Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
The only match at Wimbledon between Federer and Djokovic where Federer was close to his prime. Federer, 30 years old, beat Djokovic, 25 years old, quite clearly, 3 sets to 1
431,519 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 10

tbf Nadal said 2017 Federer was the best he ever played but not sure if that was specific to their matchup or not with the forehand to backhand pattern

Imagine discrediting your favorite player to try to tear down another. Fed won 5 titles in 2014 and 6 in 2015 but apparently that was way past his prime. This is legit disrespectful to Roger

You are so fucking parhetic Roger wil be ashamed to have classless fans. Plus Federer beat again Nadal in 2017 but here old age is not an excuse

RF during his prime on grass was a force 🔥🔥

💯 the fact that Federer should have beaten Djoker in the Wimbledon final where he was nearly 40 years old isnt talked about enough. Federer was miles away from his prime at that point

yep. fed at his prime easily better than djokovic at his prime on grass. federer won 7 Wimbledons at his prime/close to it and Djokovic won 4 Wimbledons. and fed's Wim 2003-07 > djokovic's best in Wim 15.

@ChaosShaan

Massive Federer fan but that is wrong - Federer struggled with Back Injury at Wimbledon 2012 - nearly lost to Benneteau & lost a set to Malisse . His level in 2019 was phenomenal especially SF & Final - just missed so many break point chances in final .

What year was this?

Nadal and federer will always be better then djokovic in the grand scheme- but what djokovic has been able to do is still unbelievable , hope he gets 25



