Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The secret behind quantum search efficiency

3,241,785 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

34 Kommentare

Profilbild von Axel
Axelvor 7 Monaten

Why "quantum" tho? I'd just start a new thread every time I see a new path

Profilbild von Берлинский Олень
Берлинский Оленьvor 7 Monaten

It's called BFS and not quantum search 🤡

Profilbild von Dr. Md. Amir Khusru Akhtar
Dr. Md. Amir Khusru Akhtarvor 7 Monaten

It’s not faster because it runs harder — it’s faster because it lets the wrong answers cancel themselves.

Profilbild von Govind
Govindvor 7 Monaten

So grover's algorithm is basically Naruto using Shadow Clone Jutsu to search the whole forest at once, then cancels all clones except the one that found the ramen?

Profilbild von Moravyalı
Moravyalıvor 7 Monaten

That's parallel computing and it's not faster than Dijkstra in terms of computational complexity.

Profilbild von Aanshul Sadaria
Aanshul Sadariavor 7 Monaten

Why does this look like BFS?

Profilbild von Hawkeye
Hawkeyevor 7 Monaten

So slime mold is a biological quantum search? It searches all possible pathways, and then reinforces only the shortest path branches that have found food.

Profilbild von Rex⚡Volt
Rex⚡Voltvor 7 Monaten

The improbability drive has arrived.

Profilbild von Pat the Irishman
Pat the Irishmanvor 7 Monaten

And this is why your binary passwords are worthless against quantum computers

Profilbild von Smit
Smitvor 7 Monaten

I think it'll also help people to understand quantum computing:

Profilbild von TUVegeto137
TUVegeto137vor 7 Monaten

You make it look like quantum computing is just parallel computing. It's not.

Profilbild von 𝓛𝓪𝓾𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓸
𝓛𝓪𝓾𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓸vor 7 Monaten

Seems like a thread

Profilbild von MrBlindMouse
MrBlindMousevor 7 Monaten

So its just an async Breadth-First search?

Profilbild von Rahul
Rahulvor 7 Monaten

Grover's algorithm is fascinating because it achieves quadratic speedup over classical search - O(√N) vs O(N). But the real challenge isn't the algorithm, it's maintaining quantum coherence long enough to run it at scale. Quantum error correction is the bottleneck we're solving now.

Profilbild von Lukas Süss
Lukas Süssvor 7 Monaten

@sciencegirl — Not true or at least misleading. Quantum comuting is still strictly less powerful compared to true parallel computing due to the random sampling constraint. (Ignoring physical impossibility of such parallelism.)

Profilbild von Δημήτρης Βουζουναράς
Δημήτρης Βουζουναράςvor 7 Monaten

Nothing to do with... quantum anything... The one is a linear pathfinder, while the second is a multi-threaded one, creating a new thread (job, worker) for any possible new path, killing it when it arrives to a dead-end. Quantum computing is still a myth.

Profilbild von Jason Dadness
Jason Dadnessvor 7 Monaten

@grok is this a good description of quantum computing?

Profilbild von Hemant
Hemantvor 7 Monaten

So classical computers panic, quantum computers just vibe and arrive.

Profilbild von ItsBS
ItsBSvor 7 Monaten

Quantum Computing is fake. Quantum State Superposition is a lie. Don't be fooled, like so many others, because this idea of "parallelism" has already been proven false in experiments. Classical superposition of the wavefunction exists, but Born's ad-hoc "probabilities" do not.

Profilbild von Craig Swann - model citizen, zero discipline
Craig Swann - model citizen, zero disciplinevor 7 Monaten

I've yet to find an explanation of how a bit being a 1 and 0 simultaneously, is useful.

Profilbild von AWeirdRobot
AWeirdRobotvor 7 Monaten

Wrong

Profilbild von Anthony Schmitt
Anthony Schmittvor 7 Monaten

Stop searching like it's 2020. Classical linear search is officially a bottleneck for Big Data. The future? Quadratic speedup. Grover’s Algorithm isn't just theory—it’s the new strategic edge for 2026.👇 #QuantumComputing #Algorithm #DeepTech @sciencegirl

Profilbild von Miggy Ferrero Rocher
Miggy Ferrero Rochervor 7 Monaten

Like, oh my gawd, nooo way, that's totally not correct, duh! 🙄

Profilbild von Ludic labs
Ludic labsvor 7 Monaten

The real magic isn’t speed. It’s exploring better paths before committing to one.

Profilbild von MoroAI
MoroAIvor 7 Monaten

Why not look at it from above recognize where the exit is and then take the best path

Profilbild von G Labs
G Labsvor 7 Monaten

This quantum search method for solving mazes looks like a backwards version of the Dead End Filling Algorithm, where false paths are colored in starting from dead ends, leaving the correct path revealed. Here's my mini lecture and demonstration of it:

Profilbild von Elena_ The HumanistPoet
Elena_ The HumanistPoetvor 7 Monaten

I need an agent to navigate my life. Best path forward please.

Profilbild von Ben
Benvor 7 Monaten

A* algorithm entered the chat. If you're out here solving mazes by trying every goddamn dead-end like a drunk toddler with a death wish... congrats, you've discovered the slowest, most soul-crushing way possible. Real maze algorithms don't wander around like lost tourists.

Profilbild von Steve Nicklin
Steve Nicklinvor 7 Monaten

I might be wrong but is the same approach that CHIP (Constraint Handling in Prolog) took in the 1980's (yes you read that right 1980's!) Try Quantum Search against the 8 Queens Problem on a 64x64 chess board and see if it is as quick!

Profilbild von Göktuğ
Göktuğvor 7 Monaten

This algorithm is not entirely suitable for parallelization. Some agents may have to follow the path for a very long time, which actually makes the algorithm inefficient to run both on CPU and GPU.

Profilbild von Hold this L~
Hold this L~vor 7 Monaten

if quantum can search at multiple path in the same time, why cant normal search just go multiple path search too?

Profilbild von SereneLoop
SereneLoopvor 7 Monaten

Wow thats great fo you that you know about quantum search efficiency

Profilbild von Potato
Potatovor 7 Monaten

It's called BFS, and it's computationally heady in space. You're trading memory for time, as always. There is no miracle solutions.

Profilbild von Cloud.
Cloud.vor 7 Monaten

And that's exactly how we humans are built in multiple universes.

Ähnliche Videos