined two young mens lives, and the vast majority of those who covered it didn’t care about either of them. This was just another political football to keep the race war alive and create more situations like this in the future. Yes, justice was served in a court of law, and the verdict was appropriate, but the court of public opinion failed miserably here, and that’s what you should take away from this.

Far too many people on “both sides” completely lost the plot when it came to this story. They didn’t want justice for Austin, they didn’t want compassion for Karmelo, they just wanted to use this story to attack their political opponents. This was a tragedy that ruined two young mens lives, and the vast majority of those who covered it didn’t care about either of them. This was just another political football to keep the race war alive and create more situations like this in the future. Yes, justice was served in a court of law, and the verdict was appropriate, but the court of public opinion failed miserably here, and that’s what you should take away from this.

The Misfit Patriot

20,437 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

It was at this moment that Egg realised he was the brains of this operation. Many people sleep on A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms. It may not have as much drama or politics as GOT or HOTD, but it's really a fine series

It was at this moment that Egg realised he was the brains of this operation. Many people sleep on A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms. It may not have as much drama or politics as GOT or HOTD, but it's really a fine series

Unique Movie Moments 🐬

99,534 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

President Biden: The American principle that no one is above the law was reaffirmed. Donald Trump was given every opportunity to defend himself. It was a state case, not a federal case. And it was heard by a jury of 12 citizens. 12 Americans, 12 people like you. Like millions of Americans who served on juries, this jury is chosen the same way every jury in America is chosen. It was a process that Donald Trump's attorney was part of. The jury heard five weeks of evidence. After careful deliberation, the jury reached a unanimous verdict. They found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts. Now he’ll be given the opportunity as he should to appeal that decision just like everyone else has that opportunity. That's how the American system of justice works. And it's reckless, it's dangerous, and it's irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict. Our justice system has endured for nearly 250 years and it literally is the cornerstone of America. The justice system should be respected, and we should never allow anyone to tear it down. That's America. That's who we are. And that's who we will always be, God willing

President Biden: The American principle that no one is above the law was reaffirmed. Donald Trump was given every opportunity to defend himself. It was a state case, not a federal case. And it was heard by a jury of 12 citizens. 12 Americans, 12 people like you. Like millions of Americans who served on juries, this jury is chosen the same way every jury in America is chosen. It was a process that Donald Trump's attorney was part of. The jury heard five weeks of evidence. After careful deliberation, the jury reached a unanimous verdict. They found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts. Now he’ll be given the opportunity as he should to appeal that decision just like everyone else has that opportunity. That's how the American system of justice works. And it's reckless, it's dangerous, and it's irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict. Our justice system has endured for nearly 250 years and it literally is the cornerstone of America. The justice system should be respected, and we should never allow anyone to tear it down. That's America. That's who we are. And that's who we will always be, God willing

Headquarters

1,286,979 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

#WATCH | Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh): On Ram Mandir, West Bengal Minister Siddiqullah Choudhury says, "... The mosque was forcibly demolished, and a temple was built. We do not agree with that. We lost the matter of the Babri Masjid 23 years ago, and a temple was built there. This is a political issue, not a religious one... We heard a controversial statement by BJP members saying, whoever builds a mosque will have a reward of 1 crore. BJP’s thinking, not the thinking of the nation. For 450 years, there was a mosque, and from there a temple was built. We say justice was not done. The court did not deliver justice..."

#WATCH | Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh): On Ram Mandir, West Bengal Minister Siddiqullah Choudhury says, "... The mosque was forcibly demolished, and a temple was built. We do not agree with that. We lost the matter of the Babri Masjid 23 years ago, and a temple was built there. This is a political issue, not a religious one... We heard a controversial statement by BJP members saying, whoever builds a mosque will have a reward of 1 crore. BJP’s thinking, not the thinking of the nation. For 450 years, there was a mosque, and from there a temple was built. We say justice was not done. The court did not deliver justice..."

ANI

86,020 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

BREAKING: Outraged Biden blasts Trump after jury finds him guilty in liberal New York, says, "It's reckless, dangerous, and irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict." WATCH He says, "Before I begin my remarks, I just want to say a few words about what happened yesterday in New York City. The American principle that no one is above the law was reaffirmed. Donald Trump was given every opportunity to defend himself. It was a state case, not a federal case, and it was heard by a jury of twelve citizens. Twelve Americans. Twelve people like you, like millions of Americans who serve on juries. This jury was chosen the same way every jury in America is chosen. It was a process that Donald Trump's attorney was part of. "The jury heard five weeks of evidence. Five weeks. And after careful deliberation, the jury reached a unanimous verdict. They found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts. He will be given the opportunity, as he should, to appeal that decision, just like everyone else has that opportunity. That's how the American system of justice works. "It's reckless, it's dangerous, and it's irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict. Our justice system has endured for nearly 250 years, and it is literally the cornerstone of America. Our justice system should be respected, and we should never allow anyone to tear it down. It's as simple as that."

BREAKING: Outraged Biden blasts Trump after jury finds him guilty in liberal New York, says, "It's reckless, dangerous, and irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict." WATCH He says, "Before I begin my remarks, I just want to say a few words about what happened yesterday in New York City. The American principle that no one is above the law was reaffirmed. Donald Trump was given every opportunity to defend himself. It was a state case, not a federal case, and it was heard by a jury of twelve citizens. Twelve Americans. Twelve people like you, like millions of Americans who serve on juries. This jury was chosen the same way every jury in America is chosen. It was a process that Donald Trump's attorney was part of. "The jury heard five weeks of evidence. Five weeks. And after careful deliberation, the jury reached a unanimous verdict. They found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts. He will be given the opportunity, as he should, to appeal that decision, just like everyone else has that opportunity. That's how the American system of justice works. "It's reckless, it's dangerous, and it's irresponsible for anyone to say this was rigged just because they don't like the verdict. Our justice system has endured for nearly 250 years, and it is literally the cornerstone of America. Our justice system should be respected, and we should never allow anyone to tear it down. It's as simple as that."

Simon Ateba

5,098,588 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨 TRUMP DECLARES WAR ON POLITICAL FRAUD President Trump just delivered one of the most explosive law-and-order speeches of his presidency. He vowed to pursue and imprison any politician or public official involved in fraud — calling out the corruption that has “looted and pillaged” America. And in a moment that stunned the room, he named Ilhan Omar directly, using her as a symbol of what he says is a broken and exploited system. This was not subtle. This was not diplomatic. It was a warning. Trump is signaling that: • public office will no longer be a shield • political status will not protect fraud • and the era of immunity is ending Whether you love him or hate him, the message was unmistakable: The gloves are off. Washington just felt a shockwave.

🚨 TRUMP DECLARES WAR ON POLITICAL FRAUD President Trump just delivered one of the most explosive law-and-order speeches of his presidency. He vowed to pursue and imprison any politician or public official involved in fraud — calling out the corruption that has “looted and pillaged” America. And in a moment that stunned the room, he named Ilhan Omar directly, using her as a symbol of what he says is a broken and exploited system. This was not subtle. This was not diplomatic. It was a warning. Trump is signaling that: • public office will no longer be a shield • political status will not protect fraud • and the era of immunity is ending Whether you love him or hate him, the message was unmistakable: The gloves are off. Washington just felt a shockwave.

Jim Ferguson

21,852 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

RFK Jr: “They recommended putting masks on babies.” “The CDC told us it was science-based.” “It wasn't, it was a political decision.” “They allowed all of our schools to be closed and that order was written by the teachers union and it hurt working people all across this country.” “They said it was science-based, but it was a political decision.” “We're getting the politics out of the CDC and returning it to a science-based agency.”

RFK Jr: “They recommended putting masks on babies.” “The CDC told us it was science-based.” “It wasn't, it was a political decision.” “They allowed all of our schools to be closed and that order was written by the teachers union and it hurt working people all across this country.” “They said it was science-based, but it was a political decision.” “We're getting the politics out of the CDC and returning it to a science-based agency.”

End Tribalism in Politics

360,978 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

No religious organisation, political party, or powerful institution—regardless of its influence or following— has the right to dictate how the Republic administers justice. The rule of law belongs to the Filipino people, not to any organisation that believes its political weight entitles it to special treatment. By publicly rallying behind Senator Rodante Marcoleta while the Ombudsman and the Department of Justice move towards filing plunder and indirect bribery charges, the Iglesia ni Cristo has chosen institutional loyalty over accountability. Instead of affirming that the law should take its course, it has created the unmistakable impression that one of its own should be shielded from the full force of the justice system. This is not an isolated matter. Senator Marcoleta has repeatedly attracted controversy—from his conduct during the Senate’s flood control inquiry, where he was accused of diverting scrutiny from key personalities and relying on discredited testimony, to serious questions surrounding undeclared campaign funds and other matters now under official investigation and an impending indictment for plunder and bribery. These allegations deserve to be tested in court, free from political or religious pressure. That is why the INC’s intervention is so troubling. A religious institution that deploys its influence to defend a politician facing grave criminal allegations, rather than insisting that justice be allowed to run its course, abandons the moral ground from which it claims to speak. It ceases to be merely a religious body and becomes a political actor seeking to influence the administration of justice. Where was this moral outrage when thousands of Filipinos died during the previous administration’s bloody drug war? Where was the INC when the Vice President was accused, replete with evidences, of corruption in office and threatened the life of a sitting President and his family? Where was this uncompromising defence of righteousness when corruption, abuse of power, and the erosion of democratic institutions demanded moral courage? Silence then, followed by political mobilisation now, is not righteousness. It is selective morality. If the INC truly believes in justice, it should welcome an independent investigation, not to resist it. Senator Marcoleta deserves due process—not immunity. He deserves a fair trial— not institutional protection. No one is above the law. Not a senator. Not a religious organisation. Not anyone who believes influence is a substitute for accountability. The rule of law must prevail over political pressure, religious influence, and institutional loyalty—every single time. Should the INC be allowed to dictate upon the government under threat of weaponising its people if their capricious objectives are not met? The INC was gifted with free expression and was put under no obligations to pay taxes for the exercise of its purpose. But the same INC is now threatening to rupture the nation into another decade of chaos and destruction. Let the INC and its leaders be warned— you have the right to choose what you want to do, but you have no right to choose the consequences of those actions.

No religious organisation, political party, or powerful institution—regardless of its influence or following— has the right to dictate how the Republic administers justice. The rule of law belongs to the Filipino people, not to any organisation that believes its political weight entitles it to special treatment. By publicly rallying behind Senator Rodante Marcoleta while the Ombudsman and the Department of Justice move towards filing plunder and indirect bribery charges, the Iglesia ni Cristo has chosen institutional loyalty over accountability. Instead of affirming that the law should take its course, it has created the unmistakable impression that one of its own should be shielded from the full force of the justice system. This is not an isolated matter. Senator Marcoleta has repeatedly attracted controversy—from his conduct during the Senate’s flood control inquiry, where he was accused of diverting scrutiny from key personalities and relying on discredited testimony, to serious questions surrounding undeclared campaign funds and other matters now under official investigation and an impending indictment for plunder and bribery. These allegations deserve to be tested in court, free from political or religious pressure. That is why the INC’s intervention is so troubling. A religious institution that deploys its influence to defend a politician facing grave criminal allegations, rather than insisting that justice be allowed to run its course, abandons the moral ground from which it claims to speak. It ceases to be merely a religious body and becomes a political actor seeking to influence the administration of justice. Where was this moral outrage when thousands of Filipinos died during the previous administration’s bloody drug war? Where was the INC when the Vice President was accused, replete with evidences, of corruption in office and threatened the life of a sitting President and his family? Where was this uncompromising defence of righteousness when corruption, abuse of power, and the erosion of democratic institutions demanded moral courage? Silence then, followed by political mobilisation now, is not righteousness. It is selective morality. If the INC truly believes in justice, it should welcome an independent investigation, not to resist it. Senator Marcoleta deserves due process—not immunity. He deserves a fair trial— not institutional protection. No one is above the law. Not a senator. Not a religious organisation. Not anyone who believes influence is a substitute for accountability. The rule of law must prevail over political pressure, religious influence, and institutional loyalty—every single time. Should the INC be allowed to dictate upon the government under threat of weaponising its people if their capricious objectives are not met? The INC was gifted with free expression and was put under no obligations to pay taxes for the exercise of its purpose. But the same INC is now threatening to rupture the nation into another decade of chaos and destruction. Let the INC and its leaders be warned— you have the right to choose what you want to do, but you have no right to choose the consequences of those actions.

The King

10,699 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

“That ANC - African National Congress Democratic Alliance and VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS GNU in South Africa was a pure political choice - a capitalist political choice it was also a class choice, it was not on the basis of no alternative, I was in the inner debate of this question, I participated for instance with Julius Sello Malema we were trying to not get the ANC to be in bed with the right wing forces” SACP GS Solly Mapaila “But the decision was already taken before the outcome of the elections, that was the problem, so the negotiations that we entered into, there was already a discussion and a finished memorandum together with the Da. So what was the negotiations about” SACP GS Solly Mapaila

“That ANC - African National Congress Democratic Alliance and VRYHEIDSFRONT PLUS GNU in South Africa was a pure political choice - a capitalist political choice it was also a class choice, it was not on the basis of no alternative, I was in the inner debate of this question, I participated for instance with Julius Sello Malema we were trying to not get the ANC to be in bed with the right wing forces” SACP GS Solly Mapaila “But the decision was already taken before the outcome of the elections, that was the problem, so the negotiations that we entered into, there was already a discussion and a finished memorandum together with the Da. So what was the negotiations about” SACP GS Solly Mapaila

News Live SA

39,026 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

After defendant puts on a show with his comments, the judge lays down the hammer giving the sentence deserved. After two decades of legal maneuvering, the families of Jason Galehouse and Michael Wachholtz finally saw the face of evil receive its final judgment. Steven Lorenzo and an accomplice carried out some of the most "heinous, atrocious, and cruel" crimes in Tampa's history—drugged, kidnapped, and tortured their victims before disposing of their bodies. The trial took a bizarre turn when Lorenzo, representing himself, waived his right to a jury and practically begged for the death penalty. His reasoning? He claimed death row was more "comfortable" than federal prison and spoke of "fetching a new body" through reincarnation. When it came time for the sentencing, Judge Christopher Sabella delivered a masterclass in judicial power. He didn't just read a verdict; he dismantled Lorenzo’s attempts to treat the courtroom like a stage. The judge looked him in the eye and made it clear that while Lorenzo requested death, the court was granting it strictly because his actions demanded it. Sabella’s words were a heavy, unrelenting hammer—a powerful reminder that the legal system can still meet depravity with absolute, unwavering justice. "The evidence is overwhelming," the judge stated, ensuring that Lorenzo’s "request" was irrelevant to the fact that he simply deserved the ultimate price. Justice was delayed, but it was not denied.

After defendant puts on a show with his comments, the judge lays down the hammer giving the sentence deserved. After two decades of legal maneuvering, the families of Jason Galehouse and Michael Wachholtz finally saw the face of evil receive its final judgment. Steven Lorenzo and an accomplice carried out some of the most "heinous, atrocious, and cruel" crimes in Tampa's history—drugged, kidnapped, and tortured their victims before disposing of their bodies. The trial took a bizarre turn when Lorenzo, representing himself, waived his right to a jury and practically begged for the death penalty. His reasoning? He claimed death row was more "comfortable" than federal prison and spoke of "fetching a new body" through reincarnation. When it came time for the sentencing, Judge Christopher Sabella delivered a masterclass in judicial power. He didn't just read a verdict; he dismantled Lorenzo’s attempts to treat the courtroom like a stage. The judge looked him in the eye and made it clear that while Lorenzo requested death, the court was granting it strictly because his actions demanded it. Sabella’s words were a heavy, unrelenting hammer—a powerful reminder that the legal system can still meet depravity with absolute, unwavering justice. "The evidence is overwhelming," the judge stated, ensuring that Lorenzo’s "request" was irrelevant to the fact that he simply deserved the ultimate price. Justice was delayed, but it was not denied.

Giggling Ganon

65,338 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Joe Rogan: "The division when I was a kid, like the Reagan days, there was a lot of people that didn’t like Reagan, but it was never evil. It was never like this vile hatred of someone that you see today for different political parties and politicians."

Joe Rogan: "The division when I was a kid, like the Reagan days, there was a lot of people that didn’t like Reagan, but it was never evil. It was never like this vile hatred of someone that you see today for different political parties and politicians."

Joe Rogan Podcast News

33,891 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

I was GLUED to the O. J. Simpson murder trial like the whole country wasn’t breathing. Then the verdict dropped… NOT. GUILTY. 😳 And I remember thinking—there is NO way we all just watched the same trial. O. J. Simpson walked free while the evidence, the arguments, and the tension told a completely different story depending on who you asked. That wasn’t just a courtroom decision… That was a cultural earthquake. Some saw justice. Some saw failure. Everyone saw division. And decades later? People are STILL split right down the middle. That case didn’t just test the system… It exposed it. 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

I was GLUED to the O. J. Simpson murder trial like the whole country wasn’t breathing. Then the verdict dropped… NOT. GUILTY. 😳 And I remember thinking—there is NO way we all just watched the same trial. O. J. Simpson walked free while the evidence, the arguments, and the tension told a completely different story depending on who you asked. That wasn’t just a courtroom decision… That was a cultural earthquake. Some saw justice. Some saw failure. Everyone saw division. And decades later? People are STILL split right down the middle. That case didn’t just test the system… It exposed it. 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

🌺🌸🇺🇸✝️MAR✝️🇺🇸🌸🌺

25,558 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

I’m going to spend the rest of my life processing yesterday. The energy in that arena was true spiritual and revival energy. I've never seen anything like it. Charlie Kirk pulled off the impossible: a 100,000-person memorial in just 10 days. No nation on earth could have done this. Rafters, floors, overflow rooms, and even a neighboring arena filled to capacity. And yet it was completely peaceful. No violence, no chaos, just prayer, forgiveness, and a call for righteous justice. This wasn’t a sporting event or politics. It was spiritual, a living testament to Charlie’s vision and the movement he built.

I’m going to spend the rest of my life processing yesterday. The energy in that arena was true spiritual and revival energy. I've never seen anything like it. Charlie Kirk pulled off the impossible: a 100,000-person memorial in just 10 days. No nation on earth could have done this. Rafters, floors, overflow rooms, and even a neighboring arena filled to capacity. And yet it was completely peaceful. No violence, no chaos, just prayer, forgiveness, and a call for righteous justice. This wasn’t a sporting event or politics. It was spiritual, a living testament to Charlie’s vision and the movement he built.

Benny Johnson

263,559 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten