正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🇮🇷 The pattern of these strikes points somewhere specific: prepping for an amphibious landing or island invasion. Brandon Weichert reads the recent military strikes as anything but random. The specific targets, he argues, heavily indicate forces actively prepping the battlespace for a potential amphibious landing or island invasion. But...

58,622 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran just struck a Himars battery in Kuwait, the first time since the ceasefire, and the U.S. answered with what's being described as 140 targets in a single wave. This isn't a skirmish anymore. Brandon Weichert, geopolitical analyst, joined me as the strikes pushed deeper into Iran than anything since the war paused, hitting Ahvaz airport and a heavy-water nuclear facility at Khondab for the first time in this round. His read: this isn't random escalation. It's a campaign to strip Iran of any ability to threaten the Strait of Hormuz, aimed at a scenario where a Marine expeditionary unit eventually seizes Kharg Island itself to physically control the chokepoint. "I don't think any of this is going to work, though, and I think it's going to get all of our troops either captured or killed." He doesn't think degrading Iran's capability makes the regime more compliant. He thinks it makes it more desperate, and a failed landing on Kharg could be the trigger that pushes the conflict toward nuclear escalation, not from Iran, but from an American president unwilling to absorb a defeat of that scale. Meanwhile Israel's gone quiet, reportedly stretched thin on interceptors and pulling back its own position in Lebanon rather than expanding it. If the objective really is a permanent grip on the Strait rather than a quick resolution, is this the kind of war that ends in months, or the kind that just becomes the new baseline for the region? Brandon Weichert

Mario Nawfal

378,905 次观看 • 2 个月前