Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

The plot thickens. And so does the load of manure. AND IT'S ALL ABOUT AVOIDING "COUNTRY OF PARTICULAR CONCERN" DESIGNATION. Reno Goebbels (oops, I mean Omokri) says IT WILL "HELP THE TERRORISTS" AND "HURT THE COMMON MAN." Seriously. That, my friends, is what Orwell called "doublespeak" -- it's how... evil overlords historically control the masses. WHAT THEY ARE AFRAID OF IS ACCOUNTABILITY. This is hidden camera video from our recent trip. We have EVERYTHING. (And I mean EVERYTHING) on film. (And they thought they were surveilling us!) Omokri introduced this man to me and Jeff as "the Chairman of CAN" (the Christian Association of Nigeria). This was supposedly a main pillar of our "fact finding mission" (rather, LIE EXPOSING MISSION). Note that he's speaking to the CAMERA, not to the ones supposedly there to investigate! Further, Omokri repeatedly announced to the world that I had met with "the Chairman of CAN." I was wondering why this dude never showed up in posted photos (at least none that I saw) and was strangely absent from the press conference. Guess what? THIS MAN IS AN IMPOSTER. Top leaders of real CAN have reviewed this video and tell me in no uncertain terms: - “The guy speaking is Rev Joseph Hayab Chairman CAN 19 Northern States and Abuja…but not Legitimate as such with the National President of CAN.” - His organization is not “Legitimate registered with the Federal Government.” - “he did not obtain permission to speak on behalf of the CAN President. Any such position must only come from the office of the National President of CAN” “Chairman of one the factions of ‘Northern CAN.’ Note that it is outside the structure of CAN” Wow. For background, reptilian-spirited Omokri thrust me and Jeff Gibbs into this "meeting" IMMEDIATELY upon our arrival after 30+ hours of travel, without going to our hotel room, grabbing a bite to eat, sipping water, or using the restroom. I begged for 60 seconds to change my shirt. Then it was the three imams, then AriseTV, with no break in between. Thank God -- by His grace and divine leading — He gave us the wits to play this narcissistic little man with plucked eyebrows like a cheap fiddle, and not step into his trap. (I was subtly “flipping the bird” to the camera and making googley eyes when we were standing with the imams for happy group pictures. Wonder why they’re not published?) :-) Wish I could say the same about Trump's daughter's father in law - the ignorant or compromised Tinubu crony "US Envoy" @MassadBouls who smiled as he parroted word-for-word Omokri/Tinubu's genocide-enabling talking points. Just like this imposter and the imams. Word. For. Word. (I keep meticulous records too, by the way…” Thank you for your attention to this matter. #EarthShakershow more

Mike Arnold

47,189 subscribers

117,011 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

A members of Nigeria’s intelligence community admitted that sometime between 2012 and 2014, the US government hosted top Nigerian officers in the kind of seminars for the recruitment and training African traitors that David Hundeyin have described very well this past few weeks. Of course, since this was the recruitment of top officers to betray Nigeria, the seminar did not happen in Accra, this one happened in Boston and Washington. You will notice that even at the time of this confession, this intelligent and experienced man who was a victim of a US government psyop had not realised that Buhari was not his idea. The US government is very good at these psyop. The US government only made them think the idea of Buhari was theirs, exactly as David Hundeyin described in one of his tweets last week. For the intentionally ignorant and brainwashed Nigeria victim of a successful global psyop, executed perfectly, of course by your favourite witty black man, Barack Obama, ask yourself these: 1. What does this man mean by saying top officers of Nigeria’s military intelligence and intelligence agency had a meeting years before the 2015 election with US government and intelligence agency and the purpose of the meeting was to determine who is the best person to be Nigeria’s president by 2015? 2. If this is not foreign interference, then what is? 3. When he insinuated that Tinubu was then activated by the US government and intelligence agency after this meeting to help them make Buhari president, is he not confirming that Tinubu is a US government and intelligence asset? When it comes to USA, the average Nigerian elite and masses see no evil, and sense no evil even if the US ot democrat are caught pant down in a conspiracy. That was why this intelligent man did not realise that he was confessing to treason. Plotting against a sitting president of Nigeria with a foreign government. But because it is US government then there is nothing wrong with that Abi? While I appreciate his candidness in this interview, I really have to point out this disease of the mind that many Nigerians have. It is this disease that is making some people who ordinarily should know better take these ignorant stance on everything democrats and US do against African nations and black people. And it is very sad how many of us are so disloyal to our own people and our own land. History repeats itself. This is capturing your own people and selling them into slavery to white man happening all over again. And many black people are partaking in this wickedness, knowingly and unknowingly, again. It breaks my heart. I am that black man from the heart of that black land, and it breaks my heart that the same people that I fight for, that I’d kill for, that I’d die for, and the ones that want me dead or in chains. If you are one of those struck by this disease, I can educate you, but it is dawning on me that I must first cure this madness before any education can be impactful. This foolishness is heartbreaking.

A members of Nigeria’s intelligence community admitted that sometime between 2012 and 2014, the US government hosted top Nigerian officers in the kind of seminars for the recruitment and training African traitors that David Hundeyin have described very well this past few weeks. Of course, since this was the recruitment of top officers to betray Nigeria, the seminar did not happen in Accra, this one happened in Boston and Washington. You will notice that even at the time of this confession, this intelligent and experienced man who was a victim of a US government psyop had not realised that Buhari was not his idea. The US government is very good at these psyop. The US government only made them think the idea of Buhari was theirs, exactly as David Hundeyin described in one of his tweets last week. For the intentionally ignorant and brainwashed Nigeria victim of a successful global psyop, executed perfectly, of course by your favourite witty black man, Barack Obama, ask yourself these: 1. What does this man mean by saying top officers of Nigeria’s military intelligence and intelligence agency had a meeting years before the 2015 election with US government and intelligence agency and the purpose of the meeting was to determine who is the best person to be Nigeria’s president by 2015? 2. If this is not foreign interference, then what is? 3. When he insinuated that Tinubu was then activated by the US government and intelligence agency after this meeting to help them make Buhari president, is he not confirming that Tinubu is a US government and intelligence asset? When it comes to USA, the average Nigerian elite and masses see no evil, and sense no evil even if the US ot democrat are caught pant down in a conspiracy. That was why this intelligent man did not realise that he was confessing to treason. Plotting against a sitting president of Nigeria with a foreign government. But because it is US government then there is nothing wrong with that Abi? While I appreciate his candidness in this interview, I really have to point out this disease of the mind that many Nigerians have. It is this disease that is making some people who ordinarily should know better take these ignorant stance on everything democrats and US do against African nations and black people. And it is very sad how many of us are so disloyal to our own people and our own land. History repeats itself. This is capturing your own people and selling them into slavery to white man happening all over again. And many black people are partaking in this wickedness, knowingly and unknowingly, again. It breaks my heart. I am that black man from the heart of that black land, and it breaks my heart that the same people that I fight for, that I’d kill for, that I’d die for, and the ones that want me dead or in chains. If you are one of those struck by this disease, I can educate you, but it is dawning on me that I must first cure this madness before any education can be impactful. This foolishness is heartbreaking.

Bankole Otegbeye

160,925 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Don't believe what some say in the news about the Memorial. Here is what President Woodrow Wilson said on Dedication Day June 4, 1914 | Arlington National Cemetery | Dedication Day | Reconciliation Memorial I assure you that I am profoundly aware of the solemn significance of the thing that has now taken place. The Daughters of the Confederacy have presented a memorial of their dead to the Government of the United States. I hope that you have noted the history of the conception of this idea. It was suggested by a President of the United States who had himself been a distinguished officer in the Union Army. It was authorized by an act of Congress of the United States. The corner-stone of the monument was laid by a President of the United States elevated to his position by the votes of the party which had chiefly prided itself upon sustaining the war for the Union, and who, while Secretary of War, had himself given authority to erect it. And, now, it has fallen to my lot to accept in the name of the great Government, which I am privileged for the time to represent, this emblem of a reunited people. I am not so much happy as proud to participate in this capacity on such an occasion: proud that I should represent such a people. Am I mistaken, ladies and gentlemen, in supposing that nothing of this sort could have occurred in anything but a democracy? The people of a democracy are not related to their rulers as subjects are related to a government. They are themselves the sovereign authority, and as they are neighbors of each other, quickened by the same influences and moved by the same motives, they can understand each other. They are shot through with some of the deepest and profoundest instincts of human sympathy. They choose their governments; they select their rulers; they live their own life, and they will not have that life disturbed and discolored by fraternal misunderstandings. I know that a reuniting of spirits like this can take place more quickly in our time than in any other because men are now united by an easier transmission of those influences which make up the foundations of peace and of mutual understanding, but no process can work these effects unless there is a conducting medium. The conducting medium in this instance is the united heart of a great people. I am not going to detain you by trying to repeat any of the eloquent thoughts which have moved us this afternoon, for I rejoice in the simplicity of the task which is assigned to me. My privilege is this, ladies and gentlemen: To declare this chapter in the history of the United States closed and ended, and I bid you turn with me with your faces to the future, quickened by the memories of the past, but with nothing to do with the contests of the past, knowing, as we have shed our blood upon opposite sides, we now face and admire one another. I do not know how many years ago it was that the Century Dictionary was published, but I remember one day in the Century Cyclopedia of Names I had occasion to turn to the name of Robert E. Lee, and I found him there in that book published in New York City simply described as a great American general. The generosity of our judgments did not begin to-day. The generosity of our judgment was made up soon after this great struggle was over. Men came and sat together again in the Congress and united in all the efforts of peace and of government, and our solemn duty is to see that each one of us is in his own consciousness and in his own conduct a replica of this great reunited people. It is our duty and our privilege to be like the country we represent and, speaking no word of malice, no word of criticism even, stand shoulder to shoulder to lift the burdens of mankind in the future and show the paths of freedom to all the world. Please consider reposting. Thank you. @SecDef Pete Hegseth Christopher Bedford The Associated Press Brion McClanahan

Don't believe what some say in the news about the Memorial. Here is what President Woodrow Wilson said on Dedication Day June 4, 1914 | Arlington National Cemetery | Dedication Day | Reconciliation Memorial I assure you that I am profoundly aware of the solemn significance of the thing that has now taken place. The Daughters of the Confederacy have presented a memorial of their dead to the Government of the United States. I hope that you have noted the history of the conception of this idea. It was suggested by a President of the United States who had himself been a distinguished officer in the Union Army. It was authorized by an act of Congress of the United States. The corner-stone of the monument was laid by a President of the United States elevated to his position by the votes of the party which had chiefly prided itself upon sustaining the war for the Union, and who, while Secretary of War, had himself given authority to erect it. And, now, it has fallen to my lot to accept in the name of the great Government, which I am privileged for the time to represent, this emblem of a reunited people. I am not so much happy as proud to participate in this capacity on such an occasion: proud that I should represent such a people. Am I mistaken, ladies and gentlemen, in supposing that nothing of this sort could have occurred in anything but a democracy? The people of a democracy are not related to their rulers as subjects are related to a government. They are themselves the sovereign authority, and as they are neighbors of each other, quickened by the same influences and moved by the same motives, they can understand each other. They are shot through with some of the deepest and profoundest instincts of human sympathy. They choose their governments; they select their rulers; they live their own life, and they will not have that life disturbed and discolored by fraternal misunderstandings. I know that a reuniting of spirits like this can take place more quickly in our time than in any other because men are now united by an easier transmission of those influences which make up the foundations of peace and of mutual understanding, but no process can work these effects unless there is a conducting medium. The conducting medium in this instance is the united heart of a great people. I am not going to detain you by trying to repeat any of the eloquent thoughts which have moved us this afternoon, for I rejoice in the simplicity of the task which is assigned to me. My privilege is this, ladies and gentlemen: To declare this chapter in the history of the United States closed and ended, and I bid you turn with me with your faces to the future, quickened by the memories of the past, but with nothing to do with the contests of the past, knowing, as we have shed our blood upon opposite sides, we now face and admire one another. I do not know how many years ago it was that the Century Dictionary was published, but I remember one day in the Century Cyclopedia of Names I had occasion to turn to the name of Robert E. Lee, and I found him there in that book published in New York City simply described as a great American general. The generosity of our judgments did not begin to-day. The generosity of our judgment was made up soon after this great struggle was over. Men came and sat together again in the Congress and united in all the efforts of peace and of government, and our solemn duty is to see that each one of us is in his own consciousness and in his own conduct a replica of this great reunited people. It is our duty and our privilege to be like the country we represent and, speaking no word of malice, no word of criticism even, stand shoulder to shoulder to lift the burdens of mankind in the future and show the paths of freedom to all the world. Please consider reposting. Thank you. @SecDef Pete Hegseth Christopher Bedford The Associated Press Brion McClanahan

Defend Arlington

34,733 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

I don’t care what anyone says this is an incredible moment. And you can say whatever you want about President Trump, but you can never say that he does not love this country. Or that he’s not proud of it. He is and he shows that to the world and I for one love to see that instead of the apology tours.

I don’t care what anyone says this is an incredible moment. And you can say whatever you want about President Trump, but you can never say that he does not love this country. Or that he’s not proud of it. He is and he shows that to the world and I for one love to see that instead of the apology tours.

Insurrection Barbie

102,926 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

21,983 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

60 years ago, Ronald Reagan gave Americans a warning that has stood the test of time. This is from Reagan's "Time for Choosing" speech: "If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth. And this idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except to sovereign people, is still the newest and most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man. This is the issue of this election. Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves." "You and I are told increasingly that we have to choose between a left or right, but I would like to suggest that there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down--up to a man's age-old dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order--or down to the ant heap totalitarianism, and regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course." ... "Well, I for one resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me--the free man and woman of this country--as 'the masses.' This is a term we haven't applied to ourselves in America. But beyond that, 'the full power of centralized government'--this was the very thing the Founding Fathers sought to minimize. They knew that governments don't control things. A government can't control the economy without controlling people. And they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. They also knew, those Founding Fathers, that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the economy." ... "They say we are always 'against' things, never 'for' anything. Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so." ... "Mr. Democrat himself, Al Smith, the great American, came before the American people and charged that the leadership of his party was taking the part of Jefferson, Jackson, and Cleveland down the road under the banners of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin." ... "Our natural, inalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government, and freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment." ... "You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin--just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it's a simple answer after all." "You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, 'There is a price we will not pay.' There is a point beyond which they must not advance." ... "You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness." Doesn't it feel like Reagan is speaking to us TODAY?

60 years ago, Ronald Reagan gave Americans a warning that has stood the test of time. This is from Reagan's "Time for Choosing" speech: "If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth. And this idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except to sovereign people, is still the newest and most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man. This is the issue of this election. Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves." "You and I are told increasingly that we have to choose between a left or right, but I would like to suggest that there is no such thing as a left or right. There is only an up or down--up to a man's age-old dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order--or down to the ant heap totalitarianism, and regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course." ... "Well, I for one resent it when a representative of the people refers to you and me--the free man and woman of this country--as 'the masses.' This is a term we haven't applied to ourselves in America. But beyond that, 'the full power of centralized government'--this was the very thing the Founding Fathers sought to minimize. They knew that governments don't control things. A government can't control the economy without controlling people. And they know when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose. They also knew, those Founding Fathers, that outside of its legitimate functions, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector of the economy." ... "They say we are always 'against' things, never 'for' anything. Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they are ignorant, but that they know so much that isn't so." ... "Mr. Democrat himself, Al Smith, the great American, came before the American people and charged that the leadership of his party was taking the part of Jefferson, Jackson, and Cleveland down the road under the banners of Marx, Lenin, and Stalin." ... "Our natural, inalienable rights are now considered to be a dispensation of government, and freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp as it is at this moment." ... "You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin--just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it's a simple answer after all." "You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, 'There is a price we will not pay.' There is a point beyond which they must not advance." ... "You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness." Doesn't it feel like Reagan is speaking to us TODAY?

Kyle Becker

104,357 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

We have already prepared our part of the homework ahead of the meeting with President Trump – both the military component and the economic one. Every detail is ready. The agenda of our meeting with the President of the United States is very substantive, and I thank everyone who is helping. This can truly bring the war closer to an end – it is the United States that can wield this kind of global influence, and we are doing everything to ensure that others around the world stand on our side in this effort.

We have already prepared our part of the homework ahead of the meeting with President Trump – both the military component and the economic one. Every detail is ready. The agenda of our meeting with the President of the United States is very substantive, and I thank everyone who is helping. This can truly bring the war closer to an end – it is the United States that can wield this kind of global influence, and we are doing everything to ensure that others around the world stand on our side in this effort.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

331,096 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

- Why not invite Zelensky to this summit? Whose decision is it not to invite him? Was it the president's decision or President Putin's? - This meeting happened because the President of Russia, through special envoy Steve Whitkoff, asked the President of the United States for a meeting. As you all know, Whitkoff traveled to Russia to have a conversation with Putin at his request. And the president agrees to this meeting at President Putin's request. The purpose of this meeting for the president is to gain a better understanding of how we can end this war. And I think for the US president, a face-to-face meeting in the same room with the President of Russia, rather than a phone call, will give Trump the best understanding of how to end this war and where everything is headed. - SK

- Why not invite Zelensky to this summit? Whose decision is it not to invite him? Was it the president's decision or President Putin's? - This meeting happened because the President of Russia, through special envoy Steve Whitkoff, asked the President of the United States for a meeting. As you all know, Whitkoff traveled to Russia to have a conversation with Putin at his request. And the president agrees to this meeting at President Putin's request. The purpose of this meeting for the president is to gain a better understanding of how we can end this war. And I think for the US president, a face-to-face meeting in the same room with the President of Russia, rather than a phone call, will give Trump the best understanding of how to end this war and where everything is headed. - SK

Zlatti71

39,798 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🛑🇧🇫- Burkina Faso’s PM on how how our gold was being looted. This is what Jean Emmanuel Ouédraogo was saying on national television about our artisanal gold: “Imagine, we were getting less than 500kg of gold. And last year (with SONASP), we almost got 10 tons. However, this year by the month of September alone, it was already 36 tons. In the past, Burkina Faso had no gold reserves at all. They were coming, they were the ones who go down in the mines, no Burkinabè was there. They were the ones who will come out and say, “Ah, this is what we got! And we only had to nod and accept it.” Once it leaves the mines, it goes directly to the airport where a plane ✈️ is waiting for it, and when it’s finally loaded, it takes off and that was it. Nothing stays in the country. Is this acceptable? This is unacceptable! But it’s over now! Even in the big mines they still have, we have our people there to control them, so that everything can be clear, so that if they say this is the amount of tons that we brought out, at least we are all witnesses of it.” - End of quote. I, Marcus or any Burkinabè who is well aware can attest to this. I was living in Kombissiri in the year 2010-2011, and frequently, I could hear the bikers escorting the gold in full speed like a presidential escort heading to Ouagadougou which is just at about 40km from Kombissiri. At first, I didn’t know it was gold being transported. Until one day, I asked the neighbors and the police and they told me it was gold going to the airport. I was like damn! People are looting our gold! I don’t remember the name of the mine they told me, but Kombissiri was the route they were following. So, this confirms what the PM is saying. But thank God for Capitaine Ibrahim TRAORÉ ! We have none of that shit anymore.

🛑🇧🇫- Burkina Faso’s PM on how how our gold was being looted. This is what Jean Emmanuel Ouédraogo was saying on national television about our artisanal gold: “Imagine, we were getting less than 500kg of gold. And last year (with SONASP), we almost got 10 tons. However, this year by the month of September alone, it was already 36 tons. In the past, Burkina Faso had no gold reserves at all. They were coming, they were the ones who go down in the mines, no Burkinabè was there. They were the ones who will come out and say, “Ah, this is what we got! And we only had to nod and accept it.” Once it leaves the mines, it goes directly to the airport where a plane ✈️ is waiting for it, and when it’s finally loaded, it takes off and that was it. Nothing stays in the country. Is this acceptable? This is unacceptable! But it’s over now! Even in the big mines they still have, we have our people there to control them, so that everything can be clear, so that if they say this is the amount of tons that we brought out, at least we are all witnesses of it.” - End of quote. I, Marcus or any Burkinabè who is well aware can attest to this. I was living in Kombissiri in the year 2010-2011, and frequently, I could hear the bikers escorting the gold in full speed like a presidential escort heading to Ouagadougou which is just at about 40km from Kombissiri. At first, I didn’t know it was gold being transported. Until one day, I asked the neighbors and the police and they told me it was gold going to the airport. I was like damn! People are looting our gold! I don’t remember the name of the mine they told me, but Kombissiri was the route they were following. So, this confirms what the PM is saying. But thank God for Capitaine Ibrahim TRAORÉ ! We have none of that shit anymore.

Sy Marcus Herve Traore

15,468 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Robert F. Kennedy on a landslide victory🔥: "The press won't do these polls... ...but we do them all the time." "When I run against President Biden head-to-head—just me against President Biden—I beat him in a landslide." "And when I run against President Trump, just me against President Trump head to head, I beat him. And President Biden can't beat him." "So then why am I behind? The reason I'm behind in the voting polls, the conventional voting polls, is because so many Americans are voting out of fear." "I have yet to talk to anybody outside of my family who says we're voting for President Biden because he's energetic and because he's got the cognitive capacity to outsmart everybody in the world, and he's going to give us a new vision for America. They never say that, except again, some of my family members do believe that. What they say to you really normally is, "You've got to vote for him or Trump's going to get in there and destroy the Republic." All of the messaging from President Biden—the New York Times reported—President Biden is going to have $3 billion to spend on this campaign. But he's not using that money to amplify his voice, to talk about his record, to talk about his plans for the future, to talk about his vision, his promise for our country and the American people. He's not using it to talk about how he can solve the debt problem, how he can solve the chronic disease issue, how he can wind down the forever wars. You'll never hear that from this campaign. The only thing they—their only strategy—is to try to keep me off the ballot and then to make everybody terrified of Donald Trump. On the other side, they do the same thing. They're saying you have to vote for Donald Trump, or President Biden is going to get in and it's going to be the end of the Republic. So, my challenge, and this is what I tell the press when they say, "What is your path to victory?" I say, "My path to victory is to convince Americans not to vote out of fear. If I can persuade the American public to vote out of hope, to vote out of a faith in their future, to vote for a vision for this country that they can be proud of, that they can believe in, that they can feel like their children are going to be safe, their children are going to have lives, their children are going to get into homes, if I can convince them of that, then I win the election." Easily. Oh, Franklin Roosevelt, who was one of the greatest figures in the Democratic Party history, in 1932 he said to the American people, "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." And the reason he said that is because he saw what was happening in Europe at that time. The Great Depression had leveled the United States' economy; it was staggering. And he saw the rise of demagogues all over the world, and they were using fear to get people—citizens of those democracies—to abandon their values and to vote to give up their rights and to vote for somebody that they otherwise didn't want to vote for. He saw the power of fear and how damaging it was for democracy. And that's something we need to remember today. And when somebody is telling you to vote out of fear, they are trying to manipulate you into abandoning your values. Are any of you going to vote out of fear during this upcoming election?" 🔥

Robert F. Kennedy on a landslide victory🔥: "The press won't do these polls... ...but we do them all the time." "When I run against President Biden head-to-head—just me against President Biden—I beat him in a landslide." "And when I run against President Trump, just me against President Trump head to head, I beat him. And President Biden can't beat him." "So then why am I behind? The reason I'm behind in the voting polls, the conventional voting polls, is because so many Americans are voting out of fear." "I have yet to talk to anybody outside of my family who says we're voting for President Biden because he's energetic and because he's got the cognitive capacity to outsmart everybody in the world, and he's going to give us a new vision for America. They never say that, except again, some of my family members do believe that. What they say to you really normally is, "You've got to vote for him or Trump's going to get in there and destroy the Republic." All of the messaging from President Biden—the New York Times reported—President Biden is going to have $3 billion to spend on this campaign. But he's not using that money to amplify his voice, to talk about his record, to talk about his plans for the future, to talk about his vision, his promise for our country and the American people. He's not using it to talk about how he can solve the debt problem, how he can solve the chronic disease issue, how he can wind down the forever wars. You'll never hear that from this campaign. The only thing they—their only strategy—is to try to keep me off the ballot and then to make everybody terrified of Donald Trump. On the other side, they do the same thing. They're saying you have to vote for Donald Trump, or President Biden is going to get in and it's going to be the end of the Republic. So, my challenge, and this is what I tell the press when they say, "What is your path to victory?" I say, "My path to victory is to convince Americans not to vote out of fear. If I can persuade the American public to vote out of hope, to vote out of a faith in their future, to vote for a vision for this country that they can be proud of, that they can believe in, that they can feel like their children are going to be safe, their children are going to have lives, their children are going to get into homes, if I can convince them of that, then I win the election." Easily. Oh, Franklin Roosevelt, who was one of the greatest figures in the Democratic Party history, in 1932 he said to the American people, "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." And the reason he said that is because he saw what was happening in Europe at that time. The Great Depression had leveled the United States' economy; it was staggering. And he saw the rise of demagogues all over the world, and they were using fear to get people—citizens of those democracies—to abandon their values and to vote to give up their rights and to vote for somebody that they otherwise didn't want to vote for. He saw the power of fear and how damaging it was for democracy. And that's something we need to remember today. And when somebody is telling you to vote out of fear, they are trying to manipulate you into abandoning your values. Are any of you going to vote out of fear during this upcoming election?" 🔥

Jonny Paradise

207,091 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Dear great people of a great country, I am immensely proud of each of you. I admire each one of you. I believe in each one of you. Any normal person wants the war to end. But none of us will allow Ukraine to end. That is why when it comes to ending the war, we always add: on our terms. That is why, along with the word peace, there is always another word: just. That is why, in the future, the word independent will always appear alongside the word Ukraine. This is what we fight for. And we will prevail. On the greatest day of our lives. I thank all of our soldiers, our people, and everyone around the world who stands with us and the truth. Glory to Ukraine!

Dear great people of a great country, I am immensely proud of each of you. I admire each one of you. I believe in each one of you. Any normal person wants the war to end. But none of us will allow Ukraine to end. That is why when it comes to ending the war, we always add: on our terms. That is why, along with the word peace, there is always another word: just. That is why, in the future, the word independent will always appear alongside the word Ukraine. This is what we fight for. And we will prevail. On the greatest day of our lives. I thank all of our soldiers, our people, and everyone around the world who stands with us and the truth. Glory to Ukraine!

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

2,615,164 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

VIDEO Democratic Front (DF) president Mathias Mpuuga on #TheGrindPodcast with Patrick Kamara 933 KFM: 1. "...I am an active politician, I have moved in every inch and space of this country. I know where his [General Yoweri Museveni support is, it is not 71% it is not even 50%, and he knows it too." 2. "I am on record before and after the elections for having spoken out. I went out of my way and wrote to every political party in the opposition, warning and inviting them for a commonality of purpose...Immediately after the elections, I held a press conference spoke about the same issues, I had warned colleagues about that we never cared about and they happened. So, I feel that I am vindicated to the fact that I raised the alarm. Those who didn’t care, there is no much I could do to drag them." 3. "Also I could have raised the challenge about that election in the supreme court, but I was not a presidential candidate and I did not have permission to raise the same on behalf of any candidate. Remember that in one of the amendments that I had intended in the presidential elections act probably out of ignorance or excitement, was to amend the law to the fact that a citizen can challenge the election in a supreme court as long as that citizen is a voter and there is a proof that his challenge is not a waste of court’s time. I had intended that when that happens when presidential candidates are either compromised or timid, a courageous citizen can challenge that election. That didn’t happen, and the opportunity was lost." 4. "What have I done as DF? The DF is is going to challenge particular actions leading to that election and our petition to the Constitutional court is ready, if you want to know how we have moved and that we are not sleeping as the DF." #RealChangeActNow

VIDEO Democratic Front (DF) president Mathias Mpuuga on #TheGrindPodcast with Patrick Kamara 933 KFM: 1. "...I am an active politician, I have moved in every inch and space of this country. I know where his [General Yoweri Museveni support is, it is not 71% it is not even 50%, and he knows it too." 2. "I am on record before and after the elections for having spoken out. I went out of my way and wrote to every political party in the opposition, warning and inviting them for a commonality of purpose...Immediately after the elections, I held a press conference spoke about the same issues, I had warned colleagues about that we never cared about and they happened. So, I feel that I am vindicated to the fact that I raised the alarm. Those who didn’t care, there is no much I could do to drag them." 3. "Also I could have raised the challenge about that election in the supreme court, but I was not a presidential candidate and I did not have permission to raise the same on behalf of any candidate. Remember that in one of the amendments that I had intended in the presidential elections act probably out of ignorance or excitement, was to amend the law to the fact that a citizen can challenge the election in a supreme court as long as that citizen is a voter and there is a proof that his challenge is not a waste of court’s time. I had intended that when that happens when presidential candidates are either compromised or timid, a courageous citizen can challenge that election. That didn’t happen, and the opportunity was lost." 4. "What have I done as DF? The DF is is going to challenge particular actions leading to that election and our petition to the Constitutional court is ready, if you want to know how we have moved and that we are not sleeping as the DF." #RealChangeActNow

Democratic Front (DF)

20,810 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

.Jason Rantz on Seattle Red calmly points out what was missing from the coverage of DNI Tulsi Gabbard's Senate testimony and masterfully explains the Trump administration's rationale for after Iran... "We're in a world of fact. I think Andrew McCabe's characterization of her answer goes very far from what she actually said. The question of whether or not something is imminent to the point where you're going to order military strikes is separate, and is the decision -- the sole decision maker there is the President. It's based on the intelligence that they're getting. And Tulsi Gabbard's point was we present the probabilities of what is a potential threat, and the President gets to decide with counsel whether or not he believes that it qualifies as imminent. To the point of what imminent means, it's not the same as what we all use this term. It started with the Bush doctrine. It expanded greatly under Obama, and they're basically arguing three main points, I think, for what imminent threat actually can be in this role: whether or not you have a window of opportunity -- and they had, obviously, a window of opportunity in this case, most of the people in Iran are no longer alive, the ability to go after someone who is in fact, or an organization or regime is a potential threat. Do they have the capabilities to threaten us? And the argument from the beginning wasn't solely about tomorrow, they can have nuclear capabilities. It was whether or not they were going to have the ballistic missile coverage to ensure that they can, in fact, cover their nuclear capability."

.Jason Rantz on Seattle Red calmly points out what was missing from the coverage of DNI Tulsi Gabbard's Senate testimony and masterfully explains the Trump administration's rationale for after Iran... "We're in a world of fact. I think Andrew McCabe's characterization of her answer goes very far from what she actually said. The question of whether or not something is imminent to the point where you're going to order military strikes is separate, and is the decision -- the sole decision maker there is the President. It's based on the intelligence that they're getting. And Tulsi Gabbard's point was we present the probabilities of what is a potential threat, and the President gets to decide with counsel whether or not he believes that it qualifies as imminent. To the point of what imminent means, it's not the same as what we all use this term. It started with the Bush doctrine. It expanded greatly under Obama, and they're basically arguing three main points, I think, for what imminent threat actually can be in this role: whether or not you have a window of opportunity -- and they had, obviously, a window of opportunity in this case, most of the people in Iran are no longer alive, the ability to go after someone who is in fact, or an organization or regime is a potential threat. Do they have the capabilities to threaten us? And the argument from the beginning wasn't solely about tomorrow, they can have nuclear capabilities. It was whether or not they were going to have the ballistic missile coverage to ensure that they can, in fact, cover their nuclear capability."

Curtis Houck

16,657 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Umm… excuse me? Ben-Gvir, Israel’s Minister of National Security (key member of Netanyahu’s coalition) says President Trump is NOT ALLOWED to make a deal with Iran He was asked about a potential “bad agreement” with Iran “like the one that Trump” [might negotiate]. He responded: “A bad agreement for the State of Israel can harm human life… I know that Prime Minister Netanyahu and all of us as members of the cabinet… as the government of Israel cannot allow this to happen… This is an agreement that can harm the state of Israel, and we will not allow this to happen.” Who the hell does he think he is?

Umm… excuse me? Ben-Gvir, Israel’s Minister of National Security (key member of Netanyahu’s coalition) says President Trump is NOT ALLOWED to make a deal with Iran He was asked about a potential “bad agreement” with Iran “like the one that Trump” [might negotiate]. He responded: “A bad agreement for the State of Israel can harm human life… I know that Prime Minister Netanyahu and all of us as members of the cabinet… as the government of Israel cannot allow this to happen… This is an agreement that can harm the state of Israel, and we will not allow this to happen.” Who the hell does he think he is?

MJTruthUltra

182,846 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

INSECURITY: LET'S TELL PRESIDENT TINUBU THE TRUTH, NOT COMMENDATION Today, the Senate had an elaborate discussion on the security situation in the country, which has worsened in the last few weeks. When the Senate President recognised me to speak, I started by reminding him how I raised this issue with him a couple of days ago, and the need for us to work together. I added that it was good the matter had come up by way of a motion. I felt that the deterioration of the security situation in most communities, the killings and abductions, and even the killing of soldiers and officers — one of them of the rank of Brigadier General — and the way terrorists are abducting students, with bandits attacking several States at the same time, are situations that even nations at war do not experience. Therefore, the matter should be examined with all the seriousness it deserves. I stated that it is very clear that not only our democracy is under threat, but the nation itself is being reduced, belittled, and threatened. I also disagreed with the approach and tone of the motion, and some of the comments from members of the majority party who, in my view, were unnecessarily political. That, in my view, did not match the seriousness of the issue. At this point, the Senate President did not allow me to conclude my comments. But what I was saying was that, yes, as I have said several times, the entire nation is under attack, and we must all unite to address this challenge. I do not agree with the request in the motion, supported by the majority of speakers from the majority party, that the President and the government should be commended. I disagree with it.

INSECURITY: LET'S TELL PRESIDENT TINUBU THE TRUTH, NOT COMMENDATION Today, the Senate had an elaborate discussion on the security situation in the country, which has worsened in the last few weeks. When the Senate President recognised me to speak, I started by reminding him how I raised this issue with him a couple of days ago, and the need for us to work together. I added that it was good the matter had come up by way of a motion. I felt that the deterioration of the security situation in most communities, the killings and abductions, and even the killing of soldiers and officers — one of them of the rank of Brigadier General — and the way terrorists are abducting students, with bandits attacking several States at the same time, are situations that even nations at war do not experience. Therefore, the matter should be examined with all the seriousness it deserves. I stated that it is very clear that not only our democracy is under threat, but the nation itself is being reduced, belittled, and threatened. I also disagreed with the approach and tone of the motion, and some of the comments from members of the majority party who, in my view, were unnecessarily political. That, in my view, did not match the seriousness of the issue. At this point, the Senate President did not allow me to conclude my comments. But what I was saying was that, yes, as I have said several times, the entire nation is under attack, and we must all unite to address this challenge. I do not agree with the request in the motion, supported by the majority of speakers from the majority party, that the President and the government should be commended. I disagree with it.

Henry Seriake Dickson

84,585 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Tammy Bruce: "The work of the President of the United States -- thank god for him -- is going to make sure that this is not a lost opportunity. We can say this simply by having watched him most of his adult life in some capacity, but certainly with what he's given up and sacrificed to be the leader of this country ... I know to trust him. I know to not second guess him ... I'm grateful that he's the one making the decisions."

Tammy Bruce: "The work of the President of the United States -- thank god for him -- is going to make sure that this is not a lost opportunity. We can say this simply by having watched him most of his adult life in some capacity, but certainly with what he's given up and sacrificed to be the leader of this country ... I know to trust him. I know to not second guess him ... I'm grateful that he's the one making the decisions."

Aaron Rupar

305,771 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Kendrick Lamar reveals what Not Like Us means to him in a new Harper's BAZAAR interview📍 SZA asks: Can I ask you a hypermasculine question? You can also tell me to shut the f*ck up. What does “Not Like Us” mean to you? KL: 😂 Not like us? Not like us is the energy of who I am, the type of man I represent. Now, if you identify with the man that I represent … SZA: Break the man down for me. KL: This man has morals, he has values, he believes in something, he stands on something. He’s not pandering... He’s a man who can recognize his mistakes and not be afraid to share the mistakes and can dig deep down into fear-based ideologies or experiences to be able to express them without feeling like he’s less of a man... If I’m thinking of “Not Like Us,” I’m thinking of me and whoever identifies with that.

Kendrick Lamar reveals what Not Like Us means to him in a new Harper's BAZAAR interview📍 SZA asks: Can I ask you a hypermasculine question? You can also tell me to shut the f*ck up. What does “Not Like Us” mean to you? KL: 😂 Not like us? Not like us is the energy of who I am, the type of man I represent. Now, if you identify with the man that I represent … SZA: Break the man down for me. KL: This man has morals, he has values, he believes in something, he stands on something. He’s not pandering... He’s a man who can recognize his mistakes and not be afraid to share the mistakes and can dig deep down into fear-based ideologies or experiences to be able to express them without feeling like he’s less of a man... If I’m thinking of “Not Like Us,” I’m thinking of me and whoever identifies with that.

Victor Baez | Club Ambition

340,686 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

CNN’s David Axelrod: “We can go one of two ways in this country. We can, embrace this notion that somehow we're at war and where there'll be more killing and more violence. Or we can learn from this moment. I — you mentioned history. I was a kid when, we went through a period of assassination in the 1960s. I remember when Martin Luther king was killed. Robert Kennedy went onto the streets of Indianapolis. He was a candidate for president at that time and it was very, very dangerous, frankly, for him to be out there. But he insisted on going, and he spoke to the crowd and he finished and I wanted to share this. He finished with a poem by Aeschylus, the ancient Greek poet. And it was, “even in our sleep pain which cannot forget falls drop by, drop upon the heart, until in our own despair, against our will comes wisdom through the awful grace of God.” The question is, have we seen enough to embrace wisdom here and recognize that this is not a path that we want to go as a country? And let's be clear, I heard what those folks said. We've had political assassinations of Democrats and Republicans of the left and the right. This is not something that is exclusive to one or the other, but I will say, if we continue to embrace this notion that if we disagree that we're not only political opponents, but you are an enemy, you are an evil. You want to destroy the country. You want to destroy our way of life. That is a prescription for disaster.”

CNN’s David Axelrod: “We can go one of two ways in this country. We can, embrace this notion that somehow we're at war and where there'll be more killing and more violence. Or we can learn from this moment. I — you mentioned history. I was a kid when, we went through a period of assassination in the 1960s. I remember when Martin Luther king was killed. Robert Kennedy went onto the streets of Indianapolis. He was a candidate for president at that time and it was very, very dangerous, frankly, for him to be out there. But he insisted on going, and he spoke to the crowd and he finished and I wanted to share this. He finished with a poem by Aeschylus, the ancient Greek poet. And it was, “even in our sleep pain which cannot forget falls drop by, drop upon the heart, until in our own despair, against our will comes wisdom through the awful grace of God.” The question is, have we seen enough to embrace wisdom here and recognize that this is not a path that we want to go as a country? And let's be clear, I heard what those folks said. We've had political assassinations of Democrats and Republicans of the left and the right. This is not something that is exclusive to one or the other, but I will say, if we continue to embrace this notion that if we disagree that we're not only political opponents, but you are an enemy, you are an evil. You want to destroy the country. You want to destroy our way of life. That is a prescription for disaster.”

Curtis Houck

1,431,597 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

“We will not submit to noise, rascality, or disobedience to lawful court orders. We must uphold democracy, respect the judiciary whether it favours us or not, and remain faithful to the principles that hold our nation together. There is no path to national greatness except the path of building one country, one common vision, one shared future of progress and prosperity for all Nigerians. That is what Renewed Hope is about. They cannot scare me off. I have been through this road before and, if I must walk it again and again for our country, I will. There is no better place than Nigeria, and no one will build it for us except ourselves. I have listened. I know the journey is not easy. But I give you my word: I will not run away from this task. I will not give up. Coordinate from the ward level, act as one family, stay focused on what we promised Nigerians, and stand firm.” This was my message to the leadership and coordinators of my Renewed Hope Ambassadors this afternoon. God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The work continues. Bola Ahmed Tinubu President

“We will not submit to noise, rascality, or disobedience to lawful court orders. We must uphold democracy, respect the judiciary whether it favours us or not, and remain faithful to the principles that hold our nation together. There is no path to national greatness except the path of building one country, one common vision, one shared future of progress and prosperity for all Nigerians. That is what Renewed Hope is about. They cannot scare me off. I have been through this road before and, if I must walk it again and again for our country, I will. There is no better place than Nigeria, and no one will build it for us except ourselves. I have listened. I know the journey is not easy. But I give you my word: I will not run away from this task. I will not give up. Coordinate from the ward level, act as one family, stay focused on what we promised Nigerians, and stand firm.” This was my message to the leadership and coordinators of my Renewed Hope Ambassadors this afternoon. God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The work continues. Bola Ahmed Tinubu President

Bola Ahmed Tinubu

718,317 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Iran's Ghalibaf: Not only did I not volunteer to join the negotiating team, but I was actually reluctant to do so. Before accepting responsibility for the negotiations, I did everything I could to avoid having this responsibility assigned to me. One of the reasons I did not want to accept this responsibility was that Donald Trump was the planner, commander, and overseer of the assassination of Qasem Soleimani. General Soleimani was dear to the entire Islamic world, but he was certainly different for me on a personal level. Do you think it is easy for me to sit down and finalize a text with such a person? However, when I saw that none of the officials proposed anyone else, and that my own suggestions were not accepted, I had to carry out the duty that had been assigned to me. We are not meant to do only what we like; rather, we must do what our duty requires of us.

Iran's Ghalibaf: Not only did I not volunteer to join the negotiating team, but I was actually reluctant to do so. Before accepting responsibility for the negotiations, I did everything I could to avoid having this responsibility assigned to me. One of the reasons I did not want to accept this responsibility was that Donald Trump was the planner, commander, and overseer of the assassination of Qasem Soleimani. General Soleimani was dear to the entire Islamic world, but he was certainly different for me on a personal level. Do you think it is easy for me to sit down and finalize a text with such a person? However, when I saw that none of the officials proposed anyone else, and that my own suggestions were not accepted, I had to carry out the duty that had been assigned to me. We are not meant to do only what we like; rather, we must do what our duty requires of us.

Clash Report

69,023 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

Honored to hear the news that I have been conferred with an OON (Officer of the Order of Nigeria) by The Federal Government of Nigeria. I am grateful for this recognition and honour. It has always been my mission to use my platform to showcase our country - the passion, the resilience, the joy the culture and of course the struggles of our people. I do not take any of this for granted. We have one Nigeria and we will continue to do whatever we must to make it better! Thank you all for being on this journey with me. So help us God. 001 - OON.

Honored to hear the news that I have been conferred with an OON (Officer of the Order of Nigeria) by The Federal Government of Nigeria. I am grateful for this recognition and honour. It has always been my mission to use my platform to showcase our country - the passion, the resilience, the joy the culture and of course the struggles of our people. I do not take any of this for granted. We have one Nigeria and we will continue to do whatever we must to make it better! Thank you all for being on this journey with me. So help us God. 001 - OON.

Davido

1,219,362 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren