Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

the thing that makes Opus 4.5 special is you can vibe code forever without it losing the plot. i vibe coded an iOS app this weekend that any frontier model could build in one shot. but the special thing about Opus is i kept adding features and fixing bugs... show more

Dan Shipper 📧

102,843 subscribers

85,253 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

BREAKING NEWS: Anthropic just dropped Claude Ops 4.5!! It is by FAR the best coding model I've ever used. We've been testing it internally Every 📧 for the last few days, and it is an absolute paradigm shift for any kind of coding task. It extends the horizon of what you can vibe code The current generation of new models—Anthropic’s Sonnet 4.5, Google’s Gemini 3, or OpenAI’s Codex Max 5.1—can all competently build a minimum viable product in one shot, or fix a highly technical bug autonomously. But eventually, if you kept pushing them to vibe code more, they’d start to trip over their own feet: The code would be convoluted and contradictory, and you’d get stuck in endless bugs. We have not found that limit yet with Opus 4.5—it seems to be able to vibe code forever. Takes working in parallel to a whole new level because it's far better at planning and coding, it can work with more autonomy—meaning you can do more in parallel without breaking anything . Kieran Klaassen worked on 11 different projects in six hours—and had good results on all of them. Great at design iteration Opus 4.5 is incredibly skilled at iterating through a design autonomously using an MCP like Playwright. previous models would lose the thread after a few cycles, or say a design was done when it wasn't. Opus 4.5 is incredible at autonomously iterating until a design is pixel perfect. we have a full 4,000 word vibe check on Every 📧 right now with everything we tested:

BREAKING NEWS: Anthropic just dropped Claude Ops 4.5!! It is by FAR the best coding model I've ever used. We've been testing it internally Every 📧 for the last few days, and it is an absolute paradigm shift for any kind of coding task. It extends the horizon of what you can vibe code The current generation of new models—Anthropic’s Sonnet 4.5, Google’s Gemini 3, or OpenAI’s Codex Max 5.1—can all competently build a minimum viable product in one shot, or fix a highly technical bug autonomously. But eventually, if you kept pushing them to vibe code more, they’d start to trip over their own feet: The code would be convoluted and contradictory, and you’d get stuck in endless bugs. We have not found that limit yet with Opus 4.5—it seems to be able to vibe code forever. Takes working in parallel to a whole new level because it's far better at planning and coding, it can work with more autonomy—meaning you can do more in parallel without breaking anything . Kieran Klaassen worked on 11 different projects in six hours—and had good results on all of them. Great at design iteration Opus 4.5 is incredibly skilled at iterating through a design autonomously using an MCP like Playwright. previous models would lose the thread after a few cycles, or say a design was done when it wasn't. Opus 4.5 is incredible at autonomously iterating until a design is pixel perfect. we have a full 4,000 word vibe check on Every 📧 right now with everything we tested:

Dan Shipper 📧

272,699 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Claude Code with Opus 4.7 is the best vibe coding tool I've ever used The thing is there were several new features that change how you should be using it In this video I cover 7 secret updates the creator of Claude Code just revealed If you use Claude Code this is a must watch

Claude Code with Opus 4.7 is the best vibe coding tool I've ever used The thing is there were several new features that change how you should be using it In this video I cover 7 secret updates the creator of Claude Code just revealed If you use Claude Code this is a must watch

Alex Finn

37,096 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: Clone any successful company Claude Code Opus 4.6 in Shipper can take any app and make it yours: design, code, business plan... you can now ship the next duolingo / twitter / airbnb / etc this is THE END of vibe coding.

🚨 BREAKING: Clone any successful company Claude Code Opus 4.6 in Shipper can take any app and make it yours: design, code, business plan... you can now ship the next duolingo / twitter / airbnb / etc this is THE END of vibe coding.

Shipper

243,186 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Claude Code with Sonnet 4.5 is actually incredible I gave it a prompt for a super complex app, and it one shot the entire thing In this video I walk you through how to use Claude Code to build a prompt library app you can start using immediately (no coding experience required):

Claude Code with Sonnet 4.5 is actually incredible I gave it a prompt for a super complex app, and it one shot the entire thing In this video I walk you through how to use Claude Code to build a prompt library app you can start using immediately (no coding experience required):

Alex Finn

40,955 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Claude Code w/ Opus 4.5 is the single greatest AI tool ever made It allows ANYONE to build out any app you can think of even with 0 coding experience If you've never use Opus before you're screwing up In this video I give you the COMPLETE Claude Code beginner's guide:

Claude Code w/ Opus 4.5 is the single greatest AI tool ever made It allows ANYONE to build out any app you can think of even with 0 coding experience If you've never use Opus before you're screwing up In this video I give you the COMPLETE Claude Code beginner's guide:

Alex Finn

66,313 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Introducing the first Full-Stack Vibe Coding Platform powered by Claude Code. Not only can you build a professional mobile app that accepts payments and ship it to the app store... As of today you can build a web app and deploy it to the internet with one click. In celebration of 5000 vibe coded apps published to the app store, we're giving away a free month of vibe coding for those who reply to this post. Reply and we'll DM you credits 👇

Introducing the first Full-Stack Vibe Coding Platform powered by Claude Code. Not only can you build a professional mobile app that accepts payments and ship it to the app store... As of today you can build a web app and deploy it to the internet with one click. In celebration of 5000 vibe coded apps published to the app store, we're giving away a free month of vibe coding for those who reply to this post. Reply and we'll DM you credits 👇

Chorus.com

786,887 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

I built a form-filling agent that anyone can use 💫 This is an extremely simple but useful (I hope) app. Upload a fillable form 📋, some context files, and chat with the agent to fill the form out automatically ✍️ 1️⃣ Yes it is a Claude Code SDK wrapper 2️⃣ It is better and faster than ChatGPT/Claude UI out of the box 3️⃣ We use LlamaParse to parse the context files, so you can have more trust that we are able to read context without hallucinations (e.g. messy scanned handwriting, drivers license photo, and more). This was one of my holiday Claude Code vibe-coding projects. Built with Opus 4.5, and also powered by Opus 4.5. Feeling the AGI 🫡 App is here: Repo is open-source:

I built a form-filling agent that anyone can use 💫 This is an extremely simple but useful (I hope) app. Upload a fillable form 📋, some context files, and chat with the agent to fill the form out automatically ✍️ 1️⃣ Yes it is a Claude Code SDK wrapper 2️⃣ It is better and faster than ChatGPT/Claude UI out of the box 3️⃣ We use LlamaParse to parse the context files, so you can have more trust that we are able to read context without hallucinations (e.g. messy scanned handwriting, drivers license photo, and more). This was one of my holiday Claude Code vibe-coding projects. Built with Opus 4.5, and also powered by Opus 4.5. Feeling the AGI 🫡 App is here: Repo is open-source:

Jerry Liu

48,430 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

TBPN

443,119 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Claude Opus 4.5 is the most powerful AI model ever released It allows you to build apps with 0 technical knowledge needed You MUST try it In this video I go over how to get the most out of Opus and how to build incredible apps with it, even if you've never coded before:

Claude Opus 4.5 is the most powerful AI model ever released It allows you to build apps with 0 technical knowledge needed You MUST try it In this video I go over how to get the most out of Opus and how to build incredible apps with it, even if you've never coded before:

Alex Finn

32,627 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Haven't seen any demos of using vibe coding to prototype gadgets like this So I made one. Everything here is generated with code Parts of the code and logic can even be reused on a Raspberry Pi to build the real thing Some tips ↓

Haven't seen any demos of using vibe coding to prototype gadgets like this So I made one. Everything here is generated with code Parts of the code and logic can even be reused on a Raspberry Pi to build the real thing Some tips ↓

Dilum Sanjaya

116,619 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Right now on the App Store, there are tons of arcade games making $1M+ from ads. My million-dollar idea: I can vibe-code multiple games and turn them into TikTok, but for arcade games. I just tried vibe-coding a Pac-Man game and it was insanely simple. I could code it from scratch, but that would take about 1 month. Now it takes 5 minutes with just 3 simple steps: > Prompt it with GPT-5 > Build it using Opus 4.5 on Rork > Shipped from my phone I honestly think that combined with good TikTok marketing, making $10k–$50k/month from ads is totally realistic because TikTok users love free stuff. Bruh… AI genuinely surprised me.

Right now on the App Store, there are tons of arcade games making $1M+ from ads. My million-dollar idea: I can vibe-code multiple games and turn them into TikTok, but for arcade games. I just tried vibe-coding a Pac-Man game and it was insanely simple. I could code it from scratch, but that would take about 1 month. Now it takes 5 minutes with just 3 simple steps: > Prompt it with GPT-5 > Build it using Opus 4.5 on Rork > Shipped from my phone I honestly think that combined with good TikTok marketing, making $10k–$50k/month from ads is totally realistic because TikTok users love free stuff. Bruh… AI genuinely surprised me.

Alex Nguyen

72,381 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Let's break it down. This time, I started with an empty Xcode project. Claude 4 one-shotted a fully working iOS app that can list and create posts (with a good UX) and read/write to a database. It compiled the app and took a screenshot to confirm that it's working. One prompt.

Let's break it down. This time, I started with an empty Xcode project. Claude 4 one-shotted a fully working iOS app that can list and create posts (with a good UX) and read/write to a database. It compiled the app and took a screenshot to confirm that it's working. One prompt.

Thomas Ricouard

163,573 просмотров • 1 год назад

Opus 4.5 is absolutely goated. I built AN ENTIRE VIDEO EDITING APPLICATION FOR WINDOWS IN ABOUT AN HOUR. No tricks. No special prompts, no prompt driven dev. Just me, Visual Studio Code, and Opus 4.5 having a convo via the mic. I feel like this is what we were promised, and it's here.

Opus 4.5 is absolutely goated. I built AN ENTIRE VIDEO EDITING APPLICATION FOR WINDOWS IN ABOUT AN HOUR. No tricks. No special prompts, no prompt driven dev. Just me, Visual Studio Code, and Opus 4.5 having a convo via the mic. I feel like this is what we were promised, and it's here.

Burke Holland

124,433 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

$I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)$

I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)

Ian Nuttall

194,949 просмотров • 1 год назад

Can SHAQ vibe code an app with no coding experience? Vibe coding is easy to start with, but like any other skill, you can learn to master it. That’s why we partnered with Tade Oyerinde 🇺🇸 and the @campusgrad team to build Vibe Coding 101 for folks who want to master Replit.

Can SHAQ vibe code an app with no coding experience? Vibe coding is easy to start with, but like any other skill, you can learn to master it. That’s why we partnered with Tade Oyerinde 🇺🇸 and the @campusgrad team to build Vibe Coding 101 for folks who want to master Replit.

Amjad Masad

598,217 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

She a real one… she kept it down and never gave the wrong vibe or energy that suggested she was confused or needing attention. She great and that dude is definitely doing something right.

She a real one… she kept it down and never gave the wrong vibe or energy that suggested she was confused or needing attention. She great and that dude is definitely doing something right.

Dr. God Abeg ooo

651,351 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

BREAKING: GPT-5.5 "Spud" is out and it is a BEAST We've been testing it Every 📧 for the last 3 weeks on everything from coding, to writing, to knowledge work. Here's our day 0 vibe check: - It's a step change in coding AND it's easy to talk to. It's fast and friendly and quickly became my daily driver. But it's also a coding powerhouse—a really rare combination. - It scored 62/100 on our Senior Engineer benchmark. Opus 4.7 scored only a 33/100. (But GPT-5.5 performed best when using an Opus 4.7 plan). Naveen Naidu used over 900 million tokens during testing—and it let him ship production features for Monologue at both high speed and quality. - It has serious conceptual clarity. It can hold a complex plan in its head over hours of work, without getting distracted by existing code. This makes it the first model that we've tested that can perform well on complex refactors requiring deleting and reimagining an substantial existing codebase. - It's a very good writer. This is the first OpenAI model in about a year that got our writers Every 📧 to switch away from Claude. 5.5 has Katie Parrott's seal of approval—not an easy task. Its writing feels more organic and it's better at mimicking a writing style without going overboard. - It's great for agentic knowledge-work. This is the first OpenAI model that manages to be both a stellar senior engineer AND that can be used for everything from spreadsheets to research. It's crazy fast, and it's amazing inside of the Codex desktop app, and got much of our team to switch away from Claude Code and Cowork during the testing period. However, it's not a perfect model. - 5.5 still loses to Opus 4.7 on plan quality. It's plans are extremely readable but Opus has better attention to detail and sharper insight. - 5.5 still loses to Opus 4.7 by a bit on front-end and full-stack product work. Kieran Klaassen found that it wasn't quite as good when full-stack thinking and design are involved. And it's not great writing Ruby. - 5.5 is a great vibe coder but if you're vibe coding without a plan it's worse than Opus. Mike Taylor found that Opus is better at reading in between the lines on underspecified vibe-coding tasks. Overall GPT-5.5 is a massive achievement from OpenAI and it deserves a serious look as your daily driver. Read our full vibe check on Every 📧 here:

BREAKING: GPT-5.5 "Spud" is out and it is a BEAST We've been testing it Every 📧 for the last 3 weeks on everything from coding, to writing, to knowledge work. Here's our day 0 vibe check: - It's a step change in coding AND it's easy to talk to. It's fast and friendly and quickly became my daily driver. But it's also a coding powerhouse—a really rare combination. - It scored 62/100 on our Senior Engineer benchmark. Opus 4.7 scored only a 33/100. (But GPT-5.5 performed best when using an Opus 4.7 plan). Naveen Naidu used over 900 million tokens during testing—and it let him ship production features for Monologue at both high speed and quality. - It has serious conceptual clarity. It can hold a complex plan in its head over hours of work, without getting distracted by existing code. This makes it the first model that we've tested that can perform well on complex refactors requiring deleting and reimagining an substantial existing codebase. - It's a very good writer. This is the first OpenAI model in about a year that got our writers Every 📧 to switch away from Claude. 5.5 has Katie Parrott's seal of approval—not an easy task. Its writing feels more organic and it's better at mimicking a writing style without going overboard. - It's great for agentic knowledge-work. This is the first OpenAI model that manages to be both a stellar senior engineer AND that can be used for everything from spreadsheets to research. It's crazy fast, and it's amazing inside of the Codex desktop app, and got much of our team to switch away from Claude Code and Cowork during the testing period. However, it's not a perfect model. - 5.5 still loses to Opus 4.7 on plan quality. It's plans are extremely readable but Opus has better attention to detail and sharper insight. - 5.5 still loses to Opus 4.7 by a bit on front-end and full-stack product work. Kieran Klaassen found that it wasn't quite as good when full-stack thinking and design are involved. And it's not great writing Ruby. - 5.5 is a great vibe coder but if you're vibe coding without a plan it's worse than Opus. Mike Taylor found that Opus is better at reading in between the lines on underspecified vibe-coding tasks. Overall GPT-5.5 is a massive achievement from OpenAI and it deserves a serious look as your daily driver. Read our full vibe check on Every 📧 here:

Dan Shipper 📧

130,382 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

One thing I learned by working in an animation studio is that it is okay to place the model sheet on your canvas; it allows you to keep characters’ proportions and saves you time.

One thing I learned by working in an animation studio is that it is okay to place the model sheet on your canvas; it allows you to keep characters’ proportions and saves you time.

Psicoyote

50,788 просмотров • 1 год назад

I built an app with Claude Opus 4.5, then animated it with this new tool I found... This new iOS design workflow let me animate a character for my onboarding. Here it is: 1. build the app using Claude Code within 2. entered image of my mascot into 3. copied animation code from there back into vibecode

I built an app with Claude Opus 4.5, then animated it with this new tool I found... This new iOS design workflow let me animate a character for my onboarding. Here it is: 1. build the app using Claude Code within 2. entered image of my mascot into 3. copied animation code from there back into vibecode

Emily Lambert

290,886 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад