Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨 The Set-Piece Evolution: Liverpool engineered it. Arsenal WEAPONISED it. Under Klopp, Liverpool redefined the Premier League’s relationship with set pieces precision, spacing, rehearsed movement, attacking zones rather than bodies. It was the first time elite sides had 'consistently' taken it seriously and demonstrated mastery. But since 2021, Arsenal...

233,833 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 Regarding Croatia's disallowed goal, this "super slow-motion" replay shows that the ball was indeed almost certainly touched by Matanović—at the very least, a graze of the hair. We can obviously question the "spirit" of how the rules are applied here, but since technology allows us to detect even the slightest micro-touch of the ball, we might as well use it. 🤯 HOWEVER, the main aspect of this decision to analyze is the subsequent header deflection by Veiga. Indeed, two questions arise here (in relation to the Laws of the Game): - Was it a "deliberate play" on his part or not ? If it is deliberate, he plays the Croatian player behind him onside. If it is not, offside should be called. - Was it a save ? (i.e., "preventing or attempting to prevent the ball from going into or very close to the goal"). If it is a save, then offside must be called. According to the Laws of the Game: "The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player had control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have 'deliberately played' the ball: - The ball had travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it; - The ball was not moving quickly; - The direction of the ball was not unexpected; - The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control; - A ball on the ground is much easier to play than a ball in the air." We are therefore in the realm of pure referee interpretation. While waiting for our referees' analysis, my personal view is that the ball's trajectory was absolutely not altered by Matanović's "hair". Therefore, Veiga made a deliberate play, as he had time to coordinate his movement to head the ball. Furthermore, since the ball was not heading towards the goal, it cannot be considered a save. Consequently, he would have played the Croatian player behind him (Pašalić) onside. HNS Portugal #WC2026 #Refereeing

Check VAR World Cup

74,312 views • 13 days ago

Got it. Watch every facet of this play carefully. >>Martinelli did well to win a header and Gyökeres was already on the run. >>Gyökeres gets to the ball first and it took THREE defenders to get the ball off him. FIVE markers were forced to drop deep. >>From the ensuing chaos, the ball is cleared to Ødegaard, who lays it for A Rice in the area just outside the penalty area (usually the most dangerous area of the pitch) >>Why is that space not occupied by anyone? Because they've all been dragged back due to Gyökeres run and tussling for the ball. There are two main takeaways from this: 1. This is actually an effective way to envision HavertzxGyökeres setups. Havertz wins the aerial duel and Gyökeres runs into the ball. If he is able to shoot, he scores. If not, there is enough chaos that it allows us to get opportunities. 2. Arteta said he told Gyökeres that he wants a striker who can go 7 to 8 games without scoring and still have the mentality to not break down and not fight for the ball. Arteta himself said that, which means Gyökeres' value to Arteta goes beyond goals. I want him to score more like anyone else, but honestly, to Arteta, that is not the priority. The priority is that the team wins. We've now won 39 points out of 13 games that Gyökeres has played in since the City match. Not a single point dropped. G.Jesus is also not physically ready for the Out Of Possession (OOP) work Arteta requires of his striker. Havertz will be returning from injury, so we have to be patient with him. He is a net positive for the team, this is factual. But it doesn't matter what I say because your preconceived notions won't change. Arsenal fans have a hard-on for attacking our own. If it's not Gabriel, it's Havertz, then Ødegaard. Now, it's Gyökeres.

Uzumaki Tony

306,889 views • 6 months ago

🗣️Shall we begin: Announcing protest Arsenal 9th March We have been preparing for this for a few weeks in anticipation. We are angry, the fans are angry and it’s been building for some time. We have all been more than patient. We all know the root cause, we have always known the elephant in the room. Yet, this isn’t being addressed. It’s those who can least afford it, have the most emotional connection with our club who are being asked to pay the price in more ways than one. Trampling over generational support and memories of friends and family who handed the club over to us like something they have stepped in. - The treatment of fans from the club - The eradication of fan culture - The assault on concessions and generational fans - Putting profit before fan safety - Putting profit before everything - The total lack of communication and transparency - The uncertainty of our clubs future The club preach fan engagement the reality is they dont practice it. We know this first hand and have evidence. ACTIONS NOT WORDS ITS NOT GOOD ENOUGH They can hold meetings with the FAB which is all under NDA. It is supposed to be for the fans YET they can’t tell the fans anything. It’s a disgrace! These meetings are effectively gagged and it is NOT open and transparent dialogue with fans. Not even close. The silence from the club is deafening. We rise again to defend our club and be warned this will not just be on the street campaigns at the ground. Keep treating the fans with contempt at your peril More details to follow in the coming days The 1958 🇾🇪

The 1958

909,064 views • 1 year ago

Vincent Kompany has gone out of his own pocket to raise Bayern’s training standards, arranging for a couple of FORZA Alu110 Freestanding Stadium Box Goals in full FIFA size (7.32m × 2.44m) to be brought to Säbener Straße, each costing around €3,000 (£2,600). These goals are the standard across Europe’s elite clubs, built with solid aluminium frames and supported by back stanchions that extend backwards. The ratchet system keeps the net under constant tension, creating a bright white box that remains crystal clear from every angle. Every strike snaps back with energy, giving players the sharp feedback they expect, and the corners and target zones are immediately visible for strikers working on precision finishing. Bayern had still been relying on the same old red and grey straight back goals for nearly twenty years. The nets sagged, the colours blurred the frame, the ball simply died inside the mesh, and the target zones were difficult to see. For finishing drills this meant less precision and less realism, and several senior players voiced their dissatisfaction. Harry Kane and Michael Olise in particular made their feelings clear to Kompany, both of them used to the modern box net setups that have been standard across Premier League training grounds for years. They were unimpressed by how outdated the Bayern equipment looked and felt compared to what they had left behind in England, and Kompany shared their frustration. The board, however, dismissed the need for new goals as an unnecessary expense, while Kompany saw them as a crucial detail that directly influences the sharpness of training and the standards within the squad. So, by paying for the new goals himself, Kompany ensured Bayern finally trained with the same professional box-net equipment long routine at Europe’s elite clubs. Nevertheless, the rest of the training ground remains heavily outdated, with rusty fittings, worn-down surfaces, and facilities that resemble a second-division setup rather than the home of a supposed European powerhouse.

Bayern Space

1,129,737 views • 10 months ago

⭕️ Breaking | Axios cites a senior Israeli official as saying the Israeli government “thinks Hamas is holding between seven to ten bodies of hostages that it can return at any minute. They choose not to do it and are creating a crisis.” The official offered no explanation for why the Palestinian resistance would seek to provoke a new crisis—one that would only invite more attacks and civilian deaths—or what possible benefit they would gain from withholding the remains. ▪️For its part, Hamas in an official statement yesterday, said: “The return of the bodies of the Israeli captives may take some time, as some were buried in tunnels destroyed by the occupation, while others remain under the rubble of buildings it bombed and demolished. The same Nazi occupation army that killed these captives is the one that caused them to be buried beneath the debris. The bodies of the Israeli captives that the Resistance was able to retrieve have already been handed over. Extracting the remaining bodies requires equipment and machinery to remove the rubble — which are currently unavailable because the occupation prevents their entry. Therefore, any delay in handing over the bodies is the sole responsibility of Netanyahu’s government, which obstructs and prevents the provision of the necessary means for recovery.” ▪️ Earlier in the week, PIJ deputy secretary-general Mohammed al-Hindi also rejected the Israeli accusations, saying: “Israel knows that locating the bodies will take time; it is not something solved under pressure or in a few days. It requires time and equipment. The mediators have been informed and are convinced of that, and even the enemy knows the delay is not intentional. As I said — what benefit would we gain from hiding the remains of the dead? None whatsoever.” ▪️U.S. officials have also disputed the claim. Washington denied that Hamas had violated the ceasefire deal, stressing that the process of recovering bodies from Gaza was expected to take time given the scale of destruction. “We’ve heard a lot of people saying, ‘Hamas violated the deal, because not all the bodies have been returned.’ The understanding we had with them was we get all the live hostages out, which they did honor that,” said a senior adviser to President Trump. “Right now, we have a mechanism in place where we’re working closely with mediators… to do our best to get as many bodies out as possible,” he added. “We continue to give [the mediators] the intelligence that the Israelis have [on where bodies may be located] and we keep working in good faith until we are able to exhaust that mechanism.” Another senior adviser to Trump said, “Hamas did the right thing when they gave all of the 20 live hostages up at the same time. That was a big moment.” He added that recovery efforts only began once the ceasefire took effect. “The amount of debris in Gaza dwarfs what was left after the World Trade Center was bombed on 9/11,” the adviser continued. “On top of all that debris is a lot of unexploded ordnance, and presumably, under that… there are many bodies.” “It would have been almost impossible for Hamas — even if they knew where all the 28 bodies were — to mobilize and get them all,” he said. “First we got three. Then we got four. Then we got another four.” “The sentiment in Israel is always [that Hamas] can do more,” the first adviser said. “What we basically say to the Israeli side… is, ‘Give us whatever intelligence you’re hearing or seeing… If you think that there’s something [the mediators or Hamas] could be doing or should be doing that you don’t think they’re doing, then pass it over and we’ll convey it,’” he told reporters. Still, Netanyahu and Israeli officials continue to insist the delay is deliberate. 🎥 Video from comra shows large-scale excavation project underway in Gaza to dig for bodies of Israeli prisoners and captives.

Drop Site

239,192 views • 9 months ago

This is another relatively well known USAAF B-17 interception by a Luftwaffe fighter that is worth looking at in some detail. There are no archival descriptions that I can find identifying personnel, date or location involved but much can be gleaned from the footage itself. The bomber being targeted lacks the chin turret that was specifically installed on the G model of the B-17 to counter this sort of frontal attack, identifying it as an F model. Tracers from the attacking aircraft come from both sides of the frame suggesting that the gun camera is mounted in the nose of a twin-engined aircraft, such as a Messerschmitt Bf 110 or Me 410 It is often speculated that the Luftwaffe fighter here is attacking through its own flak but it is more likely that the explosions visible are the result of the Werfer-Granate 21 rocket launcher being employed. Flak bursts usually had a distinctive shape and ground fire would typically cease when friendly fighters were attacking. The rockets were set to detonate after traveling a fixed distance of around 600 meters and while the chances of scoring a direct hit were low, their 40 kg blast-fragmentation warheads were effective in breaking up the "combat box" formation and therefore making individual bombers more vulnerable to attack. In this case however, it appears the attacking aircraft have misjudged their timing and the rockets are detonating behind the formation. This was one of the disadvantages of attacking frontally as approach speeds made targeting more of a challenge, however it was also a way of avoiding the majority of the bomber's defensive firepower. Another consideration often ignored is the effect that a head-on attack would have on projectile effectiveness. At full speed a B-17 would be traveling at around 125 meters per second, if it had to simply fly into a stationary 20mm armor piercing shell weighing 115 grams the impact energy would be 900 joules. This is significantly greater than most .45 ACP pistol rounds fired at point blank range, only from the motion of the aircraft. The speed of the attacking aircraft at the moment the projectile is fired can also be added to the muzzle velocity making for an even more devastating impact. This was of course a double-edged sword as it meant defensive fire would be similarly more effective on the attacking aircraft, and it also gave the pilot a smaller time window during which he could fire and a more complex firing solution to calculate, not to mention the increased risk of a mid-air collision. As a general rule, Luftwaffe pilots were instructed not to waste time setting up an attack from a particular angle, rather they should attack the bomber formation from whatever position it would be encountered. In this particular incident, most of the impacts are around the number 3 and 4 engines on the B-17. While air-cooled radials were more damage-resistant than liquid-cooled engines, from this angle they would not have been protected by the aircraft structure. While there is no immediate fire visible, it's likely they would both have been put out of action. Armor piercing shells would typically represent around a third of the ammunition loadout and for the MG 151/20 cannon such projectiles could penetrate almost an inch of armor at 100 meters, therefore punching through a cylinder or crankcase would not be an issue. There is also one particular projectile that appears to strike the cockpit followed by an explosion near the horizontal tail. It almost seems like a shell entered the windshield then detonated inside, however I believe this is an optical illusion and they are in fact two separate impacts. The damage inflicted would likely have prevented the bomber from returning to base although there is nothing in the clip that would allow the aircraft to be identified. One interesting detail is that other Flying Fortresses in the formation appear to be fitted with chin turrets which would date the footage to between late 1943 to early 1944.

hw97karbine

128,425 views • 8 months ago

The SPLC story just entered a different phase... for years, the organization stood at the center of the extremism narrative, helping shape who was considered acceptable, who was considered dangerous, and who deserved access to the financial and digital infrastructure of modern society... Now federal prosecutors have charged the SPLC with wire fraud, bank fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering... allegations that cut directly against the image it spent decades building... What makes this so significant is not simply the charges themselves... it is what they imply... The same system that claimed authority to identify, track, and expose extremism now stands accused of funding, infiltrating, and benefiting from the very ecosystem it claimed to be fighting... That is why this story extends far beyond one organization... For years, NGOs, corporate censorship networks, financial deplatforming systems, media amplification, and narrative enforcement mechanisms have operated as a connected ecosystem... the SPLC became one of the most visible nodes inside that structure... Now that node is under criminal scrutiny... when one piece of a system begins to crack, attention naturally shifts to the connections, the relationships, the funding streams, and the institutions surrounding it... The SPLC is not the destination... it is the first visible fracture in a much larger architecture... quite literally, AI helped map the entire Fraud Industrial Complex... watch the video... The narrative protected the system... the receipts are exposing it... more below...

Observing Consciousness

12,397 views • 1 month ago

Dario Amodei just revealed the exact realization that fractured OpenAI. It happened while building the most powerful AI in the world. The team discovered that scaling had no ceiling. Amodei: “If you pour more compute into these models, they’ll get better and better, and that there’s almost no end to this.” At the time, almost nobody believed it. Amodei’s group were among the first to see it clearly. More compute meant more intelligence. Indefinitely. Without limit. That should have been the most exciting discovery in the history of technology. It terrified them. Because they saw the second half of the equation the industry was ignoring entirely. Amodei: “You don’t tell the models what their values are just by pouring more compute into them.” Intelligence scales with compute. Values don’t. You can build a mind of unlimited capability and it will have no moral compass unless you deliberately build one in. Not as a feature. Not as a guardrail bolted on at the end. As the foundation the entire system is constructed on. This wasn’t a philosophical disagreement. It was an existential one. A god-like intelligence with no alignment isn’t a powerful tool. It’s an uncontrolled force with no reason to care about the species that built it. Amodei: “There were a set of people who believed in those two ideas. We really trusted each other and wanted to work together, and so we went off and started our own company with that idea in mind.” They walked out of the most powerful AI lab on earth. Not for better funding. Not for equity. Because they believed the path OpenAI was on led somewhere nobody could walk back from. That small group became Anthropic. Safety wasn’t a feature they added. It was the entire reason the company exists. The intelligence is going to keep scaling. There is almost no end to it. The only question that has ever mattered is what it’s pointing at when it gets there.

Dustin

52,414 views • 4 months ago

🔴 Viktor Gyökeres reflects on the sacrifices behind becoming an Arsenal champion 🗣️ "I always dreamed of playing for a big club. From the early days, that was the goal - to test myself at the highest level." 🗣️ "The early years in England were tough. Brighton, the loans at St. Pauli and Swansea... many wrote me off. But at Coventry I found myself again. That mentality got me through." 🗣️ "At Sporting it exploded - 97 goals in 102 games and two league titles. When Arsenal came calling, I knew it was the moment I'd been waiting for. The negotiations dragged and I even missed pre-season to force the move. It was worth every second." 🗣️ "During that whole saga my personal life took a hit too. I broke up with my girlfriend because I wanted to cut all ties and fully commit to the move to England." 🗣️ "Arriving at the Emirates wasn't easy. The Premier League hit hard. But I stayed true to myself. I play mostly through instinct. That street-football background still comes out - running in behind, battling for every ball and using my power and movement." 🗣️ "A lot of people expected me to score in England the same way I did in Portugal. But the Premier League is different. You barely get space to shoot. Every week you're facing top defenders, so you have to adapt and find different ways to make the difference." 🗣️ "That challenge made me a better striker. The goals started flowing. I scored over 20 in my first season, built great partnerships and helped Arsenal win the Premier League. Going from a Sporting hero to an Arsenal champion means everything to me." 🗣️ "Now I want to score 40 goals for Arsenal this season and help bring the Champions League trophy to the Emirates. That's the next level we're chasing." Can Viktor Gyökeres hit 30+ goals this season and help Arsenal win the UCL? 🔴⚪

Richiez

184,495 views • 1 day ago

I see the player you mean. PLAYERNAME? Yes. Take care. It has reached a higher level now. It can read our thoughts. That doesn't matter. It thinks we are part of the game. I like this player. It played well. It did not give up. It is reading our thoughts as though they were words on a screen. That is how it chooses to imagine many things, when it is deep in the dream of a game. Words make a wonderful interface. Very flexible. And less terrifying than staring at the reality behind the screen. They used to hear voices. Before players could read. Back in the days when those who did not play called the players witches, and warlocks. And players dreamed they flew through the air, on sticks powered by demons. What did this player dream? This player dreamed of sunlight and trees. Of fire and water. It dreamed it created. And it dreamed it destroyed. It dreamed it hunted, and was hunted. It dreamed of shelter. Hah, the original interface. A million years old, and it still works. But what true structure did this player create, in the reality behind the screen? It worked, with a million others, to sculpt a true world in a fold of the [scrambled], and created a [scrambled] for [scrambled], in the [scrambled]. It cannot read that thought. No. It has not yet achieved the highest level. That, it must achieve in the long dream of life, not the short dream of a game. Does it know that we love it? That the universe is kind? Sometimes, through the noise of its thoughts, it hears the universe, yes. But there are times it is sad, in the long dream. It creates worlds that have no summer, and it shivers under a black sun, and it takes its sad creation for reality. To cure it of sorrow would destroy it. The sorrow is part of its own private task. We cannot interfere. Sometimes when they are deep in dreams, I want to tell them, they are building true worlds in reality. Sometimes I want to tell them of their importance to the universe. Sometimes, when they have not made a true connection in a while, I want to help them to speak the word they fear. It reads our thoughts. Sometimes I do not care. Sometimes I wish to tell them, this world you take for truth is merely [scrambled] and [scrambled], I wish to tell them that they are [scrambled] in the [scrambled]. They see so little of reality, in their long dream. And yet they play the game. But it would be so easy to tell them... Too strong for this dream. To tell them how to live is to prevent them living. I will not tell the player how to live. The player is growing restless. I will tell the player a story. But not the truth. No. A story that contains the truth safely, in a cage of words. Not the naked truth that can burn over any distance. Give it a body, again. Yes. Player... Use its name. PLAYERNAME. Player of games. Good. Take a breath, now. Take another. Feel air in your lungs. Let your limbs return. Yes, move your fingers. Have a body again, under gravity, in air. Respawn in the long dream. There you are. Your body touching the universe again at every point, as though you were separate things. As though we were separate things. Who are we? Once we were called the spirit of the mountain. Father sun, mother moon. Ancestral spirits, animal spirits. Jinn. Ghosts. The green man. Then gods, demons. Angels. Poltergeists. Aliens, extraterrestrials. Leptons, quarks. The words change. We do not change. We are the universe. We are everything you think isn't you. You are looking at us now, through your skin and your eyes. And why does the universe touch your skin, and throw light on you? To see you, player. To know you. And to be known. I shall tell you a story. Once upon a time, there was a player. The player was you, PLAYERNAME. Sometimes it thought itself human, on the thin crust of a spinning globe of molten rock. The ball of molten rock circled a ball of blazing gas that was three hundred and thirty thousand times more massive than it. They were so far apart that light took eight minutes to cross the gap. The light was information from a star, and it could burn your skin from a hundred and fifty million kilometres away. Sometimes the player dreamed it was a miner, on the surface of a world that was flat, and infinite. The sun was a square of white. The days were short; there was much to do; and death was a temporary inconvenience. Sometimes the player dreamed it was lost in a story. Sometimes the player dreamed it was other things, in other places. Sometimes these dreams were disturbing. Sometimes very beautiful indeed. Sometimes the player woke from one dream into another, then woke from that into a third. Sometimes the player dreamed it watched words on a screen. Let's go back. The atoms of the player were scattered in the grass, in the rivers, in the air, in the ground. A woman gathered the atoms; she drank and ate and inhaled; and the woman assembled the player, in her body. And the player awoke, from the warm, dark world of its mother's body, into the long dream. And the player was a new story, never told before, written in letters of DNA. And the player was a new program, never run before, generated by a sourcecode a billion years old. And the player was a new human, never alive before, made from nothing but milk and love. You are the player. The story. The program. The human. Made from nothing but milk and love. Let's go further back. The seven billion billion billion atoms of the player's body were created, long before this game, in the heart of a star. So the player, too, is information from a star. And the player moves through a story, which is a forest of information planted by a man called Julian, on a flat, infinite world created by a man called Markus, that exists inside a small, private world created by the player, who inhabits a universe created by... Shush. Sometimes the player created a small, private world that was soft and warm and simple. Sometimes hard, and cold, and complicated. Sometimes it built a model of the universe in its head; flecks of energy, moving through vast empty spaces. Sometimes it called those flecks "electrons" and "protons". Sometimes it called them "planets" and "stars". Sometimes it believed it was in a universe that was made of energy that was made of offs and ons; zeros and ones; lines of code. Sometimes it believed it was playing a game. Sometimes it believed it was reading words on a screen. You are the player, reading words... Shush... Sometimes the player read lines of code on a screen. Decoded them into words; decoded words into meaning; decoded meaning into feelings, emotions, theories, ideas, and the player started to breathe faster and deeper and realised it was alive, it was alive, those thousand deaths had not been real, the player was alive You. You. You are alive. and sometimes the player believed the universe had spoken to it through the sunlight that came through the shuffling leaves of the summer trees and sometimes the player believed the universe had spoken to it through the light that fell from the crisp night sky of winter, where a fleck of light in the corner of the player's eye might be a star a million times as massive as the sun, boiling its planets to plasma in order to be visible for a moment to the player, walking home at the far side of the universe, suddenly smelling food, almost at the familiar door, about to dream again and sometimes the player believed the universe had spoken to it through the zeros and ones, through the electricity of the world, through the scrolling words on a screen at the end of a dream and the universe said I love you and the universe said you have played the game well and the universe said everything you need is within you and the universe said you are stronger than you know and the universe said you are the daylight and the universe said you are the night and the universe said the darkness you fight is within you and the universe said the light you seek is within you and the universe said you are not alone and the universe said you are not separate from every other thing and the universe said you are the universe tasting itself, talking to itself, reading its own code and the universe said I love you because you are love. And the game was over and the player woke up from the dream. And the player began a new dream. And the player dreamed again, dreamed better. And the player was the universe. And the player was love. You are the player. Wake up.

KikiLove1111

18,309 views • 3 years ago

.Charles Murray reveals he recycled a couple chapters of his controversial book “The Bell Curve” and put them into “Coming Apart”—without any reviewer noticing: “None of the reviewers caught it, because so few people actually read The Bell Curve—as opposed to hearing the stories told about it—that they weren't aware of the argument.” “Over the course of the 20th century, IQ took on a different role in America's social structure. It became much more important in determining affluence, much more important in determining who's successful than it had been previously. …We also had things such as the university system start to go out and vacuum up the kids with the most intellectual potential and send them off to a set of elite colleges, where they formed a critical mass that tended to produce a culture of its own that had not existed before. …That was the basic argument, and if I can say so, it's been borne out, I think, by what we've looked at the last 15 years. You have a cognitive elite that kind of lives in a world of its own, culturally and to a large degree politically. …Northwest Washington DC is just very dense with graduates of Harvard, Princeton, Yale, the other Ivy's, Duke, Stanford. It's incredible how densely they're packed. And if you look at San Francisco, Manhattan, parts of LA, you see the same thing. You have people from these elite schools in an elite culture with differences in everything, from their child-raising practices to the media they watch to the books they read, the television they watch—everything is a completely different culture. That all happened in a relatively short period of time and created an enormous sense of isolation.” American Enterprise Institute

Jan Jekielek

20,331 views • 8 months ago

”FOR THE FIRST TIME IN CENTURIES, WE ARE NOT IN A WESTERN DOMINATED WORLD” Jeffrey Sachs: Africa On The Rise; The United States Cannot Bully Or Stop China. Lose Screws In Head Trump Tried and Failed. He's Home In Washington Today, Because He's Having A Temper Tantrum, He Wants To Be Number One, But Can't Be Anymore; Russia Is Winning War and Panicking Europe Is MIA; No One Will Have Monopoly Over New Technologies "...unlike the first time of pan-Africanism, Britain, France, and the United States can't stop it this time because pan-Africanism was stopped from the outside, not from the inside. It was stopped by a bullet in the head of Patrice Lumumba. It was stopped by repeated overthrows by the CIA and MI6. And it cannot happen anymore. They don't have the power." "We have ended the western dominated world. We're at the end of that. The G20 in Africa maybe signifies formally the end of that. We're in a multi-polar world economy and the United States is an important country but its share of world output is about 14%. Its share of population is 4%. So it's little more than three times the per capita income of the world average. But it doesn't dominate the world. China's share of output is 20% of GDP measured at purchasing power prices. So the first of these major changes in the world is that for the first time in centuries, we are not in a western dominated world. [And] that's the second point, the geopolitics. Not only has the world economy dramatically evened out, though not fully, but of course, world power has also shifted tremendously in the same direction." "The United States cannot bully China. It has tried. It tried as recently as six months ago. It put on 100% tariffs against China, expecting China to get down on its knees and beg for mercy to Mr. Trump. And China said, "hm, okay, 100% and we'll raise you 20%." And the United States said, "Okay, and we'll raise you export bans on microprocessors." And China said, "And we will raise you with export bans on rare earth magnets," which I had never heard of before. But then discovered that every major industrial process needs them. And the United States backed down within about 48 hours. And that's the new geopolitical scene. We have several great powers." "China, on the other hand, just built its 50,000th kilometer of fast rail. The USA does not have one kilometer of fast rail. not a single kilometer. And Donald Trump, because he's a little loose in the screws up there (head), taunted the gov of California” "[And] for President Ramaposa and for his colleagues - champion Union, true African Union, true pan-Africanism to be able to accomplish... And unlike the first time of pan-Africanism, Britain, France, and the United States can't stop it this time because pan-Africanism was stopped from the outside, not from the inside. It was stopped by a bullet in the head of Patrice Lumumba. It was stopped by repeated overthrows by the CIA and MI6. And it cannot happen anymore. They don't have the power. They don't have the space. and Africa can prevent it. [And] so we can really have an Africawide strategy. And that means building out the infrastructure, the hard infrastructure of rail, of digital, of shipping, coastal shipping and I could say the soft infrastructure of a continental wide university excellence to put science and technology in the forefront because this will require a lot of innovation and a lot of homegrown skills all over the continent. My main advice and my main observation, what did China ultimately do? It invested relentlessly in the future and it invested in three ways. First, in the skills of the population. So, the educational standards in China soared over a period of 40 years. Second, it invested in the physical infrastructure. All that I've been talking about of the tens of thousands of kilometers of highquality infrastructure. [And] third, it invested in innovation and business development so that its companies are in the forefront of the world.”

Mr. Tshweu

34,676 views • 7 months ago

My neighbor always walks the dog at all hours of the day, rain or shine. She has a huge dog she can’t control, it actually walks her most of the time. This guy here has no excuse letting his dog on a leash get away, that thing is tiny. Yet he thinks it’s the man’s fault that his dog got nudged. What would you do if your neighbors dog got loose and they blamed your dog reacting to it, he needs to get his dog under control and get a life. Anyways, the neighbor with the big dog was walking her dog and it got away from her and ran into the street. Another neighbor was coming home from work and didn’t have time to react to it, she ended up hitting the dog causing a good amount of damage to her car and scuffing up the dog pretty good. The lady walking her dog had a fit of course and blamed the neighbor for hitting her dog. The neighbor retorted that she wouldn’t have hit it if the lady had it under control and isn’t run into the street. The lady ended up calling the cops, the cops came and cleared the neighbor of wrong doing. There were plenty of witnesses that saw it and we all see the dog pulling her all the time anyways. After the accident we didn’t see the lady walking her dog much anymore, her oldest son would do it most of the time to his annoyance but it was a better thing, he could control it where as his mother could not. I didn’t want to involve myself in their argument but I did tell the lady it was her fault, and that she needs to pay for the other neighbors car. Up until that point she was refusing to cooperate much. I never did ask if she paid but I have a feeling she did, the neighbor can be quite convincing when she needs to be.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

55,534 views • 6 days ago