Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The most brutal part is not that China is using AI to sort garbage. It is that China has pushed waste management so far that the old problem has reversed. China used to worry about having too much garbage to process. Now some waste-to-energy plants are facing the opposite...

459,480 views โ€ข 3 months ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

38 Comments

Space Cadet's profile picture
Space Cadet3 months ago

This is the future I have imagined about a decade ago, but I was thinking the United States would do it. I'm glad to see China figuring it out.

Polly St. George's profile picture
Polly St. George3 months ago

they make fake food out of it, even! And people eat it! what a great country.

๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ's profile picture
๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ3 months ago

Your country even funds euthanasia for the poor, and Congress openly pays homage to the Nazis; your jealousy is truly disgusting.

Muffa Connection Caporale Scelto's profile picture
Muffa Connection Caporale Scelto3 months ago

@FringeViews Thing is that some countries just DIRECTLY PRODUCE JUNK FOOD not as a mean to recycling, just directly producing actual garbage to be eaten. There's some kinda difference, imho... ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ's profile picture
๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ3 months ago

@FringeViews No garbage is more rotten and foul than the brain of a colonial lackey.

Muffa Connection Caporale Scelto's profile picture
Muffa Connection Caporale Scelto3 months ago

@FringeViews It's litterally insane to think that #US food is somehow sane..... I agree with walls on the #US borders, if they're meant not to make mess abroad with all of that garbage, and force them in... ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ's profile picture
๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ3 months ago

@FringeViews Then we agree on one thing: the real garbage export is not China turning waste into energy. It is America turning industrial junk food, moral rot, and imperial mess into a global product.

Scott McGrath's profile picture
Scott McGrath3 months ago

Itโ€™s because in the US its frequently more profitable to game the system for profits vs producing goods and services, China has a very simple flat tax system. so in china one is incentivized to make money, in the US play tax games.

Jim Heath's profile picture
Jim Heath3 months ago

China will gladly sell Waste to Energy systems @~$250 per annual ton of capacity.

Steve's profile picture
Steve3 months ago

China, one of the most heavily populated countries, figured out how to deal with trash, but the supposed geniuses in India would rather bathe in it while they eat cow shit.

่‚…ๆญฃๅ”่ญฐ๐Ÿ”ž's profile picture
่‚…ๆญฃๅ”่ญฐ๐Ÿ”ž3 months ago

่ฅฟๆ–นไธ–็•Œไผฐ่ฎกๆ—ฉๅฐฑๅฟ˜ไบ†๏ผŒ็ง‘ๆŠ€็š„ๅ‘ๅฑ•ๆ˜ฏไธบไบ†้€ ็ฆไบบ็ฑป่ฟ™ไธช็›ฎๆ ‡ใ€‚ๅ…‰ๆƒณ็€็”จๆฅๅ‰ฅๅ‰Š่ตš้’ฑไบ†ใ€‚

TruthObserver's profile picture
TruthObserver3 months ago

Meanwhile, in some third world country called UK, plastic films and plastic bags are no longer treated as recyclables because the recycling plant can't handle them. So UK is solving the problem not by AI but policy change and polluting the environment.

Ratio_Disputati's profile picture
Ratio_Disputati3 months ago

Start shipping it in from India. Thereโ€™s piles of garbage higher than the Himalayas and rivers of garbage larger than the Amazon River. Thereโ€™s an endless infinity of garbage strewn around, free for the taking, in India. Just watch out for the human feces.

Steve Smith 's profile picture
Steve Smith 3 months ago

In America trash is sorted by SEIU....then buried in landfills to contaminate the water supply killing 2 birds with 1 stone, a regulatory monopoly used to fill party coffers plus a tool to destroy assets not owned by party elites (municipal water supplies).

Tom Goodwin's profile picture
Tom Goodwin3 months ago

How come it still takes so long to get my bag scanned at the airport?

Doug Wiser's profile picture
Doug Wiser3 months ago

This is what happens when you educate your population. The opposite happens when you praise the poorly educated.

Richard Bardon's profile picture
Richard Bardon3 months ago

Also typical that China is using AI to help get rid of garbage, while the West uses AI to create it ๐Ÿ™ƒ

Arun Mukherjee's profile picture
Arun Mukherjee3 months ago

But isnโ€™t burning plastics polluting? The reason the waste is not burned in the western countries?

Jenny Griffyn (Andersson)'s profile picture
Jenny Griffyn (Andersson)3 months ago

What a communal society can achieve when its leadership has the wisdom, integrity & courage to protect the public sector (incl the gov) from private โ€œinterestsโ€ Decisions based on whatโ€™s good for the public long term Colonial capitalism = private owning & controlling the public

Tux's profile picture
Tux3 months ago

@smerkinkones See, whilst our country argues over Russia & wanks it's self off over AI data centres, China are just getting on with advancing their lives

Guru Nimenunir1's profile picture
Guru Nimenunir13 months ago

Start buying up landfills now - that's where the precious metals are going. Plasma ought to make it feasible.

Don Miguel๐Ÿบ's profile picture
Don Miguel๐Ÿบ3 months ago

You people are retarded. They've just build more incineration plants than they need. The tech is old and is used all over the world. It's just bad planning and they put a PR BS on top of it The garbage that you can burn or recycle is just a small % of total garbage. BS propaganda

Proud Black๐ŸŒ's profile picture
Proud Black๐ŸŒ3 months ago

Just amazing how China becomes ๐Ÿค—

588th Night Bomber Regiment's profile picture
588th Night Bomber Regiment3 months ago

We have that tech since the first oil crisis and iยดm pretty sure we shared said tech with China back in the 1980ยดs or 1990ยดs... (

Leinad Nosregor's profile picture
Leinad Nosregor3 months ago

China sorts recycling robotically meanwhile in parts of the UK you need to sort your waste into as many as 3 or 4 different bins. China is thinking about efficiency on a societal scale, the UK only thinks about the immediate costs and not the long term impact.

HokeyPokey's profile picture
HokeyPokey3 months ago

when Landfills become MINES we are on the right track again.

Charles Wood's profile picture
Charles Wood3 months ago

Where there is muck, there's brass!

Markus Kasperczyk ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช's profile picture
Markus Kasperczyk ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช3 months ago

@JewelAnneNonny THIS is how AI should be used

Rakkhi Joy's profile picture
Rakkhi Joy3 months ago

It's not entirely a good news story 1. 1000 plants is over capacity when they are running only at 60% 2. Burning trash still pumps massive amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere 3. Fly ash: categorised as a hazardous material China's plants generated 13m tones in 2024

Elon Muskrat's profile picture
Elon Muskrat3 months ago

China steadily becomes more and more an example for the planet. The Chinese economy is a bubble waiting to burst? The Chinese economy is just getting going. I for one, am deeply grateful.

โ˜ญ LXRED - Blue Check free since 2011.'s profile picture
โ˜ญ LXRED - Blue Check free since 2011.3 months ago

Meanwhile, the US is using AI to bomb kidsโ€™ schools, produce AI slop, and undermine the education system.

Michael Baran's profile picture
Michael Baran3 months ago

Looks like China ahead of the game moving towards 100% waste management systems. Problems> opportunity > solutions. While reducing excess consumption is optimal, for the time being keeping waste out of natures habitat is the priority..

graeme totten's profile picture
graeme totten3 months ago

Recircular economy is the only real way humanity can sustain the current use of the planets finite resourses

๐Ÿ’— CHINAPILLED ๐Ÿ’—'s profile picture
๐Ÿ’— CHINAPILLED ๐Ÿ’—3 months ago

@PubicZirconium !!!!! I always thought it would be cool if AI could somehow be used for recycling, but this is so much cooler than I even imagined!

Elisa's profile picture
Elisa3 months ago

The most absurd thing about this is that HUMANS ARE THE ONLY SPECIES THAT CREATES GARBAGE!!! Think about that! No other living creatures produces waste!!

Steven Cheng's profile picture
Steven Cheng3 months ago

spent weeks tuning a vision rig to sort scrap, meanwhile real plants actually run out of feedstock, my delta arm would probably short circuit from embarrassment

Ryan Milton ๅผฅ็‘žๆฉ's profile picture
Ryan Milton ๅผฅ็‘žๆฉ3 months ago

and into power, and electricity

MSMFree's profile picture
MSMFree3 months ago

@MayMayln Garbage in but Good stuff Out, imagine that!

Related Videos

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China blocโ€”then disguise containment as โ€œalliance coordination.โ€ That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone elseโ€™s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europeโ€”Americaโ€™s traditional alliance baseโ€”Chinaโ€™s favorability has risen above Americaโ€™s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this โ€œworking with friends.โ€ China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. Americaโ€™s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being โ€œbrainwashedโ€ and spreading โ€œChinese propaganda.โ€ Their problem is not China. Their problem is that Chinaโ€™s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above Chinaโ€”because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ

41,812 views โ€ข 1 month ago

China slaps down Palauโ€™s malicious attempt to hijack South Pacific island nations and manufacture a regional security crisis out of Chinaโ€™s normal missile tests. China tested a missile into the high seas. China is not a subscriber to the Hague Code of Conduct and is therefore not bound by its notification mechanism. Yet China still issued navigation and airspace warnings and notified relevant states in advance. Meanwhile, the United States has conducted more than 300 ICBM tests and roughly 200 SLBM tests. Washington has given China advance notice only once โ€” in November 2024, after China had first notified the US of its own September launch. And now Palau is behaving as though China owes it a permission slip to conduct a lawful military test in the Pacific. This is the most ironic part: Palau has fewer than 20,000 people and its government has convinced itself that the Pacific is its private backyard. The high seas are not Palauan territorial waters. You do not get to turn an entire ocean into your private security perimeter and then demand that another Pacific power ask your permission to operate in international waters. Palau has sovereignty over Palau. It does not have sovereignty over the Pacific. If China conducts a lawful test in the high seas, your displeasure does not magically create jurisdiction. China is a Pacific country too. The Pacific is not Palauโ€™s private swimming pool, and it certainly is not an American-administered firing range where only Washington gets to normalize missile testing. If every Chinese test is going to trigger a regional morality play, then perhaps China simply has not tested often enough for everyone to get used to the fact that it is a Pacific military power. America tested hundreds of times and made it background noise. China conducts a rare public test and everyone suddenly discovers trauma. Maybe the problem is not the missile. Maybe the problem is that the monopoly is over.

๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ

59,279 views โ€ข 14 days ago

Chinaโ€™s warning about Japanโ€™s re-militarization is not just a warning to Tokyo. It is a warning to the entire region. Japanโ€™s economy has fallen back to roughly its 1992 level in nominal dollar terms, while China has grown into the worldโ€™s second-largest economy. Chinaโ€™s military spending has long remained below 1.5% of GDP. Even if Japan pushes defense spending to 5% of its GDP, it still cannot match Chinaโ€™s scale, industrial capacity, military R&D, shipbuilding, missile production, or strategic depth. So let us be honest: Japanโ€™s re-militarization is not a real military threat to China. Japan cannot fight China. The real danger is to the smaller countries that keep telling China to โ€œmove onโ€ from history. Japan once invaded, occupied, burned, raped, enslaved, and massacred across Asia. China. Korea. The Philippines. Indonesia. Singapore. Malaysia. Vietnam. Myanmar. Cambodia. Laos. Half of Asia remembers what Imperial Japan did. Or at least it should. The reason Japan has behaved like a โ€œpeaceful countryโ€ after 1945 is not because Japanese militarism suddenly grew a conscience. It is because the postwar order pulled out the beastโ€™s fangs. And because China became too strong to be swallowed again. Now, as the U.S.-led order weakens, Japanโ€™s Neo-fascist forces are testing the cage. They call it โ€œdefense.โ€ They call it โ€œcounterstrike capability.โ€ They call it โ€œnormalization.โ€ But Asia has heard these words before. Japan has always known how to dress aggression in polite language. Today Japan does not dare confront China directly. So it provokes China, hides behind Washington, cries about Chinese โ€œbullying,โ€ and performs weakness for the Western press. That theater creates a useful illusion: Japan is peaceful. China is aggressive. But the real historical danger is not that Japan will defeat China. It is that Japan will once again turn its militarism toward countries that cannot fight back. And here is the part those countries should understand: China will not sacrifice Chinese soldiers to protect client states that choose the โ€œIndo-Pacificโ€ containment camp and help Tokyo and Washington pressure China. The Chinese people would not allow it. If some countries believe they can cut themselves off from China, stand with Japan, erase history, and become โ€œhigher-class Asiansโ€ under the U.S. umbrella, then they should prepare to live with the consequences. Japan was restrained by defeat. Not by remorse. And when the leash loosens, the first victims are rarely the strong.

๐˜Š๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ๐˜ณ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜ฆ

29,354 views โ€ข 3 months ago