Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The official reason? Content moderation concerns. But beneath the surface, a bigger battle was brewing: The clash between traditional media control and digital freedom of speech. Disney wasn't alone in their move:

1,142,991 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 18

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

In November 2023, Disney tried to destroy X (Twitter). They pulled their ads and cost Elon $75M in revenue. But instead of backing down... Elon told their CEO to go f*** himself. Here's the unbelievable story of how one decision cost Disney $200B:

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

November 2023. Disney's CEO Bob Iger made a decision that would spark one of the most explosive corporate feuds in history: He pulled all of Disney's ads from X (formerly Twitter). What followed would reshape the future of media forever...

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

Apple, Coca-Cola, and Comcast joined the advertising exodus. Musk's response? Refreshingly direct for a tech CEO: He challenged Bob Iger publicly, questioning Disney's own content standards. But beneath the surface, something bigger was happening:

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

X was facing a crucial moment. 90% of the platform's revenue came from advertising. The boycott by major brands cost X an estimated $75 million in revenue. But instead of backing down, Musk took a stand:

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

In the first half of 2023, X generated $1.48 billion in revenue. That's a 40% drop compared to the same period in 2022. At the DealBook Summit, Musk made his position clear: "These advertisers are trying to blackmail me with money."

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

Then came the statement that would echo through Wall Street: "If they kill the company, the whole world will know that those advertisers killed the company." This wasn't just about revenue anymore. It was about standing up for principles.

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

While Disney remained silent, Musk spoke directly to his audience. No PR spin. No corporate doublespeak. Just raw, unfiltered communication with his followers. Then the story took an unexpected turn:

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

Rumors of Musk potentially acquiring Disney started circulating. Wall Street analysts scrambled to make sense of it. But there was one major problem: The numbers didn't add up.

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

Disney's market cap was approximately $150 billion. Musk had already invested heavily in Twitter at $44 billion. And now X was facing an advertising challenge. But the acquisition rumors revealed something deeper:

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

This wasn't just about ads anymore. It was innovation vs tradition. Direct communication vs controlled narratives. The future of media was at stake.

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

Then came a twist no one saw coming: The Texas Attorney General launched an investigation into potential collusion among advertisers. X filed a lawsuit against the World Federation of Advertisers, alleging a "systematic illegal boycott." The implications would be massive...

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

The investigation raised unprecedented questions: Could companies legally coordinate their ad spending to influence platform behavior? Was the advertising boycott a legitimate business decision or illegal collusion? But Musk had an ace up his sleeve:

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

This battle exposed something fascinating: Traditional media thought they could control the narrative with ad dollars. But Musk had something more valuable: A personal brand so powerful, he didn't need to bend.

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

Think about it: Most CEOs would cave under advertiser pressure. They'd compromise their vision for ad revenue. But Musk? He stood firm on his principles. Why could he do this?

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

Because he'd built something more valuable than ad revenue: Direct influence over millions of people. His personal brand means he can: • Launch products instantly • Attract talent effortlessly • Raise capital at will All without depending on gatekeepers.

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

This is the future of business: The most powerful founders won't be controlled by advertisers, VCs, or media. They'll have direct relationships with their audience. Building in public. Creating trust at scale. Ready to build the future?

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

Founders: We’ll build your personal/company brand on 𝕏 (and beyond) without you lifting a finger. To date, we've already helped 60+ founders get 2+ Billion combined views. Interested in how we can do this for you? Book your free discovery call here:

Фото профиля Fernando Cao
Fernando Cao1 год назад

Thanks for reading! A bit about me: 2 years ago, I cofounded @ThoughtleadrX — a premium personal branding agency for world-class founders, executives, and investors to dominate socials. If you enjoyed this, hit "follow" for more breakdowns!

Похожие видео

Romania’s presidential election was annulled, triggering intense political debate both domestically and internationally. I spoke with 🇷🇴 George Simion 🇲🇩, president of the country’s largest opposition party, about the implications of this unprecedented decision and about the report released last week by the U.S. Congress addressing concerns over free speech and foreign influence in democratic processes in Europe. The U.S. House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Representative Rep. Jim Jordan, recently conducted an investigation into what it described as a growing “censorship–industrial complex.” The inquiry examined coordination between governments, supranational institutions, and major technology platforms in moderating online content. Particular attention was given to the European Union’s Digital Services Act (#DSA), a landmark regulation that came fully into force in 2024 and imposes strict obligations on large online platforms to combat illegal content, disinformation, and systemic risks. According to the Committee’s findings, EU institutions—including the European Commission—played a significant role in shaping content moderation policies across major platforms. The report argues that, under the framework of the Digital Services Act, social media companies faced substantial pressure to remove or limit content deemed harmful or misleading, raising concerns among critics about the potential suppression of dissenting voices. The report further claims that digital regulatory interventions and content moderation measures affected political discourse surrounding at least eight elections across six #EU countries. Supporters of the DSA maintain that these measures are necessary to protect democratic processes from foreign interference, coordinated disinformation campaigns, and extremist content. Critics, however, argue that such powers risk being misused in ways that could limit political pluralism and free expression. The debate now centers on a fundamental question: how can democracies protect elections from manipulation (from those in power) while also safeguarding freedom of speech and political competition? Gold Institute for International Strategy General Mike Flynn Călin Georgescu OFFICIAL ACCOUNT Alianța pentru Unirea Românilor #Georgescu #Romania

Rob Roos 🇳🇱

26,785 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад