正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

The message from China is simple: Enter once, get expelled once. Bringing CNN aboard does not turn an intrusion into legality. It only proves the provocation was staged for cameras. And dragging Trump into it changes nothing. Huangyan Dao is Chinese territory. Philippine vessels intruded. China removed them. Manila... show more

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

56,308 subscribers

16,106 次观看 • 24 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Huangyan Dao is #China’s territory. #philippine official vessels’ intrusion into the waters of the island seriously violated China’s sovereignty, rights and interests and jeopardized peace and stability at sea. China took lawful measures to defend its territorial sovereignty and…#Philippines needs to stop these activities at once and must not challenge China’s firm resolve to safeguard our lawful rights and interests.

Huangyan Dao is #China’s territory. #philippine official vessels’ intrusion into the waters of the island seriously violated China’s sovereignty, rights and interests and jeopardized peace and stability at sea. China took lawful measures to defend its territorial sovereignty and…#Philippines needs to stop these activities at once and must not challenge China’s firm resolve to safeguard our lawful rights and interests.

Chinese Embassy in US

57,331 次观看 • 11 个月前

Manila is not a “victim.” It is auditioning to become Asia’s Israel: small-state hysteria, Western sponsorship, constant provocation, permanent victim theater, and zero regard for the civilians it uses as props. The Philippines knows China will not behave like the United States. China will not bomb fishing boats and order “kill them all.” So Manila keeps pushing poor fishermen and small boats into confrontations, betting Filipino lives on Chinese restraint. The Marcos administration is not protecting the Philippines. It is renting the country out as a forward operating stage for America’s Asia-Pacific containment script. Japan claps because it wants Asia unstable. America claps because it wants another powder keg. That is why China is angry. Not because Manila is “small.” But because Manila is trying to import Middle East-style chaos into Asia. Asia does not need another powder keg. And China will not let the South China Sea become one.

Manila is not a “victim.” It is auditioning to become Asia’s Israel: small-state hysteria, Western sponsorship, constant provocation, permanent victim theater, and zero regard for the civilians it uses as props. The Philippines knows China will not behave like the United States. China will not bomb fishing boats and order “kill them all.” So Manila keeps pushing poor fishermen and small boats into confrontations, betting Filipino lives on Chinese restraint. The Marcos administration is not protecting the Philippines. It is renting the country out as a forward operating stage for America’s Asia-Pacific containment script. Japan claps because it wants Asia unstable. America claps because it wants another powder keg. That is why China is angry. Not because Manila is “small.” But because Manila is trying to import Middle East-style chaos into Asia. Asia does not need another powder keg. And China will not let the South China Sea become one.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

18,355 次观看 • 1 个月前

“Your country is different from mine!” Panama's foreign minister shouted at China at OAS summit. This is the funniest part of Panama's whining: it violated commercial trust, tore up a 30-year port concession, targeted a Chinese-linked company, then hid the whole dirty performance under “sovereignty,” “constitution,” and “rule of law.” As if only Panama has sovereignty. As if only Panama has constitutional duties. As if China inspecting Panama-flagged vessels involved in repeated incidents in Chinese waters is not also an exercise of sovereignty, law enforcement, and responsibility for maritime safety. Yes, Panama is different from China. China does not turn its sovereignty and constitution into tools for Washington to destroy its own credibility and commercial environment. China’s law protects fair business, lawful cooperation, maritime safety, and good-faith investors. It is not a stage prop for small countries that target Chinese interests under U.S. pressure, then scream “bullying” when China stops playing along. Panama wanted to weaponize law against Chinese investors. China answered with law. That is why Panama is angry. Not because China broke the rules. Because China made Panama live under them.

“Your country is different from mine!” Panama's foreign minister shouted at China at OAS summit. This is the funniest part of Panama's whining: it violated commercial trust, tore up a 30-year port concession, targeted a Chinese-linked company, then hid the whole dirty performance under “sovereignty,” “constitution,” and “rule of law.” As if only Panama has sovereignty. As if only Panama has constitutional duties. As if China inspecting Panama-flagged vessels involved in repeated incidents in Chinese waters is not also an exercise of sovereignty, law enforcement, and responsibility for maritime safety. Yes, Panama is different from China. China does not turn its sovereignty and constitution into tools for Washington to destroy its own credibility and commercial environment. China’s law protects fair business, lawful cooperation, maritime safety, and good-faith investors. It is not a stage prop for small countries that target Chinese interests under U.S. pressure, then scream “bullying” when China stops playing along. Panama wanted to weaponize law against Chinese investors. China answered with law. That is why Panama is angry. Not because China broke the rules. Because China made Panama live under them.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

84,677 次观看 • 1 个月前

For the first time, China’s Defense Ministry has made it clear: Zhongye Dao is China’s sacred and inviolable territory. The Philippines can abandon its fantasy of coveting land that does not belong to it. This entire South China Sea drama is built on one dirty logic: provoke China, hide behind America, cry “small country” when China responds, then sell the performance as sovereignty. But sovereignty is not a pity card. The Philippines grounded that rusting warship on Ren’ai Jiao one day after the U.S. bombed China’s embassy in Belgrade. Chinese blood had not even dried, and Manila moved to seize Chinese territory. That was a blood debt written into the reef. A country that builds its “sovereignty” by stepping over Chinese corpses has no moral ground to cry victim when China comes to collect its own territory back. For decades, Manila has survived by kneeling to whoever arrived with a bigger flag: When Spanish colonists arrived, it knelt before Spain. When American colonists arrived, it knelt before America. When Japanese fascists arrived, it knelt before Japan’s fascists. When Japanese fascists left, it continued kneeling before America. The Philippines may be poor, but it has many masters. Now it wants to play victim while acting as Washington’s rented knife in the South China Sea. China has negotiated enough. China has tolerated enough. China has shown enough restraint to people who read restraint as permission. Zhongye Dao is Chinese territory. Ren’ai Jiao is Chinese territory. Nansha Qundao is Chinese territory. Political shows staged by Philippine officials cannot change history, law, or power. The circus ends. Sovereignty returns to the owner.

For the first time, China’s Defense Ministry has made it clear: Zhongye Dao is China’s sacred and inviolable territory. The Philippines can abandon its fantasy of coveting land that does not belong to it. This entire South China Sea drama is built on one dirty logic: provoke China, hide behind America, cry “small country” when China responds, then sell the performance as sovereignty. But sovereignty is not a pity card. The Philippines grounded that rusting warship on Ren’ai Jiao one day after the U.S. bombed China’s embassy in Belgrade. Chinese blood had not even dried, and Manila moved to seize Chinese territory. That was a blood debt written into the reef. A country that builds its “sovereignty” by stepping over Chinese corpses has no moral ground to cry victim when China comes to collect its own territory back. For decades, Manila has survived by kneeling to whoever arrived with a bigger flag: When Spanish colonists arrived, it knelt before Spain. When American colonists arrived, it knelt before America. When Japanese fascists arrived, it knelt before Japan’s fascists. When Japanese fascists left, it continued kneeling before America. The Philippines may be poor, but it has many masters. Now it wants to play victim while acting as Washington’s rented knife in the South China Sea. China has negotiated enough. China has tolerated enough. China has shown enough restraint to people who read restraint as permission. Zhongye Dao is Chinese territory. Ren’ai Jiao is Chinese territory. Nansha Qundao is Chinese territory. Political shows staged by Philippine officials cannot change history, law, or power. The circus ends. Sovereignty returns to the owner.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

37,361 次观看 • 28 天前

China’s message to the Philippines is very simple: You do not get to gaslight China with a piece of paper China never accepted, never recognized, and will never treat as binding. Call it an “award” if it makes you feel important. Perform for Western cameras. Jump as high as you want. To China, it is illegal, null, void, and non-binding. A fantasy does not become law just because Manila keeps reading it out loud. Jump higher. It is still toilet paper with Western subtitles.

China’s message to the Philippines is very simple: You do not get to gaslight China with a piece of paper China never accepted, never recognized, and will never treat as binding. Call it an “award” if it makes you feel important. Perform for Western cameras. Jump as high as you want. To China, it is illegal, null, void, and non-binding. A fantasy does not become law just because Manila keeps reading it out loud. Jump higher. It is still toilet paper with Western subtitles.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

78,381 次观看 • 1 个月前

What this video really exposes is Japan’s strategic humiliation. Sanae Takaichi can say, “a Taiwan emergency is a Japan emergency,” and posture as if Japan were drawing red lines with China. But the confidence behind that line comes not from Japanese sovereignty, only from domestic populism and the assumption that the United States will remain the ultimate backer. That is Japan’s dilemma. It wants to act tough toward China, while constantly making itself useful and obedient enough not to be discarded by Washington. And that is exactly why Trump-style America is so dangerous for Tokyo. Trump does not respect loyalty; he's obsessed with power. The more Japan flatters, the less equal it becomes. Because Trump discards imperial pets faster than enemies — he only respects those who have the ability to say “no.” This is why postwar Japan remains trapped between performance and dependence: outwardly feigned strategic autonomy while outsourcing its security identity to its master. And unlike Europe, Japan faces a deeper problem in China: it is not dealing only with rivalry, but with an unresolved civilizational wound. China does not hate Japan merely because Japan is pro-American. China hates Japan because Japan invaded, massacred, and brutalized it on a historic scale. What makes Japan even less respected is that it shows arrogance toward the people it once slaughtered and still tries to project itself as a moral actor in Asia, while showing extraordinary obedience toward the power that bombed Tokyo and atomized Hiroshima and Nagasaki. For the Chinese, that is what makes Japan uniquely contemptible: arrogant toward its victims, submissive toward its master, and still pretending to stand upright.

What this video really exposes is Japan’s strategic humiliation. Sanae Takaichi can say, “a Taiwan emergency is a Japan emergency,” and posture as if Japan were drawing red lines with China. But the confidence behind that line comes not from Japanese sovereignty, only from domestic populism and the assumption that the United States will remain the ultimate backer. That is Japan’s dilemma. It wants to act tough toward China, while constantly making itself useful and obedient enough not to be discarded by Washington. And that is exactly why Trump-style America is so dangerous for Tokyo. Trump does not respect loyalty; he's obsessed with power. The more Japan flatters, the less equal it becomes. Because Trump discards imperial pets faster than enemies — he only respects those who have the ability to say “no.” This is why postwar Japan remains trapped between performance and dependence: outwardly feigned strategic autonomy while outsourcing its security identity to its master. And unlike Europe, Japan faces a deeper problem in China: it is not dealing only with rivalry, but with an unresolved civilizational wound. China does not hate Japan merely because Japan is pro-American. China hates Japan because Japan invaded, massacred, and brutalized it on a historic scale. What makes Japan even less respected is that it shows arrogance toward the people it once slaughtered and still tries to project itself as a moral actor in Asia, while showing extraordinary obedience toward the power that bombed Tokyo and atomized Hiroshima and Nagasaki. For the Chinese, that is what makes Japan uniquely contemptible: arrogant toward its victims, submissive toward its master, and still pretending to stand upright.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

45,863 次观看 • 5 个月前

Bessent just admitted the quiet part: everyone else is afraid of U.S. sanctions, but China kept buying Iranian oil. That is what real support looks like. Not hashtags. Not empty “rules-based order” sermons. Not performative outrage from anti-China colonial pets. When Trump bombed Iran, blocked Hormuz, and tried to choke Tehran economically, they laughed and said China had lost its cheap oil. Then they mocked China for “not helping Iran.” But helping a country does not always mean sending troops. Sometimes it means keeping its economy breathing when Washington tries to suffocate it. China’s demand, industry, and payment networks gave Iran enough room to survive the pressure until America could no longer drag out a war it could not afford. And then Washington had to sign a ceasefire so humiliating that even MAGA called it surrender. China did not need to fire a missile. It bought oil. It kept trade alive. That is why sanctions did not become a death sentence. That is why empire hates China: because China does not ask permission to keep another country standing.

Bessent just admitted the quiet part: everyone else is afraid of U.S. sanctions, but China kept buying Iranian oil. That is what real support looks like. Not hashtags. Not empty “rules-based order” sermons. Not performative outrage from anti-China colonial pets. When Trump bombed Iran, blocked Hormuz, and tried to choke Tehran economically, they laughed and said China had lost its cheap oil. Then they mocked China for “not helping Iran.” But helping a country does not always mean sending troops. Sometimes it means keeping its economy breathing when Washington tries to suffocate it. China’s demand, industry, and payment networks gave Iran enough room to survive the pressure until America could no longer drag out a war it could not afford. And then Washington had to sign a ceasefire so humiliating that even MAGA called it surrender. China did not need to fire a missile. It bought oil. It kept trade alive. That is why sanctions did not become a death sentence. That is why empire hates China: because China does not ask permission to keep another country standing.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

11,546 次观看 • 1 个月前

China did not even bother to dignify Panama’s accusations. It dismissed them with disdain. Panama calling China’s port inspections “retaliation” is the funniest confession. Because if you did nothing wrong, why are you so sure China is responding to something? Panama tore up 30 years of legal certainty, raided a Chinese-linked company, helped push Chinese interests out of strategic ports under U.S. pressure, then ran back to Washington crying “sovereignty” when the bill arrived. A cheap client-state melodrama. China does not bully small countries. China works with Africa, Latin America, and the Global South every day. Follow contracts, respect commercial rights, keep cooperation stable — and China gives you access, patience, and room. But Panama chose another path. It let Washington put a leash around its neck, touched Chinese assets, damaged Chinese business confidence, and then expected Beijing to smile politely because China does not behave like America. No bombs. No coups. No Marines landing at dawn. No kidnapped presidents. Just inspections. Rules. Delays. Paperwork. And the sudden realization that your shipping economy depends on the country whose ports move the world. Seven of the world’s top ten most efficient ports are in China. China is the world’s largest shipbuilding power. China is a maritime giant. So no, China does not need aircraft carriers to make Panama feel pain. Sometimes power is not a missile. Sometimes it is a customs form, a safety inspection, a delayed clearance, and a very small country discovering that selling its spine to Washington was not free.

China did not even bother to dignify Panama’s accusations. It dismissed them with disdain. Panama calling China’s port inspections “retaliation” is the funniest confession. Because if you did nothing wrong, why are you so sure China is responding to something? Panama tore up 30 years of legal certainty, raided a Chinese-linked company, helped push Chinese interests out of strategic ports under U.S. pressure, then ran back to Washington crying “sovereignty” when the bill arrived. A cheap client-state melodrama. China does not bully small countries. China works with Africa, Latin America, and the Global South every day. Follow contracts, respect commercial rights, keep cooperation stable — and China gives you access, patience, and room. But Panama chose another path. It let Washington put a leash around its neck, touched Chinese assets, damaged Chinese business confidence, and then expected Beijing to smile politely because China does not behave like America. No bombs. No coups. No Marines landing at dawn. No kidnapped presidents. Just inspections. Rules. Delays. Paperwork. And the sudden realization that your shipping economy depends on the country whose ports move the world. Seven of the world’s top ten most efficient ports are in China. China is the world’s largest shipbuilding power. China is a maritime giant. So no, China does not need aircraft carriers to make Panama feel pain. Sometimes power is not a missile. Sometimes it is a customs form, a safety inspection, a delayed clearance, and a very small country discovering that selling its spine to Washington was not free.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

119,613 次观看 • 1 个月前

SEN. SHAHEEN: What we are hearing from our sources is the President does not want to notice the arms sale to Taiwan before he goes to China. Well, what better time to notice it? Because that sends a very strong message that China should keep its mitts off Taiwan.

SEN. SHAHEEN: What we are hearing from our sources is the President does not want to notice the arms sale to Taiwan before he goes to China. Well, what better time to notice it? Because that sends a very strong message that China should keep its mitts off Taiwan.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee

11,416 次观看 • 3 个月前

Jensen Huang says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei Nvidia was not rejected because China “hates” Nvidia. It was pushed out because Washington turned chips into a leash. China learned the lesson very clearly: You cannot build AI sovereignty on hardware that your geopolitical rival can revoke with one export-control memo. Jensen Huang can be friendly. Nvidia can be excellent. Chinese demand can be huge. None of that changes the strategic reality. If the neck of China’s AI industry depends on an American-controlled chip supply, then it is not an industry. It is a hostage. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do: It built alternatives. It endured the pain. It let Huawei grow into the space Washington forced open. Now Nvidia says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei. That is not China closing a door. That is America sawing off the bridge, then acting surprised when China built its own road.

Jensen Huang says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei Nvidia was not rejected because China “hates” Nvidia. It was pushed out because Washington turned chips into a leash. China learned the lesson very clearly: You cannot build AI sovereignty on hardware that your geopolitical rival can revoke with one export-control memo. Jensen Huang can be friendly. Nvidia can be excellent. Chinese demand can be huge. None of that changes the strategic reality. If the neck of China’s AI industry depends on an American-controlled chip supply, then it is not an industry. It is a hostage. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do: It built alternatives. It endured the pain. It let Huawei grow into the space Washington forced open. Now Nvidia says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei. That is not China closing a door. That is America sawing off the bridge, then acting surprised when China built its own road.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

235,419 次观看 • 2 个月前

Japan and the Philippines can hold all the “maritime delimitation talks” they want. China has already made it clear: the area is east of China’s Taiwan island, and any so-called delimitation that violates China’s maritime rights is illegal, null, and void. A joint statement between two U.S. client states does not erase Chinese sovereignty. It does not create maritime power. It does not rewrite geography. It does not make China disappear. Geopolitics is not cosplay. If you do not have the legal standing, the military power, or the strategic weight to touch China’s waters, then your little map-drawing ceremony is just self-deception with microphones.

Japan and the Philippines can hold all the “maritime delimitation talks” they want. China has already made it clear: the area is east of China’s Taiwan island, and any so-called delimitation that violates China’s maritime rights is illegal, null, and void. A joint statement between two U.S. client states does not erase Chinese sovereignty. It does not create maritime power. It does not rewrite geography. It does not make China disappear. Geopolitics is not cosplay. If you do not have the legal standing, the military power, or the strategic weight to touch China’s waters, then your little map-drawing ceremony is just self-deception with microphones.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

41,786 次观看 • 2 个月前

China is sending a clear message to the Philippines: stop pushing your luck. China’s Defense Ministry says Huangyan Dao is an inherent part of China’s territory and that Beijing has continuously exercised sovereignty and jurisdiction over the area. After the Philippines submitted what it called an official chart covering Huangyan Dao and its surrounding waters to the UN, the PLA Southern Theater Command conducted joint naval and air exercises around the island, while the China Coast Guard carried out law-enforcement drills nearby. Beijing says these exercises are a serious warning in response to what it calls Philippine provocations and violations of China’s sovereignty. The message is blunt: China will not accept what it sees as provocations in the South China Sea, and the PLA says it will respond firmly to any attempt to create trouble.

China is sending a clear message to the Philippines: stop pushing your luck. China’s Defense Ministry says Huangyan Dao is an inherent part of China’s territory and that Beijing has continuously exercised sovereignty and jurisdiction over the area. After the Philippines submitted what it called an official chart covering Huangyan Dao and its surrounding waters to the UN, the PLA Southern Theater Command conducted joint naval and air exercises around the island, while the China Coast Guard carried out law-enforcement drills nearby. Beijing says these exercises are a serious warning in response to what it calls Philippine provocations and violations of China’s sovereignty. The message is blunt: China will not accept what it sees as provocations in the South China Sea, and the PLA says it will respond firmly to any attempt to create trouble.

China pulse 🇨🇳

16,323 次观看 • 10 天前

China is not what you think it is. China was created by America. In 1971 Nixon removed the dollar from the gold standard. The dollar was now worth nothing. So he needed to create demand for it. Two new hallucinations. The petrodollar — oil only sold in US dollars. And China — the world's factory, paid in US dollars. China didn't rise because of communism. China didn't rise because of hard work. China rose because America needed somewhere to park its dollars. China is a hallucination of a hallucination. And here is the problem with that. If the original hallucination becomes unstable — China becomes twice as unstable. Because it has nothing real to stand on. That is why China and America will always need each other. The dream only works if both keep dreaming it.

China is not what you think it is. China was created by America. In 1971 Nixon removed the dollar from the gold standard. The dollar was now worth nothing. So he needed to create demand for it. Two new hallucinations. The petrodollar — oil only sold in US dollars. And China — the world's factory, paid in US dollars. China didn't rise because of communism. China didn't rise because of hard work. China rose because America needed somewhere to park its dollars. China is a hallucination of a hallucination. And here is the problem with that. If the original hallucination becomes unstable — China becomes twice as unstable. Because it has nothing real to stand on. That is why China and America will always need each other. The dream only works if both keep dreaming it.

Predictive History

24,046 次观看 • 3 个月前

Mearsheimer is honest about power. He dares to say the quiet part of Western politics out loud: international relations are not a fairy tale of “good guys” and “bad guys”, but a naked struggle for survival, security, and dominance. That is why, to him, there is no moral distinction between America and China. But he still misunderstands China. His offensive realism has one fixed Western code: • A great power must seek regional hegemony. • A great power must push others into dependence. • A great power must turn its neighborhood into a Monroe Doctrine. So when he sees China rise, he assumes China must want to become America in Asia. That is where he gets China wrong. America’s strategy is exclusion. It cannot tolerate another strong power in its own hemisphere. That is why Cuba, Venezuela, and any independent force in Latin America become permanent targets. China’s strategy is not a Chinese Monroe Doctrine. China’s priority is stability around itself, because China’s own development requires peace, trade, logistics, markets, energy routes, and regional order. But stability does not mean turning neighbors into colonies. It does not mean hundreds of military bases. It does not mean color revolutions, proxy wars, sanctions, coups, and permanent ideological containment. China spent forty years building roads, ports, factories, power grids, railways, supply chains, and markets. America exported war. China exported infrastructure. America’s model is control. China’s model is connectivity. That is why Western realists often misread China. They assume interest maximization must mean domination. They assume security must mean exclusion. They assume strength must become hegemony. But China’s civilizational instinct is different. China does not need every country to become Chinese. It does not need every neighbor to become a satellite. It does not need to export ideology, stage revolutions, or install puppet regimes. China’s highest security is not ruling everyone around it. It is building a region where trade, development, and interdependence make war too expensive and chaos too stupid. Mearsheimer is right that great powers compete. But he is wrong to assume every great power dreams in American grammar. China does not want to become America in Asia. China wants Asia to stop being America’s battlefield.

Mearsheimer is honest about power. He dares to say the quiet part of Western politics out loud: international relations are not a fairy tale of “good guys” and “bad guys”, but a naked struggle for survival, security, and dominance. That is why, to him, there is no moral distinction between America and China. But he still misunderstands China. His offensive realism has one fixed Western code: • A great power must seek regional hegemony. • A great power must push others into dependence. • A great power must turn its neighborhood into a Monroe Doctrine. So when he sees China rise, he assumes China must want to become America in Asia. That is where he gets China wrong. America’s strategy is exclusion. It cannot tolerate another strong power in its own hemisphere. That is why Cuba, Venezuela, and any independent force in Latin America become permanent targets. China’s strategy is not a Chinese Monroe Doctrine. China’s priority is stability around itself, because China’s own development requires peace, trade, logistics, markets, energy routes, and regional order. But stability does not mean turning neighbors into colonies. It does not mean hundreds of military bases. It does not mean color revolutions, proxy wars, sanctions, coups, and permanent ideological containment. China spent forty years building roads, ports, factories, power grids, railways, supply chains, and markets. America exported war. China exported infrastructure. America’s model is control. China’s model is connectivity. That is why Western realists often misread China. They assume interest maximization must mean domination. They assume security must mean exclusion. They assume strength must become hegemony. But China’s civilizational instinct is different. China does not need every country to become Chinese. It does not need every neighbor to become a satellite. It does not need to export ideology, stage revolutions, or install puppet regimes. China’s highest security is not ruling everyone around it. It is building a region where trade, development, and interdependence make war too expensive and chaos too stupid. Mearsheimer is right that great powers compete. But he is wrong to assume every great power dreams in American grammar. China does not want to become America in Asia. China wants Asia to stop being America’s battlefield.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

14,030 次观看 • 1 个月前

GOOGLE JUST CALLED IT WHAT IT IS: THE WEST PHILIPPINE SEA | The world’s maps are evolving — because truth always finds its way. Google now labels it what it legally is — the West Philippine Sea, the maritime Heart of our sovereignty, within the South China Sea. As more than 14,000 troops from the Philippines and allied nations join forces in Balikatan 2025, China lashes out — not because of threat, but because of truth. The Philippines is not a pawn. It is a sovereign nation defending its lawful rights under international law. We are not divided. We are not alone. And we are not afraid. Watch, share, and remind the world: Maps change. Alliances strengthen. But the sea has always been ours.

GOOGLE JUST CALLED IT WHAT IT IS: THE WEST PHILIPPINE SEA | The world’s maps are evolving — because truth always finds its way. Google now labels it what it legally is — the West Philippine Sea, the maritime Heart of our sovereignty, within the South China Sea. As more than 14,000 troops from the Philippines and allied nations join forces in Balikatan 2025, China lashes out — not because of threat, but because of truth. The Philippines is not a pawn. It is a sovereign nation defending its lawful rights under international law. We are not divided. We are not alone. And we are not afraid. Watch, share, and remind the world: Maps change. Alliances strengthen. But the sea has always been ours.

BRP Sierra Madre

10,508 次观看 • 1 年前

To all anti-China Chinese, the US wants all Chinese to be poor, and that includes you. This is not a brutalist philosophy, but a loser's philosophy. The America does not accept peer competitors, and even if China adopts the Constitution and laws of the US, the US will find ways to limit the growth of China to the point where it falls back into poverty.

To all anti-China Chinese, the US wants all Chinese to be poor, and that includes you. This is not a brutalist philosophy, but a loser's philosophy. The America does not accept peer competitors, and even if China adopts the Constitution and laws of the US, the US will find ways to limit the growth of China to the point where it falls back into poverty.

小A来摘🍑

100,231 次观看 • 2 年前

China’s warning about Japan’s re-militarization is not just a warning to Tokyo. It is a warning to the entire region. Japan’s economy has fallen back to roughly its 1992 level in nominal dollar terms, while China has grown into the world’s second-largest economy. China’s military spending has long remained below 1.5% of GDP. Even if Japan pushes defense spending to 5% of its GDP, it still cannot match China’s scale, industrial capacity, military R&D, shipbuilding, missile production, or strategic depth. So let us be honest: Japan’s re-militarization is not a real military threat to China. Japan cannot fight China. The real danger is to the smaller countries that keep telling China to “move on” from history. Japan once invaded, occupied, burned, raped, enslaved, and massacred across Asia. China. Korea. The Philippines. Indonesia. Singapore. Malaysia. Vietnam. Myanmar. Cambodia. Laos. Half of Asia remembers what Imperial Japan did. Or at least it should. The reason Japan has behaved like a “peaceful country” after 1945 is not because Japanese militarism suddenly grew a conscience. It is because the postwar order pulled out the beast’s fangs. And because China became too strong to be swallowed again. Now, as the U.S.-led order weakens, Japan’s Neo-fascist forces are testing the cage. They call it “defense.” They call it “counterstrike capability.” They call it “normalization.” But Asia has heard these words before. Japan has always known how to dress aggression in polite language. Today Japan does not dare confront China directly. So it provokes China, hides behind Washington, cries about Chinese “bullying,” and performs weakness for the Western press. That theater creates a useful illusion: Japan is peaceful. China is aggressive. But the real historical danger is not that Japan will defeat China. It is that Japan will once again turn its militarism toward countries that cannot fight back. And here is the part those countries should understand: China will not sacrifice Chinese soldiers to protect client states that choose the “Indo-Pacific” containment camp and help Tokyo and Washington pressure China. The Chinese people would not allow it. If some countries believe they can cut themselves off from China, stand with Japan, erase history, and become “higher-class Asians” under the U.S. umbrella, then they should prepare to live with the consequences. Japan was restrained by defeat. Not by remorse. And when the leash loosens, the first victims are rarely the strong.

China’s warning about Japan’s re-militarization is not just a warning to Tokyo. It is a warning to the entire region. Japan’s economy has fallen back to roughly its 1992 level in nominal dollar terms, while China has grown into the world’s second-largest economy. China’s military spending has long remained below 1.5% of GDP. Even if Japan pushes defense spending to 5% of its GDP, it still cannot match China’s scale, industrial capacity, military R&D, shipbuilding, missile production, or strategic depth. So let us be honest: Japan’s re-militarization is not a real military threat to China. Japan cannot fight China. The real danger is to the smaller countries that keep telling China to “move on” from history. Japan once invaded, occupied, burned, raped, enslaved, and massacred across Asia. China. Korea. The Philippines. Indonesia. Singapore. Malaysia. Vietnam. Myanmar. Cambodia. Laos. Half of Asia remembers what Imperial Japan did. Or at least it should. The reason Japan has behaved like a “peaceful country” after 1945 is not because Japanese militarism suddenly grew a conscience. It is because the postwar order pulled out the beast’s fangs. And because China became too strong to be swallowed again. Now, as the U.S.-led order weakens, Japan’s Neo-fascist forces are testing the cage. They call it “defense.” They call it “counterstrike capability.” They call it “normalization.” But Asia has heard these words before. Japan has always known how to dress aggression in polite language. Today Japan does not dare confront China directly. So it provokes China, hides behind Washington, cries about Chinese “bullying,” and performs weakness for the Western press. That theater creates a useful illusion: Japan is peaceful. China is aggressive. But the real historical danger is not that Japan will defeat China. It is that Japan will once again turn its militarism toward countries that cannot fight back. And here is the part those countries should understand: China will not sacrifice Chinese soldiers to protect client states that choose the “Indo-Pacific” containment camp and help Tokyo and Washington pressure China. The Chinese people would not allow it. If some countries believe they can cut themselves off from China, stand with Japan, erase history, and become “higher-class Asians” under the U.S. umbrella, then they should prepare to live with the consequences. Japan was restrained by defeat. Not by remorse. And when the leash loosens, the first victims are rarely the strong.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

29,354 次观看 • 2 个月前

Israel’s ambassador asks China what it signed, what it paid, what “special privilege” lets its ships pass safely. Maybe the answer is simpler: China, too, carries a civilizational memory of near-destruction. But it does not treat historical trauma as a license to massacre civilians. It does not turn national suffering into a permanent moral exemption for slaughter. If 9/11 was called terrorism, then what do we call destruction inflicted on civilians on a scale a tens of thousand times greater? Some nations remember pain and become more restrained. Others turn “Never Again” into “Once Again.”

Israel’s ambassador asks China what it signed, what it paid, what “special privilege” lets its ships pass safely. Maybe the answer is simpler: China, too, carries a civilizational memory of near-destruction. But it does not treat historical trauma as a license to massacre civilians. It does not turn national suffering into a permanent moral exemption for slaughter. If 9/11 was called terrorism, then what do we call destruction inflicted on civilians on a scale a tens of thousand times greater? Some nations remember pain and become more restrained. Others turn “Never Again” into “Once Again.”

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

14,540 次观看 • 4 个月前

China’s Southern Theater Command did not just say it “warned” and “tracked” the Dutch frigate. It used a much rarer phrase: “warning electronic interference.” Translation: We are no longer just shouting through a loudspeaker. We are touching your systems. The Dutch frigate De Ruyter and its shipborne helicopter did not simply “pass through.” It illegally entered waters near the Xisha Islands, while its helicopter repeatedly intruded into Chinese territorial airspace. And China responded with electronic pressure. Radar. Communications. Sensors. Data links. This is where modern naval confrontation begins. Not with a missile. Not with a cannon shot. But with the loss of electromagnetic control. Europe’s little naval cosplay in the South China Sea is becoming increasingly pathetic. The Netherlands thought it was showing presence. Instead, it received a lesson: The South China Sea is not a stage for declining colonial powers to perform relevance. China sees you. China tracks you. And now China is openly telling you it can interfere with you. Not wanting war does not mean China is afraid of war. It means China is giving you one last chance to leave before your expensive toys become useless metal.

China’s Southern Theater Command did not just say it “warned” and “tracked” the Dutch frigate. It used a much rarer phrase: “warning electronic interference.” Translation: We are no longer just shouting through a loudspeaker. We are touching your systems. The Dutch frigate De Ruyter and its shipborne helicopter did not simply “pass through.” It illegally entered waters near the Xisha Islands, while its helicopter repeatedly intruded into Chinese territorial airspace. And China responded with electronic pressure. Radar. Communications. Sensors. Data links. This is where modern naval confrontation begins. Not with a missile. Not with a cannon shot. But with the loss of electromagnetic control. Europe’s little naval cosplay in the South China Sea is becoming increasingly pathetic. The Netherlands thought it was showing presence. Instead, it received a lesson: The South China Sea is not a stage for declining colonial powers to perform relevance. China sees you. China tracks you. And now China is openly telling you it can interfere with you. Not wanting war does not mean China is afraid of war. It means China is giving you one last chance to leave before your expensive toys become useless metal.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

33,105 次观看 • 2 个月前

Rubio’s entire statement can be translated into one paragraph: America preached free markets when it was winning. Now that China is succeeding under the rules Washington claimed to worship, competition becomes “Chinese aggression,” industrial policy becomes “cheating,” and American decline becomes someone else’s crime. China never showed much interest in becoming the world’s policeman. It would much rather let the United States stand in front, absorb the anger, finance the wars, patrol the oceans, and exhaust itself—while China develops, trades, builds, and moves forward. Washington’s real problem is not that China wants to replace it. It is that America cannot tolerate any country becoming strong enough to ignore its permission. The Soviet Union. Germany. Japan. The European Union. Whenever another power rises, American paranoia activates. It does not compete. It sanctions. Blocks. Threatens. Cuts access. Weaponizes finance. Then calls the damage “defending the rules-based order.” But China is the opponent Washington was never psychologically prepared for. The more it is contained, the more it substitutes. The more it is sanctioned, the more it builds. The more it is denied, the more it learns to live without America. The United States has no memory of rebuilding from national ruin. China does. That is why Washington experiences setbacks as humiliation, while China experiences them as instructions. And Rubio’s Taiwan remarks expose the fraud behind Washington’s language of “stability.” The United States says it opposes any change to the status quo—not because the status quo is sacred, but because permanent division serves American power. China is expected to tolerate separatism, foreign arms, political interference, and an island turned into a strategic pressure point indefinitely. Washington calls that “peace.” But any attempt by China to end the arrangement becomes “coercion.” So Rubio’s message is simple: We lost the free-market competition we claimed to believe in. China kept advancing despite our attempts to stop it. Direct confrontation is becoming too dangerous. But we still intend to preserve every geopolitical advantage created by Chinese division. America is not asking for stability because it has accepted China. It is asking for a strategic pause while keeping Taiwan frozen as leverage. Containment failed. The appetite for containment did not.

Rubio’s entire statement can be translated into one paragraph: America preached free markets when it was winning. Now that China is succeeding under the rules Washington claimed to worship, competition becomes “Chinese aggression,” industrial policy becomes “cheating,” and American decline becomes someone else’s crime. China never showed much interest in becoming the world’s policeman. It would much rather let the United States stand in front, absorb the anger, finance the wars, patrol the oceans, and exhaust itself—while China develops, trades, builds, and moves forward. Washington’s real problem is not that China wants to replace it. It is that America cannot tolerate any country becoming strong enough to ignore its permission. The Soviet Union. Germany. Japan. The European Union. Whenever another power rises, American paranoia activates. It does not compete. It sanctions. Blocks. Threatens. Cuts access. Weaponizes finance. Then calls the damage “defending the rules-based order.” But China is the opponent Washington was never psychologically prepared for. The more it is contained, the more it substitutes. The more it is sanctioned, the more it builds. The more it is denied, the more it learns to live without America. The United States has no memory of rebuilding from national ruin. China does. That is why Washington experiences setbacks as humiliation, while China experiences them as instructions. And Rubio’s Taiwan remarks expose the fraud behind Washington’s language of “stability.” The United States says it opposes any change to the status quo—not because the status quo is sacred, but because permanent division serves American power. China is expected to tolerate separatism, foreign arms, political interference, and an island turned into a strategic pressure point indefinitely. Washington calls that “peace.” But any attempt by China to end the arrangement becomes “coercion.” So Rubio’s message is simple: We lost the free-market competition we claimed to believe in. China kept advancing despite our attempts to stop it. Direct confrontation is becoming too dangerous. But we still intend to preserve every geopolitical advantage created by Chinese division. America is not asking for stability because it has accepted China. It is asking for a strategic pause while keeping Taiwan frozen as leverage. Containment failed. The appetite for containment did not.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

36,226 次观看 • 14 天前