Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The Liberals have been using the CPP & QPP's assets in their calculations to show that the federal debt is lower than it is. It's not only creative accounting but a straight-up lie. I've been calling this out for years and glad to see it now mentioned on CBC...

KirkLubimov's profile picture

Kirk Lubimov

64,648 subscribers

88,882 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

CARNEY IS LYING: He is telling you, “We have the lowest net-debt to GDP ratio in the G7” What he’s doing, is using OUR pensions, the CPP & QPP, and calling it an asset!! It’s a liability. They have to pay that out, to us. It’s OUR asset. THEIR liability. Any CFA, CPA, CA, will tell you: Net-debt is the biggest BS told. If you look at our TOTAL DEBT to GDP, we are among the LOWEST 7 out of 32 COUNTRIES!!!
2:18

CARNEY IS LYING: He is telling you, “We have the lowest net-debt to GDP ratio in the G7” What he’s doing, is using OUR pensions, the CPP & QPP, and calling it an asset!! It’s a liability. They have to pay that out, to us. It’s OUR asset. THEIR liability. Any CFA, CPA, CA, will tell you: Net-debt is the biggest BS told. If you look at our TOTAL DEBT to GDP, we are among the LOWEST 7 out of 32 COUNTRIES!!!

Mario Zelaya

93,935 views • 9 months ago

You’ve heard it said that Republicans are fiscally conservative and Democrats just want to spend. Is it true? Check out this chart on US debt. Surprised? We’re not. #DemsAbroad #VoteBlue #TrumpEconomy Details: Federal debt as a share of GDP, split by presidential party. Method: yearly change in debt/GDP is compounded only during the years each party held the presidency. When one party is in office, the other line stays flat. Data: FRED (GFDEGDQ188S), annualized from quarterly. Result: over this sample, Republicans accumulate more of the increase in the debt-to-GDP ratio.🧵
0:33

You’ve heard it said that Republicans are fiscally conservative and Democrats just want to spend. Is it true? Check out this chart on US debt. Surprised? We’re not. #DemsAbroad #VoteBlue #TrumpEconomy Details: Federal debt as a share of GDP, split by presidential party. Method: yearly change in debt/GDP is compounded only during the years each party held the presidency. When one party is in office, the other line stays flat. Data: FRED (GFDEGDQ188S), annualized from quarterly. Result: over this sample, Republicans accumulate more of the increase in the debt-to-GDP ratio.🧵

Democrats Abroad

29,841 views • 2 months ago

For the first time in 80 years, the federal debt-to-GDP ratio is over 100%. In the past, the rich used to pay higher taxes. Now, the government pays the rich interest on a swelling debt, caused largely by lower taxes on the rich. It's a big switcheroo. Watch.
3:17

For the first time in 80 years, the federal debt-to-GDP ratio is over 100%. In the past, the rich used to pay higher taxes. Now, the government pays the rich interest on a swelling debt, caused largely by lower taxes on the rich. It's a big switcheroo. Watch.

Robert Reich

45,218 views • 3 months ago

Jimi Wanjigi: We should not pay our debt; it is not only logical, but it is the only way we don’t die. We are dying as a complete nation. When we say odious, it is illegal debt that is costing us. This year alone, it is going to be 91 percent of the taxes that we contribute to the government. This year alone, for every Kenyan, it is 40,000 shillings they are paying. For every working Kenyan, it is 120,000 shillings, 10,000 shillings a month, you are paying to something that you did not approve. If this debt was not passed by Parliament, why should we pay it? #CitizenSundayLive
2:15

Jimi Wanjigi: We should not pay our debt; it is not only logical, but it is the only way we don’t die. We are dying as a complete nation. When we say odious, it is illegal debt that is costing us. This year alone, it is going to be 91 percent of the taxes that we contribute to the government. This year alone, for every Kenyan, it is 40,000 shillings they are paying. For every working Kenyan, it is 120,000 shillings, 10,000 shillings a month, you are paying to something that you did not approve. If this debt was not passed by Parliament, why should we pay it? #CitizenSundayLive

Citizen TV Kenya

22,940 views • 2 months ago

Trump: "You grow yourself out of that debt, it's not a question of paying it." The only way for the US to outgrow its debt is massive stimulus. Are you prepared?
0:44

Trump: "You grow yourself out of that debt, it's not a question of paying it." The only way for the US to outgrow its debt is massive stimulus. Are you prepared?

Satoshi Stacker

77,085 views • 10 months ago

Even CBC is calling out Carney’s creative accounting. They’re subtracting the Canada Pension Plan from our national debt to make the numbers look better. Suddenly our debt-to-GDP drops to just 10%. That’s not fiscal responsibility. That’s straight-up bogus accounting. You can’t use pension funds to pay government debt. Every serious economist knows it. The CBC panel didn’t hold back: “subtracting the Canada Pension Plan to calculate our national debt is totally bogus!” While they cook the books: • $67+ billion deficit this year • Interest payments already $54 billion+ and climbing fast • Tent cities exploding in Edmonton and across the country • Another $100 million heading to Palestine on top of $400 million already sent Canadians get the bill. Carney gets the creative math. This isn’t “building Canada strong.” This is hiding how badly they’re breaking it. #cdnpoli #CarneyFail #LiberalFail #DebtTrap #CanadaFirst
0:21

Even CBC is calling out Carney’s creative accounting. They’re subtracting the Canada Pension Plan from our national debt to make the numbers look better. Suddenly our debt-to-GDP drops to just 10%. That’s not fiscal responsibility. That’s straight-up bogus accounting. You can’t use pension funds to pay government debt. Every serious economist knows it. The CBC panel didn’t hold back: “subtracting the Canada Pension Plan to calculate our national debt is totally bogus!” While they cook the books: • $67+ billion deficit this year • Interest payments already $54 billion+ and climbing fast • Tent cities exploding in Edmonton and across the country • Another $100 million heading to Palestine on top of $400 million already sent Canadians get the bill. Carney gets the creative math. This isn’t “building Canada strong.” This is hiding how badly they’re breaking it. #cdnpoli #CarneyFail #LiberalFail #DebtTrap #CanadaFirst

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

53,239 views • 1 month ago

🚨 What will it take to knock some common sense into this government? Even Andrew Coyne on CBC’s At Issue isn’t holding back: Canada is in a **growth crisis** — and has been for years. The government is projecting just **1.7%** GDP growth per year. That’s **half** what we grew in the 80s. **A third** of what we grew in the 50s and 60s. And they seem “entirely unconcerned.” We’re also facing a rising debt-to-GDP ratio (federal + provinces). They use the old trick of subtracting CPP/QPP to claim it’s only “10%” — Coyne calls it a **“completely bogus comparison.”** No serious development policy. No sense of the seriousness of the situation. Same top-down complacency. You can’t finance an aging population, a major defense buildup, or anything else when your economy grows slower than your obligations. This is why per capita GDP has been flat or falling while we added record population through immigration. This is why **Winnipeg alone** has **8,248 people** experiencing homelessness as of March 2026 — with **4,468 in chronic homelessness**. Tents. Tarps. Garbage. Open addiction along the riverbanks. A goose walking through trash like it’s normal. **This is the result.** You can’t import record population growth, crush housing supply, kill productivity, hide debt with accounting tricks, and then act shocked when Canadian cities start looking like third-world encampments. The government needs to get deadly serious about **real growth** — not just more people. Secure the border. Cut the waste and red tape. Build homes and infrastructure like it’s wartime. Unleash productivity and private investment. **Canada First.** Before every city looks like this… and the debt bomb lands on our kids. #cdnpoli #CanadaFirst
2:01

🚨 What will it take to knock some common sense into this government? Even Andrew Coyne on CBC’s At Issue isn’t holding back: Canada is in a **growth crisis** — and has been for years. The government is projecting just **1.7%** GDP growth per year. That’s **half** what we grew in the 80s. **A third** of what we grew in the 50s and 60s. And they seem “entirely unconcerned.” We’re also facing a rising debt-to-GDP ratio (federal + provinces). They use the old trick of subtracting CPP/QPP to claim it’s only “10%” — Coyne calls it a **“completely bogus comparison.”** No serious development policy. No sense of the seriousness of the situation. Same top-down complacency. You can’t finance an aging population, a major defense buildup, or anything else when your economy grows slower than your obligations. This is why per capita GDP has been flat or falling while we added record population through immigration. This is why **Winnipeg alone** has **8,248 people** experiencing homelessness as of March 2026 — with **4,468 in chronic homelessness**. Tents. Tarps. Garbage. Open addiction along the riverbanks. A goose walking through trash like it’s normal. **This is the result.** You can’t import record population growth, crush housing supply, kill productivity, hide debt with accounting tricks, and then act shocked when Canadian cities start looking like third-world encampments. The government needs to get deadly serious about **real growth** — not just more people. Secure the border. Cut the waste and red tape. Build homes and infrastructure like it’s wartime. Unleash productivity and private investment. **Canada First.** Before every city looks like this… and the debt bomb lands on our kids. #cdnpoli #CanadaFirst

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

21,068 views • 1 month ago

UFO Revolution: S2E3 - 2027 and the Approaching Craft. Is it a Lie? "You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told." ~Corbell (Well, I was not expecting this. And right now, I don't know what to think. But we all know it's been hinted at by various folks, including Lue Elizondo. So what's going on?) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Your government now wants you to know one truth, and that truth is that UFOs are real. They've already done told you. Sometimes, when you want somebody to know a truth, it's so you can set them up to believe a lie, and that's coming. I have zero doubt that lie is coming." Producer: "What is the lie?" Corbell: "Specifically, you want me to say it right now, for real, real? On camera, to be put in the show?" Producer: "Yes." Corbell: "Okay. Problem with that: If we tell the lie before it's told, they can adapt. That wouldn't be wise. I'll tell you privately, but I would really think about if you want to put this in your show. For real. That's a real thing I'm telling you. So, will you think about it before putting it in your show?" Producer: "Absolutely." Corbell: "Okay. So UFOs are real, and they've been here a long time, and that's the truth. But the lie is coming. All indications, like ALL of them, is that that lie is going to be that there is a craft slowly making its way to us here on Earth. And that is the lie they're gonna want you to believe. "It's nuanced, how they explain that, the nature of that threat. But that 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told. You even got a date. People been whispering a date for a long time now. I know where that lie comes from. I know, specifically, what document from the 70s initiated the idea of that lie. A classified document. That is the lie you will be told. You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That's the lie. "Maybe I'm wrong. Hope I'm wrong. I sent you two texts today with a year (Messages showing 2027 are shown on a cell phone). Not from me. Nope, I'm not gonna propagate that lie. I'm not gonna be part of it, I'm not going to say it to the camera. Everybody knows. Just start paying attention. And they'll change the date - especially if they see this - things will change. Because maybe I'm trustworthy, maybe I'm worthy of your trust, maybe I've told you the truth the whole way through it and now and you can verify it. If that's the case, then I'm f**king dangerous. "You've been told the truth about UFOs for a long time now. It's been pretty orchestrated, it's been pretty clear, and it's using people that are telling the truth and wanna tell the truth. Ultimately, they want you to know something. They want you to know UFOs are real. Thank God, we're finally there, we're all there now. They want you to know the truth. But why [do] they want you to know that truth now. I hope I'm wrong, but it's terrifying. Think about it "Maybe it's good to get ahead of it, call it out now, before they do it. I'll be called crazy. That's okay."
3:47

UFO Revolution: S2E3 - 2027 and the Approaching Craft. Is it a Lie? "You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told." ~Corbell (Well, I was not expecting this. And right now, I don't know what to think. But we all know it's been hinted at by various folks, including Lue Elizondo. So what's going on?) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Your government now wants you to know one truth, and that truth is that UFOs are real. They've already done told you. Sometimes, when you want somebody to know a truth, it's so you can set them up to believe a lie, and that's coming. I have zero doubt that lie is coming." Producer: "What is the lie?" Corbell: "Specifically, you want me to say it right now, for real, real? On camera, to be put in the show?" Producer: "Yes." Corbell: "Okay. Problem with that: If we tell the lie before it's told, they can adapt. That wouldn't be wise. I'll tell you privately, but I would really think about if you want to put this in your show. For real. That's a real thing I'm telling you. So, will you think about it before putting it in your show?" Producer: "Absolutely." Corbell: "Okay. So UFOs are real, and they've been here a long time, and that's the truth. But the lie is coming. All indications, like ALL of them, is that that lie is going to be that there is a craft slowly making its way to us here on Earth. And that is the lie they're gonna want you to believe. "It's nuanced, how they explain that, the nature of that threat. But that 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told. You even got a date. People been whispering a date for a long time now. I know where that lie comes from. I know, specifically, what document from the 70s initiated the idea of that lie. A classified document. That is the lie you will be told. You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That's the lie. "Maybe I'm wrong. Hope I'm wrong. I sent you two texts today with a year (Messages showing 2027 are shown on a cell phone). Not from me. Nope, I'm not gonna propagate that lie. I'm not gonna be part of it, I'm not going to say it to the camera. Everybody knows. Just start paying attention. And they'll change the date - especially if they see this - things will change. Because maybe I'm trustworthy, maybe I'm worthy of your trust, maybe I've told you the truth the whole way through it and now and you can verify it. If that's the case, then I'm f**king dangerous. "You've been told the truth about UFOs for a long time now. It's been pretty orchestrated, it's been pretty clear, and it's using people that are telling the truth and wanna tell the truth. Ultimately, they want you to know something. They want you to know UFOs are real. Thank God, we're finally there, we're all there now. They want you to know the truth. But why [do] they want you to know that truth now. I hope I'm wrong, but it's terrifying. Think about it "Maybe it's good to get ahead of it, call it out now, before they do it. I'll be called crazy. That's okay."

Joe Murgia

763,115 views • 1 year ago

How out of control is US government spending? "Since 1800, there have been 52 countries that saw a Debt-to-GDP above 130%, 51 of those countries have defaulted." - Adam Kobeissi with Charles V Payne Currently, the US has a Debt-to-GDP ratio of 124% which is up over 20% since 2020. The US will be above that 130% threshold by 2033 based on the current trajectory. According to the US CBO itself, Debt-to-GDP is on track to hit 150%+ by 2050. Meanwhile, a $1.2 trillion budget was just passed and the debt ceiling is uncapped until 2025. How is this ever sustainable?
0:49

How out of control is US government spending? "Since 1800, there have been 52 countries that saw a Debt-to-GDP above 130%, 51 of those countries have defaulted." - Adam Kobeissi with Charles V Payne Currently, the US has a Debt-to-GDP ratio of 124% which is up over 20% since 2020. The US will be above that 130% threshold by 2033 based on the current trajectory. According to the US CBO itself, Debt-to-GDP is on track to hit 150%+ by 2050. Meanwhile, a $1.2 trillion budget was just passed and the debt ceiling is uncapped until 2025. How is this ever sustainable?

The Kobeissi Letter

253,615 views • 2 years ago

🚨🇺🇸Jim Rickards: 'US debt will NEVER be paid off, nor will the deficit' 'The US' debt is never going down. The deficit will never be paid off. Talk about that is nonsense, it doesn't matter. Here's what does matter: the debt-to-GDP ratio. That's the number to watch. Right now, that ratio is at an all-time high. That's not a good thing. But the point is what Scott Bessent is trying to do, and Miran is contributing to this, which is trying to reduce the ratio. If you do that, then you have a sustainable situation.' -James Rickards joins us on Monday's Going Underground to discuss the Trump Administration's economic blueprint that you haven't heard of, and the Ukraine proxy war Don't miss it, follow our Rumble 🏴‍☠️ channel, link below in the replies👇
2:01

🚨🇺🇸Jim Rickards: 'US debt will NEVER be paid off, nor will the deficit' 'The US' debt is never going down. The deficit will never be paid off. Talk about that is nonsense, it doesn't matter. Here's what does matter: the debt-to-GDP ratio. That's the number to watch. Right now, that ratio is at an all-time high. That's not a good thing. But the point is what Scott Bessent is trying to do, and Miran is contributing to this, which is trying to reduce the ratio. If you do that, then you have a sustainable situation.' -James Rickards joins us on Monday's Going Underground to discuss the Trump Administration's economic blueprint that you haven't heard of, and the Ukraine proxy war Don't miss it, follow our Rumble 🏴‍☠️ channel, link below in the replies👇

Going Underground

59,123 views • 10 months ago

NEW: Jeff Bezos says he's 'very optimistic' about the incoming Trump administration, offering to help streamline regulations and dismissing concerns about Elon Musk leveraging government power against competitors. "I'm actually very optimistic this time around. He seems to have a lot of energy around reducing regulation and from my point of view, if I can help him do that, I'm going to help him because we do have too many regulations in this country." "If you look at the national debt and how gigantic it is as a portion of GDP, these are real long-term problems, and the way we get out of them is by outgrowing them. You're going to solve the problem of the national debt by making it a smaller percentage of GDP. Not by shrinking the national debt but by growing the GDP. You have to grow the denominator, and that means you have to grow GDP at, you know, 3, 4, or 5 percent a year." "If you can do that, this is a very manageable problem. So we need a growth orientation in this country. The most important thing is a growth mindset. And we are the luckiest country in the world. We have all these natural resources, including energy independence. We have the best risk capital system in the world..." "But we are burdened by excessive permitting and regulation. You can't build a bridge, and we see these examples all the time. I'm very optimistic that President Trump is serious about this regulatory agenda, and I think that he has a good chance of succeeding..." "You've probably grown in the last eight years. He has, too. What I've seen so far is that he is calmer than he was the first time, more confident, and more settled." Elon Musk Donald J. Trump Jeff Bezos
6:28

NEW: Jeff Bezos says he's 'very optimistic' about the incoming Trump administration, offering to help streamline regulations and dismissing concerns about Elon Musk leveraging government power against competitors. "I'm actually very optimistic this time around. He seems to have a lot of energy around reducing regulation and from my point of view, if I can help him do that, I'm going to help him because we do have too many regulations in this country." "If you look at the national debt and how gigantic it is as a portion of GDP, these are real long-term problems, and the way we get out of them is by outgrowing them. You're going to solve the problem of the national debt by making it a smaller percentage of GDP. Not by shrinking the national debt but by growing the GDP. You have to grow the denominator, and that means you have to grow GDP at, you know, 3, 4, or 5 percent a year." "If you can do that, this is a very manageable problem. So we need a growth orientation in this country. The most important thing is a growth mindset. And we are the luckiest country in the world. We have all these natural resources, including energy independence. We have the best risk capital system in the world..." "But we are burdened by excessive permitting and regulation. You can't build a bridge, and we see these examples all the time. I'm very optimistic that President Trump is serious about this regulatory agenda, and I think that he has a good chance of succeeding..." "You've probably grown in the last eight years. He has, too. What I've seen so far is that he is calmer than he was the first time, more confident, and more settled." Elon Musk Donald J. Trump Jeff Bezos

KanekoaTheGreat

1,948,456 views • 1 year ago

Investigative journalist Whitney Webb: BlackRock is attempting to establish complete control over the natural world under the guise of "saving the planet". "BlackRock being able to unlock and take control of as many natural assets as possible... is obviously a way for them to... expand their control over not just people and the existing financial system, but really over the natural world as well." "The goal, as [BlackRock CEO Larry Fink] has stated, is to have all of this on a universal ledger... and have it be trackable and surveillable." "The natural world is vast and huge, and they're financialising it all—framing it as the only way to save the planet, but really it's the only way for them to save their insane debt racket."
2:52

Investigative journalist Whitney Webb: BlackRock is attempting to establish complete control over the natural world under the guise of "saving the planet". "BlackRock being able to unlock and take control of as many natural assets as possible... is obviously a way for them to... expand their control over not just people and the existing financial system, but really over the natural world as well." "The goal, as [BlackRock CEO Larry Fink] has stated, is to have all of this on a universal ledger... and have it be trackable and surveillable." "The natural world is vast and huge, and they're financialising it all—framing it as the only way to save the planet, but really it's the only way for them to save their insane debt racket."

Wide Awake Media

218,711 views • 1 year ago

"The Federal Reserve is neither federal nor does it have reserves. It's actually a cartel of banks that is printing money out of thin air and profiting off debt that we have to pay, collected by taxes at force, which we also pay for. It's actually a pretty horrendous system if you think about it." ~ Aaron Day Full discussion: #EndTheFed
2:09

"The Federal Reserve is neither federal nor does it have reserves. It's actually a cartel of banks that is printing money out of thin air and profiting off debt that we have to pay, collected by taxes at force, which we also pay for. It's actually a pretty horrendous system if you think about it." ~ Aaron Day Full discussion: #EndTheFed

Chris Martenson

19,887 views • 1 year ago

Zelenskyy about the counteroffensive: "It's not a movie, it's hard for me to say how you will see the counteroffensive. The main thing is for Russia to see it, and not only to see it, but to feel it. The liberation of all the occupied regions is the result of the counteroffensive."
0:48

Zelenskyy about the counteroffensive: "It's not a movie, it's hard for me to say how you will see the counteroffensive. The main thing is for Russia to see it, and not only to see it, but to feel it. The liberation of all the occupied regions is the result of the counteroffensive."

NEXTA

301,463 views • 3 years ago

Dave Ramsey tells a 26-year-old millionaire to skip the prenup and pay off his fiancée's $150,000 debt instead "If I were in your shoes, I would get so comfortable with this lady in order to marry her that I don't need a prenup. You don't have enough net worth to fool with it" The debt: "she will be coming out of school with about 120,000 to 150,000 in debt" The solution: "you got 350,000 in a college account, you can use it for your spouse, and I'd pay off that debt in about 20 seconds" The problem with prenups: "it's kind of got one foot in the boat, one on the dock... I want you to go all in. What it does, it keeps people from going deep" The commitment: "the only chance you have in a culture that hates marriage for your marriage to last is you gotta be willing to die for 'em. You gotta be willing to take a bullet for 'em" "If you can't get $600,000 worth of comfortable with somebody, you don't need to marry them"
2:24

Dave Ramsey tells a 26-year-old millionaire to skip the prenup and pay off his fiancée's $150,000 debt instead "If I were in your shoes, I would get so comfortable with this lady in order to marry her that I don't need a prenup. You don't have enough net worth to fool with it" The debt: "she will be coming out of school with about 120,000 to 150,000 in debt" The solution: "you got 350,000 in a college account, you can use it for your spouse, and I'd pay off that debt in about 20 seconds" The problem with prenups: "it's kind of got one foot in the boat, one on the dock... I want you to go all in. What it does, it keeps people from going deep" The commitment: "the only chance you have in a culture that hates marriage for your marriage to last is you gotta be willing to die for 'em. You gotta be willing to take a bullet for 'em" "If you can't get $600,000 worth of comfortable with somebody, you don't need to marry them"

3rdeye👁️🇪🇸

42,763 views • 2 months ago

Canada healthcare is horrifying “Today on how f*cked is Canadian healthcare: I need an MRI to see if I have a f*cking brain tumor. Go ahead guess when it is? Go ahead, guess. It's in 2026” “My MRI to see if I have a brain tumor is in 2026. It's March 2025 right now” “If you thought this was bad, it's actually worse than you thought. Because the appointment where we decided that I need this MRI was in December of last year. So it's not like it's 10 months from now. It's 13 months. It's a 13 month wait to see if I have a brain tumor” “I just thought this was a mistake — But no, I called and the clinic was like, yeah, the doctor actually requested that you have it earlier, but this is the next spot we have. We're seeing about 13 months out” “Canada where healthcare is free, but only if you can afford to wait.”
1:09

Canada healthcare is horrifying “Today on how f*cked is Canadian healthcare: I need an MRI to see if I have a f*cking brain tumor. Go ahead guess when it is? Go ahead, guess. It's in 2026” “My MRI to see if I have a brain tumor is in 2026. It's March 2025 right now” “If you thought this was bad, it's actually worse than you thought. Because the appointment where we decided that I need this MRI was in December of last year. So it's not like it's 10 months from now. It's 13 months. It's a 13 month wait to see if I have a brain tumor” “I just thought this was a mistake — But no, I called and the clinic was like, yeah, the doctor actually requested that you have it earlier, but this is the next spot we have. We're seeing about 13 months out” “Canada where healthcare is free, but only if you can afford to wait.”

Wall Street Apes

8,269,366 views • 1 year ago

J-Cal: Build something of value, don't go $200K into debt for college! "Everybody talking about how poor people as a group can never, ever strive and never build anything, the truth is it's the easiest it's ever been to build a company, to build a project, and to be independent as a creator of a product or service in the world." "It's the easiest it's ever been. It requires the least capital and the least amount of time." "So we're selling a narrative to people that they're helpless, when in fact they are super, super empowered." "The only thing you can't do is put yourself into $200,000 in debt, because you'll never get out of it."
0:34

J-Cal: Build something of value, don't go $200K into debt for college! "Everybody talking about how poor people as a group can never, ever strive and never build anything, the truth is it's the easiest it's ever been to build a company, to build a project, and to be independent as a creator of a product or service in the world." "It's the easiest it's ever been. It requires the least capital and the least amount of time." "So we're selling a narrative to people that they're helpless, when in fact they are super, super empowered." "The only thing you can't do is put yourself into $200,000 in debt, because you'll never get out of it."

The All-In Podcast

77,198 views • 1 year ago

So the discourse around this Dave Ramsey clip is so mixed up that I’ve just decided to upload the whole thing. In the full context of the call, the caller makes it perfectly obvious that: 1. She has been with this man, whom she is now living with, for six years. 2. She is a nurse and can make her own money. 3. She has been out of school for two years, and in that time she has paid off $70,000 of the debt. In the course of the call, Dave never suggests that this man should have to pay for that debt. Indeed, he actively suggests that she leave him, which guarantees he will not pay for the debt. Dave also all but says that, because of her career choice, the caller will be able to pay for the debt on her own, even if she has to take extra hours. All Dave is saying—and this should have been obvious from the original clip—is that the two are not aligned on money and debt at all. It is also clear that Dave thinks the man is stringing her along, which he is. So they simply should not be married at all, because this is a fundamental failure in the relationship. I myself would add that, at this late stage in the relationship, if you do not trust a woman financially, you should simply not be with that woman. And that is perfectly fine. But what you do not do is drag her along for six years when she obviously wants to get married, and then put another two or three years of financial hoops in front of her so that maybe you will propose. It is a waste of everybody’s time.
6:16

So the discourse around this Dave Ramsey clip is so mixed up that I’ve just decided to upload the whole thing. In the full context of the call, the caller makes it perfectly obvious that: 1. She has been with this man, whom she is now living with, for six years. 2. She is a nurse and can make her own money. 3. She has been out of school for two years, and in that time she has paid off $70,000 of the debt. In the course of the call, Dave never suggests that this man should have to pay for that debt. Indeed, he actively suggests that she leave him, which guarantees he will not pay for the debt. Dave also all but says that, because of her career choice, the caller will be able to pay for the debt on her own, even if she has to take extra hours. All Dave is saying—and this should have been obvious from the original clip—is that the two are not aligned on money and debt at all. It is also clear that Dave thinks the man is stringing her along, which he is. So they simply should not be married at all, because this is a fundamental failure in the relationship. I myself would add that, at this late stage in the relationship, if you do not trust a woman financially, you should simply not be with that woman. And that is perfectly fine. But what you do not do is drag her along for six years when she obviously wants to get married, and then put another two or three years of financial hoops in front of her so that maybe you will propose. It is a waste of everybody’s time.

CTrefugees

135,314 views • 2 months ago

The latest from Marco Rubio on the negotiations: “It's the reason why we're involved in this whole Ukraine-Russia conflict. That's not our war, it's not the president's war. This war started... It never would have happened if you'd been president. But this war is going on and the president is trying to end it, not because... Listen, we got a million things to focus on in the world as a country. But he's the only leader in the world that can help end it, and that's why we're... Tha- that's why even as we speak to you now, uh, Steve Witkof is in Moscow trying to find a way to end this war to save lives of eight, nine thousand people, Mr. President, as you want to know are dying every week. More people are dying a week in that war than have died in the entirety of the US's involvement in Afghanistan or Iraq. Just think about that, how bloody and destructive it is”.
0:38

The latest from Marco Rubio on the negotiations: “It's the reason why we're involved in this whole Ukraine-Russia conflict. That's not our war, it's not the president's war. This war started... It never would have happened if you'd been president. But this war is going on and the president is trying to end it, not because... Listen, we got a million things to focus on in the world as a country. But he's the only leader in the world that can help end it, and that's why we're... Tha- that's why even as we speak to you now, uh, Steve Witkof is in Moscow trying to find a way to end this war to save lives of eight, nine thousand people, Mr. President, as you want to know are dying every week. More people are dying a week in that war than have died in the entirety of the US's involvement in Afghanistan or Iraq. Just think about that, how bloody and destructive it is”.

Kateryna Lisunova

126,074 views • 8 months ago