Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

THE SOLAR SYSTEM CAUSES CLIMATE CHANGES, CO2 FOLLOWS Ice core studies have proven that warming precedes rises in CO2, so we can deduce that warming causes CO2, and not the other way round as Al Gore claimed. This was a political agenda that skewed science. This happens because the... show more

Robin Monotti

244,164 subscribers

39,915 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Health & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

THE TRUTH ABOUT CO2: CO2 lags earth temperature changes by ~800 years, not the other way round. The CO2 causing Climate Change narrative is a hoax, climate change causes CO2 change instead, because it is emitted by the ocean, which acts as a temperature dependent carbon sink.

THE TRUTH ABOUT CO2: CO2 lags earth temperature changes by ~800 years, not the other way round. The CO2 causing Climate Change narrative is a hoax, climate change causes CO2 change instead, because it is emitted by the ocean, which acts as a temperature dependent carbon sink.

illuminatibot

62,886 views • 4 months ago

THE CORRELATION OF TEMPERATURE TO CO2 IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT WE ARE TOLD: TEMPERATURE CHANGE LEADS TO CO2 CHANGE, NOT VICEVERSA: CO2 lags earth temperature changes by 800 years, not the other way round. The CO2 causing Climate Change narrative is a hoax, climate change causes CO2 change instead, because it is emitted by the ocean, which acts as a temperature dependent carbon sink. SCIENTIFIC PROOF CO2 IS NOT THE CAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature Changes Across Termination III | Science "We have measured the isotopic composition of argon in air bubbles in the Vostok core during Termination III (∼240,000 years before the present). This record most likely reflects the temperature and accumulation change, although the mechanism remains unclear. The sequence of events during Termination III suggests that the CO2 increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 ± 200 years and preceded the Northern Hemisphere deglaciation."

THE CORRELATION OF TEMPERATURE TO CO2 IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT WE ARE TOLD: TEMPERATURE CHANGE LEADS TO CO2 CHANGE, NOT VICEVERSA: CO2 lags earth temperature changes by 800 years, not the other way round. The CO2 causing Climate Change narrative is a hoax, climate change causes CO2 change instead, because it is emitted by the ocean, which acts as a temperature dependent carbon sink. SCIENTIFIC PROOF CO2 IS NOT THE CAUSE OF CLIMATE CHANGE Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature Changes Across Termination III | Science "We have measured the isotopic composition of argon in air bubbles in the Vostok core during Termination III (∼240,000 years before the present). This record most likely reflects the temperature and accumulation change, although the mechanism remains unclear. The sequence of events during Termination III suggests that the CO2 increase lagged Antarctic deglacial warming by 800 ± 200 years and preceded the Northern Hemisphere deglaciation."

Robin Monotti

112,709 views • 1 year ago

“Humans are not causing climate change” “You can have very high carbon dioxide levels historically, yet the temperature was low” “The Oceans are warming from underneath, and as they do, they release CO2 into the atmosphere” Scientist Author Gregg Barden exposes the climate change scam, citing over 420,000 years of ice core data showing temperature rises that always proceed CO2 rises.

“Humans are not causing climate change” “You can have very high carbon dioxide levels historically, yet the temperature was low” “The Oceans are warming from underneath, and as they do, they release CO2 into the atmosphere” Scientist Author Gregg Barden exposes the climate change scam, citing over 420,000 years of ice core data showing temperature rises that always proceed CO2 rises.

Concerned Citizen

89,379 views • 8 months ago

Scientific Bombshell Shatters the Climate Change Narrative A groundbreaking new study has found that CO2 "may have little to no further warming effect" on the Earth's atmosphere. The striking finding that made the authors come to this conclusion is the fact that the Earth's atmosphere already contains over 6 kg/m² of CO2, which is ten times the "saturation mass" needed for the gas to absorb radiation. This means that additional CO2 emissions might not significantly increase global temperatures, as the atmosphere has already absorbed nearly all the heat it can within the CO2 spectrum. The study, titled “Climatic consequences of the process of saturation of radiation absorption in gases,” was published in Applications in Engineering Science. These findings support the argument made by independent researchers like Randall Carlson, who actually claims that CO2 comes with many benefits, such as boosting plant growth and crop yields. He says, “Hundreds of studies have consistently demonstrated significant improvements in plant growth, crop yields, and drought resistance under elevated CO2 conditions.” This latest study aligns with what Carlson has been saying all along and is absolutely devastating for the climate change narrative.

Scientific Bombshell Shatters the Climate Change Narrative A groundbreaking new study has found that CO2 "may have little to no further warming effect" on the Earth's atmosphere. The striking finding that made the authors come to this conclusion is the fact that the Earth's atmosphere already contains over 6 kg/m² of CO2, which is ten times the "saturation mass" needed for the gas to absorb radiation. This means that additional CO2 emissions might not significantly increase global temperatures, as the atmosphere has already absorbed nearly all the heat it can within the CO2 spectrum. The study, titled “Climatic consequences of the process of saturation of radiation absorption in gases,” was published in Applications in Engineering Science. These findings support the argument made by independent researchers like Randall Carlson, who actually claims that CO2 comes with many benefits, such as boosting plant growth and crop yields. He says, “Hundreds of studies have consistently demonstrated significant improvements in plant growth, crop yields, and drought resistance under elevated CO2 conditions.” This latest study aligns with what Carlson has been saying all along and is absolutely devastating for the climate change narrative.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

437,820 views • 1 year ago

Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer: "In the complete history of planet Earth, we have had millions of climate changes, and not one of these we can identify was driven by a change in CO2 in the atmosphere." "We see no record of CO2 driving climate in the past, and there is therefore no logical reason to think that climate change in the present is driven by changes of CO2." Credit: ADH TV

Geologist Prof. Ian Plimer: "In the complete history of planet Earth, we have had millions of climate changes, and not one of these we can identify was driven by a change in CO2 in the atmosphere." "We see no record of CO2 driving climate in the past, and there is therefore no logical reason to think that climate change in the present is driven by changes of CO2." Credit: ADH TV

Wide Awake Media

119,842 views • 2 years ago

Professor Emeritus Dr Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming, but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years, chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer, 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Professor Emeritus Dr Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming, but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years, chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer, 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Electroverse

34,820 views • 7 days ago

🚨🚨🚨 CO2 is the GAS of LIFE. CO2 is NOT a pollutant👇 “Climate change is corporate fraud : There is a fraudulent campaign by an international lobby to present CO2, which is the gas of LIFE as a poison - in REALITY, all life on earth is entirely dependant on CO2, and for them to have turned CO2 into an enemy illustrates how mad the world has become.”

🚨🚨🚨 CO2 is the GAS of LIFE. CO2 is NOT a pollutant👇 “Climate change is corporate fraud : There is a fraudulent campaign by an international lobby to present CO2, which is the gas of LIFE as a poison - in REALITY, all life on earth is entirely dependant on CO2, and for them to have turned CO2 into an enemy illustrates how mad the world has become.”

Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE🦁

387,508 views • 1 year ago

A study published in Nature's Climate and Atmospheric Science found that despite 70 years of rising CO2, Antarctica hasn't warmed. Not even slightly. The Polar Amplification Theory claims rising CO2 should warm the poles fastest, due to feedback from melting ice and increased water vapor, which supposedly amplify the greenhouse effect. But this isn't playing out. Despite wild fluctuations in sea ice in recent years, from record highs to record lows in the space of a decade, Antarctica isn't warming.

A study published in Nature's Climate and Atmospheric Science found that despite 70 years of rising CO2, Antarctica hasn't warmed. Not even slightly. The Polar Amplification Theory claims rising CO2 should warm the poles fastest, due to feedback from melting ice and increased water vapor, which supposedly amplify the greenhouse effect. But this isn't playing out. Despite wild fluctuations in sea ice in recent years, from record highs to record lows in the space of a decade, Antarctica isn't warming.

Electroverse

13,966 views • 10 days ago

A study published in Nature's Climate and Atmospheric Science found that despite 70 years of rising CO2, Antarctica hasn't warmed. Not even slightly. The 'Polar Amplification Theory' claims rising CO2 should warm the poles fastest, due to feedback from melting ice and increased water vapor, which supposedly amplify the greenhouse effect. But this isn't playing out. Despite wild fluctuations in sea ice in recent years, from record highs to record lows in the space of a decade, Antarctica isn't warming. The models may have melted the ice. But reality didn't.

A study published in Nature's Climate and Atmospheric Science found that despite 70 years of rising CO2, Antarctica hasn't warmed. Not even slightly. The 'Polar Amplification Theory' claims rising CO2 should warm the poles fastest, due to feedback from melting ice and increased water vapor, which supposedly amplify the greenhouse effect. But this isn't playing out. Despite wild fluctuations in sea ice in recent years, from record highs to record lows in the space of a decade, Antarctica isn't warming. The models may have melted the ice. But reality didn't.

Electroverse

16,005 views • 4 months ago

"It has NEVER been proven that human emissions of Co2 drive global warming." -Ian Plimer, Geologist "This is about money...the biggest con that we have ever had...the 'gas of life' is not changing the climate." "We have a fallacy from day one in this whole climate hysteria."

"It has NEVER been proven that human emissions of Co2 drive global warming." -Ian Plimer, Geologist "This is about money...the biggest con that we have ever had...the 'gas of life' is not changing the climate." "We have a fallacy from day one in this whole climate hysteria."

Valerie Anne Smith

40,542 views • 7 months ago

“There is NO Climate Emergency” “This is about money - it has nothing to do with the Climate” “It’s never been proven that Human Co2 emissions drive Global Warming” “This is the biggest Con we have ever had - it’s not underpinned by science”

“There is NO Climate Emergency” “This is about money - it has nothing to do with the Climate” “It’s never been proven that Human Co2 emissions drive Global Warming” “This is the biggest Con we have ever had - it’s not underpinned by science”

Concerned Citizen

256,319 views • 1 year ago

New research says it isn't CO2 driving the climate, rather it's gradients and water vapor. A 2025 study in Frontiers argues the real thermostat is the vertical temperature gradient and the water cycle. Water vapor and clouds account for about 95% of the atmosphere's radiative effect. CO2 contributes roughly 4-5%, with only 4% of that human-made. Without the lapse rate, i.e. the steady cooling with altitude, extra CO2 would have no warming effect at all. On Earth, air cools about 6.5C per kilometer, and that gradient, not carbon, sets surface warmth. In their model, doubling CO2 adds at most 1.5C, or nothing. Moisture, clouds and natural dynamics run the climate. CO2 is just along for the ride.

New research says it isn't CO2 driving the climate, rather it's gradients and water vapor. A 2025 study in Frontiers argues the real thermostat is the vertical temperature gradient and the water cycle. Water vapor and clouds account for about 95% of the atmosphere's radiative effect. CO2 contributes roughly 4-5%, with only 4% of that human-made. Without the lapse rate, i.e. the steady cooling with altitude, extra CO2 would have no warming effect at all. On Earth, air cools about 6.5C per kilometer, and that gradient, not carbon, sets surface warmth. In their model, doubling CO2 adds at most 1.5C, or nothing. Moisture, clouds and natural dynamics run the climate. CO2 is just along for the ride.

Electroverse

20,061 views • 1 day ago

New research claims human emissions are not driving atmospheric CO2. A paper by Dai Ato ran multiple linear regressions for 1959 to 2022, testing two predictors of the annual CO2 increase: sea surface temperature and human emissions. The result was clear: when the oceans warmed, CO2 levels rose almost exactly in step - about two to three parts per million for every one degree Celsius of warming. Adding human emissions to the model didn't change the outcome. Using only ocean temperature, the model reproduced global CO2 levels with near-perfect accuracy - a correlation of 0.995 and an error of just one to two ppm by 2022. The main factor governing the annual increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is sea surface temperature rather than human emissions. Earlier studies have shown the same pattern. Temperature changes first, CO2 follows. If Ato is correct, cutting human emissions won't lower atmospheric CO2 because it's the oceans that set the pace.

New research claims human emissions are not driving atmospheric CO2. A paper by Dai Ato ran multiple linear regressions for 1959 to 2022, testing two predictors of the annual CO2 increase: sea surface temperature and human emissions. The result was clear: when the oceans warmed, CO2 levels rose almost exactly in step - about two to three parts per million for every one degree Celsius of warming. Adding human emissions to the model didn't change the outcome. Using only ocean temperature, the model reproduced global CO2 levels with near-perfect accuracy - a correlation of 0.995 and an error of just one to two ppm by 2022. The main factor governing the annual increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is sea surface temperature rather than human emissions. Earlier studies have shown the same pattern. Temperature changes first, CO2 follows. If Ato is correct, cutting human emissions won't lower atmospheric CO2 because it's the oceans that set the pace.

Electroverse

215,137 views • 1 month ago

Scottish broadcaster, Neil Oliver, eloquently rebuts the mainstream media's relentless "human-induced climate change" fear mongering. "A rising volume of CO2 in the atmosphere is a consequence of a warming planet, not the cause of one. You might as well watch a horse-drawn cart and conclude it's the cart pushing the horse." "And notice too that CO2, by boosting plant growth, turns the planet fertile green, not angry red." Full monologue: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero

Scottish broadcaster, Neil Oliver, eloquently rebuts the mainstream media's relentless "human-induced climate change" fear mongering. "A rising volume of CO2 in the atmosphere is a consequence of a warming planet, not the cause of one. You might as well watch a horse-drawn cart and conclude it's the cart pushing the horse." "And notice too that CO2, by boosting plant growth, turns the planet fertile green, not angry red." Full monologue: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero

Wide Awake Media

611,233 views • 3 years ago

"We're in a bit of a CO2 famine now." Dr. William Happer, Professor Emeritus of Physics at Princeton University: "If you look over geological history, it's been much higher than now most of the time." "Most plants do better with more CO2 than they have now. So it's just a complete distortion of the truth to call it a pollutant. It's not a pollutant at all." "People [like Al Gore] saw a way to make a buck in demonising CO2, and that's what's happened." "Greenhouse operators... intentionally increase the CO2 concentration in the greenhouse by factors of two, three, four... because the plants grow so much better with more CO2."

"We're in a bit of a CO2 famine now." Dr. William Happer, Professor Emeritus of Physics at Princeton University: "If you look over geological history, it's been much higher than now most of the time." "Most plants do better with more CO2 than they have now. So it's just a complete distortion of the truth to call it a pollutant. It's not a pollutant at all." "People [like Al Gore] saw a way to make a buck in demonising CO2, and that's what's happened." "Greenhouse operators... intentionally increase the CO2 concentration in the greenhouse by factors of two, three, four... because the plants grow so much better with more CO2."

Wide Awake Media

194,419 views • 1 year ago

Here's Elon Musk explaining how we could warm up Mars. “Nuking Mars, I was a little flippant about that. But I think it's a really decent idea. It's hard to convey in 30 seconds on The Late Show. The sun is a nuclear explosion, a fusion explosion. So if you wanted to add energy to Mars, to warm it up, the source of almost all energy in the universe is fusion. What I was really talking about is creating two little suns, two pulsing suns above the North and South Pole of Mars. That would warm the poles up enough so that the frozen CO2 would gasify and densify the atmosphere. Some of the water would also heat up, and you'd have more water vapor and CO2 in the Martian atmosphere, which in that case is good because the CO2 ends up warming Mars up. And so you get a positive cycle of warming on Mars.” Vanity Fair New Establishment Summit, October 8, 2015.

Here's Elon Musk explaining how we could warm up Mars. “Nuking Mars, I was a little flippant about that. But I think it's a really decent idea. It's hard to convey in 30 seconds on The Late Show. The sun is a nuclear explosion, a fusion explosion. So if you wanted to add energy to Mars, to warm it up, the source of almost all energy in the universe is fusion. What I was really talking about is creating two little suns, two pulsing suns above the North and South Pole of Mars. That would warm the poles up enough so that the frozen CO2 would gasify and densify the atmosphere. Some of the water would also heat up, and you'd have more water vapor and CO2 in the Martian atmosphere, which in that case is good because the CO2 ends up warming Mars up. And so you get a positive cycle of warming on Mars.” Vanity Fair New Establishment Summit, October 8, 2015.

ELON CLIPS

42,068 views • 1 month ago

The IPCC says 'man-made' CO2 lingers in the atmosphere for decades or even centuries longer than 'natural' CO2. A new paper shows there is no physical basis for that claim. The atmosphere, oceans and land biosphere form one coupled system. CO2 is constantly exchanged between them. If human CO2 really lingered for decades longer, these observed exchange relationships would break. They do not. The sinks do not 'know' whether a CO2 molecule came from a chimney stack or a forest. Man-made and natural CO2 are absorbed at the same rate, with measurements showing an average atmospheric residence time of about four years. That behavior follows basic physics. However, when the physics don't cooperate, the IPCC rewrites reality.

The IPCC says 'man-made' CO2 lingers in the atmosphere for decades or even centuries longer than 'natural' CO2. A new paper shows there is no physical basis for that claim. The atmosphere, oceans and land biosphere form one coupled system. CO2 is constantly exchanged between them. If human CO2 really lingered for decades longer, these observed exchange relationships would break. They do not. The sinks do not 'know' whether a CO2 molecule came from a chimney stack or a forest. Man-made and natural CO2 are absorbed at the same rate, with measurements showing an average atmospheric residence time of about four years. That behavior follows basic physics. However, when the physics don't cooperate, the IPCC rewrites reality.

Electroverse

15,080 views • 6 months ago

Astrophysicist Dr Willie Soon says the climate is driven overwhelmingly by the sun, not by human carbon dioxide. He notes the sun supplies 99.99% of Earth's energy and its output fluctuates matching temperature shifts far better than CO2 trends. Soon argues the CO2 signal is below detection as a primary driver and that past climate swings like the Maunder Minimum and the Little Ice Age line up with solar variability, not emissions. Dr Soon calls the obsession with carbon dioxide political. You can tax CO2 but you can't tax the sun. He describes an "iron triangle" of government funding, compliant science and media amplification that turns uncertainty into dogma. Soon's message is simple: The climate system is solar driven, the CO2 narrative is wildly overstated and the real priority should be adaptation and affordable energy, not pretending we can regulate the sun.

Astrophysicist Dr Willie Soon says the climate is driven overwhelmingly by the sun, not by human carbon dioxide. He notes the sun supplies 99.99% of Earth's energy and its output fluctuates matching temperature shifts far better than CO2 trends. Soon argues the CO2 signal is below detection as a primary driver and that past climate swings like the Maunder Minimum and the Little Ice Age line up with solar variability, not emissions. Dr Soon calls the obsession with carbon dioxide political. You can tax CO2 but you can't tax the sun. He describes an "iron triangle" of government funding, compliant science and media amplification that turns uncertainty into dogma. Soon's message is simple: The climate system is solar driven, the CO2 narrative is wildly overstated and the real priority should be adaptation and affordable energy, not pretending we can regulate the sun.

Electroverse

35,322 views • 3 months ago