Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The new Epstein email about Jared Kushner operating as a co-president during Trump's first term has been suggested before. Former New Jersey Governor, Chris Christie said in an interview that Jared Kushner was the second most powerful man in the White House behind Donald Trump. Christie also said that...

967,916 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

👏👏👏Chamath Palihapitiya thought very little of President Trump when he came into office. But as time passes, he realizes how wrong his outlook was. The ultra-successful businessman and early executive at Facebook shows how a true free thinker can adjust their opinions. The whole All-In Pod also praised Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, a senior advisor to Trump and in charge of brokering peace between Israel and Palestine. Kushner's recent long-form interview on Lex Friedman's podcast brought praise. Chamath: "But Jared Kushner is thoughtful. He's smart. I was fed all these lies for years about how this guy was, like, moping around in the shadows and this and that, and it was all not true. David Sacks: "[Trump] was willing to meet with Kim Jong Un. He was willing to meet with Putin and Xi Jinping, and he avoided criticizing them personally. He didn't call them dictators. He talked about how smart they are. It's the art of the deal. Right. I mean, at the end of the day, he's looking to do business, and we need a little bit more of that. And I think this is why Jared Kushner was successful. He went in there with the mindset of a businessman. How do we find something that's beneficial to both sides?" Chamath: "I think that when Trump was elected, I was told that it was the end of the world, and that's what I thought. And I'd already underwritten him as an F, okay? And then, four years into the presidency, he was probably like a C in my mind. And then, as I get a little bit of distance away, I realized, no, hold on a second. This guy was like a B, B-plus. Like, he was pretty good. "But the further and further I get away from him and the less emotional I am, he did a pretty good job. He was a pretty good president." The All-In Podcast Chamath Palihapitiya David Sacks @jason

Bernie was a PSYOP

2,088,866 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨Hunter Biden SLAMS Jared Kushner and Don Jr and the Iran War! “Whatever you think about my father's policies, do you know one thing he didn't do? He didn't greenlight to turn Gaza into a Trump Golf Course with the maitre d' being Jared Kushner with $4 Billion in Saudi money! They had a problem with me as being this emblem of corruption. Don Jr. got the single largest loan guarantee from the Department of Defense EVER HANDED OUT of over $600 MILLION for a fusion energy company of which he has ZERO experience. They have gotten Jared Kushner, who's never run a private equity fund, has now a $4 BILLION private equity fund with 80% of the money coming from the Middle East of which he continues to raise as he is the ambassador-at-large on behalf of the Trump administration. Not as a political appointee, but simply as a son-in-law of the president to come to a peace deal of a war in Iran that THEY STARTED that has cost the economy BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars for a war that NOBODY WANTED. That EVERY president before him was pressured by the Israelis to get into and every single one, regardless what you think of them from George from Jimmy Carter through President Reagan, through both of the Bushes, through Clinton, through my dad said, ‘you're out of your damn minds!’ So who benefits right now? You know who benefits? The people that are making trades of billions of dollars on market manipulation that occurred. It's literally out and open, but who's going to do anything about it?”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

39,535 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Tucker Carlson recently interviewed Jewish academic, Bret Weinstein, who spoke out against the policies of Israel. However, Bret didn't think Israel's policies were bad, just bad for Jews. He was appalled that his fellow Jews intepreted his criticism of Israel as him betraying "Team Jew." Truly remarkable. The moral of the story is that Jews generally don't make judgements using universal principles like "killing civilians is bad" or "bombing civilian infrastructure is wrong." Their principle is very particular: "is it good for Jews?" When reading Jewish academic writing, you'll get a sense of how ubiquitous this rationale is among Jews: "Is it good for Jews? – a question as old, in all probability, as the Jewish Diaspora itself – has not quite reached the end of its ancient career as a useful guide to thought." - Norman Podhoretz "I think they [anti-Jewish policies] warrant a revival among Jews of that ancient and prematurely laughed-off question, is it good for the Jews?" - Nathaniel Glazer "Is Europe good for the Jews?" - Steven Beller "And now a new generation of Jews comes to announce that 'Is it good for the Jews?' is an entirely reasonable, indeed self-respecting standard according to which the sociopolitical realm may be assessed. Some even insist it is the only appropriate standard." - Leonard Fein "Is it gut far Yidden?" - American Jewish Congress Setting aside the fact that the collective statement "good for Jews" demonstrates that Jews see themselves as a collective group – something they expressly forbid non-Jews from doing – Jews use "is it good for Jews" as a yardstick to measure all things. It is an end towards which everything else is made into a means: politics, history, and even the truth – the truth is not good unless it is good for Jews.

Curse

29,838 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

ALERT: The Trump Criticizes U.S. Withdrawal From Afghanistan, Slams Abandonment of Military Equipment Donald Trump, the president of the United States, has once again sharply criticized the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, describing it as a “shameful day” in American history and condemning the decision to leave behind large amounts of military equipment. Speaking to supporters on Wednesday, Trump blamed the administration of former U.S. president Joe Biden for the way the withdrawal was handled, particularly the departure from Bagram Air Base and the abandonment of American military assets. “Instead of leaving with dignity and strength, they ran away,” Trump said. “There was really no reason for it. We were there, and I had said we would leave with power and dignity.” Trump added that although the Taliban did not like him, they would still carry out what he asked. “The Taliban didn’t like me, but they did whatever I wanted,” he said. He also criticized the decision to leave behind U.S. military equipment in Afghanistan, saying he had insisted that all equipment should be removed during the withdrawal. “I emphasized that every piece of equipment should leave with us,” Trump said. “But they claimed it was cheaper to abandon the aircraft.” Trump argued that the decision made little sense, noting that a new fighter jet can cost about $150 million and could have been flown out simply by refueling, yet officials still insisted on leaving the aircraft behind.

The Khorasan Diary

13,878 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

NEW: Alvin Bragg's former colleague and current CNN legal analyst is calling out the rigged Trump case, even accusing Judge Juan Merchan of violating the law. Elie Honig says the trial "blew his mind" as he called it an "unjustified mess." "The judge donated money - a tiny amount of $35, but in plain violation of a rule prohibiting New York judges from making political donations of any kind to a pro-Biden, anti-Trump political operation," he wrote in the NY Magazine. "The charges against Trump are obscure and nearly entirely unprecedented. In fact, no state prosecutor... has ever charged federal election laws as a direct or predicate state crime, against anyone, for anything." "None. Ever. Even putting aside the specifics of election law, the Manhattan DA itself almost never brings any case in which falsification of business records is the only charge." "The charges against Trump aren’t just unusual. They’re bespoke, seemingly crafted individually for the former president and nobody else," he said as he called the case "Frankenstein" because it was pieced together. During a segment on CNN, Honig said his mind was blown when the judge determined that the jury didn't need to know what the other crime Trump committed was. "I need to call this out... Prosecutors have to prove falsified records for another crime. Defense lawyers were begging him." "They have to know what the other crime is, and prosecutors were saying, 'no, let's keep it very vague and general.' It's a bizarro world." "I know that there is some aggressive reading of the New York statute that says, 'well, the jury doesn't really have to know what the other crime is.' But to me that suggests that the DA's office is hellbent on getting the conviction now and worry about the fallout."

Collin Rugg

3,782,853 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren