正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

“The reason why Nancy Pelosi's returns are so consistently good is Reg FD does not apply to people in Congress.” - Chamath Sacks: “ To put up the kind of returns that Nancy Pelosi has done over decades is nothing short of miraculous.” Jason: “It's generational.” Travis Kalanick: “She's... show more

The All-In Podcast

573,359 subscribers

78,630 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育财经

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Joe Rogan raising awareness that US Congress have become better stock traders and OUTPERFORM both Warren Buffett and George Soros “I’m sure you're aware of the Nancy Pelosi stuff. Absolutely. It's wild — It's 100% insider trading” Nancy Pelosi “We have a free market economy. They (Congress) should be able to participate in that.” “Economists have studied the portfolios of members of Congress and find they systematically outperform the stock market.” “Something fishy is going on when members of congress are doing better in the stock market than Warren Buffett.”

Joe Rogan raising awareness that US Congress have become better stock traders and OUTPERFORM both Warren Buffett and George Soros “I’m sure you're aware of the Nancy Pelosi stuff. Absolutely. It's wild — It's 100% insider trading” Nancy Pelosi “We have a free market economy. They (Congress) should be able to participate in that.” “Economists have studied the portfolios of members of Congress and find they systematically outperform the stock market.” “Something fishy is going on when members of congress are doing better in the stock market than Warren Buffett.”

Wall Street Apes

1,130,688 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨KAROLINE LEAVITT: "The reason banning members of Congress from trading stocks is a thing is because of Nancy Pelosi. She is rightfully criticized because she makes $174k a year yet she has a net worth of $413M. In 2024, Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio grew 70% in one year and outperformed every single large hedge fund and doubled even the returns of Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway. The President stands with the American people on this and doesn't want to see people like Nancy Pelosi enriching themselves off of public service and ripping off their constituents in the process."

🚨KAROLINE LEAVITT: "The reason banning members of Congress from trading stocks is a thing is because of Nancy Pelosi. She is rightfully criticized because she makes $174k a year yet she has a net worth of $413M. In 2024, Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio grew 70% in one year and outperformed every single large hedge fund and doubled even the returns of Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway. The President stands with the American people on this and doesn't want to see people like Nancy Pelosi enriching themselves off of public service and ripping off their constituents in the process."

Autism Capital 🧩

1,074,463 次观看 • 1 年前

Chamath explains Warren Buffett’s secret to success: “Markets thrive when there's information asymmetry” “Now I'm gonna get a lot of people really upset with me.” “This is an example of Warren Buffet's returns pre- and post-Reg FD. Now what do you see?” “His returns were double the market returns when this kind of information sharing was legal.” “And the minute that it became illegal and you had to act on the same edge as everybody else, his returns went to the market return. He generated zero alpha. In fact, he probably, on the margins, lost a little bit.” “So this is the single best investor in the world. This is what happens when you have information symmetry.” “So it's just meant to explain that markets thrive when there's asymmetry. Billions and billions of dollars will be made in asymmetry.” “The prediction markets today, unless they are regulated out of existence or shut down, will look like the stock market pre-Reg FD, and there's nothing we can do except choose not to bet it, because otherwise what you're going to have are a ton of sharps taking advantage of a ton of squares.”

Chamath explains Warren Buffett’s secret to success: “Markets thrive when there's information asymmetry” “Now I'm gonna get a lot of people really upset with me.” “This is an example of Warren Buffet's returns pre- and post-Reg FD. Now what do you see?” “His returns were double the market returns when this kind of information sharing was legal.” “And the minute that it became illegal and you had to act on the same edge as everybody else, his returns went to the market return. He generated zero alpha. In fact, he probably, on the margins, lost a little bit.” “So this is the single best investor in the world. This is what happens when you have information symmetry.” “So it's just meant to explain that markets thrive when there's asymmetry. Billions and billions of dollars will be made in asymmetry.” “The prediction markets today, unless they are regulated out of existence or shut down, will look like the stock market pre-Reg FD, and there's nothing we can do except choose not to bet it, because otherwise what you're going to have are a ton of sharps taking advantage of a ton of squares.”

The All-In Podcast

393,188 次观看 • 6 个月前

.Karoline Leavitt: "The reason that this idea to put a ban on stock trading for members of Congress is even a thing is because of Nancy Pelosi... she makes $174,000 a year, yet she has a net worth of approximately $413M. In 2024, Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio... grew 70%—in one year."

.Karoline Leavitt: "The reason that this idea to put a ban on stock trading for members of Congress is even a thing is because of Nancy Pelosi... she makes $174,000 a year, yet she has a net worth of approximately $413M. In 2024, Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio... grew 70%—in one year."

Rapid Response 47

426,321 次观看 • 1 年前

Nancy Mace calls out Pam Bondi, "I believe that Bondi has been less than truthful with the American people and with Congress.. I want to know where the [Epstein] files are that were on her desk, because they are not in the hands of Congress."

Nancy Mace calls out Pam Bondi, "I believe that Bondi has been less than truthful with the American people and with Congress.. I want to know where the [Epstein] files are that were on her desk, because they are not in the hands of Congress."

Defiant L’s

22,110 次观看 • 5 个月前

ANNA PAULINA LUNA: “Nancy Pelosi, by the time that she announced that she was no longer seeking office, had outperformed Warren Buffett. We’ve nicknamed her the REAL ‘Wolf of Wall Street.’” “She's currently outperformed the S&P and made over 17,000% returns on her stock investment.” “That statistically does not happen unless you are engaged in insider trading.”

ANNA PAULINA LUNA: “Nancy Pelosi, by the time that she announced that she was no longer seeking office, had outperformed Warren Buffett. We’ve nicknamed her the REAL ‘Wolf of Wall Street.’” “She's currently outperformed the S&P and made over 17,000% returns on her stock investment.” “That statistically does not happen unless you are engaged in insider trading.”

Fox News

261,239 次观看 • 8 个月前

Jason Calacanis and Chamath explain the real reason Americans are turning against AI. Regular Americans don’t care about “AI safety.” They’re watching tech executives get rich while their wages stagnate and inflation eats them alive. Jason: “What two things can they do? They can vote for socialists and they can actually stop data centers. And that’s what this is about… The discussion for them is why am I not getting rich and everybody else is?” Chamath: “This generation of tech oligarchs who have won are pretty displeasing. They’re not aspirational. They’re not the people one would look up to. They’re not Steve Jobs by any stretch of the imagination. And now people look at the next generation and think, ‘We’re going from billionaire, to decabillionaire, to centibillionaire, to trillionaire… and it’s those guys. Those guys are even worse than the last crop.’ They’re like, if we can just slow this down, maybe another batch of people will show up who actually mean to do the right thing. And I won’t be so begrudgingly hating the fact that you’re about to make a trillion dollars.” When people feel they have no power, they reach for the only levers they can find. @jason Chamath Palihapitiya

Jason Calacanis and Chamath explain the real reason Americans are turning against AI. Regular Americans don’t care about “AI safety.” They’re watching tech executives get rich while their wages stagnate and inflation eats them alive. Jason: “What two things can they do? They can vote for socialists and they can actually stop data centers. And that’s what this is about… The discussion for them is why am I not getting rich and everybody else is?” Chamath: “This generation of tech oligarchs who have won are pretty displeasing. They’re not aspirational. They’re not the people one would look up to. They’re not Steve Jobs by any stretch of the imagination. And now people look at the next generation and think, ‘We’re going from billionaire, to decabillionaire, to centibillionaire, to trillionaire… and it’s those guys. Those guys are even worse than the last crop.’ They’re like, if we can just slow this down, maybe another batch of people will show up who actually mean to do the right thing. And I won’t be so begrudgingly hating the fact that you’re about to make a trillion dollars.” When people feel they have no power, they reach for the only levers they can find. @jason Chamath Palihapitiya

jay plemons

27,067 次观看 • 10 天前

🚨 JUST IN: Tim Burchett reveals that members of Congress are so CROOKED that the bill to BAN them from Stock Trading will likely fail. "Will the bill pass? Probably not. But I'm not going to quit, I mean, people are getting Rich." "The average stock trader in Congress is making like 600% returns or something."

🚨 JUST IN: Tim Burchett reveals that members of Congress are so CROOKED that the bill to BAN them from Stock Trading will likely fail. "Will the bill pass? Probably not. But I'm not going to quit, I mean, people are getting Rich." "The average stock trader in Congress is making like 600% returns or something."

The Patriot Oasis™

251,821 次观看 • 9 个月前

REP. LUNA: “THE REAL WOLF OF WALL STREET” Rep. Anna Paulina Luna said Nancy Pelosi “outperformed the S&P and made over 17,000% returns,” adding, “That statistically does not happen unless you are engaged in insider trading.” Turning Point USA

REP. LUNA: “THE REAL WOLF OF WALL STREET” Rep. Anna Paulina Luna said Nancy Pelosi “outperformed the S&P and made over 17,000% returns,” adding, “That statistically does not happen unless you are engaged in insider trading.” Turning Point USA

Real America's Voice (RAV)

16,152 次观看 • 8 个月前

JUST IN: Chamath Palihapitiya makes a big claim that Warren Buffett’s insane pre 2000 returns may have benefited from access to information asymmetry not available to the public Here's what he had to say: "In 2000, we introduced the law called Reg FD. And what was the point of Reg FD? It was basically that if you're a CFO, you cannot talk to an individual stock manager and tell him something that you then don't tell everybody else. Essentially inside information. That used to be not illegal. I won't say that it was legal. I would just say that used to be not illegal. You call your CFO buddy, he says, "hey, how you doing?" He goes, man, "Quarter was a blockbuster." You would go and buy the stock. And starting in the 2000s, it became illegal. And there used to be these networks of information arbitrage that took advantage of this. Now, this is an example of Warren Buffett's returns, pre and post Reg FD. Now, what do you see? His returns were double the market returns when this kind of information sharing was legal. And the minute that it became illegal and you had to basically act on the same edge as everybody else, his returns went to the market return. He generated zero alpha. In fact, he probably on the margins lost a little bit. So this is the single best investor in the world. This is what happens when you have information symmetry. So it's just meant to explain that markets when there's asymmetry. Billions and billions of dollars will be made in asymmetry. The prediction markets today, unless they are regulated out of existence or shut down, will look like the stock market pre-Reg FD."

JUST IN: Chamath Palihapitiya makes a big claim that Warren Buffett’s insane pre 2000 returns may have benefited from access to information asymmetry not available to the public Here's what he had to say: "In 2000, we introduced the law called Reg FD. And what was the point of Reg FD? It was basically that if you're a CFO, you cannot talk to an individual stock manager and tell him something that you then don't tell everybody else. Essentially inside information. That used to be not illegal. I won't say that it was legal. I would just say that used to be not illegal. You call your CFO buddy, he says, "hey, how you doing?" He goes, man, "Quarter was a blockbuster." You would go and buy the stock. And starting in the 2000s, it became illegal. And there used to be these networks of information arbitrage that took advantage of this. Now, this is an example of Warren Buffett's returns, pre and post Reg FD. Now, what do you see? His returns were double the market returns when this kind of information sharing was legal. And the minute that it became illegal and you had to basically act on the same edge as everybody else, his returns went to the market return. He generated zero alpha. In fact, he probably on the margins lost a little bit. So this is the single best investor in the world. This is what happens when you have information symmetry. So it's just meant to explain that markets when there's asymmetry. Billions and billions of dollars will be made in asymmetry. The prediction markets today, unless they are regulated out of existence or shut down, will look like the stock market pre-Reg FD."

Triple Net Investor

1,307,997 次观看 • 6 个月前

🇺🇸TUCKER: HOW DID NANCY PELOSI GET SO RICH? Tucker: "I have no clue at all how Nancy Pelosi is just so rich or how her stock picks are, like, way better than Warren Buffett's. How does that happen?" Tulsi Gabbard: "There should be no perception that our elected leaders are profiting off of the knowledge that they have as policymakers that directly impact industry and businesses. That's a no-brainer to me. I introduced legislation I was in Congress to do that. Why hasn't it gone anywhere? That's why: because they profit from it, so they don't want to talk about it." Source: Tucker Carlson Encounter

🇺🇸TUCKER: HOW DID NANCY PELOSI GET SO RICH? Tucker: "I have no clue at all how Nancy Pelosi is just so rich or how her stock picks are, like, way better than Warren Buffett's. How does that happen?" Tulsi Gabbard: "There should be no perception that our elected leaders are profiting off of the knowledge that they have as policymakers that directly impact industry and businesses. That's a no-brainer to me. I introduced legislation I was in Congress to do that. Why hasn't it gone anywhere? That's why: because they profit from it, so they don't want to talk about it." Source: Tucker Carlson Encounter

Mario Nawfal

1,718,408 次观看 • 2 年前

Rep. Nancy Mace: "I believe Pam Bondi has been less than truthful with the American people and Congress on the Epstein files. I want to know where the files are that were on her desk, because they're not in the hands of Congress ... I want to know why this is continuing to be covered up."

Rep. Nancy Mace: "I believe Pam Bondi has been less than truthful with the American people and Congress on the Epstein files. I want to know where the files are that were on her desk, because they're not in the hands of Congress ... I want to know why this is continuing to be covered up."

Aaron Rupar

43,545 次观看 • 5 个月前

Why is business writing so dry? One reason is that so much of the writing we do in school is fake. The essays are fake in grade school and the business plans are fake in grad school. Teach kids to write fake things as kids and they'll end up writing fake things as adults. Jason Fried

Why is business writing so dry? One reason is that so much of the writing we do in school is fake. The essays are fake in grade school and the business plans are fake in grad school. Teach kids to write fake things as kids and they'll end up writing fake things as adults. Jason Fried

David Perell

27,424 次观看 • 2 年前

This is the reason why men should be present in the lives of their children. They handle situations that women can’t handle. Good men are excellent guardians.

This is the reason why men should be present in the lives of their children. They handle situations that women can’t handle. Good men are excellent guardians.

SceneSurgeHQ

46,801 次观看 • 2 个月前

Get @reshare_app • Fox News ANNA PAULINA LUNA: “Nancy Pelosi, by the time that she announced that she was no longer seeking office, had outperformed Warren Buffett. We’ve nicknamed her the REAL ‘Wolf of Wall Street.’” “She's currently outperformed the S&P and made over 17,000% returns on her stock investment.” “That statistically does not happen unless you are engaged in insider trading.”

Get @reshare_app • Fox News ANNA PAULINA LUNA: “Nancy Pelosi, by the time that she announced that she was no longer seeking office, had outperformed Warren Buffett. We’ve nicknamed her the REAL ‘Wolf of Wall Street.’” “She's currently outperformed the S&P and made over 17,000% returns on her stock investment.” “That statistically does not happen unless you are engaged in insider trading.”

Anna Paulina Luna

51,608 次观看 • 8 个月前

Nick Fuentes explains why America should be a Christian nation. "People think that things are going to go the way they are without Christianity, not understanding that Christianity is a fundamental pillar in how things got to be this good."

Nick Fuentes explains why America should be a Christian nation. "People think that things are going to go the way they are without Christianity, not understanding that Christianity is a fundamental pillar in how things got to be this good."

Fuentes Updates

49,177 次观看 • 9 个月前

Barack Obama ruined American healthcare and here are the facts “At the heart of the shutdown debate is whether or not Congress should extend these expanded temporary Obamacare subsidies. Here are 6 reasons why they shouldn't be extended - The first is that they cost almost half a trillion dollars. And at a time when we have $2 trillion annual deficits, we can't afford to throw more fuel on our fiscal bonfire - The second reason is that they're largely welfare for the well off. These credits can be claimed by people earning up to $600,000 a year. About a third of the cost goes to people over 400% of the poverty line. So they're simply not well targeted to people in need - The third reason is the subsidies are largely captured by insurance companies. The subsidy themselves goes directly to insurance companies and then it's captured in the form of higher price inflation and larger profits by these large insurance companies. - Fourth reason is that they fuel rampant enrollment fraud. More than 6 million people are improperly enrolled and millions more don't use the coverage that they're enrolled in, signaling that there's more people enrolled in the program than there should be - Fifth reason is that patients don't value the coverage. They only are enrolled because the federal government is covering 100% of of the cost for many people. And if the government only covered 90% of the cost, they would choose to spend their own money on something they value more. - The last reason is these subsidies were initially temporary on purpose. They were a response to the pandemic and the pandemic is over. And these are the reasons Congress should let these subsidies expire. They are expensive, they're not well targeted, and they fuel rampant fraud in our healthcare system.”

Barack Obama ruined American healthcare and here are the facts “At the heart of the shutdown debate is whether or not Congress should extend these expanded temporary Obamacare subsidies. Here are 6 reasons why they shouldn't be extended - The first is that they cost almost half a trillion dollars. And at a time when we have $2 trillion annual deficits, we can't afford to throw more fuel on our fiscal bonfire - The second reason is that they're largely welfare for the well off. These credits can be claimed by people earning up to $600,000 a year. About a third of the cost goes to people over 400% of the poverty line. So they're simply not well targeted to people in need - The third reason is the subsidies are largely captured by insurance companies. The subsidy themselves goes directly to insurance companies and then it's captured in the form of higher price inflation and larger profits by these large insurance companies. - Fourth reason is that they fuel rampant enrollment fraud. More than 6 million people are improperly enrolled and millions more don't use the coverage that they're enrolled in, signaling that there's more people enrolled in the program than there should be - Fifth reason is that patients don't value the coverage. They only are enrolled because the federal government is covering 100% of of the cost for many people. And if the government only covered 90% of the cost, they would choose to spend their own money on something they value more. - The last reason is these subsidies were initially temporary on purpose. They were a response to the pandemic and the pandemic is over. And these are the reasons Congress should let these subsidies expire. They are expensive, they're not well targeted, and they fuel rampant fraud in our healthcare system.”

Wall Street Apes

77,528 次观看 • 10 个月前

Any member of Congress that says that there is no insider trading in Congress is lying to you! Members are getting +600% on their returns. It is insane and corrupt. The American people overwhelmingly support a ban on stock trading for members but congress doesn’t? I wonder why. We will force this vote.

Any member of Congress that says that there is no insider trading in Congress is lying to you! Members are getting +600% on their returns. It is insane and corrupt. The American people overwhelmingly support a ban on stock trading for members but congress doesn’t? I wonder why. We will force this vote.

Anna Paulina Luna

212,878 次观看 • 9 个月前