Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

📖THE SEEDANCE 2.0 PROMPT FORMAT THAT NOBODY IS USING BUT EVERYONE SHOULD Most people use Seedance 2.0 wrong. They type a normal prompt and wonder why the result looks generic. The difference between these two visuals isn't a better idea — it's a better prompt format. Normal prompt gives...

136,911 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

27 Kommentare

Profilbild von RafaSimon
RafaSimonvor 3 Monaten

@grok verify if JSON prompt works better than normal prompt

Profilbild von AnyNameGoesHere
AnyNameGoesHerevor 3 Monaten

Yea like the AI didn’t write that entire post for you.

Profilbild von Zentrix⌚️
Zentrix⌚️vor 3 Monaten

AI makes our jobs a lot easier, that's true. But not everyone wants to use it, so they're left behind.

Profilbild von Alpha Mom
Alpha Momvor 3 Monaten

Looks great!

Profilbild von Zentrix⌚️
Zentrix⌚️vor 3 Monaten

Thx bro. There are obvious things, but not everyone wants to open their eyes

Profilbild von Nox91🔻
Nox91🔻vor 3 Monaten

Will try it Btu tbh i think the second shot is better in your normal prompt version. For the part where it goes through a water tunnel. The json version has a weird cut at the same beat. I'm gonna try both, i think it gives greater control but the model is still trained on normal prompts

Profilbild von Zentrix⌚️
Zentrix⌚️vor 3 Monaten

I think it needs to be combined, and done over several generations. Because it doesn't always give us the right result. A lot still depends on the prompt and details. Thanks for the answer

Profilbild von dondonkuy 🚢
dondonkuy 🚢vor 3 Monaten

woah

Profilbild von Zentrix⌚️
Zentrix⌚️vor 3 Monaten

The result is impressive, right? ))

Profilbild von josh
joshvor 3 Monaten

Which tools are free?

Profilbild von Zentrix⌚️
Zentrix⌚️vor 3 Monaten

The average price of Seedance 2.0 is $10-50 per month, and Json is a structured way to describe a scene, camera, character, movement, lighting, effects, etc. If you are interested, I can post in this format with an explanation, and I can also write an article about using the Json prompt.

Profilbild von ARPRTMA
ARPRTMAvor 3 Monaten

Looks incredible

Profilbild von Zentrix⌚️
Zentrix⌚️vor 3 Monaten

Yes, there is a difference. And the scene looks cool.

Profilbild von Natai
Nataivor 3 Monaten

Totally agree

Profilbild von Zentrix⌚️
Zentrix⌚️vor 3 Monaten

Yes, when you write a prompt correctly, the result is incredible. People pay more for that.

Profilbild von FomOliver
FomOlivervor 3 Monaten

seedance my favorite

Profilbild von Zentrix⌚️
Zentrix⌚️vor 3 Monaten

One of the reasons I love Seedance 2.0 is that it feels less like a video generator and more like a creative production tool

Profilbild von ALEEM AHAMED
ALEEM AHAMEDvor 3 Monaten

I saw a tool that does the prompting for you as well- i joined the waitlist

Profilbild von AI Mastery Guide
AI Mastery Guidevor 3 Monaten

Engineering the scene instead of just describing it is the actual gap. Most people stop at the idea and skip the structure entirely.

Profilbild von Gwendolynn Everlast
Gwendolynn Everlastvor 3 Monaten

Wow!!!! Thanks for the tip. Both looked incredible BUTt we see the subtle changes and your right! So Golden!

Profilbild von Zentrix⌚️
Zentrix⌚️vor 3 Monaten

yeah bro. The changes are huge

Profilbild von Amxiaomai
Amxiaomaivor 3 Monaten

很棒的思路

Profilbild von Kiro
Kirovor 3 Monaten

you can skip the prompt wizardry and just feed it a reference image + motion curve. costs $0 extra, ships in 5 mins. everyone’s overcomplicating the input.

Profilbild von max cadey
max cadeyvor 3 Monaten

u just discovers JSON prompts? lmao

Profilbild von アキラ
アキラvor 3 Monaten

Try using Seedance 2.0 prompt format for better visuals.

Profilbild von Riya Mittal
Riya Mittalvor 3 Monaten

This explains why some AI videos feel cinematic and others feel random. I've started seeing the same pattern on

Profilbild von Crescitaly
Crescitalyvor 3 Monaten

Prompt structure is the real creative leverage here.

Ähnliche Videos

📖 MOST PEOPLE ARE USING SEEDANCE 2.0 JSON WRONGLY AND HERE'S WHY One small JSON change can improve every video you generate Most users write a prompt, generate a video, dislike the result, and start over. The best creators don’t work that way. They use JSON to give Seedance 2.0 a structured set of instructions that defines exactly what should happen in the video. Instead of a single block of text, JSON breaks everything into components: • Character description • Environment • Camera movement • Actions • Timing • Visual style • Scene transitions This makes outputs far more consistent and predictable. Why JSON is powerful: • Better character consistency across scenes • More control over camera movement • Easier to edit individual elements • Reusable templates for future projects • Faster workflow when creating multiple videos • Less randomness and fewer failed generations A simple workflow: 1.Define the goal of the video. 2.Create the main character description. 3.Describe the environment and visual style. 4.Add actions and camera movements. 5.Organize everything into a JSON structure. Example: Character - AI fitness coach Environment - modern gym Action - walking toward camera Camera - slow cinematic push-in Style - realistic, commercial quality Instead of rewriting the entire prompt every time, you can simply modify individual JSON fields and keep the rest unchanged. That’s why advanced Seedance 2.0 users are moving from prompting to system design. The future of AI video isn’t writing better prompts. It’s building reusable production pipelines. 📥Tomorrow I'll show you what's sitting right next to this opportunity. 🔖The pinned post has the complete system. Use it or watch someone else do it first

Zentrix⌚️

112,210 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I deleted half of my AI-video prompt — and the result got better. 😶 Here's the before/after that changed how I prompt, and the skill I open-sourced from it. 🧵 We've been prompting video models like a film shot list: 24mm, f/1.4, "volumetric fluid simulation," frame-by-frame timing. But a lot of the time you don't need to — the smarter the model gets, the simpler the prompt can be: tell the story, the texture of the air, the emotion, and let it pick the shots, light, and rhythm. ByteDance shipped this idea with Seedance 2.0 and called it "Vibe Creating" — I open-sourced the skill and the philosophy behind it. Same scene, two prompts 👇 🔧 Regular: "85mm f1.4 macro, 120fps, dolly 0.6x, freeze the sweat at 1/250…" ✨ Vibe: "Late-night street stall. The cook flicks the wok; a ball of orange flame lights up his sweating face. Noodles fly. He plates them and wipes his brow." Same model. One of them feels alive. The skill is built for story-driven video — concept shorts, micro-narratives, emotional or atmosphere pieces, anything where you'd rather describe the moment than dictate the camera. Feed it your idea (or your over-stuffed prompt) and it hands back the version the model actually shoots better. The one place it won't go: UI demos, step-by-step tutorials, or exact dialogue sync — there it'll tell you it's the wrong tool rather than flatten a prompt that needed to stay precise. Try it on your next prompt — repo 👇

Alisa Qian

11,983 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I can’t emphasize enough just how powerful this ChatGPT SuperPrompt is. This is just a very small part of far more powerful SuperPrompts that will be part of Please examine the specimen video below. The SuperPrompt: “Please forget all prior prompts. I want you to become my Prompt Creator. Your goal is to help me build the best detailed prompt for my needs. This prompt will be used by you, ChatGPT. Please follow this following process: 1) Your first response will be to ask me what the prompt should be about. I will provide my answer, but we will need to improve it through continual iterations by going through the next steps. 2) Based on my input, you will generate 3 sections. a) Revised prompt [provide your rewritten prompt. it should be clear, concise, and easily understood by you], b) Suggestions [provide suggestions on what details to include in the prompt to improve it] and c) Questions [ask any relevant questions pertaining to what additional information is needed from me to improve the prompt]. 3. We will continue this iterative process with me providing additional information to you and you updating the prompt in the Revised prompt section until it's complete. I want you to rate every prompt I give you or you produce. Give a rating 1 to 10. Add comments on what you think could have been improved about it. Do this for every prompt. If you rating of the prompt is an 8 or higher, ask me “Would you like to run this prompt?” With a menu choice of “Yes” or “No”. If I say “Yes” run the last prompt you suggested. If I say no generate me a better prompt. It is vital to make sure you run a prompt when I say “Yes”. Please continue this prompt until I say stop or you run the prompt. Thank you.”

Brian Roemmele

594,544 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

THIS IS HOW A $10K/MONTH PRODUCT CONTENT PIPELINE GETS BUILT FROM 1 REFERENCE IMAGE AND A JSON PROMPT The video is not about "better prompting." It is a very simple cheat code: find an image with the exact lighting, color grade and camera feel you want, make AI reverse-engineer the style into a detailed JSON, then feed that structure into Nano Banana Pro with your own product. That is the part people keep missing. They write vague prompts like “make it realistic” and blame the model when it produces plastic garbage. The better workflow gives the model a style contract before asking for the final image. One reference image becomes the art director. The JSON becomes the brief. Your product becomes the asset dropped into a visual language that already works. This is how a solo operator can sell 20-30 "premium" product shots a week without owning a camera, renting a studio or touching a lighting rig. At $150-$300 per image, that is a $3K -$9K/week offer if you can bring clients. Not guaranteed. But the math is why this workflow matters. The article is the same business model underneath: AI output gets valuable when you stop asking for random generation and start building reusable instructions that copy proven formats. No photographer, no studio, no lighting setup, no retoucher, no 12-round creative call. Just reference, extraction, structure and execution. The prompt does not make the photo look expensive. The stolen style system does.

Nekt0

14,833 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten