正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

The theory of evolution is bullshit. Period. Can’t find one evolutionist who can explain why apes still exist. What, are all the other apes absolutely retarded? They just can’t figure this evolution thing out? These are the same people who will point towards snakes having legs at one point...

RealAbs1776's profile picture

Paul Fleuret

63,051 subscribers

254,922 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

"We evolved from apes!" April Fools! If you believe that we evolved from apes, congratulations—you'll believe anything! The idea that humans descended from apes is simply ridiculous. They claim we share a common ancestor, but no one has been able to show the actual link. Why? Because it doesn’t exist. That’s why it’s still called the “missing link.” It’s not science; it’s merely a guess dressed up as fact. Think about what they’re asking you to believe: somehow, over millions of years, one kind of creature slowly turned into something completely different, apes into humans. Not just walking upright but building cities, writing music, and understanding right and wrong. That’s not evolution; that’s a miracle. And miracles don’t come from random chance. If this theory were true, we’d see the in-between stages everywhere. But we don’t. There are no half-human, half-ape creatures walking around today or preserved in the fossil record. Just big gaps and excuses. The truth is, most people believe this nonsense because it’s been repeated so many times in school and in the media that they have stopped asking questions. It shows how easy it is to program people with a lie when it’s sold as “science.” Use your brain. Let's go further. There is also not a single proven, observable example of one creature becoming an entirely different kind of creature through evolution, as humans are said to have evolved from apes. We have see adaptations, not transformations.
1:07

"We evolved from apes!" April Fools! If you believe that we evolved from apes, congratulations—you'll believe anything! The idea that humans descended from apes is simply ridiculous. They claim we share a common ancestor, but no one has been able to show the actual link. Why? Because it doesn’t exist. That’s why it’s still called the “missing link.” It’s not science; it’s merely a guess dressed up as fact. Think about what they’re asking you to believe: somehow, over millions of years, one kind of creature slowly turned into something completely different, apes into humans. Not just walking upright but building cities, writing music, and understanding right and wrong. That’s not evolution; that’s a miracle. And miracles don’t come from random chance. If this theory were true, we’d see the in-between stages everywhere. But we don’t. There are no half-human, half-ape creatures walking around today or preserved in the fossil record. Just big gaps and excuses. The truth is, most people believe this nonsense because it’s been repeated so many times in school and in the media that they have stopped asking questions. It shows how easy it is to program people with a lie when it’s sold as “science.” Use your brain. Let's go further. There is also not a single proven, observable example of one creature becoming an entirely different kind of creature through evolution, as humans are said to have evolved from apes. We have see adaptations, not transformations.

Mr. Anderson

45,802 次观看 • 1 年前

.Naval: You have a beautiful definition of knowledge, which most people don’t even try to tackle, about how knowledge perpetuates itself in the environment. You gave some really good examples. One was around genes. Successful, highly adapted genes contain a lot of knowledge and can cause themselves to be replicated because they’re survivors. In the same way, knowledge itself is a survivor, in that if you transmit to me the knowledge of how to build a computer, it’s an incredibly useful thing. I’m going to build more and more computers and that knowledge will be passed on. Your underlying point that you repeated here was if you want to understand the physical universe you have to understand knowledge, because it is the thing that over time takes over and changes more and more the universe—more than almost anything else. You have to understand all the explanations behind it. You can’t just say “particle collisions” because that explains everything, so it explains nothing. It’s not a useful level to operate at. Therefore, the things that create knowledge are uniquely influential in the universe. And as far as we know, there are only two systems that create knowledge. There’s evolution and there are humans. But is there a difference even between these two forms of knowledge creation, between evolution and between humans? David Deutsch: Yes. I have argued that the human way of creating knowledge is the ultimate one, that there aren’t any more powerful ones than that. This is the argument against the supernatural. Assuming that there is a form of knowledge creation that’s more powerful than ours is equivalent to invoking the supernatural, which is therefore a bad explanation—as invoking the supernatural always is. The difference between biological evolution and human creative thought is that biological evolution is inherently limited in its range. That’s because biological evolution has no foresight. It can’t see a problem and conjecture a solution. Whenever biological evolution produces a solution to something, it’s always before natural selection has even begun. This is Charles Darwin’s insight. This is the difference between Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution and the other theories of evolution that had been around for a century or more before that, including Charles Darwin’s grandfather and Lamarck. The thing they didn’t get is that the creation of knowledge in evolution begins before. That means that biological evolution can’t reach places that are not reachable by successive improvements, each of which allows a viable organism to exist. Creationists say that biological evolution has, in fact, reached things that are not reachable by incremental steps, each of which is a viable organism. They’re factually mistaken. The thing which they have in mind is the idea of a creator who can imagine things that don’t exist and who can create an idea that is not the culmination of a whole load of viable things. A thinking being can create something that’s a culmination of a whole load of non-viable things. Explanatory creativity makes humans unique Out of all the billions and billions of species that have ever existed, none of them has ever made a campfire, even though many of them would’ve been helped by having the genetic capacity to make campfires. The reason it didn’t happen in the biosphere is that there is no such thing as making a partially functional campfire; whereas there is, for example, with making hot water. The bombardier beetles squirt boiling water at their enemies. You can easily see that just squirting cold water at your enemies is not totally unhelpful. Then making it a bit hotter and a bit hotter. Squirting boiling water no doubt required many adaptations to make sure the beetle didn’t boil itself while it was making this boiling water. That happened because there was a sequence of steps in between, all of which were useful. But with campfires, it’s very hard to see how that could happen. Humans have explanatory creativity. Once you have that, you can get to the moon. You can cause asteroids which are heading towards the earth to turn around and go away. Perhaps no other planet in the universe has that power, and it has it only because of the presence of explanatory creativity on it.
4:31

.Naval: You have a beautiful definition of knowledge, which most people don’t even try to tackle, about how knowledge perpetuates itself in the environment. You gave some really good examples. One was around genes. Successful, highly adapted genes contain a lot of knowledge and can cause themselves to be replicated because they’re survivors. In the same way, knowledge itself is a survivor, in that if you transmit to me the knowledge of how to build a computer, it’s an incredibly useful thing. I’m going to build more and more computers and that knowledge will be passed on. Your underlying point that you repeated here was if you want to understand the physical universe you have to understand knowledge, because it is the thing that over time takes over and changes more and more the universe—more than almost anything else. You have to understand all the explanations behind it. You can’t just say “particle collisions” because that explains everything, so it explains nothing. It’s not a useful level to operate at. Therefore, the things that create knowledge are uniquely influential in the universe. And as far as we know, there are only two systems that create knowledge. There’s evolution and there are humans. But is there a difference even between these two forms of knowledge creation, between evolution and between humans? David Deutsch: Yes. I have argued that the human way of creating knowledge is the ultimate one, that there aren’t any more powerful ones than that. This is the argument against the supernatural. Assuming that there is a form of knowledge creation that’s more powerful than ours is equivalent to invoking the supernatural, which is therefore a bad explanation—as invoking the supernatural always is. The difference between biological evolution and human creative thought is that biological evolution is inherently limited in its range. That’s because biological evolution has no foresight. It can’t see a problem and conjecture a solution. Whenever biological evolution produces a solution to something, it’s always before natural selection has even begun. This is Charles Darwin’s insight. This is the difference between Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution and the other theories of evolution that had been around for a century or more before that, including Charles Darwin’s grandfather and Lamarck. The thing they didn’t get is that the creation of knowledge in evolution begins before. That means that biological evolution can’t reach places that are not reachable by successive improvements, each of which allows a viable organism to exist. Creationists say that biological evolution has, in fact, reached things that are not reachable by incremental steps, each of which is a viable organism. They’re factually mistaken. The thing which they have in mind is the idea of a creator who can imagine things that don’t exist and who can create an idea that is not the culmination of a whole load of viable things. A thinking being can create something that’s a culmination of a whole load of non-viable things. Explanatory creativity makes humans unique Out of all the billions and billions of species that have ever existed, none of them has ever made a campfire, even though many of them would’ve been helped by having the genetic capacity to make campfires. The reason it didn’t happen in the biosphere is that there is no such thing as making a partially functional campfire; whereas there is, for example, with making hot water. The bombardier beetles squirt boiling water at their enemies. You can easily see that just squirting cold water at your enemies is not totally unhelpful. Then making it a bit hotter and a bit hotter. Squirting boiling water no doubt required many adaptations to make sure the beetle didn’t boil itself while it was making this boiling water. That happened because there was a sequence of steps in between, all of which were useful. But with campfires, it’s very hard to see how that could happen. Humans have explanatory creativity. Once you have that, you can get to the moon. You can cause asteroids which are heading towards the earth to turn around and go away. Perhaps no other planet in the universe has that power, and it has it only because of the presence of explanatory creativity on it.

Deutsch Explains

186,329 次观看 • 1 年前

15% of the humans have Rh negative blood and scientists have no idea where it came from. What they do believe is that if you have that you may have been evolved from a different kind of species on this planet. Where did Rh negative evolve from? Some people speculate it could be linked to Alien Hybrid Breeding Program. Rh negative blood was only in Europe before the 15th century. It did not exist in the Americas, southern Africa or Asia until colonization spread it. This definitely challenges the 'Out of Africa' theory.
0:49

15% of the humans have Rh negative blood and scientists have no idea where it came from. What they do believe is that if you have that you may have been evolved from a different kind of species on this planet. Where did Rh negative evolve from? Some people speculate it could be linked to Alien Hybrid Breeding Program. Rh negative blood was only in Europe before the 15th century. It did not exist in the Americas, southern Africa or Asia until colonization spread it. This definitely challenges the 'Out of Africa' theory.

Interstellar

18,786 次观看 • 1 个月前

Izhak Bentov explains the evolution of the soul, where we are currently, and where we can find those who were born more evolved and before their time. He says you can find them in the 'Mental Hospitals.' They perceive the broader reality, they see more than us, they can peek into the higher dimensions, and communicate with beings that we can't perceive. Many of them are not able to function in the current society they were born into; they were meant to exist in different conditions. Some of them who can function are the geniuses of our modern time like Newton, Tesla, etc... However, one thing I don't agree with Bentov about is that this evolution occurs slowly and takes millions and millions of years; it's not. Evolution is driven by cyclical events and great catastrophic events. Evolution happens under great stress, activating the 'Junk' DNA. Bentov agrees that you can speed up the process with Eastern techniques to accelerate evolution. Well, the ancient, Eastern, and religious techniques for enlightenment are based on high levels of stress, ego death, and out-of-body experiences. I have written about these techniques.
2:31

Izhak Bentov explains the evolution of the soul, where we are currently, and where we can find those who were born more evolved and before their time. He says you can find them in the 'Mental Hospitals.' They perceive the broader reality, they see more than us, they can peek into the higher dimensions, and communicate with beings that we can't perceive. Many of them are not able to function in the current society they were born into; they were meant to exist in different conditions. Some of them who can function are the geniuses of our modern time like Newton, Tesla, etc... However, one thing I don't agree with Bentov about is that this evolution occurs slowly and takes millions and millions of years; it's not. Evolution is driven by cyclical events and great catastrophic events. Evolution happens under great stress, activating the 'Junk' DNA. Bentov agrees that you can speed up the process with Eastern techniques to accelerate evolution. Well, the ancient, Eastern, and religious techniques for enlightenment are based on high levels of stress, ego death, and out-of-body experiences. I have written about these techniques.

Open Minded Approach

62,610 次观看 • 2 年前

"Lineage against lineage mindset is incompatible with the weaponry at our disposal. It is incompatible with a world in which we share an atmosphere and oceans and elements of our food supply. One thing that's true about evolution is that evolution is about genes trying to get into the future, but genes have liberated human beings to reinterpret the landscape. The genes can't figure out what to do about novel puzzles that they haven't encountered before, but a human mind can... This is the point at which we are going to take control over this thing because our chances are far better if we do this consciously than if we allow our instincts to drive. Our instincts are going to end up in a frankly global genocidal conflict that benefits absolutely no one." - Bret Weinstein from "Staring Down Blackmail: Talking RFK Jr. with Charles Eisenstein," published on April 5, 2025 and available wherever you subscribe to podcasts
12:05

"Lineage against lineage mindset is incompatible with the weaponry at our disposal. It is incompatible with a world in which we share an atmosphere and oceans and elements of our food supply. One thing that's true about evolution is that evolution is about genes trying to get into the future, but genes have liberated human beings to reinterpret the landscape. The genes can't figure out what to do about novel puzzles that they haven't encountered before, but a human mind can... This is the point at which we are going to take control over this thing because our chances are far better if we do this consciously than if we allow our instincts to drive. Our instincts are going to end up in a frankly global genocidal conflict that benefits absolutely no one." - Bret Weinstein from "Staring Down Blackmail: Talking RFK Jr. with Charles Eisenstein," published on April 5, 2025 and available wherever you subscribe to podcasts

The Darkhorse Podcast

251,933 次观看 • 1 年前

Dean Radin: "Aliens are from earth 1 million years in the past - They are ultra terrestrial" 👽 "Why do we have Nordic Aliens that look like people in Scandinavia? They are either from an earth like planet or they are from here" The Parapsychologist told Joe Rogan these aren't extraterrestrials from another planet. They're ultraterrestrials. Advanced beings that evolved here on Earth alongside us, millions of years ahead. "They're not from the future, they're from the past. They just happen to be way more advanced than we thought." Radin points to convergent evolution as an explanation.
2:58

Dean Radin: "Aliens are from earth 1 million years in the past - They are ultra terrestrial" 👽 "Why do we have Nordic Aliens that look like people in Scandinavia? They are either from an earth like planet or they are from here" The Parapsychologist told Joe Rogan these aren't extraterrestrials from another planet. They're ultraterrestrials. Advanced beings that evolved here on Earth alongside us, millions of years ahead. "They're not from the future, they're from the past. They just happen to be way more advanced than we thought." Radin points to convergent evolution as an explanation.

Interstellar

440,932 次观看 • 1 个月前

The fight against infectious disease has been one of the most important driving forces in human evolution. So you might expect that evolution has optimised our immune system, and there won't be much low-hanging fruit for improving this with science. But bacteria and viruses evolve so quickly that evolution is constantly racing just to keep up. It doesn't have time to optimise perfectly. Case in point: Our primate ancestors used to have built-in genetic defence against HIV-like viruses. But at some point, the gene was repurposed to protect against a different virus that posed more of a threat. That virus has since disappeared, but our genome is still protecting against it - and failing to protect us against HIV. The good news is that we should expect there to be many opportunities where science can do better than evolution.
2:03

The fight against infectious disease has been one of the most important driving forces in human evolution. So you might expect that evolution has optimised our immune system, and there won't be much low-hanging fruit for improving this with science. But bacteria and viruses evolve so quickly that evolution is constantly racing just to keep up. It doesn't have time to optimise perfectly. Case in point: Our primate ancestors used to have built-in genetic defence against HIV-like viruses. But at some point, the gene was repurposed to protect against a different virus that posed more of a threat. That virus has since disappeared, but our genome is still protecting against it - and failing to protect us against HIV. The good news is that we should expect there to be many opportunities where science can do better than evolution.

Dwarkesh Patel

25,007 次观看 • 1 个月前

Proof that Life is Intelligently Designed: Proteins. They do everything in your cells that keeps you alive. These microscopic molecules must have been created. Here is why: Proteins are the building blocks of all the little nano-machines that make up your cells. They do all the major work in your body - from creating energy to recycling waste. Proteins are made from amino acids connected into a specific sequence and then folded into a functional shape. You can think of a protein like a paragraph, and amino acids as the individual letters that spell out the words. Here is where it gets interesting... There are just 20 amino acids used in all of Life. Just 20 amino acids. Responsible for ~200 million unique proteins making up tens of thousands of cell types across Life. And scientists are constantly finding new ones. Scientists categorize proteins into Families. Protein Families are groups of proteins that share amino acid sequence similarities. There are ~22,000 Protein Families. Here's the part that screams they are designed... Protein Families have no evolutionary history. Even evolutionist scientists agree - they are absolutely unique. It's been said that proteins are like stars in a galaxy, and families are like galaxies, with vast empty space between them. Evolution is supposed to build by tweaking things that already exist. But no evolutionary history connects fundamentally distinct protein families. Experiments have been done to intentionally evolve one protein family into another. They fail every time. One protein family cannot be evolved into another. They cannot arise through evolution. But the math really makes it impossible... The odds of evolution finding even a single functional protein family is 1 chance in 10^77 possible amino acid sequences. That's a 1 with 77 zeroes. The odds of evolution finding 22,000 distinct protein families? Roughly 1 chance in 10^1,694,000. You don't need to be a mathematician to understand that this is impossible. Evolution works by random mutations tweaking what's already there. But protein families can't evolve from one another. And the math makes it absolutely absurd to believe. Monkeys banging on keyboards will never type out Shakespeare. And random mutations in sequences of amino acids could never create a single functional protein family. There is only one thing we know of that creates functionally specified sequences: Intelligence. Now here is the final cherry on top: Proteins are built by other proteins, assembled into a complex machine to do a job in cells. The assembly instructions for those proteins and the machines are found in DNA. But DNA requires protein machines for replication & repair. So DNA is required to make Proteins... ...but Proteins are required to make DNA *and* more Proteins. You can't have one without the other. They rely on each other. Which means one couldn't have evolved and then waited for the other. They couldn't do anything without each other. They had to be created at the same time to function together. Life was Divinely Designed. Proteins prove it.
0:38

Proof that Life is Intelligently Designed: Proteins. They do everything in your cells that keeps you alive. These microscopic molecules must have been created. Here is why: Proteins are the building blocks of all the little nano-machines that make up your cells. They do all the major work in your body - from creating energy to recycling waste. Proteins are made from amino acids connected into a specific sequence and then folded into a functional shape. You can think of a protein like a paragraph, and amino acids as the individual letters that spell out the words. Here is where it gets interesting... There are just 20 amino acids used in all of Life. Just 20 amino acids. Responsible for ~200 million unique proteins making up tens of thousands of cell types across Life. And scientists are constantly finding new ones. Scientists categorize proteins into Families. Protein Families are groups of proteins that share amino acid sequence similarities. There are ~22,000 Protein Families. Here's the part that screams they are designed... Protein Families have no evolutionary history. Even evolutionist scientists agree - they are absolutely unique. It's been said that proteins are like stars in a galaxy, and families are like galaxies, with vast empty space between them. Evolution is supposed to build by tweaking things that already exist. But no evolutionary history connects fundamentally distinct protein families. Experiments have been done to intentionally evolve one protein family into another. They fail every time. One protein family cannot be evolved into another. They cannot arise through evolution. But the math really makes it impossible... The odds of evolution finding even a single functional protein family is 1 chance in 10^77 possible amino acid sequences. That's a 1 with 77 zeroes. The odds of evolution finding 22,000 distinct protein families? Roughly 1 chance in 10^1,694,000. You don't need to be a mathematician to understand that this is impossible. Evolution works by random mutations tweaking what's already there. But protein families can't evolve from one another. And the math makes it absolutely absurd to believe. Monkeys banging on keyboards will never type out Shakespeare. And random mutations in sequences of amino acids could never create a single functional protein family. There is only one thing we know of that creates functionally specified sequences: Intelligence. Now here is the final cherry on top: Proteins are built by other proteins, assembled into a complex machine to do a job in cells. The assembly instructions for those proteins and the machines are found in DNA. But DNA requires protein machines for replication & repair. So DNA is required to make Proteins... ...but Proteins are required to make DNA *and* more Proteins. You can't have one without the other. They rely on each other. Which means one couldn't have evolved and then waited for the other. They couldn't do anything without each other. They had to be created at the same time to function together. Life was Divinely Designed. Proteins prove it.

Divinely Designed

18,886 次观看 • 1 个月前

Ossoff: There at some point is going to be a reckoning for all of this. These folks who are working at these private prison companies, who are on Kristi Noem staff right now, they are at some point going to have to testify under oath about what is happening in the facilities that they're currently running.
1:42

Ossoff: There at some point is going to be a reckoning for all of this. These folks who are working at these private prison companies, who are on Kristi Noem staff right now, they are at some point going to have to testify under oath about what is happening in the facilities that they're currently running.

Acyn

29,913 次观看 • 11 个月前

Most people were taught Darwin’s theory of evolution explains how all life came to be. What if that’s not the full story? Stephen C. Meyer says growing evidence is challenging that idea, and many scientists are now calling for a new theory of evolution. “There’s a huge difference between the idea that natural selection is a real process… and the claim that it has unlimited creative power.” “Many leading evolutionary biologists today are now calling for a new theory of evolution.” “They recognize that the mutation natural selection mechanism has limited creative power.” “It does a nice job of explaining small-scale variation and adaptation.” “But it doesn’t do a good job of explaining… major new body plans or new forms.” Stephen C. Meyer
2:20

Most people were taught Darwin’s theory of evolution explains how all life came to be. What if that’s not the full story? Stephen C. Meyer says growing evidence is challenging that idea, and many scientists are now calling for a new theory of evolution. “There’s a huge difference between the idea that natural selection is a real process… and the claim that it has unlimited creative power.” “Many leading evolutionary biologists today are now calling for a new theory of evolution.” “They recognize that the mutation natural selection mechanism has limited creative power.” “It does a nice job of explaining small-scale variation and adaptation.” “But it doesn’t do a good job of explaining… major new body plans or new forms.” Stephen C. Meyer

Jan Jekielek

77,498 次观看 • 3 个月前

.Jacob Kimmel thinks that the functionality to reverse aging already exists in our epigenome. But then why didn't evolution already optimize for longevity? Jacob explains that if you consider evolution as an optimizer, the gradients flow in a really surprising way. Naively, it seems like evolution should want you to live longer (more time to have babies and care for your kin). Jacob explains 3 complications on the naive picture: 1. Baseline mortality was brutal throughout most of history. Even without aging, you'd likely die from infection, predation, or accident before reaching 50. So there's no signal flowing back from 100 to the genome which incentivizes some selective process to make you live longer, even if it was easy to do. 2. There's selection against fixing just one (but not at all) causes of aging). Because then you have some grandpa who's slightly healthier but still a worse use of resources than the next generation from the gene's eye point of view. 3. Evolution is very limited as an optimizer. The step size (number of variants you can test in parallel) is limited by your step size. And through the most of history, this bandwidth was dominated by selective pressures much more urgent than de-aging (for example, building a better immune system to fight infectious diseases). Full episode with Jacob Kimmel out Thursday. So excited about this one. Jacob's simple 3-point list led to more than half an hour of random digressions, from how many antibiotics were naturally evolved, to how hard evolution actually optimized for intelligence, to how we can actually detect the evidence for some deadly ancestor of HIV in our genome.
1:45

.Jacob Kimmel thinks that the functionality to reverse aging already exists in our epigenome. But then why didn't evolution already optimize for longevity? Jacob explains that if you consider evolution as an optimizer, the gradients flow in a really surprising way. Naively, it seems like evolution should want you to live longer (more time to have babies and care for your kin). Jacob explains 3 complications on the naive picture: 1. Baseline mortality was brutal throughout most of history. Even without aging, you'd likely die from infection, predation, or accident before reaching 50. So there's no signal flowing back from 100 to the genome which incentivizes some selective process to make you live longer, even if it was easy to do. 2. There's selection against fixing just one (but not at all) causes of aging). Because then you have some grandpa who's slightly healthier but still a worse use of resources than the next generation from the gene's eye point of view. 3. Evolution is very limited as an optimizer. The step size (number of variants you can test in parallel) is limited by your step size. And through the most of history, this bandwidth was dominated by selective pressures much more urgent than de-aging (for example, building a better immune system to fight infectious diseases). Full episode with Jacob Kimmel out Thursday. So excited about this one. Jacob's simple 3-point list led to more than half an hour of random digressions, from how many antibiotics were naturally evolved, to how hard evolution actually optimized for intelligence, to how we can actually detect the evidence for some deadly ancestor of HIV in our genome.

Dwarkesh Patel

257,862 次观看 • 11 个月前

Adam Carolla brutally explains why The View can’t afford to have one well-informed person on the panel. It’s not that Whoopi and the crew would lose one argument. They would lose EVERY argument. Because “four people who are wrong still can’t match the one person who is right.” CAROLLA: “Here’s the problem [with The View]. The problem is they have horrible, ill-sorted, bad ideas that are either just sort of lies or they don’t really comport with any reality.” “They go, well, ‘J6 was 10 times worse than the Summer of Love.’ And then they all nod, and there’s not one person there that raises their hand and goes, ‘What the f*ck are you talking about? That’s insane.’” “But if there is one person who actually has facts and data… you will watch ONE PERSON WHOOP UP ON FOUR PEOPLE. Because four people who are wrong still can’t match the one person who is right.” “So they can’t have somebody who’s going to show up with a lot of information.”
0:53

Adam Carolla brutally explains why The View can’t afford to have one well-informed person on the panel. It’s not that Whoopi and the crew would lose one argument. They would lose EVERY argument. Because “four people who are wrong still can’t match the one person who is right.” CAROLLA: “Here’s the problem [with The View]. The problem is they have horrible, ill-sorted, bad ideas that are either just sort of lies or they don’t really comport with any reality.” “They go, well, ‘J6 was 10 times worse than the Summer of Love.’ And then they all nod, and there’s not one person there that raises their hand and goes, ‘What the f*ck are you talking about? That’s insane.’” “But if there is one person who actually has facts and data… you will watch ONE PERSON WHOOP UP ON FOUR PEOPLE. Because four people who are wrong still can’t match the one person who is right.” “So they can’t have somebody who’s going to show up with a lot of information.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

588,714 次观看 • 2 个月前

. Dan Bongino explains there are people within the administration working against Trump and his agenda. They are gearing up for their own political runs. That much is clear. He makes a very important point here, why are all the leaks specifically designed to push the narrative that Trump doesn’t control his own administration? That is not a leftist talking point because the left doesn’t care if he controls the administration or not all they care about is dunking on the administration. This is a talking point from the walk right because the woke Wright wants to remake the Republican Party and remake the agenda the way they do that is by pretending like when Trump tells you this is his agenda. He doesn’t really mean it because he’s just not powerful enough to stand up to whoever’s running the show. They say this without an iota of proof, and then they leaked stories that make it more plausible for you to believe that, even though every single one of these stories blows up in their face. Who are the leakers? A lot of people have a lot of great ideas as to who they really are based on the money movement and the campaigns that are being prepared for takeoff as soon as possible for the 2028 election cycle. I have learned this year that politics is the single dirtiest most disgusting game that exists, and the lengths to which people will go will shock you and I am a person who is already jaded about the entire political arena. That being said, this is still the single greatest country in the world, and we have to fight for the agenda that we voted for and not give up.
6:40

. Dan Bongino explains there are people within the administration working against Trump and his agenda. They are gearing up for their own political runs. That much is clear. He makes a very important point here, why are all the leaks specifically designed to push the narrative that Trump doesn’t control his own administration? That is not a leftist talking point because the left doesn’t care if he controls the administration or not all they care about is dunking on the administration. This is a talking point from the walk right because the woke Wright wants to remake the Republican Party and remake the agenda the way they do that is by pretending like when Trump tells you this is his agenda. He doesn’t really mean it because he’s just not powerful enough to stand up to whoever’s running the show. They say this without an iota of proof, and then they leaked stories that make it more plausible for you to believe that, even though every single one of these stories blows up in their face. Who are the leakers? A lot of people have a lot of great ideas as to who they really are based on the money movement and the campaigns that are being prepared for takeoff as soon as possible for the 2028 election cycle. I have learned this year that politics is the single dirtiest most disgusting game that exists, and the lengths to which people will go will shock you and I am a person who is already jaded about the entire political arena. That being said, this is still the single greatest country in the world, and we have to fight for the agenda that we voted for and not give up.

Insurrection Barbie

21,260 次观看 • 2 个月前

James Tour is one of the most respected and widely-cited organic chemists in the world. He considers the story of evolution that we’ve all been taught an absurd fairytale. Here’s why. (0:00) How Dr. Tour Sees God Through Science (6:00) Why the Scientific Community Lost All Their Credibility (12:44) What Is Life? (14:47) Has Man Actually Created Life in a Lab? (30:36) What Is Cloning? (31:32) Is a Genetically Engineered Super Human Race Being Created? (40:14) What Really Is the Theory of Evolution? (44:30) Is This Evidence of God Creating Earth? (55:46) The Attacks Against Dr. Tour for Questioning Evolution (1:03:42) Is the Theory of Evolution Being Used as a Weapon Against God? (1:08:47) What Is the Purpose of Sleeping? (1:17:07) How Jesus Christ Saved Dr. Tour (1:36:30) Are People Becoming More Aware of God? Includes paid partnerships.
1:44:29

James Tour is one of the most respected and widely-cited organic chemists in the world. He considers the story of evolution that we’ve all been taught an absurd fairytale. Here’s why. (0:00) How Dr. Tour Sees God Through Science (6:00) Why the Scientific Community Lost All Their Credibility (12:44) What Is Life? (14:47) Has Man Actually Created Life in a Lab? (30:36) What Is Cloning? (31:32) Is a Genetically Engineered Super Human Race Being Created? (40:14) What Really Is the Theory of Evolution? (44:30) Is This Evidence of God Creating Earth? (55:46) The Attacks Against Dr. Tour for Questioning Evolution (1:03:42) Is the Theory of Evolution Being Used as a Weapon Against God? (1:08:47) What Is the Purpose of Sleeping? (1:17:07) How Jesus Christ Saved Dr. Tour (1:36:30) Are People Becoming More Aware of God? Includes paid partnerships.

Tucker Carlson

2,527,235 次观看 • 7 个月前

‘Wars end with the exhaustion of one of the sides. We are still a long way from that’ – Merz cynically calls for fighting Russia to the last Ukrainian. ‘I remind you again and again, if you look at history – how do wars end? Usually they end because of the economic or military exhaustion of one of the sides – or both. And we are still, in all likelihood, a long way from that point in the current war. And so I assume that we may have to prepare for a longer conflict. But this in no way changes our determination to support Ukraine’
0:39

‘Wars end with the exhaustion of one of the sides. We are still a long way from that’ – Merz cynically calls for fighting Russia to the last Ukrainian. ‘I remind you again and again, if you look at history – how do wars end? Usually they end because of the economic or military exhaustion of one of the sides – or both. And we are still, in all likelihood, a long way from that point in the current war. And so I assume that we may have to prepare for a longer conflict. But this in no way changes our determination to support Ukraine’

Zlatti71

96,963 次观看 • 1 年前

.Andrej Karpathy says that LLMs currently lack the cultural accumulation and self-play that propelled humans out of the savannah: Culture: > “Why can’t an LLM write a book for the other LLMs? Why can’t other LLMs read this LLM’s book and be inspired by it, or shocked by it?” Self play: > “It’s extremely powerful. Evolution has a lot of competition driving intelligence and evolution. AlphaGo is playing against itself and that’s how it learns to get really good at Go. There’s no equivalent of self-play in LLMs. Why can’t an LLM, for example, create a bunch of problems that another LLM is learning to solve? Then the LLM is always trying to serve more and more difficult problems.” I asked Karpathy why LLMs still aren't yet able to build up culture the way humans do. > “The dumber models remarkably resemble a kindergarten student. [The smartest models still feel like] elementary school students though. Somehow, we still haven’t graduated enough where [these models] can take over. My Claude Code or Codex, they still feel like this elementary-grade student. I know that they can take PhD quizzes, but they still cognitively feel like a kindergarten.” > “I don’t think they can create culture because they’re still kids. They’re savant kids. They have perfect memory. They can convincingly create all kinds of slop that looks really good. But I still think they don’t really know what they’re doing. They don’t really have the cognition across all these little checkboxes that we still have to collect.”
1:55

.Andrej Karpathy says that LLMs currently lack the cultural accumulation and self-play that propelled humans out of the savannah: Culture: > “Why can’t an LLM write a book for the other LLMs? Why can’t other LLMs read this LLM’s book and be inspired by it, or shocked by it?” Self play: > “It’s extremely powerful. Evolution has a lot of competition driving intelligence and evolution. AlphaGo is playing against itself and that’s how it learns to get really good at Go. There’s no equivalent of self-play in LLMs. Why can’t an LLM, for example, create a bunch of problems that another LLM is learning to solve? Then the LLM is always trying to serve more and more difficult problems.” I asked Karpathy why LLMs still aren't yet able to build up culture the way humans do. > “The dumber models remarkably resemble a kindergarten student. [The smartest models still feel like] elementary school students though. Somehow, we still haven’t graduated enough where [these models] can take over. My Claude Code or Codex, they still feel like this elementary-grade student. I know that they can take PhD quizzes, but they still cognitively feel like a kindergarten.” > “I don’t think they can create culture because they’re still kids. They’re savant kids. They have perfect memory. They can convincingly create all kinds of slop that looks really good. But I still think they don’t really know what they’re doing. They don’t really have the cognition across all these little checkboxes that we still have to collect.”

Dwarkesh Patel

261,224 次观看 • 9 个月前

‼️Is Winning The Point of Everything (w/ Osita Nwanevu)‼️ "You wrote a book about how there are all of these avenues to increase democracy -- filibuster reforms, gerrymandering reforms, Supreme Court reforms -- that have been available to Democrats that they've chosen not to use....So what is, what is your theory of why they have not availed themselves of those possibilities?"
2:55

‼️Is Winning The Point of Everything (w/ Osita Nwanevu)‼️ "You wrote a book about how there are all of these avenues to increase democracy -- filibuster reforms, gerrymandering reforms, Supreme Court reforms -- that have been available to Democrats that they've chosen not to use....So what is, what is your theory of why they have not availed themselves of those possibilities?"

Briahna Joy Gray

41,253 次观看 • 8 个月前

Why do I say “there’s no such thing as trans people?” We are all fully embodied whole human beings. Our bodies are ourselves. They are the root fact of our experience. There is no other way to experience ourselves except as embodied beings. Transgenderism is at direct odds with a foundational understanding of ourselves as embodied beings.
4:25

Why do I say “there’s no such thing as trans people?” We are all fully embodied whole human beings. Our bodies are ourselves. They are the root fact of our experience. There is no other way to experience ourselves except as embodied beings. Transgenderism is at direct odds with a foundational understanding of ourselves as embodied beings.

Amy E. Sousa, MA Depth Psychology

84,669 次观看 • 1 年前

The more I learn about DNA and the inner workings of our cells, the more I’m convinced that there is a Creator/Force/God. You can call it what you want but to think it’s all just “evolution”, the result of natural selection, seems absolutely absurd to me. I am not saying evolution isn’t real but I am saying that our understanding about the nature of our reality and where we come from is sorely lacking. We like to tell ourselves the “we know the truth”, but the correct answer is that we really don’t know at all. Human origins is the mystery of all mysteries and our arrogance instead of reverence for that mystery is a big reason why evil has gained such a foothold in our world in my opinion. What do you think? Evolution explains it or something else is at play? I don’t claim to know the truth but instinctually feel our explanations are fundamentally flawed. Watch this stunning animation that explains how our DNA is tightly packed up and tell me you are not left with a sense of wonder for the mysterious nature of it all.
6:35

The more I learn about DNA and the inner workings of our cells, the more I’m convinced that there is a Creator/Force/God. You can call it what you want but to think it’s all just “evolution”, the result of natural selection, seems absolutely absurd to me. I am not saying evolution isn’t real but I am saying that our understanding about the nature of our reality and where we come from is sorely lacking. We like to tell ourselves the “we know the truth”, but the correct answer is that we really don’t know at all. Human origins is the mystery of all mysteries and our arrogance instead of reverence for that mystery is a big reason why evil has gained such a foothold in our world in my opinion. What do you think? Evolution explains it or something else is at play? I don’t claim to know the truth but instinctually feel our explanations are fundamentally flawed. Watch this stunning animation that explains how our DNA is tightly packed up and tell me you are not left with a sense of wonder for the mysterious nature of it all.

Champagne Joshi

149,527 次观看 • 2 年前

Sequoia's Carl Eschenbach on the founder traits that matter most when scaling a company: "One of the things I absolutely look for is self-awareness in founders, and are they honest about what they’re good at? Because a lot of these founders are just incredibly intelligent human beings, and sometimes they think they can do everything. Do they have the self-awareness to say, 'I need to go get other people as part of the company to help me scale so I can focus on what I’m really good at?'" "There are attributes and characteristics of people that I look for that are way beyond the intelligence side of the equation. You can’t teach grit. You can’t teach drive. You can’t teach a great attitude. You can’t teach determination." "All of those are things that are innate and part of people, and you want to see that in these founders. When you find someone who has that passion, drive, desire, and relentless ability to fight through challenges, issues, and opportunities — and then they have the intellectual horsepower on the other side — when that comes together, that’s a beautiful thing."
1:43

Sequoia's Carl Eschenbach on the founder traits that matter most when scaling a company: "One of the things I absolutely look for is self-awareness in founders, and are they honest about what they’re good at? Because a lot of these founders are just incredibly intelligent human beings, and sometimes they think they can do everything. Do they have the self-awareness to say, 'I need to go get other people as part of the company to help me scale so I can focus on what I’m really good at?'" "There are attributes and characteristics of people that I look for that are way beyond the intelligence side of the equation. You can’t teach grit. You can’t teach drive. You can’t teach a great attitude. You can’t teach determination." "All of those are things that are innate and part of people, and you want to see that in these founders. When you find someone who has that passion, drive, desire, and relentless ability to fight through challenges, issues, and opportunities — and then they have the intellectual horsepower on the other side — when that comes together, that’s a beautiful thing."

TBPN

15,950 次观看 • 4 个月前