Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The question of our time: Who absorbs the loss? Governments pulled forward and misallocated decades of human effort, labor, energy, and time. An affront to our dignity. Who foots that bill? I don’t know. What I do know is if you have bitcoin in cold storage, it can’t be you

63,995 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

"The issue of non-human intelligence...begins to make people question: What is the point of suffering? What is the point of joy? What's the point of our existence?" ~MP Lewis (More FANTASTIC takes by a British politician. Imagine our President speaking like this about Disclosure?) "My constituents have a spirituality that needs to be answered." ~MP Lewis "Who knows what comes next, if anything? Why are we here? These are the kind of questions, these are profound questions that have haunted humanity for millennia. And, I think, you know, I might be a politician, I'm still a human being, and I still have those questions." ~MP Lewis ~ (How would humanity handle a non-human intelligence making open contact with us?) MP Clive Lewis - Clive Lewis MP: "There are two variations, aren't there? You've got the kind of Star Trek First Contact's kind of approach, which is that First Contact unifies humanity in a way that nothing else ever has. And then you have the kind of the response in the expanse, which you're probably aware of, a science fiction television series now, as well as a series of books by Mr. Corey. "And, you know, where it actually brings out the worst in humanity. You know, brings out the worst in us because that fear and the need to kind of take this technology or to take this knowledge and to utilize it to gain an advantage. It brings out the worst in humanity. And, you know, we could go either way. Let's be honest, we don't know. You're an anthropologist, you may have a hotter take than myself. "But as a politician who watches human nature and tries to understand it, I am aware it could go either way. You know, there's no given on this. Maybe, you know, there's a reason why some people think this knowledge is worth having because it's so profound and the implications for us could...who knows what the modeling shows, what it could do to society?" ~ "Whether you're someone who supports MAGA, someone that supports left wing politics, someone that supports the Democrats, the Labour Party, the Conservative Party. We're all human beings, it's our common humanity. And the questions that we ask about our place in the world: What's the point of our existence? Why are we here? What is the point of everything I go through every day? What is the point of suffering? What is the point of joy? What is the point of family, other than, you know, being in the moment and living it? What's the point of our existence? "Anyone who is anything must have asked that question, has asked that question, does ask that question. And I think the issue of non-human intelligence, UAP, the possibility of it really begins to make people question. And maybe, if not give answers, give some more perspective against which we can measure a metric against which we can say, 'Wow, we're not alone. You know, there are others, and they must have completely alien takes on this. Maybe they have insights into this?' "And I think anyone would want to know that. Who knows what comes next, if anything? Why are we here? These are the kind of questions, these are profound questions that have haunted humanity for millennia. And, I think, you know, I might be a politician, I'm still a human being, and I still have those questions. "And as we've been explaining, I have to temper that with my day job, the job of looking out for the material interests of my constituents. But I also know that my constituents have a spirituality that needs to be answered, if you want. And if I can play a small part in that, in unpicking some of that, that's good for me, that's good for them, that's good for the world, and I'm happy to play a small part in that." ("In British media, politics, and daily conversation, to 'unpick' something means to carefully examine its separate parts. It usually implies dismantling a complex concept." ~Cambridge Dictionary)

Joe Murgia

22,788 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen