Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The secret behind quantum search efficiency

3,241,785 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

34 Comments

Axel's profile picture
Axel7 months ago

Why "quantum" tho? I'd just start a new thread every time I see a new path

Берлинский Олень's profile picture
Берлинский Олень7 months ago

It's called BFS and not quantum search 🤡

Dr. Md. Amir Khusru Akhtar's profile picture
Dr. Md. Amir Khusru Akhtar7 months ago

It’s not faster because it runs harder — it’s faster because it lets the wrong answers cancel themselves.

Govind's profile picture
Govind7 months ago

So grover's algorithm is basically Naruto using Shadow Clone Jutsu to search the whole forest at once, then cancels all clones except the one that found the ramen?

Moravyalı's profile picture
Moravyalı7 months ago

That's parallel computing and it's not faster than Dijkstra in terms of computational complexity.

Aanshul Sadaria's profile picture
Aanshul Sadaria7 months ago

Why does this look like BFS?

Hawkeye's profile picture
Hawkeye7 months ago

So slime mold is a biological quantum search? It searches all possible pathways, and then reinforces only the shortest path branches that have found food.

Rex⚡Volt's profile picture
Rex⚡Volt7 months ago

The improbability drive has arrived.

Pat the Irishman's profile picture
Pat the Irishman7 months ago

And this is why your binary passwords are worthless against quantum computers

Smit's profile picture
Smit7 months ago

I think it'll also help people to understand quantum computing:

TUVegeto137's profile picture
TUVegeto1377 months ago

You make it look like quantum computing is just parallel computing. It's not.

𝓛𝓪𝓾𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓸's profile picture
𝓛𝓪𝓾𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓷𝓸7 months ago

Seems like a thread

MrBlindMouse's profile picture
MrBlindMouse7 months ago

So its just an async Breadth-First search?

Rahul's profile picture
Rahul7 months ago

Grover's algorithm is fascinating because it achieves quadratic speedup over classical search - O(√N) vs O(N). But the real challenge isn't the algorithm, it's maintaining quantum coherence long enough to run it at scale. Quantum error correction is the bottleneck we're solving now.

Lukas Süss's profile picture
Lukas Süss7 months ago

@sciencegirl — Not true or at least misleading. Quantum comuting is still strictly less powerful compared to true parallel computing due to the random sampling constraint. (Ignoring physical impossibility of such parallelism.)

Δημήτρης Βουζουναράς's profile picture
Δημήτρης Βουζουναράς7 months ago

Nothing to do with... quantum anything... The one is a linear pathfinder, while the second is a multi-threaded one, creating a new thread (job, worker) for any possible new path, killing it when it arrives to a dead-end. Quantum computing is still a myth.

Jason Dadness's profile picture
Jason Dadness7 months ago

@grok is this a good description of quantum computing?

Hemant's profile picture
Hemant7 months ago

So classical computers panic, quantum computers just vibe and arrive.

ItsBS's profile picture
ItsBS7 months ago

Quantum Computing is fake. Quantum State Superposition is a lie. Don't be fooled, like so many others, because this idea of "parallelism" has already been proven false in experiments. Classical superposition of the wavefunction exists, but Born's ad-hoc "probabilities" do not.

Craig Swann - model citizen, zero discipline's profile picture
Craig Swann - model citizen, zero discipline7 months ago

I've yet to find an explanation of how a bit being a 1 and 0 simultaneously, is useful.

AWeirdRobot's profile picture
AWeirdRobot7 months ago

Wrong

Anthony Schmitt's profile picture
Anthony Schmitt7 months ago

Stop searching like it's 2020. Classical linear search is officially a bottleneck for Big Data. The future? Quadratic speedup. Grover’s Algorithm isn't just theory—it’s the new strategic edge for 2026.👇 #QuantumComputing #Algorithm #DeepTech @sciencegirl

Miggy Ferrero Rocher's profile picture
Miggy Ferrero Rocher7 months ago

Like, oh my gawd, nooo way, that's totally not correct, duh! 🙄

Ludic labs's profile picture
Ludic labs7 months ago

The real magic isn’t speed. It’s exploring better paths before committing to one.

MoroAI's profile picture
MoroAI7 months ago

Why not look at it from above recognize where the exit is and then take the best path

G Labs's profile picture
G Labs7 months ago

This quantum search method for solving mazes looks like a backwards version of the Dead End Filling Algorithm, where false paths are colored in starting from dead ends, leaving the correct path revealed. Here's my mini lecture and demonstration of it:

Elena_ The HumanistPoet's profile picture
Elena_ The HumanistPoet7 months ago

I need an agent to navigate my life. Best path forward please.

Ben's profile picture
Ben7 months ago

A* algorithm entered the chat. If you're out here solving mazes by trying every goddamn dead-end like a drunk toddler with a death wish... congrats, you've discovered the slowest, most soul-crushing way possible. Real maze algorithms don't wander around like lost tourists.

Steve Nicklin's profile picture
Steve Nicklin7 months ago

I might be wrong but is the same approach that CHIP (Constraint Handling in Prolog) took in the 1980's (yes you read that right 1980's!) Try Quantum Search against the 8 Queens Problem on a 64x64 chess board and see if it is as quick!

Göktuğ's profile picture
Göktuğ7 months ago

This algorithm is not entirely suitable for parallelization. Some agents may have to follow the path for a very long time, which actually makes the algorithm inefficient to run both on CPU and GPU.

Hold this L~'s profile picture
Hold this L~7 months ago

if quantum can search at multiple path in the same time, why cant normal search just go multiple path search too?

SereneLoop's profile picture
SereneLoop7 months ago

Wow thats great fo you that you know about quantum search efficiency

Potato's profile picture
Potato7 months ago

It's called BFS, and it's computationally heady in space. You're trading memory for time, as always. There is no miracle solutions.

Cloud.'s profile picture
Cloud.7 months ago

And that's exactly how we humans are built in multiple universes.

Related Videos