正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

The real problem for U.S. chip bans is not that China keeps “catching up.” It is that China is starting to bypass the logic of the blockade itself. A 10,000-beam laser direct-write lithography system, 95% light uniformity, around 50nm precision, with AI deep learning improving control and efficiency. It... show more

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

49,679 subscribers

40,160 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

$🇺🇸🇨🇳 The next world order may not begin with a war. It may begin with China vetoing Washington at the UN while the U.S. discovers it no longer has the leverage to force the outcome it wants. Lt. Col. Anthony Aguilar argues the U.S. is entering a multipolar era overstretched, politically fractured, and weaker than it admits, while Beijing quietly positions itself to shape the rules of what comes next. “Anyone that thinks that the U.S. military is strong and ready for anything is simply not informed.” @AnthonyAgu88102$

🇺🇸🇨🇳 The next world order may not begin with a war. It may begin with China vetoing Washington at the UN while the U.S. discovers it no longer has the leverage to force the outcome it wants. Lt. Col. Anthony Aguilar argues the U.S. is entering a multipolar era overstretched, politically fractured, and weaker than it admits, while Beijing quietly positions itself to shape the rules of what comes next. “Anyone that thinks that the U.S. military is strong and ready for anything is simply not informed.” @AnthonyAgu88102

Mario Nawfal

90,569 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 CHINA BUILDS WHILE AMERICA BURNS BILLIONS 🚨 Marco Rubio says America does not want to contain China, but China should not rise at America’s expense. However, who is actually draining America? While China builds infrastructure, expands manufacturing, and signs business deals across the world, Washington is spending $1 billion a day on war in Iran and maintaining hundreds of military bases across the globe. That money is not being spent for the American people. It is being burned in West Asia to weaken Iran, control the Strait of Hormuz, and secure Israel’s dream of becoming the dominant empire of the region. American taxpayers are being sucked dry while China invests in its future. So maybe the problem is not that China is rising. Maybe the problem is that the United States chose empire over its own people.

🚨 CHINA BUILDS WHILE AMERICA BURNS BILLIONS 🚨 Marco Rubio says America does not want to contain China, but China should not rise at America’s expense. However, who is actually draining America? While China builds infrastructure, expands manufacturing, and signs business deals across the world, Washington is spending $1 billion a day on war in Iran and maintaining hundreds of military bases across the globe. That money is not being spent for the American people. It is being burned in West Asia to weaken Iran, control the Strait of Hormuz, and secure Israel’s dream of becoming the dominant empire of the region. American taxpayers are being sucked dry while China invests in its future. So maybe the problem is not that China is rising. Maybe the problem is that the United States chose empire over its own people.

Kevork Almassian

30,931 次观看 • 2 个月前

SpaceX was supposed to be America’s sacred crown jewel. The symbol of American innovation. The proof that only the U.S. could define the future of reusable rockets. The technological altar where Silicon Valley, Wall Street, and Washington all worshipped together. And now China has successfully completed its first controlled recovery of an orbital-class rocket booster with the Long March 10B. Not by copying the American landing-pad model. Not by repeating SpaceX’s path. China used a sea-based net-capture system — a different technical route, a Chinese solution, built for its own launch architecture. That is why this matters. China is not just entering reusable rocketry. China is entering it with its own method. For years, the West comforted itself with one myth: China can manufacture, but America still owns the frontier. EVs broke that myth. Solar broke that myth. Shipbuilding broke that myth. AI began breaking that myth. Now reusable rockets are breaking it too. SpaceX may still ahead. But the crown is no longer untouchable. China did not need permission to reach orbit. China did not need applause to recover the booster. It just built, tested, failed, learned, and came back. Again.

SpaceX was supposed to be America’s sacred crown jewel. The symbol of American innovation. The proof that only the U.S. could define the future of reusable rockets. The technological altar where Silicon Valley, Wall Street, and Washington all worshipped together. And now China has successfully completed its first controlled recovery of an orbital-class rocket booster with the Long March 10B. Not by copying the American landing-pad model. Not by repeating SpaceX’s path. China used a sea-based net-capture system — a different technical route, a Chinese solution, built for its own launch architecture. That is why this matters. China is not just entering reusable rocketry. China is entering it with its own method. For years, the West comforted itself with one myth: China can manufacture, but America still owns the frontier. EVs broke that myth. Solar broke that myth. Shipbuilding broke that myth. AI began breaking that myth. Now reusable rockets are breaking it too. SpaceX may still ahead. But the crown is no longer untouchable. China did not need permission to reach orbit. China did not need applause to recover the booster. It just built, tested, failed, learned, and came back. Again.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

60,273 次观看 • 5 天前

CNN: He claimed that China builds a lot of wind turbines and manufactures them for others, but refuses to use it itself, barely uses wind power. In fact, China is the world leader in the use of wind power. It is building additional wind power in China far faster than the pace at which the U.S. Is building in the United States itself. So the idea that China is just, you know, foisting this terrible source of energy on other countries while refusing to use it is a reversal of reality.

CNN: He claimed that China builds a lot of wind turbines and manufactures them for others, but refuses to use it itself, barely uses wind power. In fact, China is the world leader in the use of wind power. It is building additional wind power in China far faster than the pace at which the U.S. Is building in the United States itself. So the idea that China is just, you know, foisting this terrible source of energy on other countries while refusing to use it is a reversal of reality.

Acyn

213,926 次观看 • 9 个月前

The real answer is China is NOT, nor has ever been, communist. Communism is a moneyless, classless, and stateless society. The only reason China, and the Soviet Union for that matter, called itself communist was because it was a future ideal, not an established system. The cold war has literally stupefied people to the point they don't understand history or even definitions of words.🧐

The real answer is China is NOT, nor has ever been, communist. Communism is a moneyless, classless, and stateless society. The only reason China, and the Soviet Union for that matter, called itself communist was because it was a future ideal, not an established system. The cold war has literally stupefied people to the point they don't understand history or even definitions of words.🧐

ShanghaiPanda （ Account deactivation）

77,181 次观看 • 1 年前

The greatest risk we face today is not market volatility. It is not even war in the traditional sense. It is that democracies fail to reimagine sovereignty and prosperity in the age of AI. This is not a theoretical threat. It is a practical one. Because power is shifting, rapidly, from the old levers of influence to the new architecture of intelligence. Nations that cannot adapt will not only fall behind. They will lose control of their economic future, their digital infrastructure, and ultimately their political agency.

The greatest risk we face today is not market volatility. It is not even war in the traditional sense. It is that democracies fail to reimagine sovereignty and prosperity in the age of AI. This is not a theoretical threat. It is a practical one. Because power is shifting, rapidly, from the old levers of influence to the new architecture of intelligence. Nations that cannot adapt will not only fall behind. They will lose control of their economic future, their digital infrastructure, and ultimately their political agency.

Nina Schick

33,207 次观看 • 9 个月前

The real story of China’s “artificial sun” is not sci-fi aesthetics. It is industrial depth. Many countries can talk about fusion. China is building the supply-chain ecosystem that makes fusion engineering real. That is the difference between future rhetoric and future capacity.

The real story of China’s “artificial sun” is not sci-fi aesthetics. It is industrial depth. Many countries can talk about fusion. China is building the supply-chain ecosystem that makes fusion engineering real. That is the difference between future rhetoric and future capacity.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

16,595 次观看 • 3 个月前

Jensen Huang says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei Nvidia was not rejected because China “hates” Nvidia. It was pushed out because Washington turned chips into a leash. China learned the lesson very clearly: You cannot build AI sovereignty on hardware that your geopolitical rival can revoke with one export-control memo. Jensen Huang can be friendly. Nvidia can be excellent. Chinese demand can be huge. None of that changes the strategic reality. If the neck of China’s AI industry depends on an American-controlled chip supply, then it is not an industry. It is a hostage. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do: It built alternatives. It endured the pain. It let Huawei grow into the space Washington forced open. Now Nvidia says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei. That is not China closing a door. That is America sawing off the bridge, then acting surprised when China built its own road.

Jensen Huang says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei Nvidia was not rejected because China “hates” Nvidia. It was pushed out because Washington turned chips into a leash. China learned the lesson very clearly: You cannot build AI sovereignty on hardware that your geopolitical rival can revoke with one export-control memo. Jensen Huang can be friendly. Nvidia can be excellent. Chinese demand can be huge. None of that changes the strategic reality. If the neck of China’s AI industry depends on an American-controlled chip supply, then it is not an industry. It is a hostage. So China did what any serious civilization-state would do: It built alternatives. It endured the pain. It let Huawei grow into the space Washington forced open. Now Nvidia says it has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei. That is not China closing a door. That is America sawing off the bridge, then acting surprised when China built its own road.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

234,773 次观看 • 1 个月前

AI is shaping the future whether we like it or not. Technology itself is not the problem. The problem is deploying powerful tools without guardrails, transparency, or accountability. AI should be a tool that works for people – not one that extracts value and burdens workers.

AI is shaping the future whether we like it or not. Technology itself is not the problem. The problem is deploying powerful tools without guardrails, transparency, or accountability. AI should be a tool that works for people – not one that extracts value and burdens workers.

Rep. Ilhan Omar

28,248 次观看 • 5 个月前

The truth about digital ID is that it is already here. The Brit Card is a distraction, a clever psyop to make people think they have stopped something, while the real system quietly embeds itself behind the scenes. When the time comes, will people stand up or bow down to the evil controllers? Because this is what it comes down to in the end. The system of total control is being built in plain sight, and many will take the mark willingly, believing it is for their safety or convenience. We all have to say no. No matter what the cost.

The truth about digital ID is that it is already here. The Brit Card is a distraction, a clever psyop to make people think they have stopped something, while the real system quietly embeds itself behind the scenes. When the time comes, will people stand up or bow down to the evil controllers? Because this is what it comes down to in the end. The system of total control is being built in plain sight, and many will take the mark willingly, believing it is for their safety or convenience. We all have to say no. No matter what the cost.

Doc Malik

72,310 次观看 • 9 个月前

Jensen Huang just told you America is in an AI arms race where half the talent building the weapons was born on the other side. Huang: “50% of the world’s AI researchers are from China. Taking it emotionally too far from that results in consequences in relationships that are just harder to manage.” That is not diplomacy. That is the CEO of the most critical company in the AI supply chain telling you the West has a structural dependency it cannot legislate away. Half the minds capable of engineering superintelligence were born, raised, and educated inside the borders of America’s primary geopolitical rival. And Washington is writing policy as if that number does not exist. The politician sees China and reaches for tariffs. Export bans. Visa restrictions. The instinct is confrontation. The endgame is severance. Huang is telling you severance is suicide. You cannot win an intelligence race by amputating half the intelligence. America does not lead AI because of its government. It leads because the best researchers on Earth chose to be here. The compute. The capital. The culture of building. That pull is not permanent. The moment it reverses, the talent does not disappear. It goes home. And it takes the knowledge with it. Every emotionally driven export ban. Every reactionary visa restriction. Every congressional hearing staged for cameras instead of outcomes. Each one is a small push in the wrong direction on a scale that does not forgive miscalculation. China is not debating whether the technology moves too fast. They are building gigawatt-scale data centers and training sovereign models with the full weight of a state that treats AI supremacy as civilizational survival. And they are doing it with a researcher pipeline that America helped build and is now actively dismantling. Huang: “We can have a healthy competition while we compete, compete fairly, and collaborate at the same time.” That sounds reasonable until you hear what he is actually saying. The only path to American AI dominance runs directly through a relationship with the country trying to beat it. That does not fit on a campaign poster. But it is the math. The AI race is not a tariff negotiation. It is the final competition for who writes the operating system every future economy, military, and government runs on. Whoever builds superintelligence first does not get a market advantage. They get a permanent one. The kind no treaty undoes. And America is treating this like a midterm election issue while China is treating it like the last war it will ever need to fight. The danger is not that China outspends the U.S. The danger is that America mistakes emotional foreign policy for strategic foreign policy and severs the very relationships keeping it ahead. The researchers are the resource. Not the chips. Not the data centers. The people who know how to make the models think. Half of them are Chinese. And the U.S. is running a geopolitical strategy that forces those people to choose. Huang sees the board. He sells the GPUs. He knows who is buying them and who is designing on them. And he is telling you the current trajectory ends with America holding the best hardware on Earth and no one left who knows how to use it. The country that wins this will not be the one with the strongest rhetoric. It will be the one that understood the difference between controlling talent and attracting it. Right now, China is attracting. America is restricting. The algorithm does not care about flags. It scales for whoever shows up with the math. And right now, half the people who know the math are being told they are not welcome.

Jensen Huang just told you America is in an AI arms race where half the talent building the weapons was born on the other side. Huang: “50% of the world’s AI researchers are from China. Taking it emotionally too far from that results in consequences in relationships that are just harder to manage.” That is not diplomacy. That is the CEO of the most critical company in the AI supply chain telling you the West has a structural dependency it cannot legislate away. Half the minds capable of engineering superintelligence were born, raised, and educated inside the borders of America’s primary geopolitical rival. And Washington is writing policy as if that number does not exist. The politician sees China and reaches for tariffs. Export bans. Visa restrictions. The instinct is confrontation. The endgame is severance. Huang is telling you severance is suicide. You cannot win an intelligence race by amputating half the intelligence. America does not lead AI because of its government. It leads because the best researchers on Earth chose to be here. The compute. The capital. The culture of building. That pull is not permanent. The moment it reverses, the talent does not disappear. It goes home. And it takes the knowledge with it. Every emotionally driven export ban. Every reactionary visa restriction. Every congressional hearing staged for cameras instead of outcomes. Each one is a small push in the wrong direction on a scale that does not forgive miscalculation. China is not debating whether the technology moves too fast. They are building gigawatt-scale data centers and training sovereign models with the full weight of a state that treats AI supremacy as civilizational survival. And they are doing it with a researcher pipeline that America helped build and is now actively dismantling. Huang: “We can have a healthy competition while we compete, compete fairly, and collaborate at the same time.” That sounds reasonable until you hear what he is actually saying. The only path to American AI dominance runs directly through a relationship with the country trying to beat it. That does not fit on a campaign poster. But it is the math. The AI race is not a tariff negotiation. It is the final competition for who writes the operating system every future economy, military, and government runs on. Whoever builds superintelligence first does not get a market advantage. They get a permanent one. The kind no treaty undoes. And America is treating this like a midterm election issue while China is treating it like the last war it will ever need to fight. The danger is not that China outspends the U.S. The danger is that America mistakes emotional foreign policy for strategic foreign policy and severs the very relationships keeping it ahead. The researchers are the resource. Not the chips. Not the data centers. The people who know how to make the models think. Half of them are Chinese. And the U.S. is running a geopolitical strategy that forces those people to choose. Huang sees the board. He sells the GPUs. He knows who is buying them and who is designing on them. And he is telling you the current trajectory ends with America holding the best hardware on Earth and no one left who knows how to use it. The country that wins this will not be the one with the strongest rhetoric. It will be the one that understood the difference between controlling talent and attracting it. Right now, China is attracting. America is restricting. The algorithm does not care about flags. It scales for whoever shows up with the math. And right now, half the people who know the math are being told they are not welcome.

Dustin

10,925 次观看 • 3 个月前

"THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MUST PREPARE FOR WAR" Chinese leader Xi Jinping is preparing China for war. What makes me wonder is why the US is not preparing its citizens for a conflict with China. If Xi Jinping says that China is going to war, the question is who will China go to war with. The reasonable thing is that it is Taiwan and indirectly the US that is the enemy. China and North Korea are preparing their citizens for war while the US seems to live in some form of denial. I am convinced that the US is preparing militarily for a conflict. However, you also have to take responsibility for your citizens. What are your thoughts? 📌#China #Taiwan

"THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MUST PREPARE FOR WAR" Chinese leader Xi Jinping is preparing China for war. What makes me wonder is why the US is not preparing its citizens for a conflict with China. If Xi Jinping says that China is going to war, the question is who will China go to war with. The reasonable thing is that it is Taiwan and indirectly the US that is the enemy. China and North Korea are preparing their citizens for war while the US seems to live in some form of denial. I am convinced that the US is preparing militarily for a conflict. However, you also have to take responsibility for your citizens. What are your thoughts? 📌#China #Taiwan

Global Strategy

91,547 次观看 • 1 年前

Reporter: Were you worried about the 145% tariffs were doing to small businesses in the U.S.? Trump: No.. I said it is a high tariff, but I have not brought it down. It means China is not doing any business with us because it is a very high number. China is not doing any business. They were doing $1.1 trillion. Think of that. 1.1 trillion dollars. Do you know what that is? It was very unfair to us

Reporter: Were you worried about the 145% tariffs were doing to small businesses in the U.S.? Trump: No.. I said it is a high tariff, but I have not brought it down. It means China is not doing any business with us because it is a very high number. China is not doing any business. They were doing $1.1 trillion. Think of that. 1.1 trillion dollars. Do you know what that is? It was very unfair to us

Acyn

1,181,840 次观看 • 1 年前

Jensen Huang says agentic AI is not a chatbot. It is a "digital robot" -- and the next bottleneck is not the model. It is first-person data. "Agentic AI is just a digital robot. It understands, it reasons, it plans, and it acts and uses tools." Then he makes the bigger jump: "The world's video data is from a third person, not first person. And so agentic systems, robotic systems, physical AI -- the data is the hardest problem." That is the hidden constraint in robotics. LLMs got the internet. Physical AI needs demonstrations, synthetic worlds, reinforcement learning, and first-person experience. This is why Jensen keeps calling it a stack: robots are not waiting for one magical model. They need the data engine, the simulator, the reward system, the runtime, and the computer. The next wave of AI is not just software that talks. It is software that sees, plans, acts, and eventually moves through the world.

Jensen Huang says agentic AI is not a chatbot. It is a "digital robot" -- and the next bottleneck is not the model. It is first-person data. "Agentic AI is just a digital robot. It understands, it reasons, it plans, and it acts and uses tools." Then he makes the bigger jump: "The world's video data is from a third person, not first person. And so agentic systems, robotic systems, physical AI -- the data is the hardest problem." That is the hidden constraint in robotics. LLMs got the internet. Physical AI needs demonstrations, synthetic worlds, reinforcement learning, and first-person experience. This is why Jensen keeps calling it a stack: robots are not waiting for one magical model. They need the data engine, the simulator, the reward system, the runtime, and the computer. The next wave of AI is not just software that talks. It is software that sees, plans, acts, and eventually moves through the world.

Karl Mehta

14,140 次观看 • 20 天前

My proposed strategy involves great respect for China. The future for China if a strategy of denial works is to be one of the world’s two superpowers; it would command great respect and influence. Is that not a better outcome than risking it all in a major war?

My proposed strategy involves great respect for China. The future for China if a strategy of denial works is to be one of the world’s two superpowers; it would command great respect and influence. Is that not a better outcome than risking it all in a major war?

Elbridge Colby

132,890 次观看 • 2 年前

Elon Musk just named the single variable that will decide the next hundred years. It is not compute. It is not capital. It is not the chip. Musk: “Nothing will make you happier than having kids. We’ve evolved to have that, as all creatures have.” The consensus says this century belongs to whoever stacks the most GPUs. Musk is pointing at something the spreadsheets will never quantify. Look at the West. Birth rates are in freefall. Below replacement. Below recovery. Not because people stopped wanting families. Because the modern economy turned families into a math problem no one could solve. Rent took two incomes. Careers swallowed your twenties and thirties whole. Biology became a scheduling conflict you kept postponing until the window closed. A whole generation traded the continuation of their bloodline for the privilege of staying solvent. AI is about to shatter that equation permanently. When machines do the labor, your time stops being currency. The grind that ate your life ends. The moment it does, a question arrives that no algorithm can answer. If you no longer need to work to survive, what exactly is the point of you? Musk handed you the answer before the question landed. When survival is automated, you finally get the runway to do what four billion years of evolution actually built you for. Now zoom out. America is locked in an existential technology race with China over the future of intelligence itself. But China is staring down something no supercomputer can fix. The most catastrophic demographic collapse any modern nation has ever seen. A workforce aging off a cliff with no generation underneath to catch it. You do not win a long war against a country that runs out of people. The real American moat was never the chip. It was the cradle. We are racing to build superintelligence that secures the future. But a country without heirs is just a building with the lights still on. Spend the AI dividend on digital sedation and civilization dies quietly on schedule. Spend it on being human again and the West becomes physically impossible to replace. The machines will run the grid. They will route the supply chains. They will win the arms race. They will never love you back. We spent a century outsourcing our humanity to the economy. Artificial intelligence is about to buy it back. The nation that owns the future will not be the one that builds the most powerful intelligence in history. It will be the one that builds it and then walks away from the screen to go hold its children.

Elon Musk just named the single variable that will decide the next hundred years. It is not compute. It is not capital. It is not the chip. Musk: “Nothing will make you happier than having kids. We’ve evolved to have that, as all creatures have.” The consensus says this century belongs to whoever stacks the most GPUs. Musk is pointing at something the spreadsheets will never quantify. Look at the West. Birth rates are in freefall. Below replacement. Below recovery. Not because people stopped wanting families. Because the modern economy turned families into a math problem no one could solve. Rent took two incomes. Careers swallowed your twenties and thirties whole. Biology became a scheduling conflict you kept postponing until the window closed. A whole generation traded the continuation of their bloodline for the privilege of staying solvent. AI is about to shatter that equation permanently. When machines do the labor, your time stops being currency. The grind that ate your life ends. The moment it does, a question arrives that no algorithm can answer. If you no longer need to work to survive, what exactly is the point of you? Musk handed you the answer before the question landed. When survival is automated, you finally get the runway to do what four billion years of evolution actually built you for. Now zoom out. America is locked in an existential technology race with China over the future of intelligence itself. But China is staring down something no supercomputer can fix. The most catastrophic demographic collapse any modern nation has ever seen. A workforce aging off a cliff with no generation underneath to catch it. You do not win a long war against a country that runs out of people. The real American moat was never the chip. It was the cradle. We are racing to build superintelligence that secures the future. But a country without heirs is just a building with the lights still on. Spend the AI dividend on digital sedation and civilization dies quietly on schedule. Spend it on being human again and the West becomes physically impossible to replace. The machines will run the grid. They will route the supply chains. They will win the arms race. They will never love you back. We spent a century outsourcing our humanity to the economy. Artificial intelligence is about to buy it back. The nation that owns the future will not be the one that builds the most powerful intelligence in history. It will be the one that builds it and then walks away from the screen to go hold its children.

Dustin

171,709 次观看 • 2 个月前

Yesterday at One America News debate: “Communists are trying to steal the elections in Honduras that hosts the most important U.S. military base in Central America—one that China has openly sought to take over. The same logic applies to Venezuela. Why are we allowing China to take control of this hemisphere while communists steal elections across the region? Venezuela is the most important country in Latin America when it comes to natural resources and oil. How can anyone claim that removing Maduro is not in the interest of the United States? If he is allowed to do whatever he wants, the rest of the region will follow the same path, and China will dominate the continent...”

Yesterday at One America News debate: “Communists are trying to steal the elections in Honduras that hosts the most important U.S. military base in Central America—one that China has openly sought to take over. The same logic applies to Venezuela. Why are we allowing China to take control of this hemisphere while communists steal elections across the region? Venezuela is the most important country in Latin America when it comes to natural resources and oil. How can anyone claim that removing Maduro is not in the interest of the United States? If he is allowed to do whatever he wants, the rest of the region will follow the same path, and China will dominate the continent...”

Emmanuel Rincón

48,896 次观看 • 6 个月前

🇨🇳🇯🇵 China just asked Japan a question that should echo across East Asia. Is the Japanese side trying to repeat history and once again become the source of disaster in the region. China warned that Japan is barreling headlong down the path of remilitarization. It described recent moves as risky and provocative. Some Japanese politicians, it said, are using rhetoric tantamount to war mobilization. Language that echoes the militarist past. China called on all peace loving countries to remain highly vigilant and firmly resist Japan's reckless moves of neo militarism. This is not a diplomatic squabble. This is a warning. Takaichi is pushing Japan toward a future it's own constitution was designed to prevent it. China is watching. The region is watching. History is watching. Japan should answer the question honestly. Not for China. For itself. For the people who remember what happened the last time Japan became a source of disaster.

🇨🇳🇯🇵 China just asked Japan a question that should echo across East Asia. Is the Japanese side trying to repeat history and once again become the source of disaster in the region. China warned that Japan is barreling headlong down the path of remilitarization. It described recent moves as risky and provocative. Some Japanese politicians, it said, are using rhetoric tantamount to war mobilization. Language that echoes the militarist past. China called on all peace loving countries to remain highly vigilant and firmly resist Japan's reckless moves of neo militarism. This is not a diplomatic squabble. This is a warning. Takaichi is pushing Japan toward a future it's own constitution was designed to prevent it. China is watching. The region is watching. History is watching. Japan should answer the question honestly. Not for China. For itself. For the people who remember what happened the last time Japan became a source of disaster.

New Direction AFRICA

221,125 次观看 • 2 个月前

Argentina's Milei: The United States does trade with China, and the way we see it, China is a great trading partner. It means a lot of opportunities for us to expand markets, so that is not any source of conflict.

Argentina's Milei: The United States does trade with China, and the way we see it, China is a great trading partner. It means a lot of opportunities for us to expand markets, so that is not any source of conflict.

Clash Report

38,170 次观看 • 5 个月前