Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The most brutal part is not that China is using AI to sort garbage. It is that China has pushed waste management so far that the old problem has reversed. China used to worry about having too much garbage to process. Now some waste-to-energy plants are facing the opposite...

459,480 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 38

Фото профиля Space Cadet
Space Cadet3 месяцев назад

This is the future I have imagined about a decade ago, but I was thinking the United States would do it. I'm glad to see China figuring it out.

Фото профиля Polly St. George
Polly St. George3 месяцев назад

they make fake food out of it, even! And people eat it! what a great country.

Фото профиля 𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦3 месяцев назад

Your country even funds euthanasia for the poor, and Congress openly pays homage to the Nazis; your jealousy is truly disgusting.

Фото профиля Muffa Connection Caporale Scelto
Muffa Connection Caporale Scelto3 месяцев назад

@FringeViews Thing is that some countries just DIRECTLY PRODUCE JUNK FOOD not as a mean to recycling, just directly producing actual garbage to be eaten. There's some kinda difference, imho... 🤷‍♂️

Фото профиля 𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦3 месяцев назад

@FringeViews No garbage is more rotten and foul than the brain of a colonial lackey.

Фото профиля Muffa Connection Caporale Scelto
Muffa Connection Caporale Scelto3 месяцев назад

@FringeViews It's litterally insane to think that #US food is somehow sane..... I agree with walls on the #US borders, if they're meant not to make mess abroad with all of that garbage, and force them in... 🤷‍♂️

Фото профиля 𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦3 месяцев назад

@FringeViews Then we agree on one thing: the real garbage export is not China turning waste into energy. It is America turning industrial junk food, moral rot, and imperial mess into a global product.

Фото профиля Scott McGrath
Scott McGrath3 месяцев назад

It’s because in the US its frequently more profitable to game the system for profits vs producing goods and services, China has a very simple flat tax system. so in china one is incentivized to make money, in the US play tax games.

Фото профиля Jim Heath
Jim Heath3 месяцев назад

China will gladly sell Waste to Energy systems @~$250 per annual ton of capacity.

Фото профиля Steve
Steve3 месяцев назад

China, one of the most heavily populated countries, figured out how to deal with trash, but the supposed geniuses in India would rather bathe in it while they eat cow shit.

Фото профиля 肅正協議🔞
肅正協議🔞3 месяцев назад

西方世界估计早就忘了,科技的发展是为了造福人类这个目标。光想着用来剥削赚钱了。

Фото профиля TruthObserver
TruthObserver3 месяцев назад

Meanwhile, in some third world country called UK, plastic films and plastic bags are no longer treated as recyclables because the recycling plant can't handle them. So UK is solving the problem not by AI but policy change and polluting the environment.

Фото профиля Ratio_Disputati
Ratio_Disputati3 месяцев назад

Start shipping it in from India. There’s piles of garbage higher than the Himalayas and rivers of garbage larger than the Amazon River. There’s an endless infinity of garbage strewn around, free for the taking, in India. Just watch out for the human feces.

Фото профиля Steve Smith
Steve Smith 3 месяцев назад

In America trash is sorted by SEIU....then buried in landfills to contaminate the water supply killing 2 birds with 1 stone, a regulatory monopoly used to fill party coffers plus a tool to destroy assets not owned by party elites (municipal water supplies).

Фото профиля Tom Goodwin
Tom Goodwin3 месяцев назад

How come it still takes so long to get my bag scanned at the airport?

Фото профиля Doug Wiser
Doug Wiser3 месяцев назад

This is what happens when you educate your population. The opposite happens when you praise the poorly educated.

Фото профиля Richard Bardon
Richard Bardon3 месяцев назад

Also typical that China is using AI to help get rid of garbage, while the West uses AI to create it 🙃

Фото профиля Arun Mukherjee
Arun Mukherjee3 месяцев назад

But isn’t burning plastics polluting? The reason the waste is not burned in the western countries?

Фото профиля Jenny Griffyn (Andersson)
Jenny Griffyn (Andersson)3 месяцев назад

What a communal society can achieve when its leadership has the wisdom, integrity & courage to protect the public sector (incl the gov) from private “interests” Decisions based on what’s good for the public long term Colonial capitalism = private owning & controlling the public

Фото профиля Tux
Tux3 месяцев назад

@smerkinkones See, whilst our country argues over Russia & wanks it's self off over AI data centres, China are just getting on with advancing their lives

Фото профиля Guru Nimenunir1
Guru Nimenunir13 месяцев назад

Start buying up landfills now - that's where the precious metals are going. Plasma ought to make it feasible.

Фото профиля Don Miguel🍺
Don Miguel🍺3 месяцев назад

You people are retarded. They've just build more incineration plants than they need. The tech is old and is used all over the world. It's just bad planning and they put a PR BS on top of it The garbage that you can burn or recycle is just a small % of total garbage. BS propaganda

Фото профиля Proud Black🌍
Proud Black🌍3 месяцев назад

Just amazing how China becomes 🤗

Фото профиля 588th Night Bomber Regiment
588th Night Bomber Regiment3 месяцев назад

We have that tech since the first oil crisis and i´m pretty sure we shared said tech with China back in the 1980´s or 1990´s... (

Фото профиля Leinad Nosregor
Leinad Nosregor3 месяцев назад

China sorts recycling robotically meanwhile in parts of the UK you need to sort your waste into as many as 3 or 4 different bins. China is thinking about efficiency on a societal scale, the UK only thinks about the immediate costs and not the long term impact.

Фото профиля HokeyPokey
HokeyPokey3 месяцев назад

when Landfills become MINES we are on the right track again.

Фото профиля Charles Wood
Charles Wood3 месяцев назад

Where there is muck, there's brass!

Фото профиля Markus Kasperczyk 🇩🇪
Markus Kasperczyk 🇩🇪3 месяцев назад

@JewelAnneNonny THIS is how AI should be used

Фото профиля Rakkhi Joy
Rakkhi Joy3 месяцев назад

It's not entirely a good news story 1. 1000 plants is over capacity when they are running only at 60% 2. Burning trash still pumps massive amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere 3. Fly ash: categorised as a hazardous material China's plants generated 13m tones in 2024

Фото профиля Elon Muskrat
Elon Muskrat3 месяцев назад

China steadily becomes more and more an example for the planet. The Chinese economy is a bubble waiting to burst? The Chinese economy is just getting going. I for one, am deeply grateful.

Фото профиля ☭ LXRED - Blue Check free since 2011.
☭ LXRED - Blue Check free since 2011.3 месяцев назад

Meanwhile, the US is using AI to bomb kids’ schools, produce AI slop, and undermine the education system.

Фото профиля Michael Baran
Michael Baran3 месяцев назад

Looks like China ahead of the game moving towards 100% waste management systems. Problems> opportunity > solutions. While reducing excess consumption is optimal, for the time being keeping waste out of natures habitat is the priority..

Фото профиля graeme totten
graeme totten3 месяцев назад

Recircular economy is the only real way humanity can sustain the current use of the planets finite resourses

Фото профиля 💗 CHINAPILLED 💗
💗 CHINAPILLED 💗3 месяцев назад

@PubicZirconium !!!!! I always thought it would be cool if AI could somehow be used for recycling, but this is so much cooler than I even imagined!

Фото профиля Elisa
Elisa3 месяцев назад

The most absurd thing about this is that HUMANS ARE THE ONLY SPECIES THAT CREATES GARBAGE!!! Think about that! No other living creatures produces waste!!

Фото профиля Steven Cheng
Steven Cheng3 месяцев назад

spent weeks tuning a vision rig to sort scrap, meanwhile real plants actually run out of feedstock, my delta arm would probably short circuit from embarrassment

Фото профиля Ryan Milton 弥瑞恩
Ryan Milton 弥瑞恩3 месяцев назад

and into power, and electricity

Фото профиля MSMFree
MSMFree3 месяцев назад

@MayMayln Garbage in but Good stuff Out, imagine that!

Похожие видео

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

41,812 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

China slaps down Palau’s malicious attempt to hijack South Pacific island nations and manufacture a regional security crisis out of China’s normal missile tests. China tested a missile into the high seas. China is not a subscriber to the Hague Code of Conduct and is therefore not bound by its notification mechanism. Yet China still issued navigation and airspace warnings and notified relevant states in advance. Meanwhile, the United States has conducted more than 300 ICBM tests and roughly 200 SLBM tests. Washington has given China advance notice only once — in November 2024, after China had first notified the US of its own September launch. And now Palau is behaving as though China owes it a permission slip to conduct a lawful military test in the Pacific. This is the most ironic part: Palau has fewer than 20,000 people and its government has convinced itself that the Pacific is its private backyard. The high seas are not Palauan territorial waters. You do not get to turn an entire ocean into your private security perimeter and then demand that another Pacific power ask your permission to operate in international waters. Palau has sovereignty over Palau. It does not have sovereignty over the Pacific. If China conducts a lawful test in the high seas, your displeasure does not magically create jurisdiction. China is a Pacific country too. The Pacific is not Palau’s private swimming pool, and it certainly is not an American-administered firing range where only Washington gets to normalize missile testing. If every Chinese test is going to trigger a regional morality play, then perhaps China simply has not tested often enough for everyone to get used to the fact that it is a Pacific military power. America tested hundreds of times and made it background noise. China conducts a rare public test and everyone suddenly discovers trauma. Maybe the problem is not the missile. Maybe the problem is that the monopoly is over.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

59,279 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

China’s warning about Japan’s re-militarization is not just a warning to Tokyo. It is a warning to the entire region. Japan’s economy has fallen back to roughly its 1992 level in nominal dollar terms, while China has grown into the world’s second-largest economy. China’s military spending has long remained below 1.5% of GDP. Even if Japan pushes defense spending to 5% of its GDP, it still cannot match China’s scale, industrial capacity, military R&D, shipbuilding, missile production, or strategic depth. So let us be honest: Japan’s re-militarization is not a real military threat to China. Japan cannot fight China. The real danger is to the smaller countries that keep telling China to “move on” from history. Japan once invaded, occupied, burned, raped, enslaved, and massacred across Asia. China. Korea. The Philippines. Indonesia. Singapore. Malaysia. Vietnam. Myanmar. Cambodia. Laos. Half of Asia remembers what Imperial Japan did. Or at least it should. The reason Japan has behaved like a “peaceful country” after 1945 is not because Japanese militarism suddenly grew a conscience. It is because the postwar order pulled out the beast’s fangs. And because China became too strong to be swallowed again. Now, as the U.S.-led order weakens, Japan’s Neo-fascist forces are testing the cage. They call it “defense.” They call it “counterstrike capability.” They call it “normalization.” But Asia has heard these words before. Japan has always known how to dress aggression in polite language. Today Japan does not dare confront China directly. So it provokes China, hides behind Washington, cries about Chinese “bullying,” and performs weakness for the Western press. That theater creates a useful illusion: Japan is peaceful. China is aggressive. But the real historical danger is not that Japan will defeat China. It is that Japan will once again turn its militarism toward countries that cannot fight back. And here is the part those countries should understand: China will not sacrifice Chinese soldiers to protect client states that choose the “Indo-Pacific” containment camp and help Tokyo and Washington pressure China. The Chinese people would not allow it. If some countries believe they can cut themselves off from China, stand with Japan, erase history, and become “higher-class Asians” under the U.S. umbrella, then they should prepare to live with the consequences. Japan was restrained by defeat. Not by remorse. And when the leash loosens, the first victims are rarely the strong.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

29,439 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад