Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

"the Irish only beat the Panthers by 22" Pitt called a timeout with 5 seconds left to score this meaningless touchdown vs. ND backups. Pitt's other TD was a pick six. Notre Dame's defense didn't give up a score that mattered. So, yeah. Be careful how you interpret box scores.

Tyler Horka

29,917 subscribers

668,843 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Sports

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Wildest game of the NCHSAA regionals so far (and maybe the NCHSAA season)? So Salisbury beat Central Davidson to go the state finals for the first time in 39 years. This is how it happened: Central’s Eli Staten hit a 3 with 2.8 seconds left to put his team up 46-44. But after a timeout, freshman Royce Perkins hit a halfcourt bank shot to top it. WATCH:

Wildest game of the NCHSAA regionals so far (and maybe the NCHSAA season)? So Salisbury beat Central Davidson to go the state finals for the first time in 39 years. This is how it happened: Central’s Eli Staten hit a 3 with 2.8 seconds left to put his team up 46-44. But after a timeout, freshman Royce Perkins hit a halfcourt bank shot to top it. WATCH:

Langston Wertz Jr.

41,342 views • 6 months ago

🚨 TROPHY TITAN WINNERS CIRCLE 🚨 How to do it efficiently: Total Games: 20 GAMES 1-19 SQUAD: ▪️ 1 Trophy Titan Item ▪️ 1 Spanish, 1 German, 1 French Player ▪️ 5 Italian Players THE TASKS: ⚽️ Score in 15 separate matches with a German 🎯 Assist 10 with a Spanish & French player 🛡️ Concede 2 goals or less in your wins GAME 20 FINALE: 🇧🇷 Swap to 5 Brazilians in your XI ⚽️ Score 5 goals in the final match (this gives you a 1 of 2 Trophy Titan pick and then next week will give you a 90+ Trophy Titan Pick)

🚨 TROPHY TITAN WINNERS CIRCLE 🚨 How to do it efficiently: Total Games: 20 GAMES 1-19 SQUAD: ▪️ 1 Trophy Titan Item ▪️ 1 Spanish, 1 German, 1 French Player ▪️ 5 Italian Players THE TASKS: ⚽️ Score in 15 separate matches with a German 🎯 Assist 10 with a Spanish & French player 🛡️ Concede 2 goals or less in your wins GAME 20 FINALE: 🇧🇷 Swap to 5 Brazilians in your XI ⚽️ Score 5 goals in the final match (this gives you a 1 of 2 Trophy Titan pick and then next week will give you a 90+ Trophy Titan Pick)

𝙁𝙐𝙏𝙒𝙄𝙕

142,634 views • 5 months ago

I got inspired by Supreme Drops's Customizable Box Logo April Fools prank and thought it'd be cool to see how this would work on the actual Supreme site. Give it a try at Reply with what you come up with, would love to see how creative y'all get.

Mohak

123,381 views • 3 years ago

$Softmax vs Sigmoid ✍️ Interact 👉 = Softmax = Softmax is how deep networks turn raw scores into a probability distribution — the final layer of every classifier, and the core of every attention head in a transformer. To see what it does, picture five boba tea shops on the same block, all competing for your dollar. Five candidates: a, b, c, d, e — different chains, different brewing styles, different pearls. A boba reviewer hands you a 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘦 for each — higher means perfectly chewy "QQ" pearls with the right bite (ask a Taiwanese friend to find out what QQ means). Negative scores are real: mushy bobas, overcooked pearls, a batch left sitting too long. How do you turn five chewiness scores into an allocation that adds to a whole dollar? You could spend everything at the chewiest shop, but that ignores how good the runners-up are. Softmax is the smooth alternative. Read the diagram left to right. First, raise each score to e^{x} — this does two things: it turns negative chewiness into small positives, and it stretches the gaps between scores exponentially. Then sum all five into a single total Z. Finally, divide each e^{x} by Z to get a probability. The five probabilities add up to one, so you can read them as percentages of your dollar. The chewiest shop gets the biggest slice — but never the whole dollar. That's the point of softmax: it ranks confidently while still leaving room for the others. = Sigmoid = Sigmoid squashes any real number into a probability between 0 and 1 — the classic activation for binary classification, and still the gating function inside LSTMs and GRUs. Same boba block as the previous Softmax example, narrowed to just two contenders — a hot new shop `a` with chewiness score x, and your usual go-to `b` whose score is pinned at zero (the neutral baseline you've come to expect). Sigmoid is just softmax with two players, one of them pinned to zero. Read the diagram left to right. First, raise each score to e^{x} — for the usual shop `b` whose score is zero, this is just e^0 = 1 (the constant baseline). Then sum the two into a total Z. Finally, divide each e^{x} by Z to get a probability. The two probabilities add up to one — the new shop wins more of your dollar when its pearls get chewier, and your usual keeps the rest. That's the point of sigmoid: it turns a single chewiness score into a clean 0-to-1 chance you'll try the new place over your usual. --- AI Math, Algorithms, Architectures by hand ✍️ Subscribe to my 60K+ reader newsletter 👉$

Softmax vs Sigmoid ✍️ Interact 👉 = Softmax = Softmax is how deep networks turn raw scores into a probability distribution — the final layer of every classifier, and the core of every attention head in a transformer. To see what it does, picture five boba tea shops on the same block, all competing for your dollar. Five candidates: a, b, c, d, e — different chains, different brewing styles, different pearls. A boba reviewer hands you a 𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘸𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘴𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘦 for each — higher means perfectly chewy "QQ" pearls with the right bite (ask a Taiwanese friend to find out what QQ means). Negative scores are real: mushy bobas, overcooked pearls, a batch left sitting too long. How do you turn five chewiness scores into an allocation that adds to a whole dollar? You could spend everything at the chewiest shop, but that ignores how good the runners-up are. Softmax is the smooth alternative. Read the diagram left to right. First, raise each score to e^{x} — this does two things: it turns negative chewiness into small positives, and it stretches the gaps between scores exponentially. Then sum all five into a single total Z. Finally, divide each e^{x} by Z to get a probability. The five probabilities add up to one, so you can read them as percentages of your dollar. The chewiest shop gets the biggest slice — but never the whole dollar. That's the point of softmax: it ranks confidently while still leaving room for the others. = Sigmoid = Sigmoid squashes any real number into a probability between 0 and 1 — the classic activation for binary classification, and still the gating function inside LSTMs and GRUs. Same boba block as the previous Softmax example, narrowed to just two contenders — a hot new shop `a` with chewiness score x, and your usual go-to `b` whose score is pinned at zero (the neutral baseline you've come to expect). Sigmoid is just softmax with two players, one of them pinned to zero. Read the diagram left to right. First, raise each score to e^{x} — for the usual shop `b` whose score is zero, this is just e^0 = 1 (the constant baseline). Then sum the two into a total Z. Finally, divide each e^{x} by Z to get a probability. The two probabilities add up to one — the new shop wins more of your dollar when its pearls get chewier, and your usual keeps the rest. That's the point of sigmoid: it turns a single chewiness score into a clean 0-to-1 chance you'll try the new place over your usual. --- AI Math, Algorithms, Architectures by hand ✍️ Subscribe to my 60K+ reader newsletter 👉

Tom Yeh

74,503 views • 4 months ago

🚨GROUND RULE SINGLE ALERT🚨 We had another walk-off ground rule single to give the Detroit Tigers a 2-1 win over the Los Angeles Dodgers today. The bases were loaded when Kevin McGonigle hit a ball that bounced over the wall for what is normally a ground rule, or automatic, double. But, since the winning run was on third, the batter can only be credited with the number of bases it takes to score the winning run, so in this case a single. The exception to this is an on out of park run, everyone is entitled to score (meaning all must touch all the bases to count). #Dodgers #RepDetroit

🚨GROUND RULE SINGLE ALERT🚨 We had another walk-off ground rule single to give the Detroit Tigers a 2-1 win over the Los Angeles Dodgers today. The bases were loaded when Kevin McGonigle hit a ball that bounced over the wall for what is normally a ground rule, or automatic, double. But, since the winning run was on third, the batter can only be credited with the number of bases it takes to score the winning run, so in this case a single. The exception to this is an on out of park run, everyone is entitled to score (meaning all must touch all the bases to count). #Dodgers #RepDetroit

MLB Scoring Changes

88,270 views • 28 days ago

Dustin Johnson opened LIV Golf Andalucia with a 5 over par 76. Since then he’s shot rounds of 3 under par 68, and a sensational 7 under par 64 today, with the most nonchalant ace ever, to climb into the top 5 at Valderrama. He spoke about the bounce back after the round: “Yeah, I know it's weird, but I didn't play bad the first day. It was like everything that could -- missed quite a few putts and hit a lot of good shots and ended up in bad spots. Yeah, I didn't feel like -- it was a really easy 5-over. Then obviously came back and played really nicely the last two days. Even today, I know I shot 7-under which is a really good score, but I played the par-5s even. “Yeah, I'm happy, obviously very happy with the score and very pleased with how I'm swinging the golf club.” DJ hasn’t won anywhere in the world for more than 2 years. He’ll start tomorrow 5 shots off the lead of Tyrrell Hatton. Dustin Johnson 4Aces GC LIV Golf

Dustin Johnson opened LIV Golf Andalucia with a 5 over par 76. Since then he’s shot rounds of 3 under par 68, and a sensational 7 under par 64 today, with the most nonchalant ace ever, to climb into the top 5 at Valderrama. He spoke about the bounce back after the round: “Yeah, I know it's weird, but I didn't play bad the first day. It was like everything that could -- missed quite a few putts and hit a lot of good shots and ended up in bad spots. Yeah, I didn't feel like -- it was a really easy 5-over. Then obviously came back and played really nicely the last two days. Even today, I know I shot 7-under which is a really good score, but I played the par-5s even. “Yeah, I'm happy, obviously very happy with the score and very pleased with how I'm swinging the golf club.” DJ hasn’t won anywhere in the world for more than 2 years. He’ll start tomorrow 5 shots off the lead of Tyrrell Hatton. Dustin Johnson 4Aces GC LIV Golf

Flushing It

85,120 views • 3 months ago

Pete Alonso was sitting at his locker in the Orioles' clubhouse during media availability postgame, ready to address getting picked off to end the 8th inning and noting that he felt "awful." "I over-anticipated contact in the zone. For me, I kind of had a pretty big primary lead with 2 outs. There's multiple things I wanted to do. "I wanted to be able to get to 2nd if there was a ball hit to the infield, beat the throw, and then also, too, if there's a ball hit in the outfield -- either in the gap or down the line -- I would give myself the best chance to score. "So it was kind of my momentum, I was anticipating contact, but they did a -- I mean, it was a hell of a throw. It was a hell of a throw, great tag. Great play by them to take advantage of the situation. "But yeah, I definitely overcommitted too much on getting my momentum going to try and get to 2nd if there was a ball in the infield or score if there was a ball in the gap. "So yeah, it's really tough to kind of take ourselves out of the inning like that from just playing too far over my skis, so to speak. I feel awful."

Pete Alonso was sitting at his locker in the Orioles' clubhouse during media availability postgame, ready to address getting picked off to end the 8th inning and noting that he felt "awful." "I over-anticipated contact in the zone. For me, I kind of had a pretty big primary lead with 2 outs. There's multiple things I wanted to do. "I wanted to be able to get to 2nd if there was a ball hit to the infield, beat the throw, and then also, too, if there's a ball hit in the outfield -- either in the gap or down the line -- I would give myself the best chance to score. "So it was kind of my momentum, I was anticipating contact, but they did a -- I mean, it was a hell of a throw. It was a hell of a throw, great tag. Great play by them to take advantage of the situation. "But yeah, I definitely overcommitted too much on getting my momentum going to try and get to 2nd if there was a ball in the infield or score if there was a ball in the gap. "So yeah, it's really tough to kind of take ourselves out of the inning like that from just playing too far over my skis, so to speak. I feel awful."

Jake Rill

247,378 views • 4 months ago

8v6 | Build Up vs Pressing | Phase of Play ⚽️ Created On: Sport Session Planner #SundayShare #SundayShare ✅ Build up vs Press. 🧱Set-Up: ➡️ On half a pitch, set up the playing area as shown. Across the halfway line, bolt on a 5-yard scoring zone. ➡️ Place a pair of mini-goals centrally, and position escape gates in the wide zones of the pitch. ➡️ At the opposite end, have a larger goal defender by a GK (🟢 👕 Teams: ⚫️s vs 🔴s plus 🟢 (GK) 🛝How to Play: ☑️ The 🔴s play out from the back and score by dribbling through a wide gate, or scoring 1st time off a set into the mini goals. No players are allowed to enter the red zone. ☑️ The ⚫️s press, regain possession of the ball, and score in the larger goal. 🚧 Constraints: 🏆Reward: Double points a regain and a finish within 6 seconds. 👨‍🏫 Review: The collective press of the ⚫️s. 🚫 Restriction: The 🔴s only have 5 passes to score. @Tactica1Thinker Lloyd Owers Osku Partonen 205 Academy The Sporting Resource Peter Prickett | TheBeardedCoach Jamie Birch SessionShare @ExchangeCoaches Mo Hicham Souisse 🇺🇸 🇲🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Allenaremania.com The Coaching Family

8v6 | Build Up vs Pressing | Phase of Play ⚽️ Created On: Sport Session Planner #SundayShare #SundayShare ✅ Build up vs Press. 🧱Set-Up: ➡️ On half a pitch, set up the playing area as shown. Across the halfway line, bolt on a 5-yard scoring zone. ➡️ Place a pair of mini-goals centrally, and position escape gates in the wide zones of the pitch. ➡️ At the opposite end, have a larger goal defender by a GK (🟢 👕 Teams: ⚫️s vs 🔴s plus 🟢 (GK) 🛝How to Play: ☑️ The 🔴s play out from the back and score by dribbling through a wide gate, or scoring 1st time off a set into the mini goals. No players are allowed to enter the red zone. ☑️ The ⚫️s press, regain possession of the ball, and score in the larger goal. 🚧 Constraints: 🏆Reward: Double points a regain and a finish within 6 seconds. 👨‍🏫 Review: The collective press of the ⚫️s. 🚫 Restriction: The 🔴s only have 5 passes to score. @Tactica1Thinker Lloyd Owers Osku Partonen 205 Academy The Sporting Resource Peter Prickett | TheBeardedCoach Jamie Birch SessionShare @ExchangeCoaches Mo Hicham Souisse 🇺🇸 🇲🇦 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Allenaremania.com The Coaching Family

JUST COACH

15,938 views • 11 months ago

Can you beat the top score? Get the top score on Swipe the cat and win an Apple Gift Card (link on my profile) 🥇 Get top score: $300 Apple Gift Card Best video submission: $200 Apple Gift Card Funniest submission: $100 Apple Gift Card Rules: 1) Post your score to X with an attached screenshot (required) or video (optional) of your best score (NOT the leaderboard). See example. To be eligible you must either tag me in your post or reply to this post. Reposts are optional for visibility and do not affect eligibility 2) Entries must be posted to X before December 10, 2025 @ 11:59pm AEDT (Australian Eastern Daylight time). 3) Your score must be listed on the ranked leaderboard. You may be asked to validate your score by providing your Game Center username. Be sure your profile is public, that you are playing on the latest version of the game and are logged into Game Center. 4) The highest score posted wins the top score prize. In the event that multiple winners get the same top score the winnings will be divided amongst them. So 2 people getting the same top score means prize will be $150 each. 5) Best video submission will be judged by me and my decision will be final. Criteria: I will be looking for creativity, entertainment value, style and originality. The entry that stands out the most from other video submissions. 6) Best funniest submission will be judged by me and my decision will be final. You may include an optional video for extra visibility. Criteria will be: what makes me laugh the most. Only age appropriate entries will be considered (no crude humour). 7) Gift cards are in USD. Gift card value may be subject to currency conversion for my local currency (Australia) and your local currency. Depending on the arrangement we find to send you the Gift card. Apple Gift Cards must be redeemable in your region. If not we will arrange an alternative of equivalent value. 8) Winners will be notified by direct message on X and publicly on my X profile on or before December 15. Winners must respond within 7 days to claim their prize. 9) You may enter the competition as many times as you like. Only your highest valid score will be considered for the Top Score prize. 10) You must be 13+ or meet your region’s minimum age for using X and participating in online competitions. 11) I reserve the right to disqualify suspicious or unverifiable scores at my discretion (e.g., if I suspect hacked/modded devices/assisting devices). Important disclaimers: This competition is not affiliated with Apple or X By entering into this competition you give me permission to use the contents of your post (name, text, image, video) for use in promotional material for the game. This content will be used on my YouTube channel and to promote my game not only on X but on other platforms too. If you do not wish to give permission to use your post text, images and/or video please opt-out on your submitted post. "I do not give permission for my post to be used in promotional material". Opting out of promotional use does not disqualify you from winning.

Adam Lyttle

159,986 views • 9 months ago

A guy making $1m a year with an 810 credit score just got automatically denied for business funding the bank didn't even look at his income. they didn't look at his perfect payment history. a computer auto declined him in 4 seconds because he didn't know how to apply correctly every major bank looks for specific things that make up your credit score, they also look at business structuring, your industry risk code, and 100+ other data points that can lead up to $250k at 0% interest or a flat our denial or 5k blue balls limit your score is irrelevant if you don't match the ideal profile the banks look for. getting funded means knowing the bank's algorithm before you submit the application, and having the connection to get your foot in the door (insider bankers) every time you apply and guess wrong, you take a hard inquiry and lower your score for absolutely nothing (luckily you can wipe these if you know how) if you know the rules, you know the bank's answer before you even apply. you just line them up and collect the approvals I built a tool that maps the algorithms for you, builds the sequence, and helps you execute AI Funding GPT. upload your credit report, it cross checks your file against every bank's hidden rules. tells you who will say yes today, how much they'll give you, and the exact sequence to apply in + data points giving it away tonight for free: like + repost comment STACK follow me or the dm bounces link in bio if you'd rather we just build the 0% stack for you. up to 250k if you're 700+

hunter

11,659 views • 1 month ago

Colin Albert’s lawyer’s statement about not knowing where Colin is going to basic training seemed like bullshit, because before I left for the Army, I knew exactly where I was going for basic. However… Before you join the Army you have to take an ASVAB, the military’s intelligence test. It’s a test that someone with a 9th grade education can pass. It’s a test that determines what MOS (jobs) you are intelligent enough to qualify for. You can’t pick your job without a passing it, and if you don’t have a job, you don’t know where you are going for basic. Basically by telling everyone that Colin has a three week prep course AND doesn’t know where he is going to basic, he is saying that while Colin may have been smart enough to be accepted to Bridgewater State University, Colin is not smart enough to be a private in the Army. When I joined there was a guy with me that was going to be a Laundry Technician, which I thought was made up. I asked why he picked that. It was because it was the only thing he could get based on his low ASVAB score. That means Colin is so stupid that he isn’t even qualified to be a 92S - Shower, Laundry, and Clothing Repair Specialist.

Colin Albert’s lawyer’s statement about not knowing where Colin is going to basic training seemed like bullshit, because before I left for the Army, I knew exactly where I was going for basic. However… Before you join the Army you have to take an ASVAB, the military’s intelligence test. It’s a test that someone with a 9th grade education can pass. It’s a test that determines what MOS (jobs) you are intelligent enough to qualify for. You can’t pick your job without a passing it, and if you don’t have a job, you don’t know where you are going for basic. Basically by telling everyone that Colin has a three week prep course AND doesn’t know where he is going to basic, he is saying that while Colin may have been smart enough to be accepted to Bridgewater State University, Colin is not smart enough to be a private in the Army. When I joined there was a guy with me that was going to be a Laundry Technician, which I thought was made up. I asked why he picked that. It was because it was the only thing he could get based on his low ASVAB score. That means Colin is so stupid that he isn’t even qualified to be a 92S - Shower, Laundry, and Clothing Repair Specialist.

David

56,734 views • 3 months ago

Despite clear video evidence, Tony Grossi remains adamant that Shedeur Sanders did NOT throw any touchdowns against the Bills in joint practice. "There were not touchdown passes by Shedeur yesterday. Live with it, realize it, accept it." Sanders connected downfield with Malachi Corley on a play where Corley easily scored. Later, Sanders threw a screen to KC Concepcion, who hit the crease for a score. People are making this QB Tracker drama about specific QBs; the part that we’re missing by doing this is…the BROWNS scored against the Bills defense. KC, Corley, these young guys made plays in this scrimmage that should be celebrated by fans; not scrutinized because of who threw the pass.

Despite clear video evidence, Tony Grossi remains adamant that Shedeur Sanders did NOT throw any touchdowns against the Bills in joint practice. "There were not touchdown passes by Shedeur yesterday. Live with it, realize it, accept it." Sanders connected downfield with Malachi Corley on a play where Corley easily scored. Later, Sanders threw a screen to KC Concepcion, who hit the crease for a score. People are making this QB Tracker drama about specific QBs; the part that we’re missing by doing this is…the BROWNS scored against the Bills defense. KC, Corley, these young guys made plays in this scrimmage that should be celebrated by fans; not scrutinized because of who threw the pass.

The Dawgs - A Cleveland Browns Podcast

210,634 views • 1 month ago

people wanted to see a clip of the scene so here! i just know the compression is gonna be bad so bear with me, also i didn't fully design the area just that portion where the camera was originally set... would you believe this entire scene is only 4k tris?

people wanted to see a clip of the scene so here! i just know the compression is gonna be bad so bear with me, also i didn't fully design the area just that portion where the camera was originally set... would you believe this entire scene is only 4k tris?

roy

19,268 views • 1 year ago

Manuel Neuer was asked to choose between Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi as the best player, and this was his response: 🗣️ Manuel Neuer: “Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi are both monsters and great players. Of course, we all know they are two different types of players. I was privileged to play against both of them during my career, especially when they were in their prime, but I have to say I suffered more against Cristiano Ronaldo than Lionel Messi. No matter how tight or strong our defense was, he always found a way to score. I think he is the player who has scored more goals against me than any other player I’ve faced. Cristiano can score with his left foot, right foot, and head. He can score all types of goals and even create space for his teammates. So, for me, I would pick Cristiano Ronaldo over Lionel Messi because he’s just a different breed the most complete player I’ve ever seen.”

Manuel Neuer was asked to choose between Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi as the best player, and this was his response: 🗣️ Manuel Neuer: “Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi are both monsters and great players. Of course, we all know they are two different types of players. I was privileged to play against both of them during my career, especially when they were in their prime, but I have to say I suffered more against Cristiano Ronaldo than Lionel Messi. No matter how tight or strong our defense was, he always found a way to score. I think he is the player who has scored more goals against me than any other player I’ve faced. Cristiano can score with his left foot, right foot, and head. He can score all types of goals and even create space for his teammates. So, for me, I would pick Cristiano Ronaldo over Lionel Messi because he’s just a different breed the most complete player I’ve ever seen.”

SIR1⭐️

44,465 views • 1 month ago

PSA: $NAM Airdrop 🪂 - only a few hours left ➡️Claim closes on: 12th of Jan 2024, at 9am ➡️ The _ONLY_ place to claim ➡️Allocations have been adjusted recently - check if you have claimed to see if your number went up! ➡️US is sadly geoblocked 🔸Eligibility and How to Claim reminder ➡️ $OSMO snapshot: mainnet block 12146298 ➡️ $ATOM snapshots: block 17660694 (the last blocks before 1st of November 2023). To be eligible you need to have at least $100 USD staked ➡️In $OSMO: 280 $OSMO ➡️In $ATOM: 12.786667 $ATOM Beyond staking every account gets an Activity Score. The TLDR; of this scoring method is that it measures the engagement of the account on a decentralized network. The specific framework used in the RPGF Drop is an adaptation from Trusta AI ' Media Score, and was first introduced by Celestia on the Genesis Drop. Based on the mechanism, the score can be a minimum of 1.5 and a maximum of 15. The Activity Score is a points system that takes into account activity such as transactions, ibc transfers, the value of transactions, months active, etc. (the scoring details are linked in the announcement). The maximum points you can get on the Activity Score is 15. To determine the tier, the amount staked at the time is multiplied by the Activity Score. Then all eligible accounts are ranked by highest value to lowest and grouped into tiers: top 10%, 50-90%, and 0-50% ➡️Source: MEDIA SCORE as the Infrastructure for On-chain User Value Assessment: 🔸How to claim $NAM airdrop ➡️Get Namada Wallet Extension ➡️Go to ➡️Connect Wallet $ATOM $OSMO $STARS ➡️Connect $NAM Extension ➡️CLAIM $NAM ➡️Repeat for any additional chains / wallets 🔸Looking for an easy and super clear "how to claim video"? @L1am_Crypto & Stakecito Labs to the rescue 🫡 🔸$NAM airdrop beraindex overview: 🔸Stake $ATOM with our sponsor, Enigma , and don't miss out on future Airdrops 🥩 $ATOM 🫡

PSA: $NAM Airdrop 🪂 - only a few hours left ➡️Claim closes on: 12th of Jan 2024, at 9am ➡️ The _ONLY_ place to claim ➡️Allocations have been adjusted recently - check if you have claimed to see if your number went up! ➡️US is sadly geoblocked 🔸Eligibility and How to Claim reminder ➡️ $OSMO snapshot: mainnet block 12146298 ➡️ $ATOM snapshots: block 17660694 (the last blocks before 1st of November 2023). To be eligible you need to have at least $100 USD staked ➡️In $OSMO: 280 $OSMO ➡️In $ATOM: 12.786667 $ATOM Beyond staking every account gets an Activity Score. The TLDR; of this scoring method is that it measures the engagement of the account on a decentralized network. The specific framework used in the RPGF Drop is an adaptation from Trusta AI ' Media Score, and was first introduced by Celestia on the Genesis Drop. Based on the mechanism, the score can be a minimum of 1.5 and a maximum of 15. The Activity Score is a points system that takes into account activity such as transactions, ibc transfers, the value of transactions, months active, etc. (the scoring details are linked in the announcement). The maximum points you can get on the Activity Score is 15. To determine the tier, the amount staked at the time is multiplied by the Activity Score. Then all eligible accounts are ranked by highest value to lowest and grouped into tiers: top 10%, 50-90%, and 0-50% ➡️Source: MEDIA SCORE as the Infrastructure for On-chain User Value Assessment: 🔸How to claim $NAM airdrop ➡️Get Namada Wallet Extension ➡️Go to ➡️Connect Wallet $ATOM $OSMO $STARS ➡️Connect $NAM Extension ➡️CLAIM $NAM ➡️Repeat for any additional chains / wallets 🔸Looking for an easy and super clear "how to claim video"? @L1am_Crypto & Stakecito Labs to the rescue 🫡 🔸$NAM airdrop beraindex overview: 🔸Stake $ATOM with our sponsor, Enigma , and don't miss out on future Airdrops 🥩 $ATOM 🫡

Grey Ledger

60,319 views • 2 years ago

The Pirates lost a Paul Skenes start for the 7th straight time last night…... Look at the box score and you think Paul continues to be the victim of poor run support…. Watch the game and you know Paul is competing with diminished stuff… Paul is at his best when he throws the baseball with the muscles of motor tract 1….He’s used the muscles of motor tract 5 for the majority of this season. Follow Paul’s back knee in each instance… 97 MPH fastball on left vs Rockies last night compared to 100 MPH fastball vs Rockies in August of 2025 on the right.

The Pirates lost a Paul Skenes start for the 7th straight time last night…... Look at the box score and you think Paul continues to be the victim of poor run support…. Watch the game and you know Paul is competing with diminished stuff… Paul is at his best when he throws the baseball with the muscles of motor tract 1….He’s used the muscles of motor tract 5 for the majority of this season. Follow Paul’s back knee in each instance… 97 MPH fastball on left vs Rockies last night compared to 100 MPH fastball vs Rockies in August of 2025 on the right.

Prehension Athletics

143,681 views • 3 months ago

🙏♥️🙏 Back in 1952, a baby was born at a hospital in New York. The room went dead silent. The infant was blue, limp, and silent. Panic began to settle over the medical staff, and for a terrifying moment, it looked like they might give up. Then, a steady, calm voice cut through the tension. «Let's score the baby,» the woman commanded. That woman was Dr. Virginia Apgar. That single, simple instruction changed the course of modern medicine forever. Virginia Apgar's path wasn't easy. She originally wanted to be a surgeon, but in the 1940s, the doors to operating rooms were firmly shut against women. She was told plainly that no hospital would hire a woman as a surgeon. Many people would have quit right there, but Apgar simply shifted her focus. She moved into the field of anesthesiology. It was a career pivot that would eventually save millions of lives. While working in the maternity ward at Columbia-Presbyterian, Apgar watched something that broke her heart. She saw newborn babies dying within minutes of birth because doctors didn't have a standardized way to check if they were healthy or in distress. It was all guesswork. There was no system, no set of rules, and no shared language among the staff. One morning in 1952, Apgar decided to solve the problem herself. She sat down with a piece of paper and a pen. She developed a simple, five-point test to evaluate a newborn's health based on heart rate, respiration, muscle tone, reflexes, and skin color. She called it the "Apgar Score." The medical community didn't just accept it; they embraced it. Within a decade, nearly every hospital in the United States had adopted her method. Because doctors finally had a universal language to assess a newborn's health, they knew exactly when to intervene. The infant mortality rate plummeted. Infants who might have been left for dead in the past were suddenly being resuscitated and kept alive. Virginia Apgar didn't stop with that one test. She went on to get a degree in Public Health and worked tirelessly with the March of Dimes, becoming a global advocate for mothers and their children. She spent her life breaking barriers, not by shouting, but by being the most capable person in the room. Because doctors finally had a universal language to assess a newborn's health, they knew exactly when to intervene. The infant mortality rate plummeted—studies have estimated that the implementation of standardized neonatal assessments contributed to a significant decline in neonatal deaths, with some regions seeing mortality rates for high-risk infants drop by as much as 40 to 50 percent in the years following its adoption. Infants who might have been left for dead in the past were suddenly being resuscitated and kept alive. When people asked her how she managed to thrive in a world that didn't want her there, she would offer a small, knowing smile. She once explained her resilience by saying: «Women are like tea bags—you never know how strong they are until they're in hot water.» Dr. Virginia Apgar passed away in 1974, but her work remains invisible yet essential. Every two seconds, somewhere on this planet, a baby takes its first breath. In that moment, a doctor or a nurse silently calculates a score. That number is a tribute to a woman who refused to give up—not on the babies, and certainly not on herself. vision, and a refusal to back down can rewrite the future. She taught us that your circumstances don't define your impact; your actions do. Most people will never know the name of the woman behind the score they receive at birth. But every life she helped save is living proof that you don't need fame to be a hero—you just need to leave the world better than you found it 🙏♥️🙏

🙏♥️🙏 Back in 1952, a baby was born at a hospital in New York. The room went dead silent. The infant was blue, limp, and silent. Panic began to settle over the medical staff, and for a terrifying moment, it looked like they might give up. Then, a steady, calm voice cut through the tension. «Let's score the baby,» the woman commanded. That woman was Dr. Virginia Apgar. That single, simple instruction changed the course of modern medicine forever. Virginia Apgar's path wasn't easy. She originally wanted to be a surgeon, but in the 1940s, the doors to operating rooms were firmly shut against women. She was told plainly that no hospital would hire a woman as a surgeon. Many people would have quit right there, but Apgar simply shifted her focus. She moved into the field of anesthesiology. It was a career pivot that would eventually save millions of lives. While working in the maternity ward at Columbia-Presbyterian, Apgar watched something that broke her heart. She saw newborn babies dying within minutes of birth because doctors didn't have a standardized way to check if they were healthy or in distress. It was all guesswork. There was no system, no set of rules, and no shared language among the staff. One morning in 1952, Apgar decided to solve the problem herself. She sat down with a piece of paper and a pen. She developed a simple, five-point test to evaluate a newborn's health based on heart rate, respiration, muscle tone, reflexes, and skin color. She called it the "Apgar Score." The medical community didn't just accept it; they embraced it. Within a decade, nearly every hospital in the United States had adopted her method. Because doctors finally had a universal language to assess a newborn's health, they knew exactly when to intervene. The infant mortality rate plummeted. Infants who might have been left for dead in the past were suddenly being resuscitated and kept alive. Virginia Apgar didn't stop with that one test. She went on to get a degree in Public Health and worked tirelessly with the March of Dimes, becoming a global advocate for mothers and their children. She spent her life breaking barriers, not by shouting, but by being the most capable person in the room. Because doctors finally had a universal language to assess a newborn's health, they knew exactly when to intervene. The infant mortality rate plummeted—studies have estimated that the implementation of standardized neonatal assessments contributed to a significant decline in neonatal deaths, with some regions seeing mortality rates for high-risk infants drop by as much as 40 to 50 percent in the years following its adoption. Infants who might have been left for dead in the past were suddenly being resuscitated and kept alive. When people asked her how she managed to thrive in a world that didn't want her there, she would offer a small, knowing smile. She once explained her resilience by saying: «Women are like tea bags—you never know how strong they are until they're in hot water.» Dr. Virginia Apgar passed away in 1974, but her work remains invisible yet essential. Every two seconds, somewhere on this planet, a baby takes its first breath. In that moment, a doctor or a nurse silently calculates a score. That number is a tribute to a woman who refused to give up—not on the babies, and certainly not on herself. vision, and a refusal to back down can rewrite the future. She taught us that your circumstances don't define your impact; your actions do. Most people will never know the name of the woman behind the score they receive at birth. But every life she helped save is living proof that you don't need fame to be a hero—you just need to leave the world better than you found it 🙏♥️🙏

G-PA

22,373 views • 6 months ago