Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

VIDEO | "There is a big difference between Hindutva and Hinduism. Hindutva is about feeling of hatred, which Savarkar used to spread in the 40's, which aimed to establish hegemony of Hindus, and the philosophy was about India being of the Hindus and for the Hindus. Hinduism, like Islam,...

164,805 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

9 Yorum

iNational iNdic🇮Country | Culture | Civilisation profil fotoğrafı
iNational iNdic🇮Country | Culture | Civilisation1 yıl önce

, your double standards are appalling! You condemn Hinduism and question Lord Ram, but would you dare criticize Islam or Allah in the same manner? Your hypocrisy is staggering. How dare you disparage Shri Ram and Hinduism, while hiding behind the security of a tolerant nation? You cry foul when a member of your community faces a minor incident, but remain silent on the ongoing #genocide of Hindus in Bangladesh, further exposing your selective outrage. Let's not forget, if someone made similar statements about Islam in an Islamic country, they'd face severe consequences, including beheading. You made such disparaging statement on Sri Ram and Hindus because you know this Hindu-majority country allows free speech even if that amount to giving freedom for hate-speech and genocide call. You and your ilk know it well, come want may Hindus won't behead anybody for insultinting their faith. That's why you and all Hindu-haters worth their salt are using it as a license to insult our faith and our gods. Try using the similar euphemism for Muhammad and Islam and see your co-religionists serving your head on a plate to your mother, like Aurangzeb had beheaded Dara Sikoh and sent his head on a plate to his jailed father Shahjahan. Yes, the same guy who built the so-called memorial of ❤️ Day aka Taj Mahal after his 4th wife Mumtaz died delivering their 14th child. Then that pervert went on to marry his own biological daughter who looked after Mumtaz. So those born and brought up in the ideological and moral cesspool, shouldn't and mustn't resort to virtue signalling to at least Hindus.

Stop Hindu Hate Advocacy Network (SHHAN) profil fotoğrafı
Stop Hindu Hate Advocacy Network (SHHAN)1 yıl önce

Iltaja Mufti is an Islamist living in a state that is 90% Islamic that has seen a genocide of Hindus from that state. She should stop gaslighting Hindus. We don't want Muslims and Christians to teach is what Hinduism is.

Yash Rawat profil fotoğrafı
Yash Rawat1 yıl önce

Why is Iltija Mufti giving gyaan on Hinduism in the first place?

shiv_cybersurg profil fotoğrafı
shiv_cybersurg1 yıl önce

Bullshit

Nitendra profil fotoğrafı
Nitendra1 yıl önce

Aunty, why do all terrorists blow themselves up while chanting ‘All@h hu Akb@r’? 🤣🤣 Do they follow a different Islam than you? Do they follow a different Prophet Muhammad than the one you follow?

JabarDasti profil fotoğrafı
JabarDasti1 yıl önce

true !! there is a big difference!! hindutva makes you feel bharatiya, the "-tva" suffix is from sanskrit hinduism makes you feel colonial indian, the "-ism" suffix is from ainglees #IAmRightWhenIAmRight 😂😂

X profil fotoğrafı
X1 yıl önce

𝐇𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐮 == 𝐇𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐮𝐭𝐯𝐚 == 𝐇𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐮𝐢𝐬𝐦. Anyone saying there is a difference wants to manipulate Hindus. Just like women manipulate men by saying, "real men" do this, do that. Both are trying to manipulate.

T R Sriniwas profil fotoğrafı
T R Sriniwas1 yıl önce

This lady is politically unemployed and her mother is nowhere to be seen in the valley politics. This lady at best can shout some pet social media slogans on Hindutva , where she and Pappu don't know the actual meaning . Better to keep quiet.

Sagar Khandelwal profil fotoğrafı
Sagar Khandelwal1 yıl önce

The statement “Islam is a religion that promotes secularism” is a myth, especially considering the phrase “La ilaha illallah,” which declares that Allah is the only God. There are 21 countries in the world that are officially recognized as “Islamic Republics,” so where does the idea of Islam promoting secularism come from? Why is secularism emphasized only in India, where Hindus are in the majority and cannot dominate the entire political system? What kind of secularism is Islam promoting here? @IltijaMufti_

Benzer Videolar

Mahua Moitra & J Sai Deepak's Fiery Exchange Over Hindutva & Hinduism “Hindutva Exists Because…” The Debate 2026 by the Calcutta Debating Circle sets the stage for a charged and unfiltered clash on one of India’s most polarising questions: “Hinduism Needs Protection From Hindutva.” A fiery face-off between TMC MP Mahua Moitra and legal scholar J Sai Deepak as they lock horns over faith, politics, identity, and the future of Indian democracy. Sharp arguments, ideological fault lines, and no easy answers. This is a debate that cuts to the core of contemporary India. Moitra took jibes at her senior Swapan Da, which obviously people found uncalled for and not funny at all. J Sai Deepak, opposing the motion, he argued that Hinduism actually needs protection from secularism, rather than Hindutva. He challenged the narrative that Hindutva began with V.D. Savarkar in 1923. Instead, he traced its roots to 19th-century Bengal (1860s–1909) as an “organic Shakta response” to colonial invasion, citing figures like Bankim Chandra Chatterjee and Sri Aurobindo. He countered claims that Hindutva is “hyper-masculine” or strictly “Brahminical vegetarian,” asserting that Bengali masculinity and Shakta traditions (which include offerings of meat and alcohol) are foundational to Hindutva. J Sai Deepak argued that Hindutva is a civilizational necessity that translates into a political vision, and that it is unconstitutional to deny political representation to Hindutva while allowing it for other ideologies like communism. The event featured sharp rebuttals against co-debaters Mani Shankar Aiyar and Mahua Moitra. He accused Aiyar of conflating Hindutva solely with Savarkar and questioned Moitra on whether she had similar critiques for non-Hindu worldviews. The debate, which also featured Sudhanshu Trivedi and Ashutosh, concluded with the audience overwhelmingly voting against the motion, supporting J Sai Deepak's stance. In no way Moitra could’ve matched J Sai, nowhere near and totally decimated. Credit : ANI.

Augadh

100,347 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce