Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The Left-liberals who hate and abuse Hinduism know they cannot attack it directly and so they attack Hindutva instead, conveniently ignoring Supreme court's assertion that Hindutva is the essence of Hinduism and signifies Indian culture. My views on why Himanta Biswa Sarma is correct:

182,453 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

Suraj Balakrishnan's profile picture
Suraj Balakrishnan1 year ago

@himantabiswa Repeat after me — Hindutva is nothing but Hinduism that resists. Hindutva must be preserved for the long term well-being of Bharat.

Artisan Crafted's profile picture
Artisan Crafted2 years ago

LAB CERTIFIED 108+1 Bead Indian Origin Rudraksha Mala 5 mukhi 5 faces Lord Shivas Rosary Jaap Mala Yoga Prayer Healing Meditation 8mm approx

Sangeeta Tripathi Mandal's profile picture
Sangeeta Tripathi Mandal1 year ago

@himantabiswa Our unity will be our strength that will boomerang on THEM . Hindus of the World must unite .

Ankit's profile picture
Ankit1 year ago

@himantabiswa Thought-provoking. Hindutva's meaning is debated and used per convenience - cultural essence or political ideology?

SanataniLawyer's profile picture
SanataniLawyer1 year ago

They pick on Hindutva, dressing it up as a political boogeyman, all while hoping no one notices the fact that their selective outrage reeks of bad faith. They’re not just attacking an idea - they’re waging a shadow war on India’s very identity. And that’s a fight they’ll never win.

GUMNAMIBABA's profile picture
GUMNAMIBABA1 year ago

@himantabiswa Fact

vinit shenoy's profile picture
vinit shenoy1 year ago

@himantabiswa Atheist defending Hinduism, my Idea of India ♥️

khan's profile picture
khan1 year ago

@himantabiswa Cry loudly

Soham_R@2003's profile picture
Soham_R@20031 year ago

@himantabiswa When was the last time Marxists showed respect for Pagans? Perhaps before Karl Marx was born.

Preeti Mishra's profile picture
Preeti Mishra1 year ago

Anandji, you are absolutely right. After Mahakhumb Mela and Isha (satguru) gatherings on Mahashivratri leftist, kabal, khan market, vampanthis, congress, SP other will pull their socks up and target Hinduisum and Sanatanis more vocally. Hindu religion followers or practising should open their eyes b4 its late. Your quotes and answers in debates are full of truth.

Anoop Sharma (नासमझ बेचारा 🤔🙃)'s profile picture
Anoop Sharma (नासमझ बेचारा 🤔🙃)1 year ago

Great to see Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma’s clarity on Hindutva, backed by the Supreme Court’s take on it as the essence of Indian culture not enmity. Yet, it’s a fine line between accepting diversity with grace and rejecting anything that doesn’t fit the phrase of a singular ideology. True strength lies in that balance.

Related Videos

Mahua Moitra & J Sai Deepak's Fiery Exchange Over Hindutva & Hinduism “Hindutva Exists Because…” The Debate 2026 by the Calcutta Debating Circle sets the stage for a charged and unfiltered clash on one of India’s most polarising questions: “Hinduism Needs Protection From Hindutva.” A fiery face-off between TMC MP Mahua Moitra and legal scholar J Sai Deepak as they lock horns over faith, politics, identity, and the future of Indian democracy. Sharp arguments, ideological fault lines, and no easy answers. This is a debate that cuts to the core of contemporary India. Moitra took jibes at her senior Swapan Da, which obviously people found uncalled for and not funny at all. J Sai Deepak, opposing the motion, he argued that Hinduism actually needs protection from secularism, rather than Hindutva. He challenged the narrative that Hindutva began with V.D. Savarkar in 1923. Instead, he traced its roots to 19th-century Bengal (1860s–1909) as an “organic Shakta response” to colonial invasion, citing figures like Bankim Chandra Chatterjee and Sri Aurobindo. He countered claims that Hindutva is “hyper-masculine” or strictly “Brahminical vegetarian,” asserting that Bengali masculinity and Shakta traditions (which include offerings of meat and alcohol) are foundational to Hindutva. J Sai Deepak argued that Hindutva is a civilizational necessity that translates into a political vision, and that it is unconstitutional to deny political representation to Hindutva while allowing it for other ideologies like communism. The event featured sharp rebuttals against co-debaters Mani Shankar Aiyar and Mahua Moitra. He accused Aiyar of conflating Hindutva solely with Savarkar and questioned Moitra on whether she had similar critiques for non-Hindu worldviews. The debate, which also featured Sudhanshu Trivedi and Ashutosh, concluded with the audience overwhelmingly voting against the motion, supporting J Sai Deepak's stance. In no way Moitra could’ve matched J Sai, nowhere near and totally decimated. Credit : ANI.

Augadh

99,846 views • 2 months ago