Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

The ruling BNP has established a Special Committee on Constitutional Amendment. By doing this, they have completely betrayed the clear mandate given by the people in the referendum. Meaningful and lasting changes to the constitution and state structure are impossible without a Constitutional Reform Council. Instead of choosing this... show more

Nahid Islam

39,703 subscribers

11,325 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

BJP President J.P. Nadda threatens to withhold constitutional rights from the people of Karnataka if they don't vote for the corrupt 40% BJP govt. This is a blatant attack on democracy and shows how the BJP plans to treat the Kannadigas. We are not subjects of a Raja but citizens of a federal country governed by the constitution.

BJP President J.P. Nadda threatens to withhold constitutional rights from the people of Karnataka if they don't vote for the corrupt 40% BJP govt. This is a blatant attack on democracy and shows how the BJP plans to treat the Kannadigas. We are not subjects of a Raja but citizens of a federal country governed by the constitution.

Congress

576,144 views • 3 years ago

Read the Constitution, grow a spine, stand up for the American People and the Constitutional power to decide when we send Americans to fight.

Read the Constitution, grow a spine, stand up for the American People and the Constitutional power to decide when we send Americans to fight.

Congressman Chris Deluzio

39,233 views • 7 months ago

This is how we welcome you in ghetto,naye mbadde manyi amuse😂. Honorable Luyimbazi Nalukoola is on ground trying to fulfill he's constitutional mandate as the bridge between the people and the state.

This is how we welcome you in ghetto,naye mbadde manyi amuse😂. Honorable Luyimbazi Nalukoola is on ground trying to fulfill he's constitutional mandate as the bridge between the people and the state.

Mwami lu

54,617 views • 6 months ago

The Republic of Togo has been thrown into a state of turmoil amidst widespread agitations and protests over constitutional reforms that allow the current president, Faure Gnassingbé to remain in power indefinitely. Youth groups and activists have led the major protests, calling for his immediate resignation in the first ever protests since 2022, after a ban on mass demonstrations was imposed. A son of the former president of Togo, Gnassingbé Eyademéma, the 59-year old was sworn in after the death of his father in 2005 and has since ruled the nation. In May 2025 after a completion of his 20 years rule in February, he was sworn in as the first president of the Council of Ministers, a powerful role that has no official term limits and described by opposition figures as a ‘constitutional coup’.

The Republic of Togo has been thrown into a state of turmoil amidst widespread agitations and protests over constitutional reforms that allow the current president, Faure Gnassingbé to remain in power indefinitely. Youth groups and activists have led the major protests, calling for his immediate resignation in the first ever protests since 2022, after a ban on mass demonstrations was imposed. A son of the former president of Togo, Gnassingbé Eyademéma, the 59-year old was sworn in after the death of his father in 2005 and has since ruled the nation. In May 2025 after a completion of his 20 years rule in February, he was sworn in as the first president of the Council of Ministers, a powerful role that has no official term limits and described by opposition figures as a ‘constitutional coup’.

SIKAOFFICIAL🦍

313,096 views • 1 year ago

🚨 BREAKING NEWS 🚨 As of April 2026, Reform UK Lincolnshire County Council has the LOWEST COUNTY COUNCIL TAX PRECEPT IN THE COUNTRY! 🇬🇧🎉 Based on data recently published by the government and taking into account that we are also a fire authority 🚒, we now have the lowest precept for any upper tier council! That's because of: ✅ SAVINGS OF OVER £60 million pounds ✅ One of the LOWEST council tax rises of 2.9% for 2025/26 ✅ All while also delivering for the people of Lincolnshire! Get a Reform Council, Vote Reform UK on May 7th! ➡️ Cllr Sean Matthews - Reform UK Cllr Natalie Oliver

🚨 BREAKING NEWS 🚨 As of April 2026, Reform UK Lincolnshire County Council has the LOWEST COUNTY COUNCIL TAX PRECEPT IN THE COUNTRY! 🇬🇧🎉 Based on data recently published by the government and taking into account that we are also a fire authority 🚒, we now have the lowest precept for any upper tier council! That's because of: ✅ SAVINGS OF OVER £60 million pounds ✅ One of the LOWEST council tax rises of 2.9% for 2025/26 ✅ All while also delivering for the people of Lincolnshire! Get a Reform Council, Vote Reform UK on May 7th! ➡️ Cllr Sean Matthews - Reform UK Cllr Natalie Oliver

Cllr Bayleigh Robinson

16,061 views • 4 months ago

America is a people, not an idea, not a marketplace, and certainly not a “creedal nation.” The modern absurdity of the “creedal nation” thesis, endlessly repeated by hostile elites and the managerial class, including people like Neil Gorsuch, rests upon the belief that America is fundamentally held together not by a continuous historical people, but by adherence to abstract constitutional propositions. A constitution is not a mystical tablet suspended above history, nor a set of abstract propositions existing independently of the people, and thus the civilization, that produced them. It is the political expression of a particular people shaped by a continuous cultural inheritance and a shared conception of legitimacy. The American constitutional system did not emerge from universal abstractions floating in a vacuum; it arose from a distinct Anglo-American founding population and the cultural hegemony it established, rooted within the broader continuity of the European peoples who settled and shaped the early republic. Their understanding of liberty and sovereignty had already been formed long before the Declaration of Independence gave formal expression to those assumptions. The American founding was not the birth of an abstract creed for all mankind, but the formalization of a political order already embodied within a particular civilization and the people from whom it emerged. Once that continuity is severed, once the founding people for whom the constitution served as a reflection of their own character begin to fade from history or disappear altogether, constitutional interpretation becomes increasingly unstable, because the text remains while the community that once gave it coherence gradually recedes from existence. The words survive, yet their meaning shifts according to the assumptions of those interpreting them. “Liberty,” “equality,” “rights,” and even citizenship itself become endlessly elastic concepts, detached from the framework that once constrained them. Under such conditions, the creed ceases to function as a real foundation and instead becomes a rhetorical instrument through which competing factions impose their own political preferences while cloaking them in the language of constitutional inevitability. The constitution itself slowly ceases to function as an inheritance and instead becomes a battleground over who possesses the authority to redefine the nation. This is the contradiction at the center of the “creedal nation” thesis. A creed cannot sustain a fixed national meaning once severed from the people who produced it. If the White population from which the constitutional order emerged is transformed beyond recognition or disappears altogether, then the creed itself becomes untethered from any stable interpretation. The constitutional language remains, but its meaning shifts with each successive population interpreting it through different assumptions about society and legitimacy. Under such conditions, the nation no longer possesses a stable constitutional identity, because the historical community from which that identity emerged no longer exists in the same civilizational sense. What remains is not fidelity to a permanent constitutional inheritance, but an endless struggle over the power to redefine the nation itself.

America is a people, not an idea, not a marketplace, and certainly not a “creedal nation.” The modern absurdity of the “creedal nation” thesis, endlessly repeated by hostile elites and the managerial class, including people like Neil Gorsuch, rests upon the belief that America is fundamentally held together not by a continuous historical people, but by adherence to abstract constitutional propositions. A constitution is not a mystical tablet suspended above history, nor a set of abstract propositions existing independently of the people, and thus the civilization, that produced them. It is the political expression of a particular people shaped by a continuous cultural inheritance and a shared conception of legitimacy. The American constitutional system did not emerge from universal abstractions floating in a vacuum; it arose from a distinct Anglo-American founding population and the cultural hegemony it established, rooted within the broader continuity of the European peoples who settled and shaped the early republic. Their understanding of liberty and sovereignty had already been formed long before the Declaration of Independence gave formal expression to those assumptions. The American founding was not the birth of an abstract creed for all mankind, but the formalization of a political order already embodied within a particular civilization and the people from whom it emerged. Once that continuity is severed, once the founding people for whom the constitution served as a reflection of their own character begin to fade from history or disappear altogether, constitutional interpretation becomes increasingly unstable, because the text remains while the community that once gave it coherence gradually recedes from existence. The words survive, yet their meaning shifts according to the assumptions of those interpreting them. “Liberty,” “equality,” “rights,” and even citizenship itself become endlessly elastic concepts, detached from the framework that once constrained them. Under such conditions, the creed ceases to function as a real foundation and instead becomes a rhetorical instrument through which competing factions impose their own political preferences while cloaking them in the language of constitutional inevitability. The constitution itself slowly ceases to function as an inheritance and instead becomes a battleground over who possesses the authority to redefine the nation. This is the contradiction at the center of the “creedal nation” thesis. A creed cannot sustain a fixed national meaning once severed from the people who produced it. If the White population from which the constitutional order emerged is transformed beyond recognition or disappears altogether, then the creed itself becomes untethered from any stable interpretation. The constitutional language remains, but its meaning shifts with each successive population interpreting it through different assumptions about society and legitimacy. Under such conditions, the nation no longer possesses a stable constitutional identity, because the historical community from which that identity emerged no longer exists in the same civilizational sense. What remains is not fidelity to a permanent constitutional inheritance, but an endless struggle over the power to redefine the nation itself.

Chad Crowley

17,235 views • 3 months ago

Today, we joined the 30th anniversary celebration of the Constitutional Court's founding, an event hosted by Chief Justice Mandisa Maya at Constitution Hill. Honoring this institution inspires a society to uphold and defend the rights and freedoms of its citizens, furthering the development of a more equitable and harmonious future.

Today, we joined the 30th anniversary celebration of the Constitutional Court's founding, an event hosted by Chief Justice Mandisa Maya at Constitution Hill. Honoring this institution inspires a society to uphold and defend the rights and freedoms of its citizens, furthering the development of a more equitable and harmonious future.

Khumbudzo Ntshavheni

39,865 views • 1 year ago

My sincere gratitude to H.E. President Dr E.D. Mnangagwa for listening to the people of Zimbabwe and assenting to Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3. It ceases to be a Bill. It is now Constitutional Amendment Act No. 3, the supreme law of the land, duly gazetted and binding.

My sincere gratitude to H.E. President Dr E.D. Mnangagwa for listening to the people of Zimbabwe and assenting to Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3. It ceases to be a Bill. It is now Constitutional Amendment Act No. 3, the supreme law of the land, duly gazetted and binding.

Hon Prof Mthuli Ncube

52,826 views • 1 month ago

This video shows the home of Gilbert Bgwende, a member of the Constitutional Defence Forum, engulfed in flames in the early hours of yesterday in Highfield in Harare. Bgwende is one of the members of the Constitutional Defence Forum who have been vocal in opposing President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s bid to extend his rule to 2030. According to witnesses, the arsonists arrived in three black cars, ordered the occupants to vacate the house, poured a flammable substance, and set it ablaze. Two police officers are currently on the scene, but the house has been completely destroyed and is now uninhabitable. The seminar room at SAPES, which was meant to be used by a group of civil society and political leaders to launch their resistance against President Mnangagwa’s 2030 term extension, was also torched in the early hours of yesterday and completely gutted to the ground. The attack, coming just hours before the planned press conference, underscores the regime’s growing desperation to silence dissenting voices and suppress any organised opposition to the 2030 agenda. Interestingly, the 2030 Agenda has inadvertently breathed new life into opposition politics in Zimbabwe. Where there was once apathy and fragmentation in response to the country’s political decay, the push for a term extension has now united groups and individuals who were previously divided, bringing together former rivals under a common cause to resist it. In attempting to consolidate power, the regime has instead rekindled political consciousness and solidarity among those determined to defend Zimbabwe’s constitutional order.

This video shows the home of Gilbert Bgwende, a member of the Constitutional Defence Forum, engulfed in flames in the early hours of yesterday in Highfield in Harare. Bgwende is one of the members of the Constitutional Defence Forum who have been vocal in opposing President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s bid to extend his rule to 2030. According to witnesses, the arsonists arrived in three black cars, ordered the occupants to vacate the house, poured a flammable substance, and set it ablaze. Two police officers are currently on the scene, but the house has been completely destroyed and is now uninhabitable. The seminar room at SAPES, which was meant to be used by a group of civil society and political leaders to launch their resistance against President Mnangagwa’s 2030 term extension, was also torched in the early hours of yesterday and completely gutted to the ground. The attack, coming just hours before the planned press conference, underscores the regime’s growing desperation to silence dissenting voices and suppress any organised opposition to the 2030 agenda. Interestingly, the 2030 Agenda has inadvertently breathed new life into opposition politics in Zimbabwe. Where there was once apathy and fragmentation in response to the country’s political decay, the push for a term extension has now united groups and individuals who were previously divided, bringing together former rivals under a common cause to resist it. In attempting to consolidate power, the regime has instead rekindled political consciousness and solidarity among those determined to defend Zimbabwe’s constitutional order.

Hopewell Chin’ono

29,076 views • 10 months ago

After the 2013 earthquake, a very dangerous military operation was carried out in Awaran, and the entire region was sieged and turned into a military zone. For at least the last ten years, Awaran has been a complete war zone, but despite all this, the state has not been able to enslave the minds and consciousness of the people. The large participation of thousands of people, especially women, in mass demonstration on the call of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee today proved that the Baloch people are now completely fed up with state oppression and barbarism. Now, the decision is in the hands of the people and not the state. Thank You Awaran 🌹 #MarchAganistBalochGenocide #IStandWithBalochMarch

After the 2013 earthquake, a very dangerous military operation was carried out in Awaran, and the entire region was sieged and turned into a military zone. For at least the last ten years, Awaran has been a complete war zone, but despite all this, the state has not been able to enslave the minds and consciousness of the people. The large participation of thousands of people, especially women, in mass demonstration on the call of the Baloch Yakjehti Committee today proved that the Baloch people are now completely fed up with state oppression and barbarism. Now, the decision is in the hands of the people and not the state. Thank You Awaran 🌹 #MarchAganistBalochGenocide #IStandWithBalochMarch

Mahrang Baloch

58,484 views • 2 years ago

NOW: Over a thousand people outside the Ministry of Justice to protest in support of the hunger strikers 🇵🇸 We demand their demands are met, including immediate bail and immediate action by the government to stop arming Israel now.

NOW: Over a thousand people outside the Ministry of Justice to protest in support of the hunger strikers 🇵🇸 We demand their demands are met, including immediate bail and immediate action by the government to stop arming Israel now.

Palestine Solidarity Campaign

90,529 views • 8 months ago

I had a meeting with the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, Alain Berset. I am grateful for the Council of Europe’s support for Ukraine. We discussed the need to establish a Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression, as it is crucial to hold Russian war criminals accountable. Another key issue was the release of prisoners and the return of Ukrainian children illegally deported by Russia. We highly value the Council of Europe’s role in establishing the Register of Damage as part of the International Compensation Mechanism. Ukraine looks forward to the creation of the Claims Commission and the Compensation Fund and counts on the Council of Europe’s leadership in this process.

I had a meeting with the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, Alain Berset. I am grateful for the Council of Europe’s support for Ukraine. We discussed the need to establish a Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression, as it is crucial to hold Russian war criminals accountable. Another key issue was the release of prisoners and the return of Ukrainian children illegally deported by Russia. We highly value the Council of Europe’s role in establishing the Register of Damage as part of the International Compensation Mechanism. Ukraine looks forward to the creation of the Claims Commission and the Compensation Fund and counts on the Council of Europe’s leadership in this process.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

151,447 views • 1 year ago

The special representative of the United Nations in Somalia, James Swan has called for the continuation of political dialogue, urging the federal government and the opposition Somali Future Council to persist in their efforts to reach a consensus

The special representative of the United Nations in Somalia, James Swan has called for the continuation of political dialogue, urging the federal government and the opposition Somali Future Council to persist in their efforts to reach a consensus

Dalsan TV

12,616 views • 6 months ago

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents just illegally broke into another home without a judicial warrant, this time in Jersey city. Witnesses say they followed a man who ran inside a house, and instead of stopping there… they forced their way in. They reportedly broke in the door, without showing a warrant, had no clear legal justification to enter the home, and they still couldn’t detain the person. And once again, this is a blatant constitutional violation. The Fourth Amendment is not complicated… The home is supposed to be the most protected space in the country. Warrantless entry is supposed to be the exception, not something that happens because someone ran inside. “Chasing someone” does not automatically erase constitutional limits. And then, local police show up… say they didn’t know about a warrant, and were seen shaking hands with the federal agents afterward. That just shows you how normal this is becoming… ICE agents just violated the Constitution… broke into a home... And instead of anyone being held accountable, and facing consequences you or I would absolutely face for something like that… police show up and shake their hands. We’re watching “emergency justification” slowly turn into standard practice… and once that happens, constitutional protections stop meaning anything.

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents just illegally broke into another home without a judicial warrant, this time in Jersey city. Witnesses say they followed a man who ran inside a house, and instead of stopping there… they forced their way in. They reportedly broke in the door, without showing a warrant, had no clear legal justification to enter the home, and they still couldn’t detain the person. And once again, this is a blatant constitutional violation. The Fourth Amendment is not complicated… The home is supposed to be the most protected space in the country. Warrantless entry is supposed to be the exception, not something that happens because someone ran inside. “Chasing someone” does not automatically erase constitutional limits. And then, local police show up… say they didn’t know about a warrant, and were seen shaking hands with the federal agents afterward. That just shows you how normal this is becoming… ICE agents just violated the Constitution… broke into a home... And instead of anyone being held accountable, and facing consequences you or I would absolutely face for something like that… police show up and shake their hands. We’re watching “emergency justification” slowly turn into standard practice… and once that happens, constitutional protections stop meaning anything.

Jesus Freakin Congress

30,111 views • 4 months ago

During the debate on the Anti Paper Leak Bill in Parliament, while addressing Union Minister Shri Pralhad Joshi ji, Supriya Sule remarked that Parliament is “not some Karnataka Assembly where hasi mazak is going on.” This was not merely a political jibe. It was an affront to the dignity of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly, a constitutional institution that represents over 7 crore Kannadigas and has a proud democratic legacy. It is deeply ironic that the very Opposition which routinely lectures the nation about protecting institutions, federalism and constitutional values has no hesitation in belittling a State Legislature for the sake of scoring political points. Respect for democratic institutions cannot be selective or convenient. The INDIA alliance and the Congress owe the people of Karnataka an unconditional apology. Karnataka’s Assembly is not a punchline for Parliament debates. Every constitutional institution deserves equal respect, whether in Delhi or Bengaluru. BJP | BJP Karnataka | R. Ashoka | Chalavadi Narayanaswamy #Karnataka #Parliament #AntiPaperLeakBill

During the debate on the Anti Paper Leak Bill in Parliament, while addressing Union Minister Shri Pralhad Joshi ji, Supriya Sule remarked that Parliament is “not some Karnataka Assembly where hasi mazak is going on.” This was not merely a political jibe. It was an affront to the dignity of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly, a constitutional institution that represents over 7 crore Kannadigas and has a proud democratic legacy. It is deeply ironic that the very Opposition which routinely lectures the nation about protecting institutions, federalism and constitutional values has no hesitation in belittling a State Legislature for the sake of scoring political points. Respect for democratic institutions cannot be selective or convenient. The INDIA alliance and the Congress owe the people of Karnataka an unconditional apology. Karnataka’s Assembly is not a punchline for Parliament debates. Every constitutional institution deserves equal respect, whether in Delhi or Bengaluru. BJP | BJP Karnataka | R. Ashoka | Chalavadi Narayanaswamy #Karnataka #Parliament #AntiPaperLeakBill

Arvind Bellad

140,308 views • 1 month ago

The Zimbabwean Senate has voted in favour of the controversial Constitution Amendment Bill (No. 3) by 75 votes to 4, with one abstention. The opposition CCC, which has 27 senators in the 80-member chamber, voted alongside ZANUPF. The bill seeks to extend the presidential term from five years to seven years, provide for the future election of a president by Parliament rather than through a direct popular vote, and make a number of other far reaching constitutional changes. The vote means that the bill now awaits the signature of Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa before becoming law. Its passage marks one of the most significant constitutional changes in Zimbabwe’s recent history and is likely to remain the subject of intense political, legal and constitutional debate. The bill also seeks to allow Mnangagwa to influence the selection of his successor and potentially block his deputy, General Constantino Chiwenga, from succeeding him. If and when Mnangagwa signs it into law and there is no significant resistance from within ZANUPF, the military or broader society, it will signal a major setback to Chiwenga’s presidential ambitions, short of an intervention that changes the political landscape. More importantly, it will represent a further consolidation of ZANUPF’s hold on power and diminish the prospects of Zimbabwe having a president from outside the ruling party in the foreseeable future. The self evident story is how Mnangagwa has been assisted by influential business interests, including wealthy individuals aligned with ZANUPF, who may have more to lose from a Chiwenga presidency than from the continuation of the current political order. The only developments that could realistically halt this process would be a military intervention and a sustained national uprising. At present, however, all of these possibilities appear distant from political reality.

The Zimbabwean Senate has voted in favour of the controversial Constitution Amendment Bill (No. 3) by 75 votes to 4, with one abstention. The opposition CCC, which has 27 senators in the 80-member chamber, voted alongside ZANUPF. The bill seeks to extend the presidential term from five years to seven years, provide for the future election of a president by Parliament rather than through a direct popular vote, and make a number of other far reaching constitutional changes. The vote means that the bill now awaits the signature of Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa before becoming law. Its passage marks one of the most significant constitutional changes in Zimbabwe’s recent history and is likely to remain the subject of intense political, legal and constitutional debate. The bill also seeks to allow Mnangagwa to influence the selection of his successor and potentially block his deputy, General Constantino Chiwenga, from succeeding him. If and when Mnangagwa signs it into law and there is no significant resistance from within ZANUPF, the military or broader society, it will signal a major setback to Chiwenga’s presidential ambitions, short of an intervention that changes the political landscape. More importantly, it will represent a further consolidation of ZANUPF’s hold on power and diminish the prospects of Zimbabwe having a president from outside the ruling party in the foreseeable future. The self evident story is how Mnangagwa has been assisted by influential business interests, including wealthy individuals aligned with ZANUPF, who may have more to lose from a Chiwenga presidency than from the continuation of the current political order. The only developments that could realistically halt this process would be a military intervention and a sustained national uprising. At present, however, all of these possibilities appear distant from political reality.

Hopewell Chin’ono

99,129 views • 2 months ago

Kazakhs vote in superhero costumes and with a robot dog: turnout already at 51% In Astana and Almaty, voters are showing up to the constitutional referendum in unusual outfits. In Astana, a young woman arrived at a polling station wearing a white medical coat, house slippers, and accompanied by a robot dog. In Almaty, 18-year-old student Nursultan Dadyl cast his vote dressed as the social network Threads. Users who spend a lot of time on the platform joke that Threads has practically become a Kazakh social network because of the large number of users from Kazakhstan. “People on Threads like to argue under anonymous accounts, but real life is different. Instead of sitting on the couch and criticizing, I decided to come and vote,” the student explained. At other polling stations, voters dressed up as Superman, Iron Man, Captain America, and the Joker. Some even brought live birds with them. According to the Central Election Commission of Kazakhstan, by 14:00 local time 6,471,378 citizens had received ballots — 51.93% of the electorate, meaning the referendum is considered valid. The constitutional reform will be adopted if it receives the support of a majority of those who took part in the vote.

Kazakhs vote in superhero costumes and with a robot dog: turnout already at 51% In Astana and Almaty, voters are showing up to the constitutional referendum in unusual outfits. In Astana, a young woman arrived at a polling station wearing a white medical coat, house slippers, and accompanied by a robot dog. In Almaty, 18-year-old student Nursultan Dadyl cast his vote dressed as the social network Threads. Users who spend a lot of time on the platform joke that Threads has practically become a Kazakh social network because of the large number of users from Kazakhstan. “People on Threads like to argue under anonymous accounts, but real life is different. Instead of sitting on the couch and criticizing, I decided to come and vote,” the student explained. At other polling stations, voters dressed up as Superman, Iron Man, Captain America, and the Joker. Some even brought live birds with them. According to the Central Election Commission of Kazakhstan, by 14:00 local time 6,471,378 citizens had received ballots — 51.93% of the electorate, meaning the referendum is considered valid. The constitutional reform will be adopted if it receives the support of a majority of those who took part in the vote.

NEXTA

77,046 views • 5 months ago