The SEC’s proposed changes to tick sizes will reduce liquidity, create less stable prices and increase costs for investors. We laid out an alternative approach—watch the full conversation:

We’ll just leave this here again: You know, to open a dialogue about your role in our hopefully transparent, fair, competitive and efficient markets.

#PFOF must go! Didn’t Ken Grifting say it’s a cost for him? Well, retail investors support the SEC’s proposed changes to tick sizes to help Citadel eliminate the cost of #PFOF. No one wants Citadel & Ken Grifting near their money. We’ll send you where you belong: Federal prison!

You people will find your way to prison, we don’t care how long it takes, what politicians need to be replaced. We WILL put every last one of you in prison. We don’t care if you leave the organization, if you worked for Citadel during this time of unl fraud we are coming for you

Better title - Racketeers explain why they don't want changes to their racket.

Bro - Your crimes has been exposed.. nobody trust you anymore. Your manipulation in the dark pool though PFOF, FTD's, options manipulation. .. Sorry Bro.. - you have lost all credibility...

L I E

@dlauer @WeTheInvestors_ there seems to be a well coordinated propaganda campaign being put together about the SEC’s proposal for the tick rules. 👀

1. You don’t speak for Retail Investors. 2. Retail Investors will never trust your approach towards anything. 3. 🖕

You pay fines for market manipulation and call it the cost of doing business. You manipulate price discovery and naked short in the name of liquidity. Citadel have a hedge fund which is a conflict of interest as they also are a market maker. You are front running the list goes on