Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

The Treasury CS John Mbadi is not misunderstood. He is calculated. In rural gatherings, he traffics in ethnic resentment, selling Kikuyus as an enemy. In Nairobi, he shares budgets, contracts, and courtesy with the same people he demonises. This is not contradiction it is strategy. Hatred for the poor....

38,520 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

RUTO HAS DECLARED WAR ON TRUTH THIS IS HOW DESPERATE MEN RULE William Ruto is finished politically, and he knows it. This is not confidence. This is panic. This is a man watching his lies collapse in real time and realizing he can no longer talk his way out. He rose on deception. Hustler vs dynasty was a con. Bottom-up was a slogan, not a policy. Boda boda politics was emotional blackmail aimed at the poor. He studied pain, exploited it, and rode it to power. Now the same people he fooled have woken up and that terrifies him. Ruto has nothing left to sell. No record. No delivery. No relief. Only taxes, threats, arrogance, and broken institutions. Health is collapsing. Education is suffocating. Security is shaky. Cost of living is criminal. And instead of fixing anything, he chooses intimidation. So when Kenyans expose him online when facts outrun propaganda he reaches for the state hammer. NCIC Kenya is no longer a national institution. It is a rented tool of power. “Online monitoring” is not about hate speech; it is about surveillance. It is about silencing critics. It is about profiling dissent. It is about criminalizing opposition thinking before 2027. If this was really about hate speech, where was NCIC when Ruto abused Kalonzo? Where was it when his allies dragged Uhuru Kenyatta through the mud daily? Where was it when government bloggers spread tribal bile and lies? Nowhere. Because this is not regulation it is repression. Truth is not hate speech. Calling out corruption is not radicalization. Demanding free and fair elections is not harmful content. Ruto fears one thing: an informed Kenyan. He fears a population that remembers. He fears 2007 not because of violence but because it reminds him what happens when leaders steal elections and then try to silence outrage. This crackdown is a confession. It says: we plan to rig. It says: we expect resistance. It says: we are preparing to blame the people for our crimes. NIS agents monitoring citizens won’t create legitimacy. Abuse of commissions won’t buy trust. Threats won’t erase hunger. Intimidation won’t rewrite reality. History is brutal to leaders who mistake fear for control. Institutions rot when used as weapons. Presidents fall when they confuse criticism with rebellion. Ruto is not strong. He is exposed. He is not strategic. He is reactive. He is not in charge. He is cornered. And no amount of surveillance, intimidation, or manufactured fear will save a regime that has lost the people. You can jail voices. You can’t jail truth. You can crush institutions. You can’t crush memory. Kenyans are watching. And this time, they understand exactly how you operate.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇. 𝐎. 𝐍𝐄𝐊𝐎

27,048 views • 8 months ago

Luo Nation, look carefully at what is happening across Kenya. The Kipsigis community from the South Rift is meeting at Wamunyoro for consultations on the country's future. Communities are talking, listening to one another, and building alliances because they understand that no single community can change Kenya alone. My fellow Luos, we must not isolate ourselves while the rest of the country is finding common ground. That is exactly the kind of division those in power benefit from. Today, instead of building bridges, Gladys Wanga, Opiyo Wandayi, John Mbadi are encouraging tribal hostility and celebrating confrontation with anyone who questions President Ruto. Ask yourselves: who benefits when Luos and Kikuyus are turned against each other? It is certainly not the ordinary mwananchi struggling with the cost of living, unemployment, or poor public services. Political parties rise and fall. Luo Nation people is saying ODM no longer commands the broad national influence it once did, while other communities including Kamba, Kikuyu, Luhya, Kisii, and many Kalenjin are exploring new political partnerships. That is the reality of politics: it changes. Direction is more important than speed. Ordinary Luos are not asking for endless political battles. They are asking for jobs, affordable food, quality healthcare, better schools, and accountable leadership. Those are the conversations that should unite Kenyans. Do not abandon Kalonzo Musyoka simply because of tribal narratives. Judge every leader by their vision, integrity, and commitment to the country not by their surname or community. Kenya will only change if communities stand together instead of being pushed into fighting one another. The greatest fear of any politician is not one tribe. It is millions of Kenyans, from every community, speaking with one voice about the future they want. Let us reject hatred, reject tribal manipulation, and choose unity over division. That is how nations move forward.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇. 𝐎. 𝐍𝐄𝐊𝐎

14,177 views • 2 months ago

President William Ruto is no longer governing Kenya. He is protecting himself. When lies collapse, a clever conman does not apologise he divides. He has done it before. He is doing it again. In 2007, he weaponised Kalenjin pain against Kikuyu neighbours. Today, as president, he is engineering suspicion Luo, Luhya, Kalenjin vs Kikuyu not because tribes hate each other, but because a cornered man needs enemies to survive. Look closely: Luhyas are refusing. They say: we won’t be used. Kisiis are resisting. They say: our struggles are shared. Ordinary Kenyans are tired. They say: our problem is poverty, not tribes. So what does Ruto do? He reaches for the oldest, dirtiest tool in Kenyan politics: outsourcing tribal venom. He doesn’t shout it himself. He uses compromised Luo elites, desperate men with positions but no dignity, to spit poison on his behalf to provoke Kikuyu anger, to trigger fear, to recreate siege politics. Not because Kikuyus are the problem. Not because Luos are the problem. But because unity terrifies him. Three years in office. Nothing to show. What remains of the promises? Bottom–up? A slogan, not a system. Hustlers? Crushed by taxes, levies, licences, and police harassment. Cost of living? Worse than ever. Free healthcare? A lie buried in unpaid SHA bills. Wi-Fi in markets? A joke. Uplifting small traders? They’re closing shops. Pampers for newborns? Insulting theatrics while maternity wards collapse. Every promise was cheap marketing. Every rally was a sales pitch. Every speech was a con. Now that the lies are exposed, he has switched scripts. Yesterday it was Hustler Nation. Today it is Singapore. Same trick. New costume. Singapore had discipline, integrity, institutions, and consequences. Ruto offers none of that only debt, propaganda, and repression. You cannot build Singapore on: corruption without shame taxes without services debt without production tribal division without trust You don’t leapfrog from chaos to miracle by talking harder. This is the danger. A president who has failed economically will always try to survive ethnically. A leader who cannot deliver prosperity will manufacture fear. A man with nothing to show will always point fingers. Kenya is not broken because of Kikuyu. Kenya is not suffering because of Luo, Luhya, Kalenjin, or Kisii. Kenya is bleeding because it is being ruled by a man who mistakes manipulation for leadership and propaganda for vision. This is not about tribes. This is about truth vs deception. Competence vs conmanship. Unity vs manufactured hatred. History is watching. And it never spares leaders who rule by lies and division. No amount of slogans will save this project.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇 𝐍𝐄𝐊𝐎

71,067 views • 9 months ago

What the country is witnessing today is not leadership; it is the theatrics of deception. President William Ruto did not invent the NYOTA programme. He rebranded KYEOP, a World Bank–supported youth initiative that existed long before him, stripped it of its institutional discipline, and converted it into a personal political cash-dispensing roadshow. Money meant for structured youth empowerment has been reduced to handouts waved before desperate crowds, repackaged as presidential generosity. The WorldBank did not send money to Kenya so that a president could tour the country issuing down payments like a shylock. If the programme’s design estimates KSh 50,000 or KSh 100,000 per youth, why are young people being handed KSh 22,000, then instructed to “work with it” and patiently wait for a mythical Phase Two? Since when did empowerment begin with rationing hope? Worse still, the Auditor-General has raised serious red flags over unaccounted billions linked to the same programmes. This is not opposition noise. This is the constitutional office mandated to protect public resources asking hard questions that the government refuses to answer. Silence in the face of audit queries is not innocence; it is arrogance. Kenyans are poor but not stupid. They remember. Under Uhuru Kenyatta, businesses were stable. Money circulated. People worked. The economy breathed. Youth were not paraded like beggars at political rallies. Corruption did not vanish, but it feared exposure. Today, even the loudest “hustlers,” boda boda riders, and mama mbogas will quietly tell you the truth: money had value then. Today it evaporates in the hand. William Ruto is not suffering from a lack of ideas; he is a master manipulator who understands poverty well enough to weaponize it. He knows how to convert debt into applause, loans into lies, and grants into campaign slogans. He can excite hired crowds, choreographed chants, and bused supporters but that era is ending. For the first time, this is no longer government versus opposition. Funds sent to Kenya by the World Bank were meant for systematic youth empowerment, not presidential tours where cheques are waved before desperate young people like campaign tokens It is William Ruto versus the people. And no amount of stage-managed generosity will silence a nation that knows it is being played.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇 𝐍𝐄𝐊𝐎

21,206 views • 8 months ago

This is a painful but necessary record of truth. Samuel Atandi is not a village man. He works in Nairobi, lives in Nairobi, shops in Nairobi, and when he falls sick he is treated at Nairobi Hospital or Karen Hospital. His life is fully removed from the daily suffering of the people he claims to represent. Yet when politics demands poverty to be performed, he is forcefully flown back to Alego Usonga not with development, not with solutions, but with insults, lies, and loose change. Today in Alego Usonga, chang’aa sellers and consumers openly say that Ndindi Nyoro has pushed Atandi to distribute KSh 100 and 200 notes, moving from den to den, telling people not to listen to Kikuyus or anyone who dares to say Alego Usonga is poor and underdeveloped. Poverty has become something to deny, not to fix. Truth has become an enemy. In one of the most embarrassing political spectacles, Atandi carried six Kenya Power technicians from Kisumu. These men slept in a chang’aa den in Uradi. The following day, they “commissioned” an electric switch without poles, without transformers, without electricity. Villagers were lectured to clap and wait. They were told Wandayi would bring electricity later. They were told Mbadi would send money. This is not leadership. This is ritualistic deception. What followed was even more disturbing. The same people who have no roads, no functioning schools, no hospitals, and whose children either consume, sell, or brew achwaka village chang’aa, were instructed to clap and praise the government. They praised Ruto loudly. They were told to say the President is working, that things are improving, that suffering is normal, that development will come tomorrow. They clapped because they were paid to clap. They praised because they were instructed to praise. “Gimi chamo emi kuano” you only count what you have eaten. That single sentence explains the tragedy of Luo Nyanza politics. Applause is bought cheaply while dignity is lost daily. A people are trained to celebrate crumbs while their future is auctioned. Boda boda is presented as empowerment. The only assistance given is reflectors branded with Raila’s image, an orange, and the MP’s name human beings reduced to moving political billboards while poverty deepens. Ask those who know Siaya County: Ugunja Constituency is a mess Gem Constituency is a mess Bondo Constituency is a mess Alego Usonga, the headquarters of shame There are no roads. Schools are dilapidated. Hospitals are broken beyond recognition. Children are lost to drugs and illicit brew. And instead of answers, the people are fed hatred taught to abuse Kikuyus, to blame outsiders, to normalize suffering. Before Luo Nyanza is mobilized to insult Kikuyus in support of William Ruto, one simple question must be asked: How have ODM MPs served their people? Not promises. Not rallies. Not slogans. Tangible service. The truth is uncomfortable, but it must be said: Luo Nyanza is not poor because of Kikuyus. It is poor because of leaders who survive on patronage, deception, and emotional blackmail. Luos must think beyond clapping. Beyond coins. Beyond names. A community that praises Ruto in the morning, insults Kikuyus at noon, and sleeps hungry at night is not oppressed it is misled. This statement is not an attack. It is an indictment. And history will judge luos harshly.

𝙋𝘼𝙐𝙇. 𝐎. 𝐍𝐄𝐊𝐎

31,091 views • 8 months ago

There is a very small action in The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring that I find increasingly unsettling the more closely I look at it: when Saruman reveals the Palantír, Gandalf immediately pulls the cloth back over it. One man wants to look. The other wants to cover up the very thing that allows him to see more. Why? If the Palantír is a tool that allows someone to see across great distances, shouldn't a wise person want to know as much as possible? And yet this scene suggests a paradox: sometimes the danger does not lie in knowing too little, but in becoming too convinced that what we know is enough to draw a conclusion. Saruman is the clearest example of this. When he shows the Palantír to Gandalf, Saruman says: “I have seen it.” The sentence sounds like a declaration of knowledge. I have seen it. I know what is happening. I understand Sauron’s power. But that is precisely the problem: seeing one thing is not the same as seeing the whole truth. The Palantír gives Saruman a wider field of vision, but a wider field of vision does not necessarily mean a complete perspective. Saruman can see Sauron’s rising power, the scale of the threat, and things an ordinary person could never see. But he cannot see everything that will ultimately determine the outcome of the war. He does not see Frodo. He does not know how far a small Hobbit can go. He does not know how loyalty, friendship, sacrifice, and seemingly insignificant choices will shape the course of history. In other words, Saruman has more information, but that does not mean he possesses the whole truth. And this is where the Palantír becomes such an interesting image of the trap of knowledge. Because information does not draw conclusions by itself. Human beings do. Saruman sees that Sauron is powerful. From that, he reasons that Sauron will win. Then, from “will win,” he arrives at “cannot be resisted.” And finally: “We must join with him.” Notice the word “must.” Saruman does not say, “I want to stand with Sauron.” He says, “We must.” A personal choice is transformed into an inevitability imposed by reality itself. That is Saruman’s real tragedy. He does not need to stop thinking in order to become corrupted. On the contrary, he continues to reason. He continues to analyze. He continues to speak in the language of rationality. He even calls his choice wisdom: “It would be wise, my friend.” And this is where intelligence begins to become a trap. Saruman has constructed a chain of reasoning in which every path leads to the same conclusion: Sauron is too powerful, therefore resisting him is futile; if resistance is futile, then cooperation is the practical choice; and if that is the practical choice, then surrender can be called wisdom. He is no longer using reason to search for the truth. He is using reason to protect a conclusion he has already accepted. That is a particularly dangerous form of self-justification: when a person begins to call what they fear something they “must” do, and then calls their surrender “reason.” And this is why Gandalf’s reaction to the Palantír is so significant. He does not argue with Saruman that knowledge is bad. He simply says: “A Palantír is a dangerous tool.” Then he covers it. Gandalf understands something Saruman has forgotten: being wise does not mean always wanting to see more. It means knowing the limits of your own understanding. There are things we need to know. But there are also things we need to recognize that we cannot fully control in the way they affect us. Gandalf does not cover the Palantír because he is afraid of the truth. He covers it because he understands that not everything we can see should be looked at in whatever way we choose. Especially because Gandalf also says: “We do not know who else may be watching.” That line completely changes the meaning of the orb. The Palantír is not merely a window through which we can look out at the world. It is also a window through which someone else can look back at us. Saruman thinks he is using the tool to observe Sauron. But eventually, Saruman himself becomes trapped in a relationship he no longer controls. This is the paradox of power: we think we are holding the tool, until we realize that the tool has begun to shape the way we see the world. And from here, the two Wizards stand before the same problem but respond to it in completely different ways. Saruman looks at Sauron’s power and concludes: We cannot win. Gandalf looks at the same thing but refuses to accept that conclusion. Not because Gandalf knows for certain that they will win. But because he understands that no one has the right to turn a possibility into a destiny simply because they cannot yet see a way out. That is why Gandalf’s question cuts so deeply: “When did Saruman the Wise abandon reason for madness?” Gandalf does not ask: “When did you become evil?” He asks: “When did Saruman the Wise abandon reason?” Because Saruman’s fall begins with the very thing that once made him powerful: his intelligence. Intelligence itself is not the problem. The problem begins at the moment a person believes their intelligence has become great enough that they no longer need to question themselves. And perhaps that is what makes the Palantír such an intriguing symbol. It is an orb designed to see far into the distance. Yet the farther Saruman sees, the narrower his world becomes. He sees Sauron and no longer sees the possibility of resisting Sauron. He sees power and no longer sees courage. He sees war and no longer sees the small people who might change its outcome. Gandalf, meanwhile, sees less, but leaves room for more possibilities. And perhaps this is the deepest difference between the two. Saruman wants a complete view of the world so that he can be certain about the future. Gandalf accepts that the future cannot be seen in its entirety. One seeks certainty. The other accepts the limits of knowledge. And in Tolkien’s world, it is the second person who remains free. Because sometimes the most dangerous thing is not that we do not know enough. It is that we know a little, reason a great deal, and then begin to believe that our conclusion is the whole truth. Saruman is not defeated by the Palantír simply because he looks into it. He is defeated by what happens afterward: he allows what he sees to become the limit of what he can imagine. And Gandalf, through an action so small that it could almost be overlooked, simply pulls the cloth back over the Palantír. As if reminding us: Wisdom does not always mean seeing more. Sometimes wisdom means recognizing that the very way we see can deceive us.

🎼🌺Music Love♥️

15,487 views • 1 month ago

What happened to Jeffrey Sachs is not an argument. It is a ritual, the auto-da-fé of a dying civilization. Europe no longer debates. It excommunicates. Every time truth crosses its borders, it is denounced as heresy, burned in the square of public opinion, and buried under the flags of "values" it no longer lives by. The Italian senator who called Professor Sachs a liar wasn’t defending Ukraine. He was defending the psychological architecture of European dependence. He cannot admit the truth because his career, his ideology, and his identity all collapse if he does. Europe is no longer a continent. It is a colony that thinks itself free. Washington writes the script, Brussels recites it, and the people pay for the performance in cold homes and silent factories. They call it "solidarity." But solidarity with your own jailer is not virtue. It is pathology. Europe kneels before America and mistakes the floor for high ground. It sanctions Russia and bankrupts itself. It sacrifices its own citizens to fund a war it cannot win. It destroys its own energy, its own diplomacy, its own industry, all to prove its loyalty to a master who despises it. Jeffrey Sachs did not embarrass Europe. He revealed it. A continent that once produced Beethoven, Goethe, and Marx now worships at the altar of CNN and NATO press releases. It has traded reason for narrative and memory for submission. The tragedy of Europe is not that it was conquered. It is that it volunteered. It begged for occupation, and now calls vassalage "values." When Professor Sachs spoke, the Italian senator did not hear an argument. He heard a mirror, and mirrors terrify those who live by illusions. Europe isn’t being silenced by America. It is silencing itself out of fear of remembering what it used to be. A civilization that once claimed to civilize the world can no longer govern itself. It outsourced its sovereignty, privatized its conscience, and mortgaged its dignity for access to Washington’s approval. The slave masters of history have become servants in suits, begging their overseer for scraps of relevance. Europe is no longer a continent. It is an accent in America’s voice. And even that accent is fading.

Sony Thăng

363,325 views • 10 months ago