Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

The Stingray, or cell site simulator, is very much like a Flock camera. It scoops up data from every phone within range, just as Flock cameras do with every car they can see (or detect by other means). And like Flock, the phone interceptors monitor everyone in "hopes" of... show more

Orwell Day

42,525 subscribers

36,355 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

32 Kommentare

Profilbild von Orwell Day

Orwell Dayvor 1 Tag

If you have a DeFlock group in your town, contact them and suggest they add banning this to their efforts.

Profilbild von Mike Smith

Mike Smithvor 1 Tag

Friday: Federal District Court for Northern Oklahoma found the use of Flock cameras to track a suspect to be unconstitutional. Said police need a warrant.

Profilbild von Bruzzese

Bruzzesevor 1 Tag

The law should prohibit private data collection, by your smart phone, tv, Alexa, Google, thermostat, kitchen appliances, your car and credit cards. They all collect, store, and sell your private information.

Profilbild von The Cowboy Skater

The Cowboy Skatervor 1 Tag

These should be illegal for government to use. It’s a total abrogation of our foundational liberty. 🇺🇸😎

Profilbild von Gone fishing

Gone fishingvor 1 Tag

🇺🇸🤭

Profilbild von Orwell Day

Orwell Dayvor 1 Tag

Halo!

Profilbild von Hey Tam

Hey Tamvor 1 Tag

They are about every half mile apart on I-70 between St Louis and I-57

Profilbild von FadedPolo

FadedPolovor 1 Tag

Another technology that is unconstitutional. People just havnt talked about it enough yet. It’s time to make it topic of discussion!

Profilbild von James Bonz Pro-Choice

James Bonz Pro-Choicevor 1 Tag

Stingrays have been used since the 2000s (Mid-to-Late): The technology trickled down to local and state law enforcement agencies through federal grant programs and the FBI.

Profilbild von Hans Dann Parody Page

Hans Dann Parody Pagevor 1 Tag

Oh and changing your sim (If you watched too many Weeds episodes) does not change the phones ID. Most of the serial numbers are burned into the silicon.

Profilbild von Tonya Lampley

Tonya Lampleyvor 1 Tag

Turn off bluetooth when not in use.

Profilbild von ChossGuy 0IIIIIII0

ChossGuy 0IIIIIII0vor 1 Tag

This is why!

Profilbild von CJ

CJvor 1 Tag

Isnt that what they use for all the people gettjng off the planes before it hits local towers, or a version similar ,as people are coming out of airplane mode

Profilbild von matyas fulop

matyas fulopvor 1 Tag

You wouldn’t ever see a stingray. Don’t turn people against actual disaster recovery operations that are necessary when disaster strikes.

Profilbild von Dave

Davevor 1 Tag

I hope it all collapses

Profilbild von David 🇺🇸

David 🇺🇸vor 1 Tag

If you notice on your main screen that your 5G signal is down to 2G. It's more than likely your phone is being assimilated by a Stingray.

Profilbild von boliy

boliyvor 1 Tag

This one too, will end up with a favorable Court Outcome! PROTECT Our 4th Amendment Rights against WARRANTLESS SEARCHES!!!🇺🇸🇺🇸

Profilbild von Dullrich Files

Dullrich Filesvor 1 Tag

And the Suns not happy about them

Profilbild von Bases1921

Bases1921vor 1 Tag

Snowden warned of these gross violation of rights 15 years ago & Americans did nothing but sigh. Communism is right here, right now being ushered in & protected by the corrupt uniparty WH & every WH since JFK The Data Centers are not for AI. They are for searchable surveillance

Profilbild von Ken0369

Ken0369vor 1 Tag

Good information

Profilbild von Drew Lemacks

Drew Lemacksvor 1 Tag

I don't understand how it's not viewed as warrantless wiretapping.

Profilbild von Elijah Christian

Elijah Christianvor 1 Tag

"The Stingray devices have been out for quite a while. They once required a cop to have to obtain a warrant to operate it. No longer is a warrant required." Remember: 2G to 4G your phone had to find it. 5G finds you!!!

Profilbild von LizzieZ

LizzieZvor 1 Tag

They have found it to be akin to general warrants! Where are the law suits????

Profilbild von Brandon Rice

Brandon Ricevor 1 Tag

This doesn’t need to be stolen.

Profilbild von old school

old schoolvor 1 Tag

But if you're a dude on the sidewalk with a camera LE freaks and vigorously violates your 1st & 4th amendment right within the first minute of contact. KNOW your rights.

Profilbild von My Music by Me Music

My Music by Me Musicvor 1 Tag

Stingray's been around for years.

Profilbild von Hans Dann Parody Page

Hans Dann Parody Pagevor 1 Tag

Also cell companies sell their cell customers ,in real time, customers location, call records ect... In real time, to the feds.

Profilbild von MucklesFigtree

MucklesFigtreevor 1 Tag

Dystopian America. It's horrifying that we can see it coming and only a handful of lawyers and judges are stopping it.

Profilbild von John Webb

John Webbvor 1 Tag

Thats what being used to collect every LE officers in the USA data so they can be tracked nationwide and in real time. I bet they won't like that app when is goes live.

Profilbild von Michael Bond

Michael Bondvor 1 Tag

Make Home phones great again! Imagine if everyone dropped their cellphones!

Profilbild von Warren Upfett

Warren Upfettvor 1 Tag

Imagine if president AOC did this 🤯🤯

Profilbild von John L . just an "old crow"

John L . just an "old crow"vor 1 Tag

Don't sometimes you wish the Sun would produce one big EMP? It would fry everything electronic.

Ähnliche Videos

Flock cameras are being used to assist in giving speeding tickets “To add another reason to hate Flock cameras, they can now give you a ticket for speeding. I know this because I work at a dealership, and one of our customers is in a loaner. We got a, we got a piece of mail and come to find out it's literally a ticket with a picture of the car from the flock camera” “So yeah, doesn't even have to be the cops — we're just being watched 24/7 and it just is gonna keep on happening — beware” This is only going to keep getting worse So Flock isn’t themselves sending a ticket but law enforcement can use those cameras to identify people and send the ticket This happened before: Georgia State Patrol in 2025 used a Flock camera image to issue a ticket for holding a cell phone while riding a motorcycle It looks like it’s now happening with speeding tickets

Flock cameras are being used to assist in giving speeding tickets “To add another reason to hate Flock cameras, they can now give you a ticket for speeding. I know this because I work at a dealership, and one of our customers is in a loaner. We got a, we got a piece of mail and come to find out it's literally a ticket with a picture of the car from the flock camera” “So yeah, doesn't even have to be the cops — we're just being watched 24/7 and it just is gonna keep on happening — beware” This is only going to keep getting worse So Flock isn’t themselves sending a ticket but law enforcement can use those cameras to identify people and send the ticket This happened before: Georgia State Patrol in 2025 used a Flock camera image to issue a ticket for holding a cell phone while riding a motorcycle It looks like it’s now happening with speeding tickets

Wall Street Apes

72,164 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Police officer uses Flock system to give an abuser location data on his victim ----- A San Jose Police officer accessed information on Flock and provided it to a suspect (the officer's family member) in a domestic violence situation, enabling the suspect to locate the victim. These are just a few of the illegal uses of Flock cameras that we find out about. How many "successful and undetected" illegal uses of the Flock system have there been? How many have resulted in sexual violence or even death that we simply don't know about? Sooner or later, we are going to see a death directly tied to the misuse of the Flock camera system. It's only a matter of time.

Police officer uses Flock system to give an abuser location data on his victim ----- A San Jose Police officer accessed information on Flock and provided it to a suspect (the officer's family member) in a domestic violence situation, enabling the suspect to locate the victim. These are just a few of the illegal uses of Flock cameras that we find out about. How many "successful and undetected" illegal uses of the Flock system have there been? How many have resulted in sexual violence or even death that we simply don't know about? Sooner or later, we are going to see a death directly tied to the misuse of the Flock camera system. It's only a matter of time.

Orwell Day

11,598 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Eagle Sports gun range removes Flock cameras over privacy concerns ----- So the cameras were in place since February. Someone didn't make a viral video about it until now (5 - 6 months later). If you can make the time, go to a Flock camera near you. When you get to the camera, if it's near something "sensitive", like a gun range, or a marijuana dispensary, a bar, anything that the public should know about, make a video and post it. Tag me if you like, and/or some of the other flock pages you follow so we can help bring attention to the video. Maybe we can put pressure on the camera owner like we have with this business and get the camera taken down.

Eagle Sports gun range removes Flock cameras over privacy concerns ----- So the cameras were in place since February. Someone didn't make a viral video about it until now (5 - 6 months later). If you can make the time, go to a Flock camera near you. When you get to the camera, if it's near something "sensitive", like a gun range, or a marijuana dispensary, a bar, anything that the public should know about, make a video and post it. Tag me if you like, and/or some of the other flock pages you follow so we can help bring attention to the video. Maybe we can put pressure on the camera owner like we have with this business and get the camera taken down.

Orwell Day

41,844 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

American shows up in a disco suit and his own homemade Flock safety camera that he made in his garage to the Lee’s Summit, Missouri City Council meeting He’s exposing how the city spent $909,000 on only 54 Flock cameras the cameras remain property of Flock. Even if the contract runs its course and they cancel, Flock will keep the cameras despite paying nearly a million dollars for them It’s true I looked into the flock contracts and they maintain all rights and ownership over the cameras, once installed the city can’t even move the location of the cameras or remove them - Flock hardware “is owned and shall remain the exclusive property of Flock.” - “Title to any Flock Hardware shall not pass to [the city].” A The city may not remove, move or take possession of the units - At the end of the term, Flock removes the cameras The city is leasing the cameras and using the software…. This sounds like one of the biggest ripoffs to taxpayers in history That’s $16,833 per camera over the 5 year contract

American shows up in a disco suit and his own homemade Flock safety camera that he made in his garage to the Lee’s Summit, Missouri City Council meeting He’s exposing how the city spent $909,000 on only 54 Flock cameras the cameras remain property of Flock. Even if the contract runs its course and they cancel, Flock will keep the cameras despite paying nearly a million dollars for them It’s true I looked into the flock contracts and they maintain all rights and ownership over the cameras, once installed the city can’t even move the location of the cameras or remove them - Flock hardware “is owned and shall remain the exclusive property of Flock.” - “Title to any Flock Hardware shall not pass to [the city].” A The city may not remove, move or take possession of the units - At the end of the term, Flock removes the cameras The city is leasing the cameras and using the software…. This sounds like one of the biggest ripoffs to taxpayers in history That’s $16,833 per camera over the 5 year contract

Wall Street Apes

1,344,499 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

FOX: American cities reject Flock cameras due to privacy concerns ----- Glenn does a great job explaining the ins and outs of Flock cameras. He cites that they are unconstitutional, talks about the number of Flock cameras errors and says it is a mass surveillance system. He also asks what would Fauci have done during the lockdowns with Flock cameras? Flock cameras are an upgrade to the governments "lockdown system" and the they will try to use them again for lockdown 2.0. I think Glenn makes a misstep when he says the cameras must be used constitutionally. There is no way to use them constitutionally - they record without a warrant by default. The only way these tools can conform to the constitution is to remove them and not use them. Lastly, FOX repeats the lie that Flock cameras data is deleted in 30 days. Flock contractually obligates clients keep cameras live and recording and has even turned them back on in municipalities that have tried to shut them down. Flock wants the data above all else and that implies they are keeping the data permanently and selling the data illegally.

FOX: American cities reject Flock cameras due to privacy concerns ----- Glenn does a great job explaining the ins and outs of Flock cameras. He cites that they are unconstitutional, talks about the number of Flock cameras errors and says it is a mass surveillance system. He also asks what would Fauci have done during the lockdowns with Flock cameras? Flock cameras are an upgrade to the governments "lockdown system" and the they will try to use them again for lockdown 2.0. I think Glenn makes a misstep when he says the cameras must be used constitutionally. There is no way to use them constitutionally - they record without a warrant by default. The only way these tools can conform to the constitution is to remove them and not use them. Lastly, FOX repeats the lie that Flock cameras data is deleted in 30 days. Flock contractually obligates clients keep cameras live and recording and has even turned them back on in municipalities that have tried to shut them down. Flock wants the data above all else and that implies they are keeping the data permanently and selling the data illegally.

Orwell Day

25,952 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Flock cameras have become a hot topic. James Fishback breaks down why they have fallen under scrutiny: “They should be opposed to Flock cameras because it's the government spying on us. And I believe, as a constitutional conservative, that the government should know next to nothing about us, but we should know almost everything about the government. And so what Flock cameras do, there are 4,000 and counting here in Florida. They're not just on our roads. They're outside of our churches, our parks, our playgrounds. Even hiking trails have them. It allows the government to track you wherever you are. And we don't want that.”

Flock cameras have become a hot topic. James Fishback breaks down why they have fallen under scrutiny: “They should be opposed to Flock cameras because it's the government spying on us. And I believe, as a constitutional conservative, that the government should know next to nothing about us, but we should know almost everything about the government. And so what Flock cameras do, there are 4,000 and counting here in Florida. They're not just on our roads. They're outside of our churches, our parks, our playgrounds. Even hiking trails have them. It allows the government to track you wherever you are. And we don't want that.”

The DeVory Darkins Show

20,786 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Port St. Lucie voted to remove Flock cameras from their county. When they went to remove the cameras, they found 14 extra Flock cameras in their county. They never authorized these cameras and don't know who installed them. But if we had to guess, it would seem Flock itself put them up. No one else could benefit, as the data these cameras collect only feed into the Flock network. So we know with near-absolute certainty they put up the extra cameras; the next question is why. If they only make money selling their subscription service, putting up free cameras makes no sense. The only logical conclusion? They make money selling the data. So much money that it's worth putting up the cameras for free.

Port St. Lucie voted to remove Flock cameras from their county. When they went to remove the cameras, they found 14 extra Flock cameras in their county. They never authorized these cameras and don't know who installed them. But if we had to guess, it would seem Flock itself put them up. No one else could benefit, as the data these cameras collect only feed into the Flock network. So we know with near-absolute certainty they put up the extra cameras; the next question is why. If they only make money selling their subscription service, putting up free cameras makes no sense. The only logical conclusion? They make money selling the data. So much money that it's worth putting up the cameras for free.

Orwell Day

24,511 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

He starts out by saying "this is going to be an unpopular opinion, but I want more flock cameras!" And then he proceeds to set the meeting on fire. He wants flock cameras in every commissioner's office, every sheriff's office, in front of their homes, monitoring their cell phone activity, and on and on and on. It's wonderful!

He starts out by saying "this is going to be an unpopular opinion, but I want more flock cameras!" And then he proceeds to set the meeting on fire. He wants flock cameras in every commissioner's office, every sheriff's office, in front of their homes, monitoring their cell phone activity, and on and on and on. It's wonderful!

Leah Rain ✝️🇺🇸🎸🏝️

543,935 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This is one of the craziest Flock camera stories you’ve heard so far. They caught an officer using Flock camera to track and stalk his ex and the new love interest of the X. Then they find out the Internal Affair Detective who was investigating the entire thing, he had also misused Flock cameras over 20 times to track people as well. There is no way we can let this continue. Ban the Flock cameras now.

This is one of the craziest Flock camera stories you’ve heard so far. They caught an officer using Flock camera to track and stalk his ex and the new love interest of the X. Then they find out the Internal Affair Detective who was investigating the entire thing, he had also misused Flock cameras over 20 times to track people as well. There is no way we can let this continue. Ban the Flock cameras now.

Derrick Evans

62,938 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Police Officers are using Flock cameras to stalk women when they see them in their cars ----- See a woman you like? Is she in her car? If you're a police officer you can just grab her license plate and use the Flock camera system to stalk her all over town. The Flock camera system will eventually lead to an innocent person being r*ped or worse, and probably much more than once, if it hasn't already happened. And what about the lies? Never forget that Flock representative Josh Thomas told investigative journalist Brendan Keefe from InvestigateTV that Flock cameras DO NOT track people.

Police Officers are using Flock cameras to stalk women when they see them in their cars ----- See a woman you like? Is she in her car? If you're a police officer you can just grab her license plate and use the Flock camera system to stalk her all over town. The Flock camera system will eventually lead to an innocent person being r*ped or worse, and probably much more than once, if it hasn't already happened. And what about the lies? Never forget that Flock representative Josh Thomas told investigative journalist Brendan Keefe from InvestigateTV that Flock cameras DO NOT track people.

Orwell Day

28,807 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Americans even in rural towns are saying they are under surveillance by Flock Cameras “I pass 8 Flock cameras on the way to my kids' school — 2 stoplights, but 8 Flock cameras. I live in a rural county. I'm passing more surveillance cameras than I am businesses. That's insane” “So yeah, surveillance state coming to a rural county near you” This is the surveillance state being established Many people think there are just a few flock cameras being put up in counties, but that’s not the case. The amount of cameras would shock you Harris County Sheriff’s Office has access to 480 Flock cameras The greater Houston area has nearly 3,800 Flock cameras installed across the region This is mass surveillance

Americans even in rural towns are saying they are under surveillance by Flock Cameras “I pass 8 Flock cameras on the way to my kids' school — 2 stoplights, but 8 Flock cameras. I live in a rural county. I'm passing more surveillance cameras than I am businesses. That's insane” “So yeah, surveillance state coming to a rural county near you” This is the surveillance state being established Many people think there are just a few flock cameras being put up in counties, but that’s not the case. The amount of cameras would shock you Harris County Sheriff’s Office has access to 480 Flock cameras The greater Houston area has nearly 3,800 Flock cameras installed across the region This is mass surveillance

Wall Street Apes

133,362 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Have you been to Home Depot recently? This Denver location has Flock cameras at each of the entrances to the parking lot! I can only imagine that Home Depot has a contract with Flock to collect and sell the data of every car that comes into their parking lot....

Have you been to Home Depot recently? This Denver location has Flock cameras at each of the entrances to the parking lot! I can only imagine that Home Depot has a contract with Flock to collect and sell the data of every car that comes into their parking lot....

FreeStateColorado

14,825 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

If only they had Flock cameras during Covid… the lockdowns would have been so much more effective and easy to enforce. Patriot Act… FISA courts… Jan. 6 shows you exactly what the government will do with enhanced and unchecked surveillance powers. The absence of Flock cameras is not the cause of revolving door bail. It’s not the cause of repeat offenders released from jail, who committed a disproportionate amount of the violent crime. And the abuse we have already seen from Flock cameras ought to be sufficient evidence to remove any lingering doubt as to where this is going.

If only they had Flock cameras during Covid… the lockdowns would have been so much more effective and easy to enforce. Patriot Act… FISA courts… Jan. 6 shows you exactly what the government will do with enhanced and unchecked surveillance powers. The absence of Flock cameras is not the cause of revolving door bail. It’s not the cause of repeat offenders released from jail, who committed a disproportionate amount of the violent crime. And the abuse we have already seen from Flock cameras ought to be sufficient evidence to remove any lingering doubt as to where this is going.

Viva Frei

23,867 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

This is horrifying New information shows the Flock cameras wants to work with Uber and Lyft to have their millions of dash cams send all that live data back to flock “An incredibly dystopian Flock proposition just got leaked today. 404 Media released an article on it. Now, we all know Flock is bad, but even myself, I don't think we're cognizant on how much worse it could get and how quickly. In this leak, it detailed a presentation that Flock showed to the Georgia AG, trying to convince them to let them link to all Uber and Lyft cars, over three hundred and fifty thousand of them. Now, what you might not know is that every single Uber and Lyft has to have a live dash cam built into their car. So Flock wanted to link with those and have them start scanning plates and link it back to the Flock system. Now, this did not happen, but that's not to say it won't “ Uber and Lyft cameras already capture clear license-plate video and generate trillions of images Flock wanted to pull plate data and vehicle fingerprint details from those mobile cameras This would mean instead of only fixed pole-mounted ALPRs at intersections, you’d have 350,000+ to potentially millions of moving cameras filling gaps across cities and regions in near real time The ultimate mass surveillance live network

This is horrifying New information shows the Flock cameras wants to work with Uber and Lyft to have their millions of dash cams send all that live data back to flock “An incredibly dystopian Flock proposition just got leaked today. 404 Media released an article on it. Now, we all know Flock is bad, but even myself, I don't think we're cognizant on how much worse it could get and how quickly. In this leak, it detailed a presentation that Flock showed to the Georgia AG, trying to convince them to let them link to all Uber and Lyft cars, over three hundred and fifty thousand of them. Now, what you might not know is that every single Uber and Lyft has to have a live dash cam built into their car. So Flock wanted to link with those and have them start scanning plates and link it back to the Flock system. Now, this did not happen, but that's not to say it won't “ Uber and Lyft cameras already capture clear license-plate video and generate trillions of images Flock wanted to pull plate data and vehicle fingerprint details from those mobile cameras This would mean instead of only fixed pole-mounted ALPRs at intersections, you’d have 350,000+ to potentially millions of moving cameras filling gaps across cities and regions in near real time The ultimate mass surveillance live network

Wall Street Apes

137,617 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Flock Safety Cameras are no longer being used just as license plate readers or traffic safety This flock camera is a playground, there is no traffic to monitor. I found local governments are now just placing Flock cameras in areas where they believe crime risks might be higher Which means they are no just straight up being used for mass surveillance of Americans without a warrant This is the surveillance and police state being established Again, these are no longer just traffic cameras they’re being used for surveillance Ban them nationwide

Flock Safety Cameras are no longer being used just as license plate readers or traffic safety This flock camera is a playground, there is no traffic to monitor. I found local governments are now just placing Flock cameras in areas where they believe crime risks might be higher Which means they are no just straight up being used for mass surveillance of Americans without a warrant This is the surveillance and police state being established Again, these are no longer just traffic cameras they’re being used for surveillance Ban them nationwide

Wall Street Apes

214,470 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

WOAH 🚨 Senator Josh Hawley says that Flock Safety Cameras admitted to him in a private message they are saving images of every American inside their vehicles and they can search those images BY PEOPLE, not license plate Hawley says this is a mass surveillance network like we’ve never seen being setup right here in America at a very shockingly fast pace He says Flock is also searchable by bumper stickers on vehicles, like Trump stickers or NRA or pro-life or anything. Flock is using AI to be able to identify people down to the bumper stickers on their cars, even dents “Flock's cameras can even recognize whether people are in the images. And in fact, Flock admitted in a letter to me ahead of this hearing that you could search their database based on people's images. You could ask to search people, images that had people, images that are scanning the the inside of the cars. I mean, this is really quite extraordinary” “What seems to make these networks unique is not just the sheer number of cameras, it's the fact that they're all linked together and powered and searchable by AI. It's unlike anything we've ever seen in this country before — They store and catalog details like the vehicle's make, model, color, location, date, time. Flock's searchable features include details like dents and roof cracks and vehicle damage and racks on the roof or racks on the back or specific bumper stickers even. You think about that. I mean, Flock can tell you if a car has a Trump sticker or a Harris sticker or a Pro-Life America sticker or an NRA sticker. It's really quite extraordinary.” Just so you can get a sense of how truly vast the mass surveillance network already is in America with Flock cameras I included the current September 2026 map of all Flock cameras installed. It is insane Why is this being allowed to happen

WOAH 🚨 Senator Josh Hawley says that Flock Safety Cameras admitted to him in a private message they are saving images of every American inside their vehicles and they can search those images BY PEOPLE, not license plate Hawley says this is a mass surveillance network like we’ve never seen being setup right here in America at a very shockingly fast pace He says Flock is also searchable by bumper stickers on vehicles, like Trump stickers or NRA or pro-life or anything. Flock is using AI to be able to identify people down to the bumper stickers on their cars, even dents “Flock's cameras can even recognize whether people are in the images. And in fact, Flock admitted in a letter to me ahead of this hearing that you could search their database based on people's images. You could ask to search people, images that had people, images that are scanning the the inside of the cars. I mean, this is really quite extraordinary” “What seems to make these networks unique is not just the sheer number of cameras, it's the fact that they're all linked together and powered and searchable by AI. It's unlike anything we've ever seen in this country before — They store and catalog details like the vehicle's make, model, color, location, date, time. Flock's searchable features include details like dents and roof cracks and vehicle damage and racks on the roof or racks on the back or specific bumper stickers even. You think about that. I mean, Flock can tell you if a car has a Trump sticker or a Harris sticker or a Pro-Life America sticker or an NRA sticker. It's really quite extraordinary.” Just so you can get a sense of how truly vast the mass surveillance network already is in America with Flock cameras I included the current September 2026 map of all Flock cameras installed. It is insane Why is this being allowed to happen

Wall Street Apes

605,672 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Angie Nixon: “Ashley Moody is a tool and a pawn for big corporations. AI data centers? $2.5M that we know about, they’re funding Ashley Moody. They’re trying to make sure that she wins because they want to destroy your communities, they want to take your land, jack your utility rates up. She’s also fully supportive of Flock cameras. I do not want to defund the police, I want to defund Flock cameras so bad cops don’t get to stalk their girlfriends or their boyfriends. She is fully on board with Flock cameras”

Angie Nixon: “Ashley Moody is a tool and a pawn for big corporations. AI data centers? $2.5M that we know about, they’re funding Ashley Moody. They’re trying to make sure that she wins because they want to destroy your communities, they want to take your land, jack your utility rates up. She’s also fully supportive of Flock cameras. I do not want to defund the police, I want to defund Flock cameras so bad cops don’t get to stalk their girlfriends or their boyfriends. She is fully on board with Flock cameras”

Marco Foster

14,531 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

“Why do they need to know where every American is at ALL TIMES?!” Jesse Watters pushes back on Flock cameras, questioning how much privacy Americans should have to give up in the name of public safety.

“Why do they need to know where every American is at ALL TIMES?!” Jesse Watters pushes back on Flock cameras, questioning how much privacy Americans should have to give up in the name of public safety.

The Five

21,852 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A FOIA request revealed that, in just one town, 3rd parties (credit card companies, cell phone companies, alphabet agencies, retailers, foreign governments, etc...) accessed camera data more than 500,000 times in a 9 week period. "Flock Safety could not guarantee that it's not sharing information with federal agencies." No shit. Several municipalities in CT are "turning off" their Flock cameras in response to what one FOIA request revealed. The problem - the towns don't control/own the cameras nor the data they collect so they can't turn them off. They can instruct their employees to not access them but Flock, a private company funded *almost exclusively* (outside of people like Marc Andreessen & his ilk) by taxpayer dollars, owns the devices and the data. Plan accordingly... #rural #CT #police #crime #PoliceState #4thAmendment #14thAmendment #CivilRights #ALPR #cops #stalking #women #windsor #flock #SurveillanceState

A FOIA request revealed that, in just one town, 3rd parties (credit card companies, cell phone companies, alphabet agencies, retailers, foreign governments, etc...) accessed camera data more than 500,000 times in a 9 week period. "Flock Safety could not guarantee that it's not sharing information with federal agencies." No shit. Several municipalities in CT are "turning off" their Flock cameras in response to what one FOIA request revealed. The problem - the towns don't control/own the cameras nor the data they collect so they can't turn them off. They can instruct their employees to not access them but Flock, a private company funded almost exclusively (outside of people like Marc Andreessen & his ilk) by taxpayer dollars, owns the devices and the data. Plan accordingly... #rural #CT #police #crime #PoliceState #4thAmendment #14thAmendment #CivilRights #ALPR #cops #stalking #women #windsor #flock #SurveillanceState

Mrgunsngear

205,258 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

WOW 🚨 Records requests show The city of Fullerton, California secretly approved Flock Cameras without a single public hearing or notice to the public, they approved it under a separate project name - The city signed a contract with Glassbox Digital - A calendar item for a contract with Glassbox Digital appeared on the agenda, it did not mention Flock - The details of that item involved an agenda item ‘Peregrine Services’ - Peregrine offered a Fullerton crimes data center that would integrate data from body-worn cameras, automatic license plate readers, utility systems and Flock Safety cameras - The item passed unanimously on the consent calendar with no discussion, no questions - This authorized Flock under a 5 year contract for $750,000 - The police chief then authorized Flock a 5 year term that auto renews every 2 years without a single vote or any public input This is how they secretly approved flock cameras without ever notifying the public or allowing a single question to be asked…. “That's how it got here. We got Flock because council rubber-stamped a consent calendar item that was never talked about with the public, that never mentioned Flock to the public, that never brought up any details with the public” “I'd actually like to point out Mrs. Charles over here because I find it laughable that you would go to No Kings protest to fight against tyranny and rubber-stamp the surveillance state of our citizenry without asking a single question about how the data is held, who it's given to, who has access to it, who does and does not weaponize it. Because there's an old Soviet proverb that says, "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime." And that's why these systems are being built. So shame on the council at the time and shame on everybody who pretends to care about our rights who did nothing about it” The Fullerton police department claims there are only 19 flock cameras but independent organizations claim the number is much higher, they believe the real number is closer to 52 flock cameras

WOW 🚨 Records requests show The city of Fullerton, California secretly approved Flock Cameras without a single public hearing or notice to the public, they approved it under a separate project name - The city signed a contract with Glassbox Digital - A calendar item for a contract with Glassbox Digital appeared on the agenda, it did not mention Flock - The details of that item involved an agenda item ‘Peregrine Services’ - Peregrine offered a Fullerton crimes data center that would integrate data from body-worn cameras, automatic license plate readers, utility systems and Flock Safety cameras - The item passed unanimously on the consent calendar with no discussion, no questions - This authorized Flock under a 5 year contract for $750,000 - The police chief then authorized Flock a 5 year term that auto renews every 2 years without a single vote or any public input This is how they secretly approved flock cameras without ever notifying the public or allowing a single question to be asked…. “That's how it got here. We got Flock because council rubber-stamped a consent calendar item that was never talked about with the public, that never mentioned Flock to the public, that never brought up any details with the public” “I'd actually like to point out Mrs. Charles over here because I find it laughable that you would go to No Kings protest to fight against tyranny and rubber-stamp the surveillance state of our citizenry without asking a single question about how the data is held, who it's given to, who has access to it, who does and does not weaponize it. Because there's an old Soviet proverb that says, "Show me the man and I'll show you the crime." And that's why these systems are being built. So shame on the council at the time and shame on everybody who pretends to care about our rights who did nothing about it” The Fullerton police department claims there are only 19 flock cameras but independent organizations claim the number is much higher, they believe the real number is closer to 52 flock cameras

Wall Street Apes

105,323 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat