Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

The One & ONLY HIGH Quality INFLATABLE Platinum cured SILICONE Plug Ever Only Inflatable worth Buying XXL PHAT Long @ElementalToys 10% promo code:WREX10 WreX Wylde #InflatablePlug #InflatableDildo #HolePumping

WreX Wylde

40,943 subscribers

132,377 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #InflatablePlug #InflatableDildo #HolePumping

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨Mal final take on J. Cole's The Fall Off: Mal compares the album to waiting years for sex with a girl you've been chasing, only for it to finally happen but be a bit "off" “it stinks a little, not terrible, still fire in spots, you'd still hit again (and give second chances), but it's underwhelming after the long wait and high anticipation” “J. Cole is still one of the greatest rappers ever, discography remains amazing, this doesn't change that. But personally underwhelmed for a project anticipated for almost 10 years”

🚨Mal final take on J. Cole's The Fall Off: Mal compares the album to waiting years for sex with a girl you've been chasing, only for it to finally happen but be a bit "off" “it stinks a little, not terrible, still fire in spots, you'd still hit again (and give second chances), but it's underwhelming after the long wait and high anticipation” “J. Cole is still one of the greatest rappers ever, discography remains amazing, this doesn't change that. But personally underwhelmed for a project anticipated for almost 10 years”

CY Chels

135,490 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨 It's shocking how many people go through chemo and radiation only to eventually die from the treatment — not the cancer itself. Sergeant Ric Schiff, a San Francisco police officer, told this heartbreaking story in court: One of his twin daughters Crystin was diagnosed with a brain tumor at just 4 years old. Doctors gave her aggressive chemo and radiation, warning it had a high chance of killing her. She miraculously survived the treatment… but the cancer remained. They were told she didn’t have long to live. Desperate for another option, they found Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski and his non-toxic antineoplastons therapy. The cancer was cured. But it was too late. The massive radiation and chemo had already caused irreversible brain deterioration. Crystin died from the damage caused by the conventional treatment — not the cancer. Sergeant Schiff believes real cures have been hidden and that the system profits from keeping people alive just long enough to keep paying for toxic treatments. This is one of the most powerful testimonies you’ll ever hear. Watch it here:

🚨 It's shocking how many people go through chemo and radiation only to eventually die from the treatment — not the cancer itself. Sergeant Ric Schiff, a San Francisco police officer, told this heartbreaking story in court: One of his twin daughters Crystin was diagnosed with a brain tumor at just 4 years old. Doctors gave her aggressive chemo and radiation, warning it had a high chance of killing her. She miraculously survived the treatment… but the cancer remained. They were told she didn’t have long to live. Desperate for another option, they found Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski and his non-toxic antineoplastons therapy. The cancer was cured. But it was too late. The massive radiation and chemo had already caused irreversible brain deterioration. Crystin died from the damage caused by the conventional treatment — not the cancer. Sergeant Schiff believes real cures have been hidden and that the system profits from keeping people alive just long enough to keep paying for toxic treatments. This is one of the most powerful testimonies you’ll ever hear. Watch it here:

Dr. Dawn Michael

41,139 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

Warren Buffett’s best advice had nothing to do with stocks. A teacher asked him what to tell high schoolers about preparing for retirement. His answer: forget retirement. Think about the car. Imagine a genie gives you any car you want at 16. Rolls-Royce, Jaguar, anything. Completely free. One catch: it’s the only car you’ll ever own. What do you do? You read the manual ten times. You garage it. You change the oil twice as often as needed. You fix every nick the same day it appears. Because there’s no replacement coming. Then Buffett makes the turn: Your students get exactly one mind and one body. The same one at 17 is the one they’re working with at 50 and 60. Neglect it and you’ll have a wreck. Maintain it and you’ll have a real asset. He’d pay $50,000 for 10% of any college grad’s future earnings. No money in their pocket required. That makes them worth $500,000 on day one. Just for having a good mind and a healthy body. “Their main asset is themselves. Develop the habits that maintain and enhance that asset, and they’ll have a very good car at 60. If they don’t, they’ll have a wreck.” The best investment you’ll ever make isn’t in the market. It’s in yourself.

Warren Buffett’s best advice had nothing to do with stocks. A teacher asked him what to tell high schoolers about preparing for retirement. His answer: forget retirement. Think about the car. Imagine a genie gives you any car you want at 16. Rolls-Royce, Jaguar, anything. Completely free. One catch: it’s the only car you’ll ever own. What do you do? You read the manual ten times. You garage it. You change the oil twice as often as needed. You fix every nick the same day it appears. Because there’s no replacement coming. Then Buffett makes the turn: Your students get exactly one mind and one body. The same one at 17 is the one they’re working with at 50 and 60. Neglect it and you’ll have a wreck. Maintain it and you’ll have a real asset. He’d pay $50,000 for 10% of any college grad’s future earnings. No money in their pocket required. That makes them worth $500,000 on day one. Just for having a good mind and a healthy body. “Their main asset is themselves. Develop the habits that maintain and enhance that asset, and they’ll have a very good car at 60. If they don’t, they’ll have a wreck.” The best investment you’ll ever make isn’t in the market. It’s in yourself.

Black Edge

17,834 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I found one of the most interesting Polymarket traders. He only trades weather markets. No crypto. No politics. No macro. Just weather. $23 → $6,146 $10 → $5,000 $6 → $3,401 78% win rate. +$47,000 P&L in under 3 months. Profile: Copytrade: (As always: verify data independently and understand execution risks before copying any strategy.) Most of his gains are expressed in percentage terms. His approach targets 10,000–20,000% returns by buying extremely cheap contracts. Not random bets. Deep out-of-the-money pricing. When contracts are trading at $0.01–$0.03, even small probability shifts create massive percentage returns. He’s likely using structured weather data — possibly NOAA-based tools — but the real edge isn’t just the forecast. It’s how he prices risk versus reward. He waits for mispriced tails. Small size. High asymmetry. Repeated consistently. Weather markets are inefficient. Low competition. Slow repricing. Emotion-driven entries. This wallet is worth studying — not just for the market selection, but for the return structure behind it.

Phantom_Defi

37,801 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Marc Andreessen just collapsed a fifty-year assumption in one sentence. Andreessen: “I’m not sure there will even be a salient concept of a programming language in the way that we understand it today.” Not declining. Not evolving. Gone. For fifty years, humans learned machine syntax to command computers. We bent our cognition to fit their grammar. We built entire careers on how fluently we could speak a language machines wrote the rules for. That was always backwards. The correction is arriving faster than the industry will say out loud. Andreessen didn’t stop there. Andreessen: “You may not need user interfaces.” Then came the only question left. Who uses software in the future? Other bots. Follow that to its end. The screen. The dashboard. The browser. The app. The dropdown menu. Every interface ever built assumed a human on the other end who needed the world made legible. If the user is a machine, none of that is necessary. The entire visual layer of computing was built for biological eyes. When the primary users are no longer biological, that layer doesn’t get updated. It gets stripped. Andreessen drew the comparison himself. Not long ago, 99% of humanity was behind a plow. The world spent generations asking what people would do when farming disappeared. The answer was everything worth doing. We are at that exact moment again. Except this time, the plow is a keyboard. Andreessen: “I’m going to tell the thing what I need, and it’s going to do it in whatever way is most optimal.” That sentence deletes the entire skills economy built around execution. Not judgment. Not taste. Not the ability to want the right things. Just execution. That part is over. Which means the only thing left that matters is the quality of what you want. Most people have spent their entire careers getting better at building. Almost no one has spent that time getting better at knowing what to build. That gap is about to become the only gap that matters. The friction of execution is gone. What you can imagine is what you can build. The question is whether you’ve ever trained that muscle. Most people haven’t.

Marc Andreessen just collapsed a fifty-year assumption in one sentence. Andreessen: “I’m not sure there will even be a salient concept of a programming language in the way that we understand it today.” Not declining. Not evolving. Gone. For fifty years, humans learned machine syntax to command computers. We bent our cognition to fit their grammar. We built entire careers on how fluently we could speak a language machines wrote the rules for. That was always backwards. The correction is arriving faster than the industry will say out loud. Andreessen didn’t stop there. Andreessen: “You may not need user interfaces.” Then came the only question left. Who uses software in the future? Other bots. Follow that to its end. The screen. The dashboard. The browser. The app. The dropdown menu. Every interface ever built assumed a human on the other end who needed the world made legible. If the user is a machine, none of that is necessary. The entire visual layer of computing was built for biological eyes. When the primary users are no longer biological, that layer doesn’t get updated. It gets stripped. Andreessen drew the comparison himself. Not long ago, 99% of humanity was behind a plow. The world spent generations asking what people would do when farming disappeared. The answer was everything worth doing. We are at that exact moment again. Except this time, the plow is a keyboard. Andreessen: “I’m going to tell the thing what I need, and it’s going to do it in whatever way is most optimal.” That sentence deletes the entire skills economy built around execution. Not judgment. Not taste. Not the ability to want the right things. Just execution. That part is over. Which means the only thing left that matters is the quality of what you want. Most people have spent their entire careers getting better at building. Almost no one has spent that time getting better at knowing what to build. That gap is about to become the only gap that matters. The friction of execution is gone. What you can imagine is what you can build. The question is whether you’ve ever trained that muscle. Most people haven’t.

Dustin

66,373 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

For informational and educational purposes only. Closed course, professional activity. No sales, transfers, or solicitation. All firearms are legally owned and operated in compliance with federal, state, and local laws. A completely unmodified Ruger 10/22 might be the best prepper and homesteading rifle ever made. If you're new to shooting, this is where you start. If you've been shooting since Nixon was in office, this is what you'd grab if you could only pick one. Why it earns the title: Low recoil makes it easy to train with, easy for new shooters to learn on, and easy on your shoulder over a long range session. Lightweight enough to carry all day without thinking about it. Accurate out of the box. Reliable. Easy to clean and field strip. And the aftermarket support is endless if you ever want to customize it (though you don't need to). Is it your home defense weapon of choice? No. But it can fill that gap if it has to. What it is: a small game and food gathering machine. Rabbits, squirrels, varmints, predators threatening your livestock. A 10/22 handles all of it with surgical precision. A few things worth knowing: .22 LR ammunition is the cheapest mainstream round on the market, which means you can actually practice. With .22 LR you can put thousands of rounds downrange a year without going broke. It runs reliably on a wide range of ammo, from cheap bulk pack to premium hollow points. Few rifles are this forgiving. Stock long ammo too. Modern .22 LR ammunition stored cool and dry keeps for decades. Societies without access to guns are much easier to control. Don't be that society.

For informational and educational purposes only. Closed course, professional activity. No sales, transfers, or solicitation. All firearms are legally owned and operated in compliance with federal, state, and local laws. A completely unmodified Ruger 10/22 might be the best prepper and homesteading rifle ever made. If you're new to shooting, this is where you start. If you've been shooting since Nixon was in office, this is what you'd grab if you could only pick one. Why it earns the title: Low recoil makes it easy to train with, easy for new shooters to learn on, and easy on your shoulder over a long range session. Lightweight enough to carry all day without thinking about it. Accurate out of the box. Reliable. Easy to clean and field strip. And the aftermarket support is endless if you ever want to customize it (though you don't need to). Is it your home defense weapon of choice? No. But it can fill that gap if it has to. What it is: a small game and food gathering machine. Rabbits, squirrels, varmints, predators threatening your livestock. A 10/22 handles all of it with surgical precision. A few things worth knowing: .22 LR ammunition is the cheapest mainstream round on the market, which means you can actually practice. With .22 LR you can put thousands of rounds downrange a year without going broke. It runs reliably on a wide range of ammo, from cheap bulk pack to premium hollow points. Few rifles are this forgiving. Stock long ammo too. Modern .22 LR ammunition stored cool and dry keeps for decades. Societies without access to guns are much easier to control. Don't be that society.

Rob Benson

27,871 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

Ray Dalio is saying "buy gold for survival of wealth" Yes, Gold doesn’t give cash flows, No dividends, No earnings growth & also the legend Mr. Buffet says only invest in income generating assets ! Yet central banks across the world are buying it at record pace. Why??? Because it’s the only asset: • No counterparty risk • No default risk • No currency risk 📊 Some hard facts: • 2022–2024: 3,300+ tonnes bought by central banks, one of the strongest accumulation phases in decades • 2025: ~863 tonnes added, far above long term average of ~400–500 tonnes • 2026 outlook: ~750–800 tonnes expected, showing continued structural demand • Q1 2026 alone: ~244 tonnes bought, strong start despite high prices • Monthly trend: Jan ~5 tonnes → Feb ~27 tonnes → March saw a sharp pickup • Buying continues even at record high prices, clearly not price sensitive • Central banks now contribute ~17% of global gold demand • Gold is now a ~$4 trillion reserve asset, increasingly competing with traditional reserves • Over the last 20 years: gold has delivered ~10% CAGR globally • For Indian investors: INR depreciation ~3–4% yearly adds to returns • That means effective returns in India have often been low double digit, quietly • Global central banks bought ~1,000+ tonnes combined in 2023 & 2024 alone • This is like a long term reserve diversification Well, if 80–90% of your portfolio sits in equities, real estate, or businesses, then your entire wealth is dependent on three things: growth, liquidity & confidence staying intact. That works beautifully in normal times & this is how compounding happens. But markets are not linear. there are phases when liquidity tightens, currencies weaken & debt cycles peak & we face unknown uncertainties. That is where gold behaves very differently as it does not depend on earnings nor does it depend on policy support. It does not depend on growth assumptions or anything like that. It simply holds value when the system is under stress & that's the real beauty of #GOLD ! That is exactly why central banks are accumulating it at this scale & it is not for returns. It is sort of a balance sheet protection. For an investor, this is the takeaway: Gold is not there to outperform your portfolio. It is there to protect it. That’s why Dalio says 5% to 15% exposure is a solid strategy. This is to ensure you don’t go broke in extreme cycles. Simple rule of GOLD Exposure: • <5% = you are ignoring risk • 5–10% = balanced • 10–15% = defensive positioning Your wealth needs to be protected by assets that survive when compounding gets interrupted. Video credits to : Nikhil Kamath Ray Dalio

Ray Dalio is saying "buy gold for survival of wealth" Yes, Gold doesn’t give cash flows, No dividends, No earnings growth & also the legend Mr. Buffet says only invest in income generating assets ! Yet central banks across the world are buying it at record pace. Why??? Because it’s the only asset: • No counterparty risk • No default risk • No currency risk 📊 Some hard facts: • 2022–2024: 3,300+ tonnes bought by central banks, one of the strongest accumulation phases in decades • 2025: ~863 tonnes added, far above long term average of ~400–500 tonnes • 2026 outlook: ~750–800 tonnes expected, showing continued structural demand • Q1 2026 alone: ~244 tonnes bought, strong start despite high prices • Monthly trend: Jan ~5 tonnes → Feb ~27 tonnes → March saw a sharp pickup • Buying continues even at record high prices, clearly not price sensitive • Central banks now contribute ~17% of global gold demand • Gold is now a ~$4 trillion reserve asset, increasingly competing with traditional reserves • Over the last 20 years: gold has delivered ~10% CAGR globally • For Indian investors: INR depreciation ~3–4% yearly adds to returns • That means effective returns in India have often been low double digit, quietly • Global central banks bought ~1,000+ tonnes combined in 2023 & 2024 alone • This is like a long term reserve diversification Well, if 80–90% of your portfolio sits in equities, real estate, or businesses, then your entire wealth is dependent on three things: growth, liquidity & confidence staying intact. That works beautifully in normal times & this is how compounding happens. But markets are not linear. there are phases when liquidity tightens, currencies weaken & debt cycles peak & we face unknown uncertainties. That is where gold behaves very differently as it does not depend on earnings nor does it depend on policy support. It does not depend on growth assumptions or anything like that. It simply holds value when the system is under stress & that's the real beauty of #GOLD ! That is exactly why central banks are accumulating it at this scale & it is not for returns. It is sort of a balance sheet protection. For an investor, this is the takeaway: Gold is not there to outperform your portfolio. It is there to protect it. That’s why Dalio says 5% to 15% exposure is a solid strategy. This is to ensure you don’t go broke in extreme cycles. Simple rule of GOLD Exposure: • <5% = you are ignoring risk • 5–10% = balanced • 10–15% = defensive positioning Your wealth needs to be protected by assets that survive when compounding gets interrupted. Video credits to : Nikhil Kamath Ray Dalio

Advait Arora

93,358 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

43 Years Ago Today — On June 3, 1983, WarGames hit theaters and gave us one of the most chilling tech thrillers ever made. A curious kid hacks into a military supercomputer, starts a game of “Global Thermonuclear War,” and nearly triggers the real thing. Matthew Broderick, Ally Sheedy, and that unforgettable countdown… pure 80s perfection. Each year I ask Grok how long it would take for it to simulate the same scenario, last year it was about 10 minutes...with a special conditon, Grok emphasised each year... see below. This year, 2026 on the anniversary of the film, I asked Grok (xAI’s AI) the big question from the film: How long would it take a modern AI like Grok to simulate a full Global Thermonuclear War scenario? Answer: Seconds for high-level insights, minutes for detailed probabilistic simulations — a massive leap from WOPR’s 26+ hours in 1983. Computing power and AI have come that far! Each year Grok after my asking this, Grok concludes with... "Yet the movie’s ultimate lesson remains as true today as it was then: “The only winning move is not to play.”" At least we know Grok won't be starting WWIII... I have seen other Ai's coming out with chilling answers, which don't end well for us... us being humans. Wargames the movie is a rollercoaster ride, that still holds up today. Who else still loves this film?

43 Years Ago Today — On June 3, 1983, WarGames hit theaters and gave us one of the most chilling tech thrillers ever made. A curious kid hacks into a military supercomputer, starts a game of “Global Thermonuclear War,” and nearly triggers the real thing. Matthew Broderick, Ally Sheedy, and that unforgettable countdown… pure 80s perfection. Each year I ask Grok how long it would take for it to simulate the same scenario, last year it was about 10 minutes...with a special conditon, Grok emphasised each year... see below. This year, 2026 on the anniversary of the film, I asked Grok (xAI’s AI) the big question from the film: How long would it take a modern AI like Grok to simulate a full Global Thermonuclear War scenario? Answer: Seconds for high-level insights, minutes for detailed probabilistic simulations — a massive leap from WOPR’s 26+ hours in 1983. Computing power and AI have come that far! Each year Grok after my asking this, Grok concludes with... "Yet the movie’s ultimate lesson remains as true today as it was then: “The only winning move is not to play.”" At least we know Grok won't be starting WWIII... I have seen other Ai's coming out with chilling answers, which don't end well for us... us being humans. Wargames the movie is a rollercoaster ride, that still holds up today. Who else still loves this film?

Commodore Computer Museum 🕹

16,892 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Ludvig Åberg breaks down his strategy for every hole at Augusta National in TGJ Podcast #207: 00:01:11 But first, some LEGO talk. 00:10:52 No. 1: The hardest pin on the course. 00:14:42 No. 2: Left is dead, so you have to love the bunker. 00:18:36 No. 3: "I've got trust issues with banking it into the hill." 00:22:49 No. 4: The most visually deceptive hole at Augusta. 00:25:02 No. 5: "It's long and has one of the hardest greens." 00:27:07 No. 6: Hit it high to fit the swirling wind 00:29:46 No. 7: The simplest hole, but only if you hit the fairway. 00:31:22 No. 8: More uphill than you think. 00:33:31 No. 9: "It sets up for a low cut or low skank." 00:39:04 No. 10: The left side of the fairway is the place to be. 00:41:56 No. 11: "If I could ever take back one shot, it'd be here." 00:43:50 No. 12: Limit the external factors as much as you can. 00:48:23 No. 13: Ludvig is a reformed doubter of the pull of Rae's Creek. 00:52:15 No. 14: It's birdie or bust. 00:54:20 No. 15: The layup debate in the caddie room is real. 00:57:56 No. 16: "The highlights make the left pin look automatic. It’s not." 00:59:26 No. 17: Rae's Creek has some mythical pull up here too. 01:01:15 No. 18: Rory's winning putt was harder than you think. 01:07:57 The last book Ludvig read is exactly what you'd expect.

Ludvig Åberg breaks down his strategy for every hole at Augusta National in TGJ Podcast #207: 00:01:11 But first, some LEGO talk. 00:10:52 No. 1: The hardest pin on the course. 00:14:42 No. 2: Left is dead, so you have to love the bunker. 00:18:36 No. 3: "I've got trust issues with banking it into the hill." 00:22:49 No. 4: The most visually deceptive hole at Augusta. 00:25:02 No. 5: "It's long and has one of the hardest greens." 00:27:07 No. 6: Hit it high to fit the swirling wind 00:29:46 No. 7: The simplest hole, but only if you hit the fairway. 00:31:22 No. 8: More uphill than you think. 00:33:31 No. 9: "It sets up for a low cut or low skank." 00:39:04 No. 10: The left side of the fairway is the place to be. 00:41:56 No. 11: "If I could ever take back one shot, it'd be here." 00:43:50 No. 12: Limit the external factors as much as you can. 00:48:23 No. 13: Ludvig is a reformed doubter of the pull of Rae's Creek. 00:52:15 No. 14: It's birdie or bust. 00:54:20 No. 15: The layup debate in the caddie room is real. 00:57:56 No. 16: "The highlights make the left pin look automatic. It’s not." 00:59:26 No. 17: Rae's Creek has some mythical pull up here too. 01:01:15 No. 18: Rory's winning putt was harder than you think. 01:07:57 The last book Ludvig read is exactly what you'd expect.

The Golfer's Journal

157,909 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Really excited sharing the first look at our modular clothing items for #Earth2 🌍✌️ (will be gone in #3hrs) From concept art, to 3D sculpting, high poly, low poly, baking, rigging, skinning, animating + other steps in the pipeline. Only 3,000 will ever be available, #congrats to those who grabbed some! In the future #LimitedEdition drops will be less frequent, especially after #E2V1 releases as we will then move more to randomised time limited drops without limited supply. For example, less limited supply drops and more unlimited drops with items being available X times a month, or year etc. The #LimitedSupply drops we release leading up to #E2V1 are more for those who want something that was an early edition and might be a bit rarer long term. Remember they are only for #aesthetic & #collectible purposes. The modular clothing system we're building means you can own any one of these items and interchange them on a variety of avatars. So it's not like buying a set skin, but items you can mix & match. Perhaps not in #Chapter1, but long term there will be gameplay that allows you to apply clothing alterations such as fabrics, colours and so forth, drastically changing to look of your clothes. Some #Players may even offer tailor services for those who don't have time to alter themselves. I also want to build a system where the #community can submit designs, vote on them & if our design + 3D team approve we can do joint collab releases from time to time. This would be something in the future though, we have other higher priorities to focus on now. Anyway, I just wanted to share a little more insight for those interested & if you want to learn more about how the #blueprint system will work, or just to refresh your memory, be sure to check out: Christmas rolled in here now, just went midnight, so hope you guys have a safe and #MerryChristmas with family and loved ones🙏 #Earth2 #Metaverse #Collectibles #Avatar #Modular

Shane Isaac 🌍2️⃣

16,445 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The beef in most South African supermarkets and butcheries quietly contains something far more concerning than price: residues of synthetic hormonal growth promotants. Standard commercial practice (still used on 80–90 % of feedlot cattle): *Ear implants containing trenbolone acetate (a powerful anabolic steroid), zeranol (an oestrogen mimic), and estradiol (female hormone). *These are deliberately inserted to increase weight gain by 20–30 % and improve feed efficiency. The European Union banned every one of these substances in 1989 after its scientific committees concluded that long-term safety especially for children and hormone-sensitive individuals, could not be guaranteed. Yet South Africa, the USA, Brazil, Australia and others continue the practice and we import thousands of tons of implanted beef every year. Peer-reviewed studies link chronic low-dose exposure to these compounds with: *Gynecomastia (breast development in boys and men) *Precocious puberty in young girls *Reduced sperm quality and fertility *Disrupted fat metabolism and insulin sensitivity. We are fifth-generation commercial farmers running a large-scale feedlot and cropping operation. Fifteen years ago we removed every hormonal implant and growth-promoting antibiotic from our system. We still achieve 1.7–1.9 kg daily gain, 60–65 % A-grade carcasses and excellent marbling using only pasture, silage and non-GMO grain. It is not more difficult, it is simply a choice to put consumer health ahead of maximum short-term profit. Next time you shop, ask one simple question at the counter: “Was this animal ever implanted with hormonal growth promotants?” If the answer is not an immediate, documented “No”, you are choosing convenience over long-term family health. Clean, hormone-free beef exists in commercial volumes. We and many other producers supply it every day. Your children’s normal development and your own hormonal health are worth the small additional cost. Know your farmer. Demand transparency. Choose better ‼️ PS- In the video you will see our cattle are tagged with names such as Steak, T-Bone and Sirloin. All fed one pasture, silage and non GMO grain.

The beef in most South African supermarkets and butcheries quietly contains something far more concerning than price: residues of synthetic hormonal growth promotants. Standard commercial practice (still used on 80–90 % of feedlot cattle): Ear implants containing trenbolone acetate (a powerful anabolic steroid), zeranol (an oestrogen mimic), and estradiol (female hormone). These are deliberately inserted to increase weight gain by 20–30 % and improve feed efficiency. The European Union banned every one of these substances in 1989 after its scientific committees concluded that long-term safety especially for children and hormone-sensitive individuals, could not be guaranteed. Yet South Africa, the USA, Brazil, Australia and others continue the practice and we import thousands of tons of implanted beef every year. Peer-reviewed studies link chronic low-dose exposure to these compounds with: Gynecomastia (breast development in boys and men) Precocious puberty in young girls Reduced sperm quality and fertility Disrupted fat metabolism and insulin sensitivity. We are fifth-generation commercial farmers running a large-scale feedlot and cropping operation. Fifteen years ago we removed every hormonal implant and growth-promoting antibiotic from our system. We still achieve 1.7–1.9 kg daily gain, 60–65 % A-grade carcasses and excellent marbling using only pasture, silage and non-GMO grain. It is not more difficult, it is simply a choice to put consumer health ahead of maximum short-term profit. Next time you shop, ask one simple question at the counter: “Was this animal ever implanted with hormonal growth promotants?” If the answer is not an immediate, documented “No”, you are choosing convenience over long-term family health. Clean, hormone-free beef exists in commercial volumes. We and many other producers supply it every day. Your children’s normal development and your own hormonal health are worth the small additional cost. Know your farmer. Demand transparency. Choose better ‼️ PS- In the video you will see our cattle are tagged with names such as Steak, T-Bone and Sirloin. All fed one pasture, silage and non GMO grain.

RaiZel

63,890 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Nvidia just made its biggest acquisition ever... A small startup. On Christmas Eve. While everyone was distracted. The startup is Groq. They make AI chips that run faster than Nvidia's. In September, Groq raised $750 million at a $6.9 billion valuation. Investors included BlackRock, Samsung, Cisco, and Donald Trump Jr.'s fund 1789 Capital. Yesterday, Nvidia paid $20 billion for them. That's a 3x markup in 90 days. Trump Jr. just made a fortune overnight. But the money isn't even the craziest part... Nvidia dominates AI chips. They have 90%+ market share. All of big tech depends on them. So why would they pay 3X for a tiny competitor? Let me explain: Groq was building inference chips that threatened Nvidia's monopoly. Faster processing. Lower costs. Better architecture. If Groq succeeded, they'd crack open the market. So Nvidia did what monopolies always do: bought them before they became a threat. They're buying silence - not innovation. And this isn't a one-off. In September, Nvidia spent $900 million on Enfabrica, another AI chip startup. Same playbook. They committed $100 billion to OpenAI with a requirement that OpenAI deploy 10 gigawatts of Nvidia products. Now $20 billion for Groq. Nvidia isn't competing anymore. They're consolidating. They're using their cash pile to swallow every potential rival before they grow. The founder and CEO of Groq, Jonathan Ross, is joining Nvidia. So is the president and the entire leadership team. Groq's cloud business will keep running independently. But the tech, the IP, the competitive advantage? All Nvidia's now. This is the largest acquisition Nvidia has EVER made. Their previous record was $7 billion for Mellanox in 2019. They just tripled that. And nobody's questioning why. Everyone's celebrating "innovation" and "consolidation" and "strategic partnerships." But what actually happened is this: Nvidia looked at the one company that could challenge their monopoly and paid whatever it took to kill them. $20 billion is cheap insurance when you're worth trillions. The only question left is who's next.

Nvidia just made its biggest acquisition ever... A small startup. On Christmas Eve. While everyone was distracted. The startup is Groq. They make AI chips that run faster than Nvidia's. In September, Groq raised $750 million at a $6.9 billion valuation. Investors included BlackRock, Samsung, Cisco, and Donald Trump Jr.'s fund 1789 Capital. Yesterday, Nvidia paid $20 billion for them. That's a 3x markup in 90 days. Trump Jr. just made a fortune overnight. But the money isn't even the craziest part... Nvidia dominates AI chips. They have 90%+ market share. All of big tech depends on them. So why would they pay 3X for a tiny competitor? Let me explain: Groq was building inference chips that threatened Nvidia's monopoly. Faster processing. Lower costs. Better architecture. If Groq succeeded, they'd crack open the market. So Nvidia did what monopolies always do: bought them before they became a threat. They're buying silence - not innovation. And this isn't a one-off. In September, Nvidia spent $900 million on Enfabrica, another AI chip startup. Same playbook. They committed $100 billion to OpenAI with a requirement that OpenAI deploy 10 gigawatts of Nvidia products. Now $20 billion for Groq. Nvidia isn't competing anymore. They're consolidating. They're using their cash pile to swallow every potential rival before they grow. The founder and CEO of Groq, Jonathan Ross, is joining Nvidia. So is the president and the entire leadership team. Groq's cloud business will keep running independently. But the tech, the IP, the competitive advantage? All Nvidia's now. This is the largest acquisition Nvidia has EVER made. Their previous record was $7 billion for Mellanox in 2019. They just tripled that. And nobody's questioning why. Everyone's celebrating "innovation" and "consolidation" and "strategic partnerships." But what actually happened is this: Nvidia looked at the one company that could challenge their monopoly and paid whatever it took to kill them. $20 billion is cheap insurance when you're worth trillions. The only question left is who's next.

Ricardo

224,264 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

This launch is one of the most exciting and important decisions we have ever made. In the traditional gaming industry, KingNet ( company , is well-known as the developer of the game 《The Legend of MIR 》, Over the past decade, KingNet has supported its operations through a three-pronged business model of research and development, publishing, and investment + IP, launching 100+ high-quality games to date. Web3's building has been ongoing for nearly two years. We have established a brand-new game studio SmileCobra Studio , and establish long-term cooperative relationships with some big guys like TON 💎 BNB Chain Solana Scroll Delphinus Lab ($ZKWASM) Cocos Studio and others. However, after speaking with many developers, we found that before a real user consumption scenario is formed, one of the main challenges many teams face is how to reduce game development costs. So it's best time to learn about Xingyi AI model : the first AI industrialization pipeline, making game production truly "automated". Check here: What problem we want to solve? 1. High Production Costs: Traditional animation design and refinement can cost anywhere from several thousand to tens of thousands of dollars, making it difficult for small startup teams to afford. 2. Long Development Cycles: The fluidity and consistency of animations have always been one of the most time-consuming aspects of development. Designers often spend weeks to achieve a satisfactory result. With Xingyi, it only takes a few steps and minutes to generate the desired animation. 3. Inefficient Collaboration: In the past, game development was usually divided into multiple stages, each managed by independent teams responsible for art, planning, programming, and other roles. The smooth transition between stages relied on high levels of team collaboration and communication. The Xingyi toolchain breaks the traditional division of labor, promoting automation and collaboration across various stages. 4. Automated but Not Passive: Outside of the automated processes, developers are the true creators of the game. Xingyi makes prototype validation and adjustments more scientific and efficient. We will gradually open source the underlying model of Xingyi and make it available to interested collaboration developers (DM is open). We have already made various agent material generation available, and you can try it now: Finally, we would like to discuss a point that many people are concerned about, why was there a launch at @pumpdotfun and it was abandoned? The most important reason is that we lacked experience in the first launch and were affected by snipers and the market. We conducted wallet statistics and found that, excluding bots, a total of 25 addresses suffered a loss of approximately 17 sol. We will use the trading fee of Launch Coin on Believe to airdrop these accounts and apologize again for our mistake. Also, thank you to Launch Coin on Believe for the smooth launch and long-term creative sharing with the builders, only $KNET CA is : CfVs3waH2Z9TM397qSkaipTDhA9wWgtt8UchZKfwkYiu $KNET not representing any equity interests of the parent company , $KNET is a meme, but at the same time, it’s not just a meme. $KNET will play a key role in the consumption scenarios of the KingnetAI ecosystem—imagine having to continuously spend $KNET each time you generate the game modules you want. Gamefi is died？ NO, AI-Gaming just begain here .

Kingnet AI

187,843 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Bill Ackman is quietly building the next Berkshire Hathaway In a recent interview, he laid out how he plans to deliver 20%+ returns - using Warren Buffett’s blueprint Here’s how he’s doing it: "So our day job, as a firm, is buying minority stakes in companies and helping make them more successful. We like to own them for long periods of time — typically 2%, 5%, or 10% positions. While we don’t have control, we’re often influential shareholders. I’ve always admired Mr. Buffett. If you look at his history: in 1955, he started a small partnership. By 1962, he began buying into a struggling textile company because it was cheap. By 1968, he had control — but of a not-so-great business. He eventually wound down his hedge fund, tired of the volatility of outside capital, and shifted to building a permanent capital vehicle. Buffett was essentially an activist hedge fund manager early on. He took control of Berkshire, bought an insurance company and a bank, and over time built what’s now a trillion-dollar business. He’s been an unofficial mentor of mine. In our case, we own 47% of Howard Hughes Corp — a very different kind of public company. It builds and owns cities. It’s underappreciated by the market and, like early Berkshire, trades cheaply. We’re also in the process of either buying or building an insurance company. The goal is long-term compounding by owning businesses, not just stocks. The insurance company will hold stock investments, much like Berkshire does. What’s unique about Berkshire is that it combines a world-class insurance operation with a high-performing investment arm. Most insurance companies focus only on underwriting. Most investment firms only manage capital. Berkshire does both. And the structure matters. A standalone insurance company faces tighter investment regulations. But if it's owned by a well-capitalized holding company, you get more flexibility. Rating agencies care more about the parent company's strength than just capital levels. Credit ratings are critical — no one buys insurance from a poorly rated firm. Buffett's insurance companies benefit from being owned by a diversified, non-insurance parent with strong credit and low leverage. That gives him more freedom to invest insurance assets in equities — not just bonds. Our plan is similar. Pershing Square is very well-capitalized, with ~$30 billion in assets. That supports our 47% stake in Howard Hughes. HHC benefits from having a financially strong parent. It’s already a solid business, with about $5 billion in equity. We’ve also started an insurance subsidiary within HHC. Thanks to the structure, we’ll have similar investment flexibility as Berkshire — using insurance float to compound returns. Pershing Square has compounded at ~23% annually over 21 years (pre-fees). Since we raised permanent capital, returns have been ~27–28% over the last eight years. So the business model is this: Use a profitable insurance company to generate low-cost liabilities Invest those assets at high returns Compound capital over the long term That’s the blueprint — and we’re using Howard Hughes to follow it."

Bill Ackman is quietly building the next Berkshire Hathaway In a recent interview, he laid out how he plans to deliver 20%+ returns - using Warren Buffett’s blueprint Here’s how he’s doing it: "So our day job, as a firm, is buying minority stakes in companies and helping make them more successful. We like to own them for long periods of time — typically 2%, 5%, or 10% positions. While we don’t have control, we’re often influential shareholders. I’ve always admired Mr. Buffett. If you look at his history: in 1955, he started a small partnership. By 1962, he began buying into a struggling textile company because it was cheap. By 1968, he had control — but of a not-so-great business. He eventually wound down his hedge fund, tired of the volatility of outside capital, and shifted to building a permanent capital vehicle. Buffett was essentially an activist hedge fund manager early on. He took control of Berkshire, bought an insurance company and a bank, and over time built what’s now a trillion-dollar business. He’s been an unofficial mentor of mine. In our case, we own 47% of Howard Hughes Corp — a very different kind of public company. It builds and owns cities. It’s underappreciated by the market and, like early Berkshire, trades cheaply. We’re also in the process of either buying or building an insurance company. The goal is long-term compounding by owning businesses, not just stocks. The insurance company will hold stock investments, much like Berkshire does. What’s unique about Berkshire is that it combines a world-class insurance operation with a high-performing investment arm. Most insurance companies focus only on underwriting. Most investment firms only manage capital. Berkshire does both. And the structure matters. A standalone insurance company faces tighter investment regulations. But if it's owned by a well-capitalized holding company, you get more flexibility. Rating agencies care more about the parent company's strength than just capital levels. Credit ratings are critical — no one buys insurance from a poorly rated firm. Buffett's insurance companies benefit from being owned by a diversified, non-insurance parent with strong credit and low leverage. That gives him more freedom to invest insurance assets in equities — not just bonds. Our plan is similar. Pershing Square is very well-capitalized, with ~$30 billion in assets. That supports our 47% stake in Howard Hughes. HHC benefits from having a financially strong parent. It’s already a solid business, with about $5 billion in equity. We’ve also started an insurance subsidiary within HHC. Thanks to the structure, we’ll have similar investment flexibility as Berkshire — using insurance float to compound returns. Pershing Square has compounded at ~23% annually over 21 years (pre-fees). Since we raised permanent capital, returns have been ~27–28% over the last eight years. So the business model is this: Use a profitable insurance company to generate low-cost liabilities Invest those assets at high returns Compound capital over the long term That’s the blueprint — and we’re using Howard Hughes to follow it."

Triple Net Investor

103,422 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Jeff Bezos on why he protects his mornings, his sleep, and his decision-making: Bezos is asked about his unusual routine. No meetings before 10 a.m., eight hours of sleep, no PowerPoints. He walks through the philosophy behind it. He starts with the morning: "I like to putter in the morning. I get up early. I go to bed early. I get up early. I like to putter in the mornings. I like to read the newspaper. I like to have coffee. I like to have breakfast with my kids before they go to school." That puttering time, he says, is non-negotiable. It's why his first meeting is at 10. And the timing of meetings isn't accidental either: "I like to do my high IQ meetings before lunch. Like anything that's going to be really mentally challenging, that's a 10 o'clock meeting. And because by 5:00 p.m. I'm like, I can't think about that today. Let's try this again tomorrow at 10:00 a.m." Then he gets to sleep. He prioritises eight hours, and frames it not as self-care but as a job requirement: "I think better. I have more energy. My mood is better… As a senior executive, what do you really get paid to do? As a senior executive, you get paid to make a small number of high quality decisions. Your job is not to make thousands of decisions every day. Is that really worth it if the quality of those decisions might be lower because you're tired or grouchy or any number of things?" Bezos is careful to note this isn't universal advice. A 100-person startup is a different story. But Amazon isn't a startup, and at his level the math changes, fewer decisions, higher stakes, longer time horizons. Which leads to the part of the philosophy that ties it all together. He doesn't think his executives should be focused on the current quarter at all: "They work in the future. They live in the future. None of the people who report to me should really be focused on the current quarter… We'll have a good quarterly conference call and Wall Street will like our quarterly results and people will stop me and say, 'Congratulations on your quarter,' and I say thank you. But what I'm really thinking is that quarter was baked 3 years ago. Right now I'm working on a quarter that's going to reveal itself in 2021 sometime." The whole system, the slow morning, the protected sleep, the morning-only hard meetings, the three-year horizon points at one thing: "If I make like three good decisions a day, that's enough."

Jeff Bezos on why he protects his mornings, his sleep, and his decision-making: Bezos is asked about his unusual routine. No meetings before 10 a.m., eight hours of sleep, no PowerPoints. He walks through the philosophy behind it. He starts with the morning: "I like to putter in the morning. I get up early. I go to bed early. I get up early. I like to putter in the mornings. I like to read the newspaper. I like to have coffee. I like to have breakfast with my kids before they go to school." That puttering time, he says, is non-negotiable. It's why his first meeting is at 10. And the timing of meetings isn't accidental either: "I like to do my high IQ meetings before lunch. Like anything that's going to be really mentally challenging, that's a 10 o'clock meeting. And because by 5:00 p.m. I'm like, I can't think about that today. Let's try this again tomorrow at 10:00 a.m." Then he gets to sleep. He prioritises eight hours, and frames it not as self-care but as a job requirement: "I think better. I have more energy. My mood is better… As a senior executive, what do you really get paid to do? As a senior executive, you get paid to make a small number of high quality decisions. Your job is not to make thousands of decisions every day. Is that really worth it if the quality of those decisions might be lower because you're tired or grouchy or any number of things?" Bezos is careful to note this isn't universal advice. A 100-person startup is a different story. But Amazon isn't a startup, and at his level the math changes, fewer decisions, higher stakes, longer time horizons. Which leads to the part of the philosophy that ties it all together. He doesn't think his executives should be focused on the current quarter at all: "They work in the future. They live in the future. None of the people who report to me should really be focused on the current quarter… We'll have a good quarterly conference call and Wall Street will like our quarterly results and people will stop me and say, 'Congratulations on your quarter,' and I say thank you. But what I'm really thinking is that quarter was baked 3 years ago. Right now I'm working on a quarter that's going to reveal itself in 2021 sometime." The whole system, the slow morning, the protected sleep, the morning-only hard meetings, the three-year horizon points at one thing: "If I make like three good decisions a day, that's enough."

Business Nerd

15,340 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce