Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

THE MOTTE & BAILEY FALLACY

ahmaddiaa1's profile picture

Ahmad Diaa

176,800 subscribers

30,300 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce •via TikTok

Eğitim
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Motte and Bailey
7:59

Motte and Bailey

MJ Murphy

13,139 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

La Motte The Rupert family farm
0:30

La Motte The Rupert family farm

Greg Davies

90,518 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

This retreating to the "we just want you to have healthcare" motte when we've all see then "kill people for saying things we don't like" and "fuck the white middle class" bailey is getting really old.
0:03

This retreating to the "we just want you to have healthcare" motte when we've all see then "kill people for saying things we don't like" and "fuck the white middle class" bailey is getting really old.

Possum Reviews

16,538 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

This is EXACTLY what’s happening “The political left mastered an old mass manipulation strategy that lets them push any claim, no matter how radical, wrong, or stupid, into the mainstream without ever having to defend it. And once you know it, you'll see it everywhere, even in daily arguments It's called the motte and bailey doctrine - The bailey is the radical, extreme version of a claim - The motte is the small defensible tower next to it, the mild version of the claim In the public's mind, the 2 are never actually separated. They live together as one position. So when someone attacks the bailey, the radical version, the motte gets defended instead, the reasonable version. And because the public sees the motte and bailey as the same claim, successfully defending the motte automatically validates the bailey, too. Attacking the radical position now looks identical to attacking the reasonable one, which makes the radical position untouchable by association” “This is how the Overton Window is moved, through hundreds of small, unwinnable fights over the motte, each one quietly making the bailey a little more acceptable, a little more mainstream, until what used to be radical is just the new normal. And from there, real political power follows” Let me give you a real world easy to understand example of this, Let’s take the Left’s plan to Defund the Police - The Bailey, the radical claim: Democrats say they want to cut or abolish police departments. Reduce their funding so severely that traditional policing becomes impossible - The Motte, the mild, defensible version: Democrats say “We just want to reallocate some money to mental health services, social workers, and community programs so the police don’t have to handle everything.” Here’s how it works, When critics attack the radical version saying something like “You want to abolish the police and leave cities less safe”, the defenders immediately switch to the mild version “No one is saying abolish the police, we just want better resources for communities” But in reality, they plan us to abolish the police The Left uses this tactic ALL THE TIME
2:27

This is EXACTLY what’s happening “The political left mastered an old mass manipulation strategy that lets them push any claim, no matter how radical, wrong, or stupid, into the mainstream without ever having to defend it. And once you know it, you'll see it everywhere, even in daily arguments It's called the motte and bailey doctrine - The bailey is the radical, extreme version of a claim - The motte is the small defensible tower next to it, the mild version of the claim In the public's mind, the 2 are never actually separated. They live together as one position. So when someone attacks the bailey, the radical version, the motte gets defended instead, the reasonable version. And because the public sees the motte and bailey as the same claim, successfully defending the motte automatically validates the bailey, too. Attacking the radical position now looks identical to attacking the reasonable one, which makes the radical position untouchable by association” “This is how the Overton Window is moved, through hundreds of small, unwinnable fights over the motte, each one quietly making the bailey a little more acceptable, a little more mainstream, until what used to be radical is just the new normal. And from there, real political power follows” Let me give you a real world easy to understand example of this, Let’s take the Left’s plan to Defund the Police - The Bailey, the radical claim: Democrats say they want to cut or abolish police departments. Reduce their funding so severely that traditional policing becomes impossible - The Motte, the mild, defensible version: Democrats say “We just want to reallocate some money to mental health services, social workers, and community programs so the police don’t have to handle everything.” Here’s how it works, When critics attack the radical version saying something like “You want to abolish the police and leave cities less safe”, the defenders immediately switch to the mild version “No one is saying abolish the police, we just want better resources for communities” But in reality, they plan us to abolish the police The Left uses this tactic ALL THE TIME

Wall Street Apes

107,665 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

From the river to la Grande Motte …
1:00

From the river to la Grande Motte …

Arthur_Officiel

153,492 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

David Sacks exposes the Motte and Bailey fallacy happening in AI debates. David Sacks "Be honest about what's happening today. In the first three years after the launch of AI chatbots, there's been no discernible disruption to the labor market, and the early studies and data are showing wage increases and actually job increases. And there's definitely job increases in blue collars because of the construction boom." @jason "This has been our first debate club corner. Every week we're going to teach you how to debate better here."
2:09

David Sacks exposes the Motte and Bailey fallacy happening in AI debates. David Sacks "Be honest about what's happening today. In the first three years after the launch of AI chatbots, there's been no discernible disruption to the labor market, and the early studies and data are showing wage increases and actually job increases. And there's definitely job increases in blue collars because of the construction boom." @jason "This has been our first debate club corner. Every week we're going to teach you how to debate better here."

jay plemons

79,082 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Beware of the sunken cost fallacy…
1:47

Beware of the sunken cost fallacy…

BigMac

15,637 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 the fallacy of “Africans sold Africans“ ..
1:54

🚨 the fallacy of “Africans sold Africans“ ..

Semitic Jew

131,186 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Sahil Adeem and the Jaanu German fallacy:
0:58

Sahil Adeem and the Jaanu German fallacy:

The Pakistan Experience

22,802 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Mick Terrill vs. Florian De La Motte 🥊💥 Mick Terrill shut the lights off with a devastating knockout. Florian De La Motte never saw it coming. 😴🔥
0:33

Mick Terrill vs. Florian De La Motte 🥊💥 Mick Terrill shut the lights off with a devastating knockout. Florian De La Motte never saw it coming. 😴🔥

🐝

806,124 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

BARTELBROS UNITE The Unc Cost Fallacy
0:20

BARTELBROS UNITE The Unc Cost Fallacy

Harrison Faigen

14,748 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

The organ donor fallacy is absolutely sinister.
2:05

The organ donor fallacy is absolutely sinister.

illuminatibot

898,665 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Organ Harvesting and the Brain Death Fallacy
5:04

Organ Harvesting and the Brain Death Fallacy

Greg Reese

61,930 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The appeal to authority fallacy of Indian Atheists 🤡
1:04

The appeal to authority fallacy of Indian Atheists 🤡

Śrēyān Singh Rajput

23,907 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Truth or Fallacy?
0:59

Sensitive content

Truth or Fallacy?

@𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗷𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗯𝗼𝘆

44,521 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

slippery slope fallacy
1:08

slippery slope fallacy

フブキ👑 Letourneau🫃(librarian)

464,770 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

We are so uneducated that we think the word "semitic" in "anti-semitic" encompasses all semites. Words have a particular context. The etymology fallacy is a fallacy for a reason.
0:58

We are so uneducated that we think the word "semitic" in "anti-semitic" encompasses all semites. Words have a particular context. The etymology fallacy is a fallacy for a reason.

شرق‌زده sharghzadeh

23,022 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Logical fallacy after logical fallacy. Fallacy of relative privation. Red herring. Appeal to (alleged) hypocrisy. Straw-man. No wonder she is a Lindsay Clancy kinslayer apologist, she struggles with logic.
0:32

Logical fallacy after logical fallacy. Fallacy of relative privation. Red herring. Appeal to (alleged) hypocrisy. Straw-man. No wonder she is a Lindsay Clancy kinslayer apologist, she struggles with logic.

Brian Atlas

16,481 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce