正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

THE SNL SKETCH THAT NORM MACDONALD ADMITTED HE “STOLE” Before Will Ferrell was screaming at Sean Connery, before “Turd Ferguson” became part of SNL history, Celebrity Jeopardy! began with Norm Macdonald watching another comedy show. Macdonald was a huge fan of SCTV. One sketch in particular, “Half-Wits,” featured Eugene...

90,523 次观看 • 6 天前 •via X (Twitter)

5 条评论

𝓥𝓲𝓫𝓮𝓼𝓞𝓷𝓣𝓪𝓹 的头像
𝓥𝓲𝓫𝓮𝓼𝓞𝓷𝓣𝓪𝓹6 天前

Norm Macdonald didn't just want to play a stupid contestant. He wanted to play Burt Reynolds. But not the Burt Reynolds of the 1990s. Macdonald wanted the Reynolds he remembered from his childhood—the larger-than-life movie star of the early 1970s. When Macdonald went to wardrobe, they had prepared him with a white beard and contemporary-looking clothing. He immediately objected. That wasn't his Burt Reynolds. He wanted 1972 Burt Reynolds. The joke was subtle enough that the other characters barely acknowledged it. Everyone else looked like they belonged in 1996. Burt Reynolds looked like he'd somehow walked straight out of the 1970s and into a television studio. That became part of what made Macdonald's character so strange. He wasn't merely stupid. He was completely uninterested. Sean Connery, played by Darrell Hammond, was aggressively wrong. Jerry Lewis, played by Martin Short, was wildly unpredictable. And Burt Reynolds seemed to exist on another planet entirely. Then there was Will Ferrell's Alex Trebek. Ferrell played the host as the only person desperately trying to preserve some dignity while everything around him collapsed. That contrast became the real engine of the sketch. On December 7, 1996, SNL aired the first Celebrity Jeopardy! And almost immediately, the audience could see there was something different about it. The sketch wasn't simply parodying a game show. It had created its own little universe. And SNL would keep returning to it.

𝓥𝓲𝓫𝓮𝓼𝓞𝓷𝓣𝓪𝓹 的头像
𝓥𝓲𝓫𝓮𝓼𝓞𝓷𝓣𝓪𝓹6 天前

The remarkable thing about Celebrity Jeopardy! wasn't that it worked once. It kept working. The sketch returned repeatedly during Will Ferrell's SNL years, with Darrell Hammond continuing as Sean Connery and Norm Macdonald returning as Burt Reynolds. Different celebrities could be placed behind the podium. Different impressions could be introduced. But the basic formula remained: Give famous people a game show. Make the questions easier than they should be. Then let their personalities destroy the entire thing. And the host has to somehow keep the program moving. That formula gave SNL something extremely valuable. A world audiences already understood. You didn't need a complicated setup every time. The moment Will Ferrell walked out as Alex Trebek, viewers knew what kind of chaos was coming. And the characters became bigger than the original premise. Sean Connery developed his bizarre obsession with insulting Trebek. Burt Reynolds became the completely detached celebrity who seemed almost offended by the entire experience. And Trebek became the exhausted straight man trapped between them. What began with Norm Macdonald borrowing the basic structure of an SCTV sketch had evolved into something distinctly its own. That's an important part of comedy history. Ideas rarely appear from nowhere. Comedians watch other comedians. They borrow structures. They transform them. They add their own voice. And sometimes that transformation becomes so successful that the new version eventually becomes the one everybody remembers.

𝓥𝓲𝓫𝓮𝓼𝓞𝓷𝓣𝓪𝓹 的头像
𝓥𝓲𝓫𝓮𝓼𝓞𝓷𝓣𝓪𝓹6 天前

There is a reason Celebrity Jeopardy! remains one of the SNL sketches people immediately recognize. It wasn't built around one punchline. It was built around characters. That's why the premise could survive different contestants, different hosts and different episodes. The audience wasn't returning simply to hear another stupid answer. They were returning to watch Alex Trebek lose his patience. They were waiting for Sean Connery to insult him. They were waiting to see what Burt Reynolds would do. And they were waiting for the entire structure of the respectable game show to collapse. The first sketch aired in 1996. The recurring version continued for years, with Ferrell eventually returning to the character for later SNL appearances. Peacock identifies the December 7, 1996 episode as the first Celebrity Jeopardy! segment and notes that Ferrell and Hammond's characters became recurring fixtures. But perhaps the most interesting part of the story happened before the audience ever saw it. Norm Macdonald had an idea he knew was closely related to something another comedian had already created. So he asked. Eugene Levy gave him permission. Then Macdonald, Steve Higgins and the SNL cast turned that starting point into something new. That's the part people often miss about comedy. The finished sketch is what millions remember. But behind the finished sketch are influences, conversations, permissions, rewrites and performers making dozens of tiny decisions. Sometimes the history behind a two-minute comedy sketch is almost as interesting as the sketch itself.

Dope thrills 的头像
Dope thrills6 天前

Most people would have just taken the idea and hoped nobody noticed.

Paper Ebiowei 的头像
Paper Ebiowei6 天前

Ferrell’s Trebek starts composed and ends looking like a man whose soul has left the building; the slow collapse is the real joke.

相关视频

The man who invented modern fantasy didn't publish his first novel until he was forty-five. By that age, J.R.R. Tolkien had already built a respectable life. He was an Oxford professor, an expert in ancient languages, with a wife and four children and a settled academic career. He was exactly the kind of man who might reasonably have decided that the shape of his life was already fixed. The work he would be remembered for, he had not yet even begun... The story, which Tolkien told himself, is that one summer he was grading examination papers, when he turned a page and found that a student had left it blank. Without quite knowing why, he wrote a single sentence on it: "In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit." He did not know what a hobbit was. He had spent years inventing languages and mythologies as a private passion, and telling stories to his own children, never imagining any of it would reach the world. But that one line began to grow. It became a story, and then a book, and in 1937, at the age of forty-five, Tolkien published The Hobbit. It was a success, and his publisher asked for a sequel. Tolkien warned them it might take some time. It took 17 years... He wrote it in the margins of a demanding full-time job, revising endlessly, doubting it often. When The Lord of the Rings was finally published, in 1954 and 1955, he was in his early sixties. That book, begun as a middle-aged professor's private side project, went on to sell well over a hundred million copies, to invent modern fantasy as we know it, and to reshape the imagination of the entire world. Tolkien already had a full and respectable life behind him. And still, the thing he is remembered for, the thing that outlived him and reached hundreds of millions of people, was something he began at forty-five, at an age when it would have been the easiest thing in the world to tell himself he had already missed his chance. He didn't. It's never as late as it feels.

James Lucas

94,603 次观看 • 2 个月前

Jackie Gleason, the legendary American comedian and star of "The Honeymooners", on the time he got CBS to send him a private train to Miami: In the 1960s, Gleason decided he didn't want to shoot his show in New York anymore. He wanted to do it in Miami, and he wanted to get there in style. "When we're doing the Honeymooners, I had a big contract for that for two years. And after the first year, I said I didn't want to do it. And they didn't believe me. They thought I had a job somewhere else. And finally, they realized that I just didn't want to do it." When the network came back asking him to do another show, Gleason was in California making a picture. He said yes, but with one condition: "I said, 'All right.' I said, 'But I want a train that goes to Florida.' Because I had come down here and played golf and liked it and I figured might as well go to Florida and do the show. Play golf all the time and they went for it." They went for it. What followed was a rolling party across the country. Gleason describes what was on the train: "Everything. We had two Dixieland bands come from California and they would spell each other. I'd say to them, 'Take five miles,' and the parties went on 24 hours." Asked if there were girls on the train, he laughs: "Boy, there were girls. There certainly were. And they were very, very nice girls. Nothing on it happened. I know that sounds ridiculous, but it didn't. Might have been because the berths were too small, but regardless of that, nothing happened on that trip." Asked if there was a bar on the train, his answer is perfect: "A bar. The train was a bar. I guess that's a classic example of what clout is." Then he delivers the line that sums up the whole story: "'Send a train, please.' That's right. When you've got good ratings and you're one, two, or three in the ratings, there is nothing your little heart desires that they don't provide."

Emmett Voss

289,880 次观看 • 5 个月前

ABC's Jonathan Karl at 445pm Eastern on a phone call he had with President Trump after leaRNing of Charlie Kirk's assassination: “I had a brief conversation with the President over the phone. He sounded quite upset, quite down about this. ‘He told me it's horrific. It's one of the most horrific things I've ever seen. He was a great guy. He was a good man. He was an incredible guy. There's nobody like him.’ Charlie Kirk, as Mary pointed out, was truly a personal confidant of the president, incredibly close to the President's son, Donald Trump Jr. and really, in many ways, the beating heart of the MAGA movement, his Turning point USA organization, not just a campus organization. David, this was an organization that put on some of the largest and most ambitious conventions, rallies, events for Donald Trump around the country with pyrotechnics and huge crowds. Also, one other thing I think that is very important about Charlie Kirk is that is that he was somebody, particularly in recent months, who was making a point to try to engage with those that he disagreed with. Look, he had far right views, some very controversial views, but he sat down not long ago and did a podcast with Gavin Newsom, the governor of California. On — on his college campus tours, he would often give speeches. He would be protested. But then when it was over, when the discussion was over, his part of speaking, he would welcome questions from the crowds, including hostile questions in many cases from college students, and engage in those who found his views deeply problematic and offensive. He wanted to engage in those people, and he did so directly. And in fact, that appears to be what he was doing today in Utah when this horrific event happened.”

Curtis Houck

648,285 次观看 • 1 年前

Sean Connery on the one thing that separates a great James Bond from a forgettable one: Reality. In a rare interview, Connery was asked to compare his portrayal of Bond with Roger Moore's. He didn't dodge the question. "I think it's just a different appetite, that's all," he said. Connery explained that his approach to Bond was always rooted in grounding the character, no matter how outlandish the situation: "I played Bond with the reality, credibility, and hopefully still accomplishing stunts and effects and what have you, but out of it some indigenous humor. Anything that happens is possible." In other words: The audience should never be winking at the screen. They should be believing it. He felt Moore inherited a different direction, one that had already begun drifting toward spectacle over substance by the time Diamonds Are Forever was released: "His is a sort of parody of the character, as it were, in that situation, so that you will go for the laugh or the humor at whatever the cost of the credibility or the reality." Neither approach was wrong. Both found their audiences. But Connery was clear about where the line sat for him. What's remarkable is how that philosophy carried across decades and actors. When Daniel Craig stepped into the role decades later, he returned the character to exactly the edge Connery had always described. Darker. More believable. The danger more real. Connery noticed: "The spectrum of actors, I mean from myself to Daniel Craig, who I thought was fantastic, marvelous." And when told Craig had studied Connery's films extensively before taking the role, his response was characteristically understated: "Well, I'm flattered. Well, I mean, it's there to see, and the danger element, I think he really gets it." Source: The South Bank Show

History Nerd

252,987 次观看 • 2 个月前