正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

The plot thickens...🤔 Rainmaker confirmed it flew a 20-minute cloud seeding mission on July 2 over Karnes County, located southeast of the Texas flood zone. 🔗👇 TEXAS CLOUD SEEDING CEO FUNDED BY PETER THIEL, CONNECTED TO PALANTIR Meet AUGUSTUS DORICKO, a 25-YEAR-OLD TECH BRO and THIEL FELLOW, who founded...

SlavFreeSpirit's profile picture

SlavicFreeSpirit

34,415 subscribers

47,505 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生科学技术新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

💥 WOW. Fox News just did an entire segment on Cloud Seeding and weather modification, going as far as to acknowledge the fact that it was occurring around the time of the Texas floods. Now. The black pillers will say that the CEO of Rainmaker Tech denied any effects from their actions. But they would be missing the broader point. The “Conspiracy” of weather modification has now gone mainstream. It’s no longer a conspiracy and segments like this allow the public to digest reality and eventually advance towards truth. Parallel 8 Media
2:32

💥 WOW. Fox News just did an entire segment on Cloud Seeding and weather modification, going as far as to acknowledge the fact that it was occurring around the time of the Texas floods. Now. The black pillers will say that the CEO of Rainmaker Tech denied any effects from their actions. But they would be missing the broader point. The “Conspiracy” of weather modification has now gone mainstream. It’s no longer a conspiracy and segments like this allow the public to digest reality and eventually advance towards truth. Parallel 8 Media

NewsTreason Channel 17

420,612 次观看 • 1 年前

WOAH 🚨 What amazing ‘coincidences’ - The Kerrville City Council just approved a $175 million dollar power plant project RIGHT WHERE THE FLOODING IS HAPPENING in Texas - Texas Cloud Seeding Weather Modification Programs ARE IN THE SAME AREA - The flooding was so bad, The Guadalupe River that flooded during the storm “rose 42 feet in just 1-3 hours, unimaginable water flow,” this is very indicative of cloud seeing disasters “Wouldn't it be crazy if the map of rain enhancement projects in Texas seems pretty heavy loaded on the area which had flooding?” …. It was and he provides the maps to prove it I mean what are the odds???? Land Grab
0:59

WOAH 🚨 What amazing ‘coincidences’ - The Kerrville City Council just approved a $175 million dollar power plant project RIGHT WHERE THE FLOODING IS HAPPENING in Texas - Texas Cloud Seeding Weather Modification Programs ARE IN THE SAME AREA - The flooding was so bad, The Guadalupe River that flooded during the storm “rose 42 feet in just 1-3 hours, unimaginable water flow,” this is very indicative of cloud seeing disasters “Wouldn't it be crazy if the map of rain enhancement projects in Texas seems pretty heavy loaded on the area which had flooding?” …. It was and he provides the maps to prove it I mean what are the odds???? Land Grab

Wall Street Apes

655,856 次观看 • 1 年前

delivered a fiery close to the episode with an impassioned condemnation of weather modification, calling it “immoral” and demanding it be banned outright. She laid out claims of cloud seeding gone wrong in Texas, highlighted corporate denials, and even pointed to Peter Thiel’s investment in Rainmaker Technologies. Her final remarks were packed with evidence, including NOAA forms, radar loops, CEO statements, and historical flood comparisons. She didn’t hesitate to name names, drawing attention to unregulated private experiments funded by billionaire money. “The only way to put these conspiracy theories to rest,” she stressed, “is to ban weather manipulation in its entirety.” It was a forceful call for criminal penalties and total transparency, bringing the episode’s themes of elite corruption, media dishonesty, and bureaucratic failure to an unforgettable close.
10:49

delivered a fiery close to the episode with an impassioned condemnation of weather modification, calling it “immoral” and demanding it be banned outright. She laid out claims of cloud seeding gone wrong in Texas, highlighted corporate denials, and even pointed to Peter Thiel’s investment in Rainmaker Technologies. Her final remarks were packed with evidence, including NOAA forms, radar loops, CEO statements, and historical flood comparisons. She didn’t hesitate to name names, drawing attention to unregulated private experiments funded by billionaire money. “The only way to put these conspiracy theories to rest,” she stressed, “is to ban weather manipulation in its entirety.” It was a forceful call for criminal penalties and total transparency, bringing the episode’s themes of elite corruption, media dishonesty, and bureaucratic failure to an unforgettable close.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

102,647 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 HOLY SH*T! RAINMAKER CEO ADMITS WEATHER CONTROL - HIS TARGETS GET HIT WITH RAIN AND ICE RIGHT ON SCHEDULE ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION YET? This is Augustus Doricko, CEO of Rainmaker, explaining weather modification on camera with Shawn Ryan, as the timeline snaps perfectly into place. Doricko lays out the system in plain English: “You find the water with the radar… you fly your drone up into these conditions… you disperse the material… and with the same radar, you can now see it freezing, growing into bigger snowflakes… and measure how much precipitates downwind.” “For every pound of this that you put up, you get in excess of 40 million pounds down on the ground.” That’s not modeling. That’s control. He confirms the footprint: “We’re operating in Utah, Colorado, Oregon, California - and Texas… we’ve been in our own rain there.” Then Shawn Ryan says the line that changed everything: “It’s got to be a weird feeling… knowing that that’s your rain.” Doricko’s response? “Like I said, that’s the second most important thing that I’ve ever done in my life.” Now lock the timeline. Doricko said a new agent - more effective than silver iodide - would be introduced in January 2026. Guess when the ice storm hit Texas? January. 2026. Not later. Not “sometime in the future.” Right on schedule. And remember what Doricko already admitted: • Snow is easier to make than rain • The current agent mimics ice crystal structure • Texas was already an active operating area So the question isn’t if the tech exists. He explained it. On camera. The question is: why did the same regions swing from flooding… to ice… exactly when he said the next phase would begin? And don’t ignore who’s backing him. Doricko is a Thiel Fellow, funded by Peter Thiel, with capital and influence running through Palantir - built for prediction, modeling, and control at scale. Radar guided drones. Chemical dispersal agents. Real time precipitation tracking. Floods first. Ice next. January 2026 - right on time. If this isn’t weather manipulation, what is it?
2:59

🚨 HOLY SH*T! RAINMAKER CEO ADMITS WEATHER CONTROL - HIS TARGETS GET HIT WITH RAIN AND ICE RIGHT ON SCHEDULE ARE YOU PAYING ATTENTION YET? This is Augustus Doricko, CEO of Rainmaker, explaining weather modification on camera with Shawn Ryan, as the timeline snaps perfectly into place. Doricko lays out the system in plain English: “You find the water with the radar… you fly your drone up into these conditions… you disperse the material… and with the same radar, you can now see it freezing, growing into bigger snowflakes… and measure how much precipitates downwind.” “For every pound of this that you put up, you get in excess of 40 million pounds down on the ground.” That’s not modeling. That’s control. He confirms the footprint: “We’re operating in Utah, Colorado, Oregon, California - and Texas… we’ve been in our own rain there.” Then Shawn Ryan says the line that changed everything: “It’s got to be a weird feeling… knowing that that’s your rain.” Doricko’s response? “Like I said, that’s the second most important thing that I’ve ever done in my life.” Now lock the timeline. Doricko said a new agent - more effective than silver iodide - would be introduced in January 2026. Guess when the ice storm hit Texas? January. 2026. Not later. Not “sometime in the future.” Right on schedule. And remember what Doricko already admitted: • Snow is easier to make than rain • The current agent mimics ice crystal structure • Texas was already an active operating area So the question isn’t if the tech exists. He explained it. On camera. The question is: why did the same regions swing from flooding… to ice… exactly when he said the next phase would begin? And don’t ignore who’s backing him. Doricko is a Thiel Fellow, funded by Peter Thiel, with capital and influence running through Palantir - built for prediction, modeling, and control at scale. Radar guided drones. Chemical dispersal agents. Real time precipitation tracking. Floods first. Ice next. January 2026 - right on time. If this isn’t weather manipulation, what is it?

HustleBitch

440,166 次观看 • 6 个月前

There’s a secret society of the most powerful people on earth. it just leaked. it’s called Dialog. founded by Peter Thiel in 2006. secret for 20 years. 220+ members. reportedly including: a NATO commander Senator Ted Cruz military leaders tech executives and celebrities the leaked discussion topics: AI disruption World War 3 scenarios cult-building billionaire matchmaking now here’s why it matters: Peter Thiel co-founded Palantir surveillance and military AI his fund was SpaceX’s first investor. he just invested in Anthropic. he was the first outside investor in Facebook. one man. connected to almost every company shaping YOUR future and he gives lectures about the Antichrist while funding the AI that could end the world… the companies building your future aren’t random. a handful of people are connected to all of them. and they meet in rooms you’ll never be in pay attention to who keeps showing up that’s how power actually works
2:58

There’s a secret society of the most powerful people on earth. it just leaked. it’s called Dialog. founded by Peter Thiel in 2006. secret for 20 years. 220+ members. reportedly including: a NATO commander Senator Ted Cruz military leaders tech executives and celebrities the leaked discussion topics: AI disruption World War 3 scenarios cult-building billionaire matchmaking now here’s why it matters: Peter Thiel co-founded Palantir surveillance and military AI his fund was SpaceX’s first investor. he just invested in Anthropic. he was the first outside investor in Facebook. one man. connected to almost every company shaping YOUR future and he gives lectures about the Antichrist while funding the AI that could end the world… the companies building your future aren’t random. a handful of people are connected to all of them. and they meet in rooms you’ll never be in pay attention to who keeps showing up that’s how power actually works

Mika D Luffy 🐂 🏴‍☠️

21,614 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 TEXAS FLOODS AFTER “BLUE RAIN” - 7 STATE-RUN CLOUD SEEDING PROGRAMS EXPOSED Historic flooding. Entire towns underwater. At least 24 dead with many more missing including children. ⚠️ And just months ago? Texans reported BLUE RAIN falling from the sky. Now here's what they're hiding: ⚠️ Texas is running 7 massive cloud seeding programs: all state-authorized under the Weather Modification Act of 1967. Planes. Chemicals. Skies sprayed to "enhance rainfall" across millions of acres These aren’t rumors. They’re licensed weather manipulation ops spanning millions of acres. They say it’s to “enhance rainfall.” But now? Entire towns are underwater. Coincidence? Or did they push the clouds too far and trigger this flood? Modified clouds. Engineered storms. Blue rain. This isn’t just bad weather. It looks a hell of a lot like weather warfare. Source: Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation, TDLR, Weather Modification Annual Report
0:29

🚨 TEXAS FLOODS AFTER “BLUE RAIN” - 7 STATE-RUN CLOUD SEEDING PROGRAMS EXPOSED Historic flooding. Entire towns underwater. At least 24 dead with many more missing including children. ⚠️ And just months ago? Texans reported BLUE RAIN falling from the sky. Now here's what they're hiding: ⚠️ Texas is running 7 massive cloud seeding programs: all state-authorized under the Weather Modification Act of 1967. Planes. Chemicals. Skies sprayed to "enhance rainfall" across millions of acres These aren’t rumors. They’re licensed weather manipulation ops spanning millions of acres. They say it’s to “enhance rainfall.” But now? Entire towns are underwater. Coincidence? Or did they push the clouds too far and trigger this flood? Modified clouds. Engineered storms. Blue rain. This isn’t just bad weather. It looks a hell of a lot like weather warfare. Source: Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation, TDLR, Weather Modification Annual Report

HustleBitch

2,936,525 次观看 • 1 年前

🌩️WEATHER MODIFICATION CAN LEAD TO DISASTER Case in point: April 2024, Dubai A city known for its desert climate, was devastated by record shattering floods. Over a year’s worth of rain fell in just 24 hours, leading to multiple deaths, crippling infrastructure, flooding highways, and causing widespread disruption. ☁️ The UAE has an active cloud seeding program, one of the most aggressive in the world. 🛩️ Flights were confirmed by the National Center of Meteorology shortly before the storm. 🌧️ Cloud seeding is known to intensify rainfall by up to 40% in some cases. Weather modification isn't science fiction, it's real, and it's happening. Ignoring its potential role in events like the Texas floods is not just naive, it's irresponsible. So we have to ask: Is the juice worth the squeeze? Florida doesn’t think so, the state has banned weather modification altogether. It’s time for a nationwide public debate. The stakes are too high to leave this in the shadows.
0:49

🌩️WEATHER MODIFICATION CAN LEAD TO DISASTER Case in point: April 2024, Dubai A city known for its desert climate, was devastated by record shattering floods. Over a year’s worth of rain fell in just 24 hours, leading to multiple deaths, crippling infrastructure, flooding highways, and causing widespread disruption. ☁️ The UAE has an active cloud seeding program, one of the most aggressive in the world. 🛩️ Flights were confirmed by the National Center of Meteorology shortly before the storm. 🌧️ Cloud seeding is known to intensify rainfall by up to 40% in some cases. Weather modification isn't science fiction, it's real, and it's happening. Ignoring its potential role in events like the Texas floods is not just naive, it's irresponsible. So we have to ask: Is the juice worth the squeeze? Florida doesn’t think so, the state has banned weather modification altogether. It’s time for a nationwide public debate. The stakes are too high to leave this in the shadows.

Brian Gamble

11,932 次观看 • 1 年前

Stop saying Cloud Seeding! You are all so close to understanding. Cloud Seeding introduces a CCN (cloud condensing nuclei) into the atmosphere, which will make available moisture condense and precipitate. The key to understanding the man-made nature of these floods is looking at the sheer volume of water, and comparing that to what is naturally available. According to Grok, over 8000 square miles, at 50% relative humidity, 160 billion gallons of rain can be produced from cloud seeding. In Texas we saw 2 TRILLION GALONS fall from the sky, over that same area. 2 TRILLION - in a few hours! Where did all that water vapor come from? I watched it live on Satellite. Hint, it comes from the ground. It always does. On-land, in-place, rapid water evaporation. The exposure op is clearly underway. The CEO of Rainmaker was just on Shawn Ryan. This is no coincidence. It's time for the people to know. You can only seed available moisture. You've seen this with your own eyes and just didn't realize what you were seeing. Pray for the victims. This is a crime and must stop.
1:24

Stop saying Cloud Seeding! You are all so close to understanding. Cloud Seeding introduces a CCN (cloud condensing nuclei) into the atmosphere, which will make available moisture condense and precipitate. The key to understanding the man-made nature of these floods is looking at the sheer volume of water, and comparing that to what is naturally available. According to Grok, over 8000 square miles, at 50% relative humidity, 160 billion gallons of rain can be produced from cloud seeding. In Texas we saw 2 TRILLION GALONS fall from the sky, over that same area. 2 TRILLION - in a few hours! Where did all that water vapor come from? I watched it live on Satellite. Hint, it comes from the ground. It always does. On-land, in-place, rapid water evaporation. The exposure op is clearly underway. The CEO of Rainmaker was just on Shawn Ryan. This is no coincidence. It's time for the people to know. You can only seed available moisture. You've seen this with your own eyes and just didn't realize what you were seeing. Pray for the victims. This is a crime and must stop.

Parallel 8 Media

45,122 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 “BLUE RAIN” FALLS OVER TEXAS — WHAT’S REALLY GOING ON? 🚨 🔵 Reports are flooding in from Texas National Park visitors: bizarre blue-tinted rain — AGAIN. But here’s what they’re NOT telling you… 💧 Texas has 7 active cloud seeding programs — covering over 30 million acres statewide 🌩️ Officially licensed under the Texas Weather Modification Act of 1967 🚁 Planes. Chemicals. Permits. This isn’t a conspiracy — it’s regulated reality. 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ “Weather modification” is not theory — it’s active policy ⚠️ Millions are exposed to skies being engineered without full transparency ⚠️ Unnatural weather events are becoming harder to explain — and easier to suspect 💥 If they control the weather… what else do they control? 🚨 THIS ISN’T JUST RAIN — IT’S A WARNING FROM ABOVE 🚨
0:29

🚨 “BLUE RAIN” FALLS OVER TEXAS — WHAT’S REALLY GOING ON? 🚨 🔵 Reports are flooding in from Texas National Park visitors: bizarre blue-tinted rain — AGAIN. But here’s what they’re NOT telling you… 💧 Texas has 7 active cloud seeding programs — covering over 30 million acres statewide 🌩️ Officially licensed under the Texas Weather Modification Act of 1967 🚁 Planes. Chemicals. Permits. This isn’t a conspiracy — it’s regulated reality. 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ “Weather modification” is not theory — it’s active policy ⚠️ Millions are exposed to skies being engineered without full transparency ⚠️ Unnatural weather events are becoming harder to explain — and easier to suspect 💥 If they control the weather… what else do they control? 🚨 THIS ISN’T JUST RAIN — IT’S A WARNING FROM ABOVE 🚨

Jim Ferguson

71,367 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨FACT CHECK: Kerrville Flood Wasn’t "Trump’s Fault" — But What About Cloud Seeding? 🌧️👀 1️⃣ On July 3rd at 1:18 PM, the National Weather Service issued a FLOOD WATCH warning of 5–7 inches of rain. 2️⃣ On July 4th at 1:14 AM, it was upgraded to a FLASH FLOOD WARNING—meaning it was happening or imminent. 3️⃣ By 4 AM, a FLASH FLOOD EMERGENCY was declared—the highest alert level possible. So let’s stop pretending there were “no warnings.” This isn’t a political issue—it’s a tragedy. 21 girls still missing. 4 confirmed lost. 2 found. Pray for them. 🙏 And shoutout to the Texas National Guard—boots on the ground, saving lives. Respect. But if you’ve made it this far… let’s go deeper. 🌧️💭 Ever heard of cloud seeding? Yeah. Man-made rain. I spent 90 minutes down the rabbit hole, and what I found blew my mind… 🌩️ Augustus Derico, CEO of Rainmaker, admits their company actively modifies weather using radar and drones—yes, even in Texas. This isn’t “conspiracy.” It’s state-sanctioned policy under the Texas Weather Modification Act (since 1967). It also exists in CA, NM, UT, and ID. It’s not red vs blue. It’s real. And it raises serious questions about accountability when nature goes wrong… or is it really nature? Think about that. 🔁 RT this if you believe in facts over fear. 💬 Drop your thoughts. 👀 Follow for more unfiltered breakdowns.
3:33

🚨FACT CHECK: Kerrville Flood Wasn’t "Trump’s Fault" — But What About Cloud Seeding? 🌧️👀 1️⃣ On July 3rd at 1:18 PM, the National Weather Service issued a FLOOD WATCH warning of 5–7 inches of rain. 2️⃣ On July 4th at 1:14 AM, it was upgraded to a FLASH FLOOD WARNING—meaning it was happening or imminent. 3️⃣ By 4 AM, a FLASH FLOOD EMERGENCY was declared—the highest alert level possible. So let’s stop pretending there were “no warnings.” This isn’t a political issue—it’s a tragedy. 21 girls still missing. 4 confirmed lost. 2 found. Pray for them. 🙏 And shoutout to the Texas National Guard—boots on the ground, saving lives. Respect. But if you’ve made it this far… let’s go deeper. 🌧️💭 Ever heard of cloud seeding? Yeah. Man-made rain. I spent 90 minutes down the rabbit hole, and what I found blew my mind… 🌩️ Augustus Derico, CEO of Rainmaker, admits their company actively modifies weather using radar and drones—yes, even in Texas. This isn’t “conspiracy.” It’s state-sanctioned policy under the Texas Weather Modification Act (since 1967). It also exists in CA, NM, UT, and ID. It’s not red vs blue. It’s real. And it raises serious questions about accountability when nature goes wrong… or is it really nature? Think about that. 🔁 RT this if you believe in facts over fear. 💬 Drop your thoughts. 👀 Follow for more unfiltered breakdowns.

Project Constitution

40,009 次观看 • 1 年前

THERE IT IS 🚨 Mainstream media finally reporting our skies are being sprayed to cloud seed and change the weather New cloud seeding drones are also being introduced into America We need a nationwide ban over populated areas before this expands “Well, much of the country is plagued by drought, and while cloud seeding with silver iodide powder like this is nothing new, it's been around for decades Doing it by drone, that could be a huge game changer. Leading the charge on this front is Rainmaker, a startup company here in Southern California that's already adding a bit to overall precipitation levels in California, Oregon, Idaho, and Utah. CEO Augustus Derico, especially proud of ongoing efforts to save the Great Salt Lake, which is currently just half of what it was back in the 1980s. Working with state governments in Utah and Idaho, Rainmaker has had its drones seeding clouds to enhance snowpack and runoff into Salt Lake — Drought is hardly limited to the West. In fact, much of the Southeast is currently plagued with conditions categorized as extreme or exceptional — But cloud seeding is controversial and actually banned in Florida, Tennessee, and Louisiana. Rainmaker argues there's been human intervention throughout history in handling water resources. Now, cloud seeding with drones also offers new hope with firefighting, and more moisture in the ground overall would also help with fire prevention” It’s actually been around much longer has been practiced for over 80 years and is actively used in multiple states. Cloud seeding began with experiments in the 1940s. As of 2024–2025, at least nine states have active programs: California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming Silver Iodide Dry Ice (Solid Carbon Dioxide) Sodium Chloride (Table Salt) Calcium Chloride Potassium Iodide Liquid Propane And a few more chemicals are used in cloud seeding We don’t want to be breathing this stuff in. Ban it over populated areas. Don’t forget the chemicals come down as rain and get absorbed by our crops
1:48

THERE IT IS 🚨 Mainstream media finally reporting our skies are being sprayed to cloud seed and change the weather New cloud seeding drones are also being introduced into America We need a nationwide ban over populated areas before this expands “Well, much of the country is plagued by drought, and while cloud seeding with silver iodide powder like this is nothing new, it's been around for decades Doing it by drone, that could be a huge game changer. Leading the charge on this front is Rainmaker, a startup company here in Southern California that's already adding a bit to overall precipitation levels in California, Oregon, Idaho, and Utah. CEO Augustus Derico, especially proud of ongoing efforts to save the Great Salt Lake, which is currently just half of what it was back in the 1980s. Working with state governments in Utah and Idaho, Rainmaker has had its drones seeding clouds to enhance snowpack and runoff into Salt Lake — Drought is hardly limited to the West. In fact, much of the Southeast is currently plagued with conditions categorized as extreme or exceptional — But cloud seeding is controversial and actually banned in Florida, Tennessee, and Louisiana. Rainmaker argues there's been human intervention throughout history in handling water resources. Now, cloud seeding with drones also offers new hope with firefighting, and more moisture in the ground overall would also help with fire prevention” It’s actually been around much longer has been practiced for over 80 years and is actively used in multiple states. Cloud seeding began with experiments in the 1940s. As of 2024–2025, at least nine states have active programs: California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming Silver Iodide Dry Ice (Solid Carbon Dioxide) Sodium Chloride (Table Salt) Calcium Chloride Potassium Iodide Liquid Propane And a few more chemicals are used in cloud seeding We don’t want to be breathing this stuff in. Ban it over populated areas. Don’t forget the chemicals come down as rain and get absorbed by our crops

Wall Street Apes

62,360 次观看 • 2 个月前

I joined this Texas Clear Sky Movement because I need to learn a lot more facts about what is going on and what effects whatever is going on is having on Texas. I post this hearing of Texas House State Representative Wes Virdell, TX State Rep 's on his HB 1382 which started out as a bill to eliminate weather modification and changed into one to stop geoengineering spraying in Texas. In this hearing, I, and I think the Texas House members on the panel learned a lot about the issue. My summary of the hearing is that we learned that there are two different programs/activities going on. One is rain enhancement and to a slight extent, hail size reduction activities going on in Texas that is regulated by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR). The rain enhancement activities carried out by the state spray silver iodide into developing thunderclouds in the troposphere (between 5000 and 10,000 feet) in the air with the objective of increasing the rain produced in the clouds. There are 5 or 6 companies/entities licensed to do this in Texas. One representative in the hearing said that his brother living in Oklahoma is noted that rain enhancement into a developing cell in Texas eventually developed into a tornadic system that hit his house with a tornado. He saw the correlation and presumed that the Texas cloud seeding created the tornado that hit his house. The science expert for TDLR did not agree that cloud seeding causes tornadoes. He said it is designed to create more rain. The other activity going on is the stratospheric (several miles high) spaying of aluminum compounds (and maybe barium and strontium based compounds) in the grid patterns. This is called geoengineering. A representative of one of the rain enhancement companies said that this was being done with the objective of reducing global warming by creating a haze that reflects sunlight away from the earth. I am still unclear who is doing the geoengineering spraying. Is it the federal government as the rain enhancement rep said? Or is it privately funded? I have seen a video elsewhere of a former CIA director admitting it is being done. But if it is the feds, what federal entity is doing it? How much fed money is going to do it? When was it authorized, and for what purpose? After TDLR and the entities doing the cloud seeding in Texas (some of whom testified) visited Rep Virdell to tell him about the difference between weather mod/rain enhancement and geoengineering, claiming positive and benign effects of weather modification, Virdell changed his bill to target geoengineering being done instead of any regulated or funded by the state of Texas. The bill by Virdell had the votes to get out of committee and to the House floor, but Chair Dade Phelan (the former speaker of the Texas House and the chair of the committee in the video) refused to hold a vote, so the bill died. BTW, Kerrville is in Wes Virdell's district, and he has been out doing what he can to help in the response to the devastation of the flooding in his district. Note also that the testimony from citizens was primarily targeted at the health and environmental risks associated with spaying heavy metals and silver iodide over Texas. One of the rain production proponents claimed he has never seen a study that says that silver iodide for rain seeding is not safe. But I think I heard one of the witnesses saying that there are studies that are. But, boy, I still have a lot of questions. 1) How do we know that the Texas regulated rain enhancement program is not causing these freak rainstorms? I want to see a lot more science on this. I even think that the question about the enhancement of tornadic activity by cloud seeding that was asked has not been answered to my satisfaction. And I would VERY MUCH like to know if there was any cloud seeding activity that correlates with this most recent flooding episode. 2) Who is doing the geoengineering over Texas? How was it authorized? What chemicals are they using? What health and environmental studies have been done on whatever they are spaying? 3) What studies have been done on the impacts on weather (and rain production and tornadic impact) from the geoengineering going on that takes into account the combination of BOTH Texas weather mod activity AND geoengineering spraying? (This is kind of like asking whether there have ever been any safety studies on the combination of all the vaccines being recommended for children, nowadays. It is possible that one activity by itself does not do any harm, but a combination of multiple factors does.) I argued in the hearing that we need a stop to all of this until the people of Texas have had time to have input into what is being sprayed on them and what the health, environmental, and weather impacts are on them using unbiased, special-interest free studies. I still believe that. I hope that by reading info provided in this group, I will get a lot more answers to these questions. Thanks for letting me join.
45:25

I joined this Texas Clear Sky Movement because I need to learn a lot more facts about what is going on and what effects whatever is going on is having on Texas. I post this hearing of Texas House State Representative Wes Virdell, TX State Rep 's on his HB 1382 which started out as a bill to eliminate weather modification and changed into one to stop geoengineering spraying in Texas. In this hearing, I, and I think the Texas House members on the panel learned a lot about the issue. My summary of the hearing is that we learned that there are two different programs/activities going on. One is rain enhancement and to a slight extent, hail size reduction activities going on in Texas that is regulated by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR). The rain enhancement activities carried out by the state spray silver iodide into developing thunderclouds in the troposphere (between 5000 and 10,000 feet) in the air with the objective of increasing the rain produced in the clouds. There are 5 or 6 companies/entities licensed to do this in Texas. One representative in the hearing said that his brother living in Oklahoma is noted that rain enhancement into a developing cell in Texas eventually developed into a tornadic system that hit his house with a tornado. He saw the correlation and presumed that the Texas cloud seeding created the tornado that hit his house. The science expert for TDLR did not agree that cloud seeding causes tornadoes. He said it is designed to create more rain. The other activity going on is the stratospheric (several miles high) spaying of aluminum compounds (and maybe barium and strontium based compounds) in the grid patterns. This is called geoengineering. A representative of one of the rain enhancement companies said that this was being done with the objective of reducing global warming by creating a haze that reflects sunlight away from the earth. I am still unclear who is doing the geoengineering spraying. Is it the federal government as the rain enhancement rep said? Or is it privately funded? I have seen a video elsewhere of a former CIA director admitting it is being done. But if it is the feds, what federal entity is doing it? How much fed money is going to do it? When was it authorized, and for what purpose? After TDLR and the entities doing the cloud seeding in Texas (some of whom testified) visited Rep Virdell to tell him about the difference between weather mod/rain enhancement and geoengineering, claiming positive and benign effects of weather modification, Virdell changed his bill to target geoengineering being done instead of any regulated or funded by the state of Texas. The bill by Virdell had the votes to get out of committee and to the House floor, but Chair Dade Phelan (the former speaker of the Texas House and the chair of the committee in the video) refused to hold a vote, so the bill died. BTW, Kerrville is in Wes Virdell's district, and he has been out doing what he can to help in the response to the devastation of the flooding in his district. Note also that the testimony from citizens was primarily targeted at the health and environmental risks associated with spaying heavy metals and silver iodide over Texas. One of the rain production proponents claimed he has never seen a study that says that silver iodide for rain seeding is not safe. But I think I heard one of the witnesses saying that there are studies that are. But, boy, I still have a lot of questions. 1) How do we know that the Texas regulated rain enhancement program is not causing these freak rainstorms? I want to see a lot more science on this. I even think that the question about the enhancement of tornadic activity by cloud seeding that was asked has not been answered to my satisfaction. And I would VERY MUCH like to know if there was any cloud seeding activity that correlates with this most recent flooding episode. 2) Who is doing the geoengineering over Texas? How was it authorized? What chemicals are they using? What health and environmental studies have been done on whatever they are spaying? 3) What studies have been done on the impacts on weather (and rain production and tornadic impact) from the geoengineering going on that takes into account the combination of BOTH Texas weather mod activity AND geoengineering spraying? (This is kind of like asking whether there have ever been any safety studies on the combination of all the vaccines being recommended for children, nowadays. It is possible that one activity by itself does not do any harm, but a combination of multiple factors does.) I argued in the hearing that we need a stop to all of this until the people of Texas have had time to have input into what is being sprayed on them and what the health, environmental, and weather impacts are on them using unbiased, special-interest free studies. I still believe that. I hope that by reading info provided in this group, I will get a lot more answers to these questions. Thanks for letting me join.

Tom Glass

114,959 次观看 • 1 年前

Whitney Webb just exposed the truth about Palantir’s origins. It was created to privatize mass surveillance. “Don’t tell me this is a conspiracy theory.” “Alex Karp admitted that the CIA was always the intended client of Palantir.” Webb and Mark Goodwin just broke down the truth about Palantir’s origins: After 9/11, DARPA launched the Information Awareness Office to develop a government mass surveillance apparatus. Reagan-era National Security Advisor John Poindexter led the new IAO. After massive public scrutiny and backlash, Congress defunded it. But the program never really shut down. It was moved into the private sector with the help of Peter Thiel and Alex Karp. Webb: “Peter Thiel comes, fresh off of selling PayPal … he’s got all this money, and he’s like: I’m gonna make this company called Palantir.” “Palantir … had really started off as the anti-fraud algorithm at PayPal.” “When PayPal was being created, Max Levchin sort of gave it away.” Goodwin revealed that Max Levchin essentially admitted in an interview at the time: “When I was developing all the anti-fraud stuff at PayPal, I was working with every three and four letter agency that I could.” “Meaning the CIA, and the DOD, and DARPA.” “They form PayPal in the late ‘90s.” “They make a bunch of money, and it’s Thiel and Levchin, admittedly working with the CIA and NSA, while developing this anti-fraud stuff.” “He takes that anti-fraud algorithm, which was built with the CIA in the private sector, and then rebrands it as Palantir.” Webb: “As they’re setting it up, they go through Richard Perle, who was involved with the Bush-era Department of Defense, and I believe the Office of Special Plans.” “He’s approached by Peter Thiel and Alex Karp.” “They’re basically like: we want to talk to John Poindexter, because what he was trying to do is what we want to do.” “They go and meet with Poindexter, who becomes named basically the godfather of modern surveillance because of this.” “He advises them on how to create Palantir.” “And then Palantir gets in bed pretty much right away with the CIA.” “They were their first and only client for their first six years.” Whitney Webb markgoodw.in
5:28

Whitney Webb just exposed the truth about Palantir’s origins. It was created to privatize mass surveillance. “Don’t tell me this is a conspiracy theory.” “Alex Karp admitted that the CIA was always the intended client of Palantir.” Webb and Mark Goodwin just broke down the truth about Palantir’s origins: After 9/11, DARPA launched the Information Awareness Office to develop a government mass surveillance apparatus. Reagan-era National Security Advisor John Poindexter led the new IAO. After massive public scrutiny and backlash, Congress defunded it. But the program never really shut down. It was moved into the private sector with the help of Peter Thiel and Alex Karp. Webb: “Peter Thiel comes, fresh off of selling PayPal … he’s got all this money, and he’s like: I’m gonna make this company called Palantir.” “Palantir … had really started off as the anti-fraud algorithm at PayPal.” “When PayPal was being created, Max Levchin sort of gave it away.” Goodwin revealed that Max Levchin essentially admitted in an interview at the time: “When I was developing all the anti-fraud stuff at PayPal, I was working with every three and four letter agency that I could.” “Meaning the CIA, and the DOD, and DARPA.” “They form PayPal in the late ‘90s.” “They make a bunch of money, and it’s Thiel and Levchin, admittedly working with the CIA and NSA, while developing this anti-fraud stuff.” “He takes that anti-fraud algorithm, which was built with the CIA in the private sector, and then rebrands it as Palantir.” Webb: “As they’re setting it up, they go through Richard Perle, who was involved with the Bush-era Department of Defense, and I believe the Office of Special Plans.” “He’s approached by Peter Thiel and Alex Karp.” “They’re basically like: we want to talk to John Poindexter, because what he was trying to do is what we want to do.” “They go and meet with Poindexter, who becomes named basically the godfather of modern surveillance because of this.” “He advises them on how to create Palantir.” “And then Palantir gets in bed pretty much right away with the CIA.” “They were their first and only client for their first six years.” Whitney Webb markgoodw.in

Holden Culotta

44,978 次观看 • 7 天前

For over 50 years, cloud seeding from planes & drones has been happening. But the real game-changer? Atmospheric River Steering—a tech so advanced, it can redirect massive weather systems. 🔹 In 2012, companies Acquiesce & SciBlue (a US Air Force-linked firm) jointly steered atmospheric rivers into Texas, draining rain from California. (More here) 🔹 China now has Tianhe ("Sky River")—a program to manipulate these rivers. 🔹 The UAE is investing in climate control tech. Yet ZERO accountability exists. The 1978 Environmental Modification Treaty (ENMOD) banned weather warfare—but with no enforcement mechanism, nations & corps operate in the shadows. "Thousand-year floods" keep happening. "Climate change" is the scapegoat—but the Sun & human intervention play massive roles. We need a GLOBAL SENSOR NETWORK—satellite & ground-based—to track weather manipulation in real time. THE SCIENCE ISN’T SETTLED. The tech is here. The oversight isn’t. Wake up.
5:55

For over 50 years, cloud seeding from planes & drones has been happening. But the real game-changer? Atmospheric River Steering—a tech so advanced, it can redirect massive weather systems. 🔹 In 2012, companies Acquiesce & SciBlue (a US Air Force-linked firm) jointly steered atmospheric rivers into Texas, draining rain from California. (More here) 🔹 China now has Tianhe ("Sky River")—a program to manipulate these rivers. 🔹 The UAE is investing in climate control tech. Yet ZERO accountability exists. The 1978 Environmental Modification Treaty (ENMOD) banned weather warfare—but with no enforcement mechanism, nations & corps operate in the shadows. "Thousand-year floods" keep happening. "Climate change" is the scapegoat—but the Sun & human intervention play massive roles. We need a GLOBAL SENSOR NETWORK—satellite & ground-based—to track weather manipulation in real time. THE SCIENCE ISN’T SETTLED. The tech is here. The oversight isn’t. Wake up.

Camus

28,458 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 “THIS WINTER STORM IS GOVERNMENT-MADE” -THIS DECLASSIFIED U.S. WEATHER MODIFICATION PROGRAM IS PROOF This man says the current winter storm isn’t natural and backs it up by pointing to Operation Popeye, a declassified U.S. military weather manipulation program from the Vietnam War. Operation Popeye, run from 1967 to 1972, used cloud seeding to extend monsoon seasons, flood terrain, and disrupt enemy supply lines. The goal was simple: weaponize weather to create chaos and strategic advantage. The government later admitted it happened. His argument is blunt: If intelligence agencies could deliberately alter weather over 50 years ago, with primitive technology… what are they capable of now? He says the bigger question isn’t can the government influence the weather - they already proved they can. The real question is why a massive, nationwide winter storm benefits the system: nonstop emergency coverage, public distraction, chaos, and zero focus on deeper political or economic issues. “They benefit from chaos,” he says. So is this just a storm… or the same playbook upgraded with modern tech?
1:11

🚨 “THIS WINTER STORM IS GOVERNMENT-MADE” -THIS DECLASSIFIED U.S. WEATHER MODIFICATION PROGRAM IS PROOF This man says the current winter storm isn’t natural and backs it up by pointing to Operation Popeye, a declassified U.S. military weather manipulation program from the Vietnam War. Operation Popeye, run from 1967 to 1972, used cloud seeding to extend monsoon seasons, flood terrain, and disrupt enemy supply lines. The goal was simple: weaponize weather to create chaos and strategic advantage. The government later admitted it happened. His argument is blunt: If intelligence agencies could deliberately alter weather over 50 years ago, with primitive technology… what are they capable of now? He says the bigger question isn’t can the government influence the weather - they already proved they can. The real question is why a massive, nationwide winter storm benefits the system: nonstop emergency coverage, public distraction, chaos, and zero focus on deeper political or economic issues. “They benefit from chaos,” he says. So is this just a storm… or the same playbook upgraded with modern tech?

HustleBitch

116,878 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 "FLOCK YOU PETER THIEL!" — AMERICANS ARE RAGING & FIGHTING BACK AGAINST HIS SURVEILLANCE EMPIRE People are done staying quiet. A new clip showing Peter Thiel’s companies Palantir and Flock has the internet raging. Palantir, the all-seeing data monster, hoovers up massive amounts of information and turns it into actionable intelligence. Flock blankets neighborhoods with license plate readers and cameras. They’re now bragging about “Maven Smart System”, their flagship AI tool that fuses multiple data feeds into one clean god-mode interface. Left click. Right click. Detection becomes action. No more clunky systems. Just one terrifyingly efficient machine for total surveillance and targeting. This is why people are screaming “Flock you, Peter Thiel” — because his companies are building the backbone of a full blown surveillance state in plain sight. They sell it as “public safety.” Americans see it as the end of privacy and the beginning of total control. Are you still okay with Peter Thiel building the digital cage around us, or are you finally ready to admit this is a full-blown surveillance state?
1:04

🚨 "FLOCK YOU PETER THIEL!" — AMERICANS ARE RAGING & FIGHTING BACK AGAINST HIS SURVEILLANCE EMPIRE People are done staying quiet. A new clip showing Peter Thiel’s companies Palantir and Flock has the internet raging. Palantir, the all-seeing data monster, hoovers up massive amounts of information and turns it into actionable intelligence. Flock blankets neighborhoods with license plate readers and cameras. They’re now bragging about “Maven Smart System”, their flagship AI tool that fuses multiple data feeds into one clean god-mode interface. Left click. Right click. Detection becomes action. No more clunky systems. Just one terrifyingly efficient machine for total surveillance and targeting. This is why people are screaming “Flock you, Peter Thiel” — because his companies are building the backbone of a full blown surveillance state in plain sight. They sell it as “public safety.” Americans see it as the end of privacy and the beginning of total control. Are you still okay with Peter Thiel building the digital cage around us, or are you finally ready to admit this is a full-blown surveillance state?

HustleBitch

52,705 次观看 • 19 天前

Palantir Was Engineered to Bypass the Constitution. Whitney Webb’s reporting lays out a disturbing origin story for Palantir — one that goes far beyond the glossy tech‑savior branding the company sells today. According to her research, Palantir didn’t begin as a private innovation at all. It began as a DARPA‑backed surveillance project designed to fuse government intelligence, private data, and predictive policing into a single system with almost no constitutional limits. When the program’s scope collided with civil‑liberty protections, it wasn’t shut down — it was quietly moved out of government, rebranded as a “private” company, and allowed to continue building the same tools with fewer restrictions and far less oversight. The mission didn’t change. Only the logo did. Today, Palantir markets itself as a neutral analytics platform, but its architecture reflects its origins: mass data ingestion, behavioral modeling, and real‑time tracking capabilities that raise serious questions about privacy, democratic accountability, and the merging of state power with corporate surveillance. This isn’t just a tech story. It’s a warning about how intelligence infrastructure can be laundered through the private sector to avoid constitutional scrutiny — and how easily the line between national security and domestic monitoring can disappear when no one is watching. 🎩 Whitney Webb
3:29

Palantir Was Engineered to Bypass the Constitution. Whitney Webb’s reporting lays out a disturbing origin story for Palantir — one that goes far beyond the glossy tech‑savior branding the company sells today. According to her research, Palantir didn’t begin as a private innovation at all. It began as a DARPA‑backed surveillance project designed to fuse government intelligence, private data, and predictive policing into a single system with almost no constitutional limits. When the program’s scope collided with civil‑liberty protections, it wasn’t shut down — it was quietly moved out of government, rebranded as a “private” company, and allowed to continue building the same tools with fewer restrictions and far less oversight. The mission didn’t change. Only the logo did. Today, Palantir markets itself as a neutral analytics platform, but its architecture reflects its origins: mass data ingestion, behavioral modeling, and real‑time tracking capabilities that raise serious questions about privacy, democratic accountability, and the merging of state power with corporate surveillance. This isn’t just a tech story. It’s a warning about how intelligence infrastructure can be laundered through the private sector to avoid constitutional scrutiny — and how easily the line between national security and domestic monitoring can disappear when no one is watching. 🎩 Whitney Webb

0️⃣BlackBetty ⚓️

22,785 次观看 • 8 天前

Peter Thiel on the difference between the best founders and “professional CEOs” In his book Zero To One, which is approaching its 10-year anniversary, Thiel wrote: “We need founders. If anything, we should be more tolerant of founders who seem strange or extreme. We need unusual individuals to lead companies beyond mere incrementalism.” And while he doesn’t believe there’s a simple magic formula for what a founder looks like, Thiel observes: “A lot of the great companies that have been built over the last two decades were founded by people where it was somehow deeply connected to their identity - their life’s project.” He contrasts this to Silicon Valley in the 1990s when lots of founders were replaced with professional CEOs. Thiel believes it made a big difference when it became more common for founders run the companies. He gives the example of a 22 year old Mark Zuckerberg turning down a billion dollar acquisition from Yahoo: “If you had a professional CEO, it would have just been: ‘I can’t believe they’re offering us a billion dollars. I’m going to try not to be too eager. We better take the money and run.’” Video Source: The Aspen Institute
2:45

Peter Thiel on the difference between the best founders and “professional CEOs” In his book Zero To One, which is approaching its 10-year anniversary, Thiel wrote: “We need founders. If anything, we should be more tolerant of founders who seem strange or extreme. We need unusual individuals to lead companies beyond mere incrementalism.” And while he doesn’t believe there’s a simple magic formula for what a founder looks like, Thiel observes: “A lot of the great companies that have been built over the last two decades were founded by people where it was somehow deeply connected to their identity - their life’s project.” He contrasts this to Silicon Valley in the 1990s when lots of founders were replaced with professional CEOs. Thiel believes it made a big difference when it became more common for founders run the companies. He gives the example of a 22 year old Mark Zuckerberg turning down a billion dollar acquisition from Yahoo: “If you had a professional CEO, it would have just been: ‘I can’t believe they’re offering us a billion dollars. I’m going to try not to be too eager. We better take the money and run.’” Video Source: The Aspen Institute

Startup Archive

90,927 次观看 • 2 年前